| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism (J.H.L., J.L.C., C.S.M.), Department of Medicine, and Department of Radiology (V.R.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215; and Boston University School of Public Health, Health Services Department, and Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research at Veterans Affairs Health Services Research (E.S.), Boston, Massachusetts 02118
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Christos S. Mantzoros, M.D., Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Stoneman 816, Boston, Massachusetts 02215. E-mail: cmantzor{at}bidmc.harvard.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: The objective of the study was to assess whether administration of recombinant methionyl human leptin (r-metHuLeptin) improves insulin resistance and other metabolic abnormalities in HIV+ leptin-deficient subjects with HAART-induced lipoatrophy.
Design, Setting, Patients, and Intervention: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, crossover study from 2002 to 2004 in seven HIV+ men with HAART-induced lipoatrophy, serum leptin level less than 3 ng/ml, and fasting triglyceride level greater than 300 mg/dl, who were administered placebo for 2 months before or after administration of r-metHuLeptin at physiological doses for an additional 2 months.
Main Outcome Measures: Insulin resistance, lipid levels, inflammatory markers, body composition, and HIV control were measured.
Results: Compared with placebo, r-metHuLeptin therapy improved fasting insulin levels, insulin resistance (as expressed by the homeostasis model assessment index and an insulin suppression test), and high-density lipoprotein. Body weight and fat mass decreased on r-metHuLeptin, mainly due to a decrease in truncal fat but not peripheral fat or lean body mass. r-metHuLeptin was well tolerated, and HIV control was not adversely affected.
Conclusions: r-metHuLeptin replacement at physiological doses in HIV+ leptin-deficient patients with HAART-induced lipoatrophy improves insulin resistance, high-density lipoprotein, and truncal fat mass. Future larger and more long-term studies in HAART-induced lipoatrophy, including patients with more severe metabolic abnormalities, are warranted to evaluate the physiological and potentially therapeutic role of r-metHuLeptin for this condition and to fully clarify the underlying mechanisms of action.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The HAART-induced metabolic syndrome is likely a multifactorial disorder, with complex interactions of drug, viral, and host-related factors potentially contributing to the development of this syndrome (13). Although the most compelling risk factor is antiretroviral therapy with protease inhibitors and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, gender, genetic predisposition, virally mediated mechanisms involving HIV-1 accessory proteins (14, 15), and/or altered hormone (16, 17, 18, 19, 20), and/or inflammatory cytokine (21) levels may also contribute to this syndrome.
Specifically, low levels of leptin may play an important role in the pathogenesis of this metabolic syndrome. Rodents (22) and humans (23) with severe congenital lipoatrophy have leptin deficiency, and administration of exogenous leptin substantially improves their severe insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, hepatic steatosis, and body composition (22, 23). Because patients with HIV lipoatrophy have low leptin levels (7), we hypothesized that the relative leptin deficiency in these subjects may contribute to their insulin resistance and other metabolic abnormalities. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a proof-of-concept, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study involving replacement-dose recombinant methionyl human leptin (r-metHuLeptin) administration in patients with HAART-induced lipoatrophy, relative leptin deficiency, and metabolic syndrome to evaluate whether normalizing leptin levels would improve the metabolic profile in these patients.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Seven men 18 yr old or older, with HIV-1 infection, 6 months or more of cumulative HAART, serum leptin level less than 3 ng/ml, fasting triglyceride level greater than 300 mg/dl, and lipoatrophy as previously defined (8) that developed after HAART initiation, were studied. Exclusion criteria included active infectious diseases other than HIV infection, renal insufficiency, liver disease (aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase
3 times normal), malignancy, diabetes before alanine HAART initiation, thyroid disease, hypercortisolism, and active alcohol or drug abuse.
Study design
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and all subjects provided written informed consent to participate. Ten of 25 screened subjects met the study eligibility criteria. Seven of the 10 eligible subjects entered a 1-month run-in phase, during which time they maintained a stable diet and exercise regimen. The remaining three eligible subjects expressed their inability to comply with the study requirements, i.e. with regard to travel to the study center for multiple visits. Six of the seven subjects studied were on protease inhibitors [three on Kaletra (lopinavir + ritonavir), two on indinavir, two on ritonavir (without lopinavir), one on saquinavir, and one on amprenavir]. Six of the seven subjects were on nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (five on stavudine, three on lamivudine, two on abacavir, and one on didanosine). Two of the seven subjects were also on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (one on nevirapine and one on efavirenz). None of the subjects were on insulin sensitizers or lipid-lowering medications, except one subject who was on fish oil, which was continued at the same dose throughout the study.
Subjects with triglyceride level greater than 300 mg/dl but less than 1000 mg/dl at the end of the 1-month run-in phase were randomized by an independent research pharmacist, in a double-blind fashion, to initial treatment with either r-metHuLeptin or matching placebo at a dose of 0.04 mg/kg·d divided into two equal doses, which were self-administered by sc injection at 0800 and 2000 h daily for 2 months. They then discontinued treatment for a 1-month washout period before being crossed over to receive the other treatment for 2 months, followed by another 1-month washout period.
Subjects had the following baseline tests at the beginning of each r-metHuLeptin or placebo treatment period: hormone and other metabolic measurements [leptin, insulin, glucose, free fatty acids (FFAs), adiponectin], with HOMA-IR calculated as [(insulin [microinternational units per milliliter]) x (glucose [millimoles per liter])]/22.5, lipid measurements (total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), apolipoprotein A1 and B, lipoprotein particle size), thrombotic factors (factor VIII, fibrinogen), inflammatory markers [TNF
, IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP)], and HIV markers (CD4 count, CD8 count, HIV viral load); body composition analysis with anthropometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA); and abdominal computed tomography (CT) for measurement of hepatic and im lipid content. Because this is the first r-metHuLeptin administration study in this population, a pharmacokinetic profile of leptin levels at time 0 (baseline), +10 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h, +5 h, +6 h, and +12 h was obtained after the first administered dose of study medication at the beginning of each treatment arm.
Subjects were advised to keep their HAART regimen (documented by review at each study visit), exercise regimen, and diet stable (monitored through log books) and returned every 2 wk during treatment for measurement of leptin, insulin, glucose, lipid levels, and liver function tests, with anthropometry measurements at 4 wk. At the end of each 2-month treatment period, subjects had repeat measurement of all the baseline tests as outlined above. In addition, they had a standard insulin suppression test (Galvins Index), which provides an estimation of insulin sensitivity over a 3-h period by assessing the decline in glucose over a 40-min period divided by the area under the insulin curve (24) and captures approximately 90% of information on insulin sensitivity (25).
The primary outcome was to study the effect of r-metHuLeptin replacement on insulin resistance, as expressed primarily by fasting insulin but also HOMA-IR and Galvins Index. Secondarily, we assessed lipid measurements, body composition, thrombotic factors, inflammatory markers, and measures of HIV control and immune function, as described above.
Assessments
Standard techniques were used to measure leptin (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO), adiponectin (Linco Research), insulin (Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA), TNF
(R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), IL-6 (R&D Systems), CRP (Diagnostic Systems Laboratory, Webster, TX), FFAs (Wako Chemicals, Neuss, Germany), lipoprotein particle size (Liposcience, Raleigh NC), and apolipoprotein A1 and B (Roche, Stockholm, Sweden). Other laboratory testing was performed at the BIDMC clinical laboratory. Body composition was measured using DEXA (QDR-4500; Hologic, Bedford, MA).
An eight-row multidetector CT scanner (LightSpeed Plus; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) was used to assess liver volume and quantitate hepatic and im lipid content. Spiral CT was used to scan the liver and upper abdomen, and approximately 36 5-mm-thick slices were obtained in 3 sec. Using commercially available software (GE Advantage Windows, GE Medical Systems), the liver was segmented using a semiautomated technique that provides high accuracy in assessing liver volume (26). Normal liver volume for a male is considered 22.9 ml/kg, or 1603 ml for a 70-kg person. The mean attenuation of the liver volume in Hounsfield units (HU) was then measured, and an attenuation of 6070 HU was considered normal (27). Considering fat attenuation at 100 HU, percent liver fat was then calculated using the following formula: [([60 mean liver attenuation]/160) x 100]. Muscle attenuation over the left and right psoas muscles at the level of L4 was measured to assess im lipid content, which was calculated as follows: [([40 mean muscle attenuation]/140) x 100]. Normal muscle attenuation is considered to be 40 HU (28).
Abdominal fat mass was measured using DEXA because its data reflect a larger area and assessment of truncal fat over the entire abdomen, not only from one slice. We previously reported a strong correlation between truncal fat, a marker of central adiposity obtained by DEXA, and waist circumference, a surrogate marker for central adiposity obtained at one level (Pearson coefficient = 0.90, P < 0.001) (29). Abdominal fat mass was also assessed by CT scanning to determine whether changes in abdominal fat represented changes in visceral fat and/or sc fat.
Statistical analysis
SAS (version 8.02, SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and SPSS (version 11.5, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) were used for statistical analysis, and P < 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant for all analyses. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. We used nonparametric Wilcoxon tests to compare change under r-metHuLeptin vs. placebo, with Wilcoxons rank sum (independent-samples tests) as primary analysis (intention-to-treat analysis, n = 7 receiving r-metHuLeptin and n = 7 completing placebo treatment), and Wilcoxons signed rank (paired tests) as secondary analysis (on-treatment analysis, n = 5 completing both r-metHuLeptin and placebo treatments). We also performed multivariate analysis by fitting a mixed model with a random subject component permitting correlation within patients and nonconstant variability, and controlling for treatment sequence, with and without additional adjustment for changes in visceral fat mass. To assess how quickly and stably the treatment improves insulin resistance and hyperlipidemia (repeated-measures analysis), we used the generalized estimating equation procedure, specifying a within-subject correlation structure and testing for significant differences in treatment effects between initiation of treatment and each of the four subsequent time points during treatment. We present both adjusted and unadjusted models herein. Using an alpha level of 0.05, our study had 90% power to detect a difference in means between the two groups that is equal to or larger than 2.2 SE of the mean of the respective variable (and 80% power to detect a difference in means between the two groups that is equal to or larger than 1.9 SE of the respective mean).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Seven subjects completed at least one arm of the study; five subjects completed both r-metHuLeptin and placebo treatments. Two subjects were withdrawn, after 1
and 2 months of r-metHuLeptin, respectively, because their triglyceride levels were greater than the 1000 mg/dl level specified in the protocol. The two withdrawn subjects had triglyceride levels greater than 1000 mg/dl intermittently before starting the study. The subject who was withdrawn after 1
months of r-metHuLeptin therapy was on two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and a protease inhibitor. The subject who was withdrawn after 2 months of therapy was on two protease inhibitors as well as fish oil, which was continued at the same dose throughout the study. After leaving the study, the two withdrawn subjects were started on lipid-lowering agents by their primary care physicians with improvement in their triglyceride levels.
The pharmacokinetic profile performed at the beginning of the r-metHuLeptin arm revealed leptin levels of 0.88 ± 0.49 ng/ml at baseline, 6.90 ± 1.00 ng/ml at 10 min, a peak of 16.0 ± 1.27 ng/ml at 4 h, and 2.53 ± 0.84 ng/ml at 12 h (Fig. 1
). There were no significant differences in any variables at the beginning of the two treatment periods, indicating that the washout was successful. By univariate analysis, there were also no significant differences between the r-metHuLeptin and placebo arms with regard to intake of total kilocalories, protein, carbohydrates, total fat, and saturated fat. However, with multivariate analysis accounting for random subject effect and treatment order, there was a trend toward a significant decrease in total kilocalories (P = 0.06).
|
|
Fasting insulin levels, HOMA-IR (Table 1
), and Galvins Index (P = 0.06) (measures of insulin resistance) declined, whereas HDL levels increased, with r-metHuLeptin. Specifically, insulin decreased by 5 IU/ml, or 30% during r-metHuLeptin treatment, and after controlling for the increase on placebo, there was a relative decrease in insulin of 11.9 IU/ml, or 71.9%. Furthermore, by analysis of treatment-by-period interaction, the effect of r-metHuLeptin on insulin levels became statistically significant after 6 wk of therapy (P = 0.02) (Fig. 2
). Similarly, HOMA-IR decreased by 1.06, or 29.6%, in the r-metHuLeptin arm, and after adjusting for placebo, there was a relative decrease in HOMA-IR of 2.67, or 74.6%, which became statistically significant after 4 wk of therapy (P = 0.02) (Fig. 2
). Multivariate analysis adjusting for random subject effect and treatment order, with and without additional adjustment for change in visceral fat, did not materially alter the findings of the univariate models, with the exception of HDL and IL-6.
|
IL-6 decreased by 1.91 pg/ml, or 53.7%, in the r-metHuLeptin arm, but after adjusting for a decrease on placebo, there was a relative decrease of 1.41 pg/ml, or 39.6%. However, there was no significant difference in IL-6 levels between the two groups after multivariate analysis adjusting for random subject effect and treatment order (P = 0.17), or after additional adjustment for change in visceral fat (P = 0.24, Table 1
), indicating that there is no significant effect of leptin on decreasing IL-6.
There were no significant changes in percentage liver fat, liver volume, triglycerides, LDL, FFAs, TNF
, CRP, CD4+ lymphocytes, HIV viral load (Table 1
), CD8+ lymphocytes, adiponectin, im lipid content, apolipoprotein levels, lipoprotein particle size, factor VIII, fibrinogen, or blood pressure between the two treatment arms (data not shown). No effect of treatment order was observed, and no subjects had side effects related to r-metHuLeptin treatment.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Uncontrolled studies of chronic r-metHuLeptin administration in humans with severe congenital non-HIV lipodystrophy and leptin deficiency have shown dramatic improvements in insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and hepatic steatosis (23, 30, 31). The more modest improvement with r-metHuLeptin observed herein, compared with that observed in congenital lipodystrophy, is likely related primarily to the milder degree of leptin deficiency, as well as the shorter duration of leptin deficiency, and/or the presence of less severe metabolic abnormalities (by design). Whereas the HAART-induced lipoatrophy and metabolic syndrome can range from mild metabolic abnormalities, such as in the subjects studied herein, to more severe manifestations, the degree of metabolic derangements is generally not as pronounced as in congenital severe lipodystrophy. Furthermore, given that HAART-induced lipoatrophy and metabolic syndrome is considerably more prevalent than congenital severe lipodystrophy, our findings are applicable to a much larger population.
It has been proposed that leptin may improve insulin resistance through several mechanisms, i.e. activating insulin signaling pathways including skeletal muscle phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and AMP-activated protein kinase (32), decreasing intrahepatic and intramyocellular fat (33), decreasing caloric intake (30, 34), and/or decreasing body weight and fat mass (30). In contrast to the studies of leptin replacement for 4 months in patients with severe non-HIV lipodystrophy (30), we did not find a significant decrease in appetite, which may be due to the lower r-metHuLeptin dose used herein, and found only a trend toward decreased caloric intake after multivariate analysis. However, there was a significant decrease in body weight, BMI, percent body fat, and total fat mass, mainly due to decreased truncal fat.
Transgenic mouse models of lipoatrophy have provided further understanding about leptins role in the insulin resistance and metabolic profile associated with lipoatrophy. These models are characterized by marked insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and decreased expression and/or activation of leptin, adiponectin, and peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-
(35, 36, 37, 38), a nuclear factor that plays essential roles in adipogenesis, adiponectin production, and glucose and lipid metabolism (39, 40). In lipoatrophic mice, transplantation of ob/ob (leptin-deficient) adipose tissue had no effect on the metabolic phenotype, whereas leptin infusion (without adipose tissue transplantation) improved the metabolic status of the mice, thereby supporting the concept that leptin deficiency plays a major role in the metabolic derangements of lipoatrophy (38). Furthermore, leptin or adiponectin treatment alone improved insulin resistance partially, whereas the combination of the two completely reversed insulin resistance (37).
A critical step in the development of the HAART-induced metabolic syndrome is the inhibition of adipocyte expression of PPAR-
(41, 42). Because PPAR-
is preferentially expressed in peripheral adipose tissue (43), inhibition of PPAR-
expression by protease inhibitors would result in apoptosis and impaired differentiation of peripheral adipocytes, thus contributing to the fat redistribution, abnormal adipokine levels, and metabolic changes associated with the HAART-induced metabolic syndrome. We did not observe any significant change in adiponectin levels with r-metHuLeptin therapy, consistent with our previous data showing that leptin administration at physiological or pharmacological doses does not alter serum adiponectin levels in normal subjects (29). However, thiazolidinediones, PPAR-
agonists that increase adiponectin levels, have recently been shown to improve insulin sensitivity in HIV lipoatrophic humans (44, 45). Whether combination treatment with r-metHuLeptin and a medication that increases adiponectin levels, such as a thiazolidinedione, has a synergistic effect to improve insulin resistance and metabolic abnormalities in humans remains to be studied.
In summary, this study focused on a prevalent syndrome of lipoatrophy and mild insulin resistance, was of adequate power, found statistically significant results, and establishes the proof-of-concept for r-metHuLeptin replacement in HAART-induced lipoatrophy and metabolic syndrome. Strengths of this interventional study include the randomized, placebo-controlled design that reduces bias and confounding, the crossover methodology that increases study power, and the intensive evaluation of multiple parameters that more fully elucidates the role of leptin in this syndrome. Larger studies of patients with more severe HAART-induced lipoatrophy and metabolic abnormalities, using high-physiological and possibly pharmacological r-metHuLeptin doses over longer periods of time, are warranted to further evaluate the physiological and potentially therapeutic role of r-metHuLeptin in this disorder and clarify the underlying mechanisms of action.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online April 24, 2006
Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; CT, computed tomography; DEXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; FFA, free fatty acid; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HU, Hounsfield unit; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; PPAR, peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor; r-metHuLeptin, recombinant methionyl human leptin.
Received July 12, 2005.
Accepted April 17, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
knockout causes insulin resistance in fat and liver but not in muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1571215717
have depot-specific effects on human preadipocyte differentiation. J Clin Invest 100:31493153[Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Mallewa, E. Wilkins, J. Vilar, M. Mallewa, D. Doran, D. Back, and M. Pirmohamed HIV-associated lipodystrophy: a review of underlying mechanisms and therapeutic options J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 18, 2008; (2008) dkn251v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kratz, J. Q. Purnell, P. A. Breen, K. K. Thomas, K. M. Utzschneider, D. B. Carr, S. E. Kahn, J. P. Hughes, E. A. Rutledge, B. Van Yserloo, et al. Reduced Adipogenic Gene Expression in Thigh Adipose Tissue Precedes Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Lipoatrophy J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 959 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Samaras Metabolic consequences and therapeutic options in highly active antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2008; 61(2): 238 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Bermudez-Humaran, S. Nouaille, V. Zilberfarb, G. Corthier, A. Gruss, P. Langella, and T. Issad Effects of Intranasal Administration of a Leptin-Secreting Lactococcus lactis Recombinant on Food Intake, Body Weight, and Immune Response of Mice Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 15, 2007; 73(16): 5300 - 5307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Chan, S. L. Wong, C. Orlova, P. Raciti, and C. S. Mantzoros Pharmacokinetics of Recombinant Methionyl Human Leptin after Subcutaneous Administration: Variation of Concentration-Dependent Parameters According to Assay J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 2307 - 2311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |