| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Letter to the Editor |
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
Address correspondence to: Jardena J. Puder, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail: Puderj{at}uhbs.ch.
To the editor:
We read with great interest the paper from Jayagopal et al. (1) published in 2003 in the Journal for Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. In this paper, the authors assess the biological variability of two markers of insulin resistance, the homeostasis model assessment method (HOMA-IR) and the serum concentrations of SHBG. Thereby, fasting blood samples were collected at 4-d intervals on 10 consecutive occasions from 12 overweight patients with the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and 11 age- and weight-matched healthy controls. The authors found that, in contrast to the HOMA-IR, the intraindividual variation in SHBG was lower in patients with PCOS compared with controls.
However, in healthy regularly menstruating controls, we and others found that SHBG serum concentrations indeed show menstrual cycle-specific changes with an increase of the SHBG serum concentrations in the luteal phase, in parallel with changes in estradiol concentrations (2, 3, 4, 5). We did not observe similar changes for HOMA-IR. In our healthy controls, the intraindividual variance of SHBG during the follicular phase, i.e. a time period without menstrual cycle-specific changes, was very low. Actually, the percentage of variance of SHBG explained by the within-subject variance during the follicular phase (5%) was significantly smaller than for HOMA-IR (42%; P < 0.05). In this context, it would be informative to know the differences in the intraindividual variations of SHBG serum concentrations and of HOMA-IR between patients with PCOS and healthy controls, if the authors used only the data during the follicular phase for their controls.
Footnotes
A response to this letter was invited, but the authors of the original article chose not to provide one.
Received April 12, 2005.
References
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |