help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0677
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ostberg, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Conway, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ostberg, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Conway, G. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 9 5161-5166
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

Vasculopathy in Turner Syndrome: Arterial Dilatation and Intimal Thickening without Endothelial Dysfunction

Julia E. Ostberg, Ann E. Donald, Julian P. J. Halcox, Clare Storry, Carolyn McCarthy and Gerard S. Conway

Department of Endocrinology (J.E.O., C.M., G.S.C.), University College London Hospitals, London W1T 3AA, United Kingdom; and Vascular Physiology Unit (A.E.D., J.P.J.H., C.S.), Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Gerard Conway, Department of Endocrinology, The Middlesex Hospital, Mortimer Street, London W1T 3AA, United Kingdom. E-mail: g.conway{at}ucl.ac.uk.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Women with Turner syndrome (TS) have an increased cardiovascular mortality rate from both structural and ischemic heart disease, especially aortic dissection.

Objective: We hypothesized that TS women have a fundamental arterial wall defect that may be due to genetic factors or estrogen deficiency.

Design, Setting, and Patients: TS women (n = 93) were compared with normal controls (n = 25) and women with 46,XX primary amenorrhea (PA) (n = 11) with a similar history of estrogen deficiency. Clinical parameters, aortic root diameter, extraaortic arterial structure [common carotid (CD), brachial artery diameter, and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT)], arterial stiffness (pulse-wave velocity, augmentation index), and endothelial function (flow-mediated dilatation) were assessed.

Main Outcome Measures: These included arterial diameters and vascular physiology parameters.

Results: Differences in arterial structure were observed among TS, normal controls, and 46,XX PA women: IMT (0.61 ± 0.07 vs. 0.55 ± 0.06 vs. 0.60 ± 0.05 mm, respectively; P < 0.001), CD (5.71 ± 0.64 vs. 5.27 ± 0.34 vs. 5.22 ± 0.38 mm; P < 0.001), and brachial artery diameter (3.29 ± 0.44 vs. 3.06 ± 0.36 vs. 2.97 ± 0.30 mm; P = 0.006). Aortic root diameter was greater in TS than normal control women. TS status, height, weight, and IMT were independently associated with increased CD after multivariate adjustment (P < 0.05). TS status, age, diastolic blood pressure, and CD remained independently associated with increased IMT after multivariate adjustment (P < 0.05). Pulse-wave velocity and flow-mediated dilatation were similar among the three groups.

Conclusion: Women with TS have greater IMT and conduit artery diameters than normal controls. Similarly, increased IMT in TS and 46,XX PA women suggests that estrogen deficiency contributes to intimal thickening. Interventional studies are required to determine the extent to which blood pressure and estrogen deficiency may be appropriate therapeutic targets to reduce cardiovascular risk in TS.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CARDIOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS ARE the main cause of increased mortality in Turner syndrome (TS), in which life expectancy may be reduced by up to 13 yr. The greatest excess risk is dissection or rupture of the aorta, which accounts for death in 2–8% of women (1, 2). Dilatation of the root of the aorta, hypertension, and bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have been reported as predisposing factors for aortic dissection (3, 4). In addition, mortality due to ischemic heart disease is increased up to 7-fold in women with TS (2). Risk factors for ischemic heart disease reported in TS include hypertension (4, 5, 6), diabetes mellitus (6), dyslipidemia (7, 8), obesity (8, 9), and estrogen deficiency (10, 11, 12, 13), but the precise mechanisms of increased cardiovascular risk in TS are unclear.

Although the aortic abnormalities of TS such as aortic root dilatation and coarctation, are well recognized (14, 15), we hypothesized that women with TS have a fundamental arterial wall defect extending beyond the arch of the aorta. This may be related to genetic factors or estrogen deficiency. The present study set out to characterize the vasculopathy of TS by assessing arterial structure [carotid (CD) and brachial artery diameter (BD) and carotid artery intima media thickness (IMT)], arterial stiffness [pulse-wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx)] and endothelial function [brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD)].


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ninety-three unselected women from the Middlesex Hospital adult TS clinic who had previously taken part in our echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging screening study (14) participated in the present study. They were compared with 25 normal control women of similar age who were taking no medication and had regular spontaneous menstrual cycles. Because women with TS differ from normals in two major ways (an X-chromosome defect and estrogen deficiency secondary to primary amenorrhea), a second comparison group was recruited comprising 11 women of similar age with 46,XX primary amenorrhea (PA). These women presented with PA (nine had gonadal dysgenesis, two had hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism) but had a normal karyotype and stature. The study was approved by the University College London Hospitals Ethics Committee, and participants gave written informed consent.

Clinical history and case notes were reviewed for previous medical history and cardiac surgery. History of estrogen replacement and previous GH administration, smoking, and exercise were recorded, and current medications, especially the use of antihypertensives, were noted. All women with TS and normal controls underwent echocardiography.

Subjects attended after a 12-h overnight fast, and a blood sample was taken before vascular physiology assessment for analysis of lipids, glucose, insulin, and karyotype. The homeostasis model insulin resistance index was calculated as the product of fasting insulin and glucose concentrations divided by 22.5. Antihypertensive medication was withheld for at least 24 h. Anthropometric parameters were assessed including height, weight, and waist and hip measurements. Recumbent blood pressure was recorded at the right brachial artery using an automated sphygmomanometer (Dinamap, Critikon, Tampa, FL) after subjects had rested for at least 15 min. Five readings were taken and mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure calculated. A large cuff was used for obese individuals.

PWV and AIx

PWV was determined with the subject supine, using a transcutaneous pressure tonometer (SphygmoCor system, AtCor Medical, West Ryde, NSW, Australia) to record the pulse pressure waveform consecutively at the carotid and femoral artery. The distance traveled by the pulse wave was measured over the body surface, and the pulse wave velocity (in meters/second) was derived from the mean time difference between the R-wave measured in a simultaneously recorded electrocardiogram and pressure wave in relation to the arterial path length.

AIx was calculated using the radial pulse pressure waveform to derive the central pressure waveform using a validated generalized transfer function. This was then corrected for heart rate.

CD and IMT measurement

CD was measured 1 cm below the common carotid artery bifurcation using high resolution B-mode real-time ultrasound (Acuson XP10 ultrasound system) with a 5–10 MHz linear array transducer. Ultrasound images were recorded on videotape and interpretation of scans was performed by a single blinded analyzer. CD was calculated from the end-diastolic distance between the lumen-intima interfaces measured in three sequential R-wave-triggered frames, whereas IMT was defined by the lumen-intima and media-adventitia interfaces of the far wall. Three measurements were taken for both parameters on each side, and the mean of right and left taken as the overall average CD and IMT respectively.

BD and flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) measurement

High-resolution ultrasound was used to determine the change in BD in response to the hyperemic stimulus mediated by 5 min of forearm ischemia and also in response to 25 µg glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) as previously described (16). Off-line analysis was performed using an edge-detection software package (Brachial Tools, Medical Imaging Applications, Iowa City, IA).

All vascular physiology measurements were undertaken by two experienced vascular technologists. Blinded replicate measures were performed to assess reliability and found inter- and intraobserver correlation coefficients to be 0.96 and 0.99, respectively. Masked analysis of videotape-recorded scans and computing of results was performed by a single analyzer.

Echocardiography

M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography was undertaken in the women with TS and the normal controls (Aspen echocardiography machine; Acuson, Mountain View, CA). Measurements of aortic root diameter (ARD) at the level of the annulus and the presence of BAV were recorded.

Statistical analysis

Published data in the general population have shown that an increase in IMT in the common carotid artery correlates with an 11% increase in risk of myocardial infarction (17). Using pilot data in 18 subjects with TS, compared with controls, we calculated that for a power of 90% and a significance level of 0.05, 22 subjects would be required in each group to detect a mean ± SD difference in IMT of 0.4 ± 0.4 mm. Because TS is a heterogeneous condition, we opted to recruit 93 subjects to allow for analysis of effects in subgroups, such as those who had received GH (30%) or those with monosomy X as opposed to other karyotypes (48%). Eleven women with 46,XX PA were recruited for illustration of the effect of estrogen deficiency.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 11.0 for Windows, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Associations among variables were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and ANOVA or Student’s t test for continuous variables, with log transformation and Scheffé post hoc analysis where appropriate and controlling for cofactors when indicated. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used for nonparametric and categorical variables. Estrogen exposure in TS and 46,XX PA groups was compared by Mann-Whitney U test. Linear regression analysis (entry method) was used to assess strength and independence of associations between variables.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
General comparisons and observations of clinical and metabolic factors

Women with TS were shorter and had greater body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and heart rate than women in the normal control and 46,XX PA groups (Table 1Go). They smoked less (85 vs. 60 vs. 36% had never smoked in TS, normals, and 46,XX PA groups, respectively; P < 0.001) and took less exercise (15 vs. 48 vs. 36% took regular moderate or vigorous exercise in the three groups, respectively; P < 0.001). Four women with TS had type 2 diabetes mellitus.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Comparison of clinical characteristics in women with TS, normal controls, and women with 46,XX PA

 
All women with TS and 46,XX PA were on routine physiological estrogen replacement and reported good compliance. TS women started estrogen treatment at an earlier age [median (range) 14 (5–25) vs. 17 (12–22) yr; P = 0.001] and had fewer years of estrogen deficiency [3 (0–27) vs. 6 (1–11) yr; P = 0.001] than the 46,XX PA women. In the TS group, proportions taking oral synthetic (ethinylestradiol), oral natural (estradiol valerate and Premarin), and patch estrogens were 19.1, 71.9, and 9.0%, respectively, with 100% of women in the 46,XX PA group taking oral natural estrogens ({chi}2 test; P = 0.127). Also, 30.1% of TS women had previously been treated with GH, with a median (range) start age of 10 [5–17) and 4.5 (0.5–10)] yr duration of treatment. In addition, 48.4% of the women with TS had karyotype 45,X. Other karyotypes in the TS group included isochromosome X (29%), partial X deletion (2.2%), ring X (8.6%), any Y fragment (4.3%), mosaic 45X/46XX (4.3%), and complex forms (3.2%).

A BAV was identified in 17 (18%) women with TS, and six women were known to have significant aortic coarctation from our previous magnetic resonance imaging study (14). Two women with TS had aortic stenosis (peak aortic valve gradients 31 and 42 mm Hg, respectively), of whom one also had BAV, and these subjects were excluded from the analyses of AIx. Twenty women were taking antihypertensive medication (nine on atenolol, five on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, four on bendrofluazide, one on an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, and one on a calcium channel antagonist). Both exclusion of the women with each category of complications individually and all TS women with any complication (n = 32) did not alter the relationship between TS status and the vascular parameters studied except augmentation index as mentioned above. The data presented for TS throughout the study are therefore inclusive of all TS women unless otherwise stated, although Table 2Go demonstrates the main outcome measures in TS women with and without complications for reference.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Comparison of measures of arterial structure and stiffness and endothelial function TS with and without complications

 
Comparison of the vascular phenotype in TS, 46,XX PA, and normal controls

Comparison of arterial structure. Women with TS had greater absolute and height-adjusted CD than women in the normal control and 46,XX PA groups (Table 3Go). This relationship remained after adjusting for factors that were associated with CD in women with TS (see below): height, weight, and IMT (P < 0.001). Group differences were also significant for absolute and height-adjusted BD. Relative differences in arterial diameters between women with TS, compared with controls, are shown in Fig. 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Comparison of absolute and height-adjusted measures of arterial structure and stiffness in women with TS, normal controls, and women with 46,XX PA

 


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Comparison of percentage differences in arterial dimensions in women with TS, compared with control values set at 100%. Solid black bars represent women with TS, and unshaded bars represent normal control women. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 for the comparison between TS and controls. Data are height adjusted.

 
IMT was greater in TS than normal control women (P < 0.001) but similar in the TS and 46,XX PA groups (P = 0.837) (Table 3Go). These group differences remained significant after adjustment for factors that were associated with IMT in women with TS (see below): age, diastolic blood pressure, and CD (P = 0.002).

Comparison of arterial stiffness. PWV was similar in all three groups of women. AIx was greater in women with TS than the other two groups, but the difference among these groups was no longer significant after adjustment for height (TableGo 3).

Comparison of brachial artery vasomotor function. FMD was similar in the three groups, with and without adjustment for the magnitude of the flow stimulus (Table 4Go). Vasodilator responses to GTN were also similar.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Comparison of endothelial function measured at the brachial artery in women with TS, normal controls, and women with 46,XX PA

 
Factors associated with the vascular phenotype in TS

Factors associated with arterial structure. CD was associated with height (r = 0.340; P = 0.001), weight (r = 0.383; P < 0.001), total cholesterol (r = 0.228; P = 0.030), carotid IMT (r = 0.254; P = 0.015), and FMD (r = –0.233; P = 0.026). The associations between CD and both BD and ARD (mean ± SD 2.8 ± 0.4 cm) did not achieve significance (r = 0.208; P = 0.054 and r = 0.199; P = 0.059, respectively). On multiple regression analysis, height (partial r = 0.245; P = 0.019), weight (partial r = 0.247; P = 0.019), and carotid IMT (partial r = 0.277; P = 0.004) were found to be independently associated with CD. Similar associations were observed with BD.

ARD was greater in the 17 women with BAV, compared with those without (3.0 ± 0.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.4 cm; P = 0.040), but CD and BD were not influenced by BAV (CD 5.6 ± 0.6 vs. 5.7 ± 0.6 cm; P = 0.416; BD 3.3 ± 0.3 vs. 3.3 ± 0.5 cm; P = 0.882 in women with and without BAV, respectively).

Carotid IMT was associated with age (r = 0.488; P < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (r = 0.325; P = 0.002), diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.370; P < 0.001), CD (r = 0.277; P = 0.004), and AIx (r = 0.441; P < 0.001). On multiple regression analysis, age (partial r = 0.358; P < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (partial r = 0.222; P = 0.043), and CD (partial r = 0.220; P = 0.012) were independently associated with IMT. History of smoking, exercise, diabetes mellitus, previous GH treatment, karyotype, and the presence of a BAV, aortic stenosis, and coarctation site abnormalities were not associated with CD or IMT.

Factors associated with arterial stiffness. PWV and AIx increased significantly with age (PWV, r = 0.326; P = 0.002; Aix, r = 0.397; P < 0.001) and both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (P ≤ 0.001). Neither PWV nor AIx was associated with weight, lipids, smoking history, exercise, or karyotype. Variation in the use of GH in childhood and cumulative years of estrogen deficiency were not associated with PWV or AIx after adjustment for age. PWV and AIx were similar in those with and without BAV.

Determinants of endothelial function. FMD was independently associated with waist circumference (partial correlation coefficient, r = –0.206; P = 0.039), total cholesterol concentration (r = –0.215; P = 0.032), and heart rate (r = 0.303; P = 0.002).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study demonstrates the widespread structural vascular differences in women with TS characterized by enlargement of conduit arteries and increased carotid intimal thickening, compared with normal controls. Of note, arterial enlargement appears to involve multiple vessels and is associated with increased intimal thickening. Although this suggests that common underlying mechanisms may be, at least in part, responsible, the similar increase in IMT without arterial dilatation that we observed in 46XX PA subjects supports a more selective contribution from estrogen deficiency to the intimal hyperplasia seen in TS. We also found that FMD was similar in TS, 46XX PA and control women, suggesting that conduit artery endothelial dysfunction does not contribute significantly to the large vessel abnormalities seen in young women with TS and early estrogen deficiency.

The occurrence of aortic dilatation in TS is well established (4, 18, 19). It has been associated with the presence of BAV, aortic coarctation, and hypertension, but its etiology is poorly understood. We observed that although ARD was greater in women with TS who have BAV, arterial dilatation is not restricted to these individuals and also occurs in other large conduit vessels, such as the carotid and brachial arteries, to a similar extent in those with and without BAV.

We have demonstrated that CD is independently associated with TS status, height, weight, and carotid IMT. However, in contrast to women with TS and despite a greater degree of estrogen deficiency, karyotypically normal women with primary amenorrhea had normal CD and BD, thus suggesting that genetic factors rather than estrogen deficiency have a greater influence on arterial dilatation in TS. The absence of an independent association between peripheral arterial diameter and BAV, aortic stenosis, or blood pressure suggests an intrinsic abnormality of the arterial wall in TS. An analogy to the arterial dilatation seen in Marfan syndrome has been postulated (18, 20). Indeed, cystic medial necrosis similar to that in Marfan syndrome has been reported in 65% of TS case reports of aortic dissection, in which histology was available (3, 21, 22).

The apparent relationship between generalized arterial dilatation and increased IMT may, in part, be consistent with the Glagov phenomenon (23). This refers to the outward remodeling and enlargement of atherosclerotic arteries as a consequence of complex inflammatory changes in the vascular wall that compensates for luminal occlusion in the earlier stages of disease development. For example, increased CD was independently associated with IMT as well as the presence of atherosclerotic plaques and increased blood pressure in a population-based study of older subjects (24). Increased IMT is a marker of early carotid atherosclerosis and an independent predictor of an adverse cardiovascular prognosis in the general population (17). In our study, IMT was greater in TS than control women but similar between TS and 46,XX PA groups. However, the fact that CD was increased only in the TS group suggests that factors other than the Glagov phenomenon are involved. In the general population, IMT has been shown to be associated with traditional risk factors for ischemic heart disease, such as age, blood pressure, serum lipids, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and BMI (17, 25). In this study of younger women, the major influences on variation of IMT measurements were TS, normal, or 46,XX PA status; age; and blood pressure. Although women with TS had raised blood pressure, compared with the other two groups, this did not appear to account for their greater IMT as the difference persisted when only uncomplicated cases were considered (Table 2Go). Indeed, the similar increase in IMT seen in TS and 46,XX PA women implicates estrogen deficiency as the key determinant of neointimal hyperplasia in these subjects.

Estrogen deficiency may, therefore, be an appropriate target for early intervention in both TS and 46,XX PA to reduce progression of intimal thickening, and ultimately clinical atherosclerotic disease, although interventional studies will be required to prove this point. There is a precedence in the literature, with exogenous estrogen reducing IMT in older postmenopausal women (26, 27, 28), but this is not a universal finding (20, 29). It has been suggested that the reason for this discrepancy is a lack of benefit in women with established coronary artery disease or insufficient duration of estrogen therapy (30).

Our comparisons of measures of aortic stiffness in TS, normal controls, and women with 46,XX PA should be interpreted with caution. Although there was a trend toward greater arterial stiffness, as measured by PWV, this did not achieve statistical significance. It has previously been suggested that PWV may be underestimated in the general population when the abdominal aorta becomes more tortuous with age (31), which may be an important factor in women with TS who frequently have greater tortuosity of the descending aorta (32) and elongation of the transverse arch (15). AIx was greater in women with TS than the other two groups, suggestive of an increased contribution of wave reflection to central aortic systolic blood pressure and left ventricular afterload. However, AIx is influenced by both heart rate and body height and should therefore be corrected for both (33). Although the difference in AIx between TS and controls was lost by height adjustment, there may, however, still be relevance for central aortic pathophysiology and increased cardiac loading because neither the transfer function used nor height adjustment with regard to this measure have yet been validated specifically in women with TS.

PWV is an independent marker of cardiovascular risk (34) and is associated with other cardiovascular risk factors such as blood pressure, insulin resistance, central obesity, and greater carotid IMT in the general population (35). Data on the prognostic value of AIx are still emerging, and some studies suggest that it may have even greater predictive power than PWV (36). Invasive studies would be required for accurate clinical validation of these measures in TS.

It has been shown that endothelium-dependent vasodilator function reflects underlying cardiovascular risk factor burden (37) and independently predicts cardiovascular prognosis (38). We found, however, that FMD was similar in women with TS, compared with normal or 46,XXPA controls, suggesting that endothelial dysfunction is not an important mediator of arterial disease in TS.

Thus far there have been very few studies of arterial dynamics in TS. Two studies have explored the effects of exogenous estrogen in women with TS. Both AIx (39) and the vasodilator response to bradykinin in a plethysmography study (40) have been shown to improve when estrogen-deficient women with TS are treated with estrogen. Our results are similar to those in a recent smaller study that focused on both children and women with TS (41). In general, our findings extend those of Baguet et al. (41) by virtue of the increased power and homogeneous adult estrogen-replete population in the present study. For instance, IMT and CD in TS, compared with controls, achieved significance only when corrected for height in the previous study, an adjustment absolutely required in a pediatric population. In the current study, we demonstrate differences in IMT and CD without height correction. In addition, we extend the observation of dilated arteries to include the brachial and have also studied women with 46,XX PA to control for the estrogen deficiency of TS.

In conclusion, women with TS have arterial dilatation involving not only the aorta but also other major conduit arteries, which does not appear to be a consequence of estrogen deficiency. IMT is also greater in TS than normal controls and appears to be related to the degree of arterial dilatation. This raises the possibility of a common pathway for these two processes, although estrogen deficiency does appear to contribute to intimal thickening in TS. FMD was similar in all groups, excluding an important contribution from conduit arterial endothelial dysfunction. Our findings suggest that both genetic factors and estrogen deficiency influence the vasculopathy of TS. Our data suggest that blood pressure and estrogen deficiency may be the most appropriate modifiable therapeutic targets for cardiovascular risk reduction in TS, but interventional studies will now be required.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank all the women who participated in this study.


    Footnotes
 
J.E.O. was supported by grants from the British Heart Foundation, London, United Kingdom (PG/02/025) and the Turner Syndrome Support Society (United Kingdom); A.E.D. was supported by a grant from the Coronary Artery Disease Research Association through the Silcock legacy; J.P.J.H. was supported by the British Heart Foundation, Al Maktoum Senior Lectureship; and C.S. was supported by the Medical Research Council Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.

First Published Online June 28, 2005

Abbreviations: AIx, Augmentation index; ARD, aortic root diameter; BAV, bicuspid aortic valve; BD, brachial artery diameter; BMI, body mass index; CD, carotid artery diameter; FMD, flow-mediated dilatation; GTN, glyceryl trinitrate; IMT, intima-media thickness; PA, primary amenorrhea; PWV, pulse-wave velocity; TS, Turner syndrome.

Received March 28, 2005.

Accepted June 17, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Price WH, Clayton JF, Collyer S, De Mey R, Wilson J 1986 Mortality ratios, life expectancy, and causes of death in patients with Turner’s syndrome. J Epidemiol Community Health 40:97–102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Swerdlow AJ, Hermon C, Jacobs PA, Alberman E, Beral V, Daker M, Fordyce A, Youings S 2001 Mortality and cancer incidence in persons with numerical sex chromosome abnormalities: a cohort study. Ann Hum Genet 65:177–188[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Lin AE, Lippe B, Rosenfeld RG 1998 Further delineation of aortic dilation, dissection, and rupture in patients with Turner syndrome. Pediatrics 102:e12
  4. Elsheikh M, Casadei B, Conway GS, Wass JA 2001 Hypertension is a major risk factor for aortic root dilatation in women with Turner’s syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 54:69–73[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Lippe B 1991 Turner syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 20:121–152[Medline]
  6. Gravholt CH, Juul S, Naeraa RW, Hansen J 1998 Morbidity in Turner syndrome. J Clin Epidemiol 51:147–158[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Ross JL, Feuillan P, Long LM, Kowal K, Kushner H, Cutler Jr GB1995 Lipid abnormalities in Turner syndrome. J Pediatr 126:242–245
  8. Elsheikh M, Conway GS 1998 The impact of obesity on cardiovascular risk factors in Turner’s syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 49:447–450[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Gravholt CH, Naeraa RW, Nyholm B, Gerdes LU, Christiansen E, Schmitz O, Christiansen JS 1998 Glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, and cardiovascular risk factors in adult Turner’s syndrome. The impact of sex hormone replacement. Diabetes Care 21:1062–1070[Abstract]
  10. van der Schouw YT, van der Graaf Y, Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans JC, Banga JD 1996 Age at menopause as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. Lancet 347:714–718[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Tomlinson JW, Holden N, Hills RK, Wheatley K, Clayton RN, Bates AS, Sheppard MC, Stewart PM 2001 Association between premature mortality and hypopituitarism. West Midlands Prospective Hypopituitary Study Group. Lancet 357:425–431[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Rosen T, Bengtsson BA 1990 Premature mortality due to cardiovascular disease in hypopituitarism. Lancet 336:285–288[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Bulow B, Hagmar L, Mikoczy Z, Nordstrom CH, Erfurth EM 1997 Increased cerebrovascular mortality in patients with hypopituitarism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 46:75–81[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Ostberg JE, Brookes JA, McCarthy C, Halcox J, Conway GS 2004 A comparison of echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging in cardiovascular screening of adults with Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:5966–5971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ho VB, Bakalov VK, Cooley M, Van PL, Hood MN, Burklow TR, Bondy CA 2004 Major vascular anomalies in Turner syndrome. Prevalence and magnetic resonance angiographic features. Circulation 110:1694–1700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Cross JM, Donald A, Vallance PJ, Deanfield JE, Woolfson RG, MacAllister RJ 2001 Dialysis improves endothelial function in humans. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:1823–1829[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Salonen JT, Salonen R 1993 Ultrasound B-mode imaging in observational studies of atherosclerotic progression. Circulation 87:II56–II65
  18. Lin AE, Lippe BM, Geffner ME, Gomes A, Lois JF, Barton CW, Rosenthal A, Friedman WF 1986 Aortic dilation, dissection, and rupture in patients with Turner syndrome. J Pediatr 109:820–826[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Allen DB, Hendricks SA, Levy JM 1986 Aortic dilation in Turner syndrome. J Pediatr 109:302–305[Medline]
  20. Le Gal G, Gourlet V, Hogrel P, Plu-Bureau G, Touboul PJ, Scarabin PY 2003 Hormone replacement therapy use is associated with a lower occurrence of carotid atherosclerotic plaques but not with intima-media thickness progression among postmenopausal women. The vascular aging (EVA) study. Atherosclerosis 166:163–170[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Sybert VP 1998 Cardiovascular malformations and complications in Turner syndrome. Pediatrics 101:E11
  22. Bordeleau L, Cwinn A, Turek M, Barron-Klauninger K, Victor G 1998 Aortic dissection and Turner’s syndrome: case report and review of the literature. J Emerg Med 16:593–596[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, Stankunavicius R, Kolettis GJ 1987 Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 316:1371–1375[Abstract]
  24. Bonithon-Kopp C, Touboul PJ, Berr C, Magne C, Ducimetiere P 1996 Factors of carotid arterial enlargement in a population aged 59 to 71 years: the EVA study. Stroke 27:654–660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gnasso A, Irace C, Mattioli PL, Pujia A 1996 Carotid intima-media thickness and coronary heart disease risk factors. Atherosclerosis 119:7–15[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Espeland MA, Applegate W, Furberg CD, Lefkowitz D, Rice L, Hunninghake D 1995 Estrogen replacement therapy and progression of intimal-medial thickness in the carotid arteries of postmenopausal women. ACAPS Investigators. Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study. Am J Epidemiol 142:1011–1019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Dubuisson JT, Wagenknecht LE, D’Agostino Jr RB, Haffner SM, Rewers M, Saad MF, Laws A, Herrington DM 1998 Association of hormone replacement therapy and carotid wall thickness in women with and without diabetes. Diabetes Care 21:1790–1796[Abstract]
  28. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Lobo RA, Shoupe D, Sevanian A, Mahrer PR, Selzer RH, Liu CR, Liu CH, Azen SP 2001 Estrogen in the prevention of atherosclerosis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 135:939–953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Byington RP, Furberg CD, Herrington DM, Herd JA, Hunninghake D, Lowery M, Riley W, Craven T, Chaput L, Ireland CC, Applegate WB 2002 Effect of estrogen plus progestin on progression of carotid atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women with heart disease: HERS B-mode substudy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22:1692–1697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hodis HN, Mack WJ 2002 Atherosclerosis imaging methods: assessing cardiovascular disease and evaluating the role of estrogen in the prevention of atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol 89:19E–27E; discussion, 27E
  31. Oliver JJ, Webb DJ 2003 Noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness and risk of atherosclerotic events. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23:554–566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Ostberg JE, Brookes J, McCarthy C, Conway GS 2003 Classification of the spectrum of aortic dysmorphology by magnetic resonance imaging in adults with Turner syndrome. Proc 22nd Joint Meeting of the British Endocrine Societies. Endocrine Abstracts, March 2003, vol. 5: OC8
  33. Nichols WW, Singh BM 2002 Augmentation index as a measure of peripheral vascular disease state. Curr Opin Cardiol 17:543–551[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, Gautier I, Laloux B, Guize L, Ducimetiere P, Benetos A 2001 Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 37:1236–1241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Mackey RH, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Vaitkevicius PV, Sakkinen PA, Lyles MF, Spurgeon HA, Lakatta EG, Kuller LH 2002 Correlates of aortic stiffness in elderly individuals: a subgroup of the Cardiovascular Health Study. Am J Hypertens 15:16–23[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Weber T, Auer J, O’Rourke MF, Kvas E, Lassnig E, Berent R, Eber B 2004 Arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and the risk of coronary artery disease. Circulation 109:184–189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Bull C, Robinson J, Deanfield JE 1994 Endothelium-dependent dilation in the systemic arteries of asymptomatic subjects relates to coronary risk factors and their interaction. J Am Coll Cardiol 24:1468–1474[Abstract]
  38. Neunteufl T, Katzenschlager R, Hassan A, Klaar U, Schwarzacher S, Glogar D, Bauer P, Weidinger F 1997 Systemic endothelial dysfunction is related to the extent and severity of coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 129:111–118[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Elsheikh M, Bird R, Casadei B, Conway GS, Wass JA 2000 The effect of hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular hemodynamics in women with Turner’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:614–618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Chan NN, Vallance P, Colhoun HM, MacAllister RJ, Hingorani AD, Conway GS 2002 The effects of hormone replacement therapy on endothelial function in women with Turner’s syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 56:615–620[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Baguet JP, Douchin S, Pierre H, Rossignol AM, Bost M, Mallion JM 2005 Structural and functional abnormalities of large arteries in Turner syndrome. Heart 2005 Mar 10 [E-published ahead of print]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJ Case ReportsHome page
M Carlson and M Silberbach
Dissection of the aorta in Turner syndrome: two cases and review of 85 cases in the literature
BMJ Case Reports, July 1, 2009; 2009(jul01_1): bcr0620091998 - bcr0620091998.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R. Formigari, G. Michielon, M. C. Digilio, G. Piacentini, A. Carotti, A. Giardini, R. M. Di Donato, and B. Marino
Genetic syndromes and congenital heart defects: how is surgical management affected?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2009; 35(4): 606 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
B. E. Hjerrild, K. H. Mortensen, and C. H. Gravholt
Turner syndrome and clinical treatment
Br. Med. Bull., June 1, 2008; 86(1): 77 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. Lopez, K. L. Arheart, S. D. Colan, N. S. Stein, G. Lopez-Mitnik, A. E. Lin, M. D. Reller, R. Ventura, and M. Silberbach
Turner Syndrome Is an Independent Risk Factor for Aortic Dilation in the Young
Pediatrics, June 1, 2008; 121(6): e1622 - e1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
M Carlson and M Silberbach
Dissection of the aorta in Turner syndrome: two cases and review of 85 cases in the literature
J. Med. Genet., December 1, 2007; 44(12): 745 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. A. Matura, V. B. Ho, D. R. Rosing, and C. A. Bondy
Aortic Dilatation and Dissection in Turner Syndrome
Circulation, October 9, 2007; 116(15): 1663 - 1670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. Bondy and for The Turner Syndrome Consensus Study Group
Care of Girls and Women with Turner Syndrome: A Guideline of the Turner Syndrome Study Group
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 10 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. Stochholm, S. Juul, K. Juel, R. W. Naeraa, and C. Hojbjerg Gravholt
Prevalence, Incidence, Diagnostic Delay, and Mortality in Turner Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3897 - 3902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ostberg, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Conway, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ostberg, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Conway, G. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Right arrow Female Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals