help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2005-1882
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/1/79    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strock, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nelkin, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strock, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nelkin, B. D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cancer Chemotherapy
*Thyroid Cancer
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
Right arrow Thyroid
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 1 79-84
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Activity of Irinotecan and the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor CEP-751 in Medullary Thyroid Cancer

Christopher J. Strock, Jong-In Park, D. Marc Rosen, Bruce Ruggeri, Samuel R. Denmeade, Douglas W. Ball and Barry D. Nelkin

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins (C.J.S., J.-I.P., D.M.R., S.R.D., D.W.B., B.D.N.) and Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (D.W.B.), Baltimore, Maryland 21231; and Cephalon, Inc. (B.R.), West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Barry Nelkin, CRB, Room 552, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21231. E-mail: bnelkin{at}jhmi.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a cancer of the parafollicular C cells that commonly presents with an inherited or acquired RET gene mutation. There is currently no effective systemic treatment for MTC.

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate a systemic therapeutic approach to treat MTC. We studied the sensitivity of an MTC cell line and xenograft to irinotecan, alone and in combination with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, CEP-751.

Results: In TT cell culture and xenografts, irinotecan treatment was highly effective. This effect was augmented by treatment with CEP-751. Treatment of TT cell xenografts resulted in durable complete remission in 100% of the mice, with median time to recurrence of 70 d for irinotecan alone and more than 130 d for irinotecan plus CEP-751. Although irinotecan induced an S phase checkpoint arrest in TT cells, CEP-751 in combination with irinotecan resulted in a loss of this arrest. CEP-751 induced a loss in the induction of the DNA repair program marked by phospho-H2AX and the checkpoint pathway marked by the activated Chk1 pathway.

Conclusions: Irinotecan treatment was highly effective in a preclinical model of human MTC, resulting in complete remission in 100% of the xenografts treated. The duration of remission was further enhanced by combination with the kinase inhibitor, CEP-751. These results suggest that irinotecan, alone or in combination, may be useful for the treatment of MTC.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MEDULLARY THYROID CARCINOMA (MTC) is a cancer of the parafollicular C cells of the thyroid that accounts for approximately 5% of all thyroid cancers and a disproportionate number of thyroid cancer deaths (1). Except for surgery, therapy for MTC has been generally ineffective, with 56% of patients having detectable residual MTC after surgery due to the early metastatic nature of this disease (2). Most chemotherapy or radiotherapy protocols have resulted in fewer than 20% objective responses, with rare complete responses (3, 4, 5, 6). The lack of effective systemic therapy and the early metastatic nature of MTC show the importance of developing new approaches to treat this disease.

MTC can be inherited as an autosomal dominant syndrome in about 20% of the cases (7). These inherited forms of MTC occur within three related multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN 2) syndromes: MEN 2A, MEN 2B, and familial MTC (7). The germline genetic defects implicated in the development of the MEN 2 syndromes are mutations resulting in activation of the RET receptor tyrosine kinase (7). RET somatic mutations are detectable in approximately 40% of sporadic MTC, and RET is expressed in virtually all MTC tumors (8). The association of activated RET mutants with MTC and the ability of activated RET to transform cells and transgenic animals make RET an attractive target for possible treatment of MTC (9, 10, 11, 12, 13). Recent reports from this laboratory and others have identified pharmacological inhibitors of RET (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). These inhibitors have been shown to inhibit the growth of MTC cells and RET-transformed fibroblasts in vitro and in vivo, suggesting a potential therapeutic utility in cases of MTC with RET mutations. In addition to therapy targeted to RET, there is a need for systemic therapy for the approximately 50% of sporadic MTC patients whose tumors lack RET mutations.

In this report we show that the topoisomerase I poison, irinotecan, is highly effective against TT cells in culture and TT cell xenografts in a nude mouse model. Irinotecan caused complete remission of the xenograft tumors, with a median duration of response of approximately 70 d. We show that irinotecan causes the cells to arrest in early S phase. We also show that the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, CEP-751, acts additively in culture with irinotecan and results in a loss of S phase checkpoint induction. CEP-751 in combination with irinotecan also caused complete remission of the TT xenografts in a nude mouse model, with five of nine mice apparently cured, with complete remission continuing for more than 130 d. Our results suggest that irinotecan may be an effective treatment for MTC, and this treatment may be improved in combination with CEP-751.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents

Irinotecan was purchased from Pfizer (New York, NY) under the brand name Camptosar. CEP-751 was supplied by Cephalon, Inc. (West Chester, PA), and was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide for cell culture experiments (19, 20). CEP-751 was formulated in a 40% polyethylene glycol 1000, 10% povidone C30, and 2% benzyl alcohol in sterile water for use in nude mouse experiments. The phospho-Chk1 (checkpoint kinase 1) (Ser345) and phospho-cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (phospho-cdk2; Thr160) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (catalog no. 2341 and 2561; Beverly, MA). The cdc25A (cell division cycle 25A) antibody was purchased from Labvision (catalog no. MS-640; Fremont, CA). The phospho-H2AX (histone 2A family member X) and glyceraldehyde-3-phospate dehydrogenase antibodies were purchased from Trevigen (catalog no. 4411-PC and 2275-PC; Gaithersburg, MD). The secondary antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (SC-2004 and SC-2005, Santa Cruz, CA). Phosphatase inhibitor and protease inhibitor cocktails were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (P2850, P5726, and P8340; St. Louis, MO).

Cell culture

The human MTC cell line, TT, is available from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 16% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin in a 37 C incubator with 5% CO2. For cell culture experiments, cells were seeded 48 h before use and treated in normal serum conditions.

Western blotting

Cells were treated for 48 h as described above. They were then washed with PBS and harvested by scraping the cells with 1x sodium dodecyl sulfate lysis buffer [2% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 62.5 mM Tris (pH 6.8)]. Lysates were electrophoresed on 4–20% gradient polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride. Blots were probed at 4 C overnight with primary antibodies diluted 1:1000 in 5% milk, except for phospho-H2AX, which was diluted in 5% calf serum diluted in Tween/Tris-buffered saline. Secondary antibodies were diluted 1:5000, and blots were visualized using Supersignal Pico Chemiluminescence (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL).

Growth curves

Growth curves were performed four times using the 3,4,5-dimethylthiazol-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium (MTT) assay (M2128, Sigma-Aldrich Corp.) as described previously (21). Cells were seeded in 24-well plates using phenol red-free RPMI 1640 with 16% FBS. After 48 h, the medium was replaced with normal serum media (16% FBS) containing irinotecan or CEP-751, alone or in combination, at the appropriate concentrations or with dimethylsulfoxide as a vehicle control. In every experiment, each concentration was used in quadruplicate, and the drug-containing medium was replaced every other day.

Combination index

The interaction between CEP-751 and irinotecan was analyzed in three separate experiments using the combination index method of Chou and Talalay (22) to determine whether the combination was additive or synergistic. Cell viability assays (MTT) were performed in quadruplicate on cells at various concentrations of each drug, alone and in combination, at a fixed ratio.

Cell cycle analysis

TT cells were seeded in six-well plates (106 cells/well) and treated for 48 h with drug in normal serum conditions. Treatment groups were untreated, 5 µM irinotecan, 100 nM CEP-751, and irinotecan plus CEP-751. The cells were trypsinized from the plates, then lysed in Hoechst 33258 staining solution for fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis (0.56% Nonidet P-40, 3.7% formaldehyde, and 11 µg/ml Hoechst 33258 in PBS). The nuclei were analyzed using an LSR Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) gated for single nuclei. The cell cycle profile was determined using 10,000 gated nuclei with CellQuest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences).

In vivo tumor growth in nude mice

TT cells suspended in Matrigel (5 x 106 cells/200 µl) were inoculated sc into the right flank of 4- to 6-wk-old male athymic nude (nu/nu) mice (Harlan Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN). Once palpable, tumors were measured at indicated intervals using Vernier calipers. Tumor volumes were calculated using the formula: length x width x height x (0.5236). After a 2- to 3-wk period, tumors reached approximately 0.1 cc in average size, and animals were sorted into groups of 10 to achieve equal distribution of tumor size in all treatment groups. Treatment groups were made up of mice treated with vehicle control (40% polyethylene glycol 1000, 10% povidone C30, and 2% benzyl alcohol in sterile water), CEP-751 (10 mg/kg mouse/dose), irinotecan (10 mg/kg mouse/dose) plus vehicle control, and irinotecan plus CEP-751. Animals received once daily ip injection of irinotecan for two cycles of 2 wk each, separated by a 1-wk rest period, with each cycle consisting of 5 d treatment on, 2 d off, followed by 5 d on treatment. Animals treated with CEP-751 alone or in combination with irinotecan were treated twice daily with sc injections using the same schedule. At the end of the experiments, animals were killed by CO2 asphyxiation. Statistical analysis of differences in tumor volumes was performed using Student’s t test. All animal studies were performed according to protocols approved by the Johns Hopkins Animal Care and Use Committee.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Irinotecan inhibits the growth of the MTC cell line, TT, in vitro

We evaluated the activity of irinotecan against the human MTC cell line, TT. The TT cell line was derived from an apparently sporadic case of MTC harboring a C634W-activating mutation in the RET receptor tyrosine kinase gene (23). In numerous studies, the TT cell line has been shown to reflect the resistance of MTC to chemotherapy and radiation (24, 25, 26, 27). TT cells were treated with irinotecan, and growth was evaluated by MTT assay over a 2-d period. Figure 1Go shows that irinotecan inhibited the growth of TT cells even at the lowest concentration of 200 nM and caused significant cytotoxicity at doses greater than 500 nM. The calculated IC50 was determined to be 2 µM. This activity suggests that TT cells are sensitive to inhibition by topoisomerase I.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Growth curves of TT cells treated with irinotecan. MTT assay was performed on TT cells treated with irinotecan at various concentrations. OD540 readings taken at 24 and 48 h, with each data point representing the average of four wells in a 24-well plate.

 
Effect of irinotecan is increased by addition of the RET inhibitor, CEP-751

In some tumor types, the inhibition of receptor tyrosine kinases or their downstream signal transduction pathways can augment the effects of irinotecan and other chemotherapeutic agents (28). We have previously shown that the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, CEP-701 and CEP-751, target RET and inhibit the growth of TT cells (19). Therefore, we explored the effects of the combination of irinotecan and CEP-751. Figure 2AGo shows TT cells treated for 48 h with irinotecan at 1 or 5 µM in the presence or absence of 100 nM CEP-751 in normal 16% FBS medium. There was a significant degree of cell death with 5 µM irinotecan treatment of the TT cells, but at 1 µM irinotecan, the cells showed a slightly flatter morphology, with minimal cell death. The growth curve demonstrated that 5 µM irinotecan was cytotoxic, whereas 1 µM irinotecan was cytostatic (Fig. 2BGo). CEP-751-treated cells showed a cytostatic effect, with some cell death (Fig. 2Go, A and B), consistent with previous results obtained in this laboratory (19). Addition of 100 nM CEP-751 to 1 µM irinotecan resulted in a significant increase in cell death over that using either agent alone. The combination of 1 µM irinotecan and 100 nM CEP-751 resulted in cell death comparable to that of the 5 µM irinotecan-treated cells (Fig. 2Go, A and B). When 100 nM CEP-751 was combined with 5 µM irinotecan, there was a minimal increase in cell death over that with irinotecan alone due to the effectiveness of irinotecan alone at this dose (Fig. 2Go, A and B).



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Irinotecan cooperates with RET inhibitors to induce cell death. A, Cells were treated for 24 h with the reagents shown. B, Growth curve using MTT assay. Results show that CEP-751 acts cooperatively with irinotecan to induce cell death. C, Combination index (CI) plots of interaction between irinotecan and CEP-751. Cells were treated with CEP-751, irinotecan, or irinotecan plus CEP-751 at set ratios from the IC50. Fa, Fractional lethality of each drug. A CI of 1 means the drugs are additive. These results show an additive effect.

 
These results led us to examine the interaction of irinotecan and CEP-751 using the combination index method of Chou and Talalay (22). When the cells were treated with a combination of irinotecan and CEP-751, there was a significant increase in growth inhibitory activity compared with that after treatment with either alone, leading to an apparent additive effect of the two drugs, as demonstrated in the combination index plot (Fig. 2CGo).

Irinotecan treatment is effective against TT xenografts, and this activity is augmented by CEP-751

After determining the effectiveness of these drugs against TT cells in vitro, we examined their activity in a nude mouse model. Mice bearing palpable sc TT xenograft tumors were treated for 5 d/wk for 2 wk, rested for 1 wk, and then treatment was repeated for another 2-wk cycle. Thus, the treatment was completed on d 33. Irinotecan was administered by ip injection of 10 mg/kg·d. CEP-751 was administered at 10 mg/kg by sc injection twice daily. The mice tolerated the treatments well, with only minimal transient weight loss observed. Dramatically, 100% of TT cell xenografts treated with either irinotecan alone or irinotecan plus CEP-751 responded with complete remission (Fig. 3AGo). The group treated with irinotecan alone had a median duration of remission of 70 d. The effect of irinotecan was significant vs. the control mice for each of these irinotecan-treated groups (P < 0.0001). Treatment with a combination of irinotecan and CEP-751 extended the duration of complete remission to a median of more than 130 d (P < 0.0001 vs. irinotecan alone; Fig. 3BGo). Indeed, in five of the nine mice in this group, the tumor never recurred and was undetectable upon killing the animal and autopsy on d 160. In contrast, the tumors in untreated mice and mice treated with CEP-751 progressed during the same time period (Fig. 3AGo). This result shows that irinotecan alone is very effective against TT tumors, and that the inhibition with CEP-751 in combination with this treatment can further increase the efficacy of irinotecan in this xenograft model. These complete responses to irinotecan in this in vivo model of MTC are especially notable, because this model has been resistant to therapy, with few reports of any objective responses (25, 26, 27).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. CEP-751 increases irinotecan activity in TT xenografts. A, TT xenografts were grown in the flank of nude mice to an average size of about 0.1 ml. The mice were injected in the opposite flank with vehicle or CEP-751 sc twice a day, 5 d/wk, for two cycles of 2 wk each. Irinotecan was injected ip once a day, 5 d/wk, for two cycles of 2 wk each. {blacksquare}, Treatment cycles. Tumors were measured at the time points shown and are the averages of all of tumors in the group. B, Kaplan-Meier curve showing time to progression of TT xenografts to a 4-fold size cutoff from their initial size on d 0.

 
Cell cycle analysis

To explore the mechanism underlying the additive effects of CEP-751 and irinotecan, we performed cell cycle analysis using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Irinotecan, as a topoisomerase I poison, induces double-stranded DNA breaks in a largely DNA replication-dependent manner. Figure 4AGo shows the cell cycle analysis of TT cells treated with 5 µM irinotecan for 48 h. A dramatic increase in the proportion of cells accumulating in early S phase was observed, similar to the effect of irinotecan in other cell types (29). Treatment with CEP-751 alone resulted in the accumulation of cells in G2/M, as shown previously (19). When CEP-751 was added in combination with 5 µM irinotecan, the cell cycle profile was significantly changed from that when either of the compounds used alone. The cells no longer accumulated in early S phase or G2/M, as seen with either compound alone. Instead, the cells now exhibited a cell cycle profile much more similar to the normal untreated TT cells. This result suggests that CEP-751 acts to block the early S phase arrest that occurs in TT cells treated with irinotecan alone, thus allowing the cells to continue through the cell cycle while accumulating DNA damage. We suspected, therefore, that CEP-751 acts to block the normal checkpoints induced upon DNA damage with irinotecan. Interestingly, there did not seem to be any significant induction of classic apoptotic cells in any of the treated cells, as determined by a sub-G0 peak, suggesting the possibility of an alternative mechanism for cell death. This lack of apoptosis is also supported by a lack of cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (data not shown).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Irinotecan causes S phase checkpoint and Chk1 pathway induction, which is blocked by CEP-751. A, TT cells were harvested 24 h after treatment with 100 nM CEP-751, 5 µM irinotecan, and 100 nM CEP-751 plus 5 µM irinotecan. Nuclei were then stained with Hoechst 33258 for cell cycle analysis. B, TT cells were treated for 48 h with the drugs indicated in RPMI 1640 with 16% FBS. Each lane contains 30 µg total protein. Irinotecan induces {gamma}H2AX induction in response to DNA damage, whereas CEP-751 blocks some of this induction. The Chk1 pathway is also induced by irinotecan treatment, and this is also blocked by CEP-751 treatment.

 
H2AX, Chk1, and cdc25A pathways are involved in the irinotecan-induced S phase checkpoint

Previous reports have shown that double-strand breaks of DNA induced by irinotecan treatment result in a DNA repair pathway marked by phosphorylation of histone H2AX (30). In this study we show that TT cells treated with irinotecan exhibit increased phosphorylation of histone H2AX, and this phosphorylation was significantly inhibited when the cells were treated with irinotecan in the presence of CEP-751 (Fig. 4BGo). Previous reports have also shown activation of Chk1 by phosphorylation in response to irinotecan-mediated DNA damage (31). We show that irinotecan treatment resulted in increased Chk1 phosphorylation in TT cells, and that this activation is also blocked when the cells are treated with irinotecan in the presence of CEP-751 (Fig. 4BGo). One of the effects of Chk1 is an S phase block is phosphorylation of cdc25A, resulting in its degradation (29). Cdc25A is a phosphatase that promotes the activation of cdk2. In this study we show that cdc25A is degraded in response to irinotecan treatment, as would be expected in a cdk2-dependent S phase block (Fig. 4BGo). CEP-751 in combination with irinotecan also acts to block this degradation (Fig. 4BGo), possibly resulting in a release of the S phase arrest shown in Fig. 4AGo. Cdk2 is phosphorylated on Thr160, and this effect is also blocked by CEP-751. These results are consistent with involvement of chk1, cdc25A, and H2AX in the S phase checkpoint induction and suggest that CEP-751 may act to block this checkpoint. CEP-751 is an effective RET inhibitor (IC50, ~200 nM) (19), but like most tyrosine kinase inhibitors, CEP-751 also inhibits other kinases, including FLT3, TrkA, and KDR (20, 32, 33). Therefore, it is possible that CEP-751 may affect the S phase checkpoint through kinase activities other than RET. To determine whether the effect on these DNA damage checkpoint proteins is dependent on RET inhibition, cell lines that do not express RET were treated with irinotecan and CEP-751. Indeed, in the colon cancer cell line, HCT-116, and the nonsmall cell lung cancer cell line, H1299, CEP-751 blocked irinotecan-induced chk1 phosphorylation (data not shown). Together, these results support the possibility that inhibition of another, as yet unidentified, kinase may help to sensitize these cells to irinotecan treatment by allowing progression through cell cycle checkpoints without repair of DNA damage.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The identification of oncogenic RET as an activated oncogene in MTC has created significant interest in the development of RET inhibitors for treatment of this disease. Several promising methods for inhibiting RET have been reported, including the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, HSP90 chaperone inhibitors, and gene therapy (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). Some of these inhibitors have entered clinical trials. Nevertheless, the targeting of RET may not be an effective strategy for the approximately 60% of sporadic MTC cases that do not harbor an activating RET mutation. Because irinotecan does not target RET, it may be especially important as a potential therapeutic agent for cases of MTC without RET mutations. Results recently published showing the sensitivity of newly established MTC cell lines to camptothecin in cell culture suggest that sensitivity to topoisomerase I poisons may be common in MTC (34).

The mechanism by which CEP-751 sensitizes MTC cells to irinotecan is not certain. However, because inhibition of receptor tyrosine kinase targets in other cancers can also sensitize cells to irinotecan, this suggests that a common mechanism may be widely used in cancer (28, 35). In other cell lines, irinotecan treatment of cells has been shown to induce an S phase or G2/M checkpoint (31, 36). Activation of the S phase checkpoint is mediated by the ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated)- and Rad3-related (ATR) checkpoint pathway and its downstream effectors, such as H2AX, Chk1, cdc25A, and cdk2 (30, 36), allowing damage to be repaired before completion of cell division. We showed that CEP-751 interferes with the induction of the S phase checkpoint, potentially preventing DNA repair before completion of cell division. Our data suggest that this blocking of checkpoint induction may be mediated through the ATM/ATR pathway, because downstream effectors of the ATM/ATR pathway, Chk1 and cdc25A, are affected by CEP-751. The mechanism by which the ATM/ATR signaling pathway is blocked is as yet unknown, but the determination of such connections could be extremely beneficial in our understanding of this disease as well as the mechanisms of resistance to radiation and chemotherapy in this cancer model. In addition to the interaction with the checkpoint pathways, CEP-751 inhibition of RET or other tyrosine kinases could also modulate cellular sensitivity through other pathways. For example, RET has been shown to induce nuclear factor-{kappa}B and Akt, which can activate cell survival signaling pathways (37, 38). It is also possible that inhibition of RET and other kinases may activate an ABC cellular transport mechanism; such a mechanism has been reported recently for EGFR inhibition by Iressa in pediatric tumor cell lines (39).

Irinotecan is already approved for clinical use in metastatic colorectal cancer, either as a combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for the first-line therapy or as a monotherapy for relapse after 5-fluorouracil treatment (40). In colorectal tumor cell lines, the IC50 of irinotecan has been reported to be between 2.5 and greater than 20 µM (41). In our MTC cell line, the IC50 is even lower at 2 µM, suggesting that MTC may be at least as sensitive as colorectal cancer to irinotecan. In light of the preclinical results reported in this paper, a phase II clinical trial of irinotecan for advanced MTC has been initiated. The implications of the results of the combination treatment also suggest the potential for possible future clinical utility of a combination of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and irinotecan for treatment of MTC.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Leslie Meszler at the Johns Hopkins Oncology Center Cell Imaging Core Facility.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by NIH SPORE (Specialized Programs of Research Excellence) in Head and Neck Cancer Grant CA-96784 and the Team Rachel Fund.

First Published Online November 1, 2005

Abbreviations: ATM, Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated; ATR, ATM- and Rad3-related; cdk2, cyclin-dependent kinase 2; Chk1, checkpoint kinase 1; FBS, fetal bovine serum; MEN 2, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2; MTC, medullary thyroid cancer; MTT, 3,4,5-dimethylthiazol-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium.

Received August 22, 2005.

Accepted October 20, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Hundahl SA, Fleming ID, Fremgen AM, Menck HR 1998 A National Cancer Data Base report on 53,856 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the U.S., 1985–1995. Cancer 83:2638–2648[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Evans DB, Fleming JB, Lee JE, Cote G, Gagel RF 1999 The surgical treatment of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Semin Surg Oncol 16:50–63[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Petursson SR 1988 Metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Complete response to combination chemotherapy with dacarbazine and 5-fluorouracil. Cancer 62:1899–1903[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Samaan NA, Schultz PN, Hickey RC 1988 Medullary thyroid carcinoma: prognosis of familial versus sporadic disease and the role of radiotherapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:801–805[Abstract]
  5. Brierley J, Tsang R, Simpson WJ, Gospodarowicz M, Sutcliffe S, Panzarella T 1996 Medullary thyroid cancer: analyses of survival and prognostic factors and the role of radiation therapy in local control. Thyroid 6:305–310[Medline]
  6. Wu LT, Averbuch SD, Ball DW, de Bustros A, Baylin SB, McGuire III WP 1994 Treatment of advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma with a combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dacarbazine. Cancer 73:432–436[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Ponder BAJ 2001 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The metabolic, molecular basis of inherited disease, 8th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 931–942
  8. Wohllk N, Cote GJ, Bugalho MM, Ordonez N, Evans DB, Goepfert H, Khorana S, Schultz P, Richards CS, Gagel RF 1996 Relevance of RET proto-oncogene mutations in sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3740–3745[Abstract]
  9. Santoro M, Carlomagno F, Romano A, Bottaro DP, Dathan NA, Grieco M, Fusco A, Vecchio G, Matoskova B, Kraus MH, Di Fiore PP 1995 Activation of RET as a dominant transforming gene by germline mutations of MEN2A and MEN2B. Science 267:381–383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Asai N, Iwashita T, Matsuyama M, Takahashi M 1995 Mechanism of activation of the ret proto-oncogene by multiple endocrine neoplasia 2A mutations. Mol Cell Biol 15:1613–1619[Abstract]
  11. Michiels FM, Chappuis S, Caillou B, Pasini A, Talbot M, Monier R, Lenoir GM, Feunteun J, Billaud M 1997 Development of medullary thyroid carcinoma in transgenic mice expressing the RET protooncogene altered by a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:3330–3335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Acton DS, Velthuyzen D, Lips CJ, Hoppener JW 2000 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B mutation in human RET oncogene induces medullary thyroid carcinoma in transgenic mice. Oncogene 19:3121–3125[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kawai K, Iwashita T, Murakami H, Hiraiwa N, Yoshiki A, Kusakabe M, Ono K, Iida K, Nakayama A, Takahashi M 2000 Tissue-specific carcinogenesis in transgenic mice expressing the RET proto-oncogene with a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A mutation. Cancer Res 60:5254–5260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Carlomagno F, Vitagliano D, Guida T, Ciardiello F, Tortora G, Vecchio G, Ryan AJ, Fontanini G, Fusco A, Santoro M 2002 ZD6474, an orally available inhibitor of KDR tyrosine kinase activity, efficiently blocks oncogenic RET kinases. Cancer Res 62:7284–7290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lanzi C, Cassinelli G, Pensa T, Cassinis M, Gambetta RA, Borrello MG, Menta E, Pierotti MA, Zunino F 2000 Inhibition of transforming activity of the ret/ptc1 oncoprotein by a 2-indolinone derivative. Int J Cancer 85:384–390[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Cohen MS, Hussain HB, Moley JF 2002 Inhibition of medullary thyroid carcinoma cell proliferation and RET phosphorylation by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Surgery 132:960–967[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Cassinelli G, Lanzi C, Pensa T, Gambetta RA, Nasini G, Cuccuru G, Cassinis M, Pratesi G, Polizzi D, Tortoreto M, Zunino F 2000 Clavilactones, a novel class of tyrosine kinase inhibitors of fungal origin. Biochem Pharmacol 59:1539–1547[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Carlomagno F, Vitagliano D, Guida T, Napolitano M, Vecchio G, Fusco A, Gazit A, Levitzki A, Santoro M 2002 The kinase inhibitor PP1 blocks tumorigenesis induced by RET oncogenes. Cancer Res 62:1077–1082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Strock CJ, Park JI, Rosen M, Dionne C, Ruggeri B, Jones-Bolin S, Denmeade SR, Ball DW, Nelkin BD 2003 CEP-701 and CEP-751 inhibit constitutively activated RET tyrosine kinase activity and block medullary thyroid carcinoma cell growth. Cancer Res 63:5559–5563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Camoratto AM, Jani JP, Angeles TS, Maroney AC, Sanders CY, Murakata C, Neff NT, Vaught JL, Isaacs JT, Dionne CA 1997 CEP-751 inhibits TRK receptor tyrosine kinase activity in vitro and exhibits anti-tumor activity. Int J Cancer 72:673–679[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Sriuranpong V, Borges MW, Ravi RK, Arnold DR, Nelkin BD, Baylin SB, Ball DW 2001 Notch signaling induces cell cycle arrest in small cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Res 61:3200–3205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Chou TC, Talalay P 1984 Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul 22:27–55[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Carlomagno F, Salvatore D, Santoro M, de Franciscis V, Quadro L, Panariello L, Colantuoni V, Fusco A 1995 Point mutation of the RET proto-oncogene in the TT human medullary thyroid carcinoma cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 207:1022–1028[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Massart C, Gibassier J, Denais A, Genetet N 1998 Effect of PSC 833 on the efficacy of doxorubicin in vitro in a medullary thyroid carcinoma cell line. Anticancer Res 18:2953–2956[Medline]
  25. Behr TM, Wulst E, Radetzky S, Blumenthal RD, Dunn RM, Gratz S, Rave-Frank M, Schmidberger H, Raue F, Becker W 1997 Improved treatment of medullary thyroid cancer in a nude mouse model by combined radioimmunochemotherapy: doxorubicin potentiates the therapeutic efficacy of radiolabeled antibodies in a radioresistant tumor type. Cancer Res 57:5309–5319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Stein R, Chen S, Reed L, Richel H, Goldenberg DM 2002 Combining radioimmunotherapy and chemotherapy for treatment of medullary thyroid carcinoma: effectiveness of dacarbazine. Cancer 94:51–61[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Kraeber-Bodere F, Sai-Maurel C, Campion L, Faivre-Chauvet A, Mirallie E, Cherel M, Supiot S, Barbet J, Chatal JF, Thedrez P 2002 Enhanced antitumor activity of combined pretargeted radioimmunotherapy and paclitaxel in medullary thyroid cancer xenograft. Mol Cancer Ther 1:267–274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Koizumi F, Kanzawa F, Ueda Y, Koh Y, Tsukiyama S, Taguchi F, Tamura T, Saijo N, Nishio K 2004 Synergistic interaction between the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib ("Iressa") and the DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor CPT-11 (irinotecan) in human colorectal cancer cells. Int J Cancer 108:464–472[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Xiao Z, Chen Z, Gunasekera AH, Sowin TJ, Rosenberg SH, Fesik S, Zhang H 2003 Chk1 mediates S and G2 arrests through Cdc25A degradation in response to DNA-damaging agents. J Biol Chem 278:21767–21773[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Thiriet C, Hayes JJ 2005 Chromatin in need of a fix: phosphorylation of H2AX connects chromatin to DNA repair. Mol Cell 18:617–622[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Pommier Y, Redon C, Rao VA, Seiler JA, Sordet O, Takemura H, Antony S, Meng L, Liao Z, Kohlhagen G, Zhang H, Kohn KW 2003 Repair of and checkpoint response to topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage. Mutat Res 532:173–203[Medline]
  32. Levis M, Allebach J, Tse KF, Zheng R, Baldwin BR, Smith BD, Jones-Bolin S, Ruggeri B, Dionne C, Small D 2002 A FLT3-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor is cytotoxic to leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo. Blood 99:3885–3891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. George DJ, Dionne CA, Jani J, Angeles T, Murakata C, Lamb J, Isaacs JT 1999 Sustained in vivo regression of Dunning H rat prostate cancers treated with combinations of androgen ablation and Trk tyrosine kinase inhibitors, CEP-751 (KT-6587) or CEP-701 (KT-5555). Cancer Res 59:2395–2401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kaczirek K, Schindl M, Weinhausel A, Scheuba C, Passler C, Prager G, Raderer M, Hamilton G, Mittlbock M, Siegl V, Pfragner R, Niederle B 2004 Cytotoxic activity of camptothecin and paclitaxel in newly established continuous human medullary thyroid carcinoma cell lines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2397–2401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Shao RG, Cao CX, Shimizu T, O’Connor PM, Kohn KW, Pommier Y 1997 Abrogation of an S-phase checkpoint and potentiation of camptothecin cytotoxicity by 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) in human cancer cell lines, possibly influenced by p53 function. Cancer Res 57:4029–4035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Flatten K, Dai NT, Vroman BT, Loegering D, Erlichman C, Karnitz LM, Kaufmann SH 2005 The role of checkpoint kinase 1 in sensitivity to topoisomerase I poisons. J Biol Chem 280:14349–14355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Ludwig L, Kessler H, Wagner M, Hoang-Vu C, Dralle H, Adler G, Bohm BO, Schmid RM 2001 Nuclear factor-{kappa}B is constitutively active in C-cell carcinoma and required for RET-induced transformation. Cancer Res 61:4526–4535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Segouffin-Cariou C, Billaud M 2000 Transforming ability of MEN2A-RET requires activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 275:3568–3576[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Stewart CF, Leggas M, Schuetz JD, Panetta JC, Cheshire PJ, Peterson J, Daw N, Jenkins III JJ, Gilbertson R, Germain GS, Harwood FC, Houghton PJ 2004 Gefitinib enhances the antitumor activity and oral bioavailability of irinotecan in mice. Cancer Res 64:7491–7499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, Rosen LS, Fehrenbacher L, Moore MJ, Maroun JA, Ackland SP, Locker PK, Pirotta N, Elfring GL, Miller LL 2000 Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:905–914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Jansen WJ, Zwart B, Hulscher ST, Giaccone G, Pinedo HM, Boven E 1997 CPT-11 in human colon-cancer cell lines and xenografts: characterization of cellular sensitivity determinants. Int J Cancer 70:335–340[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A. Chrisoulidou, G. Kaltsas, I. Ilias, and A. B Grossman
The diagnosis and management of malignant phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 569 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
K. Frank-Raue, M. Fabel, S. Delorme, U. Haberkorn, and F. Raue
Efficacy of imatinib mesylate in advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2007; 157(2): 215 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
K. A. B. Knostman, S. M. Jhiang, and C. C. Capen
Genetic Alterations in Thyroid Cancer: The Role of Mouse Models
Vet. Pathol., January 1, 2007; 44(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/1/79    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strock, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nelkin, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strock, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nelkin, B. D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cancer Chemotherapy
*Thyroid Cancer
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
Right arrow Thyroid


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals