| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Institutes of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Diseases of Metabolism (S.S.D., N.M.L., M.S.P., A.J., D.M., K.S.L., L.L., M.D.), Digestive Diseases (P.M.P.), and Otorhinolaryngology (V.B.D.), Belgrade University School of Medicine, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Svetozar S. Damjanovic, Institute of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Diseases of Metabolism, Dr Subotica 13, 11000 Beograd, Serbia. E-mail: sova{at}net.yu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: Our objective was to reveal the effect of ghrelin on insulin-mediated glucose disposal in gastrectomized patients.
Study and Setting: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, hospital-based study.
Patients: Seven men and three women who all had a previous total gastrectomy and truncal vagotomy entered and completed the study.
Intervention: Each individual received infusion of saline alone or saline with ghrelin (5.0 pmol/kg·min) during a 5-h hyperinsulinemic (80 mU/m2·min) euglycemic clamp on 2 separate days.
Main Outcome Measures: We assessed glucose disposal rate and concentrations of C-peptide, ghrelin, GH, IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 and -1, cortisol, leptin, and adiponectin.
Results: Glucose disposal rate decreased during ghrelin infusion (control study 8.6 ± 0.2 vs. 7.2 ± 0.1 mg/kg·min P < 0.001). In experiments with saline infusion, levels of ghrelin (P < 0.001), C-peptide (P < 0.001), glucagon (P < 0.001), adiponectin (P = 0.005), cortisol (P = 0.012), IGF-I (P < 0.001), IGFBP-3 (P = 0.038), and IGFBP-1 (P = 0.001) fell in response to euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. GH concentration maintained at baseline, whereas leptin significantly rose (P < 0.001). In the ghrelin infusion study, the plateau level of ghrelin concentration (6963.6 ± 212.9 pg/ml) was maintained from 90 min throughout the experiment. GH (P < 0.001) and cortisol (P = 0.04) concentrations rose, whereas C-peptide levels were more suppressed than in the control study (P < 0.001). Other hormones and IGFBPs changed similarly as in the study with saline infusion.
Conclusion: It appears that ghrelin might be involved in the negative control of insulin secretion and glucose consumption in gastrectomized patients, at least after acute administration.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Whether ghrelin influences glucose consumption in humans is unknown. We investigated therefore the effects of iv ghrelin or saline infusion on insulin-mediated glucose disposal in 10 gastrectomized patients during a 5-h exogenous glucose infusion (hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic glucose clamp).
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ten patients (seven men) who underwent total gastrectomy and truncal vagotomy because of gastric carcinoma were enrolled in the study, which was approved by the local ethical committee and conducted according to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. All patients gave their written consent to participate in the study. Patients were in good health as determined by medical history, physical examination, and laboratory and radiological evaluation. Patients entered the study protocol 12108 months (44.5 ± 9.1, mean ± SE) after operation. Individual characteristics of patients are presented in Table 1
. Percent body fat mass (FM) was estimated by hand-to-foot impedance.
|
Assays
Plasma glucose was determined by the glucose oxidase method (glucose autoanalyzer from Beckman, Fullerton, CA). Plasma concentration of FFA was measured with an enzymatic colorimetric assay as described before (20).
Insulin and C-peptide levels were determined by RIA (INEP, Zemun, Serbia). Lower limits of sensitivity were 3.0 mU/liter and 0.15 nmol/liter for insulin and C-peptide, respectively. The average intra- and interassay coefficients of variation (CV) were less than 10.0% for both assays. Pancreatic glucagon was measured by RIA (RIAZEN; Zen Tech S.A., Angleur, Belgium). The limit of detection was 15 pg/ml, and the intra- and interassay CV were 8 and 8.2%, respectively. Total leptin, adiponectin, and ghrelin concentrations were measured using commercially available RIAs (human RIA kits from Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, MO). The lowest levels of leptin, adiponectin, and ghrelin that could be detected by these assays were 0.5 µg/liter, 1.0 ng/ml, and 93.0 pg/ml, respectively. The intra- and interassay CV were less than 10.0% for leptin and adiponectin assays, whereas for the ghrelin RIA kit, intra- and interassay CV were less than 10.0 and 16.0%, respectively. Plasma GH was determined by solid-phase two-site fluorometric assay based on the direct sandwich technique with two monoclonal antibodies directed against two different epitopes of the hGH molecule (Delfia, Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland). The minimal detection limit was 0.011 µg/liter, and intra- and interassay CV were less than 5.0 and 6.3%, respectively. Concentrations of serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were determined by solid-phase enzyme-labeled chemiluminescent immunometric assays (Immulite 2000; Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA) with lower detection limits of 20 ng/ml and 0.02 µg/ml, respectively. Intra- and interassay CV for IGF-I were less than 3.9 and 8.1% and for IGFBP-3 less than 4.6 and 7.3%, respectively. We used a commercial test to measure serum IGFBP-1 (IEMA test; Oy Medix Biochemica Ab, Kauniainen, Finland). The detection limit with this assay was 0.4 µg/liter, and intra- and interassay CV were less then 5.5 and 5.9%, respectively. Cortisol concentration was measured with RIA kits (CORT-CT2) supplied by CIS Bio International (Gif-Sur-Yvette, France). The minimum detectable concentration was 4.6 nmol/liter. Intra- and interassay CV were less than 5.4 and 7.3%, respectively.
Calculations and statistical analyses
Data are expressed as means ± SE M values (in milligrams glucose per kilogram per minute) as a measure of insulin-mediated glucose disposal, and the metabolic clearance rate of insulin was calculated as described before (21, 22). Individual differences in M values (
M) between the control and the ghrelin infusion study were calculated. To calculate the steady-state plasma glucose and insulin concentrations during the insulin infusion, the mean values from 90300 min were used (22). Individual differences in ghrelin concentrations (
G) between basal and nadir in control and peak and basal in the ghrelin infusion study were estimated. Within-group comparisons were performed with the two-tailed paired Students t test or repeated-measures ANOVA. Linear relationships between variables were tested by correlational analysis (Pearson product moment). A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Basal levels of ghrelin were similar in the control and the ghrelin infusion study [532.3 ± 85.1 vs. 582.2 ± 69.0 pg/ml; P = not significant (NS)]. Insulin induced a significant decrease of ghrelin levels in the control experiment (P < 0.001) and achieved nadir at 210 min (352.0 ± 92.2 pg/ml; P < 0.001) (Fig. 1
). Plasma ghrelin levels increased in comparison with basal values during ghrelin infusion (P < 0.001), reaching a mean plateau level of 6963.6 ± 212.9 pg/ml at 90 min that was maintained throughout the experiment (Fig. 1
).
|
Plasma glucose concentrations were maintained at 5.0 ± 0.16 mmol/liter during steady state of both insulin clamp studies. M values fell significantly during the clamp study with ghrelin infusion in comparison with the control study (7.2 ± 0.1 vs. 8.6 ± 0.2 mg/kg·min; P < 0.001) (Fig. 1
). There was no difference (P = NS) in basal insulin levels between the studies without and with ghrelin infusion (8.4 ± 0.5 vs. 8.9 ± 0.7 mU/liter). Similar mean steady-state insulin concentrations were achieved during the control experiment and the study with ghrelin infusion (140.1 ± 1.4 and 135.2 ± 0.6 mU/liter; P = NS). The metabolic clearance rate of insulin averaged 574.2 ± 88.1 ml/m2·min during the control study and was unchanged by ghrelin (604.2 ± 56.7 ml/m2·min; P = NS). Plasma glucagon concentrations declined in both the control (P < 0.001) and the ghrelin infusion study (P = 0.05) (Fig. 1
). Of note, the fall of glucagon from baseline to nadir detected in the control study (137.8 ± 10.2 vs. 100.4 ± 7.8 pg/ml; P < 0.001) was of borderline significance when ghrelin was added with saline (136.9 ± 8.7 vs. 114.3 ± 5.3 pg/ml; P = 0.05). In both experiments, insulin equally suppressed FFA levels (P = NS). Plasma FFA concentration showed a progressive decline from basal values, reaching almost complete suppression after 90 min in both the control (484.9 ± 71.8 vs. 35.5 ± 12.7 µmol/liter; P < 0.001) and the ghrelin infusion study (542.4 ± 40.6 vs. 55.2 ± 14.5 µmol/liter; P < 0.001) (Fig. 2
). C-peptide levels significantly decreased in both experiments (P < 0.001). However, in comparison with the control study, C-peptide levels were more suppressed during the experiment with ghrelin infusion (P = 0.028); the major differences between the two studies were observed at 120 min (P = 0.021), 150 min (P = 0.018), 180 min (P = 0.01), and 210 min (P = 0.05) (Fig. 2
).
|
At baseline, serum leptin (4.0 ± 1.5 vs. 4.0 ± 1.3 µg/liter; P = NS) and adiponectin (37.0 ± 4.9 vs. 35.6 ± 3.9 µg/ml; P = NS) levels were similar in the control and ghrelin infusion experiment. Leptin concentrations increased in both clamp studies (P < 0.001), in a similar way, beginning from 210 min (P = 0.038) (Fig. 2
). The highest values were achieved at the end of the experiments (P < 0.001). Adiponectin concentrations decreased equally from baseline (P = 0.005) in both experiments, achieving nadir at 150 min (P = 0.001), which was maintained until the end of the experiments. Thus, changes in serum leptin and adiponectin levels were unaffected by ghrelin administration (P = NS) (Fig. 2
).
GH-IGF-I axis
At baseline, plasma GH (1.7 ± 0.7 vs. 1.4 ± 0.4 µg/liter; P = NS) and serum IGF-I (72.2 ± 4.1 vs. 72.6 ± 4.6 µg/liter; P = NS), IGFBP-3 (2.8 ± 0.19 vs. 2.8 ± 0.18 µg/ml; P = NS), and IGFBP-1 (17.2 ± 4.3 vs. 12.9 ± 2.2 µg/liter; P = NS) levels were similar in the control and ghrelin infusion studies. Plasma GH remained unchanged during the control study. Ghrelin infusion induced a significant rise of GH from baseline (P < 0.001), reaching peak concentration at 90 min (48.3 ± 5.1 µg/liter; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3
). In comparison with respective baseline values, infusion of insulin alone caused a decrease in concentrations of IGF-I (P < 0.001), IGFBP-3 (P = 0.038), and IGFBP-1 (P = 0.001), and these values were unchanged by ghrelin infusion (P = NS for all) (Fig. 3
). Nadir levels of IGF-I (68.6 ± 4.3 and 69.3 ± 5.8 µg/liter; P = 0.006 for both) and IGFBP-3 (2.6 ± 0.15 and 2.6 ± 0.18 µg/ml; P = 0.017 for both) were reached between 60 and 90 min in the saline and the ghrelin infusion study, respectively, whereas IGFBP-1 reached the lowest concentrations at the end of the experiments (5.5 ± 0.9 and 4.3 ± 0.8 µg/liter; P < 0.001 for both).
|
Morning cortisol levels were similar in the control and the ghrelin infusion study (399.3 ± 34.0 and 347.3 ± 25.0 nmol/liter; P = NS). In the control study, a diurnal decrease of cortisol concentrations (P = 0.012) reached nadir at 120 min (P = 0.013) and was completely abolished by ghrelin infusion (P = 0.04). The largest divergence in cortisol levels between the control and the ghrelin infusion study was at 120 min (264.9 ± 27.9 vs. 392.2 ± 29.9 nmol/liter; P = 0.020) (Fig. 4
).
|
M values and GH-IGF-I axis. Individual differences in M value were positively associated with basal IGF-I (r = 0.66; P = 0.039) and IGFBP-3 levels (r = 0.76; P = 0.01) in both the control and the ghrelin infusion study.
Ghrelin and
M values.
Correlation of borderline significance between plasma ghrelin changes (
G) and
M (r = 0.62; P = 0.054) was found in the control study and was significant in the ghrelin infusion study (r = 0.70; P = 0.026).
Nutritional factors. Body mass index (BMI) correlated positively with basal C-peptide (r = 0.69; P = 0.03), leptin (r = 0.64; P = 0.048), and percent FM (r = 0.74; P = 0.014) and negatively with basal levels of GH (r = 0.87; P = 0.001) and IGFBP-1 (r = 0.78; P = 0.007). A positive relationship between leptin and percent FM was found (r = 0.82; P = 0.003). Basal glucagon concentrations correlated positively with basal levels of adiponectin (r = 0.75; P = 0.01) and IGFBP-1 (r = 0.65; P = 0.04), whereas it was inversely related to basal C-peptide (r = 0.80; P = 0.005). In the saline study, the percent ghrelin suppression was in negative correlation with BMI (r = 0.79; P = 0.007), and the extent of glucagon and cortisol decline was in negative relationship (r = 0.81; P = 0.008). In the ghrelin infusion experiment, the extent of glucagon decrease was in negative association with basal adiponectin (r = 0.80; P = 0.006) and IGFBP-1 (r = 0.64; P = 0.048). Individual percent changes in plasma ghrelin and adiponectin were in positive association (r = 0.69; P = 0.03). Similarly, individual changes in insulin-mediated glucose disposal index caused by ghrelin were positively associated with basal IGF-I concentrations (r = 0.66; P = 0.004).
Ghrelin and GH-IGF-I axis.
The maximal decrease of ghrelin (
G) in the control study correlated positively with basal IGF-I (r = 0.67; P = 0.034) and IGFBP-3 (r = 0.85; P = 0.002) and inversely with basal GH (r = 0.69; P = 0.03) and IGFBP-1 (r = 0.77; P = 0.009) concentrations. Similarly, the maximal decline of IGFBP-1 was positively correlated with maximal decrease of ghrelin in the control study (r = 0.74; P = 0.015).
Ghrelin and serum cortisol.
Individual differences between peak and basal cortisol levels correlated positively with
G (r = 0.68; P = 0.031) in the ghrelin infusion study.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ghrelin induced a marked decrease in circulating C-peptide during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia in our patients. This is consistent with previous reports showing that acute administration of acylated ghrelin in healthy subjects causes a decrease in insulin levels and an increase of plasma glucose concentration (15, 16). Moreover, an inhibitory effect of ghrelin on insulin secretion has been demonstrated in vitro in experiments on isolated rat pancreas (14). On the other hand, gastrectomy and vagotomy are nonphysiological conditions characterized by hypoghrelinemia (9), glucose intolerance as a result of hyperglucagonemia, insulinopenia, and impaired first phase of insulin secretion (6). Reduced parasympathetic tone appears to have a role in the development of impaired insulin secretion in these patients, because glucagon-stimulated C-peptide secretion after gastrectomy is restrained by vagotomy (24). Thus, in vagotomized patients, increased sympathetic nerve tone and glucagon levels might affect insulin response to ghrelin infusion (6, 22). However, involvement of the sympathetic nerve system is unlikely because it has been shown that ghrelin decreases blood pressure (25), inhibits sympathetic activity and thermogenesis (26, 27, 28), and causes vasodilatation (29) in animals and humans. Therefore, a direct effect of ghrelin at the level of the endocrine pancreas seems possible. Whether lowered basal ghrelin levels in gastrectomized and vagotomized patients are also associated with reduced contribution of ghrelin to the control of pancreatic ß-cell function is unknown.
Compared with saline control experiments, ghrelin infusion was associated with a modest (by
17%) but significant decline in glucose utilization. Theoretically, ghrelin could affect glucose disposal rate in several ways. Because ghrelin enhanced C-peptide suppression, endogenous insulin secretion should be lower in the ghrelin infusion than in the control study. On the other hand, total insulin (exogenous plus endogenous) should be higher in the control than in the ghrelin infusion study. However, this was not the case, and the difference in C-peptide was not translated into a significant difference in insulin concentration, probably because the exogenous insulin by far overweighs endogenous insulin. Thus, we cannot rule out the possibility that diminished glucose utilization after ghrelin administration could result in part from the decrease in endogenous insulin secretion. Furthermore, the observed difference in glucose infusion rate could arise from slightly higher concentrations of glucagon throughout the study with ghrelin infusion. It has already been shown that ghrelin stimulates glucagon secretion from isolated mouse pancreatic islets (30). Liver contribution to observed insulin resistance seems possible, because high levels of ghrelin, even in the face of persistent hyperinsulinemia, could augment hepatic glucose output through glucagon-induced glycogenolysis (31). Besides, ghrelin likely blocks the inhibitory effect of insulin on gluconeogenesis, which was demonstrated in a human hepatoma cell line (32). Ghrelin was shown to stimulate insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1) and its downstream molecules including growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (Grb2) and MAPK, whereas on the other hand, it inhibited serine/threonine kinase (Akt) activation and up-regulated gluconeogenesis by opposing the effect of insulin on phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (32). In line with this, it has been reported that some of the ghrelin analogs might affect insulin-signaling pathways in humans (33).
We showed that ghrelin-induced C-peptide suppression and decline in glucose disposal rate were triggered by mechanisms independent of adiponectin and leptin, because their concentrations changed similarly in both experiments. The observed changes in plasma concentrations of adiponectin and leptin can be explained by insulin action (34, 35, 36, 37, 38). Because ghrelin and adiponectin travel with changes in insulin sensitivity, a high normal concentration of adiponectin and low basal concentration of plasma ghrelin in our gastrectomized patients suggest an insulin-sensitive condition (9, 36, 39, 40, 41, 42). It appears that impairment of the glucose-induced insulin secretion in gastrectomized patients is not in contrast with increased insulin sensitivity in these patients but rather suggests that it can be compensated for by an increase in secretory signals governed by non-glucose-activated transduction mechanisms.
Like other investigators (24, 43), we found a marked increase in serum GH and, to a lower extent, cortisol levels after ghrelin infusion. GH and glucocorticoids have been shown to exhibit insulin antagonistic effect (44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51). Acute effects of ghrelin on glucose metabolism in our patients might occur via changes in the GH-IGF-I axis (52), cortisol levels, and nutritional status of examined subjects (23, 53). In the ghrelin infusion study, the plasma ghrelin increase was in positive relationship with changes in IGF-I and cortisol concentration and glucose disposal rate. In the saline study, the extent of ghrelin decrease from basal levels correlated positively with basal IGF-I and IGFBP-3 and inversely with BMI, IGFBP-1, and GH levels. However, a similar decrease of IGF-I and IGFBPs observed throughout experiments with euglycemic hyperinsulinemia indicated that there was no change in bioavailability of IGF-I after ghrelin administration. Participation of GH and cortisol in acute deterioration of insulin sensitivity cannot be excluded, but this effect is unlikely to be mediated through enhanced lipolysis, because FFA were fully suppressed during both experiments.
In conclusion, our data suggest that endogenous ghrelin might be involved in the acute regulation of glucose metabolism via negative control of insulin secretion and glucose consumption. However, whether abnormalities in ß-cell function caused by gastrectomy and vagotomy can be improved by ghrelin substitution requires additional investigations.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online April 18, 2006
Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CV, coefficients of variation; FFA, free fatty acids; FM, fat mass; IGFBP, IGF-binding protein; NS, not significant.
Received July 5, 2005.
Accepted April 10, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-cells of humans and rats, and stimulates insulin secretion. Diabetes 51:124129
expression. Diabetes 52:17791785This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. T. Vestergaard, L. C. Gormsen, N. Jessen, S. Lund, T. K. Hansen, N. Moller, and J. O. L. Jorgensen Ghrelin Infusion in Humans Induces Acute Insulin Resistance and Lipolysis Independent of Growth Hormone Signaling Diabetes, December 1, 2008; 57(12): 3205 - 3210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Paulo, R. Brundage, M. Cosma, K. L. Mielke, C. Y. Bowers, and J. D. Veldhuis Estrogen Elevates the Peak Overnight Production Rate of Acylated Ghrelin J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2008; 93(11): 4440 - 4447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gjedde, E. T. Vestergaard, L. C. Gormsen, A. L. D. Riis, J. Rungby, N. Moller, J. Weeke, and J. O. L. Jorgensen Serum Ghrelin Levels Are Increased in Hypothyroid Patients and Become Normalized by L-Thyroxine Treatment J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2277 - 2280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Vestergaard, C. B. Djurhuus, J. Gjedsted, S. Nielsen, N. Moller, J. J. Holst, J. O. L. Jorgensen, and O. Schmitz Acute Effects of Ghrelin Administration on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 438 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Anderwald-Stadler, M. Krebs, M. Promintzer, M. Mandl, M. G. Bischof, P. Nowotny, T. Kastenbauer, A. Luger, R. Prager, and C. Anderwald Plasma obestatin is lower at fasting and not suppressed by insulin in insulin-resistant humans Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1393 - E1398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Vestergaard, T. K. Hansen, L. C. Gormsen, P. Jakobsen, N. Moller, J. S. Christiansen, and J. O. L. Jorgensen Constant intravenous ghrelin infusion in healthy young men: clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolic effects Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2007; 292(6): E1829 - E1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |