help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2005-1581
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/2/659    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binder, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ranke, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Binder, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ranke, M. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Pediatric Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 2 659-664
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

The d3-Growth Hormone (GH) Receptor Polymorphism Is Associated with Increased Responsiveness to GH in Turner Syndrome and Short Small-for-Gestational-Age Children

G. Binder, F. Baur, R. Schweizer and M. B. Ranke

Section of Pediatric Endocrinology and Growth Research Center, University-Children’s Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: PD Dr. Gerhard Binder, Pediatric Endocrinology Section, University-Children’s Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 1, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. E-mail: gerhard.binder{at}med.uni-tuebingen.de.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: A protein polymorphism of the GH receptor (GHR) based on the genomic deletion of exon 3 (d3-GHR) has recently been linked to the magnitude of growth response to high-dose recombinant human GH (rhGH) therapy of short children without GH deficiency.

Objective: This study tests the novel association in two distinct groups of rhGH-treated patients, short girls with Turner syndrome and short children born small for gestational age (SGA).

Design: The retrospective study included all children who were treated with rhGH during the last 18 yr at our hospital.

Patients: Patients with Turner syndrome were defined by the specific karyotype (n = 53), short children born SGA were determined by birth length and/or weight less than –2.0 SD score and a height at start of rhGH therapy less than –2.0 SD score (n = 60). Exclusion criteria were puberty, an age less than 3.5 or more than 14 yr, and GH deficiency.

Materials and Methods: Growth prediction for the first year of therapy was calculated on the basis of rhGH dose, age, weight, height, and gender-adjusted midparental height according to the prediction models by Ranke et al. The GHR-exon 3 locus was genotyped using a PCR multiplex assay. GH, IGF-I, and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) were measured by RIA.

Intervention: For growth promotion, a mean rhGH dose of 38 µg/kg·d (SD, ±8) was administered in Turner syndrome patients and 56 µg/kg·d (SD, ±11) in short children born SGA.

Results: No significant difference in height, spontaneous height velocity, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 levels was found at the start of rhGH therapy in the three GHR genotype groups studied. At the first year of treatment, girls with Turner syndrome carrying one or two d3-GHR alleles showed a significantly higher increment in height velocity (P = 0.019) and exceeded their growth prediction significantly (P = 0.007), whereas their increments of IGF-I and IGFBP-3, weight, and height were not significantly different. Carriers of d3-GHR in the group of short children born SGA grew significantly faster than predicted (P = 0.023). However, in comparison to the carriers of full-length GHR, gain of height velocity was not significantly higher (P = 0.067). The mean gain of height associated with d3-GHR accounted for approximately 0.75 cm in SGA and 1.5 cm in Turner syndrome during the first year of rhGH therapy.

Conclusions: Our data support the theory that there is increased responsiveness to high-dose rhGH in association with the d3-GHR genotype. The magnitude of this effect may depend on the primary origin of the short stature.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE INCREASE IN height velocity during high-dose recombinant human GH (rhGH) therapy of short children without GH deficiency is variable and not accurately predictable for the individual patient (1). Analyses of large treatment data bases resulted in the identification of prognostic factors like age, weight, and rhGH dose (2, 3). Prediction models based on a weighing up of these factors explain half of the response to GH, suggesting the existence of genetic and environmental determinants independent from the preceding factors (4).

The GH receptor (GHR) is the gateway to the GH signaling cascade. This receptor contains a very unusual genetic polymorphism caused by a genomic deletion of exon 3 (d3-GHR), which mimics alternative splicing, with high frequency (5). This protein polymorphism results in the loss of amino acid (aa) residues 7–28 and the aa substitution A6D at the N-terminal part of the extracellular receptor domain (5), which is conserved in mammalian species (6). The prevalence of the d3-GHR allele in humans is around 25–32% with a homozygosity frequency of 9–14% (5, 7). The aa residues 6–28 of the GHR could not be modeled by any crystallography so far and do not participate in GH binding directly (7). Consequently, binding affinity to GH was not affected by this receptor protein polymorphism in vitro (8, 9). It has been speculated that this supposedly very flexible region may play a role in the conformational changes during transactivation of the GHR dimer by GH (7). However, other effects on gene transcription, RNA splicing, protein stability, and glycosylation as well as transport to the cell membrane are possible as well. The presence of a single copy of the d3-GHR seems to be sufficient for normal human growth (10).

Dos Santos et al. (7) have recently reported an association of the d3-GHR genotype with increased responsiveness to high-dose rhGH therapy in short children without GH deficiency. The children genotyped consisted of short children born small for gestational age (SGA) and those with idiopathic short stature. The responsiveness to GH was measured in increments in height velocity during the first and second year of therapy. Children having one or two d3-GHR alleles showed a 75% higher increment in height velocity in comparison to those with full-length GHR receptors (7). The same research group performed in vitro studies using human embryonic kidney fibroblasts cotransfected with a lactogenic response element containing luciferase as reporter (11) and full-length GHR as well as d3-GHR. The observed luciferase activity stimulated by GH suggested a reduced in vitro bioactivity of the full-length GHR in comparison to the d3-GHR (7).

Because these pharmacogenetic findings on the GH axis have the potential to promote a basis for a rational individualization of rhGH therapy (12), we were interested to test these novel mechanisms in two distinctly defined groups of patients treated with a high-dose GH: a group consisting solely of short children born SGA and a group of short girls with Turner syndrome. Our data confirm the association of the d3-GHR genotype with increased responsiveness to high-dose rhGH therapy.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We analyzed the data of all children who were treated with rhGH during the last 18 yr on the basis of the diagnosis of Turner syndrome or SGA short stature at our Pediatric Endocrinology Department. Turner syndrome was defined by the presence of a karyotype containing a missing or a structurally aberrant X chromosome. A total of 27 girls had 45,X karyotype and three girls had 46,Xi(Xq) karyotype. The remaining 23 individuals had mosaic karyotypes: 45,X/46,Xi(Xq) (n = 9); 45,X/46,XX (n = 6); 45,X/46,XdelXq (n = 4); 45,X/46,XdelXp (n = 1); 45,X/46,XrX (n = 1); 45,X/47,XXX (n = 1); 45,X/46,Xder(Y) (n = 1).

The clinical characteristics of Turner girls at the start of therapy are summarized in the first column of Table 1Go. SGA short stature was defined by birth length and/or weight of two or more SD below the mean according to Niklasson et al. (13) and a height at start of therapy below –2.0 SD score (SDS) according to Prader et al. (14). Mean birth length was –2.96 SDS (±1.27) and mean birth weight was –2.91 SDS (±1.25). The first column of Table 2Go shows the clinical characteristics of the group of SGA children treated.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Clinical characteristics of the girls with Turner syndrome—in total and grouped by GHR genotype—at start of therapy given as mean (SD)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Clinical characteristics of the short SGA children—in total and grouped by GHR genotype—at start of therapy given as mean (SD)

 
Exclusion criteria of the study were puberty at start or during the first year of treatment (indicated by thelarche in females and testicular volume more than 3 ml in boys), an age less than 3.5 or above 14 yr, oxandrolone therapy, and GH peak serum levels less than 8 ng/ml in two independent tests. The vast majority of children studied were Germans, three were of Turkish, two of Greek, and one of Italian origin.

The clinical data were collected from the patients’ records by F.B., who was blinded to the results of the genetic analysis. The spontaneous growth immediately before therapy was documented for at least 9 months in each child. The parents’ heights were measured in all but three patients, who were adopted. Height, weight, and gender-adjusted midparental height (MPH) were transformed in SDS according to Prader et al. (14); height velocities are given in SDS according to Tanner et al. (15, 16). For weight, the reference values reported by Freeman et al. (17) were used. Height gain ({Delta} height = height at start minus height after 12 months of therapy), increment in height velocity ({Delta} height velocity = height velocity at start minus height velocity during the first 12 months of therapy), and weight gain ({Delta} weight) were calculated. rhGH therapy was performed using a mean dose of 38 µg/kg·d (±8) in Turner syndrome and of 56 µg/kg·d (±11) in short children born SGA. There was no significant difference in the GH dose between subgroups according to the genotype (Tables 3Go and 4Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. First year response of the Turner syndrome girls to rhGH therapy in total and grouped by GHR genotype given as mean (SD)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. First year response of the short SGA children to rhGH therapy in total and grouped by GHR genotype given as mean (SD)

 
Written informed consent for this study was obtained from all parents and caregivers. The study has been approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Faculty Tübingen.

Growth prediction

For each child, a growth prediction for the first year of therapy was calculated according to Ranke et al. (2, 3). Their prediction model incorporates rhGH dose, age, and weight at start of therapy [given in SDS according to Freeman et al. (17)] as well as gender-adjusted MPH (in SGA) or the distance to MPH [given in height SDS according to Tanner et al. (15, 16)] as the main prognostic factors.

The equation for prediction in Turner syndrome is: centimeters of growth during the first year = 8.1 + [2.2 x rhGH dose (ln; IU/kg·wk)] + [–0.3 x age at onset (yr)] + [0.4 x body weight SDS] + [–0.2 x (height SDS – MPH SDS)] + [0.4 x number of injections per week] + [1.6 x (oxandrolone = 1; no oxandrolone = 0)].

The equation for prediction in short SGA children is: centimeters of growth during the first year = 9.4 + [56.51 x rhGH dose (mg/kg·d)] + [–0.31 x age at onset (yr)] + [0.30 x body weight SDS at start] + [0.11 x MPH SDS].

The individual deviations from the prediction were divided by the SE of the prediction, which is 1.26 cm in Turner syndrome and 1.30 cm in SGA children (2, 3), resulting in the Studentized residuals. A Studentized residual of 0 means that the prediction was completely fulfilled; positive values indicate growth exceeding the prediction, negative values are the expression of growth slower than predicted.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood lymphocytes using NucleoSpin Blood XL (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). For genotyping of the GHR-exon 3 locus, the PCR multiplex assay invented by Pantel et al. (5) was used. Products were analyzed on a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Sixty-two control individuals were genotyped as well.

Hormone measurements

hGH levels in serum were measured by a polyclonal in-house RIA and were calibrated against the World Health Organization International Reference Preparation 88/624 (1 mg = 3 IU). The lower detection limit was 0.1 µg/liter. The mean intraassay coefficient of variation was 6.9%, the mean interassay coefficient was 9.5% (18). Serum levels of IGF-I and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) were both measured by RIA as described by Blum et al. (19, 20). The mean intra and interassay coefficients of the IGF-I assay were less than 10%. For the IGFBP-3 assay, the intraassay coefficient of variation was 4.1%, the interassay coefficient of variation was 9.7%. The age and gender-dependent IGF-I and IGFBP-3 serum levels were expressed in SDS. The {Delta} of the serum levels after 12 months of therapy and those at start were calculated.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the two-tailed Student’s t test for the continuous characteristics. P values <0.05 were considered to indicate significance.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Distribution of d3-GHR and full-length GHR

The multiplex assay of the GHR exon 3 locus yielded the expected fragments of 935 bp (indicating the presence of full-length GHR) and 532 bp (d3-GHR), which accurately discriminated between the three possible genotypes fl/fl, d3/fl, and d3/d3. The distribution of the genotypes in the 175 children tested was not significantly different between controls, short children born SGA, and Turner syndrome girls (Table 5Go). The calculated allele frequencies for full-length GHR and d3-GHR were 66 and 34%, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Distribution of genotypes at the human GHR-exon 3 locus given as percentage

 
GHR exon 3 genotypes and clinical characteristics

Tables 1Go and 2Go show the means and SDs of the growth parameters at start of rhGH therapy. There was no significant difference in height and spontaneous height velocity between the three different genotype groups, within Turner girls, and short children born SGA. The same was true for the IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels. In the Turner girls, the gender-adjusted MPH of the d3/d3 group (mean, –0.16) was significantly lower than of the fl/fl group (mean, +0.72) (P = 0.037).

GHR exon 3 genotypes and response to rhGH in Turner syndrome

Table 3Go and Figs. 1Go and 2Go show the clinical and biochemical changes under rhGH therapy in girls with Turner syndrome. The increment in height velocity was significantly higher in the d3/d3 group in comparison to the other two groups tested (P = 0.0031; d3/d3 vs. fl/fl; P = 0.048; d3/d3 vs. d3/fl). This difference in height gain was also significant when d3/d3 and d3/fl girls with Turner syndrome were pooled and compared with the fl/fl group (P = 0.019) (Fig. 1Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Effect of high-dose rhGH during the first year of treatment on the acceleration of growth given as increment in height velocity. Patients are grouped into the three genotypes of the GHR exon 3 locus polymorphism. Each circle represents one patient. Significantly more increment in height velocity was found in girls with Turner syndrome (left panel) who carried the d3-GHR allele, whereas a similar trend in short children born SGA (right panel) did not reach statistical significance.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Individual deviations from the growth prediction for the first year of high-dose rhGH therapy according to the model of Ranke et al. (2 3 ), incorporating rhGH dose, age, and weight at start of therapy as well as gender-adjusted MPH (for SGA) or the distance to MPH (for Turner syndrome). Positive Studentized residuals indicate growth that exceeded the prediction, negative values indicate growth below the prediction. A Studentized residual of +1.0 is equivalent to 1.26 cm more growth in Turner syndrome and 1.30 cm in short SGA children than predicted. Each circle represents one child. In three cases, prediction was not possible because MPH was unknown. In both Turner syndrome and SGA, height velocity of carriers of the d3-GHR allele exceeded the prognosis.

 
In addition, the Studentized residuals calculated in the aforementioned prediction model (2) were significantly higher in the d3/d3 group (+0.75) than in the fl/fl group (–0.42) (P = 0.0012) and exceeded the prognosis in seven of 11 girls by more than 0.5. This difference was less, but also significantly different when all children with the d3-GHR allele (d3/d3 and d3/fl) (+0.36) were compared with the fl/fl children (–0.42) (P = 0.007) (Fig. 2Go). Consequently, the majority of the girls with Turner syndrome carrying the fl/fl genotype did not meet their prediction (Fig. 2Go). The higher mean MPH of this group in comparison to the d3/fl group and the d3/d3 group contributed to this fact.

The increments of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels as well as the weight and height gain during therapy expressed in SDS were not significantly different between the three genotype groups.

GHR exon 3 genotypes and response to rhGH in short SGA children

The same parameters of the SGA children grouped into the three different genotypes of the GHR are shown in Table 4Go and Figs. 1Go and 2Go. The effects associated with the d3-GHR allele that were observed were milder in this group of patients; mean height velocity was modestly higher in the d3/fl and d3/d3 genotyped groups, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.067) (Fig. 1Go). The combined group of d3/d3 and d3/fl children showed significantly higher Studentized residuals (+0.27) than the fl/fl children (–0.36) (P = 0.023), the same was true for the d3/fl children in comparison to the fl/fl children (P = 0.047) (Fig. 2Go). No level of significance was reached for the small group of d3/d3 children (n = 8) in comparison to the fl/fl children. As in Turner syndrome, the increase of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in serum or changes in weight and height during therapy were not significantly different between the three genotype groups.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effective growth promotion with high-dose GH in short children without GH deficiency is influenced by the GH sensitivity, which depends on multiple gene loci involved in the functioning of the GH-IGF-I-signaling cascade as well as on the response of the epiphyseal growth plate (21, 22). Pharmacogenetics of GH should enable us to relate the polymorphic sites of these gene loci to the individual growth response. Moreover, it should improve the prediction of the profit of therapy under ideal circumstances (12). The pharmacogenetic data presented here point to the importance of the GHR genotype for GH responsiveness although the magnitude of this effect was group specific.

The girls with Turner syndrome are a specific female subgroup of short children with a basically skeletal short stature in combination with hypogonadism (23). The girls with Turner syndrome of our study who were homozygote for the d3-GHR variant showed the highest increment in height velocity and exceeded their growth prediction by far. This prediction was based on rhGH dose, age, height, weight, and gender-adjusted MPH (2), factors that showed no correlation to the GHR genotype studied. Accordingly, the majority of Turner girls with the full-length GHR failed to reach their height prediction and the heterozygotes (d3/fl) showed intermediate responsiveness to GH. These data collected in a group of 53 Turner girls may suggest that the responsiveness to GH is correlated to the gene dosage of the d3-GHR allele resembling the in vitro findings in human embryonic kidney fibroblasts where transactivation of the lactogenic response element was correlated to the amount of d3-GHR transfected (7). The overall effect associated with d3-GHR observed seems to account for 1.5 cm of height gain during the first year of rhGH therapy.

The second group tested, the short children born SGA, demonstrated only a mildly increased response to high-dose rhGH in the presence of the d3-GHR variant when estimated by the prediction model. The Studentized residuals indicated a significantly higher responsiveness in carriers of one or two d3-GHR alleles, but the difference was smaller, around half of that observed in Turner syndrome. Consequently, the mean height velocity increment of the carriers of d3-GHR was not found to be significantly higher than in children of the fl/fl group.

In contrast to girls with Turner syndrome, short children born SGA are a quite heterogeneous group regarding the origin of short stature (24, 25). Height gain during high-dose rhGH therapy associated with the presence of the d3-GHR allele may depend on the specific mechanisms that are involved in short stature. This gain in height may be small or absent in primary IGF-I deficiency, but substantial in IGF-I insensitivity like in defects at the epiphyseal growth plate. Interestingly, the significant differences of height increment associated with the GHR genotypes were not reflected by different increases in IGF-I levels in this study. Therefore, one may speculate that IGF-I-independent effects of high-dose rhGH at the epiphyseal growth plate could also play a role (26). Alternatively, IGF-I serum levels may not display the total IGF-I mediated effect at the epiphyseal growth plate, as autocrine and paracrine effects of locally secreted IGF-I—which are also influenced by GH therapy—may not be reflected by the circulating IGF-I concentration (26).

The short children genotyped at the GHR locus by Dos Santos et al. (7) were treated with a similar rhGH dose (in cohort 1) as our SGA group, but were, in the mean, 6 months younger and almost 1 SD taller. Most importantly, only 37% of these short children were born SGA, the majority having idiopathic short stature. Their observed increment in height velocity of 3.64 cm/yr during the first year reported for the fl/fl children of the mixed cohort 1 is almost identical to our findings for the total group independent of the GHR genotype (3.84 cm/yr). In contrast, increments in height velocity of 6.30 cm/yr or higher that were reported as mean increments in the d3/fl and d3/d3 groups by Dos Santos et al. (7) could not be confirmed by us. The difference in height velocity found here is likely to account for less than 1 cm in the first year of therapy, which is significantly less than 2 or 3 cm/yr as suggested previously (7).

It has been shown that association studies like this can be biased by the accidental collection of a subgroup of individuals that ultimately causes spurious results, the so called population stratification (27). We cannot completely exclude effects of population stratification, which may mask effects of the d3-GHR variant in our relatively small group studied. However, our group was quite homogeneous, which substantially decrease the chance that a relevant population substructure might have been present. The mechanism at the cellular level that contributes to the higher GH sensitivity associated with the d3-GHR allele may involve altered transactivation, production, stability, glycosylation, or transport of GHR. Uncovering this mechanism will promote our understanding of the GH-IGF-axis. In addition, prospective studies are needed for corroboration of the retrospective data presented in this study.

This study indicates that genotyping of the d3-GHR protein polymorphism may provide a tool for a more precise understanding of rhGH effects on growth and for the individualization of rhGH dosing in growth promoting therapy when GH deficiency is absent.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank C. Urban for excellent technical assistance and C. P. Schwarze and E. Erdmann-Schwarze for language editing.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported in part by the Pfizer Company (Growth Research Center Tübingen).

First Published Online November 15, 2005

Abbreviations: aa, Amino acid; GHR, GH receptor; IGFBP-3, IGF binding protein 3; MPH, midparental height; rhGH, recombinant human GH; SDS, SD score; SGA, small for gestational age.

Received July 15, 2005.

Accepted November 9, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bryant J, Cave C, Milne R 2003 Recombinant growth hormone for idiopathic short stature in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004440
  2. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Chatelain P, Wilton P, Cutfield W, Albertsson-Wikland K, Price DA; KIGS International Board. 2000 Prediction of long-term response to recombinant human growth hormone in Turner syndrome: development and validation of mathematical models. Kabi International Growth Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4212–4218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Cowell CT, Wikland KA, Reiter EO, Wilton P, Price DA; KIGS International Board 2003 Prediction of response to growth hormone treatment in short children born small for gestational age: analysis of data from KIGS (Pharmacia International Growth Database). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:125–131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Rosenbloom AL 1999 A mathematical model for predicting growth response to growth hormone replacement therapy—a useful clinical tool or an intellectual exercise? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1172–1173[Free Full Text]
  5. Pantel J, Machinis K, Sobrier ML, Duquesnoy P, Goossens M, Amselem S 2000 Species-specific alternative splice mimicry at the growth hormone receptor locus revealed by the lineage of retroelements during primate evolution. J Biol Chem 275:18664–18669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kelly PA, Ali S, Rozakis M, Goujon L, Nagano M, Pellegrini I, Gould D, Djiane J, Edery M, Finidori J, Postel Vinay MC 1993 The growth hormone/prolactin receptor family. Recent Prog Horm Res 48:123–164
  7. Dos Santos C, Essioux L, Teinturier C, Tauber M, Goffin V, Bougneres P 2004 A common polymorphism of the growth hormone receptor is associated with increased responsiveness to growth hormone. Nat Genet 36:720–724[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Urbanek M, Russell JE, Cooke NE, Liebhaber SA 1993 Functional characterization of the alternatively spliced, placental human growth hormone receptor. J Biol Chem 268:19025–19032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Sobrier ML, Duquesnoy P, Duriez B, Amselem S, Goossens M 1993 Expression and binding properties of two isoforms of the human growth hormone receptor. FEBS Lett 319:16–20[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Pantel J, Grulich-Henn J, Bettendorf M, Strasburger CJ, Heinrich U, Amselem S 2003 Heterozygous nonsense mutation in exon 3 of the growth hormone receptor (GHR) in severe GH insensitivity (Laron syndrome) and the issue of the origin and function of the GHRd3 isoform. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1705–1710[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Goffin V, Kinet S, Ferrag F, Binart N, Martial JA, Kelly PA 1996 Antagonistic properties of human prolactin analogs that show paradoxical agonistic activity in the Nb2 bioassay. J Biol Chem 271:16573–16579[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Thomas FJ, McLeod HL, Watters JW 2004 Pharmacogenomics: the influence of genomic variation on drug response. Curr Top Med Chem 4:1399–1409[Medline]
  13. Niklasson A, Ericson A, Fryer JG, Karlberg J, Lawrence C, Karlberg P 1991 An update of the Swedish reference standards for weight, length and head circumference at birth for given gestational age (1977–1981). Acta Paediatr Scand 80:756–762[Medline]
  14. Prader A, Largo RH, Molinari L, Issler C 1989 Physical growth of Swiss children from birth to 20 years of age. First Zurich longitudinal study of growth and development. Helv Paediatr Acta Suppl 52:1–125[Medline]
  15. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Takaishi M 1966 Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. II. Arch Dis Child 41:613–635
  16. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Takaishi M 1966 Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. I. Arch Dis Child 41:454–471
  17. Freeman JV, Cole TJ, Chinn S, Jones PR, White EM, Preece MA 1995 Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990. Arch Dis Child 73:17–24[Abstract]
  18. Hauffa BP, Lehmann N, Bettendorf M, Mehls O, Dorr HG, Partsch CJ, Schwarz HP, Stahnke N, Steinkamp H, Said E, Sander S, Ranke MB; KIGS/IGLU Study Group 2004 Central reassessment of GH concentrations measured at local treatment centers in children with impaired growth: consequences for patient management. Eur J Endocrinol 150:291–297[Abstract]
  19. Blum WF, Albertsson-Wikland K, Rosberg S, Ranke MB 1993 Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein 3 reflect spontaneous growth hormone secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:1610–1616[Abstract]
  20. Blum WF, Schweizer R 2003 Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins. In: Ranke MB, ed. Diagnostics of endocrine function in children and adolescents. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 166–199
  21. Rosenfeld RG, Hwa V 2004 New molecular mechanisms of GH resistance. Eur J Endocrinol 151(Suppl 1):S11–S15
  22. Binder G, Neuer K, Ranke MB, Wittekindt N 2005 PTPN11 mutations are associated with mild growth hormone resistance in individuals with Noonan syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:5377–5381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ranke MB, Saenger P 2001 Turner’s syndrome. Lancet 358:309–314[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Johnston LB, Savage MO 2004 Should recombinant human growth hormone therapy be used in short small for gestational age children. Arch Dis Child 89:740–744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Abuzzahab MJ, Schneider A, Goddard A, Grigorescu F, Lautier C, Keller E, Kiess W, Klammt J, Kratzsch J, Osgood D, Pfaffle R, Raile K, Seidel B, Smith RJ, Chernausek SD; Intrauterine Growth Retardation (IUGR) Study Group 2003 IGF-I receptor mutations resulting in intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation. N Engl J Med 349:2211–2222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. van der Eerden BC, Karperien M, Wit JM 2003 Systemic and local regulation of the growth plate. Endocr Rev 24:782–801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Cardon LR, Palmer LJ 2003 Population stratification and spurious allelic association. Lancet 361:598–604[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
G. Kenth, J. A M. Mergelas, and C. G. Goodyer
Developmental changes in the human GH receptor and its signal transduction pathways
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 198(1): 71 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. A. van der Klaauw, T. van der Straaten, R. Baak-Pablo, N. R. Biermasz, H.-J. Guchelaar, A. M. Pereira, J. W. A. Smit, and J. A. Romijn
Influence of the d3-Growth Hormone (GH) Receptor Isoform on Short-Term and Long-Term Treatment Response to GH Replacement in GH-Deficient Adults
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2828 - 2834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Audi, A. Carrascosa, C. Esteban, M. Fernandez-Cancio, P. Andaluz, D. Yeste, R. Espadero, M. L. Granada, H. Wollmann, L. Fryklund, et al.
The exon 3-deleted/full-length Growth Hormone Receptor Polymorphism Does Not Influence the Effect of Puberty or Growth Hormone Therapy on Glucose Homeostasis in Short Non-Growth Hormone-Deficient Small-for-Gestational-Age Children: Results from a Two-Year Controlled Prospective Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2709 - 2715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. Raz, M. Janner, V. Petkovic, D. Lochmatter, A. Eble, M. T. Dattani, P. C. Hindmarsh, C. E. Fluck, and P. E. Mullis
Influence of Growth Hormone (GH) Receptor Deletion of Exon 3 and Full-Length Isoforms on GH Response and Final Height in Patients with Severe GH Deficiency
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 974 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Schreiner, S. Stutte, P. Bartmann, B. Gohlke, and J. Woelfle
Association of the Growth Hormone Receptor d3-Variant and Catch-up Growth of Preterm Infants with Birth Weight of Less Than 1500 Grams
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4489 - 4493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. L. Davenport, B. J. Crowe, S. H. Travers, K. Rubin, J. L. Ross, P. Y. Fechner, D. F. Gunther, C. Liu, M. E. Geffner, K. Thrailkill, et al.
Growth Hormone Treatment of Early Growth Failure in Toddlers with Turner Syndrome: A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Trial
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2007; 92(9): 3406 - 3416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
R. G Rosenfeld
Pharmacogenomics and pharmacoproteomics in the evaluation and management of short stature
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2007; 157(suppl_1): S27 - S31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. Schmid, P.-A. Krayenbuehl, R.-L. Bernays, C. Zwimpfer, F. E. Maly, and P. Wiesli
Growth Hormone (GH) Receptor Isoform in Acromegaly: Lower Concentrations of GH but Not Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 in Patients with a Genomic Deletion of Exon 3 in the GH Receptor Gene
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2007; 53(8): 1484 - 1488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. B. Jensen, S. Vielwerth, T. Larsen, G. Greisen, H. Leffers, and A. Juul
The Presence of the d3-Growth Hormone Receptor Polymorphism Is Negatively Associated with Fetal Growth but Positively Associated with Postnatal Growth in Healthy Subjects
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 2758 - 2763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
P. Saenger, P. Czernichow, I. Hughes, and E. O. Reiter
Small for Gestational Age: Short Stature and Beyond
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2007; 28(2): 219 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Kenth, Z. Shao, D. E. C. Cole, and C. G. Goodyer
Relationship of the Human Growth Hormone Receptor Exon 3 Genotype with Final Adult Height and Bone Mineral Density
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 725 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Audi, C. Esteban, A. Carrascosa, R. Espadero, A. Perez-Arroyo, R. Arjona, M. Clemente, H. Wollmann, L. Fryklund, L. A. Parodi, et al.
Exon 3-Deleted/Full-Length Growth Hormone Receptor Polymorphism Genotype Frequencies in Spanish Short Small-for-Gestational-Age (SGA) Children and Adolescents (n = 247) and in an Adult Control Population (n = 289) Show Increased fl/fl in Short SGA
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 5038 - 5043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
R. Pfaffle
Genetics of growth in the normal child
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 155(suppl_1): S27 - S33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
W. F. Blum, K. Machinis, E. P. Shavrikova, A. Keller, H. Stobbe, R. W. Pfaeffle, and S. Amselem
The Growth Response to Growth Hormone (GH) Treatment in Children with Isolated GH Deficiency Is Independent of the Presence of the Exon 3-Minus Isoform of the GH Receptor
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 4171 - 4174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Carrascosa, C. Esteban, R. Espadero, M. Fernandez-Cancio, P. Andaluz, M. Clemente, L. Audi, H. Wollmann, L. Fryklund, L. Parodi, et al.
The d3/fl-Growth Hormone (GH) Receptor Polymorphism Does Not Influence the Effect of GH Treatment (66 {micro}g/kg per Day) or the Spontaneous Growth in Short Non-GH-Deficient Small-for-Gestational-Age Children: Results from a Two-Year Controlled Prospective Study in 170 Spanish Patients
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2006; 91(9): 3281 - 3286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. B. Allen
Growth Hormone Therapy for Short Stature: Is the Benefit Worth the Burden?
Pediatrics, July 1, 2006; 118(1): 343 - 348.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/2/659    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binder, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ranke, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Binder, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ranke, M. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Pediatric Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals