help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1009
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herman, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herman, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 11 4612-4619
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Effect of Single Oral Doses of Sitagliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, on Incretin and Plasma Glucose Levels after an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Gary A. Herman, Arthur Bergman, Catherine Stevens, Paul Kotey, Bingming Yi, Peng Zhao, Bruno Dietrich, George Golor, Andreas Schrodter, Bart Keymeulen, Kenneth C. Lasseter, Mark S. Kipnes, Karen Snyder, Deborah Hilliard, Michael Tanen, Caroline Cilissen, Marina De Smet, Inge de Lepeleire, Kristien Van Dyck, Amy Q. Wang, Wei Zeng, Michael J. Davies, Wesley Tanaka, Jens J. Holst, Carolyn F. Deacon, Keith M. Gottesdiener and John A. Wagner

Merck Research Laboratories (G.A.H., A.B., C.S., P.K., B.Y., P.Z., K.S., D.H., M.T., A.Q.W., W.Z., M.J.D., W.T., K.M.G., J.A.W.), Rahway, New Jersey 07065; 3ClinicalResearch AG (B.D., G.G.), 16761 Berlin, Germany; Focus Clinical Drug Development GmBH (A.S.), 41460 Neuss, Germany; Free University of Brussels (B.K.), Brussels, 1050 Belgium; Clinical Pharmacology Associates (K.C.L.), Miami, Florida 33142; Diabetes and Glandular Disease Research Associates (M.S.K.), San Antonio, Texas 78229; MSD-Europe (C.C., M.D.S., I.d.L., K.V.D.), 1180 Brussels, Belgium; and University of Copenhagen (J.J.H., C.F.D.), DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Gary A. Herman, M.D., Merck Research Laboratories, Experimental Medicine, RY34-A4031, 126 East Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, New Jersey 07065. E-mail: gary_herman{at}merck.com.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: In response to a meal, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) are released and modulate glycemic control. Normally these incretins are rapidly degraded by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4). DPP-4 inhibitors are a novel class of oral antihyperglycemic agents in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The degree of DPP-4 inhibition and the level of active incretin augmentation required for glucose lowering efficacy after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were evaluated.

Objective: The objective of the study was to examine the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of sitagliptin.

Design: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period, single-dose crossover study.

Setting: The study was conducted at six investigational sites.

Patients: The study population consisted of 58 patients with type 2 diabetes who were not on antihyperglycemic agents.

Interventions: Interventions included sitagliptin 25 mg, sitagliptin 200 mg, or placebo.

Main Outcome Measures: Measurements included plasma DPP-4 activity; post-OGTT glucose excursion; active and total incretin GIP levels; insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon concentrations; and sitagliptin pharmacokinetics.

Results: Sitagliptin dose-dependently inhibited plasma DPP-4 activity over 24 h, enhanced active GLP-1 and GIP levels, increased insulin/C-peptide, decreased glucagon, and reduced glycemic excursion after OGTTs administered at 2 and 24 h after single oral 25- or 200-mg doses of sitagliptin. Sitagliptin was generally well tolerated, with no hypoglycemic events.

Conclusions: In this study in patients with type 2 diabetes, near maximal glucose-lowering efficacy of sitagliptin after single oral doses was associated with inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity of 80% or greater, corresponding to a plasma sitagliptin concentration of 100 nM or greater, and an augmentation of active GLP-1 and GIP levels of 2-fold or higher after an OGTT.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors represent a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (1). These agents work by inhibiting the DPP-4 enzyme that degrades incretin hormones such as glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), thereby stabilizing the intact (active) form of the hormones (2). Active GLP-1 and GIP stimulate glucose-dependent insulin biosynthesis and release, and GLP-1 also suppresses glucagon release, delays gastric emptying, and increases satiety (3). DPP-4 inhibitors improved glycemic control, insulin secretion, and ß-cell function in rodents (4, 5, 6). In patients with type 2 diabetes, chronic treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors decreased postprandial glucose excursion, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and was well tolerated with neutral weight effects and a low incidence of hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal adverse events relative to placebo (7, 8, 9).

Sitagliptin is an oral and highly selective DPP-4 inhibitor (10). In sitagliptin-treated lean rodents, approximately 80% inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity and 2- to 3-fold elevation in active GLP-1 levels were associated with near maximal reduction in glucose excursion after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (10). In healthy men with normal glucose concentrations, single doses of sitagliptin up to 600 mg were well tolerated without increased incidence of hypoglycemia or gastrointestinal adverse experiences, compared with placebo (11). Additionally, sitagliptin inhibited plasma DPP-4 enzyme activity and augmented active GLP-1 levels in a dose-dependent manner and had a pharmacokinetic (PK) profile consistent with once-daily dosing (11).

The degree of DPP-4 inhibition and level of active incretin augmentation required for near-maximal glucose lowering efficacy with a DPP4 inhibitor are not known. Therefore, the pharmacodynamics (PD), PK, and tolerability of sitagliptin were examined after administration of single oral doses of sitagliptin (25 or 200 mg) and OGTTs in patients with type 2 diabetes.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

The protocol was reviewed and approved by each study center. All patients provided written informed consent before enrollment. Eligible patients (age 21–60 yr) had type 2 diabetes and met all of the following criteria at the screening visit: FPG 126 mg/dl or greater and 250 mg/dl or less after an overnight fast of 8 h or longer; HbA1c 6.5–11.0% inclusive; C-peptide greater than 0.8 ng/ml; and not on an antihyperglycemic agent within 3 months of screening visit.

Patients were excluded from participation for any of the following: history of type 1 diabetes; body mass index greater than 40 kg/m2; estimated creatinine clearance 60 ml/min or less; or history of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension.

Study design

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period, crossover study. At the screening visit, eligible patients were counseled to follow a dietary program for approximately 2 wk before randomization and throughout the study. This diet was based on American Diabetes Association recommendations (55–60% carbohydrate, 10–20% protein, and not more than 30% fat by kilocalorie). Patients were randomized using a computer-generated allocation schedule to one of six possible sequences during which they received single oral doses of sitagliptin 25 or 200 mg or placebo, separated by at least a 7-d washout interval. For each treatment period, patients were instructed to consume more than 150 g of carbohydrates/d for the 3 d before their visit. On the treatment day, patients who fasted overnight for at least 10 h were administered study drug and underwent an OGTT at 2 h postdose. At 24 h postdose, patients received either an OGTT or a standardized meal challenge. For the OGTT, a 75-g glucose solution was consumed within 5 min, and for the meal challenges, a mixed meal consisting of 578 kcal (70 g carbohydrate, 21 g fat, and 27 g protein) was ingested with 240 ml water within 10 min. Standardized meals at 6 and 12 h postdose and snacks at 8 and 15.5 h postdose were also provided during each treatment period.

Efficacy and tolerability parameters

The primary efficacy end point was the glucose excursion above the pre-OGTT glucose level over a 4-h interval [incremental area under the curve (AUC)0–240 min] after administration of an OGTT at 2 h postdose. Secondary efficacy end points included incremental glucose AUC0–120 min postadministration of either an OGTT or standardized meal at 24 h postdose and plasma sitagliptin PK data. Plasma DPP-4 activity was assessed over the 24-h period. Insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon levels were determined only for the 2 h after the OGTT at 2 h postdose. Active and total incretin levels were measured after the OGTT at 2 and 24 h postdose and the standardized meal at 6 and 24 h postdose.

Tolerability was assessed by clinical and statistical review of adverse experiences, laboratory values, vital signs, electrocardiograms, and physical exams. All adverse experiences were rated by the investigator for intensity and relationship to study drug. Specific adverse experiences of clinical interest included hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal-related adverse experiences.

Assay procedures

PK. Plasma sitagliptin concentration was determined predose and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postdose. In addition, a subset of patients had additional sampling at 48 and 72 h postdose (n = 7) to determine apparent terminal half-life for sitagliptin. Details on PK assays and calculations were previously described (11).

PD. Plasma DPP-4 activity was measured as previously described (11) with blood collected at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postdose.

For the OGTT at 2 h postdose, blood was collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 h after glucose ingestion and used to measure plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon levels. For meals or OGTTs at other time points, blood samples were obtained at 0, 0.5, 1, and 2 h, and only plasma glucose was determined. Glucose was measured with a glucose/hexokinase assay kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals Corp., Indianapolis, IN). Insulin was assayed by the Elecsys insulin system (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Glucagon was determined using a RIA kit using double-antibody methodology (Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA). C-peptide was assayed using an ELISA kit (American Laboratory Products, Co., Windham, NH).

For plasma active and total GLP-1 and GIP and glucose concentrations, blood was collected at 0, 2 (before OGTT), 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 6.5, 7, 8, 24 (before OGTT or standardized meal), 24.5, 25, and 26 h postdose. Active and total GLP-1 levels were measured with specific commercially available ELISA kits (Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, MO) and as previously described (11). Active and total GIP levels were measured as previously described (12, 13, 14).

Statistical methods

The incremental glucose AUC0–240 min after the OGTT at 2 h postdose was analyzed in the log scale using an appropriate ANOVA model for a complete three-period, crossover design. The ANOVA model included factors for subject, period, and treatment. Backtransformed summary statistics including geometric least-squares (LS) means, geometric mean ratio (GMR) for between-treatment comparisons (with 95% confidence interval), and P values for the between-treatment comparisons were provided. Similar analyses were performed on the incremental glucose AUC0–120 min after an OGTT at 24 h postdose and other metabolic parameters.

An ANOVA was used to compare the effect of sitagliptin vs. placebo on the weighted average inhibition of DPP-4 activity through 24 h relative to the baseline activity (area under DPP-4 inhibition time curve divided by 24 h). Predose measurements at each period were used as baseline. All analyses were carried out in the log-percent scale, and final results were reported as percent inhibition.

The active and total incretin concentrations and the active to total ratios after the OGTTs [i.e. area under the weighted average augmentation (WAA) of GLP-1 or GIP concentration time curve divided by 2 or 4 h] were compared between sitagliptin and placebo in the same manner as the weighted average inhibition in DPP-4 activity. All tests of significance were performed at alpha = 0.05, two-tailed.

PK/PD assessment

The relationship between PD parameters and plasma sitagliptin concentration was also explored. Individual values for plasma DPP-4 inhibition were pooled over all of the patients and doses and were plotted vs. plasma sitagliptin concentrations. A simple maximum response (Emax) model was used to describe the inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity relative to plasma sitagliptin concentrations, in which Emax was set at 100%. EC50 (the concentration needed for 50% plasma DPP-4 inhibition) was estimated using the Gauss-Newton method (15). Because 80% or more inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity was associated with maximal reductions in glycemic excursion after an OGTT in mice (10), EC80 was also estimated.

In a subset of patients who completed an OGTT at both 2 and 24 h postdose (n = 19), the relationship between plasma sitagliptin concentrations and the reduction of post-OGTT incremental glucose (i.e. GMR for incremental glucose AUC0–120 min after sitagliptin/incremental glucose AUC0–120 min after placebo) was explored, assuming that an empirical inhibitory Emax PK/PD model could describe the relationship. Use of the GMR provided a control for placebo effects. Similar analyses were conducted to explore treatment-related increases in the WAA GLP-1 and GIP GMR using Emax PK/PD models. In this model, Emax represents the maximal drug effect, and E0 represents the baseline effect. EC50 was calculated and represents the plasma concentration required to achieve 50% of the maximal effect. The predicted plasma concentration where 75% of the maximal effect would be observed (EC75) was also estimated to represent near-maximal effects.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

Sixty-one patients were enrolled in the study, and 60 completed all three periods. Five patients were not included in the efficacy analysis: one patient was lost to follow-up after period 1; four patients were considered protocol violators (including three patients who were enrolled twice at different study centers). All patients were included in the safety assessment (n = 61). Of the 58 patients (excluding the three patients who enrolled twice), there were 42 men and 16 women with an average age of 50.0 yr (range 33–60 yr), weight of 87.6 kg (range 60.4–134.7 kg), and body mass index of 29.5 kg/m2 (range 26.0–38.1 kg/m2). The racial breakdown was 35 Caucasians, 2 blacks, and 21 Hispanics. At baseline, mean FPG was 182.2 mg/dl (range 116–291 mg/dl), and HbA1c was 8.3% (range 6.5–11.7%) in these patients.

PD

Mean percent inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity from baseline (i.e. predose) to 24 h is shown in Fig. 1AGo. Sitagliptin dose-dependently inhibited plasma DPP-4 activity. Plasma DPP-4 activity was inhibited by approximately 80 and 96% at 2 h postdose and 47 and 80% at 24 h postdose with sitagliptin 25 and 200 mg, respectively (Fig. 1AGo). The mean percent inhibition of DPP-4 activity over 24 h was significantly (P < 0.001) greater with both doses of sitagliptin [25 mg: 68.1% (95% confidence interval 66.6, 69.6) and 200 mg: 91.4% (90.9, 91.8)], compared with placebo [2.1% (–2.8, 6.7)], and the difference between sitagliptin doses was significant. For inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity vs. plasma sitagliptin concentrations (Fig. 1BGo), approximately 50% inhibition was observed with a plasma sitagliptin concentration of 25.3 (0.5) nM [fitted EC50 value; mean (SE)], whereas EC80 was approximately 100 nM (EC80).


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. A, Percent inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity after administration of single oral doses of sitagliptin 25 (white circles) or 200 mg (black triangles) or placebo (black circles) from predose to 24 h postdose. Values presented next to vertical dotted lines represent percent plasma DPP-4 inhibition at the specific time point for each treatment. All data are expressed as geometric mean ± SE. B, Inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity vs. sitagliptin plasma concentrations (individual observations and model-fitted regression line). Inset represents plot on a semilogarithmic scale.

 
The active and total GLP-1 profiles are shown in Fig. 2Go, A and B. After an OGTT at 2 h postdose, both sitagliptin doses significantly (P < 0.001) increased WAA active GLP-1 levels by approximately 2-fold relative to placebo (Fig. 2CGo). After an OGTT at 24 h postdose, sitagliptin 25 and 200 mg significantly (P < 0.001) increased WAA active GLP-1 levels by approximately 1.3- and 1.9-fold, respectively, compared with placebo; the difference between doses was also significant (Fig. 2CGo). Weighted average total GLP-1 was significantly reduced by 10–17% with sitagliptin, compared with placebo, after the OGTTs at 2 and 24 h postdose (Fig. 2CGo). The ratios of active to total GLP-1 levels, compared with placebo, were increased to a similar extent as the active GLP-1 results (data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Plasma profiles of active GLP-1 (A) and total GLP-1 (B) concentrations after administration of single oral doses of sitagliptin 25 (white circles) or 200 mg (black triangles) or placebo (black circles) and OGTTs at 2 and 24 h postdose and a standardized meal at 6 h postdose. Data are expressed as geometric mean ± SE. C, Weighted average of plasma active and total GLP-1 concentrations after single-dose administration of sitagliptin or placebo and OGTTs at 2 or 24 h postdose. Weighted averages over 4 h were calculated after an OGTT at 2 h postdose, and weighted averages over 2 h were calculated after an OGTT at 24 h postdose. Data are expressed as geometric LS mean ± SE. *, P < 0.001 sitagliptin vs. placebo; {dagger}, P < 0.05 for sitagliptin vs. placebo; {ddagger}, P < 0.001 for sitagliptin 200 vs. 25 mg.

 
Active and total GIP profiles are displayed in Fig. 3Go, A and B. Relative to placebo, WAA active GIP levels were significantly (P < 0.001) increased by approximately 2-fold with both sitagliptin doses after the OGTT at 2 h postdose and 1.4-fold with 25 mg and 2-fold with 200 mg after the OGTT at 24 h postdose (Fig. 3CGo). The difference between sitagliptin doses was also significant (P < 0.001) at 24 h postdose. After the OGTT at 2 and 24 h postdose, weighted average total GIP levels were significantly reduced by 16–29% after treatment with sitagliptin, compared with placebo (Fig. 3CGo). The ratio of active to total GIP levels was increased by approximately 1.7-fold with both doses after the OGTT at 2 h and approximately 1.5-fold with 25 mg and 2-fold with 200 mg after the OGTT at 24 h relative to placebo. Comparable effects on active and total GLP-1 and GIP levels were observed after meals administered at 6 and 24 h postdose (data not shown).


Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Plasma profiles of active GIP (A) and total GIP (B) concentrations after administration of single oral doses of sitagliptin 25 (white circles) or 200 mg (black triangles) or placebo (black circles) and OGTTs at 2 and 24 h postdose and a standardized meal at 6 h postdose. Data are expressed as geometric mean ± SE. C, Weighted average of plasma active and total GIP concentrations after single-dose administration of sitagliptin or placebo and OGTTs at 2 or 24 h postdose. Weighted averages over 4 h were calculated after an OGTT at 2 h postdose, and weighted averages over 2 h were calculated after an OGTT at 24 h postdose. Data are expressed as geometric LS mean ± SE. *, P < 0.001 sitagliptin vs. placebo; {dagger}, P < 0.05 for sitagliptin vs. placebo; {ddagger}, P < 0.001 for sitagliptin 200 vs. 25 mg.

 
During the OGTT at 2 h postdose, sitagliptin 25 and 200 mg significantly (P ≤ 0.001) reduced mean incremental glucose AUC0–240 min by 22 and 26%, respectively, compared with placebo (Fig. 4AGo and Table 1Go). Both sitagliptin doses significantly increased insulin (21–22%) and C-peptide concentrations (13–21%) and decreased glucagon concentrations (7–14%) after the OGTT at 2 h postdose relative to placebo (Fig. 4Go, B–D, and Table 1Go).


Figure 4
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Plasma glucose (A), serum insulin (B), serum C-peptide (C), and plasma glucagon (D) concentrations after administration of single oral doses of sitagliptin 25 (white circles) or 200 mg (black triangles) or placebo (black circles) and an OGTT at 2 h postdose. Plasma glucose concentrations are also displayed for the 2 h after a standardized meal at 6 h postdose and an OGTT at 24 h postdose. Data are expressed as geometric mean ± SE.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Comparison of concentration-time AUCs for plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon after single-dose administration of sitagliptin 25 or 200 mg or placebo and an OGTT at 2 or 24 h postdose

 
For patients administered an OGTT at 24 h postdose (n = 19), incremental glucose AUC0–120 min was significantly (P ≤ 0.001) reduced by 18% with the 200-mg dose and was numerically but not significantly lower by 9% with the 25-mg dose, compared with placebo (Table 1Go). In the subset of patients administered a standardized meal at 24 h postdose, sitagliptin did not significantly reduce postmeal glucose, although the level of glucose excursion after placebo administration was modest.

PK

Plasma sitagliptin AUC0–24 h [geometric LS mean (SD) = 1.55 (0.29) and 14.10 (3.13) µM·h], Cmax [140.0 (35.1) and 1923 (661.0) nM], C2 h [106 (43) and 1627 (791) nM], and C24 h [22.2 (7.5) and 96.3 (41.3) nM] were increased dose dependently, and median Tmax was 4 and 2 h with sitagliptin 25 and 200 mg, respectively. In a subset of patients with plasma sampling up to 72 h postdose (n = 7), the apparent terminal half-life [harmonic mean (jackknife SD)] for sitagliptin averaged 13.1 (2.6) h for 25 mg and 11.0 (1.8) h for 200 mg.

PK/PD relationships

Sitagliptin PK/PD data were modeled in a subset of patients (n = 19) who completed an OGTT at both 2 and 24 h postdose. In this subset of patients, both doses of sitagliptin were associated with incretin effects and glucose-lowering after the OGTT at 2 h postdose that were similar to the results shown in Figs. 3CGo and 4CGo and Table 1Go for the entire cohort. The relationship between plasma sitagliptin concentrations and the change in post-OGTT incremental glucose or active GLP-1 and GIP concentrations was explored with an empirical inhibitory Emax PK/PD model. For the purpose of this analysis, near-maximal effects were arbitrarily defined as 75% of the theoretical maximal effect (EC75). In Table 2Go, the results are provided for the model that fit sitagliptin concentration vs. post-OGTT incremental glucose AUC0–120 min GMR (sitagliptin/placebo) and the WAA active GLP-1 and GIP GMR (sitagliptin/placebo) along with EC75 results. The predicted EC75 values for reduction of post-OGTT incremental glucose and increases in active GLP-1 levels were both approximately 100 nM, which was similar to the EC80 described above for inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity. The predicted EC75 for effects on active GIP levels was lower at approximately 65 nM.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Fitted PK/PD model parameters and predicted EC75 values for sitagliptin plasma concentration vs. GMRs for post-OGTT incremental glucose AUC0–120 min, weighted average active GLP-1, and weighted average active GIP after single oral doses of sitagliptin and OGTTs

 
Tolerability

Sitagliptin doses were well tolerated, with an adverse experience profile that was generally similar to that observed with placebo. There were no serious adverse experiences during the sitagliptin treatment periods. One patient experienced a myocardial infarction 24 h postdose after receiving placebo, and the investigator did not consider this serious adverse experience to be related to study drug. No clinical or laboratory adverse experiences of hypoglycemia were reported. The incidence of gastrointestinal-related adverse experiences including nausea and vomiting was similar across the three treatments. No clinically significant, treatment-related changes from baseline were noted in routine blood and urine chemistry panels, complete blood count, electrocardiogram, vital signs, and physical examinations.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study was the first clinical evaluation of the PK, PD, and tolerability of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes. The single dose PK profile of sitagliptin in these patients was similar to that previously observed in healthy subjects (11). Plasma sitagliptin AUC increased in a dose-dependent manner. Sitagliptin dose-dependently inhibited plasma DPP-4 activity over 24 h. A simple Emax model predicted an EC50 for plasma DPP-4 inhibition of approximately 25 nM and an EC80 of approximately 100 nM in these patients, which was nearly identical with the values estimated in healthy subjects (11).

In the present study, sitagliptin produced approximately 2-fold elevations in weighted average active GLP-1 and GIP levels during an OGTT 2 h postdose. At 24 h postdose, the 2-fold increases in active GLP-1 and GIP were still present for the 200-mg dose during either an OGTT or meal tolerance test. In agreement, vildagliptin 100 mg twice a day increased the mean GLP-1 and GIP levels (i.e. AUC/time) over the 13.5-h period after dosing by approximately 2-fold relative to placebo after 1 d of treatment (16). Sitagliptin enhanced incretin levels by inhibiting degradation of the active form rather than increasing secretion because the ratios of active to total GLP-1 and GIP were increased, and total GLP-1 or GIP levels were reduced. Augmentation in active GLP-1 and GIP levels and reduction in total GLP-1 and GIP levels were observed in dogs with the DPP-4 inhibitor, NVP-DPP728, suggesting a possible feedback mechanism with increased secretion of intact peptides (17).

Treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors in the double incretin (GLP-1 and GIP) receptor knockout mice did not lower plasma glucose levels after an OGTT (18), suggesting that GLP-1 and GIP are major mediators of the glucoregulatory effects of DPP-4 inhibitors. These incretins lower glucose via multiple mechanisms including glucose-dependent increases in insulin (GLP-1 and GIP) and decreases in glucagon (GLP-1) release (19). In the present study, both insulin and C-peptide levels were significantly increased, and glucagon levels were significantly reduced with sitagliptin during an OGTT at 2 h postdose. These changes in glucoregulatory hormones were associated with 22–26% reduction in glucose excursion with sitagliptin treatment after an OGTT at 2 h postdose. The effectiveness of sitagliptin 200 mg was observed 24 h postdose with an 18% reduction in glucose observed during an OGTT. Effects on post-OGTT glucose were less apparent at 24 h postdose after the 25-mg dose. Treatment with other DPP-4 inhibitors has demonstrated similar effects of postprandial glucose, insulin, and/or glucagon concentrations after a meal (7, 8, 16).

The levels of DPP-4 inhibition and active GLP-1 and GIP augmentation required for maximal postprandial glucose lowering in humans has not been completely elucidated with DPP-4 inhibitors. In contrast to therapy with GLP-1 analogs, DPP-4 inhibitor-related effects on incretin levels are episodic and meal related, making extrapolations from results with exogenously administered GLP-1 analogs problematic. Therefore, sitagliptin PK and PD data were evaluated in the 19 patients who completed an OGTT at both 2 and 24 h postdose. Before the OGTT at 2 h postdose, plasma sitagliptin levels were greater than 100 nM, and inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity was greater than 80% with both sitagliptin doses. In response to an OGTT at 2 h postdose, active GLP-1 and GIP levels increased greater than 2-fold with both doses. At 24 h postdose, plasma sitagliptin concentration was approximately 100 nM with the 200-mg dose, providing about 80% plasma DPP-4 inhibition and was associated with nearly 2-fold augmentation of active GLP-1 and GIP levels after an OGTT. In contrast, at 24-h after the 25-mg dose, plasma sitagliptin concentration was less than 25 nM, DPP-4 inhibition was less than 50%, and 1.4-fold or less increases in active GLP-1 and GIP levels were observed after the OGTT. Based on these observations, near-maximal post-OGTT glucose-lowering effect with DPP-4 inhibition was associated with plasma sitagliptin concentrations of 100 nM or greater, inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity of 80% or greater, and 2-fold or greater enhancement of active GLP-1 and GIP levels. Similarly, in sitagliptin-treated lean C57BL/6N mice, near-maximal glucose lowering efficacy during an OGTT was observed with approximately 80% DPP-4 inhibition and 2- to 3-fold increases in active GLP-1 levels (10).

These observations were corroborated by examining the relationship between sitagliptin plasma concentrations and stabilization of active GLP-1 and GIP levels or post-OGTT glucose lowering using Emax models. Based on this modeling, 80% inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity (EC80) was predicted to be associated with a plasma sitagliptin concentration of approximately 100 nM. Similarly, the predicted plasma concentration was approximately 100 nM for 75% of the maximal effects (EC75) on reduction in post-OGTT incremental glucose levels, whereas the EC75 was approximately 110 nM and 65 nM for active GLP-1 and GIP levels, respectively.

Treatment with single doses of sitagliptin was generally well tolerated in this study. There were no treatment-related clinically relevant changes in vital signs and laboratory measurements with any treatment. Due to the effect of DPP-4 on the gut peptides, GLP-1 and GIP (20, 21), gastrointestinal-related adverse experiences including nausea and vomiting were of special clinical interest, and the incidence was similar among treatments in this study. Hypoglycemia was not observed, either by clinical or laboratory assessment. This result was not unexpected considering that glucose-lowering effects of incretins are glucose dependent (22).

In the present study in patients with type 2 diabetes, the PK/PD results predicted that sitagliptin doses that produced plasma sitagliptin concentrations of 100 nM or greater over 24 h would provide the necessary inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity (80% or greater) and enhancement of active GLP-1 and GIP (2-fold or greater) to receive the near-maximal post-OGTT glucose lowering effect with DPP-4 inhibition. In healthy adults, single doses of sitagliptin of 100 mg or more were associated with plasma sitagliptin concentrations of at least 100 nM over 24 h (11). Longer-term studies are underway to assess the chronic efficacy of once-daily sitagliptin.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Merck & Co. (Whitehouse Station, NJ).

Summary of disclosure information: G.A.H., A.B., C.S., K.S., D.H., M.T., C.C., M.D.S., I.d.L., K.V.D., A.Q.W., W.Z., M.J.D., W.T., K.M.G., and J.A.W. are Merck & Co., Inc. or MSD employees and hold equity interests in the company. P.K., B.Y., and P.Z. were previously employed by Merck & Co., Inc. B.D., G.G., A.S., B.K., K.C.L., and M.S.K. have nothing to declare. J.J.H. consults for Merck & Co., Inc. and has received lecture fees from Merck & Co., Inc. C.F.D. consults for Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Takeda and has received lecture fees from Merck & Co., Inc.

First Published Online August 23, 2006

Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the curve; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; Emax, maximum response; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide; GLP, glucagon-like peptide; GMR, geometric mean ratio; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; LS, least squares; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PD, pharmacodynamic; PK, pharmacokinetic; WAA, weighted average augmentation.

Received May 10, 2006.

Accepted August 3, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Mest HJ, Mentlein R 2005 Dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitors as new drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 48:616–620[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Ahren B, Schmitz O 2004 GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Horm Metab Res 36:867–876[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Holst JJ, Gromada J 2004 Role of incretin hormones in the regulation of insulin secretion in diabetic and nondiabetic humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 287:E199–E206
  4. Reimer MK, Holst JJ, Ahren B 2002 Long-term inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV improves glucose tolerance and preserves islet function in mice. Eur J Endocrinol 146:717–727[Abstract]
  5. Ahren B, Holst JJ, Martensson H, Balkan B 2000 Improved glucose tolerance and insulin secretion by inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV in mice. Eur J Pharmacol 404:239–245[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Pospisilik JA, Stafford SG, Demuth HU, Brownsey R, Parkhouse W, Finegood DT, McIntosh CH, Pederson RA 2002 Long-term treatment with the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor P32/98 causes sustained improvements in glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, hyperinsulinemia, and ß-cell glucose responsiveness in VDF (fa/fa) Zucker rats. Diabetes 51:943–950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ahren B, Landin-Olsson M, Jansson PA, Svensson M, Holmes D, Schweizer A 2004 Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 reduces glycemia, sustains insulin levels, and reduces glucagon levels in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2078–2084[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ahren B, Simonsson E, Larsson H, Landin-Olsson M, Torgeirsson H, Jansson PA, Sandqvist M, Bavenholm P, Efendic S, Eriksson JW, Dickinson S, Holmes D 2002 Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV improves metabolic control over a 4-week study period in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:869–875[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ahren B, Gomis R, Standl E, Mills D, Schweizer A 2004 Twelve- and 52-week efficacy of the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor LAF237 in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27:2874–2880[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kim D, Wang L, Beconi M, Eiermann GJ, Fisher MH, He H, Hickey GJ, Kowalchick JE, Leiting B, Lyons K, Marsilio F, McCann ME, Patel RA, Petrov A, Scapin G, Patel SB, Roy RS, Wu JK, Wyvratt MJ, Zhang BB, Zhu L, Thornberry NA, Weber AE 2005 (2R)-4-oxo-4-[3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6-dihydro[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazin-7(8H)-yl]1-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)butan-2-amine: a potent, orally active dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. J Med Chem 48:141–151[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Herman GA, Stevens C, Van Dyck K, Bergman A, Yi B, De Smet M, Snyder K, Hilliard D, Tanen M, Tanaka W, Wang AQ, Chen L, Zeng W, Musson D, Laethem M, Zhou YY, Winchell G, Davies MJ, Ramael S, Gottesdiener KM, Wagner JA 2005 Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single doses of sitagliptin, an inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV, in healthy subjects. Clin Pharm Ther 78:675–688[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Krarup T, Holst JJ 1984 The heterogeneity of gastric inhibitory polypeptide in porcine and human gastrointestinal mucosa evaluated with five different antisera. Regul Pept 9:35–46[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Krarup T, Madsbad S, Moody AJ, Regeur L, Faber OK, Holst JJ, Sestoft L 1983 Diminished immunoreactive gastric inhibitory polypeptide response to a meal in newly diagnosed type I (insulin-dependent) diabetics. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 56:1306–1312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Deacon CF, Nauck MA, Meier J, Hucking K, Holst JJ 2000 Degradation of endogenous and exogenous gastric inhibitory polypeptide in healthy and in type 2 diabetic subjects as revealed using a new assay for the intact peptide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:3575–3581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hartley HO 1961 The modified Gauss-Newton method for the fitting of non-linear regression functions by least squares. Technometrics 3:269–280[CrossRef]
  16. Mari A, Sallas WM, He YL, Watson C, Ligueros-Saylan M, Dunning BE, Deacon CF, Holst JJ, Foley JE 2005 Vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor, improves model-assessed ß-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:4888–4894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Deacon CF, Wamberg S, Bie P, Hughes TE, Holst JJ 2002 Preservation of active incretin hormones by inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV suppresses meal-induced incretin secretion in dogs. J Endocrinol 172:355–362[Abstract]
  18. Hansotia T, Baggio LL, Delmeire D, Hinke SA, Yamada Y, Tsukiyama K, Seino Y, Holst JJ, Schuit F, Drucker DJ 2004 Double incretin receptor knockout (DIRKO) mice reveal an essential role for the enteroinsular axis in transducing the glucoregulatory actions of DPP-IV inhibitors. Diabetes 53:1326–1335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gautier JF, Fetita S, Sobngwi E, Salaun-Martin C 2005 Biological actions of the incretins GIP and GLP-1 and therapeutic perspectives in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab 31:233–242[Medline]
  20. Mentlein R 1999 Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV (CD26)—role in the inactivation of regulatory peptides. Regul Pept 85:9–24[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Zhu L, Tamvakopoulos C, Xie D, Dragovic J, Shen X, Fenyk-Melody JE, Schmidt K, Bagchi A, Griffin PR, Thornberry NA, Sinha RR 2003 The role of dipeptidyl peptidase IV in the cleavage of glucagon family peptides: in vivo metabolism of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide-(1–38). J Biol Chem 278:22418–22423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Nauck MA, Kleine N, Orskov C, Holst JJ, Willms B, Creutzfeldt W 1993 Normalization of fasting hyperglycaemia by exogenous glucagon-like peptide 1 (7–36 amide) in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Diabetologia 36:741–744[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiabetesHome page
J. G. Barrera, D. A. D'Alessio, D. J. Drucker, S. C. Woods, and R. J. Seeley
Differences in the Central Anorectic Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 and Exendin-4 in Rats
Diabetes, December 1, 2009; 58(12): 2820 - 2827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
D. H. Wright, G. A. Herman, A. Maes, Q. Liu, A. O. Johnson-Levonas, and J. A. Wagner
Multiple Doses of Sitagliptin, a Selective DPP-4 Inhibitor, Do Not Meaningfully Alter Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Warfarin
J. Clin. Pharmacol., October 1, 2009; 49(10): 1157 - 1167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
R. K. Campbell and S. Miller
New Therapeutic Horizons: Mapping the Future of Glycemic Control With Incretin-based Therapy
The Diabetes Educator, September 1, 2009; 35(5): 731 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
N. J. Brown, S. Byiers, D. Carr, M. Maldonado, and B. A. Warner
Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV Inhibitor Use Associated With Increased Risk of ACE Inhibitor-Associated Angioedema
Hypertension, September 1, 2009; 54(3): 516 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
D. M. Bloomfield, R. Krishna, D. Hreniuk, L. Hickey, K. Ghosh, A. J. Bergman, J. Miller, M. J. Gutierrez, R. Stoltz, K. M. Gottesdiener, et al.
A Thorough QTc Study to Assess the Effect of Sitagliptin, a DPP4 Inhibitor, on Ventricular Repolarization in Healthy Subjects
J. Clin. Pharmacol., August 1, 2009; 49(8): 937 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. E. B. Couri, M. C. B. Oliveira, A. B. P. L. Stracieri, D. A. Moraes, F. Pieroni, G. M. N. Barros, M. I. A. Madeira, K. C. R. Malmegrim, M. C. Foss-Freitas, B. P. Simoes, et al.
C-Peptide Levels and Insulin Independence Following Autologous Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
JAMA, April 15, 2009; 301(15): 1573 - 1579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
H. Yan, W. Gu, J. Yang, V. Bi, Y. Shen, E. Lee, K. A. Winters, R. Komorowski, C. Zhang, J. J. Patel, et al.
Fully Human Monoclonal Antibodies Antagonizing the Glucagon Receptor Improve Glucose Homeostasis in Mice and Monkeys
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2009; 329(1): 102 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Ban, M. H. Noyan-Ashraf, J. Hoefer, S.-S. Bolz, D. J. Drucker, and M. Husain
Cardioprotective and Vasodilatory Actions of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Are Mediated Through Both Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor-Dependent and -Independent Pathways
Circulation, May 6, 2008; 117(18): 2340 - 2350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cleveland Clinic Journal of MedicineHome page
Z. BLOOMGARDEN and A. DREXLER
What role will 'gliptins' play in glycemic control?
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, April 1, 2008; 75(4): 305 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. DiabetesHome page
J. R. White Jr.
Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV Inhibitors: Pharmacological Profile and Clinical Use
Clin. Diabetes, April 1, 2008; 26(2): 53 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
D. Q. Pham, A. Nogid, and R. Plakogiannis
Sitagliptin: A novel agent for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 15, 2008; 65(6): 521 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
J. J. Neumiller, P. S. Odegard, J. R. White Jr., S. M. Setter, and R. K. Campbell
Looking to the Future: Focus on DPP-4 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes and Emerging Therapies
The Diabetes Educator, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 183 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. E. Inzucchi and D. K. McGuire
New Drugs for the Treatment of Diabetes: Part II: Incretin-Based Therapy and Beyond
Circulation, January 29, 2008; 117(4): 574 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
B. J. Lamont and D. J. Drucker
Differential Antidiabetic Efficacy of Incretin Agonists Versus DPP-4 Inhibition in High Fat Fed Mice
Diabetes, January 1, 2008; 57(1): 190 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
G. Flock, L. L. Baggio, C. Longuet, and D. J. Drucker
Incretin Receptors for Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 and Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Are Essential for the Sustained Metabolic Actions of Vildagliptin in Mice
Diabetes, December 1, 2007; 56(12): 3006 - 3013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. El-Ouaghlidi, E. Rehring, J. J. Holst, A. Schweizer, J. Foley, D. Holmes, and M. A. Nauck
The Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor Vildagliptin Does Not Accentuate Glibenclamide-Induced Hypoglycemia but Reduces Glucose-Induced Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 and Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide Secretion
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4165 - 4171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
B. J. Goldstein, M. N. Feinglos, J. K. Lunceford, J. Johnson, D. E. Williams-Herman, and for the Sitagliptin 036 Study Group
Effect of Initial Combination Therapy With Sitagliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, and Metformin on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2007; 30(8): 1979 - 1987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
B. Ahren
Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors: Clinical data and clinical implications
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2007; 30(6): 1344 - 1350.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
B. E. Dunning and J. E. Gerich
The Role of {alpha}-Cell Dysregulation in Fasting and Postprandial Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes and Therapeutic Implications
Endocr. Rev., May 1, 2007; 28(3): 253 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
Y.-L. He, Y. Wang, J. M. Bullock, C. F. Deacon, J. J. Holst, B. E. Dunning, M. Ligueros-Saylan, and J. E. Foley
Pharmacodynamics of Vildagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes During OGTT
J. Clin. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 47(5): 633 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
G. C. Mistry, A. J. Bergman, W.-L. Luo, C. Cilissen, W. Haazen, M. J. Davies, K. M. Gottesdiener, J. A. Wagner, and G. A. Herman
Multiple-Dose Administration of Sitagliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, Does Not Alter the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Rosiglitazone in Healthy Subjects
J. Clin. Pharmacol., February 1, 2007; 47(2): 159 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
B. Charbonnel, A. Karasik, J. Liu, M. Wu, G. Meininger, and for the Sitagliptin Study 020 Group
Efficacy and Safety of the Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Sitagliptin Added to Ongoing Metformin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Alone
Diabetes Care, December 1, 2006; 29(12): 2638 - 2643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herman, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herman, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals