help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM ENDO 08
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Correction for Palomba et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89 (10) 4801-4809.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 7 3945
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society


Announcement and Resource

Erratum

In the article "Metformin Administration versus Laparoscopic Ovarian Diathermy in Clomiphene Citrate-Resistant Women with Polycyctic Ovary Syndrome: A Prospective Parallel Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial" by S. Palomba, F. Orio Jr., L. G. Nardo, A. Falbo, T. Russo, D. Corea, P. Doldo, G. Lombardi, A. Tolino, A. Colao, and F. Zullo (The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 89:4801–4809), errors appear in one author’s institutional affiliation and in data reported in Tables 2 and 3.

On the title page (page 4801), the correct affiliation of Dr. Luciano Giovanni Nardo is Department of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UK.

In the Abstract (page 4801, lines 18–20), the correct data for ovulation rate in group B is 53.2%, whereas the correct data for pregnancy, abortion, and live-birth rates for group A are 21.8%, 9.3%, and 86.0%, respectively.

In Results (page 4805, right column, lines 2–16), the correct data are: 197 as total number of cycles in group A; 53.2% as ovulation rate in group B, and 21.8%, 9.3%, and 86.0% as pregnancy, abortion, and live-birth rates for group A, respectively; 79.6% (43/54) as cumulative pregnancy rate for group A; 3 of 11 as patients of group A having regular ovulatory menstrual cycles at the end of the study. In the Table 2 (page 4805), the correct data are 25/54 (46.3), 23/46 (50.0), 20/36 (55.6), 17/26 (65.4), 13/20 (65.0), 10/15 (66.7) for the ovulation rates of group A during the six cycles of treatment, while for the pregnancy rates of group A during the 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th cycle the respective correct data are 10/36 (27.8), 6/26 (23.1), 5/20 (25.0), and 4/15 (26.7); all comparisons between two groups are not significant. In the Table 3 (page 4805), the correct data are 108/197 (54.8), 43/197 (21.8), 4/43 (9.4), and 37/43 (86.0), respectively, for ovulation, pregnancy, abortion, and live-birth rates in group A.

The authors regret the errors.

*The Editors appreciated the assistance of E. M. Kolibianakis, E. G. Papanikolaou, and B. C. Tarlatzis for bringing these errors to the Journal and authors’ attention.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals