help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0686
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weetman, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weetman, A. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Thyroid
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 2 646-653
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

A Genome-Wide Screen in 1119 Relative Pairs with Autoimmune Thyroid Disease

J. C. Taylor, S. C. Gough, P. J. Hunt, T. H. Brix, K. Chatterjee, J. M. Connell, J. A. Franklyn, L. Hegedus, B. G. Robinson, W. M. Wiersinga, J. A. H. Wass, D. Zabaneh, I. Mackay and A. P. Weetman

Oxagen Ltd. (J.C.T., D.Z., I.M.), Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RY, United Kingdom; Oxford Genetics Knowledge Park, Wellcome Trust Center for Human Genetics (J.C.T.), Headington, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Sciences, University of Birmingham (S.C.G., J.A.F.), Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Department of Endocrinology, Christchurch Hospital (P.J.H.), Christchurch 8001, New Zealand; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Odense University Hospital (T.H.B., L.H.), DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke’s Hospital (K.C.), Cambridge CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom; University Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Western Infirmary (J.M.C.), Glasgow, Scotland G11 6NT, United Kingdom; Kolling Institute and Department of Endocrinology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney (B.G.R.), Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Academisch Medisch Centrum, University of Amsterdam (W.M.W.), 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital (J.A.H.W.), Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom; and University of Sheffield Clinical Sciences Center, Northern General Hospital (A.P.W.), Sheffield S5 7AU, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. J. C. Taylor, Oxford Genetics Knowledge Park, Wellcome Trust Center for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom. E-mail: jenny.taylor{at}well.ox.ac.uk.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD), comprising Graves’ disease and autoimmune hypothyroidism, are characterized by loss of immunological self-tolerance to thyroid antigens. These are complex diseases arising from a combination of genetic and environmental factors. An understanding of the genetic susceptibility factors for AITD could help to target treatments more effectively and identify people at risk for these conditions.

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify regions of genetic linkage to AITD that could potentially harbor genetic susceptibility factors for these conditions.

Design: The study design was a genome-wide screen performed on affected relative pairs with AITD.

Setting: Patients were recruited through hospital endocrinology clinics.

Participants: Some 1119 Caucasian relative pairs affected with AITD (Graves’ disease or autoimmune hypothyroidism) were recruited into the study.

Intervention: Blood samples were obtained from each participant for DNA analysis, and clinical questionnaires were completed.

Main Outcome Measure: The study aimed to identify regions of genetic linkage to AITD.

Results: Three regions of suggestive linkage were obtained on chromosomes 18p11 (maximum LOD score, 2.5), 2q36 (maximum LOD score, 2.2), and 11p15 (maximum LOD score, 2.0). No linkage to human leukocyte antigen was found.

Conclusions: The absence of significant evidence of linkage at any one locus in such a large dataset argues that genetic susceptibility to AITD reflects a number of loci, each with a modest effect. Linkage analysis may be limited in defining such loci, and large-scale association studies may prove to be more useful in identifying genetic susceptibility factors for AITD.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES ARE a group of disorders characterized by loss of immunological self-tolerance. Historically, autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) has provided a model for other autoimmune diseases. Its prevalence in the population and the availability of animal models make it a good example of the subset of autoimmune diseases that are mediated by both humoral and cellular mechanisms. AITD comprises two clinical phenotypes, Graves’ disease (GD; MIM 275000) and autoimmune hypothyroidism (AIH). AIH, in turn, comprises goitrous [Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT); MIM 140300] and nongoitrous forms. Together, these disorders affect 1–2% of the population, with a 5- to 10-fold excess in women. GD and AIH have many immunological features in common, including the presence of a thyroid lymphocytic infiltrate and autoantibodies to thyroglobulin (TG) and thyroid peroxidase (TPO) (1, 2). Individuals with normal thyroid function, but serum thyroid autoantibodies, may be at increased risk of progression to overt thyroid disease. Additional illustration of the close association between these two disorders is provided by the transition from one to the other seen in occasional patients and the frequent occurrence of both GD and AIH in different members of the same family. These observations suggest that GD and AIH share genetic and/or environmental factors (3, 4, 5).

The importance of genetic factors in determining susceptibility to AITD has been demonstrated by animal models of AITD (6), the increased risk of thyroid disease in siblings of affected individuals (7), and the higher concordance rate in monozygotic compared with dizygotic twins (8, 9). The most recent modeling analysis of twin data suggests that up to 79% of the liability to the development of GD is attributable to genetic factors (10). The remainder is presumed to arise from environmental determinants. Concordance rates for AIH have also been estimated to be significantly higher in monozygotic compared with dizygotic twins, suggesting that genetic factors also contribute to the development of AIH (11).

Identification of the susceptibility genes in AITD has, in general, relied upon the investigation of candidate genes in population-based association studies or linkage analysis in families. Such studies have collectively provided overwhelming evidence that loci in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region (chromosome 6p21) are important (8, 12, 13), providing relative risks of 1.9–4.0 for GD and 1.9 for AIH (13, 14). Polymorphisms in the region of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) gene on chromosome 2q33 have also been associated with GD and AIH, and linkage confirmed in family studies (15, 16, 17). Primary susceptibility has now been mapped to CTLA-4 itself with an odds ratio of 1.5 [confidence interval (CI), 1.31–1.75; P = 2.72 x 10–8] for GD and 1.45 [95% CI, 1.17–1.80; P = 0.0005] for AIH (17). Most recently, the gene encoding lymphoid protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTPN22) has been identified as a general susceptibility locus for a number of autoimmune diseases, including GD (18, 19), for which an odds ratio of 1.43 [95% CI, 1.17–1.76; P = 6.24 x 10–4] has been previously reported (18). These studies suggest that the HLA region and CTLA-4 and LYP genes make only a modest contribution to the susceptibility to AITD; therefore, other loci remain to be identified.

Genome scans have been used to provide hypothesis-free information about genetic susceptibility in a number of complex diseases, including autoimmune diseases. Several genome scans, each of modest size, have been reported for AITD; however, the putative loci have not generally been replicated (20, 21, 22, 23). In an attempt to address this lack of consistency, which may relate to the size and genetic heterogeneity of the sample sets, we have conducted a genome scan on 1119 Caucasian relative pairs affected with AITD.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Family collection

Families were recruited through the eight participating centers in the United Kingdom, continental Europe, and Australasia. The study received ethical approval from each institution’s local review ethics committee and additionally from the regional multicenter ethics committees where appropriate. Written informed consent was obtained from every participant. Individuals affected with either GD or AIH were accepted into the study. To minimize genetic heterogeneity, only subjects with at least a three-generation history of white Caucasian origin were recruited. Families were recruited if they had either a sibling pair or at least two affected members (including avuncular and grandparent/grandchild pairs, but excluding parent/offspring relationships) affected with AITD. Unaffected individuals, including parents, were recruited where possible to maximize the genetic information obtainable.

GD was defined by the presence of documented biochemical hyperthyroidism in combination with 1) a diffuse goiter on a scan, 2) positive autoantibodies to TSH receptor (TSHR), TG, or TPO, 3) Graves’ ophthalmopathy, or 4) confirmation of a lymphocytic infiltrate in thyroid histology. The diagnostic criteria for AIH were defined as documented biochemical hypothyroidism and 1) positive autoantibodies to TG or TPO, 2) histological confirmation of a lymphocytic infiltrate in a fine needle aspirate, or 3) presence of a goiter on clinical examination.

Serum TSH concentration and thyroid antibody (TG and TPO) status were tested for all participants at the time of entry into the study. This permitted confirmation of the autoimmune nature of the thyroid disease in a considerable number of participants whose autoantibody levels had not been measured in the course of their treatment. Any subjects recruited as apparently unaffected with AITD, but found subsequently to have positive autoantibodies and a suppressed serum TSH concentration (with raised thyroid hormone levels) or an elevated TSH level, were reclassified as being affected with either GD or AIH, respectively, and the individuals were notified accordingly.

Family studies have repeatedly demonstrated a higher prevalence of thyroid autoantibodies among first degree relatives of patients with AITD than in the general population alone (24). The presence of thyroid autoantibodies may be associated with an increased risk of developing AITD (25), suggesting that the development of autoantibodies might be an early event in the pathogenesis of AITD. To evaluate whether distinct genetic loci influence the development of autoantibodies, an additional autoantibody (AB) phenotypic trait was defined as the subset of individuals positive for TG, TPO, or TSHR autoantibodies. This cohort included both GD and AIH patients who had positive autoantibodies either at the time of diagnosis or at follow-up and, in addition, any biochemically euthyroid patients with positive autoantibodies.

Laboratory methods

Blood samples were collected from all participants for DNA and serum. DNA was isolated using a Puregene kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Serum samples from all individuals were tested for the presence of TPO autoantibodies by ELISA (26), and positivity was defined as values more than 3 SD above the mean from a sample of 150 healthy blood donors. The serum TSH concentration was measured using the Bayer Diagnostics ACS 180 immunoassay analyzer (Newbury, UK).

A genome-wide screen was carried out using 389 markers spaced at 10-cM intervals from the LMS2 marker set (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Additional markers were included to replace those excluded by error-checking procedures. The markers were amplified using standard ABI protocols, pooled in sets of 15–20 markers, and products were separated by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels using the ABI 3700 automated sequencers. Products were sized using the GENESCAN program (Applied Biosystems), and genotypes were assigned semiautomatically using GENOTYPER.

Statistical analysis

Our power calculations used a {lambda}s = 5 based on the most conservative estimate of this parameter (reviewed in Ref.8) and assumed that five genes accounted for the genetic effects. This would give 99% power to detect any one locus and 87% power to detect any specific locus, with a locus-specific {lambda}s of 1.37 in a dataset of this size.

To minimize genotyping errors, extensive checking procedures were employed. The genetic relationships between family members were verified using a proprietary version of the software GRR (27). This program identified 13 pairs of monozygotic twins who were subsequently removed from the dataset and a number of half-sibling pairs who were originally considered to be full siblings. PedCheck (28) and Merlin (29) were used to screen for parent-child allele incompatibilities and possible genotyping errors. Tests for marker heterozygosity and double recombination were also carried out.

For the GD analysis, only family members with GD were defined as affected. Similarly, the AIH analysis used relative pairs that were purely AIH and not mixed with GD. The AITD-affected status was derived from those families with members affected with GD, AIH, or both. The AB subgroup included any individuals who had at any time tested positive for autoantibodies to TPO, TG, or TSHR regardless of their clinical status.

Merlin was used for multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis of the affected relative pairs. Affected relative pair analysis has been reported to be more powerful than affected sibling pair analysis and was therefore the method of choice for this study (30). Simulation studies were conducted in Merlin to assess the genome-wide significance of the findings. One thousand simulations were run using a dataset that comprised the majority of families used in the experimental genome scan. The simulations were therefore based on the same ascertainment criteria and mode of statistical analysis as the genome scan reported in this study.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
AITD families

A total of 558 families containing 1119 relative pairs affected with AITD were collected for this study. Affected relative pairs included full siblings, half siblings, grandparent/grandchild pairs, and avuncular pairs, but excluded parent-offspring relationships. Of the 558 AITD families, 238 contained only individuals with GD, 206 were purely AIH, and the remaining 114 were mixed GD and AIH. The AB cohort numbered 349 families. A breakdown of the cohort composition by phenotype is shown in Table 1Go. DNA from parents was collected wherever possible to ensure that a family was genetically informative using identity by descent analysis. Where parents were not available, unaffected siblings were collected.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Traits and counts of affected pairs

 
Genome-wide screen

The results of the nonparametric multipoint analysis of affected relative pairs for each trait are summarized in Fig. 1Go. Empirical threshold LOD values for suggestive and significant linkages were defined from simulation studies. Genotypes for the four traits (GD, AIH, AITD, and AB) were each simulated 1000 times for the majority of the families in the cohort. The mean LOD score from these simulations was used to derive a threshold value of suggestive linkage for each trait. Suggestive linkages were 1.79 for GD, 1.80 for AIH, 1.74 for AB, and 1.74 for AITD. LOD scores for linkages significant at the 5%, 1%, and 0.1% levels were also obtained. The number of linkages that would be expected purely by chance was also simulated and found to be one locus for each trait investigated (GD, AIH, AB, or AITD). The simulation data are summarized in Table 2Go.


Figure 1
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. A, Genome-wide scan for multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis of 302 relative pairs with GD, showing all chromosomes. B, Genome-wide scan for multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis of 470 relative pairs with AIH, showing all chromosomes. C, Genome-wide scan for multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis of 1119 relative pairs with AITD, showing all chromosomes. D, Genome-wide scan for multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis of 868 relative pairs with positive thyroid autoantibodies, showing all chromosomes.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Summary of results and significance levels from 1000 simulated genome scans

 
Chromosomal regions showing evidence suggestive of linkage are highlighted in Table 3Go, and LOD plots for these chromosomes are shown in Fig. 2Go. For the GD subset of families, three regions showed evidence suggestive of linkage (LOD, >1.79) when the threshold defined by the simulation data were applied. The highest maximum LOD score (MLS) obtained for any of the four phenotypes was for marker D18S53 on chromosome 18p11 in GD (MLS 2.5). Additional suggestive linkages were found on chromosomes 2q36 (MLS 2.2) and 11p15 (MLS 2.0). Nominal evidence of linkage to GD (LOD, >1.0) was obtained for another nine regions, of which two, on chromosomes 5q23 (MLS 1.6) and Xp11 (MLS 1.6), showed linkage to GD with MLS greater than 1.5. Simulation studies predicted that only one GD locus would be expected by chance, suggesting that two of the three GD loci with suggestive evidence for linkage may represent true positives.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Summary of markers exceeding thresholds for suggestive LODs as defined by simulation data

 

Figure 2
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. A, Multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis of chromosome 2 for GD gave an MLS of 2.2 at marker D2S338, exceeding the threshold for suggestive linkage, as defined by simulation data. B, Multipoint, nonparametric linkage analysis of chromosome 11 for GD gave an MLS of 2.0 at marker D11S902, exceeding the threshold for suggestive linkage, as defined by simulation data. C, Multipoint, nonparametric linkage analysis of chromosome 18 for GD gave an MLS of 2.5 at marker D18S53, exceeding the threshold for suggestive linkage as defined by simulation data.

 
For AIH, four regions, on chromosomes 1p36 (MLS 1.6), 14p11 (MLS 1.7), 17q21 (MLS 1.7), and 19q13 (MLS 1.7), showed elevated LODs, yet these did not reach the empirical LOD threshold for suggestive linkage of 1.8 defined by simulation studies.

None of the markers showed linkage to the AITD cohort as a whole. Consistent with this, no single marker showed suggestive linkage to both GD and AIH phenotypes. Although separate markers on chromosome 5 showed linkage to GD and AIH, these markers are located at 5q23 and 5p14, respectively, and are therefore likely to represent distinct susceptibility loci.

The highest MLS obtained for the AB subset of patients (those with positive autoantibodies) was 1.4 on chromosome 9p21. This was derived principally from the GD subset of families who showed nominal linkage to this region (MLS 1.34), because linkage to AIH was not observed at this locus.

No linkage on chromosome 6 in the region of the HLA locus was observed for any of the four phenotypic traits (GD, AIH, AITD, or AB) despite the presence of markers localized in the class I and II regions of the major histocompatibility complex.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study we empirically defined linkage thresholds for AITD, GD, AIH, and AB phenotypes. Even with such a large dataset, we were unable to find convincing evidence of significant linkage to AITD or the GD, AIH, or AB phenotype. These data indicate that there is no single major locus for the development of AITDs, including the HLA region on chromosome 6, and suggest instead that genetic susceptibility to AITD results from numerous loci, each contributing small effects.

We found evidence suggestive of linkage to three regions for GD (chromosomes 2q36, 11p15, and 18p11). Elevated LODs were obtained for two additional regions (on chromosomes 5q23 and Xp11) for GD and four regions for AIH (on chromosomes 1p36, 14p11, 17q21, and 19q13). None of the linkages obtained for GD or AIH was the same, and none of these showed more than nominal linkage to the combined AITD cohort.

Our strongest region of linkage, to marker D18S53 on chromosome 18p11 in the GD families, has not been previously reported for GD, although nominal evidence of linkage was observed in a study of Old Order Amish families with positive TPO or TG antibodies (20). This region contains a number of genes involved with immune system function, including another member of the PTP family (PTPN2), which is involved with T cell proliferation and IL signaling; a member of the TNF superfamily (TNFSF5IP1); and a cell death activator (CIDE-A).

Evidence for the suggestive linkage to 11p15 overlaps with the type 1 diabetes (T1D) locus IDDM2 (MIM 125852) (31). Linkage of this region has also been reported to multiple sclerosis (32) and systemic lupus erythematosus (33). Although in T1D, this linkage has been largely attributed to the variable number of tandem repeats located in the 5'-upstream region of INS (34), recent analysis in GD and multiple sclerosis patients suggests that the linkages to these diseases are likely to be the result of an alternative locus (32). The CD81 antigen, which plays a role in early T cell development, and the IGF-II precursor (IGF2) are two such candidate loci.

Nominal linkage (defined here as MLS >1.5) was found in an additional seven regions, on chromosomes 1p36, 5q23, 9p21, 14p11, 17q21, 19q13, and Xp11. Linkage to 1p36, observed in this study for AIH, has previously been reported for a number of autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (33, 35), multiple sclerosis (36), ankylosing spondylitis (37), rheumatoid arthritis (38), and inflammatory bowel disease (39). In addition, a proximal region at 1p31-p32 has been linked to vitiligo and AIH (40).

Previous linkage has been reported to 5q33 in a number of autoimmune conditions, including AITD. The region Xp11 showing linkage to GD in this study is the same region previously reported to be linked to GD. A Toll-like receptor precursor (TLR7) is a candidate gene located in this region. Toll-like receptors recognize microbial pathogens and trigger innate immune responses.

Although there is convincing evidence that HLA, CTLA-4, and PTPN22 are genetic susceptibility factors for AITD, we have been unable to detect linkage to these loci despite the fact that the analysis included markers within these gene regions. This suggests that the contributions of these loci are insufficient to be detected by linkage. Consistent with this, the odds ratio for HLA has previously been estimated from several association studies to be between 1.9 and 4.0. This is in marked contrast to T1D (41) and rheumatoid arthritis (42), in which the HLA region is the major locus, conferring 40–50% of the genetic susceptibility.

Our data do not support other previously reported linkages, including those on chromosomes 8q24 (22, 23), 12q22 (23), 13q32 (23), 14q31 (43), 18q21 (44), 20q11 (45, 46), and Xq21 (23). This lack of replication may arise from the differences in size or ethnic origin between the cohorts or the statistical methods used. This study reports a nonparametric linkage analysis of 1119 Caucasian AITD-affected relative pairs. Sakai et al. (22) also used a nonparametric linkage approach, but on a cohort of 123 Japanese AITD-affected sibling pairs. In contrast Tomer et al. (23) used a parametric linkage approach on a cohort numbering a maximum of 102 multiplex families (although most linkages reported were on smaller GD or HT subsets) of diverse ethnic origin (including families from North America, Israel, the United Kingdom, and Italy). Underpowered studies and genetic heterogeneity are well recognized to be major factors confounding replication in linkage studies and are likely to be the explanation for the differences between the linkages reported in this study and those cited in previous AITD genome scans.

Although the current linkage study in AITD is considerably larger than those in any previous studies, we have still been unable to detect a major locus for AITD. This suggests that the genetic susceptibility to AITD comprises a number of loci, each with modest effects, and that alternative strategies are required for their detection.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank all the families with AITD who kindly agreed to participate in this study, all the research nurses who assisted with the recruitment of families, and Russell Metcalfe, who helped with the serological analyses.


    Footnotes
 
The URL for data presented here is Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/(for GD, HT, IDDM-2, IDDM-X).

This work was supported by Oxagen Ltd. L.H. and T.H.B. were supported by the Agnes and Knut Moerk Foundation.

First Published Online November 8, 2005

Abbreviations: AB, Individual with positive thyroid autoantibodies; AIH, autoimmune hypothyroidism; AITD, autoimmune thyroid disease(s); CI, confidence interval; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 gene; GD, Graves’ disease; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; HT, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis; LYP, lymphoid protein tyrosine phosphatase; MLS, maximum LOD score; PTPN22, gene encoding lymphoid protein tyrosine phosphatase; T1D, type 1 diabetes; TG, thyroglobulin; TPO, thyroid peroxidase; TSHR, TSH receptor.

Received April 1, 2005.

Accepted October 27, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Dayan CM, Daniels GH 1996 Chronic autoimmune thyroiditis. N Engl J Med 335:99–107[Free Full Text]
  2. Weetman AP 2000 Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med 343:1236–1248[Free Full Text]
  3. Stenszky V, Kozma L, Balazs C, Rochlitz S, Bear JC, Farid NR 1985 The genetics of Graves’ disease: HLA and disease susceptibility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 61:735–740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Roman SH, Greenberg D, Rubinstein P, Wallenstein S, Davies TF 1992 Genetics of autoimmune thyroid disease: lack of evidence for linkage to HLA within families. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 74:496–503[Abstract]
  5. Shields DC, Ratanachaiyavong S, McGregor AM, Collins A, Morton NE 1994 Combined segregation and linkage analysis of Graves disease with a thyroid autoantibody diathesis. Am J Hum Genet 55:540–554[Medline]
  6. Rose NR, Bacon LD, Sundick RS 1976 Genetic determinants of thyroiditis in the OS chicken. Transplant Rev 31:264–285[Medline]
  7. Brix TH, Kyvik KO, Hegedus L 1998 What is the evidence of genetic factors in the etiology of Graves’ disease? A brief review. Thyroid 8:627–634[Medline]
  8. Brix TH, Christensen K, Holm NV, Harvald B, Hegedus L 1998 A population-based study of Graves’ disease in Danish twins. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 48:397–400[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Brix TH, Hegedus L 2000 Genetic and environmental factors in the aetiology of simple goitre. Ann Med 32:153–156[Medline]
  10. Brix TH, Kyvik KO, Christensen K, Hegedus L 2001 Evidence for a major role of heredity in Graves’ disease: a population-based study of two Danish twin cohorts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:930–934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Brix TH, Kyvik KO, Hegedus L 2000 A population-based study of chronic autoimmune hypothyroidism in Danish twins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:536–539[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Heward JM, Allahabadia A, Daykin J, Carr-Smith J, Daly A, Armitage M, Dodson PM, Sheppard MC, Barnett AH, Franklyn JA, Gough SC 1998 Linkage disequilibrium between the human leukocyte antigen class II region of the major histocompatibility complex and Graves’ disease: replication using a population case control and family-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3394–3397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hunt PJ, Marshall SE, Weetman AP, Bunce M, Bell JI, Wass JA, Welsh KI 2001 Histocompatibility leucocyte antigens and closely linked immunomodulatory genes in autoimmune thyroid disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 55:491–499[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Gough SC 2000 The genetics of Graves’ disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 29:255–266[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Heward JM, Allahabadia A, Armitage M, Hattersley A, Dodson PM, Macleod K, Carr-Smith J, Daykin J, Daly A, Sheppard MC, Holder RL, Barnett AH, Franklyn JA, Gough SC 1999 The development of Graves’ disease and the CTLA-4 gene on chromosome 2q33. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2398–2401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Vaidya B, Imrie H, Perros P, Young, ET, Kelly WF, Carr D, Large DM, Toft AD, McCarthy MI, Kendall-Taylor P, Pearce SH 1999 The cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 is a major Graves’ disease locus. Hum Mol Genet 8:1195–1199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ueda H, Howson JM, Esposito L, Heward J, Snook H, Chamberlain G, Rainbow DB, Hunter KM, Smith AN, Di Genova G, Herr MH, Dahlman I, Payne F, Smyth D, Lowe C, Twells RC, Howlett S, Healy B, Nutland S, Rance HE, Everett V, Smink LJ, Lam AC, Cordell HJ, Walker NM, Bordin C, Hulme J, Motzo C, Cucca F, Hess JF, Metzker ML, Rogers J, Gregory S, Allahabadia A, Nithiyananthan R, Tuomilehto-Wolf E, Tuomilehto J, Bingley P, Gillespie KM, Undlien DE, Ronningen KS, Guja C, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Savage DA, Maxwell AP, Carson DJ, Patterson CC, Franklyn JA, Clayton DG, Peterson LB, Wicker LS, Todd JA, Gough SC 2003 Association of the T-cell regulatory gene CTLA4 with susceptibility to autoimmune disease. Nature 423:506–511[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Smyth D, Cooper J, Collins J, Heward JM, Franklyn JA, Howson JM, Vella A, Nutland S, Rance HE, Maier L, Barratt BJ, Guja C, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Savage DA, Dunger DB, Widmer B, Strachan DP, Ring SM, Walker N, Clayton DG, Twells RC, Gough SC, Todd JA 2004 Replication of an association between the lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase locus (LYP/PTPN22) with type 1 diabetes, and evidence for its role as a general autoimmunity locus. Diabetes 53:3020–3023[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Velaga M, Wilson V, Jennings C, Owen CJ, Herington S, Donaldson PT, Ball SG, James RA, Quinton R, Perros P, Pearce SH 2004 The codon 620 tryptophan allele of the lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase (LYP) gene is a major determinant of Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:5862–5865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Allen E, Hsueh W, Sabra M, Pollin TI, Ladenson PW, Silver KD, Mitchell BD, Shuldiner AR 2003 A genome-wide scan for autoimmune thyroiditis in the Old Order Amish: replication of genetic linkage on chromosome 5q11.2-q14.3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1292–1296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Jin Y, Teng W, Ben S, Xiong X, Zhang J, Xu S, Shugart YY, Jin L, Chen J, Huang W 2003 Genome-wide scan of graves’ disease: evidence for linkage on chromosome 5q31 in Chinese Han pedigrees. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1798–1803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sakai K, Shirasawa S, Ishikawa N, Ito K, Tamai H, Kuma K, Akamizu T, Tanimura M, Furugaki K, Yamamoto K, Sasazuki T 2001 Identification of susceptibility loci for autoimmune thyroid disease to 5q31–q33 and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis to 8q23–q24 by multipoint affected sib-pair linkage analysis in Japanese. Hum Mol Genet 10:1379–13786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Tomer Y, Ban Y, Concepcion E, Barbesino G, Villanueva R, Greenberg DA, Davies TF 2003 Common and unique susceptibility loci in Graves and Hashimoto diseases: results of whole-genome screening in a data set of 102 multiplex families. Am J Hum Genet 73:736–747[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Brix TH, Hansen PS, Kyvik KO, Hegedus L 2004 Aggregation of thyroid autoantibodies in first-degree relatives of patients with autoimmune thyroid disease is mainly due to genes: a twin study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 60:329–334[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Vanderpump MP, Tunbridge WM, French JM, Appleton D, Bates D, Clark F, Grimley Evans J, Hasan DM, Rodgers H, Tunbridge F 1995 The incidence of thyroid disorders in the community: a twenty-year follow-up of the Whickham Survey. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 43:55–68[Medline]
  26. Weetman AP, Rennie DP, Hassman R, Hall R, McGregor AM 1984 Enzyme-linked immunoassay of monoclonal and serum microsomal autoantibodies. Clin Chim Acta 138:237–244[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR 2001 GRR: graphical representation of relationship errors. Bioinformatics 17:742–743[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. O’Connell JR, Weeks DE 1998 PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 63:259–266[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR 2002 Merlin–rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat Genet 30:97–101[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Whittemore AS, Halpern J 1994 A class of tests for linkage using affected pedigree members. Biometrics 50:118–127[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Davies JL, Kawaguchi Y, Bennett ST, Copeman JB, Cordell HJ, Pritchard LE, Reed PW, Gough SC, Jenkins SC, Palmer SM 1994 A genome-wide search for human type 1 diabetes susceptibility genes. Nature 371:130–136[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Tait KF, Collins JE, Heward JM, Eaves I, Snook H, Franklyn JA, Barnett AH, Todd JA, Maranian M, Compston A, Sawcer S, Gough SC 2004 Evidence for a type 1 diabetes-specific mechanism for the insulin gene-associated IDDM2 locus rather than a general influence on autoimmunity. Diabet Med 21:267–270[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Gaffney PM, Kearns GM, Shark KB, Ortmann WA, Selby SA, Malogren ML, Rohlf KE, Ockenden TC, Messner RP, King RA, Rich SS, Behrens TW 1998 A genome-wide search for susceptibility genes in human systemic lupus erythematosus sib-pair families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:14875–14879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Bennett ST, Lucassen AM, Gough SC, Powell EE, Undlien DE, Pritchard LE, Merriman ME, Kawaguchi Y, Dronsfield MJ, Pociot F 1995 Susceptibility to human type 1 diabetes at IDDM2 is determined by tandem repeat variation at the insulin gene minisatellite locus. Nat Genet 9:284–292[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Shai R, Quismorio Jr FP, Li L, Kwon OJ, Morrison J, Wallace DJ, Neuwelt CM, Brautbar C, Gauderman WJ, Jacob CO 1999 Genome-wide screen for systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility genes in multiplex families. Hum Mol Genet 8:639–644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Ebers GC, Kukay K, Bulman DE, Sadovnick AD, Rice G, Anderson C, Armstrong H, Cousin K, Bell RB, Hader W, Paty DW, Hashimoto S, Oger J, Duquette P, Warren S, Gray T, O’Connor P, Nath A, Auty A, Metz L, Francis G, Paulseth JE, Murray TJ, Pryse-Phillips W, Risch N 1996 A full genome search in multiple sclerosis. Nat Genet 13:472–476[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Laval SH, Timms A, Edwards S, Bradbury L, Brophy S, Milicic A, Rubin L, Siminovitch KA, Weeks DE, Calin A, Wordsworth BP, Brown MA 2001 Whole-genome screening in ankylosing spondylitis: evidence of non-MHC genetic-susceptibility loci. Am J Hum Genet 68:918–926[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Cornelis F, Faure S, Martinez M, Prud’homme JF, Fritz P, Dib C, Alves H, Barrera P, de Vries N, Balsa A, Pascual-Salcedo D, Maenaut K, Westhovens R, Migliorini P, Tran TH, Delaye A, Prince N, Lefevre C, Thomas G, Poirier M, Soubigou S Alibert O, Lasbleiz S, Fouix S, Weissenbach J 1998 New susceptibility locus for rheumatoid arthritis suggested by a genome-wide linkage study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:10746–10750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Cho JH, Nicolae DL, Ramos R, Fields CT, Rabenau K, Corradino S, Brant SR, Espinosa R, LeBeau M, Hanauer SB, Bodzin J, Bonen DK 2000 Linkage and linkage disequilibrium in chromosome band 1p36 in American Chaldeans with inflammatory bowel disease. Hum Mol Genet 9:1425–1432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Alkhateeb A, Stetler GL, Old W, Talbert J, Uhlhorn C, Taylor M, Fox A, Miller C, Dills DG, Ridgway EC, Bennett DC, Fain PR, Spritz RA 2002 Mapping of an autoimmunity susceptibility locus (AIS1) to chromosome 1p31.3-p32.2. Hum Mol Genet 11:661–667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Cox NJ, Wapelhorst B, Morrison VA, Johnson L, Pinchuk L, Spielman RS, Todd JA, Concannon P 2001 Seven regions of the genome show evidence of linkage to type 1 diabetes in a consensus analysis of 767 multiplex families. Am J Hum Genet 69:820–830[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Jawaheer D, Seldin MF, Amos CI, Chen WV, Shigeta R, Etzel C, Damle A, Xiao X, Chen D, Lum RF, Monteiro J, Kern M, Criswell LA, Albani S, Nelson JL, Clegg DO, Pope R, Schroeder HW, Bridges SL, Pisetsky DS, Ward R, Kastner DL, Wilder RL, Pincus T, Callahan LF, Flemming D, Wener MH, Gregersen PK 2003 Screening the genome for rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility genes: a replication study and combined analysis of 512 multicase families. Arthritis Rheum 48:906–916[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Tomer Y, Barbesino G, Keddache M, Greenberg DA, Davies TF 1997 Mapping of a major susceptibility locus for Graves’ disease (GD-1) to chromosome 14q31. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1645–1648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Vaidya B, Imrie H, Perros P, Young ET, Kelly WF, Carr D, Large DM, Toft AD, Kendall-Taylor P, Pearce SH 2000 Evidence for a new Graves disease susceptibility locus at chromosome 18q21. Am J Hum Genet 66:1710–1714[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Pearce SH, Vaidya B, Imrie H, Perros P, Kelly WF, Toft AD, McCarthy MI, Young ET, Kendall-Taylor P 1999 Further evidence for a susceptibility locus on chromosome 20q13.11 in families with dominant transmission of Graves disease. Am J Hum Genet 65:1462–1465[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Tomer Y, Barbesino G, Greenberg DA, Concepcion E, Davies TF 1998 A new Graves disease-susceptibility locus maps to chromosome 20q11.2. International Consortium for the Genetics of Autoimmune Thyroid Disease. Am J Hum Genet 63:1749–1756[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. S. Douglas, T. H. Brix, C. J. Hwang, L. Hegedus, and T. J. Smith
Divergent Frequencies of IGF-I Receptor-Expressing Blood Lymphocytes in Monozygotic Twin Pairs Discordant for Graves' Disease: Evidence for a Phenotypic Signature Ascribable to Nongenetic Factors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2009; 94(5): 1797 - 1802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. S. Anderson
Update in Endocrine Autoimmunity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2008; 93(10): 3663 - 3670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Kondrashova, H. Viskari, A.-M. Haapala, T. Seiskari, P. Kulmala, J. Ilonen, M. Knip, and H. Hyoty
Serological Evidence of Thyroid Autoimmunity among Schoolchildren in Two Different Socioeconomic Environments
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 729 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
C. J Owen, J. A Eden, C. E Jennings, V. Wilson, T. D Cheetham, and S. H S Pearce
Genetic association studies of the FOXP3 gene in Graves' disease and autoimmune Addison's disease in the United Kingdom population.
J. Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 37(1): 97 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. A. Aliesky, P. N. Pichurin, C.-R. Chen, R. W. Williams, B. Rapoport, and S. M. McLachlan
Probing the Genetic Basis for Thyrotropin Receptor Antibodies and Hyperthyroidism in Immunized CXB Recombinant Inbred Mice
Endocrinology, June 1, 2006; 147(6): 2789 - 2800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weetman, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weetman, A. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Thyroid


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals