help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0265
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Torpy, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Torpy, D. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*COSYNTROPIN
*HYDROCORTISONE
Medline Plus Health Information
*Sepsis
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 1 105-114
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Septic Shock and Sepsis: A Comparison of Total and Free Plasma Cortisol Levels

J. T. Ho, H. Al-Musalhi, M. J. Chapman, T. Quach, P. D. Thomas, C. J. Bagley, J. G. Lewis and D. J. Torpy

Hanson Institute (J.T.H., H.A.-M., C.J.B., D.J.T.), The University of Adelaide (J.T.H., H.A.-M., C.J.B., D.J.T.), and the Endocrine and Metabolic (J.T.H., H.A.-M., T.Q., D.J.T.) and Intensive Care Unit (M.J.C., P.D.T.), Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; and Canterbury Health Laboratories (J.G.L.), Christchurch, New Zealand

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Jui Ho, Endocrine and Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia. E-mail: Jui.Ho{at}imvs.sa.gov.au.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Severe systemic infection leads to hypercortisolism. Reduced cortisol binding proteins may accentuate the free cortisol elevations seen in systemic infection. Recently, low total cortisol increments after tetracosactrin have been associated with increased mortality and hemodynamic responsiveness to exogenous hydrocortisone in septic shock (SS), a phenomenon termed by some investigators as relative adrenal insufficiency (RAI).

Hypothesis: Free plasma cortisol may correspond more closely to illness severity than total cortisol, comparing SS and sepsis (S).

Design: This was a prospective study.

Setting: This study took place in a tertiary teaching hospital.

Patients: Patients had SS (n = 45) or S (n = 19) or were healthy controls (HCs; n = 10).

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare total with free cortisol, measured directly and estimated by Coolens’ method, corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), and albumin in patients with SS (with and without RAI) and S during acute illness, recovery, and convalescence.

Results: Comparing SS, S, and HC subjects, free cortisol levels reflected illness severity more closely than total cortisol (basal free cortisol, SS, 186 vs. S, 29 vs. HC, 13 nmol/liter, P < 0.001 compared with basal total cortisol, SS, 880 vs. S, 417 vs. HC, 352 nmol/liter, P < 0.001). Stimulated free cortisol increments varied greatly with illness category (SS, 192 vs. S, 115 vs. HC, 59 nmol/liter, P = 0.004), whereas total cortisol increments did not (SS, 474 vs. S, 576 vs. HC, 524 nmol/liter, P = 0.013). The lack of increase in total cortisol with illness severity is due to lower CBG and albumin. One third of patients with SS (15 of 45) but no S patients met a recently described criterion for RAI (total cortisol increment after tetracosactrin ≤ 248 nmol/liter). RAI patients had higher basal total cortisol (1157 vs. 756 nmol/liter; P = 0.028) and basal free cortisol (287 vs. 140 nmol/liter; P = 0.017) than non-RAI patients. Mean cortisol increments in RAI were lower (total, 99 vs. 648 nmol/liter, P < 0.001; free, 59 vs. 252 nmol/liter, P < 0.001). These differences were not due to altered CBG or albumin levels. Free cortisol levels normalized more promptly than total cortisol in convalescence. Calculated free cortisol by Coolens’ method compared closely with measured free cortisol.

Conclusions: Free cortisol is likely to be a better guide to cortisolemia in systemic infection because it corresponds more closely to illness severity. The attenuated cortisol increment after tetracosactrin in RAI is not due to low cortisol-binding proteins. Free cortisol levels can be determined reliably using total cortisol and CBG levels.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
SEPTIC SHOCK (SS) is defined as sepsis (S) from a microbial infection resulting in a systemic inflammatory response with severe hypotension. Despite catecholaminergic vasopressors and antimicrobial agents, mortality remains around 50%. Randomized controlled trials and a metaanalysis of short-term, high-dose methylprednisolone or dexamethasone in SS showed lack of efficacy (1, 2). However, several studies published after 1997 established that stress doses of hydrocortisone (200–300 mg/d) improved hemodynamic parameters and reduced the duration of vasopressor support (3, 4, 5).

Relative adrenal insufficiency (RAI) is conceptually defined by some investigators as an inadequate cortisol response to severe illness associated with rapid clinical and hemodynamic improvement after stress-dose glucocorticoid therapy (6, 7, 8, 9, 10). High plasma cortisol levels and blunted cortisol responses to corticotropin stimulation are linked to higher mortality in SS (9, 10, 11, 12, 13). A multicenter, randomized, prospective study in SS patients showed that the use of stress-dose corticosteroids significantly improved 28-d survival and facilitated withdrawal of vasopressor support in patients with RAI (defined here by a cortisol increment of 248 nmol/liter or less, i.e. {Delta} ≤ 248) but not in patients without RAI (14).

Despite these data, there is currently no consensus on diagnostic criteria or indications for treatment for RAI. Furthermore, the total cortisol increment after ACTH may not be the best guide to RAI because of reduced corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) and albumin levels. CBG and albumin transport over 90% of the circulating cortisol under normal circadian conditions (15, 16). In critical illness, mean CBG and albumin levels fall by around 50% but with marked interindividual variation. Hence, total cortisol may not reflect the biologically active free (unbound) cortisol. Indeed, a recent study found that baseline and ACTH-stimulated cortisol levels in a heterogeneous group of critically ill patients (n = 66) were lower in the subgroup with hypoalbuminemia (albumin < 2.5 g/dl, n = 36). However, free cortisol levels were similar in the hypoalbuminemic and normoalbuminemic groups (17). Our study was directed toward comparing basal and stimulated free and total cortisol levels, specifically in S and SS.

Although hydrocortisone treatment appears beneficial in a study of severe pneumonia-induced S, no cortisol data were available (18). Hence, we examined the rates of RAI, by one empiric definition, in our subjects with S.

The Coolens’ method may be practically useful in critical illness because it estimates free cortisol levels from total cortisol and CBG levels (15). If reliable in SS, use of Coolens’ method would obviate the need for complex nonautomated methods of free cortisol measurement such as ultracentrifugation or equilibrium dialysis. However, the method has not been validated in SS, and such validation was one objective of this study.

Our principal hypothesis was that the free cortisol would be higher than total cortisol in SS than S. Hence, free cortisol may be a better measure of circulating glucocorticoid activity. Our aims were: 1) to compare total and free plasma cortisol levels under basal and tetracosactrin-stimulated conditions, in patients with SS (with and without currently defined RAI), S, and in healthy controls (HCs); 2) to determine the rates of recovery of RAI in survivors; and 3) to evaluate the use of the Coolens’ method, a calculated free cortisol based on total cortisol and CBG concentrations, in estimating free cortisol in SS.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This prospective study was conducted between April 2004 and January 2005 in the Intensive Care Unit and Endocrine Test Unit of the Royal Adelaide Hospital. The study protocol was approved by the Royal Adelaide Hospital Ethics Committee, and informed consent was obtained from each patient or their next-of-kin for follow-up testing and/or analysis of initial basal/stimulated cortisol levels. The study did not alter therapy, and each patient’s clinical care was determined by their own physician.

Patients and volunteers

Definitions of SS and S followed the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference Committee criteria (19). SS was defined as the presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, documented infection or positive blood culture and organ dysfunction, hypoperfusion abnormality or S-induced hypotension refractory to adequate fluid resuscitation, or the use of inotropic or vasopressor support. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome is manifested by two or more of the following: fever (temperature > 38 C) or hypothermia (temperature < 35.5 C), tachycardia (>90 beats/min), tachypnea (>20 breaths/min), leucocytosis or leucopenia (white blood cell count > 12,000 or <4000 cells/µl), or immature neutrophils (bands > 10%). The criteria for organ dysfunction or hypoperfusion abnormality included one of the following: altered mental status, hypoxemia (PaO2 < 75 mm Hg), oliguria (urine output < 30ml/h), or elevated plasma lactate level (>2 mmol/liter). The definition of hypotension was: systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg or a reduction in systolic blood pressure of 40 mm Hg or more from baseline.

SS patients who met the entry criteria were recruited from ICU. S patients were recruited from general wards after referral from their physician. Tetracosactrin tests were performed while patients still met the diagnostic criteria for S, within 24 h of diagnosis. HCs were recruited by advertisement for the tetracosactrin stimulation test.

Exclusion criteria included: age under 18 yr, pregnancy, irreversible underlying disease such as advanced malignancy or AIDS, or conditions known to disrupt the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis such as the use of glucocorticoids and preexisting hypocortisolism. Patients with cirrhosis, pulmonary embolism, and acute myocardial infarction were excluded.

Tetracosactrin (ACTH 1–24) stimulation tests

Blood samples were collected immediately before iv tetracosactrin (250 µg ACTH 1–24, Synacthen, Novartis, North Ryde, NSW, Australia) and at 30 and 60 min postinjection. Surviving patients were offered a second ACTH stimulation test performed within 48 h of hospital discharge and a third ACTH stimulation test 6–12 wk after the second test. Follow-up ACTH stimulation tests were not performed in the control subjects.

Clinical evaluation

Information relating to: 1) age and gender, 2) infection site(s) and organisms, 3) severity of illness at baseline using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system, 4) disease outcome including mortality, 5) use of hydrocortisone, and 6) time to discontinuation of vasopressor support was collected.

Laboratory measurements

Free cortisol was measured by an ultrafiltration/ligand binding method. Plasma (0.5 ml) was equilibrated with 3H cortisol (0.1 µCi, TRK 407, GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) for 30 min at 37 C followed by centrifugation in a preconditioned ultrafiltration device (UFC3LGC00, Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA) at 10,000 x g for 10 min at 37 C. Comparison of the ultrafiltrate radioactive counts (50 µl) with the equilibrated noncentrifuged plasma radioactivity (50 µl) determined the percent free cortisol. Radioactivity was counted in 2 ml of xylene-based scintillant (PCS II, GE Healthcare). The recovery of radioactivity was 100%. There was no adsorption of 3H cortisol to either the filter or the polypropylene used in the filter device and carrier tube.

Validation of the ligand binding assay against equilibrium dialysis method was performed using samples from 19 SS patients and 10 samples from normal individuals. For each sample, 1 ml plasma was dialyzed against 250 µl phosphate buffer solution using an Eppendorf tube device with a presoaked dialysis membrane (6–8000 molecular weight cutoff) for 18 h at 37 C. The total and postdialysis samples were analyzed by plasma direct ELISA.

Calculated free cortisol was derived using the Coolens’ equation: U2 x K (1 + N) + U[1 + N + K(G – T)] – T = 0, where T is cortisol, G is CBG, U is unbound cortisol, and K is the affinity of CBG for cortisol at 37 C (15). N is the ratio of albumin bound to free cortisol, and 1.74 is the value conventionally used. The value of N would be expected to change with altered concentrations of plasma albumin, as observed in SS. We addressed this by investigating the distribution of cortisol (600 nmol/liter) in varying concentrations of purified human serum albumin solutions (Sigma A-9511, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) using equilibrium dialysis. We used these experimentally derived values of N to further calculate free cortisol, thus compensating for variations in plasma albumin.

Plasma total cortisol was measured by enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (AxSYM Cortisol assay kit, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL). The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 5 and 6.5%, respectively. Plasma CBG was measured by a monoclonal ELISA as previously described (20). Within- and between-assay variations were 5–12%, and the assay has a lower limit of detection of 50 nmol/liter. Plasma albumin was measured using the dye binding method with Bromocresol Purple (Integrated Sciences, Willoughby, NSW, Australia) and was quantitatively determined on an Olympus AU5400 analyzer.

Statistical analysis

The plasma cortisol increment was defined as the difference between the basal cortisol and the highest concentration after tetracosactrin. Descriptive statistics were reported as mean ± SE. The data from the three groups (SS, S, and control) were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks to investigate group effects, time effects, and group by time interaction. RAI was empirically defined using the currently most validated criterion, that of Annane et al. (2). The RAI ({Delta} ≤ 248) and non-RAI ({Delta} > 248) groups were compared using nonparametric (Mann-Whitney rank sum test) analysis. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistica software package (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Eighty-four patients were screened, and 64 were enrolled. Principal exclusions were the current use of glucocorticoid therapy, cirrhosis, and malignancy. There were 45 SS patients, 19 with S and 10 HCs. The clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1Go. Control subjects were younger than patients, and more males than females were tested in the S group. Follow-up tetracosactrin stimulation tests were performed in 20 SS and 14 S patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Clinical characteristics of patients with SS, S, and the healthy controls

 
Comparison of total and free cortisol, CBG, and albumin levels: SS, S, and controls

Free cortisol levels corresponded more closely to illness severity than total cortisol (Fig. 1Go). Basal free cortisol levels were: SS, 186 ± 24 vs. S, 29 ± 5 vs. HC, 13 ± 2 nmol/liter; i.e. a 6.4-fold difference. SS vs. S (P < 0.001) and basal total cortisol levels were: SS, 880 ± 79 vs. S, 417 ± 45 vs. HC, 352 ± 34 nmol/liter, a 2.1-fold difference, SS vs. S (P < 0.001). A similar pattern was evident with cortisol increments after tetracosactrin; free cortisol levels were: SS, 192 ± 36 vs. S, 115 ± 12 vs. HC, 59 ± 7 nmol/liter (P = 0.004); and total cortisol increments were: SS, 474 ± 79 vs. S, 576 ± 36 vs. HC, 524 ± 54 nmol/liter (P = 0.013). Higher free cortisol with illness severity may be due to lower levels of cortisol binding proteins (Fig. 1Go). S patients had 35% lower CBG and 29% lower albumin levels than controls, and SS was associated with a further 19% fall in CBG and a 29% fall in albumin levels compared with the S group (Fig. 1Go). CBG levels were: SS, 335 ± 17 vs. S, 412 ± 40 vs. HC, 633 ± 43 nmol/liter (P < 0.001); and albumin levels were: SS, 19 ± 1; S, 27 ± 1; and HC, 38 ± 1 g/liter (P < 0.001).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Basal total and free plasma cortisol and cortisol increments after tetracosactrin (ACTH 1–24), CBG, and albumin levels in patients with SS (n = 45) and S (n = 19), and in HCs (n = 10). The plots represent median, 25th, and 75th percentiles as vertical boxes with error bars (10th and 90th percentiles). * and {delta} denote P < 0.05 for SS vs. S and SS vs. control, respectively. The basal total (A) and free cortisol (B) concentrations were significantly higher in the SS group than in the S and control groups. Free cortisol increments (D) corresponded to S and its severity, whereas total cortisol increments did not (C). CBG and plasma albumin levels (E and F) fell significantly with illness severity.

 
RAI: total and free cortisol levels

One third (15 of 45, 33%) of SS patients met the current empiric definition of RAI ({Delta} ≤ 248). None of the S patients had RAI. Nine of the 15 patients with {Delta} less than or equal to 248 (60%) and 50% (15 of 30) of patients with non-RAI ({Delta} > 248) received stress-dose hydrocortisone therapy. There was no difference in the duration of vasopressor support between the two groups (RAI, 8.3 ± 2.4 vs. non-RAI, 4.4 ± 1.0 d, P > 0.05). There was also no difference in the duration of hydrocortisone therapy between the two groups (RAI, 7.0 ± 2.2 vs. non-RAI, 3.0 ± 1.0 d, P > 0.05). Among patients with {Delta} less than or equal to 248, 33% (three of nine) of hydrocortisone-treated compared with 50% (three of six) of nonhydrocortisone-treated patients died by d 28. In contrast, 50% (15 of 30) of patients with {Delta} greater than 248 who received hydrocortisone and 20% (three of 15) of nonhydrocortisone-treated patients died by d 28. Overall, there was no significant difference in the 28-d mortality of SS patients with and without RAI (40 vs. 35%, respectively; P > 0.05).

Total and free cortisol, CBG, and albumin levels in SS patients are shown in Fig. 2Go. Patients with {Delta} less than or equal to 248 had higher basal total cortisol (1154 ± 145 vs. 756 ± 87 nmol/liter, P = 0.028) and basal free cortisol levels (287 ± 51 vs. 140 ± 22 nmol/liter, P = 0.017). As expected by definition, total cortisol increments were less in the RAI group than the non-RAI group (99 ± 20 vs. 648 ± 101, P < 0.001). Free cortisol increments were also significantly less (59 ± 11 vs. 252 ± 48, P < 0.001). Lower cortisol increments in RAI were not related to CBG or albumin concentrations because these were similar: CBG, RAI, 350 ± 38 vs. non-RAI, 328 ± 18, P > 0.05; albumin, RAI, 19 ± 2 vs. non-RAI, 19 ± 1, P > 0.05.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Basal and tetracosactrin-stimulated total and free cortisol levels in SS patients with RAI ({Delta} ≤ 248, n = 15) and without RAI ({Delta} > 248, n = 30). The plots represent median, 25th, and 75th percentiles as vertical boxes with error bars (10th and 90th percentiles). *, P < 0.05 for RAI vs. non-RAI. Patients with RAI had significantly higher basal total cortisol (A) and free cortisol (B) levels and lower total and free cortisol increment posttetracosactrin stimulation (C and D). There was no difference in CBG and plasma albumin levels between the groups.

 
Thirteen of 15 (87%) patients with {Delta} less than or equal to 248 had a free cortisol increment after tetracosactrin of less than 110 nmol/liter, and 27 of 31 (87%) of patients with {Delta} greater than 248 exceeded this threshold. Hence, a free cortisol increment of 110 nmol/liter categorizes RAI and non-RAI patients similarly to a total cortisol response of 248 nmol/liter.

Results of repeated tetracosactrin tests after recovery from SS and S

By the time of hospital discharge, follow-up tests showed free cortisol levels had fallen to baseline, but total cortisol remained elevated (Fig. 3GoGo). Among survivors, mean basal total cortisol levels remained high at the second test (first test, SS, 880 ± 79 vs. second test, 464 ± 45 nmol/liter, P < 0.05), but mean basal free cortisol had significantly declined (first test, 186 ± 24 vs. second test, 38 ± 8 nmol/liter, P < 0.001). Basal total cortisol did, however, fall by the third tetracosactrin stimulation test. In SS patients, total cortisol increments after tetracosactrin did not change significantly on retesting (first test, 477 ± 79 vs. second test, 441 ± 36 nmol/liter, P = not significant), but there was a fall in free cortisol by the second test (first test, 192 ± 36 vs. second test, 84 ± 14 nmol/liter, P = 0.009). Persistently elevated total cortisol in the SS group, despite a fall in free cortisol, reflects the effect of rising CBG (first test, 335 ± 17 vs. second test, 502 ± 37, P < 0.001; second test vs. third test, 569 ± 24 nmol/liter, P > 0.05) and rising albumin (first test, 19 ± 1 vs. second test, 24 ± 2, P = 0.004; second vs. third test, 35 ± 2 nmol/liter, P < 0.001). Of the six patient (with {Delta} ≤ 248) retested with tetracosactrin, all had {Delta} cortisol greater than 248 nmol/liter at the time of the second test. S patients exhibited no significant change in basal or stimulated total and free cortisol on retesting. Among S patients, mean CBG levels rose slightly but nonsignificantly on retesting (first test, 412 ± 40 vs. second test, 526 ± 45 vs. third test, 576 ± 71 nmol/liter, P > 0.05). Albumin levels rose significantly (first test, 19 ± 1 vs. second test, 30 ± 2 vs. third test, 36 ± 0.4 nmol/liter, P = 0.05).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Cortisol (total and free), CBG, and albumin levels from serial tetracosactrin stimulation tests in SS patients. Results are shown as median, 25th, and 75th percentiles with SE values. *, P < 0.05 for SS vs. S vs. HC. Tests were performed at the following times: first test, at the time of illness; second test, immediately before hospital discharge; and third test, 6–12 wk after discharge. Twenty SS and 10 S patients had the second test, and 14 SS and eight S patients had the third test. In the SS group, basal total cortisol fell on the second test, but free cortisol fell to baseline. Also, total cortisol increments after tetracosactrin did not change by the second test, but the free cortisol had normalized. Differences in total and free cortisol in the S group were smaller.

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3A. Continued

 
Calculated and measured free cortisol

Calculated free cortisol (Coolens’ method) and measured free cortisol (ultracentrifugation) were in close agreement (r = 0.9, P < 0.001, Fig. 4AGo). We also compared free cortisol by ultrafiltration with free cortisol calculated to take account of albumin concentration (Fig. 4BGo) using the experimentally derived values of N (Table 2Go). Furthermore, we compared the correlation between calculated and measured free cortisol in patients with hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin ≤ 25 g/liter) with those with normal albumin concentrations. As shown in Fig. 4CGo, the correlation coefficient (r) of 0.911, P < 0.001, is obtained for calculated vs. measured free cortisol in patients with hypoalbuminemia compared with r = 0.936 for the normoproteinemic group. Overall, adjustment of the Coolens’ equation constant N to take account of varying albumin concentrations had little effect on estimated free cortisol.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Comparisons between measured free cortisol by ultrafiltration method and calculated free cortisol by Coolens’ equation where the substitute for N is 1.74 (A) and calculated free cortisol using experimentally derived N to take account of varying plasma albumin concentrations (B), as shown in Table 2Go. Graph C compares the correlation of calculated vs. measured free cortisol in patients with hypoalbuminemia with those with normal albumin concentrations. All samples from the SS, S, and control groups were used in these analyses. The data suggest that adjustment of the Coolens’ equation for varying plasma albumin concentrations is probably not warranted.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. The effect of varying concentrations of purified human serum albumin in a solution containing 600 nmol/liter cortisol on free cortisol fraction obtained by equilibrium dialysis, and on N (the ratio of albumin bound:free cortisol)

 
Validation of free cortisol assay

The ultrafiltration method of measuring free cortisol was compared with the gold standard of equilibrium dialysis using 19 samples from SS patients and 10 samples from normal individuals. The methods yield near identical cortisol values, and the correlation coefficient is r = 0.99 (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Validation of free cortisol assay (ligand binding/ultrafiltration method) against equilibrium dialysis using 19 SS samples and 10 control samples.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study suggests that free plasma cortisol is likely to provide a more accurate reflection of circulating glucocorticoid activity than total plasma cortisol. Our findings in support of this proposition are: 1) ACTH-stimulated free cortisol increments varied markedly in SS, S, and HCs, whereas total cortisol increments were nearly identical across all groups; 2) basal free cortisol levels were severalfold more elevated than total cortisol in SS, compared with S and HCs; 3) after resolution of SS, basal free cortisol levels fell promptly, but total cortisol levels remained elevated; and 4) there is less overlap between RAI ({Delta} ≤ 248) and non-RAI ({Delta} > 248) patients when basal free cortisol levels were used rather than basal total cortisol levels. In addition, we found that Coolens’ method predicts free cortisol, as measured by ultracentrifugation in a method validated by equilibrium dialysis, in SS.

RAI is defined by some investigators based on mortality and treatment responses to hydrocortisone. Our study cannot support or refute the concept of RAI but suggests that free cortisol may be a better guide to cortisolemia.

Cortisol circulates in plasma in three fractions; 80–90% is bound to the 52- to 56-kDa glycoprotein, CBG, 5–10% is loosely bound to albumin, and up to 5% circulates as free or unbound cortisol, under unstressed conditions (21). High-affinity cortisol-CBG binding [association constant (Ka), 3 x 107 liter/mol] is saturated at 500–600 nmol/liter of cortisol because each molecule of CBG binds only a single molecule of cortisol (22, 23). In our group of critically ill patients, mean CBG levels were reduced by 48% in SS and by 35% in S. Correspondingly, the basal free cortisol fraction in plasma was 23% in SS, 7% in S, and 3.6% in controls. Despite increased free cortisol in SS, total cortisol levels may remain stable due to reductions in bound cortisol; our data show this because there was little difference in basal and stimulated total cortisol in S and SS but marked differences in free cortisol levels.

Free cortisol measurement, using either ultracentrifugation or equilibrium dialysis to separate free from bound cortisol, is not offered in routine clinical laboratories. Free cortisol measurement is time consuming and nonautomated. There are few clinical studies comparing free cortisol with total cortisol. However, we found that the Coolens’ calculation method, which relies on a number of assumptions, along with routine immunoassay of both total cortisol and CBG, applies in SS. The validity of this equation has been questioned particularly in critical illness where marked reduction of cortisol-binding proteins is observed (24). However, our data reveal that adjustment of the Coolens’ equation constant N to take account of varying albumin concentrations had little effect on estimated free cortisol (Fig. 4Go). These data accord with in vitro data using albumin solutions and 3H cortisol distribution analyzed by ultrafiltration (25). Hence, the Coolens’ method, without adjustment of the N value, could be used in SS and may be more broadly applicable if free cortisol was shown to be superior to total cortisol in assisting the decision to use hydrocortisone therapy. We recognize that a constant value (K) used for the affinity of CBG for cortisol could constitute a limitation if CBG binding affinity changes in SS or in hereditary CBG variants with reduced affinity. The calculated free cortisol would be markedly underestimated if these abnormal forms of CBG can be detected immunologically. Because the frequency of these inherited CBG abnormalities is very low and the Coolens’ equation was reliable, these factors do not affect the clinical usefulness of the proposed method.

A recent report involving 66 critically ill patients, of whom 18 had S but none were reported to have SS, suggested that low cortisol binding proteins, rather than low free cortisol levels, may underlie reports of reduced total cortisol in critical illness (17). Our study supports this contention and suggests that free cortisol should be evaluated in treatment trials in SS. We also examined the possibility that diminished cortisol increments after ACTH may relate to low cortisol binding proteins. However, total cortisol increments less than or equal to 248 nmol/liter were not associated with lower cortisol-binding proteins in our study.

It has been proposed that low cortisol levels in critical illness may be due to adrenal hemorrhage or necrosis, pituitary ACTH deficits, and/or genetic polymorphisms that limit maximal adrenocortical hormone secretion (6). Our follow-up data reveal prompt recovery from RAI in SS survivors, although this observation involved only six patients. Moreover, follow-up testing of SS patients showed an overall return of free cortisol levels to normal values postillness, which is in keeping with the concept of a lack of functional adrenal reserve rather than adrenal damage during critical illness.

A design limitation of our study is that we cannot analyze free or total cortisol levels with respect to patient outcomes because therapy was not randomized, and our numbers are not sufficient to determine treatment effects. For example, we did not show a significant difference in mortality between RAI and non-RAI patients in SS. Although we found that a free cortisol increment of 110 nmol/liter categorized patients similarly to a total cortisol increment after tetracosactrin of 248 nmol/liter, a different free cortisol cutoff may correspond to the effects of hydrocortisone treatment, but to demonstrate such an effect would require a therapeutic trial. There were more males than females in the S group, and the controls were younger. However, due to the relatively minor effects of age and gender on the HPA axis function (26, 27, 28), we do not expect that this would have significantly altered the results.

The concept of RAI is controversial because it is not immediately apparent why reduced adrenal reserve, as evidenced by reduced cortisol response to ACTH despite high basal total cortisol, is predictive of responsiveness to parenteral hydrocortisone in SS. Traditionally, adrenal function would be considered normal with ACTH stimulation testing if basal cortisol levels are elevated irrespective of the magnitude of the increment in response to ACTH. On the other hand, the identification of patients who cannot increase cortisol secretion after exogenous ACTH may be revealing a subgroup that requires more cortisol despite high basal levels, perhaps due to acquired tissue glucocorticoid resistance. It is relevant here that one stress-dose hydrocortisone regimen (10 mg/h) produces total cortisol levels of approximately 3100 nmol/liter, well above the levels seen in our SS patients (29). Nevertheless, the concept has empirical support in prognostic (9, 10) and hydrocortisone (14) therapy studies. Although our data do not support or refute the concept of RAI, it appears relevant that free cortisol increments after tetracosactrin varied markedly with S severity, whereas total cortisol increments, on which the most validated empiric definitions of RAI rely, did not vary with S severity. Hence, we think that free cortisol measures may contribute usefully to studies that attempt to use plasma cortisol to predict responses to hydrocortisone.

In comparison with a large therapeutic trial (n = 299) in SS, the prevalence of RAI (33 vs. 77%) and mortality rate (37 vs. 55%) were lower, despite comparable patient selection criteria (14). Furthermore, in our patients with RAI, mean basal total cortisol levels were higher in RAI than in non-RAI, whereas in the study of Annane et al. (14), basal total cortisol was lower in RAI. The illness severity of the patients in the two studies is difficult to compare as different severity indices were used, although our mean APACHE II scores were similar to other studies of SS (8). It should be recognized that etomidate, an inhibitor of 11-ß hydroxylase, was administered to some patients in the study by Annane et al. (14), and this could have contributed to the observed higher frequency of RAI. In the current study, no patient received etomidate.

In summary, free cortisol more closely reflects sepsis severity and falls to normal more quickly after recovery than total cortisol. Lower total cortisol increments in RAI, using one current definition, were due to reduced free cortisol increments rather than lower cortisol binding proteins. Our data indicate that the Coolens’ calculation is a reliable predictor of measured free cortisol and would be more practical than direct measurement. In the development of the notion that cortisol increments after tetracosactrin and basal cortisol measures may predict responsiveness to hydrocortisone treatment, our data suggest that free cortisol may be a better index of cortisolemia than the total cortisol measures hitherto advocated.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank the medical and nursing staff of the Intensive Care Unit and Carmen Bischoff, Endocrine Test Unit nurse, for assistance.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by a Royal Adelaide Hospital Clinical Research Grant.

First Published Online November 1, 2005

Abbreviations: APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; CBG, corticosteroid-binding globulin; HC, healthy control; RAI, relative adrenal insufficiency; S, sepsis; SS, septic shock.

Received February 7, 2005.

Accepted October 20, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Minneci PC, Deans KJ, Banks SM, Eichacker PQ, Natanson C 2004 Meta-analysis: the effect of steroids on survival and shock during sepsis depends on the dose. Ann Intern Med 141:47–56[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Annane D, Bellissant E, Bollaert PE, Briegel J, Keh D, Kupfer Y 2004 Corticosteroids for severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J 329:480
  3. Bollaert PE, Charpentier C, Levy B, Debouverie M, Audibert G, Larcan A 1998 Reversal of late septic shock with supraphysiological doses of hydrocortisone. Crit Care Med 26:645–650[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Briegel J, Forst H, Haller M, Schelling G, Kilger E, Kuprat G, Hemmer B, Hummel T, Lenhart A, Heyduck M, Stoll C, Peter K 1999 Stress doses of hydrocortisone reverse hyperdynamic septic shock: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center study. Crit Care Med 27:723–732[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Yildiz O, Doganay M, Aygen B, Guven M, Keleutimur F, Tutuu A 2002 Physiological-dose steroid therapy in sepsis. Crit Care 6:190–191[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Beishuizen A, Thijs LG 2001 Relative adrenal failure in intensive care: an identifiable problem requiring treatment? Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 15:513–531[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Zaloga GP 2001 Sepsis-induced deficiency syndrome. Crit Care Med 29:688–690[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ligtenberg JJ, Zijlstra JG 2004 The relative adrenal insufficiency syndrome revisited: which patients will benefit from low-dose steroids? Curr Opin Crit Care 10:456–460[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Annane D, Sebille V, Troche G, Raphael JC, Gajdos P, Bellissant E 2000 A 3-level prognostic classification in septic shock based on cortisol levels and cortisol response to corticotropin. JAMA 283:1038–1045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Rothwell PM, Udwadia ZF, Lawler PG 1991 Cortisol response to corticotrophin and survival in septic shock. Lancet 337:582–583[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Moran JL, Chapman MJ, O’Fathartaigh MS, Peisach AR, Pannall PR, Leppard P 1994 Hypocortisolaemia and adrenocortical responsiveness at onset of septic shock. Intensive Care Med 20:489–495[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Briegel J, Schelling G, Haller M 1996 A comparison of the adrenocortical response during septic shock and after complete recovery. Intensive Care Med 22:894–899[Medline]
  13. Bouachour G, Tirot P, Gouello JP 1995 Adrenocortical function during septic shock. Intensive Care Med 21:57–62[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Annane D, Sebille V, Charpentier C, Bollaert PE, Francois B, Korach JM, Capellier G, Cohen Y, Azoulay E, Troche G, Chaumet-Riffaut P, Bellissant E 2002 Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. JAMA 288:862–871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Coolens JL, Van Baelen H, Heyns W 1987 Clinical use of unbound plasma cortisol as calculated from total cortisol and corticosteroid-binding globulin. J Steroid Biochem 26:197–202[Medline]
  16. Dunn J, Nisula B, Rodbard D 1981 Transport of steroid hormones: binding of 21 endogenous steroids to both testosterone-binding globulin and corticosteroid-binding globulin in human plasma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 53:58–68[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hamrahian AH, Oseni TS, Arafah BM 2004 Measurements of serum free cortisol in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 350:1629–1638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Confalonieri M, Urbino R, Potena A, Piattella M, Piarigi P, Puccio G, Porta RD, Carbone G, Blasi F, Umberger R 2005 Hydrocortisone infusion for severe community-acquired pneumonia: a preliminary randomized study. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 171:242–248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. 1992 American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 20:864–874[Medline]
  20. Lewis JG, Lewis MG, Elder PA 2003 An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for corticosteroid-binding globulin using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies: decline in CBG following synthetic ACTH. Clin Chim Acta 328:121–128[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Hammond GL 1990 Molecular properties of corticosteroid binding globulin and the sex-steroid binding proteins. Endocr Rev 11:65–79[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ballard PL 1979 In: Baxter J, Rousseau G, eds. Delivery and transport of glucocorticoids to target cells. New York: Springer-Verlag; 25–48
  23. Hammond GL, Smith CL, Underhill DA 1991 Molecular studies of corticosteroid binding globulin structure, biosynthesis and function. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 40:755–762[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Vogeser M, Felbinger TW, Kilger E, Roll W, Fraunberger P, Jacob K 1999 Corticosteroid-binding globulin and free cortisol in the early postoperative period after cardiac surgery. Clin Biochem 32:213–216[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Lewis JG, Bagley CJ, Elder PA, Bachmann AW, Torpy DJ 2005 Plasma free cortisol fraction reflects levels of functioning corticosteroid-binding globulin. Clin Chim Acta 359:189–194[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Parker CRJ, Slayden SM, Azziz R, Crabbe SL, Hines GA, Boots LR, Bae S 2000 Effects of aging on adrenal function in the human: responsiveness and sensitivity of adrenal androgens and cortisol to adrenocorticotropin in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:48–54[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Waltman C, Blackman MR, Chrousos GP, Riemann C, Harman SM 1991 Spontaneous and glucocorticoid-inhibited adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol secretion are similar in healthy young and old men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:495–502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Fernandez-Real J-M, Pugeat M, Grasa M 2002 Serum corticosteroid-binding globulin concentration and insulin resistance syndrome: a population study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4686–4690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Keh D, Boehnke T, Weber-Cartens S, Schulz C, Ahlers O, Bercker S, Volk HD, Doecke WD, Falke K, Gerlach H 2003 Immunologic and hemodynamic effects of "low-dose" hydrocortisone in septic shock: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 167:512–520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Annane D 2003 Letters: corticosteroids for patients with septic shock. JAMA 289:41–44 (Author’s response)[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
I. Wallace, S. Cunningham, and J. Lindsay
The diagnosis and investigation of adrenal insufficiency in adults
Ann Clin Biochem, September 1, 2009; 46(5): 351 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. M. Keenan, F. Roelfsema, B. J. Carroll, A. Iranmanesh, and J. D. Veldhuis
Sex defines the age dependence of endogenous ACTH-cortisol dose responsiveness
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2009; 297(2): R515 - R523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. E. Marik
Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency
Chest, January 1, 2009; 135(1): 181 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Bendel, S. Karlsson, V. Pettila, P. Loisa, M. Varpula, E. Ruokonen, and For the Finnsepsis Study Group
Free Cortisol in Sepsis and Septic Shock
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1813 - 1819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
M. S. Cooper and P. M. Stewart
Adrenal Insufficiency in Critical Illness
J Intensive Care Med, November 1, 2007; 22(6): 348 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
K. Klouche, E. F. Da Mota, R. Durant, L. Amigues, P. Corne, O. Jonquet, and J. J. Beraud
Hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis reactivity and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate plasma concentrations in the critically ill elderly
Age Ageing, November 1, 2007; 36(6): 686 - 689.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. M. Arafah, F. J. Nishiyama, H. Tlaygeh, and R. Hejal
Measurement of Salivary Cortisol Concentration in the Assessment of Adrenal Function in Critically Ill Subjects: A Surrogate Marker of the Circulating Free Cortisol
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8): 2965 - 2971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
I. Vanhorebeek, R. P. Peeters, S. Vander Perre, I. Jans, P. J. Wouters, K. Skogstrand, T. K. Hansen, R. Bouillon, and G. Van den Berghe
Cortisol Response to Critical Illness: Effect of Intensive Insulin Therapy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3803 - 3813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. M. Arafah
Hypothalamic Pituitary Adrenal Function during Critical Illness: Limitations of Current Assessment Methods
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3725 - 3745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Torpy, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Torpy, D. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*COSYNTROPIN
*HYDROCORTISONE
Medline Plus Health Information
*Sepsis
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals