| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
BRIEF REPORT |
Department of Clinical Nutrition, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany; and Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200 Berlin, Germany
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Matthias Möhlig, M.D., German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam- Rehbruecke, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany. E-mail: mmoehlig{at}mail.dife.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Participants and Intervention: Ten healthy men were included in a crossover intervention study. Four euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps were performed, one without pretreatment, one with prior 2-h lipid infusion, one after pretreatment with 4 g acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and one with ASA pretreatment and prior lipid infusion.
Main Outcome Measure: Lipid-induced insulin resistance was quantified by the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp technique running at least 2 h. Repeated-measures ANOVA on two factors was used for comparison, and results were Bonferroni adjusted for multiple measurements. ASA effects on serum adipocytokines were addressed by comparing the areas under the curves.
Results: Glucose infusion rate (M value) of the control clamp without pretreatment was 6.3 (± 0.6) mg/kg·min. ASA pretreatment did not change glucose infusion rates (P = 0.6). Lipid infusion significantly decreased the M value to 4.1 (± 0.6) mg/kg·min (P = 0.008). After ASA pretreatment and lipid infusion, the M value was 4.8 (± 0.7) mg/kg·min and was significantly improved, compared with the lipid-only clamp (P = 0.036 after Bonferronis adjustment). General biomarkers of inflammatory processes (IL-6, C-reactive protein), the insulin-sensitizing mediator adiponectin, and circulating adiponectin oligomers were unchanged by ASA pretreatment.
Conclusions: ASA pretreatment attenuated lipid-induced insulin resistance in healthy humans. This acute insulin-sensitizing effect of ASA was unrelated to changes of circulating inflammatory markers.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B (NF
B) pathway in human muscle biopsies (2), which might be one of the mechanisms leading to their deleterious effects. Supporting this hypothesis, mice with a partially suppressed NF
B pathway [heterozygous inhibitor of NF
B kinase-ß (IKKß) knockout mice] were protected from lipid-induced insulin resistance (3), although animal experimental data are conflicting (4). Furthermore, the antiinflammatory drug salicylic acid improved lipid-induced insulin resistance in rodents (3, 5), which may be the result of an inhibition of IKKß. To date, we are not aware of studies investigating the effect of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) treatment on lipid-induced insulin resistance and lipid-induced changes in serum adipocytokines in humans.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study was approved by the local ethical committee. Twelve healthy male volunteers were included after written informed consent was given. The volunteers did not take any medication and had normal oral glucose tolerance tests. One volunteer stopped the ASA medication due to abdominal discomfort (recovering after withdrawal), and another volunteer moved away and therefore could not complete the study within the given period. The remaining 10 volunteers were 42.5 (±4.7, 2366) yr old (mean ± SEM, range). Their body mass index was 25.1 (±1.2, 21.231.9) kg/m2, and their waist circumference was 89.8 (±3.8, 76112) cm. Fasting glucose was 4.7 (±0.1, 4.05.2) mmol/liter, fasting insulin was 10.8 (±2.2, 0.924.2) mU/liter, and homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance was 2.3 (±0.5, 0.24.7). Total cholesterol was 5.0 (±0.3, 3.46.6) mmol/liter, high-density lipoprotein was 1.2 (±0.1, 0.81.9) mmol/liter, and triglycerides were 1.2 (±0.2, 0.42.2) mmol/liter. Aspartate-amino-transferase was 26.6 (±3.0, 18.449.7) U/liter, and creatinine was 91.2 (±1.8, 78.996.7) µmol/liter.
One volunteer missed one of the control clamps (ASA pretreatment without lipid infusion, which, however, had no impact on the result of the study (respective M value was replaced by the mean).
Euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp test and intervention
In a crossover design, four clamps were performed after an overnight fast (one clamp without pretreatment, one with a lipid infusion started 2 h before the clamp, one with ASA pretreatment, and one with ASA pretreatment and lipid infusion). Subjects were instructed to maintain normal physical activity the day before the tests and to restrain from strenuous exercise. Euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps were performed using 40 mU/m2·min human insulin (Actrapid, Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark) and a variable infusion of 10% glucose (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) for at least 2 h. Capillary glucose was measured every 5 min using the glucose oxidase method (Dr. Muller, Super GL, Freital, Germany). Steady-state conditions were assumed as soon as capillary glucose was kept constant for at least 30 min within the range of 4.4 ± 0.4 mmol/liter. For lipid infusion 500 ml of a lipid emulsion (Abbolipid 20%, Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany) were supplemented with heparin (Heparin Calcium 0.4 IU/kg body weight; Ratiopharm, Ulm, Germany). Infusion was started 2 h before the clamp at an infusion rate of 90 ml/h. For ASA pretreatment 1 g ASA (CT-Arzneimittel, Berlin, Germany) was dissolved in water and administered orally. The first dose was given 24 h before the test, and the next three doses were given every 8 h for a total ASA amount of 4 g.
All infusions were administered into an antecubital vein, whereas blood for analysis was drawn from a contralateral antecubital vein. Blood was collected before the start of the lipid infusion, immediately before the start of the clamp (120 min lipid infusion), and during the steady-state condition of the clamp. NEFAs were measured in samples taken every 30 min throughout the prior clamp lipid infusion. Blood was centrifuged and immediately frozen at 80 C.
Assays
Plasma NEFAs and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were quantified using a colorimetric assay (NEFA; Wako, Neuss, Germany) or an immunoturbidimetric assay (CRP-Latex; ABX Diagnostics, Montpellier, France) on a Cobas Mira analyzer (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Interassay coefficients of variation were 4.7 and 6.9%. Serum insulin, IL-6, and adiponectin were measured using ELISA (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN; Biovendor, Nashville, TN, respectively). Intraassay coefficients of variation were 8, 10, and 14.7%. Adiponectin oligomers were separated by nonreducing, non-heat-denaturing SDS-PAGE as described (6).
Statistics
Mean ± SEM are presented. Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance was calculated as [fasting insulin (milliunits per liter) x fasting glucose (millimoles per liter)/22.5]. M values of the clamps were calculated as glucose infusion rates (milligrams per minute) during steady-state divided by body weight (kilograms). M values were compared by repeated-measures ANOVA on two factors (ASA pretreatment and lipid infusion), and post hoc contrasts were defined based on estimated marginal means adjusted for multiple comparison according to Bonferroni. Time courses for NEFAs were compared by repeated-measures ANOVA using Bonferronis adjustment. The impact of ASA on the time courses of NEFAs, IL-6, CRP, adiponectin, and adiponectin oligomers were addressed by comparing the areas under the curves (AUCs), calculated by the incremental trapezoidal method. SPSS software (version 8.0; Chicago, IL) was used.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lipid infusion induced substantial insulin resistance with the M value declining from 6.3 ± 0.6 mg/kg·min (clamp without pretreatment) to 4.1 ± 0.6 mg/kg·min during the clamp with lipid infusion (P = 0.008 after Bonferronis adjustment). Interestingly, compared with the clamp with lipid infusion, insulin sensitivity was improved after combined ASA pretreatment and lipid infusion (M value 4.8 ± 0.7 mg/kg·min, P = 0.036 after Bonferronis adjustment) (Fig. 1
). In contrast, without lipid infusion ASA had no effect on insulin sensitivity, and the M value of the clamp with ASA pretreatment, but without lipid infusion (6.0 ± 0.8 mg/kg·min), did not significantly differ from the clamp without pretreatment (P = 0.6).
|
To address the overall antiinflammatory properties of an ASA pretreatment, we also investigated CRP and IL-6 levels, two central markers of inflammation. Furthermore, we investigated ASA effects on adiponectin and adiponectin oligomer distribution because adiponectin is supposed to have additional antiinflammatory properties (7, 8).
ASA pretreatment did not affect the time courses of IL-6, adiponectin, or the distribution of the adiponectin oligomers. The marked increase in IL-6 during the steady-state condition of both clamps about 4 h after start of the lipid infusion is most likely explained by the insertion of a venous catheter, as described earlier (9). CRP was the only marker that tended to differ (P = 0.074). However, somewhat surprisingly there was a trend to increased CRP levels after ASA pretreatment (Table 1
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Within this study, a 4-h lipid infusion induced insulin resistance in the same range as described previously (1). Interestingly, ASA pretreatment resulted in a reduced effect of lipid infusion on insulin sensitivity, with an improvement of insulin sensitivity of about 30%, compared with that after isolated lipid infusion.
NEFA time courses were not affected by ASA. However, despite standardized analytical procedures, we cannot completely exclude that slight differences of ex vivo lipolysis might have resulted in an underestimation of putative differences of NEFA concentrations in vivo. Furthermore, the beneficial effect of ASA was not accompanied by changes in the inflammatory markers IL-6 or CRP investigated here or changes in adiponectin or the adiponectin oligomer distribution.
In vitro and rodent data indicate that IKKß and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase might be molecular targets of ASA (3, 14, 15). In humans, a degradation of I
B (inhibitor of NF
B) in muscle biopsies was reported during lipid infusion (2), suggesting a role of the NF
B pathway in the development of lipid-induced insulin resistance. The inhibition of IKKß by ASA and thus the inhibition of the NEFA-activated NF
B pathway might therefore explain the beneficial effects of ASA on lipid-induced insulin resistance.
Previously effects of ASA on insulin resistance but not lipid-induced insulin resistance were addressed, and controversial results have been published (16, 17, 18, 19), probably due to different doses of ASA used. Furthermore, study designs, cohort characteristics, and methods to determine insulin resistance differed considerably. Insulin resistance (determined by euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp) was found to be unchanged after 3 d treatment with ASA (3 g/d), which is pretty comparable with the 4 g pretreatment used within the study presented here (18). In agreement, we also found no effects of ASA on insulin resistance in the clamps without lipid infusion. Thus, specifically the lipid-induced insulin resistance appears to be attenuated by ASA.
In conclusion, pretreatment with ASA improved lipid-induced insulin resistance in healthy men. This beneficial effect of ASA was not accompanied by any changes in inflammatory markers or in adiponectin or adiponectin oligomer distribution. These data tentatively suggest that effects of ASA on lipid-induced insulin resistance are more likely to be mediated by downstream molecular targets such as IKKß or c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: ASA, Acetylsalicylic acid; AUC, area under the curve; CRP, C-reactive protein; IKKß, inhibitor of NF
B kinase-ß; NEFA, nonesterified free fatty acid; NF
B, nuclear factor-
B.
Received August 26, 2005.
Accepted December 16, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B-
. Diabetes 51:20052011[CrossRef][Medline]
B kinase 2 fails to prevent obesity-induced insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 113:474481[CrossRef][Medline]
B signaling through a cAMP-dependent pathway. Circulation 102:12961301
(TNF
)-induced insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1) serine 307 phosphorylation and insulin resistance in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells. J Biol Chem 278:180186This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Xiao, A. Giacca, and G. F. Lewis The effect of high-dose sodium salicylate on chronically elevated plasma nonesterified fatty acid-induced insulin resistance and {beta}-cell dysfunction in overweight and obese nondiabetic men Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2009; 297(5): E1205 - E1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Anderson and J. Borlak Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets in Steatosis and Steatohepatitis Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2008; 60(3): 311 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Fernandez-Real, A. Lopez-Bermejo, A.-B. Ropero, S. Piquer, A. Nadal, J. Bassols, R. Casamitjana, R. Gomis, E. Arnaiz, I. Perez, et al. Salicylates Increase Insulin Secretion in Healthy Obese Subjects J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2523 - 2530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Manrique, G. Lastra, J. Palmer, M. Gardner, and J. R. Sowers Review: Aspirin and Diabetes Mellitus: revisiting an old player Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 37 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. van der Crabben, G. Allick, M. T. Ackermans, E. Endert, J. A. Romijn, and H. P. Sauerwein Prolonged Fasting Induces Peripheral Insulin Resistance, Which Is Not Ameliorated by High-Dose Salicylate J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 638 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zu, H. Jiang, J. He, C. Xu, S. Pu, M. Liu, and G. Xu Salicylate Blocks Lipolytic Actions of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} in Primary Rat Adipocytes Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2008; 73(1): 215 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |