help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2005-1725
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wittrup, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nordestgaard, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wittrup, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nordestgaard, B. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipid
Right arrow Cardiovascular Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 4 1438-1445
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Combined Analysis of Six Lipoprotein Lipase Genetic Variants on Triglycerides, High-Density Lipoprotein, and Ischemic Heart Disease: Cross-Sectional, Prospective, and Case-Control Studies from the Copenhagen City Heart Study

Hans H. Wittrup1, Rolf V. Andersen1, Anne Tybjærg-Hansen, Gorm B. Jensen and Børge G. Nordestgaard

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev University Hospital (H.H.W., R.V.A., B.G.N.), DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital (A.T.-H.), DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; and Copenhagen City Heart Study, Bispebjerg University Hospital (A.T.-H., G.B.J., B.G.N.), DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Børge G. Nordestgaard, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark. E-mail: brno{at}herlevhosp.kbhamt.dk.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Genetic variants in lipoprotein lipase may affect triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD).

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of T(–93)G, G(–53)C, Asp9Asn, Gly188Glu, Asn291Ser, and Ser447Ter lipoprotein lipase genotypes on triglycerides, HDL, and IHD.

Design: The cross-sectional study involved 9004 adults. The prospective study consisted of 8817 adults developing 1001 IHD events over 23 yr. The case-control study involved 7818 non-IHD individuals vs. cohorts of 915 and 1062 IHD patients, respectively.

Setting: The study was performed in the Danish general population (the Copenhagen City Heart Study).

Participants: IHD was angina pectoris or myocardial infarction.

Main Outcome Measures: Triglycerides, HDL, and IHD were the main outcome measures.

Results: Cross-sectionally, triglycerides varied by genotype with 1.27 mmol/liter in women and 1.22 mmol/liter in men. HDL cholesterol varied by genotype with 0.49 mmol/liter in women and 0.60 mmol/liter in men. Prospectively, 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined vs. noncarriers had a hazard ratio for IHD of 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2–2.3]; 291Ser and 447Ter did not change IHD risk. In the case-control study, combining the cohorts of IHD patients, 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined vs. noncarriers had an odds ratio for IHD of 1.5 (CI, 1.2–2.1). 291Ser and 447Ter did not change IHD risk. Stratified for apolipoprotein E genotype, the odds ratios for IHD in 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined vs. noncarriers were 2.6 (CI, 1.2–5.5) among {epsilon}32 individuals and 2.4 (CI, 1.4–4.1) among {epsilon}43 individuals.

Conclusions: Genetic variation in lipoprotein lipase is associated with differences in plasma triglycerides greater than 1 mmol/liter and differences in HDL cholesterol greater than 0.5 mmol/liter. A 1.6-fold risk of IHD in 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined is influenced by apolipoprotein E genotype.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
LIPOPROTEIN LIPASE (LPL) degrades triglycerides contained in chylomicrons and very low density lipoproteins, whereas precursors of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles are formed (1, 2). Almost 100 structural variations in the lipoprotein lipase gene have been identified. Most of these have been restricted to a few families with the chylomicronemia syndrome (1), but the Asp9Asn, Gly188Glu, Asn291Ser, and Ser447Ter substitutions have been widely described (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Furthermore, the functional promoter variants T(–93)G (in linkage disequilibrium with Asp9Asn in Caucasians) (7) and G(–53)C may also be common (1). These variants are associated with either decreased [T(–93)G, G(–53)C, Asp9Asn, Gly188Glu, and Asn291Ser] or increased (Ser447Ter) LPL activity, because of changes in the amount of enzyme produced, the specific activity, or enzyme binding to lipoproteins (1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11).

These six common genetic variants in LPL, therefore, may all affect levels of triglycerides and HDL (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), and consequently, together could represent one of the most important genetic influences on the risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Because these variants have most often been studied one at a time, an understanding of the combined influence of LPL variation on triglyceride and HDL levels is sparse. Furthermore, because the risk of IHD mainly has been examined using family, cross-sectional, case-control, or case-referent designs (4, 5), the influence of LPL genetic variation on the risk of IHD prospectively is limited.

We first investigated cross-sectionally the combined influence of T(–93)G, G(–53)C, Asp9Asn, Gly188Glu, Asn291Ser, and Ser447Ter LPL variants on plasma lipoprotein levels in 9004 individuals from the adult Danish general population (12). Second, we studied the risk of IHD prospectively in 8817 general population participants with 1001 IHD events during 23 yr of follow-up. Previously, we examined these variants [except G(–53)C] with respect to the odds ratio for IHD in case-control studies one at a time (13, 14, 15, 16, 17); however, we never before used a prospective design on the general population with Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios. Third, we performed two case-control studies in which 7818 non-IHD individuals were compared with IHD patient cohorts of 915 and 1062 patients, respectively. In prospective and case-control studies of the risk of IHD, we only examined the most common genotypes.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Design

We used three different designs: 1) cross-sectional: the association between LPL genetic variation and lipid and lipoprotein levels was examined cross-sectionally in the entire general population cohort (n = 9004; Table 1Go); 2) prospective: the risk of IHD was examined prospectively within this cohort (n = 8817), excluding those with IHD before study entry and those with rare genotypes (n = 187); and 3) case-control: the risk of IHD was also examined in two case-control studies separately (n = 915 and 1062 cases vs. 7818 controls) as well as combined (n = 1977 cases vs. 7818 controls), excluding participants with rare genotypes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Characteristics of participants

 
Subjects

For cross-sectional and prospective studies, we studied, respectively, 9,004 and 8,817 individuals (55% women) participating in the Copenhagen City Heart Study (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17) (Table 1Go). Participants gave written informed consent. This cohort was drawn randomly from the Copenhagen Central Population Register to obtain an age-stratified representative sample of the adult Danish general population. Of the 17,180 individuals invited, 58% participated, 54% gave blood, and 52% were genotyped for all six genetic variants for the present study.

Among the participants, 1083 have been recorded with IHD; of those, 82 were diagnosed before study entry and were thus excluded from the prospective study. Information on diagnoses of IHD (World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases, 8th edition, codes 410–414; 10th ed, codes I20–25) were gathered from 1976 through 1999 from the Danish National Hospital Discharge Register, the Danish National Register of Causes of Death, and medical records from general practitioners and hospitals.

For case-control studies, we included an additional 915 patients with IHD (26% women) ascertained through referral for coronary angiography (13, 14, 15, 17) (Table 1Go). Of the 992 patients referred, 96% had IHD, 94% were genotyped for all six genetic variants, and 92% with common genotypes were included in statistical analyses. IHD was diagnosed by experienced cardiologists based on characteristic symptoms of stable angina pectoris according to the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (18) on the basis of location, character, and duration of pain and the relation of pain to exercise plus at least one of the following: severe stenosis on coronary angiography (>70% stenosis of at least one coronary vessel or >50% stenosis of the left main coronary artery), previous myocardial infarction, or positive exercise electrocardiography test. Case-control studies were performed separately for this group of IHD patients (n = 915) and the IHD patients described above (ascertained from the general population; n = 1062) as well as for the two groups combined (all cases combined equal 1977); 7818 participants without IHD from the Copenhagen City Heart Study were used as controls (Table 1Go).

In all groups of participants, more than 99% were white, and roughly 99% were of Danish descent. The studies were approved by Danish ethical committees and were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The number of individuals included in the various analyses presented in this paper differs slightly depending on the availability of data.

DNA analyses

Genotyping was described previously for five of the genetic variants: T(–93)G (15), Asp9Asn (15), Gly188Glu (14), Asn291Ser (13), and Ser447Ter (17). Using the principle of a previously designed method for analyzing DNA pooled from 10–20 individuals (14, 19), the promoter variant G(–53)C was detected in such pools by allele-specific PCR on genomic DNA using the sense primer 5'-GTTGGCAGGGTTGATCCTCAT-3', the antisense primer 5'-TTCCCTTGAGGAGGAGGAAGA-3', and the mutation-specific antisense primer 5'-GACTGGAAATATGCAAATAAAACTG-3' (mutation site in underlined italics and additional mismatch underlined only). DNA from individuals from pools testing positively for the G(–53)C variant were reanalyzed separately using identical end primers, digesting the PCR product with BclI, and separating on a 3% agarose gel. Apolipoprotein E genotyping was described previously (20).

Other measurements

Blood samples from participants of the Copenhagen City Heart Study were drawn in the nonfasting state, whereas blood samples from patients with IHD were drawn in the fasting state. Colorimetric and turbidimetric assays were used to measure levels of total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein AI, and apolipoprotein B (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Hypertension was defined as the use of antihypertensive medication or blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg or above. Diabetes mellitus was defined as self-reported disease treated with insulin, oral hypoglycemic agents, or diet. The body mass index was weight divided by height squared.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and Stata software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Two-sided P < 0.05 was considered significant. Correction for multiple comparisons was made by the Bonferroni method. A priori, we stratified by gender; however, to increase the statistical power when analyzing the risk of IHD, we also examined the two genders combined. Variation in levels of lipids and lipoproteins across LPL genotypes was evaluated using nonparametric tests, because neither triglyceride levels, HDL cholesterol levels, nor apolipoprotein AI levels completely follow a normal distribution. We tested for overall difference between genotypes using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, which showed that levels of triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein AI differed significantly between genotype groups. We therefore performed post hoc two-genotype comparisons using the Mann-Whitney U test. We tested for interaction between LPL genotype and a range of cardiovascular risk factors one at a time [age, total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein(a), triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein AI, fibrinogen, body mass index, glucose, alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity at work, physical activity at leisure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, menopause (women), use of diuretics, use of heart medication, use of antihypertensive medication, cholesterol-lowering therapy, and hormonal replacement therapy (women)], in the prediction of triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein AI levels, using two-factor (genotype by risk factor) interaction terms in an analysis of covariance. To obtain an approximately normal distribution, triglycerides and lipoprotein(a) were transformed logarithmically before these analyses.

Cumulative incidence of IHD as a function of age was plotted using Kaplan-Meier curves, with the log-rank test as a measure of statistical significance between genotypes. Cox regression analyses examined the role of genotype in time to first IHD event using the hazard ratios in the prospective study. Interaction of LPL genotype with gender and the cardiovascular risk factors mentioned above on IHD risk was also examined using two-factor interaction terms.

Unconditional logistic regression analysis examined the association between LPL genotype and risk of IHD in case-control studies. Analyses were made adjusting for 1) age only, 2) age and triglyceride levels, and 3) age and HDL cholesterol levels. Analyses made after stratification for apolipoprotein E genotype were adjusted for age. Interactions of LPL genotype with gender, apolipoprotein E genotype, and the cardiovascular risk factors mentioned above on IHD risk were also examined using two-factor interaction terms.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Among the large number of possible genotypes we only observed 16, and only five genotypes had a frequency of more than 1% (Table 2Go). 9Asn was always found in combination with –93G [this combination is subsequently called 9Asn (with –93G) or *9]; 14 individuals carried –93G without 9Asn. Counting 9Asn (with –93G) as one variant, no individual carried more than two variants, compatible with a model in which each genetic variant is entirely separated from the others, forming an individual haplotype. The calculated frequencies of these haplotypes were 85.9% for noncarriers, 9.9% for 447Ter, 2.5% for 291Ser, 1.5% for 9Asn (with –93G), 0.12% for –53C, 0.08% for –93G, and 0.03% for 188Glu.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Frequency of LPL genetic variants in cross-sectional study of the general population

 
Triglycerides and HDL in cross-sectional study of the general population

Plasma triglycerides varied as a function of genotype in both women and men, with the highest plasma levels in 188Glu heterozygotes and the lowest levels in 447Ter homozygotes (by ANOVA, P < 0.001 for both genders; Fig. 1Go); the absolute difference between these levels was 1.27 mmol/liter in women and 1.22 mmol/liter in men. Plasma HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein AI levels also varied by genotype, but with the lowest levels in 188Glu heterozygotes and the highest in 447Ter heterozygotes and homozygotes (by ANOVA, P < 0.001 and P = 0.003; Fig. 1Go); the HDL cholesterol variation from the highest to the lowest level was 0.49 mmol/liter in women and 0.60 mmol/liter in men, whereas for apolipoprotein AI, the maximal variation was 16 mg/dl in women and 24 mg/dl in men. When we excluded individuals with diabetes mellitus, the results were similar (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Percent difference ({Delta}) in levels of triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein AI in individuals with different LPL genotypes vs. noncarriers (N/N) in a cross-sectional study. Absolute values of differences from N/N levels are given below each panel. Mean levels for N/N individuals are shown at the baseline to the right. 447, 447Ter; 291, 291Ser; *9, 9Asn (with –93G); –53, –53C; –93, –93G; 188, 188Glu. The ANOVA used was the Kruskal-Wallis test.

 
On post hoc Mann-Whitney U tests, 447/N individuals were different from 291/N, *9/N, as well as N/N individuals in levels of triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein AI in both women and men (Table 3Go). The same applied to 291/N individuals compared with N/N individuals (except for triglycerides in men) and 447/447 individuals (except for apolipoprotein AI in women). Additionally, levels of triglycerides and HDL cholesterol were different in 447/447 men from *9/N and N/N men. After Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, only two-genotype comparisons with P < 0.001 remained significant. Thus, the borderline significance found for comparisons of the small genotype groups with other genotype groups disappeared after this correction. We observed no plausible multiplicative bivariate interaction between LPL genotypes and lipid and nonlipid cardiovascular risk factors in the prediction of plasma triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein AI levels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. P values of post hoc Mann-Whitney U tests for two-genotype comparisons of levels of triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein AI as shown in Fig. 1Go

 
IHD in prospective study of the general population

During 23 yr of follow-up, there were 1001 IHD events among 8817 participants with the most common genotypes, who were free of IHD at study entry. Combining heterozygotes and homozygotes, Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a cumulative incidence of IHD at age 75 yr of 32% for 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined compared with 18% for noncarriers (log-rank, P = 0.005; Fig. 2Go); equivalent cumulative incidences for 291Ser and 447Ter heterozygotes and homozygotes combined did not differ from that of noncarriers. Cox regression analyses adjusted for age showed a hazard ratio for IHD in 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined vs. noncarriers of 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2–2.3], whereas 291Ser and 447Ter heterozygotes and homozygotes combined vs. noncarriers did not confer altered IHD risk (Table 4Go). After stratification by gender, women and men with 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined vs. noncarriers had hazard ratios of 1.6 (CI, 1.0–2.8) and 1.7 (CI, 1.1–2.7), respectively. Analyzing only participants without diabetes mellitus gave similar results (Table 4Go). There was no statistical evidence for interaction between LPL genotype and gender (or other cardiovascular risk factors) in the prediction of IHD risk.


Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Kaplan-Meier curves showing cumulative incidence of IHD for LPL genotypes in the prospective study. The number of subjects (No.) at risk at the beginning of each 10-yr interval and the number of events within each 10-yr interval are shown beneath the graphs. N/N, Noncarrier; 447, 447Ter/N and 447Ter/447Ter; 291, 291Ser/N and 291Ser/291Ser; *9, 9Asn (with –93G)/N and 9Asn (with –93G)/9Asn (with –93G).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Age-adjusted Cox regression analyses of risk of IHD in prospective study

 
IHD in case-control studies

Age-adjusted logistic regression analyses using a cohort of 934 IHD patients as the case group, genders combined, showed an odds ratio of 1.6 (CI, 1.1–2.3) for 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined vs. noncarriers (Table 5Go); 291Ser and 447Ter did not confer altered IHD risk. After stratification by gender, 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined vs. noncarriers had odds ratios for IHD of 1.2 (CI, 0.6–2.4) in women and 2.3 (CI, 1.4–3.6) in men. Equivalent analyses using the 1083 participants with IHD from the Copenhagen City Heart Study as the case group showed odds ratios of 1.5 (CI, 1.0–2.2) for genders combined, 1.4 (CI, 0.8–2.5) for women only, and 1.7 (CI, 1.0–3.0) for men only. Because both case-control studies gave similar results, we combined the case groups in our other analyses. Analyses using the combined groups of 1977 IHD patients showed odds ratios for 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined vs. noncarriers of 1.6 (CI, 1.2–2.1) for genders combined, 1.3 (CI, 0.8–2.1) for women alone, and 2.1 (CI, 1.4–3.1) for men alone. Analyzing only participants without diabetes mellitus gave similar results (Table 5Go). Additional adjustment for levels of plasma triglycerides and HDL cholesterol also gave similar results (data not shown). There was no statistical evidence for interaction between LPL genotype and gender (or other cardiovascular risk factors) in the prediction of IHD risk.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Age-adjusted logistic regression analyses of risk of IHD in case-control studies

 
After stratification for apolipoprotein E genotype with the two genders combined, odds ratios of IHD in 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined vs. noncarriers were 2.6 (CI, 1.2–5.5) for {epsilon}32 individuals, 1.3 (CI, 0.9–2.0) for {epsilon}33 individuals, and 2.4 (CI, 1.4–4.1) for {epsilon}43 individuals (Table 6Go). There was no statistically significant interaction between LPL genotype and apolipoprotein E genotype in the prediction of IHD risk.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6. Age-adjusted logistic regression analyses of risk of IHD in combined case-control study stratified for apolipoprotein E genotype

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study produced three novel observations. 1) Among 16 different LPL genotypes in the general population, only five of them with a frequency above 1%, we demonstrated that genotype is associated with differences in plasma triglycerides greater than 1 mmol/liter and differences in HDL cholesterol greater than 0.5 mmol/liter. 2) When analyzed prospectively in the general population, 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygous and homozygous individuals combined compared with noncarriers had a 1.6-fold risk of IHD. 3) The combination of 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygosity and homozygosity with {epsilon}32 or {epsilon}43 apolipoprotein E genotypes conferred 2.5-fold IHD risk.

Triglycerides and HDL

Numerous previous studies have documented that 188Glu, 9Asn (with –93G), and 291Ser alleles increase plasma triglycerides and reduce HDL cholesterol levels compared with the noncarrier allele (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), in accordance with decreased plasma LPL activity in carriers of such alleles (1, 2, 3, 5). Likewise, it is well documented that the 447Ter allele vs. the noncarrier allele causes a reduction in plasma triglycerides and an increase in HDL cholesterol (2, 3, 4, 5), in accordance with increased LPL expression without changing specific activity in carriers of this allele (2, 9). A novel aspect of the current study is that we evaluated all these alleles together with the –93G and –53C promoter variants on triglycerides and HDL cholesterol levels in a large sample from the general population. This allowed us to demonstrate clinically important large differences in plasma triglycerides and HDL cholesterol levels caused by these LPL genetic variants. Because of this strong influence on levels of two important cardiovascular risk factors, genetic variation in LPL probably represents an important common genetic influence on risk of IHD.

IHD

The observation that 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined vs. noncarriers had increased risk of IHD is very plausible indeed, because 1) it is compatible with previous results obtained mainly in case-control studies (3, 4, 5, 6); 2) we could document this finding in both women and men in the prospective study; 3) because 9Asn leads to increased plasma triglycerides and reduced HDL cholesterol levels (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), this variant mechanistically may lead to more severe atherosclerosis and consequently IHD; 4) 9Asn may also promote atherosclerosis via enhanced bridging function and augmented monocyte adhesion (11); 5) our case-control studies also documented increased risk of IHD associated with the 9Asn variant; and 6) even after correction for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method, 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined exhibited significantly increased risk of IHD in our prospective as well as case-control studies.

The apparent augmentation of the effect of 9Asn (with –93G) on IHD risk by apolipoprotein E {epsilon}32 and {epsilon}43 seems biologically plausible, because, like 9Asn (with –93G), {epsilon}32 and {epsilon}43 are associated with elevations in plasma triglycerides in our sample (20, 21). The combination of 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygosity and homozygosity with {epsilon}32 or {epsilon}43 apolipoprotein E genotypes could not be tested with sufficient statistical power in the prospective study because of the low number of individuals with these relatively rare genotypes.

Limitations

Despite our large prospective and case-control studies, due to limited statistical power we still may have been unable to document minor influences on the risk of IHD. For example, because both 291Ser and 447Ter heterozygosity and homozygosity influence plasma levels of triglycerides and HDL cholesterol, even larger studies than ours may be able to document small influences in IHD risk by these genetic variants. Likewise, due to small numbers, we excluded rare genotypes in the present analyses of IHD risk and, therefore, cannot exclude the possibility that 188Glu or the –93G (without 9Asn) and –53C functionally important promoter variants could influence the risk of IHD. A previous meta-analysis showed that 188Glu heterozygosity was associated with a 5-fold risk of IHD (4).

Conclusions

This study documents that LPL genetic variation is an important modulator of plasma triglycerides, plasma HDL cholesterol, and risk of IHD at the same scale or larger than the influence of the apolipoprotein E polymorphism (20, 22). 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygotes and homozygotes combined showed a 1.6-fold risk of IHD in prospective as well as case-control studies. Also important, we document that LPL 9Asn (with –93G) heterozygosity and homozygosity combined with {epsilon}32 or {epsilon}43 apolipoprotein E genotypes, found in one of 100 individuals, confers 2.5-fold IHD risk.

There are no potential conflict of interests for any of the authors.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Danish Heart Foundation and the Danish Chief Physician Johan Boserup and Lise Boserups Foundation.

There are no potential conflicts of interest for any of the authors.

First Published Online January 17, 2006

1 H.H.W. and R.V.A. contributed equally to this study. Back

Abbreviations: CI, 95% Confidence interval; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IHD, ischemic heart disease; LPL, lipoprotein lipase.

Received August 1, 2005.

Accepted January 10, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Brunzell JD, Deeb SS 2001 Familial lipoprotein lipase deficiency, apo C-II deficiency, and hepatic lipase deficiency. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The metabolic, molecular bases of inherited disease, 8th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2789–2816
  2. Merkel M, Eckel RH, Goldberg IJ 2002 Lipoprotein lipase: genetics, lipid uptake, and regulation. J Lipid Res 43:1997–2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Fischer RM, Humphries SE, Talmud PJ 1997 Common variation in the lipoprotein lipase gene: effects on plasma lipids and risk of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 135:145–159[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Hokanson JE 1999 Functional variants in the lipoprotein lipase gene and risk of cardiovascular disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 10:393–399[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Wittrup HH, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG 1999 Lipoprotein lipase mutations, plasma lipids and lipoproteins, and risk of ischemic heart disease. A meta-analysis. Circulation 99:2901–2907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kastelein JJP, Ordovas JM, Wittekoek ME, Pimstone SN, Wilson PWF, Gagné SE, Larson MG, Schaefer EJ, Boer JM, Gerdes C, Hayden MR 1999 Two common mutations (D9N, N291S) in lipoprotein lipase: a cumulative analysis of their influence on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in men and women. Clin Genet 56:297–305[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Hall S, Chu G, Miller G, Cruickshank K, Cooper JA, Humphries SE, Talmud PJ 1997 A common mutation in the lipoprotein lipase promoter, –93T/G, is associated with lower plasma triglyceride levels and increased promoter activity in vitro. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17:1969–1976[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Yang W-S, Nevin DN, Iwasaki L, Peng R, Greg Brown B, Brunzell JD, Deeb SS 1996 Regulatory mutations in the human lipoprotein lipase gene in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia and coronary artery disease. J Lipid Res 37:2627–2637[Abstract]
  9. Zhang H, Henderson H, Gagne SE, Clee SM, Miao L, Liu G, Hayden MR 1996 Common sequence variants of lipoprotein lipase: standardized studies of in vitro expression and catalytic function. Biochim Biophys Acta 1302:159–166[Medline]
  10. Peterson J, Ayyobi AF, Ma Y, Henderson H, Reina M, Deeb SS, Santamarina-Fojo S, Hayden MR, Brunzell JD 2002 Structural and functional consequences of missense mutations in exon 5 of the lipoprotein lipase gene. J Lipid Res 43:398–406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Fischer RM, Benhizia F, Schreiber R, Makoveichuk E, Putt W, Al-Haideri M, Deckelbaum RJ, Olivecrona G, Humphries SE, Talmud PJ 2003 Enhanced bridging function and augmented monocyte adhesion by lipoprotein lipase N9: insights into increased risk of coronary artery disease in N9 carriers. Atheroslerosis 166:243–251
  12. Schnohr P, Jensen G, Lange P, Scharling H, Appleyard M 2001 The Copenhagen City Heart Study. Østerbroundersøgelsen. Tables with data from the third examination 1991–1994. Eur Heart J 3(Suppl H):1–83
  13. Wittrup HH, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Abildgaard S, Steffensen R, Schnohr P, Nordestgaard BG 1997 A common substitution (Asn291Ser) in lipoprotein lipase is associated with increased risk of ischemic heart disease. J Clin Invest 99:1606–1613[Medline]
  14. Nordestgaard BG, Abildgaard S, Wittrup HH, Steffensen R, Jensen G, Tybjærg-Hansen A 1997 Heterozygous lipoprotein lipase deficiency. Frequency in the general population, effect on plasma lipid levels, and risk of ischemic heart disease. Circulation 96:1737–1744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Wittrup HH, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Steffensen R, Deeb SS, Brunzell JD, Jensen G, Nordestgaard BG 1999 Mutations in the lipoprotein lipase gene associated with ischemic heart disease in men. The Copenhagen City Heart Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19:1535–1540[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wittrup HH, Nordestgaard BG, Sillesen H, Schnohr P, Tybjaerg-Hansen A 2000 A common mutation in lipoprotein lipase confers a 2-fold increase in risk of ischemic cerebrovascular disease in women but not in men. Circulation 101:2393–2397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wittrup HH, Nordestgaard BG, Steffensen R, Jensen G, Tybjaerg-Hansen A 2002 Effect of gender on phenotypic expression of the S447X mutation in LPL: the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Atherosclerosis 165:119–126[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology 1997 Management of stable angina pectoris: recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 18:394–413[Free Full Text]
  19. Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Steffensen R, Meinertz H, Schnohr P, Nordestgaard BG 1998 Association of mutations in the apolipoprotein B gene with hypercholesterolemia and the risk of ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med 338:1577–1584[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Frikke-Schmidt R, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Steffensen R, Jensen G, Nordestgaard BG 2000 Apolipoprotein E genotype: {epsilon}32 women are protected while {epsilon}43 and {epsilon}44 men are susceptible to ischemic heart disease. The Copenhagen City Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1192–1199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG, Agerholm-Larsen B, Schnohr P, Tybjærg-Hansen A 2000 Context-dependent and invariant associations between lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins and apolipoprotein E genotype. J Lipid Res 41:1812–1822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Song Y, Stampfer MJ, Liu S 2004 Meta-analysis: apolipoprotein E genotypes and risk for coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med 141:137–147[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
G. S. Sagoo, I. Tatt, G. Salanti, A. S. Butterworth, N. Sarwar, M. van Maarle, J. W. Jukema, B. Wiman, J. J. P. Kastelein, A. M. Bennet, et al.
Seven Lipoprotein Lipase Gene Polymorphisms, Lipid Fractions, and Coronary Disease: A HuGE Association Review and Meta-Analysis
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2008; 168(11): 1233 - 1246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. Frikke-Schmidt, B. G. Nordestgaard, M. C. A. Stene, A. A. Sethi, A. T. Remaley, P. Schnohr, P. Grande, and A. Tybjaerg-Hansen
Association of Loss-of-Function Mutations in the ABCA1 Gene With High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels and Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease
JAMA, June 4, 2008; 299(21): 2524 - 2532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. Kathiresan, O. Melander, D. Anevski, C. Guiducci, N. P. Burtt, C. Roos, J. N. Hirschhorn, G. Berglund, B. Hedblad, L. Groop, et al.
Polymorphisms Associated with Cholesterol and Risk of Cardiovascular Events
N. Engl. J. Med., March 20, 2008; 358(12): 1240 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wittrup, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nordestgaard, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wittrup, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nordestgaard, B. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipid
Right arrow Cardiovascular Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals