help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2005-1326
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/3/843    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kupelian, V.
Right arrow Articles by McKinlay, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kupelian, V.
Right arrow Articles by McKinlay, J. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Male Endocrinology
Right arrow Metabolism
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 3 843-850
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Low Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Total Testosterone, and Symptomatic Androgen Deficiency Are Associated with Development of the Metabolic Syndrome in Nonobese Men

Varant Kupelian, Stephanie T. Page, Andre B. Araujo, Thomas G. Travison, William J. Bremner and John B. McKinlay

New England Research Institutes (V.K., A.B.A., T.G.T., J.B.M.), Watertown, Massachusetts 02472; and University of Washington (S.T.P., W.J.B.), Seattle, Washington 98195

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. John B. McKinlay, New England Research Institutes, 9 Galen Street, Watertown, Massachusetts 02472. E-mail: jmckinlay{at}neriscience.com.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background: The metabolic syndrome (MetS), characterized by central obesity, lipid and insulin dysregulation, and hypertension, is a precursor state for cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether low serum sex hormone levels or clinical androgen deficiency (AD) predict the development of MetS.

Methods: Data were obtained from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study, a population-based prospective cohort of 1709 men observed at three time points (T1, 1987–1989; T2, 1995–1997; T3, 2002–2004). MetS was defined using a modification of the ATP III guidelines. Clinical AD was defined using a combination of testosterone levels and clinical signs and symptoms. The association between MetS and sex hormone levels or clinical AD was assessed using relative risks (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using Poisson regression models.

Results: Analysis was conducted in 950 men without MetS at T1. Lower levels of total testosterone and SHBG were predictive of MetS, particularly among men with a body mass index (BMI) below 25 kg/m2 with adjusted RRs for a decrease in 1 SD of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.06–1.87) and 1.65 (95% CI, 1.12–2.42). Results were similar for the AD and MetS association, with RRs of 2.51 (95% CI, 1.12–5.65) among men with a BMI less than 25 compared with an RR of 1.22 (95% CI, 0.66–2.24) in men with a BMI of 25 or greater.

Conclusions: Low serum SHBG, low total testosterone, and clinical AD are associated with increased risk of developing MetS over time, particularly in nonoverweight, middle-aged men (BMI, <25). Together, these results suggest that low SHBG and/or AD may provide early warning signs for cardiovascular risk and an opportunity for early intervention in nonobese men.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE (CAD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are major causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States, with prevalence rates of 6.9% and 6.7%, respectively, and with CAD causing one of every five deaths (1). Unfortunately, by the time these chronic diseases present clinically, irreversible vascular damage has already occurred. It is estimated that type 2 DM is diagnosed, on the average, 4–7 yr after onset (2). To best target prevention strategies, it is critical to identify upstream determinants of disease. The metabolic syndrome (MetS), which incorporates criteria of dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and central adiposity, has been established as a precursor state in which patients meeting the criteria for MetS clearly are at significantly increased risk of developing CAD and DM (3, 4). However, less is known about determinants further upstream; that is, the predictors of developing MetS need to be identified.

In men, aging is associated with a gradual decline in testosterone (T) (5, 6). This decrease accompanies changes in body composition, including increases in fat mass and decreases in lean body mass (7), disorders of insulin and glucose metabolism (8, 9, 10), and dyslipidemia (8, 11). The relationship among T, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes is poorly understood (12). Small intervention trials have demonstrated that exogenous T supplementation in young men lowers high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (13, 14). In contrast, T replacement in older men with low serum T compared with young healthy men, increases lean body mass and decreases fat mass, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein without affecting HDL, all of which may be associated with decreased risk of CVD (15, 16). Moreover, T may have more direct effects on vascular reactivity and cardiac muscle (17, 18). More recently, low serum T and SHBG levels have been directly associated with the MetS, both cross-sectionally (19) and longitudinally (20).

The definition of androgen deficiency (AD) is still a matter of controversy. AD can be defined purely biochemically, using T levels with percentile cutoff values (e.g. 2.5 SD below the range for normal young males), (6) or using only signs and symptoms (21). The problem with the first method is that not all individuals with relatively low T levels are symptomatic. In contrast, symptom questionnaires tend to have low specificity due to the nonspecific nature of the signs and symptoms evaluated by these screening tools (21). A diagnostic algorithm outlined at The Endocrine Society meeting in 2001 was the basis for an alternative operational definition of AD combining both clinical signs and symptoms and measurements of total T and calculated free T (22, 23).

The purpose of these analyses was to determine the relationship between sex hormones or AD and subsequent development of MetS. Data were obtained from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study (MMAS), a large prospective cohort of men aged between 40 and 70 yr at baseline who have been followed for more than 15 yr.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The MMAS is a population-based observational cohort study of aging men observed at three time points: baseline (T1), 1987–1989; first follow-up (T2), 1995–1997; and second follow-up (T3), 2002–2204. The sampling design and field protocol were described previously (24). Briefly, men aged 40–70 yr were randomly selected from 11 cities and towns in the Boston, Massachusetts, area. Men in older age groups were oversampled to provide approximately equal proportions in each decade (40–49, 50–59, and 60–70 yr). At baseline (T1), a total of 1709 men (response rate, 52%) were enrolled in the study. A telephone survey of nonrespondents (n = 206) revealed that they were similar to respondents in general health and prevalence of chronic diseases. At the first follow-up phase (T2), 1496 of the original 1709 men were eligible, and 1156 completed a T2 interview (response rate, 77%). At the second follow-up phase (T3), 1351 men were eligible, of whom 853 were interviewed (response rate, 63%). Median follow-up was 14.4 yr (range, 7.1–16.9 yr).

The sample used for this analysis was obtained as follows. Men not followed at both T2 and T3 were excluded (495 men). An additional 146 men with MetS at baseline were excluded. Finally, 118 men were excluded because of missing data on hormone levels, AD, or potential covariates. The final analysis for this study was conducted on 950 men.

Data collection and measures used

The field protocol for MMAS has been previously described (24). Briefly, a trained field technician/phlebotomist visited each subject in his home and administered a health questionnaire and psychological assessment. Anthropometric data on height, weight, and waist and hip circumferences were obtained using standardized procedures developed for large-scale epidemiological field studies (25). Blood pressure (BP) measurements while the subject was seated were obtained at two points, 25 min apart, during the interview and were averaged. The presence of medical conditions, including diabetes and heart disease, was assessed through self-report. Current prescriptions and nonprescription medications and clinical indication for each were assessed by the field technician. Medications were then coded according to the American Hospital Formulary Service classification (26). MMAS received institutional review board approval, and all participants gave written informed consent.

MetS definition

The MetS was first operationally defined by a World Health Organization Consultant Group (27) and subsequently refined by a National Institutes of Health Expert Panel (referred to as the ATP III guidelines) (28). Available MMAS data permit close adherence to the current ATP III guidelines with the major exception that only nonfasting blood samples were available for analyses, impacting analyses of triglycerides and fasting glucose. Therefore, for the purposes of this analysis, MetS was defined as presence of three or more of the following: 1) waist larger than 40 in.; 2) systolic BP greater than 130 mm Hg, diastolic BP greater than 85 mm Hg, or antihypertensive medication use; 3) HDL cholesterol less than 40 mg/dl or lipid medication use; 4) self-reported diabetes; and 5) triglycerides greater than 150 mg/dl (not available at baseline).

Hormone measurements

Nonfasting blood samples were drawn within 4 h of the subject’s awakening to control for diurnal variation in hormone levels. Two samples were drawn 30 min apart and pooled for analysis to control for episodic secretion (29). Blood was kept in an ice-cooled container for transport and was centrifuged within 6 h. Serum was stored in 5-ml scintillation vials at –20 C, shipped to the laboratory within 1 wk by same-day courier, and stored at –70 C until assay. All hormone measurements were performed at the Endocrine Laboratory of University of Massachusetts Medical Center (Worcester, MA). Total T and SHBG were measured by RIA [Diagnostic Products Corp. (Los Angeles, CA) for total T; Farmos kit for SHBG]. Intraassay coefficients of variation for these assays were 5.4% and 5.0% respectively. Interassay coefficients of variation were 8.0% and 6.0%. Free T was calculated from total T and SHBG measurements using Vermeulen’s method (31).

Definition of AD

An operational definition of AD, based on a diagnostic algorithm presented at the Second Annual Andropause Consensus Meeting (22) and available MMAS data, was constructed. Methods similar to the algorithm proposed by the consensus statement have been reported (30, 31). A detailed description and discussion of this method were published previously (23). Briefly, of the 12 signs/symptoms identified at the consensus meeting, data for eight were available in the MMAS study: loss of libido, depression (defined as current use of antidepressant medication), erectile dysfunction, lethargy, inability to concentrate, sleep disturbance, irritability, and depressed mood. Men were classified as having AD if they met one of the following conditions: 1) at least three signs/symptoms and total T less than 200 ng/dl (6.94 nmol/liter); and 2) at least three signs/symptoms and total T of 200–400 ng/dl (6.94–13.88 nmol/liter) and free T less than 8.91 ng/dl (0.3092 nmol/liter).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics, proportions for categorical variables, and means and SDs for continuous variables were used to describe the baseline total sample (n = 1709) and the analytic sample (n = 950). The purpose of the analysis was to determine whether sex hormone levels or AD at baseline were predictors for incident MetS at T2 or T3. Person-years accumulated from T1 to the year of event or the last contact. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to assess the magnitude of the association between hormone levels (total T, free T, and SHBG) or AD and MetS. For hormone levels, RRs were reported per decrease in 1 SD and for quartiles of the hormone distributions. Multiple regression models, estimated using Poisson regression, were used to adjust for potential confounders. The use of Poisson regression is appropriate in cohort studies where rates and rate ratios for a specified time period are of interest (32). Baseline measures adjusted for in the analysis as potential confounders include age (grouped as 40–49, 50–59, and ≥60 yr of age), body mass index (BMI; categorized as <25, 25–29.9, and ≥30 kg/m2 according to the National Center for Health Statistics definitions for overweight or obese) (33) smoking at baseline (defined as smoking cigarettes, cigars, cigarillos, or pipe) vs. nonsmokers, and subjects’ self-reported health (defined as excellent, very good, good, or fair/poor). A variable, MSscore, was used to indicate the number of conditions within MetS (e.g. high blood pressure or waist >40 in.) present at T1 (zero, one, or two) in subjects who did not meet the full criteria for MetS at baseline and were included in the analysis. Likelihood ratio tests were used to assess the contributions of confounders and interaction terms to the model. Interaction assessment was performed by looking at the difference in magnitude in RRs across strata if the P value from the likelihood ratio test was less than 0.2. All reported RRs and 95% CIs were estimated using Poisson regression. All analyses were conducted using the commercial statistical package Stata 7.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Baseline characteristics of the MMAS sample and the analytic sample are presented in Table 1Go. The cohort was predominantly white, and a majority had been educated beyond high school. Only 5% of the men (n = 49) in the analytic sample had AD at T1. In the analytic sample, most men reported overall good health, with only 4% reporting fair or poor health. Approximately 30% were current smokers. Over 60% had a BMI of 25 or larger. Conversely, only 17% had a waist circumference greater than 40 in. Thirty-eight percent reported elevated blood pressure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. T1 characteristics of the full and analytic study samples

 
Men included in the final analysis sample were slightly younger than the total initial cohort. They also tended to have slightly lower BMI, waist circumference, and blood pressure; reported excellent and very good health more often; and had slightly higher HDL cholesterol concentrations. This was expected, because cases of MetS were excluded at baseline, and men who were deceased or seriously ill were not followed. Forty percent of men in the analysis sample were 40–49 yr old compared with 33% in the total sample.

The occurrence of MetS by baseline risk factors is presented in Table 2Go. Overall, 300 new cases of MetS were reported at T2 and T3. The overall incidence was 25.5/1000 person-years. Age at baseline was not associated with incidence of MetS. Smoking was associated with a moderate increase in risk of MetS with a RR of 1.50 (95% CI, 1.19–1.89). Worse self-reported health was predictive of development of MetS, with the RR increasing from 1.28 (95% CI, 0.97–1.68) for very good health to 2.15 (95% CI, 1.33–3.49) for fair/poor health, with excellent health as the reference category. As expected, BMI and the number of conditions defining MetS at baseline were strong predictors of development of MetS.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Association of T1(1987–1989) measures withMetS at follow-up T2 (1995–1997) or T3 (2002–2004)

 
Associations of MetS with hormone levels (total T, free T, and SHBG) at baseline are presented in Table 3Go. There was an overall trend of increasing risk of MetS with decreasing levels of both total T and SHBG [unadjusted RRs for a decrease in 1 SD were 1.17 (95% CI, 1.04–1.32) and 1.39 (95% CI,1.20–1.61), respectively], but there was no association between free T and MetS (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.87–1.08). Compared with the highest quartile (>75%) of the distributions, the risk of MetS was higher for lower quartiles of total T and SHBG, but not for free T. The increase in risk was more linear for SHBG [RR, 1.69 (95% CI, 1.15–2.46), 1.84 (95% CI, 1.26–2.59), and 2.35 (95% CI, 1.56–3.17) for the lower quartiles] than for total T [RR, 1.18 (95% CI, 0.84–1.67), 1.60 (95% CI, 1.15–2.21), and 1.43 (95% CI, 1.03–2.00)]. Adjusting for potential confounders, the magnitude of the RRs was attenuated, but the overall trends remained the same. The association of both total T and SHBG with MetS seemed to be modified by BMI, with stronger associations observed among men with BMI below 25 (Table 4Go). Adjusted RRs per decrease in 1 SD were 1.41 (95% CI, 1.06–1.87) for total T and 1.65 (95% CI, 1.12–2.42) for SHBG among men with BMI below 25 compared with RRs of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.93–1.23) and 1.13 (95% CI, 0.96–1.32) among men with BMI of 25 or more. Similarly, adjusted RRs for lower quartiles compared with the highest quartile ranged between 1.40 (95% CI, 0.55–3.56) and 2.64 (95% CI, 1.10–6.32) for total T and between 2.89 (95% CI, 0.94–8.87) and 4.65 (95% CI, 1.73–12.48) for SHBG among men with BMI below 25, whereas among men with BMI of 25 or more, adjusted RRs ranged between 1.04 (95% CI, 0.71–1.51) and 1.25 (95% CI, 0.87–1.78) for total T and between 1.10 (95% CI, 0.72–1.66) and 1.35 (95% CI, 0.92–1.98) for SHBG. There was no interaction between free T and BMI.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Association of total T, free T, and SHBG at baseline T1 (1987–1989) with incident MetS at follow-up T2 (1995–1997) or T3 (2002–2004)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Association of total T, free T, and SHBG at baseline T1 (1987–1989) with incident MetS at follow-up T2 (1995–1997) or T3 (2002–2004) by baseline BMI levels

 
Analyses were repeated using the operational definition of AD (Table 5Go). There was no overall association between AD and MetS (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.74–1.92). As with total T and SHBG, there was a stronger association between AD and MetS among men with BMI less than 25 (RR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.17–5.84) than among men with BMI of 25 or more. This effect did not change after adjusting for additional potential confounders (MSscore, age, smoking, and self-reported health). The adjusted RRs for AD were 2.51 (95% CI, 1.12–5.65) when BMI was less than 25 and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.66–2.24) when BMI was 25 or greater.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Association of AD at T1 (1987–1989) with incident MetS at follow-up T2 (1995–1997) or T3 (2002–2004), overall and by baseline BMI levels

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In a population-based cohort of 950 randomly selected, middle-aged men, total T and SHBG levels were associated with the development of MetS. Among nonoverweight men, lower quartiles of total T and SHBG, compared with the highest quartile, showed a 2- to 4-fold increase in risk of developing MetS. Similarly, a 2-fold increase in the risk of MetS was observed among men with both clinical and biochemical AD and BMI less than 25. These relationships were independent of age, smoking, self-reported overall health status, and number of conditions defining MetS. We observed an overall trend of increasing MetS risk with lower total T levels and SHBG levels, but there was no clear threshold effect.

Our results are consistent with other recent studies. Using a cross-sectional study, Muller et al. (19) found a decrease in the risk of MetS with increasing levels of total T and SHBG independent of age, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and BMI (19). Using a longitudinal approach, Laaksonen et al. (20) showed a 2-fold increase in the risk of MetS for the lowest quartile of T compared with the highest, independently of potential confounders, such as CAD, smoking, alcohol consumption, and socioeconomic status (20). Low levels of endogenous sex hormones have also been associated with risk factors for MetS, such as increased central adiposity (19, 34) and insulin resistance (35, 36). Similarly, low total T and SHBG levels have been associated with unfavorable lipid profiles, including increased triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein concentrations (37) and decreased HDL levels (11). We did not find the relationship between free T and MetS reported by others (20), suggesting that the impact of total T on MetS risk is mediated through SHBG. Finally, our observation that the risk of MetS with lower levels of total T or SHBG was substantially higher in men with a low-normal BMI (BMI, <25) suggests that the impact of SHBG or total T on MetS risk is overshadowed by the increased risk of MetS associated with adiposity in more obese men.

The mechanism by which higher levels of SHBG might protect against the development of MetS is unclear. How SHBG and MetS are related is not known; however, it is likely that the increased risk for MetS observed in lean men with lower SHBG levels marks a group with higher insulin levels. This increased insulin resistance would predict increased frequency to develop MetS over time. In vitro studies in human hepatoma cell lines (HepG2) have demonstrated decreased SHBG production in the setting of insulin (38, 39). In vivo diazoxide treatment, resulting in decreased insulin levels, produces a significant increase in SHBG (40), whereas SHBG levels decrease acutely during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp studies (41). Together, these intervention studies suggest that insulin negatively regulates hepatic production of SHBG. In support of this, multiple cross-sectional population studies have demonstrated a negative correlation between SHBG and the development of type 2 diabetes (9, 10, 42); thus, it has been suggested that SHBG may, in fact, act as a surrogate marker for insulin resistance (43, 44).

Our analyses do have a number of limitations, which may explain the discrepancies between our results and others. First, MetS could not be assessed exactly according to the ATP III guidelines, because fasting insulin, glucose, and triglycerides measurements were not available in our dataset. In addition, triglyceride measurements were not available at baseline; thus, MetS assessment was based on only four criteria at that time point. This could result in underestimating the identified new cases of MetS, because some men may have been misclassified as not having MetS at baseline. In addition, using self-reported diabetes to define incident MetS at T2 and T3, rather than fasting glucose above 110 mg/dl probably underestimates the number of men who developed MetS during follow-up, resulting in a bias to the null. Despite the recognized limitation, the approach used in this paper has scientific merit because 1) the ATP III components have always only been suggested guidelines, not an immutable, clinically validated definition; 2) there is continuing debate over which components of MetS should be included, removed, or added; and 3) it is employed as a concept for purposes of epidemiological analysis rather than for clinical purposes. The advantages of the present analysis, cost efficiently using the large already collected MMAS database, clearly outweigh the recognized limitations associated with the measurement of some components.

Our operational definition of clinical AD is not without flaws. The Endocrine Society algorithm calls for the repeat of T measurement when levels are found to be in the intermediate range (200–400 ng/dl). This is clearly not feasible in an observational survey. Unfortunately, the extent and direction of misclassification of men as androgen deficient (and, likewise, not androgen deficient) due to random variability in T levels cannot be known with currently available data. We do not know how T values vary from day to day.

Another possible limitation is the differences between the analysis sample and the original baseline sample, which may affect the generalizability of the results. Given the nature of the questions we sought to answer, it was necessary to define a healthy baseline cohort to establish clearly the temporal sequence between AD and development of MetS. Most exclusions were due to the presence of MetS at baseline and the absence of follow-up. Few men were excluded because of missing information and, as such, are unlikely to affect the results substantially. With regard to generalizability, the MMAS cohort is mostly white and includes men with generally higher socioeconomic status, consistent with the racial and socioeconomic composition of Massachusetts males, aged 40–70 yr at the time of the survey. Longitudinal analyses of the effects of sex steroids on the development of MetS in a more racially diverse group in which the incidence rates of MetS are higher will be an important area of future study.

A final limitation is the small number of MetS cases encountered in some of the categories when assessing the interaction between BMI and quartiles of hormone concentrations or AD, limiting the power to detect statistically significant differences. However, it may be argued that the discrepancy in the magnitude of the association at each level of BMI is more important than the significance of P values (45). When using quartiles of both total T and SHBG, the difference between RRs at different BMI levels were substantial and consistent with the interaction effects observed when using these measures as continuous variables, where the limitation of small number did not apply. Similarly, the difference in the magnitude of the association between AD and MetS was substantially higher among men with AD (adjusted RR, 2.51) than among men with BMI greater than 25 (adjusted RR, 1.22), a difference difficult to dismiss based exclusively on the P value for the interaction term.

There are many strengths to this study. These include most notably the use of a random, population-based sample of men from a defined geographic area, with the advantage of results generalizable to the underlying population. In addition, the longitudinal design of the study allows the temporal sequence among declining sex steroids, AD, and MetS to be clearly examined. Finally, the use of an operational definition of AD has identified individuals seeking clinical care for clinical symptoms of AD who are at risk for other, more morbid, conditions.

In summary, low levels of total T or SHBG are predictive of MetS, with a stronger association observed with SHBG. These results are consistent with previous findings in the literature. We found that the associations between total T, SHBG, and MetS were significantly stronger among men with BMI below 25. Nonobese men with low SHBG or low total T were at 2- to 4-fold increased risk of developing MetS over 15 yr of follow-up. Similarly, AD, defined using a combination of biochemical measures and clinical signs and symptoms, was predictive of MetS, but only among men with BMI less than 25. The fact that we did not find an increased risk of MetS with low SHBG or total T in men with a BMI of 25 or greater suggests that in overweight and obese men, adiposity is the dominant risk factor for developing MetS and supports a role for exercise and weight loss, rather than androgen therapy, to prevent the development of MetS. Low SHBG, total T, or AD may be early markers of MetS in nonobese men, providing a warning sign in men otherwise considered at lower risk of developing MetS and subsequent diabetes or cardiovascular disease.


    Footnotes
 
First Published Online January 4, 2006

Abbreviations: AD, Androgen deficiency; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CAD, coronary artery disease; CI, confidence interval; DM, diabetes mellitus; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; MetS, metabolic syndrome; RR, relative risk; T, testosterone; T1, baseline; T2, first follow-up; T3, second follow-up.

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging (AG-04763) and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-51345 and DK-44995).

Received June 15, 2005.

Accepted December 27, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. 2005 Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2005 update. Dallas: American Heart Association
  2. Harris MI, Klein R, Welborn TA, Knuiman MW 1992 Onset of NIDDM occurs at least 4–7 yr before clinical diagnosis. Diabetes Care 15:815–819[Abstract]
  3. Lorenzo C, Okoloise M, Williams K, Stern MP, Haffner SM 2003 The metabolic syndrome as predictor of type 2 diabetes: the San Antonio heart study. Diabetes Care 26:3153–3159[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Sattar N, Gaw A, Scherbakova O, Ford I, O’Reilly DS, Haffner SM, Isles C, Macfarlane PW, Packard CJ, Cobbe SM, Shepherd J 2003 Metabolic syndrome with and without C-reactive protein as a predictor of coronary heart disease and diabetes in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Circulation 108:414–419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Feldman HA, Longcope C, Derby CA, Johannes CB, Araujo AB, Coviello AD, Bremner WJ, McKinlay JB 2002 Age trends in the level of serum testosterone and other hormones in middle-aged men: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:589–598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Harman SM, Metter EJ, Tobin JD, Pearson J, Blackman MR 2001 Longitudinal effects of aging on serum total and free testosterone levels in healthy men. Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:724–731[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. van den Beld AW, de Jong FH, Grobbee DE, Pols HA, Lamberts SW 2000 Measures of bioavailable serum testosterone and estradiol and their relationships with muscle strength, bone density, and body composition in elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:3276–3282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Tsai EC, Matsumoto AM, Fujimoto WY, Boyko EJ 2004 Association of bioavailable, free, and total testosterone with insulin resistance: influence of sex hormone-binding globulin and body fat. Diabetes Care 27:861–868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Stellato RK, Feldman HA, Hamdy O, Horton ES, McKinlay JB 2000 Testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, and the development of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged men: prospective results from the Massachusetts male aging study. Diabetes Care 23:490–494[Abstract]
  10. Haffner SM, Shaten J, Stern MP, Smith GD, Kuller L 1996 Low levels of sex hormone-binding globulin and testosterone predict the development of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in men. MRFIT Research Group. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Am J Epidemiol 143:889–897[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Zmuda JM, Cauley JA, Kriska A, Glynn NW, Gutai JP, Kuller LH 1997 Longitudinal relation between endogenous testosterone and cardiovascular disease risk factors in middle-aged men. A 13-year follow-up of former Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial participants. Am J Epidemiol 146:609–617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Wu FC, von Eckardstein A 2003 Androgens and coronary artery disease. Endocr Rev 24:183–217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wu FC, Farley TM, Peregoudov A, Waites GM 1996 Effects of testosterone enanthate in normal men: experience from a multicenter contraceptive efficacy study. World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Male Fertility. Fertil Steril 65:626–636[Medline]
  14. Meriggiola MC, Marcovina S, Paulsen CA, Bremner WJ 1995 Testosterone enanthate at a dose of 200 mg/week decreases HDL-cholesterol levels in healthy men. Int J Androl 18:237–242[Medline]
  15. Page ST, Amory JK, Bowman FD, Anawalt BD, Matsumoto AM, Bremner WJ, Tenover JL 2005 Exogenous testosterone (T) alone or with finasteride increases physical performance, grip strength, and lean body mass in older men with low serum T. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:1502–1510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Snyder PJ, Peachey H, Berlin JA, Rader D, Usher D, Loh L, Hannoush P, Dlewati A, Holmes JH, Santanna J, Strom BL 2001 Effect of transdermal testosterone treatment on serum lipid and apolipoprotein levels in men more than 65 years of age. Am J Med 111:255–260[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Sader MA, Griffiths KA, Skilton MR, Wishart SM, Handelsman DJ, Celermajer DS 2003 Physiological testosterone replacement and arterial endothelial function in men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 59:62–67[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Ong PJ, Patrizi G, Chong WC, Webb CM, Hayward CS, Collins P 2000 Testosterone enhances flow-mediated brachial artery reactivity in men with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 85:269–272[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Muller M, Grobbee DE, den Tonkelaar I, Lamberts SW, van der Schouw YT 2005 Endogenous sex hormones and metabolic syndrome in aging men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:2618–2623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Laaksonen DE, Niskanen L, Punnonen K, Nyyssonen K, Tuomainen TP, Valkonen VP, Salonen R, Salonen JT 2004 Testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin predict the metabolic syndrome and diabetes in middle-aged men. Diabetes Care 27:1036–1041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Morley JE, Charlton E, Patrick P, Kaiser FE, Cadeau P, McCready D, Perry III HM 2000 Validation of a screening questionnaire for androgen deficiency in aging males. Metabolism 49:1239–1242[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Summary from the 2nd Annual Andropause Consensus Meeting. The Endocrine Society, 2001. www.endo-society.org/publicpolicy/legislative/upload/andro_cc_summary.pdf (last accessed 12/20/05)
  23. Araujo AB, O’Donnell AB, Brambilla DJ, Simpson WB, Longcope C, Matsumoto AM, McKinlay JB 2004 Prevalence and incidence of androgen deficiency in middle-aged and older men: estimates from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:5920–5926[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. O’Donnell AB, Araujo AB, McKinlay JB 2004 The health of normally aging men: The Massachusetts Male Aging Study (1987–2004). Exp Gerontol 39:975–984[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. McKinlay S, Kipp D, Johnson P, Downey K, Carelton R, A field approach for obtaining physiological measures in surveys of general populations: response rates, reliability and costs. Proc 4th Conference on Health Survey Research Methods, Washington, DC, 1984
  26. McEvoy G 1989 American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Hospital Pharmacists
  27. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ 1998 Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. I. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med 15:539–553[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. 2001 Executive Summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 285:2486–2497
  29. Brambilla DJ, McKinlay SM, McKinlay JB, Weiss SR, Johannes CB, Crawford SL, Longcope C 1996 Does collecting repeated blood samples from each subject improve the precision of estimated steroid hormone levels? J Clin Epidemiol 49:345–350[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Matsumoto AM 2002 Andropause: clinical implications of the decline in serum testosterone levels with aging in men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57:M76–M99
  31. Lunenfeld B, Saad F, Hoesl CE 2005 ISA, ISSAM and EAU recommendations for the investigation, treatment and monitoring of late-onset hypogonadism in males: scientific background and rationale. Aging Male 8:59–74[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Szklo M, Nieto J 2000 Epidemiology: beyond the basics. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen
  33. National Institutes of Health 1998 Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults–the evidence report. Obes Res 6(Suppl 2):51S–209S
  34. Khaw KT, Barrett-Connor E 1992 Lower endogenous androgens predict central adiposity in men. Ann Epidemiol 2:675–682[Medline]
  35. Simon D, Preziosi P, Barrett-Connor E, Roger M, Saint-Paul M, Nahoul K, Papoz L 1992 Interrelation between plasma testosterone and plasma insulin in healthy adult men: the Telecom Study. Diabetologia 35:173–177[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Haffner SM, Karhapaa P, Mykkanen L, Laakso M 1994 Insulin resistance, body fat distribution, and sex hormones in men. Diabetes 43:212–219[Abstract]
  37. Tchernof A, Labrie F, Belanger A, Prud’homme D, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, Despres JP 1997 Relationships between endogenous steroid hormone, sex hormone-binding globulin and lipoprotein levels in men: contribution of visceral obesity, insulin levels and other metabolic variables. Atherosclerosis 133:235–244[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Crave JC, Lejeune H, Brebant C, Baret C, Pugeat M 1995 Differential effects of insulin and insulin-like growth factor I on the production of plasma steroid-binding globulins by human hepatoblastoma-derived (Hep G2) cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:1283–1289[Abstract]
  39. Plymate SR, Matej LA, Jones RE, Friedl KE 1988 Inhibition of sex hormone-binding globulin production in the human hepatoma (Hep G2) cell line by insulin and prolactin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:460–464[Abstract]
  40. Pasquali R, Casimirri F, De Iasio R, Mesini P, Boschi S, Chierici R, Flamia R, Biscotti M, Vicennati V 1995 Insulin regulates testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations in adult normal weight and obese men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:654–658[Abstract]
  41. Katsuki A, Sumida Y, Murashima S, Fujii M, Ito K, Tsuchihashi K, Murata K, Yano Y, Shima T 1996 Acute and chronic regulation of serum sex hormone-binding globulin levels by plasma insulin concentrations in male noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:2515–2519[Abstract]
  42. Lindstedt G, Lundberg PA, Lapidus L, Lundgren H, Bengtsson C, Bjorntorp P 1991 Low sex-hormone-binding globulin concentration as independent risk factor for development of NIDDM. 12-yr follow-up of population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden. Diabetes 40:123–128[Abstract]
  43. Yki-Jarvinen H, Makimattila S, Utriainen T, Rutanen EM 1995 Portal insulin concentrations rather than insulin sensitivity regulate serum sex hormone-binding globulin and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:3227–3232[Abstract]
  44. Birkeland KI, Hanssen KF, Torjesen PA, Vaaler S 1993 Level of sex hormone-binding globulin is positively correlated with insulin sensitivity in men with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:275–278[Abstract]
  45. Matthews JN, Altman DG 1996 Statistics notes. Interaction 2: compare effect sizes not P values. Br Med J 313:808



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Kupelian, F. J. Hayes, C. L. Link, R. Rosen, and J. B. McKinlay
Inverse Association of Testosterone and the Metabolic Syndrome in Men Is Consistent across Race and Ethnic Groups
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 3403 - 3410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S A Paul Chubb, Z. Hyde, O. P Almeida, L. Flicker, P. E Norman, K. Jamrozik, G. J Hankey, and B. B Yeap
Lower sex hormone-binding globulin is more strongly associated with metabolic syndrome than lower total testosterone in older men: the Health in Men Study
Eur. J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 158(6): 785 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
R Olufadi and C D Byrne
Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome
J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2008; 61(6): 697 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
H. E. MacLean, W. S. M. Chiu, C. Ma, J. F. McManus, R. A. Davey, R. Cameron, A. J. Notini, and J. D. Zajac
A floxed allele of the androgen receptor gene causes hyperandrogenization in male mice
Physiol Genomics, March 14, 2008; 33(1): 133 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. H. Emmelot-Vonk, H. J. J. Verhaar, H. R. Nakhai Pour, A. Aleman, T. M. T. W. Lock, J. L. H. R. Bosch, D. E. Grobbee, and Y. T. van der Schouw
Effect of Testosterone Supplementation on Functional Mobility, Cognition, and Other Parameters in Older Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, January 2, 2008; 299(1): 39 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. J. Snyder
Might Testosterone Actually Reduce Mortality?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 32 - 33.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. A. Laughlin, E. Barrett-Connor, and J. Bergstrom
Low Serum Testosterone and Mortality in Older Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 68 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
F. Saad, L. J. Gooren, A. Haider, and A. Yassin
A Dose-Response Study of Testosterone on Sexual Dysfunction and Features of the Metabolic Syndrome Using Testosterone Gel and Parenteral Testosterone Undecanoate
J Androl, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 102 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
Z. T. Bloomgarden
Diabetes and Obesity: Part 1
Diabetes Care, December 1, 2007; 30(12): 3145 - 3151.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Roberge, A. C. Carpentier, M.-F. Langlois, J.-P. Baillargeon, J.-L. Ardilouze, P. Maheux, and N. Gallo-Payet
Adrenocortical dysregulation as a major player in insulin resistance and onset of obesity
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2007; 293(6): E1465 - E1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. B. Araujo, G. R. Esche, V. Kupelian, A. B. O'Donnell, T. G. Travison, R. E. Williams, R. V. Clark, and J. B. McKinlay
Prevalence of Symptomatic Androgen Deficiency in Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4241 - 4247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. A. Yialamas, A. A. Dwyer, E. Hanley, H. Lee, N. Pitteloud, and F. J. Hayes
Acute Sex Steroid Withdrawal Reduces Insulin Sensitivity in Healthy Men with Idiopathic Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4254 - 4259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. W Hsing, L. C Sakoda, and S. C Chua Jr
Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and prostate cancer
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 843S - 857S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Rodriguez, D. C. Muller, E. J. Metter, M. Maggio, S. M. Harman, M. R. Blackman, and R. Andres
Aging, Androgens, and the Metabolic Syndrome in a Longitudinal Study of Aging
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2007; 92(9): 3568 - 3572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. A. Hall, S. T. Page, T. G. Travison, R. B. Montgomery, C. L. Link, and J. B. McKinlay
Do Statins Affect Androgen Levels in Men? Results from the Boston Area Community Health Survey
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2007; 16(8): 1587 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. L. Nielsen, C. Hagen, K. Wraae, K. Brixen, P. H. Petersen, E. Haug, R. Larsen, and M. Andersen
Visceral and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Relation to Circulating Androgens, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, and Luteinizing Hormone in Young Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 2696 - 2705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. B. Araujo, V. Kupelian, S. T. Page, D. J. Handelsman, W. J. Bremner, and J. B. McKinlay
Sex Steroids and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Men
Arch Intern Med, June 25, 2007; 167(12): 1252 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
B. B Yeap, O. P Almeida, Z. Hyde, P. E Norman, S A P. Chubb, K. Jamrozik, and L. Flicker
In men older than 70 years, total testosterone remains stable while free testosterone declines with age. The Health in Men Study
Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 156(5): 585 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. G. Travison, A. B. Araujo, V. Kupelian, A. B. O'Donnell, and J. B. McKinlay
The Relative Contributions of Aging, Health, and Lifestyle Factors to Serum Testosterone Decline in Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 549 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. S. Marks, N. A. Mazer, E. Mostaghel, D. L. Hess, F. J. Dorey, J. I. Epstein, R. W. Veltri, D. V. Makarov, A. W. Partin, D. G. Bostwick, et al.
Effect of Testosterone Replacement Therapy on Prostate Tissue in Men With Late-Onset Hypogonadism: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
JAMA, November 15, 2006; 296(19): 2351 - 2361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Zitzmann, S. Faber, and E. Nieschlag
Association of Specific Symptoms and Metabolic Risks with Serum Testosterone in Older Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2006; 91(11): 4335 - 4343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/3/843    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited