help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM ENDO 08
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2005-1542
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/2/371    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isidori, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Besser, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isidori, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Besser, G. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 2 371-377
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society


EXTENSIVE CLINICAL EXPERIENCE

The Ectopic Adrenocorticotropin Syndrome: Clinical Features, Diagnosis, Management, and Long-Term Follow-Up

Andrea M. Isidori, Gregory A. Kaltsas, Carlotta Pozza, Vanni Frajese, John Newell-Price, Rodney H. Reznek, Paul J. Jenkins, John P. Monson, Ashley B. Grossman and G. Michael Besser

Departments of Endocrinology (A.M.I., G.A.K., C.P., V.F., P.J.J., J.P.M., A.B.G., G.M.B.) and Academic Radiology (R.H.R.), St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom; and Department of Endocrinology (J.N.-P.), Division of Clinical Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S5 7AU, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Professor A. B. Grossman, Department of Endocrinology, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom. E-mail: a.b.grossman{at}qmul.ac.uk.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: There are few large series of patients with ectopic, nonpituitary, corticotropin (ACTH) secretion (EAS).

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical, biochemical, and radiological features, management, and treatment outcome of patients with EAS.

Design: This was a retrospective case-record study.

Setting: The setting for this study was a tertiary referral hospital center.

Patients: Forty patients with EAS were studied.

Main Outcome Measures: Clinical, biochemical, and radiological features and response to therapy and survival were measured.

Results: The median follow-up was 5 yr (range, 2–30 yr). None of the dynamic tests achieved 100% accuracy, but bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling showed an absent central gradient in all but one case (one of 12). Imaging correctly identified the lesion at first investigation in 65% of cases. Bronchial carcinoid tumors were the most common cause of EAS (n = 12; 30%), followed by other neuroendocrine tumors (n = 13, 32.5%). In 12.5% of patients, the source of EAS was never found. Octreotide scintigraphy and whole-body venous sampling were of limited value. Surgical attempt at curative resection was successful in 83% (10 of 12) of patients with bronchial carcinoid tumors; others responded generally well to adrenolytic therapy or bilateral adrenalectomy. Tumor histology and the presence of distant metastases were the main predictors of overall survival (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: A variety of tests and imaging studies are necessary for the correct diagnosis of the EAS, but even then, up to 20% of cases present a covert or occult EAS syndrome. These cases require a prolonged follow-up, review, and repetition of diagnostic tests and scans.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CUSHING’S SYNDROME (CS) results from autonomous and/or excessive glucocorticoid secretion and is usually associated with a distinct clinical phenotype (1, 2). In most cases, CS is ACTH-dependent, originating either from a pituitary ACTH-secreting tumor [Cushing’s disease (CD)] or, less frequently, from nonpituitary tumors secreting ACTH, ectopic ACTH secretion (EAS) (1, 2, 3). EAS may be associated with either highly malignant tumors or with a variety of less aggressive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) exhibiting typical symptoms and signs of CS. Because selective removal of the source of ACTH secretion is associated with a high probability of cure in cases of CD and most of EAS, it is crucial to distinguish EAS from the much more common CD (4, 5).

With the development of improved biochemical and imaging techniques, EAS is being recognized more frequently, and several reports have described the features of EAS as opposed to CD (6, 7, 8, 9, 10). However, most of these studies included a relatively small number of patients with EAS, originating from different institutions with considerable variability in investigational protocols and assays (9, 10); only two large series have to date been published in detail (11, 12), both from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

We have therefore analyzed the clinical, biochemical, and radiological features in all patients with EAS who presented with symptoms and signs of CS; the distinct feature of the present analysis is that all patients were investigated on the basis of an established investigational protocol, updated as novel diagnostic techniques became available, and were treated and followed up in the same unit, thus minimizing the effects that differences in data accrual, investigational and analytical methods, and therapeutic options might produce.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

All cases were drawn from those entered in the St. Bartholomew’s Hospital Cushing’s database in the years 1969–2001: 318 patients were classified as having ACTH-dependent CS; 274 had CD, and 44 had EAS. However, full records and a minimum follow-up of 2 yr were available for only 40 of the 44 patients with EAS. Patients with small-cell carcinomas (SCCs) were included in the analysis only when the major presenting complaints were related to symptoms and signs of CS. The study was approved as an institutional case-note review. Data on some of the included patients have been presented partially in previous publications (4, 13, 14, 15).

Diagnosis of CS

The diagnosis of CS was based on clinical features associated with hypercortisolemia, an elevated midnight sleeping cortisol level, and lack of suppression of serum cortisol after an oral 2-mg/d 48-h low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (2, 16). After the diagnosis of ACTH-dependent CS was made, the following tests were used to distinguish patients with EAS from patients with CD: 1) the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test (HDDST) (2 mg of dexamethasone every 6 h for 48 h) (15); 2) the human CRH test (two patients had ovine sequence CRH) and/or desmopressin test (13, 14); 3) bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) with estimation of the ACTH ratio between the IPS and the periphery (IPS/P) before and after CRH stimulation, from 1984 onward (4); and 4) measurement of urinary 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid, urinary catecholamines, plasma calcitonin, fasting plasma gut peptides (gastrin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, pancreatic polypeptide, glucagon, somatostatin, and neurotensin), serum {alpha}-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, serum PTH, and serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-HCG) (15).

Radiological investigation

All patients had a chest radiograph (CXR) performed. Imaging varied according to availability and advances in techniques; a computerized tomography (CT) scan of the chest and upper abdomen was used. Following the availability of magnetic resonance, imaging of the pituitary, abdomen, and/or the pelvis was also obtained. When the source of ACTH secretion was not evident after radiological investigation, whole-body venous catheterization and sampling (WBCS) was performed in attempt to localize the ectopic source (from 1970 onward) (16). From 1990 onward, whole-body radionuclide imaging, initially with 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) (n = 6) and later with 111In-octreotide (n = 8), was also available. In patients in whom no source of the EAS was found on routine imaging, repeated diagnostic scans were performed every 6–12 months.

Preoperative management

Correction of the hypercortisolemia was attempted using adrenolytic medication. Patients with a diagnosis other than SCC were considered for surgical resection (n = 20), either curative or cytoreductive (17). To minimize surgical complications, control of the hypercortisolemia was always attempted preoperatively.

Definitive diagnosis of EAS and definition of overt, covert, and occult EAS

A confirmed diagnosis of EAS was made on the basis of histological confirmation on tissue obtained either from primary lesions or metastases during surgical removal or diagnostic biopsies or autopsy specimens (n = 35). In all patients, the diagnosis was further confirmed by positive ACTH immunoreactivity (n = 15) and/or complete/partial resolution of the hypercortisolemia after tumor removal/debulking (n = 19). One patient had repeated investigations over a period of 6 yr, which failed to locate an ectopic source, and she also failed to respond to total hypophysectomy. She died suddenly of pulmonary collapse, and a mesothelioma was found at autopsy, but ACTH immunohistochemistry was unavailable. In five patients, no tumor was ever found; however, long-term follow-up with repeated pituitary imaging and dynamic testing of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, including BIPSS, were highly suggestive of EAS, and these patients underwent bilateral adrenalectomy. None of these patients developed Nelson’s syndrome or a pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormality (18). This patient group will now be defined as having occult ACTH secretion. All patients with confirmed tumor histology were divided into two groups: 1) patients presenting with hypercortisolemia with the tumoral source being detected after initial endocrine and radiological investigations were defined as having overt EAS (n = 26), and 2) patients presenting with hypercortisolemia in whom no tumor was detected at initial investigation but which became evident on subsequent evaluation were defined as having covert EAS (n = 9). These two groups were systematically compared.

Assays and investigations

All assay measurements and radiological investigations were performed at St. Bartholomew’s Hospital. The assays, techniques, and interpretations of the investigational procedures have been described previously (4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20).

Statistical analysis

In the differential diagnosis, the presence of EAS was considered to be a positive response (disease). This included the BIPSS, where a lack of a central gradient was taken as a positive response in terms of the diagnosis of EAS. Descriptive statistics are presented as median values accompanied by the 25th–75th percentile ranges, if not otherwise stated. Nonparametric tests were used for comparisons between groups. Correlation was estimated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Significance was taken as P < 0.05. All analyses were carried out using Stata Statistical Software (Stata Corp., College Station, TX).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Forty patients with the EAS [19 males; female to male ratio, 1:1; mean age, 45.9 ± 15.3 (SD) yr; range 15–80 yr] were studied. Twenty-one (52.5%) patients had a NET (12 bronchial, three pancreatic, two thymic, two lymph nodes with unknown primary, and two disseminated NETs), three (7.5%) had a medullary carcinoma of the thyroid (MTC), one (2.5%) had a pheochromocytoma, one (2.5%) had mesothelioma, and nine (22.5%) had SCCs [seven small-cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs) and two small-cell colorectal carcinomas]. As noted above, in five (12.5%) patients, the source of putative EAS was not found (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Characteristics of the pathology of all EAS

 
Clinical and biochemical features

The majority of patients presented with classical signs and symptoms of CS (Table 2Go). Among the 40 patients, signs considered to be highly suggestive of CS such as proximal myopathy, thinning of the skin, and bruising were noticed in 62.5, 60, and 50% of patients, respectively (2). When the clinical features of patients with SCC were compared with those with other sources, major differences were found for the degree of hypokalemia (2.4 vs. 2.9 mmol/liter), skin pigmentation [six of nine (67%) vs. five of 26 (19%)], ankle edema [six of nine (67%) vs. 11 of 26 (27%)], and psychiatric disorders [two of nine (22%) vs. 17 of 26 (65%)]. Important differences were found in the rapidity of onset of symptoms and in time to diagnosis between SCC and the other sources (Table 2Go). When patients with overt and covert EAS were compared, no significant differences in clinical symptoms or signs, nor in hormonal or biochemical characteristics, were found (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Clinical, hormonal, and biochemical characteristics of all the patients with histologically proven EAS (n = 35) according to the type of the tumor or the clinical presentation

 
Overall, elevated arterial blood pressure was found in 24 (60%), diabetes mellitus in 15 (37.5%), and hypokalemia in 70%; 12 patients were anemic (hemoglobin < 11.1 g/dl), and one was polycythemic (hemoglobin = 17.6 g/dl, normal < 16.6).

In four patients, cortisol levels fluctuated markedly during follow-up, suggesting the presence of a cyclical CS (2).

Diagnosis of CS

All patients had 0900 h plasma ACTH levels (mean, 358.03 ng/liter; median, 164 ng/liter; 96.2–374.5 ng/liter) and serum cortisol [mean, 63.0 µg/dl; median, 47.5 µg/dl; 36.2–72.4 µg/dl (1739 and 1310 nmol/liter; 1000–2000 nmol/liter)] levels above the normal reference range; none showed a midnight cortisol less than 1.7 µg/dl (<50 nmol/liter) or suppression to the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test.

Differential diagnosis of CS

Overall, 32 patients underwent a HDDST; 29 of 32 (91%) showed no serum cortisol suppression after the HDDST, defined as a more than 50% suppression of the baseline value. Three patients with histologically proven EAS showed more than 50% cortisol suppression after the HDDST (sensitivity, 91%), but only one, according to our redefined criterion (20), of a more than 60% suppression (sensitivity, 97%). Data on the CRH stimulation test were available for 18 patients: 17 (94%) exhibited no cortisol or ACTH response (13, 21) after CRH administration; however, one patient with a bronchial carcinoid tumor demonstrated a cortisol rise from 20.6 µg/dl (568 nmol/liter) at baseline to a peak of 26.2 µg/dl (722 nmol/liter) at 45 min. The results on the combination of the diagnostic criteria on suppression and stimulation tests in the differential diagnosis of CS have been reported recently (20).

Tumor markers other than ACTH

The levels of one or more tumor markers were elevated in 22 patients with EAS. Plasma calcitonin was the most commonly elevated tumor marker observed in 11 patients (median, 1.14 µg/liter; 25th–75th, 0.31–24.5; reference range, <0.08 µg/liter), including two of three of patients with MTCs. Plasma gastrin was elevated in 11 patients, including seven with islet cell tumors. Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid was elevated only in two of 20 patients with NETs not associated with a carcinoid syndrome. Plasma glucagon was elevated in three patients with islet cell tumors. Plasma somatostatin was elevated in two patients with MTC and SCLC. Other markers were only sporadically elevated.

BIPSS

Twelve patients underwent BIPSS, eight with associated CRH stimulation; 11 of 12 patients demonstrated a less than 2:1 (basal) or less than 3:1 (stimulated) central to peripheral ACTH gradient (actual < 1.8), whereas a single patient (with a mesothelioma) had a more than 3 gradient (basal, 2.8; and post-CRH, 13.1). The single patient who exhibited a positive response to peripheral CRH administration and who also suppressed by more than 60% during the HDDST (false-positive result) showed no significant basal or stimulated central to peripheral gradient. None of the patients with an undiagnosed source of ACTH secretion, occult EAS, showed a positive gradient on the BIPSS.

WBCS

Twenty-two patients in whom the diagnosis was still not evident after basic imaging underwent WBCS (16). This identified the source of EAS in four cases (two thymic carcinoids, one mediastinal lymph node, and one MTC). This test was performed in 11 patients in which the standard radiological investigations had failed to localize the source of ACTH and in a further 11 patients as confirmation of suspected lesions seen on imaging. Three of these four patients were investigated before the introduction of CT scanning, and one in 1983 when CT imaging was generally of very low resolution.

Radiological investigation

A variety of imaging procedures were performed in an attempt to localize the ACTH-producing tumor, and these varied over time as different imaging modalities became available (Fig. 1Go). A plain chest radiograph revealed the presence of a tumor in five of 12 patients with bronchial carcinoids and in five of seven patients with SCLC. CT scanning of the chest correctly identified the lesion in two of four patients with lung tumors, in two of two patients with MTC, and in 10 of 12 patients with bronchial carcinoid tumors; four of these patients had an 111In-octreotide scan that did not reveal any pathological uptake. Two of 12 patients with bronchial carcinoid tumors had an 123I-MIBG scan that did not reveal the primary in either but did reveal the presence of metastases (liver and eyes) in one patient.


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Localization flow-chart of all patients with EAS.

 
CT scanning of the abdomen revealed the presence of lesions in two of three patients with pancreatic islet cell tumors and in the single patient with a pheochromocytoma. CT scanning of the abdomen failed to identify one of two patients with small-cell colorectal carcinomas, subsequently diagnosed by colonoscopy and 111In-octreotide scanning. Thyroid ultrasound correctly identified three of three MTCs. Initial imaging with a combination of plain radiology, CT, MRI, and ultrasound succeeded in localizing the ACTH-secreting tumor in 23 of 28 patients (10 of 12 lung carcinoids, two of three pancreatic islet cell tumors, six of seven SCLC, three of three MTC, the single pheochromocytoma, and in one of two SCC colonic tumors). In the remaining 12 patients, these investigations were either negative or could only identify metastases. In summary, of 40 patients, 28 had CT imaging, which identified 23 of 28 tumors. The smallest tumor imaged was a bronchial carcinoid that was found on a follow-up (repeated) CT scan of the chest of a patient with covert EAS. The lesion was described as 0.9 cm by the radiologist and 0.8 cm by the pathologist (patient 2 in Table 3Go). The size of the other tumors is reported in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Features of the nine patients with covert EAS

 
111In-octreotide scanning was performed in eight patients; in one patient, it confirmed the MTC, and in one patient, it diagnosed a rectal carcinoma that had already been detected by digital rectal examination; in four patients with confirmed NETs, the results were negative, as they were in two patients with SCLCs.

Overall, 15 of 40 patients underwent MRI of the pituitary gland, but in no case did it show any clear evidence of an adenoma at presentation or follow-up.

Management and follow-up

To obtain rapid control of the hypercortisolemia in patients with SCCs, treatment was initiated with metyrapone and followed by ketoconazole and/or mitotane; control of hypercortisolemia was usually obtained within 2 wk. In total, 28 patients received steroidogenesis inhibitors for periods of 4 wk to 96 months (median, 9 months). One patient required iv treatment with etomidate to control the hypercortisolemia (22). In general, eucortisolism was obtained in all patients without any major adverse effects necessitating discontinuation of the treatment.

Curative surgery and tumor debulking were performed whenever possible. Overall, 12 patients had a single primary lesion and underwent an attempt at curative resection; 83% (10 of 12) of patients with NETs had a complete and 17% a partial remission of the hypercortisolemia and 50% recovered their pituitary-adrenal axis within 1 month, whereas the rest continued on replacement therapy for a median of 5 yr (range, 2–7 yr). Bilateral adrenalectomy was performed in 12 patients (nine of 12 disseminated, three of five occult) at an average of 39 ± 39 (mean ± SD) months from presentation. As additional therapy, 14 of 40 received external radiotherapy to the mediastinum and 11 of 40 patients received appropriate chemotherapy, whereas two patients with NETs received 131I-MIBG therapy.

At the last follow-up visit, 15 of 40 patients, all with NETs, were alive. Patients with aggressive tumors died of complications due to the tumor itself or as a consequence of previous excessive cortisol secretion (pancreatitis, peritonitis with perforation, opportunistic infection, cardiac failure). The median duration of follow-up was 60 months: 12 of 40 patients obtained complete remission, whereas two showed partial remission; both these patients are still alive. Figure 2Go shows the survival curves for all patients. Survival analysis revealed that tumor histology and, in the subgroup of NETs, the presence of nonlymph node metastases, were the most important prognostic factors predicting overall survival (P < 0.05). In five of 40 patients, the tumor remained occult (two of these patients died at 13 and 45 months; no autopsy available), whereas the other three are still alive (72, 192, and 204 months of follow-up, respectively).


Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, according to the histology and stage of the tumor.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study presents the clinical, endocrinological, and radiological features of a significant cohort of 40 patients with the EAS evaluated and treated with a uniform protocol within a single institution, demonstrating the inherent difficulties and pitfalls in the diagnosis, localization, and management of these tumors. The major conclusions can be summarized as follows: 1) EAS is associated with a variety of endocrine and nonendocrine tumors; 2) no single test is accurate enough to distinguish the ectopic from the pituitary sources of ACTH; 3) similarly, no single imaging modality can itself identify and localize every tumor responsible for EAS. However, there have been considerable technical improvements in imaging, especially CT, and positive findings in association with a negative petrosal sinus catheter have been very useful, whereas WBCS has been less rewarding; 5) radionuclide imaging has not, in our experience, been helpful in discovering otherwise unsuspected lesions; 6) management of patients with EAS requires a major effort to control hypercortisolemia as soon as the diagnosis is established; 7) survival analysis revealed that the prognosis in patients with SCCs is poor, whereas in NETs it can be excellent, and the presence of secondary deposits is the major factor affecting life expectancy; and 8) bilateral adrenalectomy remains an alternative to long-term adrenolytic medication in patients with disseminated tumors.

In our series, the lung still remains the major organ harboring an ectopic ACTH-secreting tumor (47.5%), with the majority of cases being bronchial carcinoid tumors (30%) followed by SCLCs (17.5%). Bronchial carcinoid tumors exhibit malignant potential and may share common histological features with SCLC, thus representing part of a tumor spectrum (23). We believe that control of the excess cortisol burden represents an important part of their management (11, 24, 25). We found that there is still a significant minority of patients (12.5% in our group) in whom the source of EAS cannot be found even after repeated evaluation and prolonged follow-up. However, this number is less than that reported in other series, probably reflecting the improvement in imaging modalities and prolonged follow-up (9, 10, 12). In such patients, a false-negative BIPSS remains a possibility; however, in two of five, pituitary exploration was performed, and no abnormality was found; the elevated tumor markers and the consistency of the other dynamic tests all pointed toward an ectopic source of ACTH (26).

The recorded clinical features of patients with EAS in this series were broad, resembling those found in patients with CD even in some patients with SCLC (9, 10). No major differences were found between patients with overt or covert EAS, suggesting that tumor mass does not necessarily predict the secretory characteristics of the tumor or the clinical features of the syndrome.

Although patients with the EAS tend to have higher ACTH levels than patients with CD, there is no clear distinction between these two entities (Table 2Go). We have also recently reported very high ACTH levels in a cohort of patients with pituitary macroadenomas, whose clinical and biochemical features to some extent mimicked those of the EAS (21). No statistically significant difference was found between patients with covert or overt EAS. These data are in contrast with previous publications showing some discriminatory value of baseline ACTH (9, 27) but are consistent with the recent large NIH series (12).

Several tests have been proposed to establish the differential diagnosis of CS. In this study, only 3.1 and 5.5% of patients with EAS obtained a response to the HDDST (using serum cortisol percentage change from baseline) and the CRH test, respectively. Thus, although each test on its own may be of relatively limited diagnostic accuracy, a lack of response to both tests has a very high, albeit not perfect, sensitivity for the diagnosis of EAS. A single patient showed responsivity to both tests but no BIPSS gradient, whereas a second single patient showed an apparent central gradient on BIPSS (false-negative) but absent responsivity to dynamic testing, although it still remains possible that despite all investigations, this patient with a mesothelioma had CD (however, total hypophysectomy had not been curative). Thus, although a false-negative BIPSS for EAS is rare, it does occur (26, 28). Our previously published analysis that included 209 patients with CD showed a 93–97% specificity for the various combinations of the two tests (20), confirming the high diagnostic accuracy of this approach. Indeed, we (20) and others before us (29, 30) found that most patients with CD who failed to respond to the CRH showed an adequate suppression to dexamethasone. Overall, these percentages are slightly higher than figures reported by others (7, 9, 12, 15, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37), we believe that at least in part reflect the higher reliability of the formal 2-d dexamethasone suppression tests for serum cortisol (rather than urinary steroids or the overnight test) (2) and the use of revised response criteria (20). Unfortunately, criteria defined in the referral centers often do not perform with the same accuracy when applied in nonspecialized centers and therefore should be interpreted with caution.

Modern cross-sectional imaging techniques revealed the primary lesion in most patients, and even when tumors were covert, repeated imaging was usually ultimately successful (Table 3Go). State-of-the-art multidetector CT allows the acquisition of eight, 16, or 24 slices in 1 sec. Our current protocol in this situation is to scan from the lung apices to the iliac crests in 2.5-mm intervals after iv injection of contrast medium. MRI was helpful in resolving equivocal CT findings or where the CT was negative and a high index of suspicion persisted for an ectopic source, particularly within the abdomen. MRI is of little value to identify small bronchial carcinoids, but it may be of value in imaging the mediastinum and thymic lesions. In the abdomen, we have found it to be as sensitive, and on occasion even more sensitive, than CT in identifying small pancreatic islet cell tumors. When scanning the pancreas, our own experience shows that a fat-suppressed gradient echo T1w sequence is the most helpful; in looking at the mediastinum, spin echo or gradient axial and coronal T1w and T2w sequences are usually required. In agreement with the recent large NIH series (12), both WBCS studies and 111In-octreotide scintigraphy were generally unhelpful.

After the localization of the lesion responsible for EAS, the optimal management is surgical excision; all these patients were treated with adrenolytic medication and, if necessary, bilateral adrenalectomy. Survival analysis revealed that the prognosis of patients with EAS is correlated with the tumor histology. Patients with SCC had the worst prognosis, whereas patients with other tumors, especially bronchial carcinoid tumors, often showed prolonged survival. Patients with an occult source of ACTH but adequate control of hypercortisolemia also had a good prognosis. The follow-up of the present study is probably the longest available on patients with EAS. Interestingly, tumor types and sizes, responses to biochemical tests, relapses, and survival rates are nearly identical with those reviewed by Ilias et al. (12) at the NIH, the largest published series, indicating a substantial continuity between the American and European series.

In summary, the findings of this study reveal that bronchial carcinoid tumors constitute the most common cause of the EAS mostly presenting with classical symptoms/signs of CS. Basal investigations exhibit a considerable overlap with those of CD, but BIPSS was only falsely suggestive of CD in a single patient with the EAS. Although in the past imaging modalities often failed to localize small carcinoid tumors, modern diagnostics in expert hands are highly accurate. Where the source defies optimal imaging, interval adrenolytic therapy with later reinvestigation is recommended.


    Footnotes
 
Present address for A.M.I.: Dipt. di Fisiopatologia Medica, Università di Roma, "La Sapienza," Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.

First Published Online November 22, 2005

Abbreviations: BIPSS, Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling; CS, Cushing’s syndrome; CT, computerized tomography; CXR, chest radiograph; EAS, ectopic ACTH secretion; HDDST, high-dose dexamethasone suppression test; 123I-MIBG, 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MTC, medullary carcinoma of the thyroid; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; SCC, small-cell carcinoma; SCLC, small-cell lung carcinoma; WBCS, whole-body venous catheterization and sampling.

Received July 12, 2005.

Accepted November 9, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Newell-Price J, Grossman A 1999 Diagnosis and management of Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet 353:2087–2088[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Newell-Price J, Trainer P, Besser M, Grossman A 1998 The diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome and pseudo-Cushing’s states. Endocr Rev 19:647–672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Findling JW, Raff H 2001 Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 30:729–747[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Kaltsas GA, Giannulis MG, Newell-Price JD, Dacie JE, Thakkar C, Afshar F, Monson JP, Grossman AB, Besser GM, Trainer PJ 1999 A critical analysis of the value of simultaneous inferior petrosal sinus sampling in Cushing’s disease and the occult ectopic adrenocorticotropin syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:487–492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Raff H, Findling JW 2003 A physiologic approach to diagnosis of the Cushing syndrome. Ann Intern Med 138:980–991[Free Full Text]
  6. Findling JW, Tyrrell JB 1986 Occult ectopic secretion of corticotropin. Arch Intern Med 146:929–933[Abstract]
  7. Limper AH, Carpenter PC, Scheithauer B, Staats BA 1992 The Cushing syndrome induced by bronchial carcinoid tumors. Ann Intern Med 117:209–214
  8. Oldfield EH, Doppman JL, Nieman LK, Chrousos GP, Miller DL, Katz DA, Cutler Jr GB, Loriaux DL 1991 Petrosal sinus sampling with and without corticotropin-releasing hormone for the differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 325:897–905[Abstract]
  9. Wajchenberg BL, Mendonca BB, Liberman B, Pereira MA, Carneiro PC, Wakamatsu A, Kirschner MA 1994 Ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome. Endocr Rev 15:752–787[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Beuschlein F, Hammer GD 2002 Ectopic pro-opiomelanocortin syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 31:191–234[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Sarlis NJ, Chanock SJ, Nieman LK 2000 Cortisolemic indices predict severe infections in Cushing syndrome due to ectopic production of adrenocorticotropin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:42–47[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ilias I, Torpy DJ, Pacak K, Mullen N, Wesley RA, Nieman LK 2005 Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic corticotropin secretion: twenty years’ experience at the National Institutes of Health. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:4955–4962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Newell-Price J, Morris DG, Drake WM, Korbonits M, Monson JP, Besser GM, Grossman AB 2002 Optimal response criteria for the human CRH test in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1640–1645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Newell-Price J, Perry L, Medbak S, Monson J, Savage M, Besser M, Grossman A 1997 A combined test using desmopressin and corticotropin-releasing hormone in the differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:176–181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Howlett TA, Drury PL, Perry L, Doniach I, Rees LH, Besser GM 1986 Diagnosis and management of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome: comparison of the features in ectopic and pituitary ACTH production. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 24:699–713[Medline]
  16. Trainer PJ, Besser GM, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital 1995 The Bart’s endocrine protocols. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone
  17. Kaltsas GA, Besser GM, Grossman AB 2004 The diagnosis and medical management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr Rev 25:458–511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kelly PA, Samandouras G, Grossman AB, Afshar F, Besser GM, Jenkins PJ 2002 Neurosurgical treatment of Nelson’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:5465–5469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Newell-Price J, Trainer P, Perry L, Wass J, Grossman A, Besser M 1995 A single sleeping midnight cortisol has 100% sensitivity for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 43:545–550[Medline]
  20. Isidori AM, Kaltsas GA, Mohammed S, Morris DG, Jenkins P, Chew SL, Monson JP, Besser GM, Grossman AB 2003 Discriminatory value of the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test in establishing the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:5299–5306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Woo SY, Isidori AM, Wat WZ, Kaltsas GA, Afshar F, Sabin I, Jenkins P, Monson JP, Besser GM, Grossman AB 2005 The clinical and biochemical characteristics of ACTH-secreting macroadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:4963–4969[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Drake WM, Perry LA, Hinds CJ, Lowe DG, Reznek RH, Besser GM 1998 Emergency and prolonged use of intravenous etomidate to control hypercortisolemia in a patient with Cushing’s syndrome and peritonitis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3542–3544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Warren WH, Faber LP, Gould VE 1989 Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung. A clinicopathologic update. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 98:321–332[Abstract]
  24. Graham BS, Tucker Jr WS 1984 Opportunistic infections in endogenous Cushing’s syndrome. Ann Intern Med 101:334–338
  25. Dimopoulos MA, Fernandez JF, Samaan NA, Holoye PY, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R 1992 Paraneoplastic Cushing’s syndrome as an adverse prognostic factor in patients who die early with small cell lung cancer. Cancer 69:66–71[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Swearingen B, Katznelson L, Miller K, Grinspoon S, Waltman A, Dorer DJ, Klibanski A, Biller BM 2004 Diagnostic errors after inferior petrosal sinus sampling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:3752–3763[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kuhn JM, Proeschel MF, Seurin DJ, Bertagna XY, Luton JP, Girard FL 1989 Comparative assessment of ACTH and lipotropin plasma levels in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with Cushing’s syndrome: a study of 210 cases. Am J Med 86:678–684[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Yamamoto Y, Davis DH, Nippoldt TB, Young Jr WF, Huston J, III, Parisi JE 1995 False-positive inferior petrosal sinus sampling in the diagnosis of Cushing’s disease. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 83:1087–1091[Medline]
  29. Hermus AR, Pieters GF, Pesman GJ, Smals AG, Benraad TJ, Kloppenborg PW 1986 The corticotropin-releasing-hormone test versus the high-dose dexamethasone test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet 2:540–544[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Nieman LK, Chrousos GP, Oldfield EH, Avgerinos PC, Cutler Jr GB, Loriaux DL 1986 The ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation test and the dexamethasone suppression test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. Ann Intern Med 105:862–867
  31. Aron DC, Raff H, Findling JW 1997 Effectiveness versus efficacy: the limited value in clinical practice of high dose dexamethasone suppression testing in the differential diagnosis of adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1780–1785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Flack MR, Oldfield EH, Cutler GB, Zweig MH, Malley JD, Chrousos GP, Loriaux DL, Nieman LK 1992 Urine free cortisol in the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test for the differential diagnosis of the Cushing syndrome. Ann Intern Med 116:211–217
  33. Invitti C, Giraldi FP, de Martin M, Cavagnini F 1999 Diagnosis and management of Cushing’s syndrome: results of an Italian multicentre study. Study Group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology on the Pathophysiology of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:440–448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Liddle GW, Nicholson WE, Island DP, Orth DN, Abe K, Lowder SC 1969 Clinical and laboratory studies of ectopic humoral syndromes. Recent Prog Horm Res 25:283–314
  35. Reimondo G, Paccotti P, Minetto M, Termine A, Stura G, Bergui M, Angeli A, Terzolo M 2003 The corticotrophin-releasing hormone test is the most reliable noninvasive method to differentiate pituitary from ectopic ACTH secretion in Cushing’s syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 58:718–724[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Tyrrell JB, Findling JW, Aron DC, Fitzgerald PA, Forsham PH 1986 An overnight high-dose dexamethasone suppression test for rapid differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. Ann Intern Med 104:180–186
  37. Kaye TB, Crapo L 1990 The Cushing syndrome: an update on diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 112:434–444



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
J R Meinardi, B H R Wolffenbuttel, and R P F Dullaart
Cyclic Cushing's syndrome: a clinical challenge
Eur. J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 157(3): 245 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
L. R. Salgado, M. C. B V. Fragoso, M. Knoepfelmacher, M. C. Machado, S. Domenice, M. A. A. Pereira, and B. B. de Mendonca
Ectopic ACTH syndrome: our experience with 25 cases.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 155(5): 725 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. W. Findling and H. Raff
Cushing's Syndrome: Important Issues in Diagnosis and Management
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3746 - 3753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R.T. Netea-Maier, W.-A. Nieuwlaat, C.G.J. Sweep, P. Wesseling, L. Massuger, and A.R.M.M. Hermus
Virilization due to ovarian androgen hypersecretion in a patient with ectopic adrenocorticotrophic hormone secretion caused by a carcinoid tumour: Case Report
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2601 - 2605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
M. B. C C. Neto, M. C. Machado, F. Mesquita, N. R. de Castro Musolino, A. C. Toscanini, G. Ochman, V. A. S Cescato, R. Marino Jr, and M. J. Teixeira
Thymus hyperplasia after resolution of hypercortisolism in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome: the importance of thymic vein catheterization.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 154(6): 807 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/2/371    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isidori, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Besser, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isidori, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Besser, G. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals