| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics (S.P., H.S., B.T., W.M.), Medical University of Graz, A-8036 Graz, Austria; Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health Study Nonprofit LLC (U.S., B.W.), 79098 Freiburg, Germany; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes (B.O.B.), Graduate School Molecular Diabetology and Endocrinology, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany; and Division of Cardiology (J.R.S.), Center of Internal Medicine, Dr. Pohl Stiftungsprofessur Preventive Cardiology, University Hospital Marburg, 35033 Marburg, Germany
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Professor Dr. Med. Winfried März, Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, A-8036 Graz, Austria. E-mail: winfried.maerz{at}klinikum-graz.at.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: The aim of our study was to elucidate the relationship between FFAs and mortality in subjects who underwent coronary angiography.
Design, Setting, and Participants: Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health is a prospective cohort study of Caucasians who had undergone coronary angiography at baseline (19972000). During a median time of follow-up of 5.38 yr, 513 deaths had occurred among 3315 study participants with measured FFAs.
Main Outcome Measure: Hazard ratios for mortality according to FFA levels were measured.
Results: At the fourth quartile of FFAs, fully adjusted hazard ratios for death from any cause and cardiovascular causes were 1.58 (P = 0.002) and 1.83 (P = 0.001), respectively. In persons with angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD), stable CAD, and unstable CAD, the predictive value of FFAs was similar to that in the entire cohort, but the association did not attain statistical significance in persons without CAD analyzed separately. FFA levels were not related to the presence of angiographic CAD but were elevated in subjects with unstable CAD, compared with probands with stable CAD. Furthermore, FFAs increased with the severity of heart failure and were positively correlated with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: FFA levels independently predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in subjects with angiographic CAD. A possible diagnostic use of FFAs warrants further studies, but our results may underline the importance of therapeutic approaches to influence FFA metabolism.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The negative clinical outcome associated with elevated FFAs in myocardial infarction might be attributed to metabolic alterations like accumulation of toxic intermediates, suppression of glucose use, or mitochondrial dysfunctions (11, 12, 13, 15, 16). In addition, there are also studies suggesting that altered cardiac FFA metabolism, especially increased myocardial FFA uptake, might be related to the development of heart failure (17, 18). Despite this compelling evidence for a pivotal role of FFA in cardiovascular disease, clinical studies addressing the relationship between FFA and mortality are sparse (11, 16). Among the rare data on this topic is the Paris Prospective Study I of 5250 men free of ischemic cardiac disease, which demonstrated that FFAs are an independent risk factor for sudden death but not for myocardial infarction or overall cardiovascular mortality (19, 20). The same study also found an unexpected association between FFAs and mortality from cancer (20). Furthermore, high FFAs were predictive for increased mortality in type 2 diabetics (21) and subjects with acute myocardial infarction (11, 16), but to our knowledge there are currently no data available on this issue in a large well-defined cohort of subjects presenting with different stages of coronary artery disease (CAD). Thus, the present study aimed to elucidate the relationship between FFAs and mortality in subjects with and without angiographic proven CAD that were derived from the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study (22). The results of our work support a role of FFAs as a (cardiovascular) risk factor and may promote therapeutic approaches to influence FFA metabolism.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We studied 3315 Caucasians of the LURIC study (22). LURIC is an ongoing prospective cohort study of white individuals investigating risk factors for CAD. The Institutional Review Board at the Ärztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz approved the study. Informed written consent was obtained from each of the participants. With the exception of acute coronary syndromes, the patients had to present in a stable clinical condition without major concomitant noncardiovascular disease. Clinical indications for angiography were chest pain or noninvasive tests consistent with myocardial ischemia (22).
CAD was assessed by angiography using the maximum luminal narrowing estimated by visual analysis. Clinically relevant CAD was defined as the occurrence of at least one stenosis 20% or more in at least one of 15 coronary segments. Individuals with stenosis less than 20% were considered as controls, and in 49 participants the information about this CAD status was not available.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus was diagnosed if plasma glucose was greater than 1.25 g/liter in the fasting state or greater than 2.00 g/liter 2 h after the oral glucose load, respectively, or if individuals were receiving oral antidiabetics or insulin. Hypertension was diagnosed if the systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure exceeded 140 and/or 90 mm Hg or if there was a clinical history significant of hypertension. The definition of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III for the metabolic syndrome was used (23). Homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as the product of the fasting insulin value (microunits per milliliter) and the fasting glucose value (millimoles per liter) divided by 22.5 (24).
Fasting measurements of FFAs, lipoproteins, C-reactive protein (CRP), creatinine, homocysteine, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) were complete in 3266 individuals with coronary angiograms. Among these, 2567 persons had angiographic CAD, and 1535 were in a clinically stable condition, whereas 1032 presented within 7 d after onset of symptoms of unstable angina, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (troponin T > 0.1 µg/liter), or ST-elevation myocardial infarction (troponin T > 0.1 µg/liter).
Information on vital status was obtained from local person registries. No patients were lost to follow-up. Among the 3315 persons with measured FFAs, 513 deaths had occurred during a median time of follow-up of 5.38 yr. Death certificates were obtained for 498 of the decedents and were missing for 15 decedents who were included in the total mortality analysis but excluded from the cardiovascular mortality analysis. Cardiovascular death included the following categories: sudden death, fatal myocardial infarction, death due to congestive heart failure, death immediately after intervention to treat CAD, fatal stroke, and other causes of death due to CAD.
Laboratory analysis
The standard laboratory methods used have been described (22). Fasting blood collection was done before coronary angiography, and samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen at 80 C until analysis. Free (nonesterified) fatty acids were measured enzymatically (ACS-ACOD method) with a nonesterified fatty acid C kit (Wako Chemicals GmbH, Neuss, Germany) on a Wako 30R analyzer. The assay was calibrated by multicalibrators, which were double checked before use against primary standards. Inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation for the FFA assay were 3.0 and 1.6%, respectively. Lipoproteins were separated by a combined ultracentrifugation-precipitation method. Sensitive CRP was measured by immunonephelometry (N High Sensitivity CRP, Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany). NT-pro-BNP was measured by electrochemiluminescence on an Elecsys 2010 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).
Statistical analysis
Continuous parameters following a nonnormal distribution like FFAs were logarithmically transformed before being used in parametric procedures. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of CAD patients and controls are presented as percentages for categorical variables and as medians and 25th and 75th percentiles for continuous variables. Comparisons between groups were performed by Students t test for continuous and by
2 testing for categorical variables. Simple and partial correlation analysis of FFAs and other variables with controlling for possible confounders was applied. We established quartiles of FFA values according to the values of all study participants. To examine the impact of FFAs on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, we calculated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Cox proportional hazards model. Multivariable adjustment was carried out as indicated. All statistical tests were two sided. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The SPSS 11.5 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Compared with individuals without CAD, patients with angiographic CAD were significantly older; smoking, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and ß-blocker and hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor use were more prevalent (Table 1
). The CAD patients had higher systolic blood pressure, higher homocysteine, higher creatinine, higher triglycerides, higher HOMA-IR, lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). CRP was higher in CAD patients than controls, a finding that in part relates to the presence of patients with acute coronary syndromes in the CAD group. CAD patients had significantly higher NT-pro-BNP. Body mass index (BMI) and diastolic blood pressure were similar in patients and controls (Table 1
).
|
Associations of FFAs with cardiovascular risk factors and CAD status
FFA levels were not significantly different in controls and CAD patients, but compared with subjects with stable CAD, they were significantly increased in the unstable CAD group (P = 0.003) (Table 1
). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001), metabolic syndrome (P < 0.001), hypertension (P < 0.001), and male gender (P < 0.001) were associated with increased and smoking with decreased FFA levels (P < 0.001) in the whole study population. In simple correlation analysis, FFAs were positively correlated with age (r = 0.213, P < 0.001), triglycerides (r = 0.168, P < 0.001), HOMA-IR (r = 0.146, P < 0.001), CRP (r = 0.140, P < 0.001), BMI (r = 0.101, P < 0.001), homocysteine (r = 0.071, P < 0.001), and very slightly with HDL-C (r = 0.040, P = 0.021), whereas there was no significant correlation with LDL-C (data not shown). Furthermore, FFAs were positively correlated with NT-pro-BNP (r = 0.177, P < 0.001), even after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, HDL-C, LDL-C, CRP, triglycerides, homocysteine, creatinine, angiographic CAD status, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, smoking status, and New York Heart Association classes (P < 0.001). Compared with New York Heart Association class 1 (0.59, 0.410.83; median and 25th to 75th percentile in millimoles per liter), FFAs were significantly increased in classes 2 (0.65, 0.450.93; P < 0.001), 3 (0.68, 0.501.02; P < 0.001), and 4 (0.82, 0.481.20; P < 0.001).
FFAs and mortality from all causes
Compared with subjects in the lowest quartile of FFAs, the unadjusted hazard ratios for death at FFA concentrations in the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 1.30 (P = 0.076), 1.63 (P < 0.001), and 2.75 (P < 0.001), respectively (model 1, Table 2
). Inclusion of age and gender as covariables decreased these estimates only moderately to 1.14 (P = 0.393), 1.36 (P = 0.036), and 2.23 (P < 0.001), respectively (model 2, Table 2
). FFAs retained their prognostic importance after adjusting for established and emerging cardiovascular risk factors (model 3, Table 2
).
|
Only 56 deaths (8.0%) occurred among the 699 subjects with coronary stenosis less than 20%. Although there was a tendency toward an increased risk of death at high concentrations of FFAs in this group as well (unadjusted hazard ratio 1.78, P = 0.100, for the fourth, compared with the first quartile), the association did not reach statistical significance.
Among the subjects with angiographic CAD, 1535 subjects had stable CAD, and 1032 patients presented with unstable CAD (unstable angina, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, or ST-elevation myocardial infarction). In these subgroups of patients, 282 (18.4%) and 165 deaths (16.0%), respectively, occurred. In both of them, we found consistent associations of FFAs with mortality from all causes (models 13, Table 2
).
FFAs and mortality from cardiovascular causes
Because death certificates were not available for 15 deceased persons, the analysis for causes of mortality included a total of 3300 individuals. Among these, 346 (10.5%) died from cardiovascular causes, 32 (1%) from fatal infection, 57 from fatal cancer (1.7%), and 63 (1.9%) from miscellaneous causes. Hazard ratios for death from cardiovascular causes according to FFAs were higher, compared with those obtained for mortality from all causes in all models and across all subgroups examined (Table 3
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Apart from this, FFAs may also be involved in several crucial steps in atherogenesis, i.e. through their ability to induce endothelial apoptosis and endothelial dysfunction (5, 6, 7, 8, 33). Toward this, FFAs have been shown to increase the activity of protein phosphatase type 2C, which causes apoptosis of endothelial cells (6), a process that might occur preferentially in the coronary arteries by considering that FFAs serve as the main energy source for the myocardium. Therefore, we hypothesized that fatty acids might be a crucial factor causing myocardial infarction in man by destabilizing the endothelial layer of the coronary vessels (5). This hypothesis would perfectly fit within our finding that FFAs are elevated in subjects with unstable CAD but exhibit no significant difference between controls and subjects with angiographic-proven but stable CAD. The increase of FFAs in the unstable CAD group might be due to a surge of catecholamine activity in these patients (12). However, the missing association between FFAs and the angiographic presence of CAD may suggest that apart from (chronic) proatherosclerotic actions, other properties of FFAs may account for our results of an increased mortality associated with high levels of FFAs. Among these are also FFA-induced inflammatory processes, oxidative stress, and lipotoxic effects (1, 6, 18, 34).
To the best of our knowledge, there exists to date no other study investigating the long-term prognostic value of FFA in patients with angiographic CAD. The only large study addressing this issue so far was performed in subjects free of known ischemic cardiac disease (19). That study indicated that FFAs are independently associated with risk for sudden death, a finding that is supported by several observations of the proarrhythmic effects of FFAs, which were reported in conditions with and without cardiac ischemia (11, 12, 13, 14, 35). Interestingly, there was no association between FFAs and death due to myocardial infarction (19). Considering in addition our results of no association between angiographic CAD and FFAs, these data might suggest that the adverse effects of FFAs on the cardiovascular system might mainly be attributed to features leading to arrhythmias and heart failure rather than to proatherosclerotic effects. In this context it should, however, be noted that sudden death and myocardial infarction are closely related, and difficulties in their classification might easily occur and influence these results (19), especially by considering the relatively small number of cases in the Paris Prospective Study (91 for sudden death and 145 for fatal myocardial infarction). Therefore, we decided to present our results without differentiating between particular causes of cardiovascular death. We are also aware of the fact that our results are mainly driven by the outcomes in patients with angiographic CAD due to the lower number of deaths occurring in individuals without CAD. Taking together the current findings and those of the Paris Prospective Study (19), we suggest that high FFAs confer an increased risk of death, regardless of the angiographic status. Nevertheless, large clinical studies with high numbers of well-defined cases are still warranted to further elucidate which causes of death are responsible for the increased cardiovascular mortality associated with high levels of FFAs in subjects with CAD.
The main message of our work is that despite the close association of FFAs with several cardiovascular risk factors (1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 33), its predictive value for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality remains stable even after multivariable adjustments. This indicates that FFA levels provide additional information on mortality risk beyond established risk factors, supporting the idea of a direct involvement in pathophysiological processes.
Should FFAs be measured routinely as a cardiovascular risk factor? Currently this appears to be hampered by the relatively high day-to-day variability in FFA levels (36). However, considering our robust and promising results, diagnostic strategies might be devised in the future that overcome this limitation. Apart from this, the association between FFAs and mortality should further promote therapeutic strategies to influence FFA metabolism in cardiovascular disease (37, 38, 39). These therapies should aim to reduce fatty acid and increase glucose oxidation in the myocardium (37, 38, 39).
In summary, FFA levels independently predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in subjects with angiographic CAD. A possible diagnostic use of FFA still warrants further studies, but our results may suggest that therapeutic approaches influencing FFA metabolism might improve the prognosis of individuals with or at high risk of cardiovascular disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online April 4, 2006
Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; FFA, free fatty acid; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LURIC, Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health study; NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
Received January 27, 2006.
Accepted March 27, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. de Ferranti and D. Mozaffarian The Perfect Storm: Obesity, Adipocyte Dysfunction, and Metabolic Consequences Clin. Chem., June 1, 2008; 54(6): 945 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Boston and P. J. Moate A novel minimal model to describe NEFA kinetics following an intravenous glucose challenge Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): R1140 - R1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pilz, H. Scharnagl, B. Tiran, B. Wellnitz, U. Seelhorst, B. O. Boehm, and W. Marz Elevated plasma free fatty acids predict sudden cardiac death: a 6.85-year follow-up of 3315 patients after coronary angiography Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2007; 28(22): 2763 - 2769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mozaffarian Free fatty acids, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiometabolic stress Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2007; 28(22): 2699 - 2700. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Fantuzzi and T. Mazzone Adipose Tissue and Atherosclerosis: Exploring the Connection Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2007; 27(5): 996 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Birkenfeld, M. Boschmann, C. Moro, F. Adams, K. Heusser, J. Tank, A. Diedrich, C. Schroeder, G. Franke, M. Berlan, et al. {beta}-Adrenergic and Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Interactions on Human Cardiovascular and Metabolic Regulation J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 5069 - 5075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Smith and P. W. F. Wilson Free Fatty acids and atherosclerosis--guilty or innocent? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2006; 91(7): 2506 - 2508. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |