help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2005-1580
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/2/555    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Leener, A.
Right arrow Articles by Costagliola, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Leener, A.
Right arrow Articles by Costagliola, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*OMIM*Protein
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 2 555-562
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Presence and Absence of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Mutations Provide Some Insights into Spontaneous Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Physiopathology

A. De Leener, L. Montanelli, J. Van Durme, Heedong Chae, G. Smits, G. Vassart and S. Costagliola

Interdisciplinary Research Institute for Human and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, and Department of Genetics, Erasme Hospital (G.S., G.V.), Free University of Brussels (A.D.L., L.M., J.V.D., G.S., G.V., S.C.), B-1070, Brussels, Belgium; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center (H.C.), Seoul, 138-736, Korea

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. S. Costagliola, Interdisciplinary Research Institute for Human and Molecular Biology, Free University of Brussels, 808 Lennik Street, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: scostag{at}ulb.ac.be.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially life-threatening complication of ovarian stimulation treatments. Moreover, four mutations of the FSH receptor (FSHr) were recently described in patients presenting with spontaneous OHSS (sOHSS) of the first trimester of pregnancy with normal levels of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG).

Objective: The objective of this study was to look for novel FSHr mutations in patients with sOHSS associated with different levels of hCG and TSH to 1) find new residues important for FSHr activation and specificity, and 2) better delineate the pathophysiology of the different presentations of sOHSS.

Design, Intervention, and Patients: After blood sampling, we sequenced the FSHr from genomic leukocytes DNA from eight patients with sOHSS of the first or second trimester of pregnancy with normal or high hCG levels or with high TSH levels associated with severe hypothyroidism.

Setting: This study was performed at a university laboratory.

Main Outcome Measure: The main outcome measure was FSHr sequencing and in vitro evaluation of the variation of cAMP production of FSHr mutants.

Results: A new mutation was found in the patient with sOHSS of the first trimester of pregnancy with a normal hCG level: I5.54545T, in transmembrane helix V of the FSHr. When tested functionally, this mutant displayed promiscuous activation by both hCG and TSH together with detectable constitutive activity. In contrast, no mutations were found in the FSHr from patients with high hCG or TSH levels, indicating that for those seven patients, sOHSS results from the natural promiscuous stimulation of a wild-type FSHr by very high concentrations of hCG or TSH.

Conclusions: sOHSS can occur by at least three different pathophysiological mechanisms.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
FSH, LH, CHORIONIC gonadotropin (CG), and TSH constitute the glycoprotein hormones made of a common {alpha}-subunit and specific ß-subunits that share more than 40% amino acid sequence identities. Although the corresponding glycoprotein hormone receptors [FSHr (1), LH/CG receptor (2, 3), and TSH receptor (TSHr) (4)] also display about 40% sequence identity in their hormone binding domains, coevolution of the hormone-receptor couples resulted in the establishment of tight specificity barriers, preventing promiscuous activation under normal physiological conditions (5). The emergence of CG in primates, which achieves very high concentrations during early pregnancy (6), constituted an evolutionary challenge to this specificity barrier. In humans, in particular during the first trimester of pregnancy, human CG (hCG) reaches concentrations at which it displays some thyrotropic activity, bringing most pregnant women on the fringe of hyperthyroidism (7). Accordingly, overproduction of hCG, as observed in molar or twin pregnancies, may result in overt gestational hyperthyroidism (8).

In agreement with these ideas, one would expect mutations affecting the hormone binding surface of the TSHr or FSHr (9) to be responsible for rare cases of gestational hyperthyroidism or spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (sOHSS), presenting with normal hCG concentrations. Although this prediction has been verified in one familial case of gestational hyperthyroidism caused by mutation in the hormone binding domain of the TSHr (10), to date all cases of sOHSS have been associated with mutations in the rhodopsin-like serpentine domain of the FSHr implicated in transduction of the activation signal to the interior of the cell (11, 12, 13, 14, 15).

In the present study we report a novel mutation of the FSHr (I5.54545T; for numbering system, see Patients and Methods) in a patient who presented sOHSS at 12 wk of pregnancy (16). Again, the mutation was located in the serpentine domain of the FSHr affecting a residue located close to the cytoplasmic border of transmembrane helix 5 (TM-V), but outside the hot spots of TM-III or TM-VI, where sOHSS mutations have been described to date (11, 12, 13, 14, 15). When it was explored functionally in transfected cells and structurally by molecular modeling, the mutant pointed to a role of residue I5.54 in stabilizing TM-III, TM-V, and TM-VI in the inactive state.

In addition, since the description of the first sOHSS FSHr mutation in 2003, we also had access to DNA from four other cases of sOHSS related to high hCG levels (17, 18, 19, 20) and to three DNA samples from patients who presented sOHSS in relation to severe hypothyroidism (21, 22) (M. H. Hedayati Omami, unpublished case). To explore the possibility of a relation between these sOHSS presentations and the FSHr, we sequenced the latter in the seven patients; no mutations were found. This absence of FSHr mutation in light of the in vitro demonstration of stimulation of FSHr by high concentrations of hCG and TSH (11, 23, 24, 25, 26) indicates that natural promiscuous activation of the wild-type FSHr by high levels of hCG or TSH is the likely explanation for these sporadic sOHSS presentations.

In conclusion, we propose, for future research and clinical use, a classification based on the three different pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the occurrence of sOHSS (see Fig. 4Go).


Figure 4
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Proposition of classification of the various types of sOHSS.

 

    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Numbering system of G protein-coupled receptors

The standardized numbering system of Ballesteros and Weinstein (27) was used throughout the manuscript. This allows easy identification and comparison of residues in the transmembrane segments of different receptors (27).

Reagent

Recombinant human FSH (rhFSH; purified) was purchased from Organon Belge (Brussels, Belgium), rhCG from was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, MO), and rhTSH was purchased from Genzyme (Cambridge, MA).

Patients

The clinical characteristics of the sOHSS patient with the new FSHr mutation have been described previously (16). Briefly, the proband was a 35-yr-old Korean woman, gravida 2, para 1, presenting severe sOHSS at wk 12 of her second pregnancy (first pregnancy was uneventful). Symptoms regressed during the second and third trimesters and resolved in postpartum. Her medical and family histories were unremarkable. All other sOHSS patients for whom no FSHr mutation was found were previously described (Table 1Go), except the Iranian case referred by Dr. M. H. Hedayati Omami. His 15-yr-old patient presented an association of hypothyroidism and moderate sOHSS symptoms. Her TSH serum levels were greater than 100 µU/ml, and total T4 was less than 2 µg/ml. An autoimmune primary diagnosis was made because of the presence of antithyroid peroxidase antibodies. After a few months of levothyroxine therapy, TSH and T4 levels returned to normal as did the size of her ovaries. Interestingly, her cousin presented exactly the same associations of symptoms as hypothyroidism presentation. Unfortunately, only blood samples from the proband were available for DNA extraction.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Synthesis of the different patients sequenced to date

 
DNA sequencing

Human DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes, and the sequences of all the exons of the FSHr gene together with intron-exon boundaries were determined as previously described (13). The patients gave informed consent to participation in this study, which was approved by the ethical committee of Erasme Hospital (Brussels, Belgium). The sequence of the segment harboring the I5.54545T mutation was determined from the product of two independent PCRs. The I5.54545T mutation introduces a BstEII restriction site, thus generating mutation-specific bands at 343 and 190 bp from the PCR product obtained with the proband DNA. A restriction fragment length polymorphism assay using BstEII was used to screen for the presence of the mutation in 167 normal subjects, including 73 ethnically matched individuals.

Construction of human FSHr mutants

Mutations were introduced into the human wild-type FSHr (wt-hFSHr) cloned in the pSVL vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) by site mutagenesis as previously described (25).

Transfection experiments

COS-7 cells were used for all transient expression experiments as previously described (25). For hormone stimulation or binding experiments, a 24-well alternative protocol was used to minimize the amount of hormones needed, as described previously (25). To demonstrate that generation of cAMP by the basal activity of the mutants (when present) is linearly related to the number of receptors present at the cell surface, variable amounts of wt-hFSHr and various I5.54545 mutants were transfected into COS cells (complemented to 1 µg DNA with empty pSVL vector).

Quantification of cell surface expression by FACS

Two days after transfection, cell surface expression was assessed by FACS (FACScan flow cytofluorometer, BD Biosciences, Erembodegem, Belgium) with mouse monoclonal antibodies 5B2 as previously described (25). Cells transfected with pSVL alone (empty vector) and with pSVL-wt-hFSHr (wt sequence) were always used as negative and positive controls, respectively.

Determination of cAMP production

Forty-eight or 72 h after transfection, the intracellular accumulation of cAMP was measured as previously described (25). cAMP concentrations were determined in quadruplicate on extracts from duplicate transfection dishes or wells. Results are expressed as picomoles of cAMP per milliliter or as a percentage of the maximal cAMP response.

Conversion between international units per milliliter and nanograms per milliliters or nanomolar concentrations

A quantity of 1 IU/ml rhCG corresponds to 62 ng/ml, or 2 nM (Sigma-Aldrich Corp.); 1 IU/ml rhFSH corresponds to 100 ng/ml, or 3.3 nM (Puregon, Organon Belge); and 1 mIU/ml rhTSH equals 125 ng/ml, or 4 nM (Thyrogen, Genzyme).

Molecular modeling

The structure of bovine rhodopsin (Protein Data Bank code: 1GZM) (28) was used as template for wt and mutants FSHr models, built with the WHAT IF program (29). All images of the models were generated using the YASARA package (30).

Statistical analysis

Receptor expression at the cell surface, constitutive activities (raw values or normalized), and cAMP production after hCG or TSH stimulation of the mutant FSHrs and wt-hFSHr were compared using the nonparametric paired Wilcoxon test and Instat version 3 (GraphPad, Inc., San Diego, CA), performed with at least four independent experiments. Difference was considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Functional characterization of the novel I5.54545T FSHr mutant

A heterozygous substitution of thymidine for cytosine at the second base of codon 545 was identified in exon 10 of the FSHr gene of a patient presenting with sOHSS (Fig. 1Go, A and B; see case report in Patients and Methods and Ref.16). None of 167 DNA samples from unrelated normal subjects, including 73 ethnically matched individuals, carried the mutation, ruling out the possibility of a common polymorphism. This novel mutation results in the replacement of an isoleucine (I) by a threonine (T; I5.54545T; for numbering system, see Patients and Methods). This Ile residue is located at the cytoplasmic extremity of TM-V (Fig. 1CGo). It is conserved in human LH receptor, but changed for a valine (V) in human TSHr.


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Presentation of the mutation. A, Representation of the nucleotide sequence around the codon 545 of the FSHr in the patient presenting sOHSS. The patient is heterozygote for the substitution T to C that changes the amino acid isoleucine in threonine (I5.54545T). B, Results of a restriction fragment length polymorphism assay for detection of the I5.54545T mutation. The BstEII restriction enzyme cleaves once the 533-bp PCR product is obtained from one allele of the proband (upper band), generating two fragments of 343 and 190 bp (lane 1). This restriction site is absent in the PCR product of the other allele of the proband (lane 1) and in DNA from normal subjects (lane 2). C and D, Models of the environment at position 5.54 in the wt- and mutant FSHr. Helices are represented as ribbons (red, TM-III; blue, TM-V; green, TM-VI), whereas residue side chains are represented as sticks. C, The wt-I5.54545. D, Mutant I5.54545T.

 
The I5.54545T FSHr mutant was analyzed functionally by transient expression in COS-7 cells. Despite the reduction of expression at the cell surface (77% of the wt-hFSHr; Fig. 2AGo), the mutant displayed modest, but definite, constitutive activity compared with the totally silent wt-hFSHr (130% of the cAMP level achieved in cells transfected with the wt-hFSHr or empty vector plasmid; P < 0.05; nonparametric paired Wilcoxon test; see Fig. 2Go, B and C). As expected from results with previously described sOHSS mutations, the I5.54545T mutant showed clear lowering of its specificity toward both rhCG and rhTSH (Fig. 2Go, E and F). Neither the affinity (IC50, 0.18 ± 0.15 IU/ml for wt-hFSHr and 0.14 ± 0.11 UI/ml for I5.54545T, respectively) nor the sensitivity (EC50, 0.086 ± 0.009 UI/ml for wt-hFSHr and 0.029 ± 0.001 for I5.54545T, respectively) to the natural FSH agonist was affected by the mutation (Fig. 2DGo).


Figure 2
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Functional characterization of the I5.54545T mutation. A, Expression levels of empty vector, wt-hFSHr, and I5.54545T mutant receptor represented as a percentage of the wt expression. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected in 3-cm wells, and 2 d later the expression of the receptor was determined by FACS. Results are expressed as the mean ± range of one representative experiment of five that gave similar results. B and C, Levels of cAMP observed in cells transfected with the empty vector, wt-hFSHr, and the I5.54545T mutant receptor without any stimulation. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected in 3-cm wells; 2 d later, basal accumulation of cAMP was measured by RIA. The results are expressed as picomoles per milliliter (B) or the ratio between basal cAMP accumulation and expression at the cell surface compared with wt-hFSHr (C). Constitutive activities of the I5.54545T mutant and the wt-hFSHr were compared using the nonparametric paired Wilcoxon test and GraphPad Instat version 3, performed with five independent experiments. The difference was considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. D–F, Stimulation of wt-hFSHr and I5.54545T mutant with increasing concentrations of rhFSH (D), rhCG (E), and rhTSH (F). COS-7 cells transiently transfected in 10-cm petri dishes with the various constructions were trypsinized in 24-well plates and stimulated with various concentrations of the hormones. Intracellular cAMP accumulation was determined by RIA. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM picomoles per milliliter of cAMP. Each graph is representative of at least three independent experiments.

 
Interestingly, the patient did not complain of ovarian hyperstimulation symptoms during her first pregnancy. This discordance with the recurrence of symptoms observed in the cases described previously (12, 31, 32) could reflect 1) a painless, mild grade sOHSS during the first pregnancy related to the moderate effect of the mutation as observed in vitro (for example, a D6.30567G mutated patient presented a mild sOHSS) (14, 15, 17), and/or 2) a pregnancy associated with hCG levels below the threshold required to induce the disease (33).

Phenotype of other I5.54545 mutants

To explore the molecular mechanisms of the gain of function caused by substitutions at position 5.54, a panel of mutants was engineered in which I5.54545 was replaced by six different amino acids with diverse physicochemical properties (A, F, L, N, T, and V). After transient expression in COS-7 cells, differences were observed in the level of expression at the cell surface of individual mutants, ranging from 22–107% of the wt-hFSHr (Fig. 3AGo). Unexpectedly, the conservative substitution of I5.54545 by a leucine (L) had the most dramatic effect on both cell surface expression (22% of the wt-hFSHr) and constitutive activity (Fig. 3BGo). In contrast, the basal activity of the other mutants was barely measurable (I5.54545F and, to a lesser extent, I5.54545N and I5.54545T) or, as for the wt-hFSHr, undetectable (I5.54545A and I5.54545V). To reliably compare the constitutive activities of mutants I5.54545L, F, N, and T despite wide differences in expression at the cell surface, we transfected COS cells with various amounts of the wt-hFSHr and three mutant constructs (I5.54545T, L, and V). cAMP production was plotted as a function of surface expression, measured by FACS (Fig. 3CGo). No deviation from linearity was observed, demonstrating the validity of the normalization method even when barely measurable cAMP values are divided by FACS results (Fig. 3DGo). This experiment (Fig. 3CGo) also demonstrates the very low constitutive activity of wt-hFSHr and I5.54545V mutant.


Figure 3
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Functional characterization of the I5.54545 mutants. A, Expression levels of the empty vector, wt-hFSHr, and the various I5.54545 mutant receptors on the cell surface. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected in 10-cm wells with the various constructions. The day after transfection, the cells were trypsinized in 24-well plates; 2 d later, the expression of the receptor was determined by FACS. Results are expressed as a percentage of wt-hFSHr and as the mean ± range. B, Levels of cAMP observed in COS-7 cells transiently transfected with empty vector, wt-hFSHr, and I5.54545 FSH receptor mutants under basal conditions are expressed in picomoles per milliliter (mean ± SEM; one representative experiment of four that gave similar results). C, Illustration of the validity of the method used to normalize cAMP production to cell surface expression of the constructs (as represented in E). A clear linear relation was observed between receptor expression, as measured by FACS, and the intracellular levels of cAMP achieved in transfected COS cells. D, Levels of cAMP (mean ± SEM) observed in COS-7 cells transiently transfected with empty vector, wt-hFSHr, and the I5.54545 FSHr mutants under basal conditions. Results are expressed as the ratio between basal cAMP accumulation over expression at the cell surface, with the value for wt-hFSHr set at 1. For graphical representation, constructs presenting very low or undetectable basal cAMP values were normalized to a ratio of 1 (wt-hFSHr, I5.54545A, and I5.54545V). E, Levels of cAMP observed in transiently transfected COS-7 cells with empty vector, wt-hFSHr, and the I5.54 545 FSHr mutants under basal conditions or after stimulation with 10 UI/ml rhFSH, 300 IU/ml rhCG or 100 mIU/ml rhTSH. Results are expressed as picomoles per milliliter of cAMP. F, Stimulation of the I5.54545L mutant receptor with increasing concentration of rhFSH and rhCG. COS-7 cells transiently transfected in 10-cm petri dishes were trypsinized in 24-well plates and stimulated with various concentrations of the hormones, expressed in international units per milliliter. Intracellular cAMP accumulation was determined by RIA. Each graph is representative of four independent experiments. Mutants and wt-hFSHr were compared using the nonparametric paired Wilcoxon test and GraphPad Instat version 3. The difference was considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

 
The mutants were tested for their ability to be stimulated by rhFSH, rhCG, and rhTSH (Fig. 3EGo). All of them responded readily to rhFSH (Fig. 3DGo). In addition, except for I5.54545A and I5.54545V (for which no constitutive activity was detected), all mutants displayed an increase in sensitivity to stimulation by rhTSH and rhCG compared with wt-FSHr (P < 0.05, by nonparametric paired Wilcoxon test; Fig. 3EGo). Mutants I5.54545L and, to a lesser extent, I5.54545F (the two mutants with the strongest basal activity) were particularly sensitive to these two hormones. In particular, stimulation of the I5.54545L mutant by rhCG reached a maximal level similar to that achieved by a saturating concentration of rhFSH (Fig. 3FGo). Despite the increase in sensitivity of the I5.54545 mutants to hCG and, as previously described for other sOHSS mutants, the affinity for this hormone remained too low to be measured in direct binding experiments with [125I]hCG or by competition for binding of [125I]hFSH (data not shown).

Modelization of the environment of I5.54545

I5.54545 resides near the cytoplasmic extremity of TM-V. The model, elaborated on the atomic structure of bovine rhodopsin (34), predicts tight packing via hydrophobic interactions with residues T3.47464 and L3.43460 of TM3 and I6.41579 of TM-VI (Fig. 1CGo). The rhodopsin structure demonstrates the importance of the cytoplasmic portions of helices V and VI for interaction with the rhodopsin-specific G protein, transducin (28, 35). It is thus conceivable that any structural change disrupting the interactions of helices V and VI with the other helices could facilitate G protein binding and receptor activation.

Substitution of I5.54545 with T (or N) is predicted to interact with T3.44461 and/or T3.47464. This would pull helices III and V toward each other or could cause a reorganization of the local structure around TM-V (Fig. 1DGo). Introduction of an F (a larger and aromatic residue) or L (with a second {delta} atom compared with I) at this position would induce a clash with I6.41579 or T3.47464, respectively. The result is that interactions of TM-V and TM-VI with the rest of the molecule would be disrupted.

FSHr mutants with A or V at position 5.54545 do not display measurable basal activity. In agreement with our hypothesis, the models with the I5.54545A and I5.54545V substitutions predict neither atomic clashes nor the possibility of making new interactions (data not shown).

FSHr is not mutated in sOHSS associated with hypothyroidism or high hCG levels

The entire coding sequence and all intro-exon junctions of the FSHr gene were sequenced from leukocyte DNA in four patients with sOHSS and high hCG levels and in three patients with sOHSS symptoms and severe hypothyroidism (Table 1Go). No mutation was found.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The four FSHr mutations described to date in patients with sOHSS were all located in TM-III and TM-VI and were restricted to two residues (T3.32449I/A and D6.30567N/G) (11, 12, 13, 14, 15). When tested functionally in transiently transfected cells, all mutant receptors were abnormally sensitive to both hCG and TSH while simultaneously displaying constitutive activity.

In the present report we show that mutation of isoleucine in position 5.54545 into threonine is also associated with sOHSS and displays a similar in vitro phenotype as T3.32449I/A and D6.30567N/G when assayed in transfected cells. Residue 5.54545 is located at the cytoplasmic border of transmembrane helix V, a position that has previously been found mutated in TSHr (V5.54597F/L) and LH receptor (I5.54542L) in patients presenting severe thyrotoxicosis (36) or male-limited precocious puberty (37, 38), respectively. The present study and previous molecular dynamic analysis predict that even keeping the hydrophobic character at position 5.54, a small change in the physicochemical properties of the amino acid can trigger the release of interhelical interactions stabilizing the wild-type receptor (39), thus leading to its partial activation.

In agreement with previous observations (11, 12, 13, 14), the present results establish a clear relation between constitutive activity and lowering of specificity in FSHr mutants. This is consistent with our suggestion that the gain of sensitivity of the mutants to hCG (or TSH) would be due to the lowering of an intramolecular barrier to activation rather than to an increase in binding affinity (5).

Cases of sOHSS presenting with high levels of hCG have been frequently described in all trimesters of pregnancy (40). To compare their origins to the five mutated cases discussed here above, we sequenced the FSHr in one case of sOHSS of the first trimester of a twin pregnancy (17), two cases of OHSS of the first trimester with idiopathic unexplained high hCG levels (18, 19), and one case of sOHSS of the second trimester with elevated hCG levels on preeclampsia (20). No mutations were found. Hence, we are left with the hypothesis that this situation reflects natural promiscuity of the wt-hFSHr for hCG (11, 25, 26). As such, it would mirror, for the hCG-FSHr couple, the situation in molar or twin pregnancies, in which very high hCG concentrations are able to activate a wt-TSHr (8). However, we cannot exclude that a variant hCG, exhibiting higher biological activity, or granulosa cells in an autocrine environment more sensitive to FSHr stimulation might be implicated.

Finally, again by analogy with the five sOHSS mutated cases discussed above, we reasoned that mutations of the FSHr gene might be responsible for the relatively rare cases of OHSS occurring in profoundly hypothyroid (non) pregnant women (21, 22) (M. H. Hedayati Omami, unpublished case). No mutations were found. Then, as for sOHSS with high hCG levels, we have to postulate that this situation reflects natural promiscuity of the wt-FSHr for TSH (11, 23, 24, 25). It would be for the TSH-FSHr couple, the mirror image of gestational hyperthyroidism and TSHr stimulation by high levels of hCG (8). As in cases with high hCG and considering the rare incidence of sOHSS symptoms in hypothyroid patients, we cannot exclude that a variant TSH, exhibiting higher biological activity, or granulosa cells more sensitive to FSHr stimulation might be implicated.

In all patients in whom no mutation was found in the FSHr gene, we cannot exclude the possibility that a somatic mutation, with manifestation in the ovaries, but absent from leukocytes, could be responsible for the disease. Such a mutation should occur very early in development to account for the bilateral involvement of the ovaries. In the absence of clinical indication for ovarian biopsies, this hypothesis could not be tested.

Although more cases need to be investigated (we welcome, for FSHr sequencing, all well-documented cases), the present results point to genes or mechanisms unrelated to FSHr mutations for the various pathophysiological origins of sOHSS. These different mechanisms have been summarized in Fig. 4Go by classification of sOHSS in three types. Type I corresponds to the mutated FSHr cases. Type II corresponds to the sOHSS secondary to high levels of hCG. This type is probably the most frequent one. The third one is related to hypothyroidism. This classification could be useful for clinicians and scientists (see, for example, the propositions in Table 2Go of the different clinical tests that could be informative to obtain from the various classes of sOHSS patients). If such propositions are adopted, clinicians will rapidly extent our knowledge on the precise origins of sOHSS, which could result in delineation of new types of sOHSS and certainly help with future counseling and treatment of their patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Patient management propositions to extend understanding of the physiopathology of sOHSS

 
In conclusion, the absence and presence of FSHr mutations have allowed creation of a pathophysiological classification of sOHSS. They have also pointed to some clinical needs in sOHSS pregnancies, such as the repeated determination of hCG levels.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank V. Janssens for expert technical assistance. We thank Dr. A. Delbaere (Hospital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium) and all the clinicians involved in this study (cited in Table 1Go), who provided DNA from OHSS patients. We thank Dr. Ho Su-Chin from Singapore who provided ethnically matched DNA.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Belgian program on Interuniversity Poles of Attraction initiated by the Belgian State, Prime Minister’s Office, Science Policy Programming and the LifeScHealth program of the European Community (Grant LSHB-CT-2003-503337); grants from Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique Médicale, Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, Association en Recherche Biomedicale et Diagnostique, Fondation ERASME, and the Improving of Human Potential of the European Community (HPRI-CT-1999-00071); and funds from Actions de Recherche Concertées de la Communauté Française de Belgique. A.D.L. is Aspirant at the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, and S.C. is Chercheur Qualifié at the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique.

First Published Online November 8, 2005

Abbreviations: CG, Chorionic gonadotropin; FSHr, FSH receptor; hCG, human CG; OHSS, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; rh, recombinant human; sOHSS, spontaneous OHSS; TM-V, transmembrane helix 5; TSHr, TSH receptor; wt, wild type.

Received July 15, 2005.

Accepted November 2, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Dias JA, Cohen BD, Lindau-Shepard B, Nechamen CA, Peterson AJ, Schmidt A 2002 Molecular, structural, and cellular biology of follitropin and follitropin receptor. Vitam Horm 64:249–322[Medline]
  2. Ascoli M, Fanelli F, Segaloff DL 2002 The lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor, a 2002 perspective. Endocr Rev 23:141–174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Dufau ML 1998 The luteinizing hormone receptor. Annu Rev Physiol 60:461–496[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Rapoport B, Chazenbalk GD, Jaume JC, McLachlan SM 1998 The thyrotropin (TSH) receptor: interaction with TSH and autoantibodies. Endocr Rev 19:673–716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Vassart G, Pardo L, Costagliola S 2004 A molecular dissection of the glycoprotein hormone receptors. Trends Biochem Sci 29:119–126[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Hobson BM, Wide L 1981 The similarity of chorionic gonadotrophin and its subunits in term placentae from man, apes, Old and New World monkeys and a prosimian. Folia Primatol 35:51–64[Medline]
  7. Glinoer D 1997 The regulation of thyroid function in pregnancy: pathways of endocrine adaptation from physiology to pathology. Endocr Rev 18:404–433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hershman JM 1999 Human chorionic gonadotropin and the thyroid: hyperemesis gravidarum and trophoblastic tumors. Thyroid 9:653–657[Medline]
  9. Fan QR, Hendrickson WA 2005 Structure of human follicle-stimulating hormone in complex with its receptor. Nature 433:269–277[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Rodien P, Bremont C, Sanson ML, Parma J, Van Sande J, Costagliola S, Luton JP, Vassart G, Duprez L 1998 Familial gestational hyperthyroidism caused by a mutant thyrotropin receptor hypersensitive to human chorionic gonadotropin. N Engl J Med 339:1823–1826[Free Full Text]
  11. Smits G, Olatunbosun O, Delbaere A, Pierson R, Vassart G, Costagliola S 2003 Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome due to a mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor. N Engl J Med 349:760–766[Free Full Text]
  12. Vasseur C, Rodien P, Beau I, Desroches A, Gerard C, de Poncheville L, Chaplot S, Savagner F, Croue A, Mathieu E, Lahlou N, Descamps P, Misrahi M 2003 A chorionic gonadotropin-sensitive mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor as a cause of familial gestational spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. N Engl J Med 349:753–759[Free Full Text]
  13. Montanelli L, Delbaere A, Di Carlo C, Nappi C, Smits G, Vassart G, Costagliola S 2004 A Mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor as a cause of familial spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:1255–1258[Abstract]
  14. Montanelli L, Van Durme JJ, Smits G, Bonomi M, Rodien P, Devor EJ, Moffat-Wilson K, Pardo L, Vassart G, Costagliola S 2004 Modulation of ligand selectivity associated with activation of the transmembrane region of the human follitropin receptor. Mol Endocrinol 18:2061–2073[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Delbaere A, Smits G, De Leener A, Costagliola S, Vassart G 2005 Understanding ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Endocrine 26:285–289[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Chae HD, Park EJ, Kim SH, Kim CH, Kang BM, Chang YS 2001 Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome complicating a spontaneous singleton pregnancy: a case report. J Assist Reprod Genet 18:120–123[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Suzuki S 2004 Comparison between spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and hyperreactio luteinalis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 269:227–229[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Haimov-Kochman R, Yanai N, Yagel S, Amsalem H, Lavy Y, Hurwitz A 2004 Spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and hyperreactio luteinalis are entities in continuum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:675–678[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Olesen PG, Neumann GA 2005 Spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in a normal singleton pregnancy. Ugeskr Laeger 167:411–412[Medline]
  20. Saisto T, Tiitinen A, Ulander VM, Kaaja R 2004 Clinical cure of severe, early onset preeclampsia with low molecular weight heparin therapy in primigravida with hyperreactio luteinalis and thrombophilia. Hum Reprod 19:725–728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Nappi RG, Di Naro E, D’Aries AP, Nappi L 1998 Natural pregnancy in hypothyroid woman complicated by spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178:610–611[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Taher BM, Ghariabeh RA, Jarrah NS, Hadidy AM, Radaideh AM, Ajlouni KM 2004 Spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome caused by hypothyroidism in an adult. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 112:107–109[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Campbell RK, Bergert E, Wang Y, Morris JC, Moyle WR 1997 Chimeric proteins can exceed the sum of their parts: implications for evolution and protein design. Nat Biotech 15:439–443[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Schubert RL, Narayan P, Puett D 2003 Specificity of cognate ligand-receptor interactions: fusion proteins of human chorionic gonadotropin and the heptahelical receptors for human luteinizing hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone. Endocrinology 144:129–137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Smits G, Campillo M, Govaerts C, Janssens V, Richter C, Vassart G, Pardo L, Costagliola S 2003 Glycoprotein hormone receptors: determinants in leucine-rich repeats responsible for ligand specificity. EMBO J 22:2692–2703[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Vischer HF, Granneman JC, Bogerd J 2003 Opposite contribution of two ligand-selective determinants in the N-terminal hormone-binding exodomain of human gonadotropin receptors. Mol Endocrinol 17:1972–1981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Ballesteros JA, Weinstein H 1995 Integrated methods for modelling G-protein-coupled receptors. Methods Neurosci 25:366–428
  28. Li J, Edwards PC, Burghammer M, Villa C, Schertler GF 2004 Structure of bovine rhodopsin in a trigonal crystal form. J Mol Biol 343:1409–1438[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Vriend G 1990 WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J Mol Graph 8:52–56[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Krieger E, Koraimann G, Vriend G 2002 Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA–a self-parameterizing force field. Proteins 47:393–402[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Olatunbosun OA, Gilliland B, Brydon LA, Chizen DR, Pierson RA 1996 Spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in four consecutive pregnancies. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 23:127–132[Medline]
  32. Di Carlo C, Bruno P, Cirillo D, Morgera R, Pellicano M, Nappi C 1997 Increased concentrations of renin, aldosterone and Ca125 in a case of spontaneous, recurrent, familial, severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod 12:2115–2117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Delbaere A, Smits G, Olatunbosun O, Pierson R, Vassart G, Costagliola S 2004 New insights into the pathophysiology of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. What makes the difference between spontaneous and iatrogenic syndrome? Hum Reprod 19:486–489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Palczewski K, Kumasaka T, Hori T, Behnke CA, Motoshima H, Fox BA, Le Trong I, Teller DC, Okada T, Stenkamp RE, Yamamoto M, Miyano M 2000 Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G protein-coupled receptor. Science 289:739–745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Ruprecht JJ, Mielke T, Vogel R, Villa C, Schertler GF 2004 Electron crystallography reveals the structure of metarhodopsin I. EMBO J 23:3609–3620[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Esapa CT, Duprez L, Ludgate M, Mustafa MS, Kendall-Taylor P, Vassart G, Harris PE 1999 A novel thyrotropin receptor mutation in an infant with severe thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid 9:1005–1010[Medline]
  37. Laue LL, Wu SM, Kudo M, Bourdony CJ, Cutler Jr GB, Hsueh AJ, Chan WY 1996 Compound heterozygous mutations of the luteinizing hormone receptor gene in Leydig cell hypoplasia. Mol Endocrinol 10:987–997[Abstract]
  38. Shenker A 2002 Activating mutations of the lutropin choriogonadotropin receptor in precocious puberty. Receptors Channels 8:3–18[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Fanelli F 2000 Theoretical study on mutation-induced activation of the luteinizing hormone receptor. J Mol Biol 296:1333–1351[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Ludwig M, Gembruch U, Bauer O, Diedrich K 1998 Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in a spontaneous pregnancy with fetal and placental triploidy: information about the general pathophysiology of OHSS. Hum Reprod 13:2082–2087[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Royer, A. Lefevre-Minisini, G. Caltabiano, T. Lacombe, Y. Malthiery, F. Savagner, L. Pardo, and P. Rodien
The Cloned Equine Thyrotropin Receptor Is Hypersensitive to Human Chorionic Gonadotropin; Identification of Three Residues in the Extracellular Domain Involved in Ligand Specificity
Endocrinology, October 1, 2008; 149(10): 5088 - 5096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. L. Bogorad, C. Courtillot, C. Mestayer, S. Bernichtein, L. Harutyunyan, J.-B. Jomain, A. Bachelot, F. Kuttenn, P. A. Kelly, V. Goffin, et al.
Identification of a gain-of-function mutation of the prolactin receptor in women with benign breast tumors
PNAS, September 23, 2008; 105(38): 14533 - 14538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
X. Feng, T. Muller, D. Mizrachi, F. Fanelli, and D. L. Segaloff
An Intracellular Loop (IL2) Residue Confers Different Basal Constitutive Activities to the Human Lutropin Receptor and Human Thyrotropin Receptor through Structural Communication between IL2 and Helix 6, via Helix 3
Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1705 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
R. N. Edwards-Silva, C. S. Han, Y. Hoang, and L.-C. Kao
Spontaneous Ovarian Hyperstimulation in a Naturally Conceived Pregnancy With Uncontrolled Hypothyroidism
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2008; 111(2): 498 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H. Binder, R. Dittrich, I. Hager, A. Muller, S. Oeser, M. W Beckmann, M. Hamori, P. A Fasching, and R. Strick
Association of FSH receptor and CYP19A1 gene variations with sterility and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Reproduction, January 1, 2008; 135(1): 107 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Zhang, Y.-X. Tao, G. L. Ryan, X. Feng, F. Fanelli, and D. L. Segaloff
Intrinsic Differences in the Response of the Human Lutropin Receptor Versus the Human Follitropin Receptor to Activating Mutations
J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2007; 282(35): 25527 - 25539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. L. Ryan, X. Feng, C. B. d'Alva, M. Zhang, B. J. Van Voorhis, E. M. Pinto, A. E. F. Kubias, S. R. Antonini, A. C. Latronico, and D. L. Segaloff
Evaluating the Roles of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Polymorphisms in Gonadal Hyperstimulation Associated with Severe Juvenile Primary Hypothyroidism
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 2312 - 2317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Bonomi, M. Busnelli, L. Persani, G. Vassart, and S. Costagliola
Structural Differences in the Hinge Region of the Glycoprotein Hormone Receptors: Evidence from the Sulfated Tyrosine Residues
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 20(12): 3351 - 3363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. M. Allan, A. Garcia, J. Spaliviero, M. Jimenez, and D. J. Handelsman
Maintenance of Spermatogenesis by the Activated Human (Asp567Gly) FSH Receptor During Testicular Regression Due to Hormonal Withdrawal
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2006; 74(5): 938 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/2/555    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Leener, A.
Right arrow Articles by Costagliola, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Leener, A.
Right arrow Articles by Costagliola, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*OMIM*Protein
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals