help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2005-1830
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/4/1336    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orwoll, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Orwoll, E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRADIOL
*TESTOSTERONE
Related Collections
Right arrow Male Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 4 1336-1344
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Testosterone and Estradiol among Older Men

Eric Orwoll, Lori C. Lambert, Lynn M. Marshall, Kathy Phipps, Janet Blank, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Jane Cauley, Kris Ensrud, Steve Cummings for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study Group

Bone and Mineral Unit, Oregon Health & Science University (E.O., L.C.L., L.M.M., K.P., J.B.), Portland, Oregon 97239; University of California, San Diego (E.B.-C.), San Diego, California 92103; University of Pittsburgh (J.C.), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213; Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Minnesota (K.E.), Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401; and California Pacific Medical Center (S.C.), San Francisco, California 94115

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Eric Orwoll, M.D., CR113, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park, Portland, Oregon 97239. E-mail: orwoll{at}ohsu.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Testosterone and estradiol levels decline with age in men. This change may affect multiple clinical outcomes, but there have been few reports of the distribution and correlates of testosterone and estradiol concentrations in elderly men.

Objective: The purpose of these studies was to assess sex steroid levels in a large cohort of older men.

Design: We conducted a cross-sectional cohort evaluation.

Setting: Community-dwelling men were studied at six academic medical centers in the United States.

Participants: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study is a prospective cohort of men aged at least 65 yr. In these studies, a randomly selected stratified subsample of 2623 participants was analyzed.

Main Outcome Measures: We assessed levels of total and free testosterone and estradiol and SHBG.

Results: Age was inversely associated with free testosterone and free estradiol levels (P for trend = 0.001 for both). Notably, at any age, there was substantial variation in levels of each hormone. Free testosterone levels were lower in men with greater body mass index, lower SHBG, and poorer self-reported health status and in those of Asian race. Free estradiol concentrations were lower in men with lower body mass index and higher SHBG levels. Free estradiol and free testosterone were modestly correlated (r = 0.20; P < 0.001), but at any level of free testosterone, there was considerable variation in free estradiol levels.

Conclusions: This is the largest cohort of older men in which sex steroid levels are available, and it demonstrates that testosterone and estradiol, and their free fractions, tend to decline with age even among older men. However, substantial variation is also present. The relationships between sex steroid levels and their consequences in aging are likely to be complex.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CONCENTRATIONS OF SEX steroids in serum decline progressively with age in men, apparently as a result of complex alterations in reproductive physiology (1, 2, 3, 4), secondary causes of gonadal dysfunction and lifestyle factors (5, 6), and changes in the levels of binding proteins (7). The relative importance of these changes remains controversial, but these modifications in sex steroid levels have been postulated to underlie, at least in part, other biological processes that occur concomitantly with male aging (e.g. a decline in bone mass and an increase in fracture risk; a decline in muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance; increased abdominal adiposity and insulin resistance; impairments in cognition and mood; reductions in sexual function; and an increase in frailty and disability) (8). In support of this hypothesis, treatment of hypogonadism in younger and older men may result in an improvement in some relevant measures (e.g. osteopenia, sexual dysfunction, and muscle weakness) (8, 9, 10). Nevertheless, the relevance of the decline in sex steroid levels with aging remains uncertain, and the benefits of sex steroid supplementation in older men are unproven (11).

To some extent, an understanding of the relationships between sex steroid levels and aging, and the opportunity to design intervention studies to examine the benefits of testosterone supplementation, has been limited by a dearth of studies of aged men. Most reports of sex steroid levels with aging involved middle-aged men, often highly selected, nonrepresentative of the general population, and geographically limited (12, 13, 14, 15, 16). Few men older than age 65 yr have been studied despite the fact that many of the adverse effects postulated to be caused by sex steroid insufficiency generally occur relatively late in life. Moreover, the associations between aging and gonadal function in men are based primarily on studies in which total testosterone was the major outcome variable assessed. There is less information available concerning bioavailable and free testosterone levels. Similarly, it has become apparent that estrogen probably has important effects in older men, and there is even less information about estradiol in older men.

The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS), a prospective cohort study of men aged at least 65 yr, is designed to identify risk factors for fractures and for other aging-related conditions. Here we report the distribution of total, free, and bioavailable testosterone and estradiol concentrations, as well as of SHBG levels, at baseline in a sample of 2623 participants. These results expand the information available concerning variation in sex steroids among older U.S. men and should serve as the foundation for additional longitudinal studies of the effects of sex steroids on important outcomes as well as set the stage for trials of sex steroid administration in elderly men.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study population

The design of the MrOS has been described (17). Briefly, the MrOS cohort consists of 5995 community-dwelling, ambulatory U.S. men aged 65 yr or older. Participants were intended, to the extent possible with a volunteer cohort, to be representative of the population of older men in the communities from which they were recruited. Eligibility criteria were 1) ability to walk without the assistance of another, 2) absence of bilateral hip replacements, 3) ability to provide self-reported data, 4) anticipated residence near a study site for the duration of follow-up, 5) absence of a medical condition that would result in imminent death, and 6) ability to understand and sign an informed consent.

Approximately 1000 participants were recruited at each of six academic medical centers: University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. Recruitment efforts focused on community mailings and were supplemented with a variety of community outreach and educational activities (18). At the baseline clinic visit, participants completed questionnaires regarding medical history, current medication use, and lifestyle characteristics (17). Height and weight were measured, and fasting morning serum was collected. The Institutional Review Board at each center approved the study protocol, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

MrOS participants whose serum was used for the measurement of sex steroids were selected using a stratified sampling design. Strata were clinic site (each of six sites), race (white or nonwhite), and availability of a complete set of skeletal imaging procedures (to be used in future analyses of the effects of sex steroids on skeletal change). Within each stratum, participants were sampled with known probability. All nonwhite participants were sampled, and those with complete skeletal imaging were oversampled. The sample target was 2643 participants, and a sample of 2623 (99%) was achieved.

Laboratory methods

Serum was prepared immediately after phlebotomy and stored at –70 C. All samples remained frozen until assayed. Assays were performed at the Oregon Health & Science University General Clinical Research Center by a single technician. Pooled serum controls were included in every assay. Total testosterone was assayed using a solid-phase 125I RIA (Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA) with a detectable range of 10–1600 ng/dl, interassay coefficient of variation (CV) of 8.2%, and intraassay CV of 5.4%; total estradiol by ultrasensitive RIA (Diagnostic Systems Laboratory Inc., Webster, TX) with a detectable range of 2.5–750 pg/ml, interassay CV of 13.3%, and intraassay CV of 8.5%; SHBG by immunometric assay (Diagnostic Products) with a detectable range of 0.2–180 nM, interassay CV of 5.3%, and intraassay CV of 3.3%; and albumin using a Beckman LX 20 analyzer (Beckman-Coulter Instruments, High Wycombe, UK United Kingdom) with an interassay CV of 3.4% and intraassay CV of 1.6%.

Duplicate aliquots from each participant’s serum were assayed and the two results averaged. Samples for testosterone were repeated (in duplicate) when there was a 40% or greater difference between initial assay duplicates. Estradiol measures were repeated when the difference between duplicates was greater than 100% and the means of the duplicates were less than 15 pg/ml or when the mean of the duplicates was greater than 15 pg/ml and there was a 40% difference between replicates. Results from the repeat analyses were averaged with the original results, and 235 of 2623 (8.9%) estradiol samples met repeat criteria and 21 of 2623 (0.8%) testosterone samples met repeat criteria. Estradiol values in two samples fell below the standard curve and were reported as half the lowest standard (i.e. 1.25 pg/ml).

Measures of free and non-SHBG-bound (bioavailable) testosterone, and of free and bioavailable estradiol, were calculated using the mass action equations described by Sodergard et al. (19). In these equations, the possible binding of other steroids to SHBG was disregarded. Free and non-SHBG-bound (bioavailable) estradiol was calculated taking the concentration of testosterone into account. The association constants of testosterone and estradiol used in the equations were taken from Vermeulen et al. (20).

Statistical analyses

Crude means and SDs were calculated. The distributions of sex steroids and SHBG were found to be roughly normal. Pearson partial correlations and least-squared means were adjusted for stratification variables (clinic site, race, and availability of imaging of skeletal sites) to account for any variation present because of the sampling scheme (21).

Multivariate regression models included the stratification variables and additional covariates measured at the baseline examination: age, race, body mass index (BMI), current alcohol consumption, smoking status, and health status. For multivariate analyses examining total and free testosterone levels, estradiol was not included as a predictor in the models because testosterone serves as the major precursor of estradiol in men. SHBG was included as a predictor in multivariate regression models of sex steroids. Trend analyses were performed for sex steroids using linear contrasts after categorization into quintiles. Standardized regression coefficients (standardized to SD) for the continuous variables (age, BMI, alcohol consumption, and sex steroid concentrations) from the multivariate models are reported to facilitate the comparison of the strength of association. With the exception of the demonstration of the sex steroid levels in the entire cohort, men treated with androgens or GnRH agonists were excluded from all analyses.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Participant characteristics

The average age of the study sample was 73 yr (Table 1Go), and 389 (15%) were age 80 or older. Approximately 75% were Caucasian. Most reported themselves to be in excellent or good health compared with their peers. There were few current smokers, but a large proportion had smoked in the past. Alcohol consumption was four drinks per week on average. With the exception of race, distributions of these characteristics were not significantly different from those in the entire MrOS cohort.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Characteristics of 2623 MrOS participants for whom sex steroid measurements were made

 
Population distributions of sex steroids and SHBG

The means (± SD) of total and free testosterone and estradiol, albumin, and SHBG are shown in Table 1Go, and the population distributions of total sex steroid levels and SHBG are in Fig. 1Go. The distributions of free and bioavailable fractions followed similar patterns (data not shown). There was a wide range of total testosterone levels, including a small (n = 58; 2.2%) and distinct subset of men with very low testosterone levels (<100 ng/dl or 3.4 nmol/liter). The majority of these participants (n = 50; 86%) had a history of prostate cancer treated with androgen ablation therapy. When these participants were excluded, the distribution of each variable was essentially normal. This small group of men with prostate cancer and men with a self-reported history of androgen use (n = 33) were not included in subsequent analyses. Total estradiol levels were also variable, but the range was somewhat less broad than with total testosterone, and there was no obvious subgroup with very low levels.


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Distribution of sex steroids and SHBG among 2623 men aged 65 and older in the MrOs cohort. A, Testosterone. Seven observations are above 38 nmol/liter and are not shown. Testosterone levels are shown in SI units, with indicators corresponding to commonly considered levels in metric units also shown. B, Estradiol. Nine observations are above 165 pmol/liter and are not shown. C, SHBG.

 
The correlation between serum total testosterone and total estradiol was weak (r = 0.17) but significant (P < 0.001) (Table 2Go). There was a similarly wide variation apparent in the relationship between free testosterone and free estradiol levels (r = 0.20) (Fig. 2Go). Serum free estradiol levels in the men with free testosterone levels in the lowest quartile ranged from 0.26–4.95 pmol/liter (0.07–1.35 pg/ml), whereas free estradiol levels in the men with free testosterone levels in the highest quartile ranged from 0.12–7.75 pmol/liter (0.03–2.11 pg/ml). Bioavailable and free steroid levels were highly correlated (estradiol and testosterone, r = 0.93 and r = 0.84, respectively). Subsequent analyses are reported for free sex steroid levels, but analyses with bioavailable levels yielded equivalent results.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Pearson partial correlations among sex steroids and SHBG1 (n = 2540)

 

Figure 2
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. The relationship between free testosterone and free estradiol concentrations (n = 2540). Observations from participants with total testosterone less than 100 ng/dl and a history of prostate cancer and participants who reported androgen use are omitted.

 
Correlates of sex steroid levels and SHBG

The relationships between sex steroid levels, age, and other baseline measures are shown in Table 3Go and Fig. 3Go. Both testosterone and estradiol concentrations were lower in older men, a trend that was more marked in levels of free steroids (test for trend: total estradiol, P < 0.001; free estradiol, P < 0.001; free testosterone, P < 0.001) with a particularly low association between age and total testosterone (test for trend, P = 0.27). On the other hand, increasing age was associated with higher SHBG levels (Fig. 3EGo). Although aging was associated with lower sex steroid and higher SHBG levels, the correlation coefficients with age were modest (Table 3Go), and there was a considerable variability in levels at any age. Figure 4Go shows the proportion of men that have total testosterone levels less than 100 ng/dl, 200 ng/dl, and 300 ng/dl as a function of 5-yr increments of age. The proportion of men with the lowest levels of testosterone progressively increases with advancing age. Approximately 3% of men 65 yr and older had total testosterone levels less than 200 ng/dl (6.9 nmol/liter), although nearly 17% of men had levels less than 300 ng/dl (10.5 nmol/liter). It has been suggested that levels of bioavailable estradiol less than 40 pmol/liter may be deleterious for bone mass in men (22, 23), and 43% of the MrOS population fell below that level (34% in men 65–69 yr and 64% in men >80 yr).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Pearson partial correlation coefficients between sex steroid levels and participant characteristics1

 

Figure 3
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. The relationship of sex steroids and SHBG concentrations to age. A, Total testosterone; B, free testosterone; C, total estradiol; D, free estradiol; E, SHBG. Boxes denote the median and interquartile ranges; whiskers extend from the 5–95th percentiles.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. The proportion of men with total testosterone levels less than 100 ng/dl, 200 ng/dl, and 300 ng/dl by age category. Participants who reported androgen use are omitted. The testosterone cutoffs correspond to the following SI units: 100 ng/dl = 3.47 nmol/liter; 200 ng/dl = 6.94 nmol/liter; and 300 ng/dl = 10.41 nmol/liter.

 
Higher BMI was related to lower testosterone and SHBG levels and higher estradiol concentrations (Table 3Go). Body weight followed the same trend (data not shown). Total and free testosterone levels were slightly higher in men who rated their health status as excellent/good compared with those who rated it as fair/poor/very poor and were slightly higher in current smokers (although there was a very weak negative correlation between testosterone levels and pack years of cigarette consumption) (Table 3Go). SHBG levels were slightly higher in these two groups as well. Estradiol levels did not differ by health or smoking status, but levels were associated (free and total) with higher reported current alcohol consumption. No sex steroid measure was related to the CAGE index of alcohol dependence (not shown) (44, 45).

Mean sex steroid levels differed by racial categories (Table 4Go). Total testosterone and age-adjusted testosterone did not differ significantly by race; however, after adjusting for both BMI and age, there were racial differences (P < 0.001). Total testosterone levels were lower in Asian men and higher in African-American and Hispanic men. Free testosterone levels differed significantly by race (unadjusted P < 0.001; age- and BMI-adjusted P < 0.001) following the same trends as for total testosterone. No significant differences in total estradiol by race category were found (unadjusted P = 0.29; age- and BMI-adjusted P = 0.55). Unadjusted free estradiol differed slightly by race (P < 0.03) with whites having the lowest free estradiol concentration; however, after adjusting for age and BMI, the differences by race category diminished. SHBG concentrations differed by race category (unadjusted P < 0.02; age- and BMI-adjusted P < 0.001) with Asian men having the lowest SHBG concentration and African-American and white men having the highest mean concentrations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Racial differences in testosterone, estradiol, and SHBG: the MrOS cohort

 
Multivariate models

In multivariate analyses (Tables 5Go and 6Go) in which age, race, BMI, SHBG, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and health status were considered, 38% of the variance in total testosterone was explained, primarily by the strong positive association with SHBG. Higher age, higher BMI, and worse health status were associated with slightly lower total testosterone levels. Only 18% of the variation in free testosterone concentrations was explained by the variables considered here; age, BMI, SHBG, and free estradiol were each weakly related to free testosterone levels. Increasing levels of BMI positively, but slightly, influenced free estradiol. A larger proportion of free estradiol levels were related to free testosterone (positively) and SHBG (negatively) levels. The associations between free testosterone, SHBG, and free estradiol levels are shown in Fig. 5Go. Men with the highest free testosterone and lowest SHBG levels had free estradiol levels approxi-mately 3-fold higher than those with the lowest free testosterone and highest SHBG concentrations. The relationships between free testosterone and free estradiol, and between SHBG and estradiol, were linear. The concentrations of SHBG were slightly higher with greater age, were positively related to total testosterone levels, and were negatively associated with free estradiol levels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Relation of testosterone to demographic, body size, and lifestyle characteristics: the MrOS cohort1

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6. Relation of estradiol to demographic, body size, and lifestyle characteristics: the MrOS cohort1

 

Figure 5
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. The relationships among concentrations of free testosterone, free estradiol, and SHBG.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There is considerable current interest in expanding the understanding of sex steroid physiology in older men. To our knowledge, this study represents the largest cohort of older men in whom total and free levels of testosterone and estradiol have been measured. We confirm many previous findings, but by virtue of the large population of older men available, we have also expanded knowledge concerning these associations.

Testosterone levels, particularly levels of free testosterone, were lower in men of greater age. The rate of decline (approximately 10% per decade based on multivariate models) is similar to that reported in other cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (13, 15). Many older men had total testosterone levels less than those in young men. The expected range of free testosterone in young men is not well established, but because the reduction in free testosterone levels with age is more pronounced than it is for total testosterone, the proportion of older men with free testosterone levels falling below the young normal range would be expected to be greater. Nevertheless, there was broad variation in the levels of sex steroid concentrations in older men, and only a modest amount of the variability in levels was explained by age. Many older men have levels considered normal for young men. The level of testosterone that represents sufficiency is unknown and may vary among individuals and between tissues (muscle, bone, adipose, neural, etc.).

There is little information concerning estradiol levels in older men. In MrOS, estradiol concentrations were lower as age increased, and the correlation between age and free or total estradiol was stronger than between age and testosterone levels. This decline in estradiol levels (particularly free or bioavailable levels) is similar to some reports (12, 14, 24, 25, 26, 27), but other studies have noted stable (5, 28, 29) or even rising (30) estradiol levels with age. The reasons for these differences are unclear. As we observed with testosterone, there was a wide range of serum estradiol levels, and there is very little information concerning what level of estradiol is optimal. Some data suggest that there is a threshold level of bioavailable estradiol (40 nmol/liter) below which the rate of loss in bone density is accelerated (22, 23). In our population, 43% had estradiol levels in the range postulated to be related to bone loss.

By virtue of aromatase activity, testosterone serves as the major precursor of estradiol in men (31). In fact, men with the highest free testosterone concentrations had approximately twice the free estradiol levels as men with the lowest levels of free testosterone. However, the simple correlation between free estradiol and free testosterone was relatively modest, indicating that circulating free testosterone is but one determinant of estradiol levels. It is possible that differences in aromatase activity, either genetic or otherwise, may have contributed to this finding (32). In addition, the clearance rate of estradiol may exert an important influence, and polymorphisms in the gene coding for the estrogen-degrading enzyme catechol-O-methyltransferase are associated with variation in estradiol levels (33).

SHBG binding would be expected to reduce the availability of testosterone for aromatization, and a very robust relationship was seen among free estradiol, free testosterone, and SHBG. However, higher SHBG levels were related to lower estradiol levels independent of free testosterone, suggesting that either SHBG has effects on estradiol levels over and above its testosterone-binding properties or that SHBG is actually a surrogate for other variables that may affect both SHBG and estradiol levels. These relationships are very similar to those recently reported by de Ronde et al. (7) and emphasize the physiological importance of SHBG binding to testosterone.

Body composition has been related to male sex steroid physiology in several ways (34). In the current studies, increasing BMI was related to lower total and free testosterone levels, higher total and free estradiol levels, and slightly higher levels of SHBG. These relationships are known from previous studies (35), although they have not been so clearly demonstrated, and whereas univariate correlations suggested a reasonably strong relationship between BMI and sex steroid levels, multivariate analyses indicated the direct effect of BMI was minimal.

These analyses have a number of strengths. To our knowledge, this study is the largest available evaluation of sex steroid levels in older men. Many of the men studied here are over 80 yr, a segment of the male population that is underrepresented in the available literature but that is increasing steadily. This is also one of the few reports of the distribution of estradiol levels in older men. Well controlled assay methods were used to overcome recognized problems regarding the precision of sex hormone measures (36) and to ensure a high level of confidence in the reliability of the data. An extensive evaluation of the mass action equations was undertaken to ensure the assumptions inherent in the calculations were reasonable and consistently applied, and these calculations yield values that compare well to direct assays of free steroid levels. (37)

There are also weaknesses inherent in these studies, including the cross-sectional design. On the other hand, the large sample size available provides an opportunity to confidently detect associations that can be tested in studies of longitudinal design. Second, the most appropriate methods for the measurement of serum sex steroid concentrations remain controversial. The accurate measurement of sex steroid levels is difficult, and there remains no universally accepted approach (38, 39). It is clear that the use of RIA to measure serum concentrations of estradiol and testosterone, particularly when they are present in low concentrations, yields somewhat different results than do measurements done with non-immunoassay-based techniques such as mass spectrometry (40) (considered the reference standard) or with RIA performed on extracted samples (36). Concern about assay technique is probably less relevant for the measurement of testosterone levels in men, where concentrations are relatively high and inaccuracy using RIA-based methods is low (40). However, estradiol levels in men are low, and some degree of inaccuracy may have resulted by the use of RIAs. Nonetheless, more stringent assay quality control measures were used here than in published comparisons of estradiol measurement methods, and our approach should have reduced imprecision. To whatever extent inaccuracy resulted from the use of RIAs, the true strengths of the relationships reported here between estradiol and other variables may have been underestimated. The assessment of free testosterone levels can be performed in several ways, including by equilibrium dialysis and by calculation from mass action equations (used in the current studies). The two methods give very comparable results (20, 41). Mass action equations also provide calculated bioavailable (albumin-bound plus free) steroid levels. Bioavailable steroid levels in serum can also be assessed by methods involving the precipitation of SHBG-bound steroids followed by the assay of nonprecipitated levels. The two approaches yield similar results, and bioavailable levels are highly correlated with free levels (20, 42). Finally, in the current studies, sex steroid measures were performed on a single morning sample rather than multiple or pooled specimens. Assays on single samples are accurate representations of testosterone levels in older men (43), and thus the results we obtained are likely to be a reasonable reflection of sex hormone levels on the morning of collection. How much variation there is in steroid levels over a longer sampling period is unclear (other parts of the day or over months and years). Finally, despite the fact that our cohort encompasses considerable variety in essential traits and is similar to representative cohorts (e.g. NHANES; http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/Anthropometric%20Measures.htm), the results from the population we have studied may not be generalizable to broader populations of older men.

In conclusion, increasing age in older men is associated with lower levels of total and free estradiol and testosterone, but the variability in sex steroid levels in the population is remarkable. Many older men have levels of sex steroids similar to those reported in young men. Testosterone levels were lower in men with fair/poor health, higher BMI, and lower SHBG levels. Both free testosterone (positively) and SHBG (negatively) were related to free estradiol levels, and men with low free testosterone and high SHBG levels have considerably reduced free estradiol concentrations. Nevertheless, these variables (and others related to body mass and lifestyle) explained only a small fraction of the variation in estradiol levels. The modest correlation between testosterone and estradiol reflects considerable interindividual heterogeneity in the relationship between these two fundamentally important gonadal hormones. Longitudinal evaluations are needed to verify these findings and to determine the relationships of sex steroids to health outcomes in older men.


    Acknowledgments
 
The code for the mass action calculations of free sex steroid concentrations was adapted from that generously provided by Pawel Szulc, M.D., Ph.D. Leah Williams provided able assistance with the preparation of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
The MrOS is supported by National Institutes of Health funding. Support was provided by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, the National Institute on Aging, the National Cancer Institute, and the National Center for Research Resources under the following grant numbers: UO1 AR45580, UO1 AR45614, UO1 AR45632, UO1 AR45647, UO1 AR45654, UO1 AR45583, UO1 AG18197, and M01 RR000334.

First Published Online December 20, 2005

Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CV, coefficient of variation; MrOS, Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study.

Received August 12, 2005.

Accepted December 13, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Tsitouras PD 1987 Effects of age on testicular function. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 16:1045–1059[Medline]
  2. Lamberts SWJ, van den Beld AW, van der Lely A 1997 The endocrinology of aging. Science 278:419–424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Snyder PJ 2001 Effects of age on testicular function and consequences of testosterone treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2369–2372[Free Full Text]
  4. Matsumoto AM2003 Fundamental aspects of hypogonadism in the aging male. Rev Urol 5:s3–s10
  5. Gray A, Feldman HA, McKinlay JB, Longcope C 1991 Age, disease and changing sex hormone levels in middle-aged men: results of the Massachusetts male aging study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:1016–1025[Abstract]
  6. Kaufman JM, Vermeulen A 1997 Declining gonadal function in elderly men. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 11:289–309[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. de Ronde W, van der Schouw YT, Muller M, Grobbee DE, Gooren LJ, Pols HA, de Jong FH 2005 Associations of sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) with non-SHBG-bound levels of testosterone and estradiol in independently living men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:157–162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Liverman CT, Blazer DG 2004 Testosterone and aging: clinical research directions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
  9. Wang C, Cunningham G, Dobs A, Iranmanesh A, Matsumoto AM, Snyder PJ, Weber T, Berman N, Hull L, Swerdloff RS 2004 Long-term testosterone gel (AndroGel) treatment maintains beneficial effects on sexual function and mood, lean and fat mass, and bone mineral density in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2085–2098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Page ST, Amory JK, Bowman FD, Anawalt BD, Matsumoto AM, Bremner WJ, Tenover JL 2005 Exogenous testosterone (T) alone or with finasteride increases physical performance, grip strength, and lean body mass in older men with low serum T. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:1502–1510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Snyder PJ 2004 Hypogonadism in elderly men: what to do until the evidence comes. N Engl J Med 350:440–442[Free Full Text]
  12. Simon D, Preziosi P, Barrett-Connor E, Roger M, Saint-Paul M, Nahoul K, Papoz L 1992 The influence of aging on plasma sex hormones in men: the Telecom study. Am J Epidemiol 135:783–791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Feldman H, Longcope C, Derby C, Johannes C, Araujo A, Coviello A, Bremner W, McKinlay J 2002 Age trends in the level of serum testosterone and other hormones in middle-aged men: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:589–598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ferrini R, Barret-Conner E 1998 Sex hormones and age: a cross-sectional study of testosterone and estradiol and their bioavailable fractions in community-dwelling men. Am J Epidemiol 147:750–754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Harman SM, Metter EJ, Tobin JD, Pearson J, Blackman MR 2001 Longitudinal effects of aging on serum total and free testosterone levels in healthy men. Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:724–731[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Longcope C, Goldfield SR, Brambilla DJ, McKinlay J 1990 Androgens, estrogens, and sex hormone-binding globulin in middle-aged men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:1442–1446[Abstract]
  17. Orwoll ES, Blank JB, Barrett-Connor E, Cauley J, Cummings S, Ensrud K, Lewis C, Cawthon PM, Marcus R, Marshall LM, McGowan J, Phipps K, Sherman S, Stefanick M, Stone K 2005 Design and baseline characteristics of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study: a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men. Contemp Clin Trials 26:569–585[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Blank JB, Cawthon PM, Carrion-Petersen M, Harper L, Johnson JP, Mitson E, Delay RR 2005 Overview of recruitment for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS). Contemp Clin Trials 26:557–568[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Sodergard R, Backstrom T, Shanbhag V, Carstensen H 1982 Calculation of free and bound fractions of testosterone and estradiol-17ß to human plasma proteins at body temperature. J Steroid Biochem 16:801–810[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Vermeulen A, Verdonck L, Kaufman JM 1999 A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3666–3672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Korn EL, Graubard BI 1999 Analysis of health surveys. New York: John Wiley, Sons
  22. Gennari L, Merlotti D, Martini G, Gonnelli S, Franci B, Campagna S, Lucani B, Dal Canto N, Valenti R, Gennari C, Nuti R 2003 Longitudinal association between sex hormone levels, bone loss, and bone turnover in elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:5327–5333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Khosla S, Melton III J 2002 Estrogen and the male skeleton. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1443–1450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Khosla S, Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Klee GG, Riggs BL 1998 Relationship of serum sex steroid levels and bone turnover markers with bone mineral density in men and women: a key role for bioavailable estrogen. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2266–2274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Khosla S, Melton III J, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM 2001 Relationship of serum sex steroid levels to longitudinal changes in bone density in young versus elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3555–3561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. van den Beld AW, de Jong FH, Grobbee DE, Pols HA, Lamberts SW 2000 Measures of bioavailable serum testosterone and estradiol and their relationships with muscle strength, bone density, and body composition in elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:3276–3282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Leifke E, Gorenoi V, Wichers C, Von Zur Muhlen A, Von Buren E, Brabant G 2000 Age-related changes of serum sex hormones, insulin-like growth factor-1 and sex-hormone binding globulin levels in men: cross-sectional data from a healthy male cohort. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 53:689–695[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Muller M, den Tonkelaar I, Thijssen JH, Grobbee DE, van der Schouw YT 2003 Endogenous sex hormones in men aged 40–80 years. Eur J Endocrinol 149:583–589[Abstract]
  29. Belanger A, Candas B, Dupont A, Cusan L, Diamond P, Gomez JL, Labrie F 1994 Changes in serum concentrations of conjugated and unconjugated steroids in 40- to 80-year-old men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:1086–1090[Abstract]
  30. Bjornerem A, Straume B, Midtby M, Fonnebo V, Sundsfjord J, Svartberg J, Acharya G, Oian P, Berntsen GK 2004 Endogenous sex hormones in relation to age, sex, lifestyle factors, and chronic diseases in a general population: the Tromso Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:6039–6047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Simpson ER 2000 Role of aromatase in sex steroid action. J Mol Endocrinol 25:149–156[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Simpson ER, Zhao Y, Agarwal VR, Michael MD, Bulun SE, Hinshelwood MM, Graham-Lorence S, Sun T, Fisher CR, Qin K, Mendelson CR 1997 Aromatase expression in health and disease. Recent Prog Horm Res 52:185–213; discussion 213–214[Medline]
  33. Lorentzon M, Eriksson AL, Mellstrom D, Ohlsson C 2004 The COMT val158met polymorphism is associated with peak BMD in men. J Bone Miner Res 19:2005–2011[Medline]
  34. Laaksonen DE, Niskanen L, Punnonen K, Nyyssonen K, Tuomainen TP, Valkonen VP, Salonen JT 2005 The metabolic syndrome and smoking in relation to hypogonadism in middle-aged men: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:712–719[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Vermeulen A, Kaufman JM 2002 Diagnosis of hypogonadism in the aging male. Aging Male 5:170–176[Medline]
  36. Stanczyk FZ, Cho MM, Endres DB, Morrison JL, Patel S, Paulson RJ 2003 Limitations of direct estradiol and testosterone immunoassay kits. Steroids 68:1173–1178[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Van Uytfanghe K, Stockl D, Kaufman JM, Fiers T, De Leenheer A, Thienpont LM 2005 Validation of 5 routine assays for serum free testosterone with a candidate reference measurement procedure based on ultrafiltration and isotope dilution-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Clin Biochem 38:253–261[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Matsumoto AM, Bremner WJ 2004 Serum testosterone assays: accuracy matters. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:520–524[Free Full Text]
  39. Taieb J, Benattar C, Birr AS, Lindenbaum A 2002 Limitations of steroid determination by direct immunoassay. Clin Chem 48:583–585[Free Full Text]
  40. Taieb J, Mathian B, Millot F, Patricot MC, Mathieu E, Queyrel N, Lacroix I, Somma-Delpero C, Boudou P 2003 Testosterone measured by 10 immunoassays and by isotope-dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in sera from 116 men, women, and children. Clin Chem 49:1381–1395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Morley JE, Patrick P, Perry 3rd HM 2002 Evaluation of assays available to measure free testosterone. Metabolism 51:554–559[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Miller KK, Rosner W, Lee H, Hier J, Sesmilo G, Schoenfeld D, Neubauer G, Klibanski A 2004 Measurement of free testosterone in normal women and women with androgen deficiency: comparison of methods. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:525–533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Vermeulen A, Verdonck G 1992 Representativeness of a single point plasma testosterone level for the long term hormonal milieu in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 74:939–942[Abstract]
  44. Ewing JA 1984 Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA 252:1905–1907[Abstract]
  45. Buchsbaum DG, Buchanan RG, Welsh J, Centor RM, Schnoll SH 1992 Screening for drinking disorders in the elderly using the CAGE questionnaire. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:662–665[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
O. P. Almeida, B. B. Yeap, G. J. Hankey, K. Jamrozik, and L. Flicker
Low Free Testosterone Concentration as a Potentially Treatable Cause of Depressive Symptoms in Older Men
Arch Gen Psychiatry, March 1, 2008; 65(3): 283 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. Meier, T. V. Nguyen, D. J. Handelsman, C. Schindler, M. M. Kushnir, A. L. Rockwood, A. W. Meikle, J. R. Center, J. A. Eisman, and M. J. Seibel
Endogenous Sex Hormones and Incident Fracture Risk in Older Men: The Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study
Arch Intern Med, January 14, 2008; 168(1): 47 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. A. Laughlin, E. Barrett-Connor, and J. Bergstrom
Low Serum Testosterone and Mortality in Older Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 68 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. B. Araujo, G. R. Esche, V. Kupelian, A. B. O'Donnell, T. G. Travison, R. E. Williams, R. V. Clark, and J. B. McKinlay
Prevalence of Symptomatic Androgen Deficiency in Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4241 - 4247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Wang, P. Christenson, and R. Swerdloff
Clinical Relevance of Racial and Ethnic Differences in Sex Steroids
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 2433 - 2435.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Rohrmann, W. G. Nelson, N. Rifai, T. R. Brown, A. Dobs, N. Kanarek, J. D. Yager, and E. A. Platz
Serum Estrogen, But Not Testosterone, Levels Differ between Black and White Men in a Nationally Representative Sample of Americans
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 2519 - 2525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
B. B Yeap, O. P Almeida, Z. Hyde, P. E Norman, S A P. Chubb, K. Jamrozik, and L. Flicker
In men older than 70 years, total testosterone remains stable while free testosterone declines with age. The Health in Men Study
Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 156(5): 585 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. G. Travison, A. B. Araujo, V. Kupelian, A. B. O'Donnell, and J. B. McKinlay
The Relative Contributions of Aging, Health, and Lifestyle Factors to Serum Testosterone Decline in Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 549 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. G. Travison, A. B. Araujo, A. B. O'Donnell, V. Kupelian, and J. B. McKinlay
A Population-Level Decline in Serum Testosterone Levels in American Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 196 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. R. Smith
Obesity and Sex Steroids during Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Treatment for Prostate Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 13(1): 241 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Khosla
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin: Inhibitor or Facilitator (or Both) of Sex Steroid Action?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 4764 - 4766.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. J. Litman, S. Bhasin, C. L. Link, A. B. Araujo, J. B. McKinlay, and for the Boston Area Community Health Survey Invest
Serum Androgen Levels in Black, Hispanic, and White Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2006; 91(11): 4326 - 4334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. Orwoll, L. C. Lambert, L. M. Marshall, J. Blank, E. Barrett-Connor, J. Cauley, K. Ensrud, S. R. Cummings, and for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study Group
Endogenous testosterone levels, physical performance, and fall risk in older men.
Arch Intern Med, October 23, 2006; 166(19): 2124 - 2131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. P. Bilezikian
What's Good for the Goose's Skeleton is Good for the Gander's Skeleton.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1223 - 1225.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Pitfalls when interpreting a threshold level for bioavailable estradiol and testosterone.
Willem de Ronde
JCEM Online, 21 Apr 2006 [Full text]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/4/1336    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert m