help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0064
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/7/3999    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Machens, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dralle, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Machens, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dralle, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
Right arrow Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 7 3999-4003
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

Codon-Specific Development of Pheochromocytoma in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2

Andreas Machens, Michael Brauckhoff, Hans-Jürgen Holzhausen, Phuong Nguyen Thanh, Hendrik Lehnert and Henning Dralle

Departments of General, Visceral, and Vascular Surgery (A.M., M.B., P.N.T., H.D.) and Pathology (H.-J.H.), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, D-06097 Halle (Saale), Germany; and Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases (H.L.), Otto von Guericke University, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Andreas Machens, M.D., Department of General, Visceral, and Vascular Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, D-06097 Halle (Saale), Germany. E-mail: gensurg{at}medizin.uni-halle.de.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Recent data suggest a codon-specific, age-related development of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2.

Objective: The objective of this study was to delineate the codon-specific, age-related development of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2-associated pheochromocytoma.

Design: We describe a cohort study with a mean observation period of 26.9 yr.

Setting: The study took place in a tertiary referral center at a university hospital.

Patients: Included in this study were 206 consecutive carriers (74 index, 132 nonindex) operated on at this institution who harbored point mutations in the RET (rearranged during transfection) protooncogene.

Intervention: The intervention was adrenalectomy for clinically confirmed pheochromocytoma.

Main Outcome Measure: The main outcome measure was time to histopathological diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.

Results: Pheochromocytomas developed in 28% (five of 18) of carriers with mutations in codon 918, 29% (20 of 68) of carriers with mutations in codon 634, 14% (three of 21) of carriers with mutations in codon 618, 13% (two of 16) of carriers with mutations in codon 620, and 13% (two of 16) of carriers with mutations in codon 791. Earliest age of manifestation for each genotype was 22, 18, 29, 22, and 39 yr. Contralateral pheochromocytomas developed after 4 yr (one carrier each had a mutation in codon 618 or 620) and 5.2 yr (six carriers had mutations in codon 634). No pheochromocytomas were identified in carriers of mutations in codons 609 (n = 2), 611 (n = 8), 630 (n = 2), 768 (n = 8), 790 (n = 22), 804 (n = 18), and 891 (n = 7).

Conclusions: Based on these and published preliminary data, annual screening for pheochromocytoma may be warranted from age 10 yr in carriers of RET mutations in codons 918, 634, and 630, and from age 20 yr in the remainder.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ENCODING A RECEPTOR tyrosine kinase on chromosome 10q11.2, the RET (rearranged during transfection) protooncogene was identified in 1993 as the susceptibility gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 2 (1, 2). Affected tissues of neural crest derivation include thyroidal C cells and chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla, and in addition parathyroidal cells (MEN type 2a) and enteric autonomic nerve cells (MEN type 2b) (3). Susceptibility to RET activation is tissue specific: thyroidal C cells are thought to be more susceptible to RET activation than chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla (4). This concept would explain why carriers of RET genotypes that entail a weaker activity of the receptor tyrosine kinase may develop only medullary thyroid carcinomas during their lifetimes. Mutations in RET codons 609, 611, 618, 620, 634, 768, 790, 791, 804, 891, and 918 have all been associated with syndromic pheochromocytoma (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). This association remains to be demonstrated for the rare mutations in RET codons 533 and 630 (11, 12).

Recent data indicate a codon-specific, age-related progression from C cell hyperplasia to medullary thyroid carcinoma, the most common tumor associated with the MEN type 2 syndrome (5, 13, 14). Owing to the comparative rarity of pheochromocytoma among RET gene carriers, much less information has become available on the age-related development of this condition within the MEN type 2 setting. The codon-specific, familial rates of concomitant adrenal involvement (13) and the closer association between pheochromocytoma and the codon 634 RET genotype relative to codon 609, 611, 618, and 634 RET genotypes (15, 16, 17) support the notion of a codon-specific, age-related development of pheochromocytoma in RET gene carriers.

Genetic information can be harnessed to define the optimal timing of prophylactic thyroidectomy before RET gene carriers develop medullary thyroid carcinomas (5, 13, 14). Likewise, information on RET genotype may also help improve the effectiveness of screening for pheochromocytoma. This screening should be intensified during the time frame in which pheochromocytomas commonly develop. In the absence of more detailed information, routine screening is often implemented on genetic evidence of RET germline mutations, irrespective of the carrier’s age and at variable follow-up intervals. This institutional study was set up to characterize the codon-specific, age-related development of pheochromocytoma as a foundation for a cost-effective practice of evidence-based medicine.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient selection

Between November 1994 and September 2004, a total of 206 consecutive RET gene carriers underwent at this institution thyroidectomy for C cell hyperplasia or medullary thyroid carcinoma, subtotal or total adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma, or both procedures. All surgical interventions represented standard practice of care. Before surgery was undertaken, informed consent was obtained from all patients or their legal guardians. All surgical specimens were examined histopathologically. For 167 of the 206 RET gene carriers, details on age-related progression to medullary thyroid carcinoma have been published previously (14). With only two exceptions, primary thyroidectomy or thyroid reoperation were carried out at this institution, which serves as a tertiary surgical center with referrals of RET carriers from all over Germany. To minimize any impact that selective referral of RET carriers to our institution potentially might have had, all pertinent information on the RET carriers was gleaned from the referring and other institutions. Half of the 32 RET carriers underwent primary adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma at our hospital, whereas the other half were operated on at outside hospitals. Contralateral adrenalectomy for subsequent adrenal recurrence was performed elsewhere on six of eight RET carriers. Screening for pheochromocytoma was based on determination of plasma, 24-h urinary fractionated catecholamines, metanephrines, or all three. Suspected pheochromocytomas were localized through adrenal ultrasonography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scanning, or any combination of these imaging modalities.

Genetic testing

Before undergoing genetic testing, all patients or their legal guardians, respectively, had given informed consent in accordance with institutional guidelines and national regulations that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki. For the identification of germline mutations in the RET protooncogene, genomic DNA was purified from peripheral blood leukocytes using standard techniques. Genomic DNA was amplified by the PCR with the use of oligonucleotide primers for exons 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, and 16. Single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and direct sequencing were performed according to national laboratory regulations for RET analysis.

Statistical analysis

To ensure unbiased time-to-event estimates, all analyses were stratified by RET genotype and risk category, respectively. Genomic information and patient age at first histopathological diagnosis were related to thyroid (medullary thyroid carcinoma) and adrenal medullary histopathology (pheochromocytoma) to explore the codon-specific, age-related development of pheochromocytoma. Time to diagnosis of either tumor was calculated for each RET genotype (or RET risk category) using the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated with the log-rank test (18).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Histopathological findings stratified by RET genotype

There were 74 index and 132 nonindex RET gene carriers. Three RET risk categories were devised based on the 1999 consensus statement (5), with minor adaptations to accommodate recent literature (8, 12, 19) (Table 1Go): during the mean observation period of 15.8, 24.7, and 33.3 yr since birth, respectively, pheochromocytomas had developed in 28% of RET carriers in the highest-risk category (mutations in codon 918), in 21% of RET carriers in the high-risk category (mutations in codons 634, 630, 609, 611, 618, 620), and 3% of RET carriers in the least high-risk category (mutations in codon 768, 790, 791, 804, 891). There were no extraadrenal pheochromocytomas. Pheochromocytomas developed in 28% of carriers with mutations in codon 918, 29% of carriers with mutations in codon 634, 14% of carriers with mutations in codon 618, 13% of carriers with mutations in codon 620, and 13% of carriers with mutations in codon 791. Among the 32 RET gene carriers with pheochromocytoma, only a single patient (3%), a 54-yr-old carrier of a mutation in codon 634 reported elsewhere (20), harbored a malignant pheochromocytoma with liver metastases. No pheochromocytomas were identified in carriers of mutations in codons 609, 611, 630, 768, 790, 804, and 891. The temporal relationship between pheochromocytoma and medullary thyroid carcinoma varied according to RET risk category: Whereas pheochromocytomas occurred only synchronously or metachronously in the highest-risk category, they emerged equally often in the high-risk category before, together with, or after medullary thyroid carcinoma. In the least-high category, conversely, pheochromocytomas exclusively preceded medullary thyroid carcinoma. In the entire RET population, medullary thyroid cancers were found four times more often (135 to 32) than pheochromocytomas.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Histopathological findings stratified by RET genotype

 
Time to pheochromocytoma stratified by RET risk category

Time to diagnosis of pheochromocytoma (Table 2Go, upper panel) differed significantly according to RET risk category with means of 26.4 (highest risk), 34.9 (high risk), and 46.5 yr (least high risk). A similar, although less blunted, pattern was seen when time to diagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma was stratified by RET risk category: 14.3 (highest risk), 30.1 (high risk), and 51.6 yr (least high risk). On average, medullary thyroid carcinomas preceded pheochromocytomas by 12.1 (highest risk) and 4.8 yr (high risk), respectively, but lagged behind by 5.1 yr in the least-high risk category.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Time to pheochromocytoma and medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) stratified by RET risk category

 
Increments between the RET risk categories

Mean increments from one RET risk category to another were calculated separately for either tumor (Table 2Go, lower panel). For each increment in RET risk category, pheochromocytoma to medullary thyroid carcinoma ratios were calculated: all three ratios approximated 54%. This finding suggests that chromaffin adrenal medullary cells may have 54% of the susceptibility to RET activation that have thyroidal C cells.

Time to contralateral pheochromocytoma after unilateral adrenalectomy

On primary adrenalectomy, bilateral pheochromocytomas were noted in two of 18 carriers (11%) of mutations in codon 918, six of 68 carriers (9%) of mutations in codon 634, and one of 21 carriers (5%) of codon 618 mutations (Table 3Go). Contralateral pheochromocytomas developed in six of 62 carriers (10%) of codon 634 mutations at a mean interval of 5.2 yr after unilateral adrenalectomy and 4 yr each after primary adrenalectomy in one of 21 carriers (5%) of mutations in codon 618 and one of 16 carriers (6%) carriers with mutations in codon 620 (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Time to contralateral pheochromocytoma after unilateral adrenalectomy

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DNA-based predictive testing for RET germline mutations has offered not only the opportunity of timely prophylactic thyroidectomy but also the chance of early screening for pheochromocytoma in RET gene carriers. Owing to the rarity of the latter condition, uncertainty exists regarding both the optimal onset and intensity of screening for pheochromocytomas in this setting. To reduce patient inconvenience and improve the effectiveness of surveillance, it is important to tailor the screening intervals to the natural development of pheochromocytoma in RET gene carriers.

DNA-based timing of screening for pheochromocytoma

In a worst-case scenario, routine surveillance should be implemented before the earliest manifestation of pheochromocytoma (youngest patient age ever reported), taking the individual RET genotype into account. Table 4Go summarizes our preliminary institutional experience and the international literature: Considering the present and limited body of clinical evidence (6, 9, 10, 13, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27) along with in vitro data from cell transfection experiments (28, 29), it may be warranted to initiate screening for pheochromocytoma at age 10 yr in carriers of mutations in codons 918, 634, and possibly 630 and age 20 yr in the remainder (Table 4Go). As more clinical information is forthcoming, further modifications of this scheme are likely to be needed, especially with regard to carriers of RET genotypes that do not involve mutations in codons 918 or 634. The 1999 consensus statement proposes the age of thyroidectomy (5–7 yr) or an age of 15 yr as the starting point for annual determination of urine metanephrines with imaging every 3–5 yr, regardless of RET genotype (5). Alternatively, if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of our preliminary data were used (Table 2Go, upper panel), biochemical surveillance would have to commence in the highest RET risk category (mutations in codon 918) with age 20 yr and in the high and least high RET risk category (mutations in codons 618, 620, 634, 791) with age 30 yr. This alternative approach does not seem viable, considering the current paucity of observations for most RET genotypes and a recent account of malignant pheochromocytoma in a 21-yr-old carrier of the codon 634 RET germline mutation (30). The individual RET genotypes within a single RET risk category share a broadly comparative transforming activity during in vitro transfection experiments (Table 4Go) and a similar mechanism of RET activation (3): alteration of the intracellular substrate recognition pocket of the catalytic core (highest-risk category), extracellular ligand-independent dimerization and cross-phosphorylation (high-risk category), and interference with intracellular ATP binding (least-high category).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Earliest manifestation of pheochromocytoma stratified by RET genotype

 
Limitations of the DNA-based approach

In a MEN type 2b transfection mouse model mimicking the high RET risk group (mutation in codon 918), pheochromocytomas developed through chromaffin cell hyperplasia of the adrenal medulla (31). In keeping with this notion, two 5- and 8-yr-old MEN type 2b carriers who underwent bilateral adrenalectomy for an elevated urinary vanillylmandelic acid to creatinine ratio on initial screening displayed adrenal medullary hyperplasia but not yet pheochromocytomas (32). Pheochromocytomas may occur by a second hit that causes a dominant effect on the mutant RET allele, through loss of the normal wild-type RET or through amplification of mutant RET by trisomy 10 (33). Alternative somatic mutations involve deletion of the von Hippel-Lindau gene (34) or allelic loss at chromosome 1p (35). Owing to the unpredictability of the timing of somatic hits required for malignant progression, there may be some risk of earlier progression to pheochromocytoma beyond that delineated by our preliminary data.

Conclusion

Correct ascertainment of a RET gene carrier’s lifelong risk of developing pheochromocytomas is critically dependent on the total length of follow-up. The mean follow-up since birth of our RET gene carriers (Table 1Go), 64% of whom were nonindex patients, would have to be extended by an additional 10–13 yr to reach the mean time span required to develop pheochromocytomas (Table 2Go, upper panel). For carriers of the codon 634 genotype, this is likely to raise our pheochromocytoma rate of 29% to the published rates of 50–57% (5, 36). Ideally, screening for pheochromocytoma should be implemented at an interval that is related to the genetically encoded risk. Further research is needed to clarify whether the proposed annual screening intervals (5) can be extended to 2-yr intervals without compromising safety in carriers of RET genotypes that entail a lesser degree of RET activation. This is even more important as cortical-sparing adrenalectomy in RET gene carriers is increasingly gaining favor over bilateral adrenalectomy (37, 38). Minimizing the risk of Addisonian crisis, these surgical procedures leave behind adrenal medullary remnants. In RET gene carriers, adrenal remnants require lifelong monitoring, as do virgin contralateral adrenal glands, because of their capability of giving rise to additional pheochromocytomas in 10% of carriers (38).


    Footnotes
 
First Published Online April 12, 2005

Abbreviations: MEN, Multiple endocrine neoplasia; RET, rearranged during transfection.

Received January 12, 2005.

Accepted April 6, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Donis-Keller H, Dou S, Chi D, Carlson KM, Toshima K, Lairmore TC, Howe JR, Moley JF, Goodfellow P, Wells SA 1993 Mutations of the RET proto-oncogene are associated with MEN 2A and FMTC. Hum Mol Genet 2:851–856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Mulligan LM, Kwok JB, Healey CS, Elsdon MJ, Eng C, Gardner E, Love DR, Mole SE, Moore JK, Papi L, Ponder MA, Telenius H, Tunnacliffe A, Ponder BAJ 1993 Germline mutations of the RET proto-oncogene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. Nature 363:458–460[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Eng C 1996 The RET proto-oncogene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and Hirschsprung’s disease. N Engl J Med 335:943–951[Free Full Text]
  4. Jhiang SM 2000 The RET proto-oncogene in human cancers. Oncogene 19:5590–5597[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Brandi ML, Gagel RF, Angeli A, Bilezikian JP, Beck-Peccoz P, Bordi C, Conte-Devolx B, Falchetti A, Gheri RG, Libroia A, Lips CJM, Lombardi G, Mannelli M, Pacini F, Ponder BAJ, Raue F, Skogseid B, Tamburrano G, Thakker RV, Thompson NW, Tomassetti P, Tonelli F, Wells SA, Marx SJ 2001 Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5658–5671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Aiello A, Cioni K, Gobbo M, Collini P, Gullo M, Della Torre G, Passerini E, Ferrando B, Pilotti S, Pierotti MA, Pasini B 2005 The familial medullary thyroid carcinoma-associated RET E768D mutation in a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A case. Surgery 137:574–576[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Berndt I, Reuter M, Saller B, Frank-Raue K, Groth P, Grußendorf M, Raue F, Ritter MM, Höppner W 1998 A new hot spot for mutations in the ret protooncogene causing familial medullary thyroid carcinoma and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:770–774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Igaz P, Patocs A, Rácz K, Klein I, Váradi A, Esik O 2002 Occurrence of pheochromocytoma in a MEN2A family with codon 609 mutation of the RET protooncogene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:2994[Free Full Text]
  9. Jimenez C, Habra MA, Huang SC, El-Naggar A, Shapiro SE, Evans DB, Cote G, Gagel RF 2004 Pheochromocytoma and medullary thyroid carcinoma: a new genotype-phenotype correlation of the RET protooncogene 891 germline mutation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:4142–4145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Scacheri PC, Crabtree JS, Kennedy AL, Swain GP, Ward JM, Marx SJ, Spiegel AM, Collins FS 2004 V804M RET mutation in MEN 2 A: first report. J Intern Med 255:712
  11. Alvares da Silva AM, Maciel RMB, Dias da Silva MR, Toledo SRC, de Carvalho MB, Cerutti JM 2003 A novel germ-line point mutation in RET exon 8 (Gly533Cys) in a large kindred with familial medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:5438–5443[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Machens A, Schneyer U, Holzhausen HJ, Raue F, Dralle H 2004 Emergence of medullary thyroid carcinoma in a family with the Cys630Arg RET germline mutation. Surgery 136:1089–1093
  13. Machens A, Niccoli-Sire P, Högel J, Frank-Raue K, van Vroonhoven TJ, Roeher HD, Wahl RA, Lamesch P, Raue F, Conte-Devolx B, Dralle H, for the European Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia (EUROMEN) Study Group 2003 Early malignant progression of hereditary medullary thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med 349:1517–1525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Machens A, Holzhausen HJ, Thanh PN, Dralle H 2003 Malignant progression from C-cell hyperplasia to medullary thyroid carcinoma in 167 carriers of RET germline mutations. Surgery 134:425–431[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Mulligan LM; Marsh DJ, Robinson BG, Schuffenecker I, Zedenius J, Lips CJM, Gagel RF, Takai SI, Noll WW, Fink M, Raue F, Lacroix A, Thibodeau SN, Frilling A, Ponder BAJ, Eng C, for the International RET Mutation Consortium 1995 Genotype-phenotype correlation in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: report of the International RET Mutation Consortium. J Intern Med 238:343–346[Medline]
  16. Frank-Raue K, Höppner W, Frilling A, Kotzerke J, Dralle H, Haase R, Mann K, Seif F, Kirchner R, Rendl J, Deckart HF, Ritter MM, Hampel R, Klempa J, Scholz GH, Raue F 1996 Mutations of the ret protooncogene in German multiple endocrine neoplasia families: relation between genotype and phenotype. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1780–1783[Abstract]
  17. Eng C, Clayton D, Schuffenecker I, Lenoir G, Cote G, Gagel RF, Ploos van Amstel HK, Lips CJM, Nishisho I, Takai SI, Marsh DJ, Robinson BG, Frank-Raue K, Raue F, Xue F, Noll WW, Romei C, Pacini F, Fink M, Niederle B, Zedenius J, Nordenskjöld M, Komminoth P, Hendy GN, Gharib H, Thibodeau SN, Lacroix A, Frilling A, Ponder BAJ, Mulligan LM 1996 The relationship between specific RET proto-oncogene mutations and disease phenotype in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. JAMA 276:1575–1579[Abstract]
  18. Kaplan EL, Meier P 1958 Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481[CrossRef]
  19. Simon S, Pavel M, Hensen J, Berg J, Hummer HP, Carbon R 2002 Multiple endocrine neoplasia 2A syndrome. Surgical management. J Pediatr Surg 37:897–900[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Machens A, Behrmann C, Dralle H 2000 Chemoembolization of liver metastases from medullary thyroid carcinoma. Ann Intern Med 132:596–597[Free Full Text]
  21. Nguyen L, Niccoli-Sire P, Caron P, Bastie D, Maes B, Chabrier G, Chabre O, Rohmer V, Lecomte P, Henry J, Conte-Devolx B and the French Calcitonin Tumors Study Group (GETC) 2001 Pheochromocytoma in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: a prospective study. Eur J Endocrinol 144:37–44[Abstract]
  22. Zakrzewska A, Makowska AM, Bar-Andziak E 2004 [Late onset of medullary thyroid carcinoma with bilateral adrenal pheochromocytomas in the case of patient with MEN 2]. Pol Merkuriusz Lek 17:633–637 (Polish)[Medline]
  23. Beck O, Fassbender WJ, Beyer P, Kriener S, Neumann HP, Klingebiel T, Lehrnbecher T 2004 Pheochromocytoma in childhood: implication for further diagnostic procedures. Acta Paediatr 93:1630–1634[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Neocleous V, Passalaris T, Spanou E, Kitsios P, Skordis N, Constantinou Deltas C 2004 Description of the first two seemingly unrelated Greek Cypriot families with a common C618R RET proto-oncogene mutation. Genet Test 8:163–168[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Oishi S, Sato T, Takiguchi-Shirahama S, Nakamura Y 1995 Mutations of the RET proto-oncogene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (Sipple’s syndrome). Endocr J 42:527–536[Medline]
  26. Rodien P, Jeunemaitre X, Dumont C, Beldjord C, Plouin PF 1997 Genetic alterations of the RET proto-oncogene in familial and sporadic pheochromocytomas. Horm Res 47:263–268[Medline]
  27. Colombo-Benkmann M, Brämswig J, Höppner W, Gellner R, Hengst K, Böcker W, Senninger N 2002 Surgical strategy in a kindred with a rare RET protooncogene mutation of variable penetrance with regard to multiple endocrine neoplasia. World J Surg 26:1286–1290[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Iwashita T, Kato M, Murakami H, Asai N, Ishiguro Y, Ito S, Iwata Y, Kawai K, Asai M, Kurokawa K, Kajita H, Takahashi M 1999 Biological and biochemical properties of Ret with kinase domain mutations identified in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma. Oncogene 18:3919–3922[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Ito S, Iwashita T, Asai N, Murakami H, Iwata Y, Sobue G, Takahashi M 1997 Biological properties of RET with cysteine mutations correlate with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A, familial medullary thyroid carcinoma, and Hirschsprung’s disease phenotype. Cancer Res 57:2870–2872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Ku CF, Lo CY, Chan WF, Chiu SW, Fan ST, Lam KSL 2005 Resection of phaeochromocytoma extending into the right atrium in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. Hong Kong Med J 11:59–62[Medline]
  31. Smith-Hicks CL, Sizer KC, Powers JF, Tischler AS, Costantini F 2000 C-cell hyperplasia, pheochromocytoma and sympathoadrenal malformation in a mouse model of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B. EMBO J 19:612–622[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Decker RA, Toyama WM, O’Neal LW, Telander RL, Wells Jr SA 1990 Evaluation of children with multiple endocrine neoplasia type IIb following thyroidectomy. J Pediatr Surg 25:939–943[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Huang SC, Koch CA, Vortmeyer AO, Pack SD, Lichtenauer UD, Mannan P, Lubensky IA, Chrousos GP, Gagel RF, Pacak K, Zhuang Z 2000 Duplication of the mutant RET allele in trisomy 10 or loss of the wild-type allele in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2-associated pheochromocytomas. Cancer Res 60:6223–6226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Koch CA, Huang SC, Zhuang Z, Stolle C, Azumi N, Chrousos GP, Vortmeyer AO, Pacak K 2002 Somatic VHL gene deletion and point mutation in MEN 2A-associated pheochromocytoma. Oncogene 21:479–482[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Benn DE, Dwight T, Richardson AL, Delbridge L, Bambach CP, Stowasser M, Gordon RD, Marsh DJ, Robinson BG 2000 Sporadic and familial pheochromocytomas are associated with loss of at least two discrete intervals on chromosome 1p. Cancer Res 60:7048–7051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Iihara M, Yamashita T, Okamoto T, Kanbe M, Yamazaki K, Egawa SI, Yamaguchi K, Obara T 1997 A nationwide clinical survey of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 27:128–134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Brauckhoff M, Gimm O, Thanh PN, Bär A, Ukkat J, Brauckhoff K, Bönsch T, Dralle H 2003 Critical size of residual adrenal tissue and recovery from impaired early postoperative adrenocortical function after subtotal bilateral adrenalectomy. Surgery 134:1020–1028[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Yip L, Lee JE, Shapiro SE, Waguespack SG, Sherman SI, Hoff AO, Gagel RF, Arens J, Evans DB 2004 Surgical management of hereditary pheochromocytoma. J Am Coll Surg 198:525–535[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
E. Korpershoek, B.-J. Petri, F. H van Nederveen, W. N M Dinjens, A. A Verhofstad, W. W de Herder, S. Schmid, A. Perren, P. Komminoth, and R. R de Krijger
Candidate gene mutation analysis in bilateral adrenal pheochromocytoma and sympathetic paraganglioma
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 453 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
R. Asari, C. Scheuba, K. Kaczirek, and B. Niederle
Estimated Risk of Pheochromocytoma Recurrence After Adrenal-Sparing Surgery in Patients With Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2A
Arch Surg, December 1, 2006; 141(12): 1199 - 1205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
D. E BENN, A. L. RICHARDSON, D. J MARSH, and B. G ROBINSON
Genetic testing in pheochromocytoma- and paraganglioma-associated syndromes.
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., August 1, 2006; 1073: 104 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
A. MACHENS, M. BRAUCKHOFF, O. GIMM, and H. DRALLE
Risk-Oriented Approach to Hereditary Adrenal Pheochromocytoma.
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., August 1, 2006; 1073: 417 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. W. B. de Groot, T. P. Links, J. T. M. Plukker, C. J. M. Lips, and R. M. W. Hofstra
RET as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Target in Sporadic and Hereditary Endocrine Tumors
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2006; 27(5): 535 - 560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/7/3999    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Machens, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dralle, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Machens, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dralle, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
Right arrow Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals