| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Institute of Reproductive Medicine of the University, D-48129 Münster, Germany
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Professor Dr. E. Nieschlag, F.R.C.P., Institute of Reproductive Medicine of the University, Domagkstr. 11, D-48129 Münster, Germany. E-mail: eberhard.nieschlag{at}ukmuenster.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: The objective of the study was investigation of factors influencing complaint structures in aging male patients.
Design: This was a cross-sectional cohort study.
Setting: The study was conducted in an andrological outpatient department.
Patients: Subjects included 434 consecutive male patients aged 5086 yr.
Main Outcome Measures: The following hypotheses were measured: 1) psychosomatic complaints and metabolic factors in aging male patients are related to sex hormone levels in a symptom-specific manner, and 2) patients form subcohorts.
Results: A clear-cut threshold for late-onset hypogonadism was not found; rather, prevalence of psychosomatic symptoms and metabolic risk factors accumulated with decreasing androgen levels. For example, androgen-induced prevalence of loss of libido or vigor increased below testosterone concentrations of 15 nmol/liter (P < 0.001), whereas depression and diabetes mellitus type 2 (also in nonobese men) were significantly more present in men with testosterone concentrations below 10 nmol/liter (P < 0.001). Erectile dysfunction was identified as a composite pathology of metabolic risk factors, smoking, and depressivity, whereas only testosterone concentrations below 8 nmol/liter contributed to that symptom (P = 0.003). Cluster analysis revealed aging men to present within three independent groups characterized by psychosomatic complaints, metabolic disorders, and sexual health problems. These subgroups of patients exhibit distinct features in terms of androgen levels, age, and body mass index.
Conclusions: There is no evidence that a uniform structure of testosterone concentrations and complaints exists within the cohort of elderly male patients. Rather, in aging male patients, psychosomatic complaints and metabolic risk relate to testosterone in a symptom-specific manner.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Physicians treating elderly men encounter patient cohorts exhibiting differential profiles of complaints of gradual onset and ambiguous nature. To provide proper investigation and treatment, these men must be assessed by trained physicians following systematic techniques. The putative pathologies require an approach that, however, implies assessment beyond specifically male topics: multiple organ systems and metabolic factors, e.g. diabetes mellitus type 2, have to be considered (2, 3).
Within the group of aging males, late-onset hypogonadism (LOH) is a clinical and biochemical syndrome associated with advancing age. It may result in a significant detriment of psychosocial function and adversely affect multiple organ systems (3). Studies surveying population-based cohorts, e.g. the Men in Australia Telephone Survey (MATeS) (1) or the Massachusetts Male Aging Study (MMAS; e.g. Ref. 4), provide useful information about the prevalence and incidence of nosologies in elderly, community-dwelling men. However, these cohorts do not represent patients, i.e. not the persons actually seeking diagnosis and possible treatment. Consequently, it is of paramount importance to assess the nosological profiles of elderly male patients to provide physicians with necessary tools for adequate treatment.
Clinical evaluations of elderly men may point toward androgen-related complaints, hence symptoms of LOH, as described in the International Society of Andrology/International Society for the Study of the Aging Male/European Association of Urology recommendation 2 (3), such as decreased sexual desire, erectile quality, cognitive functions, and mood as well as sleep disturbances and changes of body composition. The designation of a reliable testosterone threshold below which hypogonadism-related symptoms start is, to date, at best arbitrary. No pathognomonic findings exist in relation to specific androgen concentrations for clinically relevant subsets of older men (International Society of Andrology/International Society for the Study of the Aging Male/European Association of Urology recommendation 3 sentence 2) (2, 3).
In fact, dose-titrating studies as well as cross-sectional observations suggest a nonlinearity of testosterone effects, which is most likely also tissue specific. This nonlinearity is probably caused by saturation effects at the androgen receptor level and may be the reason for marked effects of testosterone treatment being caused by small changes within the low range of testosterone concentrations, whereas within the normal range, marked increases of testosterone levels are needed to cause only limited effects (5, 6, 7).
Here we describe a patient-oriented and clinically practical approach based on individuals and symptoms and provide novel insights into complaints of these patients, who suffer to a degree that causes them to seek specialists advice. The notion that common and uniform concentrations of androgen levels can be applied to describe the increasing prevalence of testosterone-related symptoms in elderly men will be challenged in this paper.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Institute of Reproductive Medicine of the University Clinics (Muenster, Germany) is an endocrinological and andrological unit caring for male patients for more than 30 yr. A standardized procedure for the assessment of elderly male patients has been applied since the beginning of our outpatient department and consists of a structured interview (see Methods).
Although no defined age threshold exists for LOH, only male patients with an age of at least 50 yr who attended the institute between 1995 and 2005 were primarily eligible for this study (n = 616 of a total 9715 men attending the institute during this time period). The screening procedures were designed to select either eugonadal men or patients with LOH, which is an exclusion diagnosis (2, 3), to assess the effects of both testosterone and aging on the complaints of elderly men. Thus, all other causes for hypogonadism have been excluded in the patients of this study. Such cases are likely to act as confounders in regard to the above named purpose of the study because the classical forms of primary or secondary hypogonadism in older men are likely to have been present for a number of years and have, in most instances, already been treated by various means.
Hence, in a second screening step, subjects with previous external treatment exposure to androgens (n = 120) as well as Klinefelter patients (n = 41) were excluded. Persons with classical primary or secondary hypogonadism were excluded after appropriate assessment of history and endocrine diagnostics including GnRH-stimulation tests and prolactin determination and exclusion of pituitary adenomas by magnetic resonance tomography in case of decreased gonadotropin levels or elevated prolactin levels (n = 14). To stratify the cohort in regard to sexual symptoms, only men living within a partnership were included. This led to exclusion of men living alone (n = 7). Altogether 434 men aged between 50 and 86 yr were included for evaluation and data collection was comprehensive. All of them attended the clinic for at least one of the complaints mentioned in this study. The upper and lower limits for LH levels were set between 1 and 15 IU/liter by adding/subtracting 50% to/from the normal range values (the normal range of the assay is 210 IU/liter) to confine the cohort to men with the most likely diagnosis of LOH should they exhibit low androgen levels. This was performed to assure further that no men with classical primary or secondary hypogonadism were included because LH concentrations are most likely to be found out of this range in such cases. Indeed, this procedure led to no further exclusions, corroborating the screening procedures to select appropriate patients.
Analysis of patient data were performed by extraction of our electronic database (8). All patients gave written informed consent for the use of their data for scientific evaluation as approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany, and the state medical board. There is no conflict of interest for any author.
Methods
Interview. The structured interview items applied to all patients were as follows:
Questions marked with an asterisk are detailed below.
This approach provides the physician with an easy, reliable and consistent means of patient assessment, simultaneously allowing close interaction between patient and doctor Interobserver stability is demonstrated by Cohens kappa for the specific items ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 in 98 randomly selected patients being reassessed after 3 months without therapy, with P < 0.001 for each item. The questions were kept as simple as possible to provide feasible tools for daily practice, and answers were possible only in the form of yes or no.
Biochemical analyses. All venous blood samples were obtained in a fasting state under standardized conditions between 0800 and 1200 h after a 30-min rest. Serum or plasma were separated at 800 x g. Samples were immediately stored at 20 C. Serum testosterone levels were measured with a commercial ELISA kit (DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany) and concentrations of LH, SHBG, and estradiol by highly specific time-resolved fluoroimmunoassays (Autodelfia, Freiburg, Germany). Mean intraassay coefficients of variation (CVs) were less than 5% and mean interassay CVs less than 10%. Levels of free testosterone were calculated from levels of SHBG and total serum testosterone according to previously published calculations (9). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was determined with highly specific time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (Autodelfia), with a normal limit of less than 4 µg/liter. Mean intra- and interassay CVs were less than 2 and 5%, respectively. Sampling was performed before prostate palpation and transrectal ultrasonography. Hemoglobin determination was performed on an SE 9500 system (Sysmex Europe, Hamburg, Germany).
Specific assessments
Prostate measurement. Standardized procedures of this transrectal ultrasound examination were previously published (10, 11). Subjects with PSA concentrations 4 µg/liter or greater were routinely referred to the urological department for further investigations. No malignancy was detected.
Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2. The subjects were diagnosed according to the American Diabetes Association criteria by specialists.
Obesity. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg x m2 were considered obese..
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The patient was categorized LUTS positive if any question derived from the International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire was answered with yes. This is a rather simplified approach that, however, reflects the clinical experience with our patients. Indeed, only 15% of all men were LUTS positive according to this definition (see Results). Urologists dealing with aging men may find a higher rate of LUTS because their specialty attracts such patients. Other institutions, especially urological ones, may find it meaningful to either use International Prostate Symptom Score scores as a continuous variable or define LUTS as the occurrence of a standardized score above some rational threshold.
Erectile dysfunction. The specific question was: did you have problems achieving an erection during the last 6 months, which caused you subjective disturbances in general sexual well-being? The patient was categorized with erectile dysfunction if this question was answered with yes. This is in good agreement with the one-question procedure applied in the MMAS (12) and the Australian MATeS study (1).
Alcohol consumption. Significant alcohol consumption was diagnosed as regular intake of more than 40 g of pure alcohol per day.
Cigarette smoking. Consumption of more than five cigarettes per week was determined as significant abuse of nicotine. Cigarette smoking was coded as follows: nonsmoker or ex-smoker for more than 2 yr = 0, smoker = 1, ex-smoker for less than 2 yr = 2.
Arterial hypertension. Diagnosis was made using an automated cuff device applied after 30 min of rest. Systolic blood pressure greater than 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure greater than 95 mm Hg was considered as arterial hypertension. Antihypertensive premedication was considered similarly.
| Statistics |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To assess potentially nonlinear effects of testosterone levels, it was necessary to form statistically independent subgroups according to testosterone concentrations. Power estimation indicated that with a total number of 434 men, sextiles of testosterone levels would be appropriate to obtain patient group sizes to achieve a power of 80% to detect differences at P < 0.05. The sextile ranges were chosen both to obtain sample sizes of 6090 men per sextile and represent clinically useful thresholds of total testosterone (TT) levels of round numbers (i.e. not 8.4 nmol/liter but rather 8.0 nmol/liter as a threshold). The sextiles and numbers of patients are as follows: TT less than 8 nmol/liter (n = 75), TT 8 or greater and TT less than 10 nmol/liter (n = 67), TT 10 or greater and TT less than 12 nmol/liter (n = 65), TT 12 or greater and TT less than 15 nmol/liter (n = 84), TT 15 or greater and TT less than 20 nmol/liter (n = 69), and TT 20 or greater (n = 74).
For nonobese men (n = 318), the sextiles were maintained for reasons of consistency in regard to the other analyses, although this created more variation in terms of sample size. Thus, patient numbers are respectively modified: TT less than 8 nmol/liter (n = 47), TT 8 or greater and TT less than 10 nmol/liter (n = 39), TT 10 or greater and TT less than 12 nmol/liter (n = 46), TT 12 or greater and TT less than 15 nmol/liter (n = 70), TT 15 or greater and TT less than 20 nmol/liter (n = 55), and TT 20 or greater (n = 61).
Both nonparametric and parametric procedures were used to describe the potential relation of testosterone levels to symptoms (stepwise backward Somers D test and stepwise backward binomial regression).
To detect complaint structures as well as patient profiles and describe these in relation to age, BMI, and testosterone levels, cluster analyses were performed.
To provide the reader with more information on the clinical relevance of the observed results, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were calculated, given specificity and sensitivity for testosterone-related thresholds of symptom-prevalence.
A detailed and referenced Appendix on Details on Statistical Analyses is published as supplemental data on The Endocrine Societys Journals Online web site at http://jcem.endojournals.org.
The Statistical Software SPSS (version 12.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Erectile dysfunction may serve as an example of a composite dysfunctionality in which arterial endothelial function, testosterone concentrations, and psychological status play pivotal roles (13, 14). Our results corroborate such findings, demonstrating significant influence of vessel damaging parameters (cigarette smoking, high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus), low testosterone concentrations, and mood dysbalances (depression, disturbed sleep) on the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (Table 3
).
The suspicion of LOH and, certainly, the decision for pharmacological intervention should be approached with appropriate reserve, taking the specific increment of symptom prevalence in relation to testosterone levels into account. Numerous controversies concerning TT levels and symptoms of LOH most likely originate in the application of uniform thresholds to hypogonadism (2, 3, 4, 15, 16, 17). This is reflected in the significant variation among European countries applying thresholds for hypogonadism ranging from 7.5 to 12.0 nmol/liter (18). Physicians in different countries may have different approaches to the symptoms of hypogonadism and may attribute varying values to single symptoms in regard to possible treatment. It has recently been demonstrated by application of an artificial neural network that the clinical manifestation of hypogonadism is multifactorial and that proper assessment should comprise somatic and psychological aspects (19).
First hints that symptom-specific associations of nonlinear nature might exist in regard to androgen levels are given by dose-titrating studies (5, 6) as well as observations in Klinefelter patients, in whom testosterone concentrations relate nonlinearly to androgen-dependent features (7, 20). Our study suggests that some symptoms of LOH might start at higher concentrations of androgens than other complaints (Fig. 1
). Individual and symptom-oriented treatment might apply in the future if this assumption of variable hormone-symptom-strata is correct. Attempts to apply symptom-specific thresholds of androgen levels have already been made in the MMAS, a general population-based study, corroborating our results found in patients (21, 22).
Nevertheless, the ROC analyses detailed in Table 4
indicate that it is not warranted to initiate androgen substitution in men, with, e.g. loss of libido and TT concentrations less than 15 nmol/liter, without further consideration of the individual case. Although, in this example, the prevalence of loss of libido starts to increase below TT concentrations of 15 nmol/liter, only 41% of all men with TT levels below this threshold have a loss of libido. That means, in an individual patient, loss of libido and a testosterone concentration of, e.g. 13 nmol/liter, might be coincidental. The lower the testosterone level is in a man with loss of libido, the less likely is such a coincidence (see specificity columns of Table 4
). Especially for such borderline cases, we recommend discussing treatment attempts with the patient individually, taking contraindications and side effects of testosterone therapy into account (3).
However, because the results pertain to a specific population of patients who consulted for various complaints at an andrological unit, the findings are not representative for the general population. It is also possible that patients consulting in a different setting (e.g. a nonandrological internal medicine unit or urological practice) exhibit a different profile. Thus, a certain specificity of the study population exists.
Obviously physicians also encounter patients with limited complaint profiles restricted to disturbances of sexual function. These men especially (cluster 3) will not report symptoms otherwise associated with advancing age but present in relatively good health with normal BMI and testosterone levels above the average of andrological patients, such as found within the general aging male population (23). It is important to acknowledge these men as persons deserving help. The overrepresentation of erectile dysfunction and cigarette smoking as possible indicators of a generally affected arterial endothelium should especially induce further cardiovascular assessments. Such patients are at increased cardiovascular risk (24).
A key question in regard to this investigation is the relation of our patients to the large population-based studies. Men assessed in the MMAS as well as the Australian MATeS exhibit the same age profile and BMI as our patients. However, patients show a higher prevalence of erectile dysfunction, high blood pressure, and diabetes mellitus type 2 as well as depressive moods in comparison with population-based cohorts (1, 23, 25).
Hormone values were not assessed in the Australian telephone survey, but androgen levels of the MMAS cohort (23) are markedly higher than in our total cohort of patients (with the exception of the men of cluster 3; see above), suggesting that androgen levels play a major role in pathogenesis and aggravation of symptoms, finally leading patients to consult a physician. Overall, the data suggest that the patients described here are representative of the older male in an industrialized Western country in terms of general appearance but are markedly different from the general population concerning prevalence and perception of symptoms. This observation is of paramount value because it underlines the novelty and importance of this investigation as well as its general relevance.
Another important point concerns the usefulness of symptomatological questionnaires. Such tools are probably not sufficiently predictive of prevailing testosterone concentrations in elderly men, as a major review on this topic convincingly demonstrated: the widespread use of such questionnaires as screening tools should be discouraged because of low specificity and sensitivity (2).
The items generally and consistently assessed in this study by the treating physician are fixed in paper and electronic form. The nature of these assessments is complementary to the structured interview form of the MATeS, which describes the prevalence of self-reported reproductive health disorders as well as related concerns and health behavior among middle-aged and older Australian men (1). Such an interview-related approach seems to reflect the essential and actual patient-physician interaction that is encountered on a daily basis better than a questionnaire.
Moreover questionnaires are ill suited to search for low testosterone levels (2). A certain absurdity lies in the application of standardized question-based tools to detect low testosterone levels: these can be measured in a laboratory. Treatment of patients, however, must be first directed by symptoms and should follow accepted recommendations: for older men, short-acting testosterone preparations are preferable (3).
Our study demonstrates that the androgen deficit does not exist per se but that symptoms accumulate gradually with decreasing testosterone levels (Fig. 1
). In this regard, androgen action may be, as suggested by other studies, modified by a functional polymorphism of the androgen receptor gene, the CAG repeat polymorphism. Relevant findings have been demonstrated concerning symptoms of depression in older men (14, 25) as well as physical traits and social characteristics of Klinefelter patients (19).
In addition, patients receiving testosterone substitution therapy by the long-acting regimen of sc implants corroborate the observation that the symptomatology of a developing androgen deficit occurs gradually. Patients start to feel the need for a renewed implantation by lacking vigor and libido, correspondingly to our cross-sectional cohort of elderly men. Interindividual differences of testosterone concentrations in regard to symptoms were applicable also in these men, putatively pointing to the above-named genetically modified androgen activity (26).
In conclusion, physicians have to be aware that testosterone plays a significant but not omnipresent role in older male patients and that replacement options should be based firstly on symptoms and secondly on hormone concentrations, which should be evaluated on a symptom-specific basis. Consequently, physicians treating older men should take a broad holistic view (see multiple factors of influence on symptoms in Table 3
), facing problems related to internal medicine, psychology, and urology. However, we strongly discourage misuse of these concepts to treat men indiscriminately who present with vague symptoms that are not at all testosterone deficient.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online August 22, 2006
Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CV, coefficient of variation; LOH, late-onset hypogonadism; LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms; MATeS, Men in Australia Telephone Survey; MMAS, Massachusetts Male Aging Study; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; TT, total testosterone.
Received February 22, 2006.
Accepted August 10, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. E. MacLean, W. S. M. Chiu, C. Ma, J. F. McManus, R. A. Davey, R. Cameron, A. J. Notini, and J. D. Zajac A floxed allele of the androgen receptor gene causes hyperandrogenization in male mice Physiol Genomics, March 10, 2008; 33(1): 133 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Saad, L. J. Gooren, A. Haider, and A. Yassin A Dose-Response Study of Testosterone on Sexual Dysfunction and Features of the Metabolic Syndrome Using Testosterone Gel and Parenteral Testosterone Undecanoate J Androl, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 102 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Araujo, G. R. Esche, V. Kupelian, A. B. O'Donnell, T. G. Travison, R. E. Williams, R. V. Clark, and J. B. McKinlay Prevalence of Symptomatic Androgen Deficiency in Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4241 - 4247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zitzmann and E. Nieschlag Androgen Receptor Gene CAG Repeat Length and Body Mass Index Modulate the Safety of Long-Term Intramuscular Testosterone Undecanoate Therapy in Hypogonadal Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 3844 - 3853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |