| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Departments of Community Based Medicine (E.M.C., A.R.N.) and Clinical Sciences at South Bristol (J.H.T.), University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8HW, United Kingdom
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. J. Tobias, Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, United Kingdom. E-mail: Jon.Tobias{at}bristol.ac.uk.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: Our objective was to examine the relationship between fat mass and bone mass in children.
Design and Setting: We conducted combined cross-sectional and prospective analyses at university research clinics.
Participants: Participants included children aged 9.9 yr from a large population-based birth cohort in southwest England.
Outcomes: Relationships between total body fat mass were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at age 9.9 yr, and 1) total-body-less-head bone mass and area at age 9.9 and 2) increase in bone mass and area over the following 2 yr.
Results: There was a strong positive relationship between total body fat mass and total-body-less-head bone mass and area, even after adjustment for height and/or lean mass (P < 0.001). There was a similar positive association between total body fat mass and increase in bone mass and area over the following 2 yr in boys and Tanner stage 1 girls. In contrast, no association was present between fat mass and gain in bone mass and size in Tanner stage 2 girls, whereas a negative association was seen in Tanner stage 3 girls (puberty-fat mass interaction, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: In prepubertal children, fat mass is a positive independent determinant of bone mass and size and of increases in these parameters over the following 2 yr, suggesting that adipose tissue acts to stimulate bone growth. However, this relationship is attenuated by puberty.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Contrary to the case in adults, higher body weight has been reported to increase the risk of fracture in children (7, 8). Furthermore, children and adolescents with repeated forearm fractures have been found to have elevated levels of adiposity (9), and obese children have been reported to have a lower bone mass for a given weight in several previous studies (8, 10, 11, 12, 13). On the other hand, in a recent study in which indices of proximal femur geometry were derived from hip dual-energy x-ray aborptiometry (DXA) scans in overweight adolescents, fat mass was not found to influence any skeletal parameter independently of lean mass (14). In addition, in a study of 18 obese and 30 nonobese children, bone age in the former group was more advanced, but BMD was similar (15). Therefore, whether fat mass exerts an independent influence on the skeleton in children as in adults is currently unclear.
Several potential mechanisms exist whereby fat mass might exert a negative influence on bone mass in childhood. For example, adipose tissue is known to express aromatase enzymes that convert steroid precursors to estrogen, which suppress periosteal bone growth (16). Furthermore, increased leptin levels secondary to higher fat mass have been suggested to mediate the negative association between fat mass and periosteal growth observed at non-weight-bearing sites (6). Conversely, fat mass may stimulate bone growth via a direct mechanical action of increased load (17), by association with increased lean mass that occurs in obese subjects (18), or by an indirect action on timing of pubertal events (19).
The link between obesity and timing of pubertal events has been documented by many observers (19, 20, 21, 22), but the exact mechanism behind this is unclear. Obese children may enter puberty earlier than their normal-weight counterparts because of higher estradiol levels or leptin levels (15). Puberty has a key role for bone development because skeletal mass approximately doubles at the end of adolescence (23). Possible interactions between skeletal growth, fat mass, and puberty are undefined but are likely to be present and require further investigation.
We recently investigated the relationship between socioeconomic status and bone mass in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) (24), which is a unique population-based birth cohort of around 14,000 children in southwest England (25). As previously found, social position tended to increase bone area in children aged 9.9 yr as a consequence of greater height. However, lower social position also increased bone area because of higher fat mass. These findings raise the possibility that fat mass exerts an important stimulatory influence on bone growth in childhood.
In this study, we aimed to extend our recent observations by exploring the relationship between fat mass and bone size in children from the ALSPAC cohort in more detail. In particular, we wished to determine whether fat mass is positively related to bone size in prepubertal children independently of height and lean mass. We also examined whether fat mass predicts subsequent gain in bone size as assessed prospectively and whether the relationship between fat mass and bone size is altered by the onset of puberty.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ALSPAC is a geographically based cohort that recruited pregnant women residing in Avon with an expected date of delivery between April 1, 1991, and December 31, 1992. A total of 14,541 pregnancies were initially enrolled, with 14,062 children born. This represented 8090% of the eligible population (see www.alspac.bris.ac.uk for further details on the ALSPAC cohort) (25). Of these births, 13,988 were alive at 12 months. The present study is based on results for height, weight, and total-body DXA scans obtained at research clinics to which the whole cohort was invited at mean ages of 9.9 and 11.8 yr (Fig. 1
). Ethical approval was obtained from the ALSPAC Law and Ethics Committee and local research ethics committees. Parental consent and the childs assent were obtained for all measurements made.
|
Height was measured to the last complete millimeter using the Harpenden stadiometer. Weight was measured to the nearest 50 g using the Tanita body fat analyzer (model TBF 305). Total-body DXA scans were performed using a Lunar Prodigy dual-energy x-ray absorptiometer. Variables used in the present study were total body fat (g) and lean mass (g), and total-body-less-head (TBLH) BMC (g), BMD (g/cm2), and bone area (cm2). Total-body DXA scans were not used, because the head is not responsive to environmental stimuli such as physical activity (26). Regional measures derived from total-body scans at age 9.9 yr were also examined. The coefficient of variation for TBLH BMC was 0.8% based on 120 repeat scans.
Other variables
The mothers, partners, and grandparents race and ethnic group, mothers highest educational qualification, and paternal social class were recorded at 32 wk gestation as described elsewhere (24). Gender was obtained from birth notifications. At the time of the DXA scan and measurement of the anthropometric variables, the childs age was calculated from the date of birth and date of attendance at the research clinic. Puberty was assessed by self-completion questionnaires using diagrams based on Tanner staging of pubic hair distribution for boys and breast development for girls. In view of the major influence of puberty on DXA-derived parameters, the present study was based on the subgroup of children in whom pubertal-stage information was available within 3 months before the age 9.9-yr clinic visit.
Statistical analysis
A two-tailed unpaired t test was used to assess differences between Tanner stage 1 and 2 boys in height, weight, and DXA-derived measures, and differences between Tanner stage 1, 2, and 3 girls were evaluated using an F test. Change (
) in height, weight, and DXA values between ages 9.9 and 11.8 yr was expressed as percent increase, obtained by dividing the difference between these two values by the baseline measurement. Linear regression analysis was used to examine associations between total body fat mass and TBLH bone area and BMC at age 9.9 yr and TBLH
bone area between ages 9.9 and 11.8 yr. Analyses were performed separately in boys and Tanner stage 1, 2, and 3 girls and adjusted for age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (maternal education and paternal social class) with or without height and/or total-body lean mass, with TBLH bone area or BMC as the dependent variable. For these regression models, standardized continuous variables (minus mean, divided by SD) were used for fat mass, TBLH bone area, TBLH BMC, height, and lean mass. Coefficients are therefore per SD increase in dependent variable. R2 values presented are the adjusted R2 and represent the proportion of variability in the dependent variable explained by the statistical model. P value for test for trend was calculated by treating the quartiles of fat mass as a continuous variable in the regression models. Interactions between variables were assessed by including a multiplicative interaction term in the regression models and calculating the likelihood ratio test. All statistical analyses were performed with STATA 8.0.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
We then examined the relationship between total-body fat mass at age 9.9 yr, and TBLH
bone area over the following 2 yr by comparing DXA scan results obtained at age 9.9 yr with those at age 11.8 yr. In our minimally adjusted model, a strong positive association was observed between fat mass and TBLH
bone area in boys and girls combined (Table 3
). Analysis of TBLH
bone area according to fat mass quartile revealed a linear dose-response relationship between these two variables (results not shown). An equivalent relationship was observed between fat mass and TBLH
BMC to that seen for TBLH
bone area. In separate analyses of boys and Tanner stage 1, 2, and 3 girls, fat mass was positively related to TBLH
bone area and
BMC in boys and stage 1 girls, but negative associations were observed in Tanner stage 2 and 3 girls. Once again, coefficients were lower in boys compared with Tanner stage 1 girls, but this difference attenuated after adjustment for lean mass.
|
bone area and
BMC (Table 3
bone area and
BMC after adjusting for change in height and/or lean mass, although regression coefficients were lower than in minimally adjusted analyses. In Tanner stage 2 and 3 girls, the inverse association between fat mass and TBLH
bone area and
BMC in minimally adjusted analyses was attenuated to a greater or lesser extent by adjustment for change in height and/or lean mass. Nevertheless, a strong negative association persisted between fat mass and TBLH
bone area in Tanner stage 3 girls after adjusting for change in height and/or lean mass.
Statistical analysis confirmed that the association between fat mass and TBLH
bone area interacted with puberty, both in minimally adjusted analyses and after adjustment for change in height and/or lean mass (likelihood ratio test P value = 0.001). In addition, similar results were obtained using an alternative model to represent change between ages 9.9 and 11.8 yr, in which DXA results at age 11.8 yr were adjusted for DXA measures at age 9.9 yr by linear regression analysis (results not shown). Finally, cross-sectional analyses were performed based on DXA results obtained at age 11.8 yr, which revealed similar relationships between fat mass and TBLH bone area to those seen at age 9.9 yr (results not shown).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a recent report based on young adult women (5), fat mass was positively related to areal BMD and BMC independently of lean mass. This observation is consistent with our observation that fat mass is positively related to bone area, in view of the strong positive relationship between bone size and both areal BMD and BMC. On the other hand, several previous investigations have reported reductions in areal BMD, BMC, and/or bone size in obese children after adjusting for lean mass or body weight (8, 10, 11, 12, 13). There are two possible explanations for this apparent discrepancy in relation to the present findings. First, because fat mass, lean mass, and skeletal parameters are all highly correlated, large numbers are required to detect independent influences of fat mass on bone size, whereas the majority of previous studies were relatively small and underpowered. Second, several previous studies used methods for adjusting for lean mass that may have limited validity, for example by including weight in the same regression model as fat or lean mass.
Any tendency for fat mass to stimulate radial bone growth is expected to result in a greater long-bone cross-sectional area, which is in turn predicted to improve biomechanical strength. Consequently, the relationship between fat mass and bone size in childhood that we observed might have important implications for the risk of sustaining fragility fractures in later life. At first sight, this conclusion would appear inconsistent with previous reports that obesity is associated with an increased risk of fracture in children (7, 8) and that children with repeated forearm fractures have increased levels of obesity (9). It is possible that these apparently conflicting observations reflect the fact that whereas fat mass generally acts to stimulate periosteal bone growth, there is a subset of children where this response is defective and in whom fracture risk is increased. Hence, bone size relative to fat mass, rather than either of these factors alone, may be the predominant determinant of fracture risk in children. Consistent with this interpretation, in additional studies based on the ALSPAC cohort, TBLH bone area as measured at age 9.9 yr was inversely related to the risk of fracture over the following 2 yr after adjusting for fat mass but not in unadjusted analyses (results not shown). Another explanation may be that although fat mass stimulates periosteal bone growth, obese children are more prone to falls, and there have been reports that obese boys have reduced stability, increased postural sway, and poorer balance compared with nonobese boys (27, 28).
In early pubertal girls, a positive relationship between fat mass and skeletal growth was not seen, and a negative association was observed between these two parameters in Tanner stage 3 girls. This interaction with puberty in girls may reflect an altered effect of fat mass on bone mineral accrual in the presence of rising estrogen levels, through mechanisms that remain to be elucidated. In light of the positive association reported between fat mass and bone mass as measured in young adult women (5), it is possible that our findings represent a transitory alteration in the relationship between fat mass and bone growth during puberty. Because only a very small proportion of boys had entered puberty at the time of baseline assessments, it was not possible to determine whether this apparent reversal of the relationship between fat mass and skeletal growth at the onset of puberty is common to both sexes.
Mechanisms whereby fat mass stimulates periosteal growth include leptin production by adipocytes, in light of evidence that leptin stimulates osteoblast differentiation (29). In support of this possibility, leptin levels have been reported to be positively associated with bone area and change in bone area in girls aged 813 yr (30), and in elderly populations, leptin levels were found to be inversely related to fracture risk (31) and positively related to bone mass and bone size (32). On the other hand, leptin has also been reported to act as a negative regulator of bone formation via a central nervous system pathway (33).
Alternatively, fat mass may be a marker of other endocrine factors that affect bone. For example, fat mass in prepubertal children is related to serum levels of IGF-I and estrogen, both of which are known to influence skeletal growth (34). In addition, total fat mass and the proportion of trunk vs. leg fat are greater in girls, presumably because of differences in levels of sex hormones (34). However, because total, trunk, and trunk vs. limb fat mass showed similar associations with bone size, and no interaction was observed with gender, the present study provides no evidence that fat mass is acting as a surrogate marker for endocrine exposure in terms of its effects on bone size. Another mechanism whereby fat mass stimulates periosteal bone formation is via the additional mechanical strain resulting from greater body weight. In support of this possibility, in a recent study of 18-yr-old men, fat mass was positively associated with cross-sectional area of the tibia as measured by pQCT, whereas a negative association was observed at the radius, suggesting that fat mass stimulates periosteal bone formation only at weight-bearing sites (6). However, in this study, fat mass showed a positive association with bone area as measured at age 9.9 yr at the upper as well as lower limb.
Fat mass and skeletal size are related to confounding factors such as socioeconomic factors (24). We attempted to account for these influences by adjusting for certain socioeconomic indicators but cannot exclude residual confounding. Because data were only available for analysis in approximately 30% of the original cohort, our results may be biased because of losses to follow-up. However, this would only have led to a spurious association between fat mass and bone growth if this relationship was different among those children who were lost compared with the remainder of the cohort, which is considered unlikely. Finally, the association between fat mass and height-adjusted bone area, which we interpreted as reflecting an association between fat mass and periosteal bone growth, requires confirmation by additional studies in which cross-sectional area is measured directly using techniques such as pQCT.
In summary, we found that in boys and Tanner stage 1 girls, total-body fat mass at age 9.9 yr is positively related both to TBLH bone area as measured at age 9.9 yr and gain in bone size over the following 2 yr. Because this association persisted after adjusting for both lean mass and height, our findings suggest that fat mass is an important positive independent determinant of periosteal bone formation in prepubertal children. In contrast, a positive relationship between fat mass at age 9.9 yr and subsequent gain in bone size was not observed in Tanner stage 2 and 3 girls, suggesting the onset of puberty leads to attenuation of the tendency for fat mass to stimulate periosteal growth.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online April 18, 2006
Abbreviations: ALSPAC, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children; BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density; DXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; pQCT, peripheral quantitative computed tomography; TBLH, total body less head.
Received February 13, 2006.
Accepted April 7, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Powell, D. Ma, and G. Jones Determinants of Skeletal Age Deviation in a Cross-Sectional Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 521 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Morrison and V. R. Schoffl Physiological responses to rock climbing in young climbers Br. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2007; 41(12): 852 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. K Pollock, E. M Laing, C. A Baile, M. W Hamrick, D. B Hall, and R. D Lewis Is adiposity advantageous for bone strength? A peripheral quantitative computed tomography study in late adolescent females Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1530 - 1538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Richert, T. Chevalley, D. Manen, J.-P. Bonjour, R. Rizzoli, and S. Ferrari Bone Mass in Prepubertal Boys Is Associated with a Gln223Arg Amino Acid Substitution in the Leptin Receptor J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4380 - 4386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Janicka, T. A. L. Wren, M. M. Sanchez, F. Dorey, P. S. Kim, S. D. Mittelman, and V. Gilsanz Fat Mass Is Not Beneficial to Bone in Adolescents and Young Adults J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 143 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |