help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2004-2401
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/7/3830    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Redman, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Redman, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
Right arrow Metabolism
Right arrow Obesity
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 7 3830-3837
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

Effect of a Synthetic Progestin on the Exercise Status of Sedentary Young Women

Leanne M. Redman, Garry C. Scroop, Goran Westlander and Robert J. Norman

Exercise Physiology Research Unit (L.M.R.), Discipline of Physiology, and Reproductive Medicine Unit (L.M.R., G.W., R.J.N.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide; and Department of Thoracic Medicine (G.C.S.), Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Leanne M. Redman, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808-4124. E-mail: Leanne.Redman{at}PBRC.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: The impact of progestins on exercise performance in women has not been previously studied.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a synthetic progestin on aspects of exercise status in young women.

Design, Patients, Setting: Twenty-three young, healthy, habitually sedentary women participated in a single-blind, randomized, counterbalanced, cross-over study in a university-based laboratory setting.

Intervention: Two monophasic oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) were administered in which the dose of the synthetic progestin, norethisterone, was 2-fold different but the dose of the synthetic estrogen, ethinyl estradiol, was constant. During each month of OCP aspects of exercise status were assessed during incremental exercise to exhaustion and steady-state submaximal exercise and with a performance test.

Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were peak oxygen uptake (O2peak), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), time to exhaustion, lactate concentrations, and total work done.

Results: Peak heart rates were approximately 95% of age-predicted values with both OCP preparations, whereas O2peak was approximately 30% above age-predicted values. Peak postincremental exercise plasma lactate concentrations exceeded those reported for males and females, whereas the RER was below expected values throughout both incremental and steady-state exercise. The effects on O2peak and RER were increased with the higher dose progestin OCP, as were exercise time to exhaustion and total work done.

Conclusion: Synthetic progestins in OCP formulations can have a significant effect on the exercise status of young, sedentary women, possibly through an effect on stroke volume and a shift in the principal energy substrate used during exercise from carbohydrate to lipid.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE RESULTS OF a previous study in our laboratory during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle of sedentary young women (1) support the notion that when estrogens and progestins are high, lipid is favored (2, 3, 4, 5) and glycogen spared (6, 7, 8) as fuels for generating energy during exercise. This hormone environment has also been reported to improve exercise performance by increasing exercise time to exhaustion (9, 10, 11, 12) and improving running economy (13, 14). Apart from the menstrual cycle, the circulating concentrations of estrogens and progestins can be manipulated with the oral contraceptive pill (OCP). By inhibiting the synthesis of endogenous female sex steroids from the ovary (15), the circulating synthetic sex steroid concentrations can be controlled by the OCP dose administered (16) and their effects on both exercise performance and energy metabolism studied.

The specific mechanism by which female sex steroids alter energy metabolism is not known. In those studies in which synthetic sex steroids have been administered, either the dose of progestin has been kept constant while varying the dose of estrogen (17) or the doses of the two synthetic hormones varied concurrently (8). From these studies, several estrogen-mediated hypotheses have been proposed, including increased glycogenesis and lipolysis and inhibition of gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis (for review, see Ref. 18). There appear to be no studies that have implemented a similar regimen whereby the dose of estrogen is fixed and the dose of progestin modified, despite attempts to define a potential role of progestins (8, 17). This is surprising, given that, in comparison with 17ß-estradiol, progesterone has greater fluctuations during the menstrual cycle, with mean concentrations some 20-fold different between the two cycle phases.

The present study has been designed to investigate the effects of a synthetic progestin on the exercise status of a single group of sedentary young women in a single blind, randomized, and cross-over design. Two monophasic OCPs were administered whereby the dose of estrogen was constant but the dose of progestin varied 2-fold. In both hormone environments, aspects of exercise status were assessed during incremental exercise to exhaustion and steady-state submaximal exercise and with a performance test.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

Twenty-six healthy females aged 18–30 yr, recruited by advertisement, matched the inclusion criteria for this study, namely, taking an OCP for at least 6 months before the study, regular menstruation with OCP use, nonsmoker, not pregnant, not taking any other prescription medication, and a sedentary lifestyle. Subjects met this final inclusion criterion if their occupation did not require physical labor and they did not perform structured physical activity, i.e. exercise, more than once a week (19). Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant; became pregnant; did not comply with normal directions of OCP use; were smokers; or had any history of the following: asthma, diabetes, hypertension, deep vein thrombosis or blood clots, angina, epilepsy, breast, ovary or cervical cancer, or any other endocrine or cardiovascular abnormalities. All subjects completed a questionnaire that assessed general health, gynecological health, and oral contraceptive pill history, and if no other potential contraindications to exercise testing or changing the nature of the current OCP were identified, the subjects were provided with a 1-month supply of two OCP treatments. All subjects were blinded to the nature of the OCP treatments, and the name and contents of each OCP provided could not be identified from the packaging. Before the study commencement, three subjects withdrew due to illness. All data shown are therefore for 23 subjects (age 22.6 ± 3.5 yr; height 1.7 ± 0.1 m; body mass 70.7 ± 7.6 kg; body mass index 24.0 ± 2.9 kg·m2; mean ± SD). The University of Adelaide Human Research Ethics Committee approved the study, and subjects provided written consent after provision of a written and oral explanation of the procedures, protocols, and risks entailed.

Experimental design

Subjects were required to change the nature of their current OCP to a commercially available combined monophasic OCP (Pharmacia, Ellerslie, Auckland, Australia) that contained either 35 µg ethinyl estradiol and 500 µg norethisterone (Brevinor), described in this study as "low P", or 35 µg ethinyl estradiol and 1000 µg norethisterone (Brevinor-1), described in this study as "high P". The order of OCP administration was assigned at random and counterbalanced (using a random number generator, Microsoft Excel for Windows 2000, Redmond, CA) such that 13 subjects began with low P and 10 subjects began with high P. To assess the effectiveness of the OCP and subject compliance to the OCP protocols, all women reported between pill d 10–15 in each OCP cycle in which levels of endogenous 17ß-estradiol and progesterone were measured. In addition, subjects were provided with an OCP diary that required a daily entry for the time of pill ingestion, missed pills, breakthrough bleeding, and menstrual bleeding. With this experimental design, any carryover effect of the subject’s previous OCP was considered unlikely given: 1) 7 d of inert or sugar pill ingestion and menstruation elapsed before administration of the new OCP; 2) the relatively short half-life (13–27 h) of synthetic sex steroids (20); or 3) as with most sex steroids, the new OCP would likely to have reached stable blood concentrations after 5 d of continuous administration (21) at which time the exercise tests were conducted. It is possible however that longer-term metabolic changes induced by the OCP may influence some of the results.

Exercise testing

Subjects were required to attend the laboratory on five separate occasions for an exercise familiarization session and four exercise testing sessions. Exercise tests were completed at the same time of day for each subject to minimize diurnal variation and were separated by at least 10 d to ensure adequate recovery. All exercise tests took place between 0800 and 1600 h. The number of hours from daily pill ingestion to the time of the exercise test was between 2 and 8 h (when the level of the synthetic steroids is expected to have reached steady-state) (21) and was controlled for each subject. Each subject performed an incremental exercise test to exhaustion (incremental exercise test), a steady-state submaximal exercise test, and performance test in each OCP cycle. The incremental exercise tests were completed on pill d 5–7 and the submaximal exercise and performance tests on pill d 15–17, in which d 1 represents the first day of active or hormone pill ingestion.

On the day of testing, each subject reported to the laboratory after a 4-h fast (water only) having abstained from alcohol, caffeine, and strenuous physical activity for the previous 24 h. All subjects were required to complete a 48-h dietary log during the 48-h period before the first exercise test, and all food and drink consumed within this period was self-measured and recorded. The food intake was analyzed for total caloric intake (kilojoules) and relative contributions of carbohydrate, fat, and protein (expressed in grams and as a percentage of total caloric intake) using the SERVE Nutrition Management System for Windows, 1995 (M. H. Williams Pty. Ltd., St. Ives, Australia). Subjects were required to replicate their exact dietary intakes 48 h before each subsequent exercise testing session.

On arrival in the laboratory for each exercise testing session, body mass was measured, chest electrodes applied for electrocardiographic and heart rate (HR) monitoring, and a rubefacient cream (Finalgon, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was applied to the right earlobe for capillary blood sampling. After 10 min of seated rest, a capillary blood sample was collected the subject was then comfortably seated on a precalibrated cycle ergometer, and a low-resistance respiratory valve and nose clip were fitted to enable gas exchange measurements.

Protocols

Incremental exercise to exhaustion. All subjects completed an incremental exercise test to exhaustion to determine peak oxygen uptake (O2peak) and the lactate and ventilation thresholds. After a 5-min rest period, exercise began with 2 min of unloaded cycling (0 W) at 50 revolutions·min–1, and thereafter the power output was incremented by 25 W every 2 min until, despite strong vocal exhortation, the subject could not maintain the target pedal cadence.

Steady-state submaximal exercise at 75% O2peak and performance test. The absolute workload corresponding to 75% O2peak was determined from individual regression analyses of workload against relative exercise intensity (%O2peak) for each OCP. After a 5-min rest period, exercise began at a workload corresponding to a relative exercise intensity of 75% of each subject’s OCP-specific O2peak and continued for 20 min, at which time subjects were instructed to perform a maximal effort until fatigue. This was the performance test, with time to exhaustion, maximal HR, peak power output, and total work done identified as performance indices.

Cardiorespiratory measurements. During all exercise tests, subjects wore a nose clip and breathed through a low-resistance unidirectional respiratory valve (model R2700; Hans Rudolph, Kansas City, MO) with a precalibrated, high-flow, turbine transducer (P. K. Morgan, London, UK) attached to the inspiratory port. The respiratory valve was held in place by a head support (Hans Rudolph head-support for Rudolph valves, model 2766). Expired air was directed via 1 m of large bore tubing (Clean-Bore, Vacumed, Ventura, CA) to a 2.6-liter mixing chamber (Sportech, Canberra, Australia) from which dried gas was sampled continuously (~700 ml·min–1) and passed through a fast response zirconia oxide O2 analyzer (Rapid Zr, Benchmark, Morgan, UK) and a fast-response nondirectional infrared absorption CO2 analyzer (LB-2, Beckman, Palo Alto, CA) to determine the fractional concentrations of expired gases. Volume calibration was performed before each test using a known volume standard (1 liter) passed through the system 10 times at various flow rates. Calibration was repeated if the error was greater than 2%. The gas analyzers were calibrated before each exercise test with two commercially prepared precision gas mixtures of known O2 and CO2 percentages (BOC Gases, Ryde, Australia) covering the physiological range of measurement. The ventilometer and gas analyzers were interfaced with an IBM-compatible computer that performed all of the necessary calculations using standard algorithms and Labview-based software (metabolic analyzer, ICON Technologies, Victoria Park, Australia) to calculate 30-sec averages of the expired fractions of O2 (FeO2) and CO2 (FeCO2) and minute ventilation (E), oxygen uptake (O2), and carbon dioxide production (CO2) based on the minute volume (I).

The respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was calculated as CO2 divided by O2 and tidal volume (liters) and breathing frequency (fR, breaths·min–1) were also displayed as 30-sec averages. HR (beats·min–1) was recorded continuously as consecutive 5-sec averages. O2peak was designated as the mean O2 of the minute in which the highest 30-sec epoch value was recorded and was expressed in both absolute terms (liters·min–1) and with respect to total body mass (milliliters·kg–1·min–1). Incremental exercise tests were accepted for analysis if subjects achieved within 10% of their sex- and age-predicted O2max (22) or within 11 beats· min–1 of their age-predicted HRmax. The entire metabolic gas analyzer was validated using an automated O2max calibrator (23), and the intraclass correlation coefficient for O2, CO2, and E were 2.0, 2.2, and 1.8%, respectively.

Blood sampling. All blood assays performed during the exercise tests were performed on capillary blood collected from an arterialized earlobe. During the incremental exercise test, 50-µl capillary blood samples were collected in the last 30 sec of each 2-min workload during the test and every min for 10 min post exercise. Throughout the 20 min of steady-state exercise, a 50-µl capillary blood sample was collected in the last 30 sec of each 5-min interval. No samples were taken during the performance test, but on completion capillary blood was collected at 1, 5, and 10 min post exercise.

Blood analyses

Blood concentrations of 17ß-estradiol and progesterone were measured from 5 ml of whole venous blood collected into glass syringes rinsed with sodium heparin (500 IU·ml) and immediately dispensed into a tube containing lithium heparin gel. Blood samples were kept on ice until centrifuged (model TJ-6R refrigerated centrifuge, Beckman) at 4000 x g for 15 min at 4 C, and the plasma was separated and frozen at –20 C for subsequent assay. All samples were thawed and mixed thoroughly in an automixer (Vortex, Chiltern Scientific, Sydney, Australia) and concentrations determined in duplicate in the one assay run using an automated chemiluminescent competitive assay system (ADVIA Centaur System, Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NJ). The intraassay and interassay coefficients of variation for 17ß-estradiol ranged from 5.0 to 7.4% and 4.5 to 8.1%, respectively, and progesterone ranged from 3.2 to 7.2% and 1.9 to 5.7%, respectively. Lactate and glucose concentrations were analyzed immediately (within 2 min) from 50 µl of whole blood in the ABL System 620 (Radiometer Medical, Copenhagen, Denmark) analyzer.

Data analysis

The changes in O2 (liters·min–1) with increasing exercise intensity (expressed as a percentage of the workload at exhaustion, %WLpeak) and the changes in workload, HR, CO2, and RER with increasing exercise intensity (expressed as %O2peak) were modeled as linear regression equations. For each subject, the values for workload, O2, HR, CO2, and RER, which corresponded, respectively, to consecutive 10% increments in WLpeak or O2peak were predicted from the slope and intercept of each linear regression equation. For each comparison, the coefficient of determination (r2) and the mean squared error (MSE) were calculated to examine the goodness of fit between the observed data and the data predicted by the linear regression model.

The changes in E and plasma lactate concentration with increasing exercise intensity (%O2peak) were modeled for each subject as single exponential functions given by the equation:

where, at a given percentage of O2peak (x), y is the predicted value for E, or plasma lactate concentration, and a, b, and c are mathematical parameters estimated by minimizing the residual sum of squares between the values for E, and plasma lactate concentration and the curve fit (24). For each comparison, the r2 and the MSE were calculated to examine the goodness of fit between the observed data and the data predicted by the exponential model.

Lactate threshold and ventilation threshold determination

This was determined according to the method of Beaver et al. (25) using Excel (Microsoft Excel, version 4.0) macros developed specifically for this purpose. The plasma lactate concentration vs. O2 data and the E vs. O2 data were transformed into logarithms. The log-log relationships were plotted and regression lines fitted through the upper and lower segments of the resultant plots while minimizing the residual sum of squares. The lactate threshold and ventilation thresholds were designated as the O2 corresponding with the point of intersection (expressed as O2 liters·min–1, %O2peak) of the two regression lines that yielded the lowest overall residual sum of squares. For each subject, the r2 and the MSE were calculated to examine the goodness of fit of the observed data to the logarithmic model. The power output and HR corresponding to the O2 at the lactate threshold and the ventilation threshold were also determined from linear regression equations of O2 vs. power output and HR, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Statistical power analysis revealed that a subject cohort of 20 was required to demonstrate a 10% change in cardiorespiratory and metabolic variables between the two OCP preparations. To determine differences between the OCPs and pre- and/or postexercise data, a Student’s paired t test and ANOVA were used where appropriate. To compare the cardiorespiratory and plasma lactate responses during incremental exercise to exhaustion between the OCPs, a two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA, incorporating a Greenhouse-Geisser adjustment for multisample sphericity, was used. The factors tested in the ANOVA were OCP (low P vs. high P), level of exercise intensity (10 time points throughout exercise: rest, 20–100% O2peak or WLpeak) and interaction between OCP and level of exercise intensity for the incremental exercise test and cycle phase and exercise time (5-min intervals during the high-intensity test) for the steady-state submaximal test. When the two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction effect between OCP and level of exercise intensity, planned comparisons were performed between OCPs using Tukey’s honestly significant difference post hoc analyses incorporating Bonferroni’s correction to allow for multiple comparisons. Unless otherwise stated, data are reported as mean ± SEM, and the level of significance for all statistical tests was set at P ≤ 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OCP effectiveness

The OCP suppressed 17ß-estradiol and progesterone in each individual, and the concentrations were not different between the two OCP preparations (17ß-estradiol: low P, 21.9 ± 1.0, high P, 31.5 ± 6.2 pg·ml–1; progesterone: low P, 1.3 ± 0.1, high P, 1.2 ± 0.1 nmol·liter–1; SI units: 17ß-estradiol: low P, 80.3 ± 3.8, high P, 115.6 ± 22.8 pmol·liter–1; progesterone: low P, 1.3 ± 0.1, high P, 1.2 ± 0.1 nmol·liter–1).

Preexercise diet

There was no difference in the 48-h self-reported preexercise dietary intakes between low P and high P in terms of total caloric intake (low P, 5682 ± 109, high P, 5712 ± 127 kJ) or relative contributions of carbohydrate (low P, 56 ± 3, high P, 56 ± 2%), fat (low P, 23 ± 1, high P, 22 ± 4%), and protein (low P, 21 ± 4, high P, 22 ± 5%).

Subjects

Physical characteristics. The level of synthetic progestin had no effect on body weight (low P: 70.6 ± 3.5, high P: 70.6 ± 3.4 kg) or body mass index (low P: 24.3 ± 1.0, high P: 24.3 ± 1.0 kg·m2).

Incremental exercise to exhaustion: work parameters

Work. There was a trend (P < 0.07) toward an improvement in peak power output (WLpeak, low P: 202 ± 5.2, high P: 205 ± 4.4 W), time to exhaustion (low P: 17.8 ± 0.4, high P: 18.2 ± 0.4 min), and total work done (low P: 111.7 ± 5.4, high P: 114.7 ± 4.8 kJ) with high P.

Rate of perceived exertion. The rate of perceived exertion increased from rest and was highest at O2peak. There was no difference in perceived exertion at O2peak (low P: 10.0 ± 0.0, high P: 10 ± 0.0) or with increasing exercise intensity between the two OCP preparations.

Cardiorespiratory variables

Oxygen uptake. Whereas there was no difference in O2 at rest with the two OCP preparations (Table 1Go), there was a trend for a higher value with high P as exercise intensity increased (Fig. 1AGo), and at O2peak, there was a 4% difference (P < 0.05). Overall the subject group achieved 130 (low P) and 134% (high P) of their age-based predicted absolute O2max values for sedentary females (22).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Cardiorespiratory variables at rest and O2peak during incremental exercise to exhaustion in sedentary women: effect of low and high progestin

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Effect of low and high progestin on O2 (A), RER (B), oxygen pulse (C), and plasma lactate concentration (D) during incremental exercise to exhaustion in sedentary females (low P, closed circles; high P, open circles). Values are mean ± SEM, n = 23. *, Significantly different from low P, P < 0.05. To convert lactate to SI units (millimoles ·liter–1) multiply by 0.1110.

 
Carbon dioxide output. CO2 at rest (Table 1Go), with increasing exercise intensity during the incremental test and at O2peak, were not different between low P and high P.

Heart rate. There was no effect of low P and high P on either resting or peak HR (HRpeak) (Table 1Go) or the HR responses with increasing exercise intensity. Subjects attained 95 ± 1 and 94 ± 1% of their age-predicted HRmax during the low P and high P treatments, respectively.

RER. There was no difference between the two OCPs at rest or O2peak (Table 1Go). Despite a consistently lower RER with increasing exercise intensity throughout the incremental test with high P, the repeated-measures ANOVA (RMANOVA) found no significant interaction between RER and the OCPs (Fig. 1BGo).

Oxygen pulse. There was no effect of low P and high P on the oxygen pulse at either rest or O2peak (Table 1Go). However, when the relationships of the two OCP preparations and exercise intensity, expressed as %O2peak, were examined throughout exercise, the RMANOVA and post hoc analysis detected a significant interaction effect, such that at exercise intensities equivalent to 90 and 100% O2peak, the oxygen pulse was increased by 11% with high P, compared with low P (Fig. 1CGo).

Ventilation. E at rest and O2peak and the E with increasing exercise intensity were not altered by the level of progestin. Whereas O2 was higher at rest with high P administration (P < 0.05), there was no difference in the resting values of CO2 between low P and high P (Table 1Go). Furthermore, O2 and CO2 either at O2peak or with increasing exercise intensity in the incremental test were not affected by either OCP. Breathing frequency and tidal volume were not different between low P and high P either at rest or O2peak or throughout incremental exercise to exhaustion (Table 1Go).

Ventilatory threshold. The ventilatory threshold, when expressed in absolute terms (E: low P, 404.4 ± 43.8, high P, 403.4 ± 43.7 liters·min–1) or relative to O2peak (%O2peak: low P, 35.1 ± 2.1, high P, 35.8 ± 3.2%), was similar between the two OCP treatments. HR and power output at the threshold were also not different between the two OCP preparations.

Metabolic parameters

Lactate. There was no difference between low P and high P in the resting (low P: 6.3 ± 0.9, high P: 5.4 ± 0.9 mg·dl–1; SI units: low P: 0.7 ± 0.1, high P: 0.6 ± 0.1 mmol·liter–1), end-exercise (low P: 102.7 ± 5.4, high P: 100.9 ± 4.5 mg·dl–1; SI units: low P: 11.4 ± 0.6, high P: 11.2 ± 0.5 mmol·liter–1), or peak postexercise plasma lactate concentrations (low P: 108.1 ± 5.4, high P: 108.1 ± 4.5 mg·dl–1; SI units: low P: 12.0 ± 0.6, high P: 12.0 ± 0.5 mmol·liter–1) or the time to reach peak concentration (low P: 1.4 ± 0.1, high P: 1.7 ± 0.2 min). Furthermore, there was no interaction between plasma lactate concentration and the two OCPs with increasing levels of exercise intensity throughout the incremental test (Fig. 1DGo).

Lactate threshold (LT). When expressed in terms of O2 (liters·min–1 or %O2peak), the LT was not different between low P and high P nor were any differences in the HR, plasma lactate concentration, and power output at the LT between the two OCP preparations (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Physiological responses at the lactate threshold: effect of low and high progestin

 
Substrate metabolism. Low P or high P did not influence the energy derived from carbohydrate or lipids at rest (carbohydrate, low P: 0.2 ± 0.1, high P, 0.2 ± 0.1; lipid, low P: 1.4 ± 0.1, high P: 1.5 ± 0.2 kcal·min–1) or at O2peak (carbohydrate, low P: 14.4 ± 0.8, high P, 14.1 ± 0.1; lipid, low P: 2.0 ± 0.6, high P: 2.6 ± 1.0 kcal·min–1), and the RMANOVA revealed no interaction between the type of OCP and substrate utilization with increasing exercise intensity.

Steady-state submaximal exercise test

Work load corresponding to 75% O2peak. There were no differences in the absolute work load corresponding to 75% of each subject’s OCP-specific O2peak applied during the submaximal exercise between the OCPs (workload: low P: 140 ± 3, high P: 141 ± 4 W; O2: low P: 2.2 ± 0.1, high P: 2.2 ± 0.1 liter·min–1; HR: low P: 152 ± 4, high P: 157 ± 2 beats·min–1).

Rate of perceived exertion. There was no difference in perceived exertion during the submaximal steady-state exercise test at 75% O2peak between the two OCP treatments (low P: 6.8 ± 0.2, high P: 6.2 ± 0.3).

Cardiorespiratory variables

Rest. O2, CO2, E, HR, RER, oxygen pulse, tidal volume, breathing frequency, and CO2 were similar between low and high P, but ventilation and the O2 were increased with high P (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Cardiorespiratory variables at rest and in response to steady-state submaximal exercise at 75% O2peak in sedentary women, effect of low and high progestin

 
Seventy-five percent O2peak. Whereas the level of synthetic progestin did not affect O2, CO2, HR, E, O2, and CO2, the oxygen pulse was increased (P < 0.05) and the RER decreased (P < 0.05) in response throughout steady-state exercise at 75% O2peak in the high P condition (Table 3Go).

Plasma lactate concentration

Rest. Resting plasma lactate concentrations (low P: 7.2 ± 0.9, high P: 7.2 ± 0.9 mg·dl–1; SI units: low P: 0.8 ± 0.1, high P: 0.8 ± 0.1 mmol·liter–1) were not different between the two OCP treatments.

Seventy-five percent O2peak. During high-intensity steady-state exercise, there was no difference in mean plasma lactate concentrations between low P and high P (low P: 64.0 ± 4.5, high P: 68.5 ± 4.5 mg·dl–1; SI units: low P: 7.1 ± 0.5, high P: 7.6 ± 0.5 mmol·liter–1).

Substrate metabolism

Although there was no difference in carbohydrate (low P: 0.1 ± 0.0, high P: 0.1 ± 0.0 kcal·min–1) or lipid (low P: 1.2 ± 0.1, high P: 1.3 ± 0.1 kcal·min–1) oxidation at rest, there was a significant increase in lipid oxidation with high P, compared with low P, throughout the steady-state exercise test (low P: 6.7 ± 0.2, high P: 7.3 ± 0.2 kcal·min–1, P < 0.05).

Performance test

During the performance test, whereas power output (low P: 175 ± 4, high P: 175 ± 4 W), HR (low P: 190 ± 2, high P: 191 ± 4 beats·min–1), and peak lactate (low P: 91.0 ± 3.6, high P: 88.3 ± 3.6 mg·dl–1; SI units: low P: 10.1 ± 0.4, high P: 9.8 ± 0.4 mmol·liter–1) were not affected by the level of synthetic progestin, exercise time to exhaustion (low P: 33 ± 4, high P: 41 ± 6 sec, P < 0.05) and the total work were increased with high P, and there was a trend toward a higher peak oxygen uptake (low P: 41.0 ± 2.0, high P: 43.5 ± 2.0 liters·min–1, P = 0.06) in this synthetic hormone environment.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results obtained in the present study provide two new perspectives on a probable role for the OCP in modifying exercise status, namely an enhancement in aerobic power and a major role in promoting fat utilization as an energy source during exercise. Given that the blood levels of the endogenous sex steroids, 17ß-estradiol and progesterone, were suppressed and consistent with both OCP treatments, any affect on exercise status is likely to reflect an action of the elevated blood levels of the exogenous, synthetic female sex steroids and any difference between the two oral contraceptives is likely to reflect an effect of the different levels of progestin.

In terms of aerobic power, the most striking finding was that O2peak with both OCPs was 30% or more above the age-predicted O2max values (liters·min–1) for sedentary females (22). Given that the O2peak values were normally distributed, a differential of this magnitude might suggest that the subject cohort was engaged in regular physical activity, with O2peak values similar to the mean values for sedentary males of a similar age, 47.7 ml · kg–1·min–1 (22). Yet the subject selection process clearly identified these subjects as meeting the inclusion criterion of a sedentary lifestyle (19). Although such a selection process might allow the occasional trained individual to slip into the subject cohort or that the isolated individual might, through genetic endowment, have a O2peak above the age-predicted range, the normal distribution of the present subject cohort makes this unlikely. Therefore, it could be argued that this substantial elevation in O2peak is a consequence of oral contraceptive administration (a history of OCP use for at least 6 months was required for study selection), and furthermore, given that the O2peak value (ml·kg–1·min–1) was higher with the high P than the low P preparation, that this is a progestogenic effect. This finding is contrary to any previous research that examined the effects of female sex steroids, both endogenous and exogenous, on aerobic power.

Some studies, but not all (26, 27) have reported no difference in aerobic capacity per se, during both oral contraceptive administration (28, 29, 30, 31) and the normal menstrual cycle (32, 33, 34, 35), but several have reported an increased time to exhaustion with high levels of progestins (9, 10, 11, 12). How the progestins might have such an effect is uncertain, but given that O2peak is determined by maximal values for cardiac output, oxygen content, and oxygen extraction, the results from the present study provide some clues. In terms of cardiac output, peak HRs during the incremental exercise test were not different from age-predicted values or between the two OCPs, and HRs attained during the steady-state and performance tests were similar with the two OCPs. However, oxygen pulse, regarded by many as an index of stroke volume, was higher with the high P OCP, at both 90 and 100% O2peak during the incremental test and throughout steady-state exercise test at 75% O2peak. This suggests that the increased O2peak values found with both OCPs could be due to an affect of the contained progestin on stroke volume. In support of this contention is the reported finding that synthetic sex steroids increase left ventricular mass, increase end-diastolic volume, and reduce end-systolic volume, with consequent increases in ejection fraction, stroke volume, and cardiac output (36). Furthermore, synthetic progestin administration in rats has been reported to increase blood volume and, through a consequent effect on stroke volume, cardiac output (37).

Whereas an increase in hemoglobin concentration (not measured in the present study) and hence oxygen content could also increase aerobic power with OCP administration, previous research does not support a differential in hemoglobin concentration between women on the OCP and those with normal menstrual cycles (38, 39). Furthermore, this mechanism is unlikely to explain the increase in O2peak when subjects were taking the high P OCP. Although an increase in tissue oxygen extraction with OCP administration could contribute to the improved aerobic power, no previous research could be found documenting such a change. If the increases in aerobic power seen with both OCPs is a progestin-mediated effect using one or more of the mechanisms proposed above, it would be a concern that such an effect occurred after one cycle of exposure. However, all subjects had a previous history of more than 6 months exposure to a progestin-containing monophasic OCP. Nevertheless, the significant 4% differential in O2peak between the low P and high P OCP, which we suggest is a progestin effect, did occur within one cycle.

The other interesting finding in the present study was the shift in energy substrate from carbohydrate to lipid with both OCPs. This was present at rest, during which the RER values suggest exclusive use of lipid as a fuel, and even with the peak workloads achieved during the incremental test, RER did not reach unity. This latter result is surprising and suggests at first sight that the subjects did not expend a maximal effort, given that an RER of 1.1 is an accepted criterion (40). Yet at test termination they met other recognized criteria of a maximal effort, with peak HRs within 5% of age-predicted maximal values and postexercise lactates of 12 mmol·liter–1, and, of course, their O2peak values were 30% or more above age-predicted values for sedentary women. This leads inescapably to the conclusion that lipids dominated as the energy substrate throughout these tests. As with the effect of aerobic power discussed above, this also seems to be a progestogenic effect, given that when subjects were taking the high P OCP, there was a trend for lower RER values throughout the incremental test, a differential that was significant at all time points throughout the steady-state test. The other intriguing result regarding energy metabolism was the acceleration in blood lactate accumulation once the exercise intensity exceeded the LT. This presumably reflects either an increase in production or a reduction clearance or both. Given that the RER values suggest that lipids are the principal energy source with all forms of exercise in the present study, an increase in production seems less likely, although, as the RER value indicates, carbohydrate will be accessed increasingly as workloads increase beyond 50% O2peak. A decrease in plasma clearance of lactate is also a possibility, given that reconversion to pyruvate in skeletal muscle would be hindered by an accumulation of pyruvate secondary to the well-known inhibitory action of lipid oxidation on pyruvate dehydrogenase (41). Furthermore, hepatic clearance of lactate via the Cori cycle might also be reduced by the inhibitory actions of both estrogens and progestins on hepatic gluconeogenesis, for which lactate is an important substrate.

Despite the persuasive nature of the present results, previous studies concerned with exercise status and the OCP have reported no change in substrate utilization between different formulations (42) or between the active and nonactive pill days within one OCP cycle (28, 31). One plausible explanation for the conflicting findings with the current study is a difference between the days on which the exercise testing occurred. Lynch and coworkers (28, 31) reported no change in substrate utilization within a monophasic OCP cycle, yet the two sessions of exercise testing were completed within the 21-d time frame of pill ingestion. Because the blood levels of estrogen and progestin reach steady-state after approximately 5 d of monophasic OCP administration (21), the blood levels of the female sex steroids, and therefore effect on substrate choice, were likely to have been the same on both test days.

Those studies, which have found an effect on substrate choice during exercise in women, have attributed this change to fluctuations in circulating levels of estrogen (7, 8). If there is a role for a progestogenic-induced shift to lipid metabolism, as the results seem to indicate, it requires a plausible mechanism. It is known that high levels of progestin during late gestation, OCP administration, and the luteal phase of normal menstrual cycles induce insulin resistance (43) and glucose intolerance (44). A recent series of experiments in mice further demonstrates the relationship between progesterone and glucose homeostasis. Administration progesterone to wild-type and db/db mice accelerates hyperglycemia and the progression of diabetes, whereas administration of RU486, an antagonist of the progesterone receptor, significantly improves glucose intolerance in these animals. Progesterone receptor knockout mice have improved glucose tolerance owing to an increased insulin secretion (45). Progestins also decrease muscle glucose utilization through effects on GLUT4 (46) and hexokinase (47). Taken together these observations indicate that progestins could push substrate oxidation toward fat by reducing the availability of glucose-6-phosphate for glycolysis and increasing the accessibility of lipid substrates. This shift from carbohydrate to lipid as the preferred energy substrate may, through a consequent glycogen-sparing effect, explain in part the affect of the high P OCP preparation on the performance test. Both total work done and time to exhaustion were increased when compared with the low P OCP cycle. Whereas all the evidence presented from this study suggests that these are progestin-mediated effects, given that the dose of estrogen was constant, an interaction between the two hormones cannot be excluded.

This study provides the first evidence that synthetic progestins in OCP formulations can have a significant effect on maximal aerobic power, possibly through an effect on stroke volume, and, furthermore, promote a shift in the principal energy substrate used during exercise from carbohydrate to lipid. The performance effects of this combination on aerobic power and lipid oxidation are potentially of great significance and have been partially exposed in the increased time to exhaustion and total work done when the OCP with the higher progestin concentration was administered, despite the effects on lactate metabolism. It should be noted that norethisterone, the synthetic progestin administered in this study, binds to the progesterone receptor but also has a low affinity for the androgen receptor (48). Norethisterone therefore can exert both progestogenic and androgenic actions. Whereas the findings presented in this paper suggest a progestin-mediated effect, given that estrogen is also present and that estrogen is required for synthesis of the progestin receptor, an interaction between the two synthetic sex steroids cannot be disregarded. It remains to be seen whether the cardiorespiratory, metabolic, and performance-enhancing effects reported in this study are exclusively effects of the progestins or whether they are the combined effect of estrogen, androgen, and progestin.


    Footnotes
 
L.M.R. was supported by The Australian Government, Department of Education, Science, and Training, Australian Postgraduate Research Award.

First Published Online April 19, 2005

Abbreviations: fR, Breathing frequency; HR, heart rate; LT, lactate threshold; MSE, mean squared error; OCP, oral contraceptive pill; r2, coefficient of determination; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; RMANOVA, repeated-measures ANOVA; O2peak, peak oxygen uptake; %O2peak, relative exercise intensity; %WLpeak, percentage of the workload at exhaustion.

Received December 8, 2004.

Accepted April 8, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Redman LM, Scroop GC, Norman RJ 2003 Effect of menstrual cycle phase on the exercise status of young sedentary women. Eur J Appl Physiol 90:505–513[Medline]
  2. Hackney AC, Curley CS, Nicklas BJ 1991 Physiological responses to submaximal exercise at the mid-follicular, ovulatory and mid-luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1:94–98
  3. Hackney AC, McCracken-Compton MA, Ainsworth, B 1994 Substrate responses to submaximal exercise in the midfollicular and midluteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Int J Sport Nutr 4:299–308[Medline]
  4. Campbell SE, Angus DJ, Febbraio MA 2001 Glucose kinetics and exercise performance during phases of the menstrual cycle: effect of glucose ingestion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281:E817–E825
  5. Zderic TW, Coggan AR, Ruby BC 2001 Glucose kinetics and substrate oxidation during exercise in the follicular and luteal phases. J Appl Physiol 90:447–453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hackney AC 1990 Effects of the menstrual cycle on resting muscle glycogen content. Horm Metab Res 22:647[Medline]
  7. Hackney AC 1999 Influence of estrogen on muscle glycogen utilisation during exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 167:273–274[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. D’Eon TM, Sharoff C, Chipkin SR, Grow D, Ruby BC, Braun B 2002 Regulation of exercise carbohydrate metabolism by estrogen and progesterone in women. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 283:E1046–E1055
  9. Jurkowski JE, Jones NL, Walker C, Younglai EV, Sutton JR 1978 Ovarian responses to exercise. J Appl Physiol 44:109–114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Hall-Jurkowski JE, Jones NL, Toews CL, Sutton JR 1981 Effects of the menstrual cycle on blood lactate, O2 delivery, and performance during exercise. J Appl Physiol 51:1493–1499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Schoene RB, Robertson HT, Pierson DJ, Peterson AP 1981 Respiratory drives and exercise in menstrual cycles of athletic and non-athletic women. J Appl Physiol 50:1300–1305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Nicklas BJ, Hackney AC, Sharp RL 1989 The menstrual cycle and exercise: performance, muscle glycogen, and substrate responses. Int J Sports Med 10:264–269[Medline]
  13. Williams TJ, Krahenbuhl GS 1997 Menstrual cycle phase and running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:1609–1618[Medline]
  14. Giacomoni M, Falgairette G 2000 Decreased submaximal oxygen uptake during short duration oral contraceptive use: a randomised cross-over trial in premenopausal women. Ergonomics 43:1559–1570[Medline]
  15. Norman AW, Litwack G 1997 Estrogens and progestins. In: Norman AW, Litwack G, eds. Hormones. London: Academic Press; 361–386
  16. Fotherby K 1996 Bioavailability of orally administered sex steroids used in oral contraception and hormone replacement therapy. Contraception 54:59–69[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Campbell SE, Febbraio MA 2001 Effect of ovarian hormones on mitochondrial enzyme activity in the fat oxidation pathway of skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281:E803–E808
  18. D’Eon TM, Braun B 2002 The roles of estrogen and progesterone in regulating carbohydrate and fat utilization at rest and during exercise. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 11:225–237[Medline]
  19. Shephard, RJ 1992 Semantic and physiological definitions. In: Shephard RJ, Astrand PO, eds. Endurance in sport. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 3–7
  20. Loose-Mitchell DS, Stancel GM 2001 Estrogens and progestins. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, eds. Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1597–1634
  21. Kuhl H 1990 Pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptive steroids and drug interaction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:2113
  22. Bruce RA, Kusumi F, Hosmer D 1973 Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J 85:546–562[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Gore CJ, Catcheside PG, French SN, Bennett JM, Laforgia J 1997 Automated VO2max calibrator for open-circuit indirect calorimetry systems. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:1095–1103[Medline]
  24. Hughson RL, Weisiger KH, Swanson GD 1987 Blood lactate concentration increases as a continuous function in progressive exercise. J Appl Physiol 62:1975–1981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ 1985 Improved detection of lactate threshold during exercise using a log-log transformation. J Appl Physiol 59:1936–1940[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Lebrun CM, McKenzie DC, Prior JC, Taunton JE 1995 Effects of the menstrual cycle on athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:437–444[Medline]
  27. Casazza GA, Suh SH, Miller BF, Navazio FM, Brooks GA 2002 Effects of oral contraceptives on peak exercise capacity. J Appl Physiol 93:1698–1702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lynch NJ, Galloway SDR, Nimmo MA 2000 Effects of moderate dietary manipulation on intermittent exercise performance and metabolism in women. Eur J Appl Physiol 81:197–202[Medline]
  29. Grucza R, Pekkarinen H, Titov EK, Kononoff A, Hanninen O 1993 Influence of the menstrual cycle and oral contraceptives on thermoregulatory responses to exercise in young women. Eur J Appl Physiol 67:279–285[CrossRef]
  30. Bryner RW, Toffle RC, Ullrich IH, Yeater RA 1996 Effect of low dose oral contraceptives on exercise performance. Br J Sports Med 30:36–40[Abstract]
  31. Lynch NJ, Nimmo MA 1998 Effects of menstrual cycle phase and oral contraceptive use on intermittent exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 78:565–572[CrossRef]
  32. Bemben DA, Salm PC, Salm AJ 1995 Ventilatory and blood lactate responses to maximal treadmill exercise during the menstrual cycle. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 35:257–262[Medline]
  33. Dombovy ML, Bonekat HW, Williams TJ, Staats BA 1987 Exercise performance and ventilatory response in the menstrual cycle. Med Sci Sports Exerc 19:111–117[Medline]
  34. De Souza MJ, Maresh CM, Maguire MS, Kraemer WJ, Flora-Ginter G, Goetz KL 1989 Menstrual status and plasma vasopressin, renin activity, and aldosterone exercise responses. J Appl Physiol 67:736–743[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. De Souza MJ, Maguire MS, Rubin KR, Maresh CM 1990 Effects of menstrual phase and amenorrhea on exercise performance in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 22:575–580[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Sites CK, Tischler MD, Blackman JA, Higgel J, Fairbank JT, O’Connell M, Ashikaga T 1999 Effect of short-term hormone replacement therapy on left ventricular mass and contractile function. Fertil Steril 71:137–143[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Kuebler JF, Jarrar D, Bland KI, Rue L, Wang P, Chaudry IH 2003 Progesterone administration after trauma and hemorrhagic shock improves cardiovascular responses. Crit Care Med 31:1786–1793[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Tengalia SA, McLellan TM, Klentrou PP 1999 Influence of the menstrual cycle and oral contraceptives on tolerance to uncompensable heat stress. Eur J Appl Physiol 80:76–83[CrossRef]
  39. Lebrun CM 1993 Effect of different phases of the menstrual cycle and oral contraceptives on athletic performance. Sports Med 16:400–430[Medline]
  40. Howley ET, Bassett DR, Welch HG 1995 Criteria for maximal oxygen uptake: review and commentary. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:1292–1301[Medline]
  41. Newsholme EA 1993 Application of knowledge of metabolic integration to the problem of metabolic limitations in sprints, middle distance and marathon running, In: Poortmans JR, ed. Principles of exercise biochemistry. Basel, Switzerland: Medicine and Sport Science; 230–247
  42. Bonen A, Haynes FW, Graham TE 1991 Substrate and hormonal responses to exercise in women using oral contraceptives. J Appl Physiol 70:1917–1927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Sutter-Dub MT, Dazey B 1981 Progesterone antagonizes insulin effect: in vivo and in vitro studies. Horm Metab Res 13:241–242[Medline]
  44. Kalkhoff RK, Jacobson M, Lemper D 1970 Progesterone, pregnancy and the augmented plasma insulin response. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 31:24–28[Medline]
  45. Picard F, Wanatabe M, Schoonjans K, Lydon J, O’Malley BW, Auwerx J 2002 Progesterone receptor knockout mice have an improved glucose homeostasis secondary to ß-cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:15644–15648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Campbell SE, Febbraio MA 2002 Effect of the ovarian hormones on GLUT4 expression and contraction-stimulated glucose uptake. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 282:E1139–E1146
  47. Sutter-Dub MT, Vergnaud MT 1982 Progesterone and glucose metabolism in the female rat adipocyte: effect on hexokinase activity. J Endocrinol 95:369–375[Abstract]
  48. Sitruk-Ware R 2004 Pharmacological profile of progestins. Maturitas 47:277–283[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/7/3830    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Redman, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Redman, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
Right arrow Metabolism
Right arrow Obesity


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res.