help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2004-1900
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/5/2904    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akoum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Morin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akoum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Morin, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 5 2904-2910
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

Marked Increase in Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Synthesis and Secretion in Human Endometrial Cells in Response to Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Hormone

Ali Akoum, Christine N. Metz and Mathieu Morin

Unité d’Endocrinologie de la Reproduction (A.A., M.M.), Centre de Recherche, Hôpital Saint-François d’Assise, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada G1L 3L5; and North Shore Long Island Jewish Research Institute (C.N.M.), Manhasset, New York 11030

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Ali Akoum, Ph.D., Laboratoire d’Endocrinologie de la Reproduction, Centre de Recherche, Hôpital Saint-François d’Assise, 10 rue de l’Espinay, Local D0-711, Québec, Québec, Canada G1L 3L5. E-mail: ali.akoum{at}crsfa.ulaval.ca.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Originally identified for its capacity to inhibit the random migration of macrophages in vitro, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is now recognized as a multifunctional cytokine that modulates the immune response and acts as a growth and angiogenic factor. Recent studies showed that MIF is expressed in the human endometrium across the menstrual cycle as well as in chorionic villi from first-trimester human placenta, which suggests an involvement of MIF in reproduction. Herein, we report that human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a glycoprotein hormone that plays a critical role in the initiation and maintenance of pregnancy, markedly stimulates MIF expression in endometrial stromal cells. Cell treatment with hCG resulted in a dose-dependent increase in MIF protein secretion and mRNA steady-state levels, as shown by immunocytochemistry, ELISA, and RT-PCR. Assessment of MIF mRNA half-life showed that hCG treatment had no significant effect on MIF mRNA stability (P = 0.08). However, nuclear transcription assays (run-on) revealed that hCG acts predominantly by up-regulating MIF gene transcription. These data clearly indicate that MIF can mediate hCG effects on the human endometrium and, in view of the immunomodulatory and angiogenic properties of MIF, reveal a new mechanism by which hCG sustains human pregnancy and promotes embryonic growth.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
HUMAN CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN (hCG), a placental glycoprotein hormone mainly produced by the syncytiotrophoblasts in the chorionic villi, is one of the major and earliest embryonic signals. In a normal pregnancy, hCG is detectable in maternal serum as early as 1 d after the initiation of embryo implantation, then rapidly rises to a peak value around 60–90 d gestation, and gradually decreases within the second trimester (1). The main role of hCG is considered to stimulate the corpus luteum in the ovary to produce progesterone and maintain embryo implantation (2). Newest evidence, however, showed a wide spectrum of cell targets and biological properties, by which hCG plays a crucial role in the implantation and growth of human embryo. Interestingly, it has been shown that the human endometrium, the natural host site where the embryo implants and develops, contains functional membrane-bound hCG/LH in glandular and luminal epithelial cells as well as in stromal cells (3, 4). Additional studies demonstrated that hCG promotes the decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells (5). It is now well documented that hCG directly modulates numerous endometrial functions, thereby promoting endometrial receptivity as well as the implantation and growth of human embryo (6).

Implantation of human embryo involves a complex process of tissue remodeling. Deep morphological, structural, and functional changes occurring within the uterus, particularly in the endometrium, are orchestrated primarily by embryonic factors/signals that facilitate and enable embryonic invasion and growth (7). Angiogenesis represents a key feature of such a tissue remodelling. hCG has been shown to possess intrinsic angiogenic properties (8) and to promote the production of angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor, by the placenta (9) as well as by decidual macrophages (8). However, it is still unknown whether hCG can stimulate endometrial cells to produce angiogenic factors. Cumulative evidence also indicates a critical role for immune cells in tissue remodeling occurring within the endometrial tissue during embryo implantation and growth. During normal pregnancy, the decidua is populated by a variety of leukocytes and macrophages that constitute 20–30% of the decidual cells at the site of implantation (10). Macrophages are believed to protect the embryo against infection and to play an important role in maternal tolerance and maintenance of pregnancy (10).

Originally described as a product of activated T lymphocytes that inhibits the random migration of cultured macrophages, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is now known for being involved in a variety of biological processes, including inflammatory and immune responses, cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and tumor progression (for reviews, see Refs.11, 12, 13). Recent studies showed MIF expression in the human endometrium as well as in trophoblasts in the first trimester of pregnancy, which suggests a role for this factor during implantation and early embryonic development (14, 15).

The present study showed that hCG induces MIF synthesis and secretion by endometrial stromal cells. Our findings revealed that hCG had no significant effect on MIF mRNA stability and mainly acts by increasing MIF gene transcription. In view of the proangiogenic properties and immunomodulatory effects of MIF, particularly those of activation and inhibition of macrophage migration and immunosuppression of natural killer (NK) cell activity, it is quite plausible that MIF represents an important effector cell mediator of hCG-induced endometrial changes during embryo implantation, growth, and development.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects and tissue handling

Tissue specimens were obtained from normal fertile women with regular menstrual cycle who underwent laparoscopy for tubal ligation and had not received hormonal or antiinflammatory therapy for at least 3 months before surgery (mean age ± SD, 33.60 ± 6.20 yr; n = 19). Seven women were in the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle, and 12 women were in the secretory phase. The cycle phase was determined according to the histological criteria of Noyes et al. (16). A written informed consent was obtained from these women under a study protocol approved by the Ethical Committee on Human Research at Laval University, Quebec, Canada. Endometrial biopsies were obtained by aspiration with the use of a Pipelle (Unimar Inc., Prodimed, Neuilly-En-Tchelle, France). They were immediately placed in sterile Hanks’ balanced salt solution containing 1% antibiotics-antimycotics at 4 C (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) and transported to the laboratory.

Cell culture and treatment

Endometrial stromal cells were obtained and characterized according to our previously described procedure (17). Stromal cells were plated and subcultured in DMEM-F12 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics (Invitrogen) to eliminate contamination by macrophages or other leukocytes. All experiments were initiated after 24-h incubation in FBS-free medium. Extensive characterization of cell cultures prepared using this protocol previously confirmed more than 95% purity, with cells retaining cytoskeletal markers of their endometrial stromal origin (17). At confluence, the complete medium was discarded and replaced overnight with FBS-free medium, and cells were cultured for additional periods of time (0–24 h) with fresh FBS-free medium containing different concentrations of hCG (0–1 µg/ml) (recombinant expressed in mouse cell line, 10,000 IU/mg; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). In some experiments, cycloheximide and actinomycin D (Sigma) were added to the cell culture at the same time as hCG, at a final concentration 100 and 10 µg/ml (355 and 8 µM), respectively. hCG-induced MIF protein expression/secretion was evaluated by immunocytofluorescence and by ELISA in the culture medium, whereas MIF mRNA was evaluated by RT-PCR and nuclear transcription (run-on).

Immunocytofluorescence

Stromal cells were plated onto Lab-Tek 8-chamber slides (Nalge Nunc International, Naperville, IL), treated for 24 h in the absence or presence of 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG, and fixed for 15 min at room temperature in 95% cold ethanol. Cultures were then rinsed three times in PBS/0.1% Tween 20 (PBS-Tween); incubated for 90 min at room temperature with polyclonal anti-MIF goat antibody (0.66 µg/ml of PBS-Tween; primary antibody) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN); rinsed three times with PBS-Tween; incubated for 1 h at room temperature with 1:50 dilution in PBS-Tween of fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated donkey antigoat Igs (second antibody) (ICN Biomedicals, St. Laurent, Quebec, Canada); rinsed three times with PBS-Tween; covered with mounting medium (Mowiol containing 10% paraphenylenediamine, an antifading agent; Sigma); and sealed. The specificity of the immunostaining was confirmed by immunoabsorption of the primary anti-MIF antibody with 2 µg/ml (0.16 µM) recombinant human (rh) MIF (R&D Systems) before incubation with cells. Cells incubated without the primary antibody or with goat Igs (Sigma) at the same concentration as the primary antibody were included as negative controls in all experiments. Slides were observed under a microscope equipped for fluorescence (Leica Mikroskopie und Systeme GmbH, Model DMRB; Postfach, Wetzlar, Germany) and photographed.

ELISA

MIF ELISA was performed using a mouse monoclonal antihuman-MIF antibody (R&D Systems) as a capture antibody, a rabbit polyclonal antihuman-MIF antibody for detection, an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat antirabbit antibody, and paranitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma) as substrate (18). The OD was measured at 405 nm, and MIF concentrations were extrapolated from a standard curve using rhMIF. The sensitivity limit of the assay was 300 pg/ml (24 pM), with intra- and interassay coefficients of variation less than 4%.

RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from stromal cell cultures using the TRIzol reagent kit (Invitrogen). The conditions for preparing the internal standards, the RT-PCR, the primers used for semiquantitative RT-PCR, and Southern blotting have been described previously (19). Briefly, specific oligonucleotide primers were designed to amplify sequences from human MIF mRNA (255 bp) and human glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (240 bp) as internal control, and reaction products were separated on 1.8% agarose gels. Southern blot hybridization was performed using 32P-labeled MIF and GAPDH cDNAs [American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA]. The intensity of the hybridization signals was determined by computer-assisted densitometry, using Quantity One Quantitation Software (Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). The quantity of the PCR products was determined by densitometric analysis of the intensity of the hybridization signal, the relative level of MIF mRNA normalized to GAPDH mRNA was calculated, and the results were expressed as percentage of control (MIF mRNA level in cells cultured without any stimulus).

mRNA stability and half-life experiments

Cells were incubated with the culture medium alone (control) or containing 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG for 24 h, as described earlier. Transcription was then stopped with 10 µg/ml (8 µM) actinomycin D, and cells were harvested after different times (0–8 h) of incubation with actinomycin D for RNA extraction and RT-PCR analysis. The relative level of MIF mRNA normalized to GAPDH mRNA was calculated at each time point, and the time required for 50% diminution of MIF mRNA level was determined by linear regression using GraphPad Software, Prism 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Nuclear run-on assay

Cell culture and treatment with hCG were performed as mentioned above. Isolation of nuclei, nuclear transcription, and extraction of radiolabeled RNA were performed as described previously (20). The radioactive RNA was used to probe 5 µg alkali denatured plasmid MIF and 28S DNAs (ATCC) immobilized on nylon membranes, using a slot blot apparatus (Hoefer, San Francisco, CA). Empty plasmid vector was used as negative control. Hybridization was carried out for 3 d at 42 C using 5–10 million cpm/ml of hybridization buffer. Membranes were washed four times with 2x sodium saline citrate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate at 65 C for 30 min; incubated with 10 µg/ml RNase A and 100 µg/ml proteinase K for 30 min at 37 C, respectively; washed twice again with 2x sodium saline citrate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate at 65 C for 30 min; and finally exposed to x-ray films (BioMax, Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) at –80 C.

Statistical analysis

Data followed a parametric distribution and were therefore expressed as mean ± SEM. An unpaired t test was used for comparing the means of two groups, and one-way ANOVA followed by the Dunnett test was used for multiple comparisons. Differences were considered as statistically significant whenever a P value less than 0.05 occurred. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Software.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Endometrial stromal cells were first examined for MIF protein expression by immunocytofluorescence. Confluent monolayers of endometrial stromal cells incubated with anti-MIF antibody showed faint staining under conditions in which the culture medium contained no stimulus (Fig. 1AGo). After culturing the cells in the presence of 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG for 24 h (Fig. 1CGo), an increase in staining intensity was noted to be mainly localized in perinuclear cytoplasm. Staining was virtually absent in cells incubated with goat IgGs instead of anti-MIF antibody or with anti-MIF antibody preabsorbed with an excess 2 µg/ml (0.16 µM) rhMIF (Fig. 1Go, B and D). These data are representative of three stromal cell cultures; one from proliferative phase endometrial tissue and two from secretory phase tissues.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Immunocytochemical analysis of hCG-induced MIF expression in endometrial cells. Cells cultured in chamber slides were incubated for 24 h with the culture medium alone or supplemented with 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG, and MIF was detected by immunocytofluorescence using a MIF-specific polyclonal goat antibody. Note the faint staining in cells incubated in the culture medium without stimulus (A) and the marked increase in the intensity of staining in the presence of hCG (C). Staining was virtually absent in the presence of goat Igs used instead of the primary antibody (B) or anti-MIF antibody preabsorbed with an excess of rhMIF (D). Scale bar, 30 µM.

 
These findings prompted us to quantitatively assess MIF secretion by endometrial cells in response to hCG treatment. Thus, endometrial cell cultures were exposed to varying concentrations of hCG for different time periods. Our data showed a spontaneous secretion of MIF in the culture medium devoid of any stimulus (control) and that hCG significantly stimulates MIF secretion over control and in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Cell stimulation with 0.1 and 1 µg/ml (2.6 and 26 nM) hCG for 24 h resulted in 190.30 ± 20.53% and 240.20 ± 34.45% increase over control (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively) (data from nine different patients; four in the proliferative phase and five in the secretory phase) (Fig. 2AGo). The hCG-induced MIF secretion gradually increased throughout the incubation period, reaching statistical significance after 24 h of exposure to 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG (193.40 ± 17.29% increase over control; P < 0.01) (data from four different patients; three in the proliferative phase and one in the secretory phase) (Fig. 2BGo). Analysis of cell responsiveness according to the menstrual cycle phase showed that endometrial cells from the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle were significantly more responsive to 1 µg/ml (26 nM) hCG compared with cells from the proliferative phase (297.60 ± 54.75% vs. 168.60 ± 18.61% increase in MIF secretion over control, respectively; P < 0.05).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Effect of hCG on MIF secretion by endometrial stromal cells. Cells grown to confluence were incubated for 24 h with 0–1 µg/ml (0–26 nM) hCG (A) or with 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG for different time periods (0–24 h) (B). MIF secretion in the culture supernatant was evaluated by ELISA and expressed as percentage of control (the ratio of MIF protein concentration in the presence of hCG to that found in the culture medium devoid of any stimulus for an equivalent incubation time). Data are means ± SEM from nine (A) and four (B) endometrial cell cultures, each of which was from a different patient. {dagger}, Cells coincubated with 100 µg/ml (355 µM) cycloheximide and 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG. **, P < 0.01; and ***, P < 0.001 compared with control.

 
In some experiments, endometrial cells were incubated with 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG together with 100 µg/ml (355 µM) cycloheximide, an inhibitor of protein synthesis. Data illustrated in Fig. 2AGo showed that cycloheximide completely blocked hCG-induced MIF secretion (Fig. 2AGo), suggesting that MIF secretion in response to hCG did not result from preformed and stored MIF but rather from de novo MIF synthesis.

We then assessed MIF mRNA synthesis by endometrial cells after treatment with hCG and again found a dose- and time-dependent increase in MIF mRNA as shown in RT-PCR autoradiograms (data from one patient in the secretory phase) (Figs. 3AGo and 4AGo). Data from four patients (three in the proliferative phase and one in the secretory phase) showed 218.80 ± 26.33%, 284.60 ± 44.10%, and 306.70 ± 83.11% increase in MIF mRNA levels over control after cell exposure to 0.01, 0.1, and 1 µg/ml (0.26, 2.6, and 26 nM) hCG (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.05, respectively) for 24-h period (Fig. 3BGo). Cell stimulation with 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG for 12 and 24 h of culture resulted in 183.50 ± 20.76% and 284.60 ± 44.10% increase over control, respectively (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01) (Fig. 4BGo). Moreover, adding 100 µg/ml (355 µM) cycloheximide together with 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG to endometrial cell cultures had no noticeable effect on MIF mRNA levels compared with cultures incubated with 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG alone (Fig. 3Go), suggesting that hCG-induced MIF mRNA synthesis does not require de novo protein synthesis.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Dose-response of hCG-induced MIF mRNA synthesis by endometrial stromal cells. A, Confluent cultures were treated with 0–1 µg/ml (0–26 nM) hCG or control medium for 24 h. Cells were recovered to extract total cellular RNA and to evaluate MIF mRNA expression by RT-PCR. GAPDH was used as internal control. B, MIF mRNA levels were normalized to those of corresponding GAPDH mRNA levels and expressed as percentage of control (the ratio of MIF mRNA levels in the presence of hCG to that found in the presence of the culture medium alone). Data are means ± SEM from four endometrial cell cultures, each of which was from a different patient. {dagger}, Cells coincubated with 100 µg/ml (355 µM) cycloheximide and 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG. *, P < 0.05; and **, P < 0.01 compared with control.

 


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Time-course of hCG-induced MIF mRNA synthesis by endometrial stromal cells. A, Confluent cultures were treated with hCG (0.1 µg/ml) or control medium for different time periods (0–24 h). Cells were recovered at each time point to extract total cellular RNA and to evaluate MIF mRNA expression by RT-PCR. GAPDH was used as internal control. B, MIF mRNA levels were normalized to those of GAPDH and were expressed as percentage of control (the ratio of MIF mRNA levels in the presence of hCG to that found in the presence of the culture medium alone for an equivalent incubation time). Data are means ± SEM from four endometrial cell cultures, each of which was from a different patient. *, P < 0.05, and **, P < 0.01 compared with control.

 
To determine whether the effect of hCG was exerted at the posttranscriptional level and/or the transcriptional level, we evaluated MIF mRNA half-life and gene transcription. Cells were treated or not with 0.1 µg/ml hCG (2.6 nM) for 24 h, as previously described. Figure 5Go shows that pretreatment with hCG had no significant effect on MIF mRNA stability (P = 0.08). Without pretreatment with hCG, the half-life of MIF mRNA was approximately 6.56 ± 0.20 h, whereas in hCG-treated cells, it was 7.53 ± 0.38 h (data from three separate cultures; one from proliferative phase endometrial tissue and two from secretory phase tissues). Furthermore, it would appear that there are two phases in the degradation of mRNA, and after 4 h, there appears to be little if any decrease in mRNA. Nuclear run-on analysis showed that hCG treatment markedly increased MIF nuclear transcription (Fig. 6Go). The mean increase ± SEM in MIF gene transcription over control as determined by densitometric analysis was 220.70 ± 27.72% (data from three separate cultures from secretory phase endometrial tissues).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Effect of hCG on MIF mRNA stability. Cells were treated with 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG for 24 h. De novo RNA synthesis was stopped by adding 10 µg/ml (8 µM) actinomycin D, and cells were harvested after 0, 2, 4, and 8 h of incubation for RNA extraction and RT-PCR analysis. A, An autoradiogram showing a representative experiment. B, Kinetics of MIF mRNA degradation. MIF mRNA steady-state levels were normalized to those of corresponding GAPDH mRNA levels, as quantified by densitometric analysis of MIF and GAPDH hybridization signals. Data from three different cultures were at each time point expressed as the percentage ± SEM of MIF mRNA levels in endometrial stromal cells at time 0.

 


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Nuclear run-on analysis of MIF gene expression by endometrial stromal cells after treatment for 24 h with 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG. DNA samples immobilized onto nylon membranes are as follows: 28S cDNA, MIF cDNA, and pBluescript plasmid DNA (pDNA). Radioactive transcripts were from cells incubated with the culture medium alone (control) or with 0.1 µg/ml (2.6 nM) hCG.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Molecular interactions at the embryo-maternal interface during the time of adhesion and subsequent invasion are crucial to the process of embryonic implantation. Available data indicate that the embryo participates intensively in this early embryo-maternal signaling. hCG represents one of the major and earliest embryonic signals and seems to influence endometrial activity not only through its luteotrophic activity, but also via a direct action on the endometrium (6, 7).

In the present study, we showed that hCG directly acts on endometrial stromal cells to stimulate MIF synthesis and secretion. Cell treatment with physiological concentrations of hCG (21) resulted in a marked increase in MIF protein secretion and mRNA synthesis. Furthermore, cell exposure to cycloheximide, a potent inhibitor of protein synthesis, completely blocked hCG-induced MIF secretion. This suggests that MIF protein secretion in response to hCG does not result from the release of preformed and stored MIF protein in endometrial cells, as previously described in other cell types (22), but rather from hCG-induced de novo MIF synthesis. On the other hand, cycloheximide had no noticeable effect on the levels of MIF mRNA steady-state levels found in endometrial cells coexposed to hCG, suggesting that hCG-mediated induction of MIF mRNA synthesis does not require de novo protein synthesis by endometrial cells.

To further investigate the mechanisms underlying hCG-mediated increase in MIF expression by endometrial cells, we assessed the effects of hCG on MIF mRNA stability. Cytokines are generally known for having a short half-life, and one of the mechanisms that underlie their sustained and prolonged action is that related to their prolonged mRNA stability under specific physiological and pathological conditions (23, 24). Our study did not detect a statistically significant change in MIF mRNA stability in response to hCG. However, nuclear transcription run-on assays revealed a marked increase in MIF mRNA nuclear transcripts in endometrial cells in response to hCG, which clearly indicates a transcriptional regulation of MIF expression by hCG in endometrial stromal cells. Therefore, our data indicate that hCG up-regulation of MIF mRNA synthesis by endometrial stromal cells is exerted more predominantly at the transcriptional than at the posttranscriptional level. At the present time, it is still unknown how hCG can up-regulate MIF gene transcription. Recent data from our laboratory indicate that the transcription factor nuclear factor-{kappa}B (NF-{kappa}B) is a major factor involved in MIF gene transcription in endometrial cells (our unpublished data). Furthermore, NF-{kappa}B appeared to be activated and translocated in some cell types as a result of hCG stimulation (25), but it remains unknown whether hCG had any effect on NF-{kappa}B in endometrial cells.

In the present study, we further showed that endometrial cells from the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle were significantly more responsive than cells from the proliferative phase to high but physiological hCG concentration. This is in keeping with the finding of higher levels of hCG receptors in the endometrium in the second phase of the cycle and the fact that progesterone, the secretion of which is maintained by hCG during the first trimester of pregnancy (2), up-regulates hCG receptors in the endometrium (3), therefore making this tissue more responsive to elevated hCG concentrations. Taken together, these findings further support a role for hCG-mediated MIF secretion in uterine adaptation during implantation and placentation.

These findings may have a considerable physiological significance, considering the biological properties of MIF and the critical role of hCG in human pregnancy.

First, they clearly demonstrate that MIF can be produced locally in the endometrial tissue in response to the major embryonic signal hCG. There is little information on the role of MIF in early pregnancy, and the present results suggest that the human embryo has the capacity for local modulation of the production of cytokines that, in turn, may sustain development and maintain pregnancy. Data available to date point toward a role for MIF in reproduction. This factor has been found in human ovary (26), human endometrium, and chorionic villi from first-trimester human placenta (14, 15) and has been shown to be up-regulated in bovine epithelial cells in response to interferon-{tau}, a bovine embryonic signal (27). In human pregnancy, the major binding protein of the interferon antagonist sarcolectin, the properties of which correspond to those of MIF, has been described in term placenta (28). However, there is no previous report on the mechanisms underlying MIF expression and involvement in embryonic implantation and growth. The fact that hCG directly up-regulates MIF by human endometrial stromal cells provides evidence that MIF expression may, at least in part, be under embryonic control.

MIF is a multifunctional cytokine with a variety of biological properties that can be relevant for embryo implantation and development. In fact, one of the first identified properties of MIF is that of activating and inhibiting macrophage migration (11, 12, 22). Macrophages represent one of the predominant immune cell types in tissues around the embryo (10). The mechanisms and relevance of increased macrophage number at the embryo implantation site are still not clearly elucidated. It is believed, however, that these cells may provide protection for the embryo against infections and contribute to its expansion and growth via the secretion of growth, angiogenic, and tissue-remodeling factors (10, 29, 30). hCG-mediated MIF secretion may therefore represent a possible mechanism for macrophage accumulation at the embryo implantation site and suggests a role for the embryo in its own protection and a direct control of the local environment to create conditions that favor embryo survival and growth.

Both in vitro and in vivo data support an important role for MIF in angiogenesis and tumor growth development (11, 12, 31, 32, 33). Angiogenesis, or the development of new vessels, is critical for embryo growth. Due to a high demand for increased blood supply during pregnancy, the vasculature of the maternal tissue surrounding the embryo undergoes deep changes that involve vasodilation and increased permeability but also the development of new vessels (8) and a huge tissue remodeling comparable to some extent to tumor invasion (34, 35). Furthermore, this appears to be related to specific factors of trophoblast origin (36). Interestingly, recent data indicate a role for hCG in human endothelial cell migration and capillary formation via a direct effect (21), and the capability to stimulate the secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), such as MMP-9, by placental and endometrial cells (7, 37). This is of particular interest in view of our present data because it suggests that hCG may promote angiogenesis and embryo implantation through direct and indirect pathways. MIF is known for inducing MMP secretion (38) and for having potent angiogenic properties, which may, at least, be due to a direct mitogenic effect on endothelial cells (31, 32, 33) and to its capability of retaining macrophages, which are known for releasing numerous growth and angiogenic factors (10, 11, 12, 29, 30).

One of the intriguing and fascinating aspects of pregnancy is the capability of such a semiallograft, the embryo, to develop and to extract itself from rejection, the influence of the maternal immune system. Several lines of evidence show the ability of the embryo to modulate the maternal immune system so as to prevent rejection (10, 39, 40). During early pregnancy, the number of uterine leukocytes increases, and NK cells represent one of the main leukocyte types that are increased in the decidua (41), where they achieve peak numbers during the first trimester (42). NK cells play a key role in immune rejection, and, interestingly, it has been shown that NK cells from the embryo implantation site or the maternal serum are immunosuppressed and have lower cytotoxicity for fetal cells (39, 41, 43, 44). Our data showing an hCG-induced MIF secretion by endometrial cells provide another example of the capability of the embryo to modulate the maternal immune system and to contribute to the development of maternal immunotolerance, because MIF is known for suppressing NK cell activity (45).

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that hCG directly up-regulates the synthesis and secretion of a multifunctional cytokine with potent immunomodulatory and angiogenic properties. hCG did not significantly prolong MIF mRNA stability but appeared to act predominantly at the transcriptional level. These findings may have an interesting significance in view of the biological properties of MIF, its expression by deciduas of first-trimester placenta, and the paramount role of hCG in the initiation and maintenance of pregnancy, and point toward a role for MIF in the early events of embryo implantation and growth. Furthermore, they provide a new insight in the mechanisms of hCG action and reveal another feature of the endocrine/immune control of pregnancy and embryonic development.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Drs. François Belhumeur, Jean Blanchet, Marc Bureau, Simon Carrier, Elphège Cyr, Marlène Daris, Jean-Louis Dubé, Jean-Yves Fontaine, Céline Huot, Pierre Huot, Johanne Hurtubise, Rodolphe Maheux, Jacques Mailloux, and Marc Villeneuve for patient evaluation and providing endometrial biopsies; and Christian Bellehumeur, Madeleine Desaulniers, Monique Longpré, Johanne Pelletier, Sylvie Pleau, and Marie-Josée Therriault for technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research Grant MOP-37921 (to A.A.). A.A. is Chercheur National from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec.

First Published Online February 1, 2005

Abbreviations: FBS, Fetal bovine serum; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase(s); NF{kappa}B, nuclear factor {kappa}B; NK, natural killer; PBS-Tween, PBS/0.1% Tween 20; rh, recombinant human.

Received September 27, 2004.

Accepted January 20, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jaffe RB, Lee PA, Midgley Jr AR 1969 Serum gonadotropins before, at the inception of, and following human pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 29:1281–1283[Medline]
  2. Jaffe RB 1983 Fetoplacental endocrine and metabolic physiology. Clin Perinatol 10:669–693[Medline]
  3. Reshef E, Lei ZM, Rao CV, Pridham DD, Chegini N, Luborsky JL 1990 The presence of gonadotropin receptors in nonpregnant human uterus, human placenta, fetal membranes, and decidua. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:421–430[Abstract]
  4. Bernardini L, Moretti-Rojas I, Brush M, Rojas FJ, Balmaceda JP 1995 Status of hCG/LH receptor and G proteins in human endometrium during artificial cycles of hormone replacement therapy. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2:630–635[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Tang B, Gurpide E 1993 Direct effect of gonadotropins on decidualization of human endometrial stroma cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 47:115–121[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Rao CV 2002 [LH receptors: follicle and endometrium]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 31:1S7–1S11
  7. Licht P, Russu V, Wildt L 2001 On the role of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the embryo-endometrial microenvironment: implications for differentiation and implantation. Semin Reprod Med 19:37–47[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Zygmunt M, Herr F, Munstedt K, Lang U, Liang OD 2003 Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 110(Suppl 1):S10–S18
  9. Islami D, Bischof P, Chardonnens D 2003 Modulation of placental vascular endothelial growth factor by leptin and hCG. Mol Hum Reprod 9:395–398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Mor G, Abrahams VM 2003 Potential role of macrophages as immunoregulators of pregnancy. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1:119[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Metz CN, Bucala R 1997 Role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the regulation of the immune response. Adv Immunol 66:197–223[Medline]
  12. Nishihira J 2000 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): its essential role in the immune system and cell growth. J Interferon Cytokine Res 20:751–762[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Calandra T, Roger T 2003 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a regulator of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 3:791–800[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Arcuri F, Ricci C, Ietta F, Cintorino M, Tripodi SA, Cetin I, Garzia E, Schatz F, Klemi P, Santopietro R, Paulesu L 2001 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the human endometrium: expression and localization during the menstrual cycle and early pregnancy. Biol Reprod 64:1200–1205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Arcuri F, Cintorino M, Vatti R, Carducci A, Liberatori S, Paulesu L 1999 Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor transcript and protein by first-trimester human trophoblasts. Biol Reprod 60:1299–1303[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J 1975 Dating the endometrial biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 122:262–263[Medline]
  17. Akoum A, Lemay A, Brunet C, Hebert J 1995 Secretion of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 by cytokine-stimulated endometrial cells of women with endometriosis. Le groupe d’investigation en gynecologie. Fertil Steril 63:322–328[Medline]
  18. Calandra T, Bernhagen J, Metz CN, Spiegel LA, Bacher M, Donnelly T, Cerami A, Bucala R 1995 MIF as a glucocorticoid-induced modulator of cytokine production. Nature 377:68–71[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Kats R, Metz CN, Akoum A 2002 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor is markedly expressed in active and early-stage endometriotic lesions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:883–889[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Akoum A, Lemay A, Maheux R 2002 Estradiol and interleukin-1ß exert a synergistic stimulatory effect on the expression of the chemokine regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed, and secreted in endometriotic cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:5785–5792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Zygmunt M, Herr F, Keller-Schoenwetter S, Kunzi-Rapp K, Munstedt K, Rao CV, Lang U, Preissner KT 2002 Characterization of human chorionic gonadotropin as a novel angiogenic factor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:5290–5296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Calandra T, Bernhagen J, Mitchell RA, Bucala R 1994 The macrophage is an important and previously unrecognized source of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. J Exp Med 179:1895–1902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Akashi M, Shaw G, Hachiya M, Elstner E, Suzuki G, Koeffler P 1994 Number and location of AUUUA motifs: role in regulating transiently expressed RNAs. Blood 83:3182–3187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ross HJ, Sato N, Ueyama Y, Koeffler HP 1991 Cytokine messenger RNA stability is enhanced in tumor cells. Blood 77:1787–1795[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kosaka K, Fujiwara H, Tatsumi K, Yoshioka S, Sato Y, Egawa H, Higuchi T, Nakayama T, Ueda M, Maeda M, Fujii S 2002 Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) activates monocytes to produce interleukin-8 via a different pathway from luteinizing hormone/HCG receptor system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:5199–5208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wada S, Kudo T, Kudo M, Sakuragi N, Hareyama H, Nishihira J, Fujimoto S 1999 Induction of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in human ovary by human chorionic gonadotrophin. Hum Reprod 14:395–399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Wang B, Goff AK 2003 Interferon-{tau} stimulates secretion of macrophage migration inhibitory factor from bovine endometrial epithelial cells. Biol Reprod 69:1690–1696[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Zeng FY, Weiser WY, Kratzin H, Stahl B, Karas M, Gabius HJ 1993 The major binding protein of the interferon antagonist sarcolectin in human placenta is a macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Arch Biochem Biophys 303:74–80[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Hunt JS 1989 Cytokine networks in the uteroplacental unit: macrophages as pivotal regulatory cells. J Reprod Immunol 16:1–17[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Garcia-Velasco JA, Arici A, Zreik T, Naftolin F, Mor G 1999 Macrophage derived growth factors modulate Fas ligand expression in cultured endometrial stromal cells: a role in endometriosis. Mol Hum Reprod 5:642–650[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Yang Y, Degranpre P, Kharfi A, Akoum A 2000 Identification of macrophage migration inhibitory factor as a potent endothelial cell growth-promoting agent released by ectopic human endometrial cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4721–4727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Chesney J, Metz C, Bacher M, Peng T, Meinhardt A, Bucala R 1999 An essential role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in angiogenesis and the growth of a murine lymphoma. Mol Med 5:181–191[Medline]
  33. Ogawa H, Nishihira J, Sato Y, Kondo M, Takahashi N, Oshima T, Todo S 2000 An antibody for macrophage migration inhibitory factor suppresses tumour growth and inhibits tumour-associated angiogenesis. Cytokine 12:309–314[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Srisuparp S, Strakova Z, Fazleabas AT 2001 The role of chorionic gonadotropin (CG) in blastocyst implantation. Arch Med Res 32:627–634[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Willey KP 1999 An elusive role for glycosylation in the structure and function of reproductive hormones. Hum Reprod Update 5:330–355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. O’Reilly MS, Holmgren L, Shing Y, Chen C, Rosenthal RA, Moses M, Lane WS, Cao Y, Sage EH, Folkman J 1994 Angiostatin: a novel angiogenesis inhibitor that mediates the suppression of metastases by a Lewis lung carcinoma. Cell 79:315–328[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Bischof P 2001 Endocrine, paracrine and autocrine regulation of trophoblastic metalloproteinases. Early Pregnancy 5:30–31
  38. Onodera S, Kaneda K, Mizue Y, Koyama Y, Fujinaga M, Nishihira J 2000 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor up-regulates expression of matrix metalloproteinases in synovial fibroblasts of rheumatoid arthritis. J Biol Chem 275:444–450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Kanellopoulos-Langevin C, Caucheteux SM, Verbeke P, Ojcius DM 2003 Tolerance of the fetus by the maternal immune system: role of inflammatory mediators at the feto-maternal interface. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1:121[Medline]
  40. Kayisli UA, Selam B, Guzeloglu-Kayisli O, Demir R, Arici A 2003 Human chorionic gonadotropin contributes to maternal immunotolerance and endometrial apoptosis by regulating Fas-Fas ligand system. J Immunol 171:2305–2313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Loke YW, King A 2000 Immunology of implantation. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 14:827–837[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Croy BA, Ashkar AA, Minhas K, Greenwood JD 2000 Can murine uterine natural killer cells give insights into the pathogenesis of preeclampsia? J Soc Gynecol Investig 7:12–20[Medline]
  43. Miller JS 2001 The biology of natural killer cells in cancer, infection, and pregnancy. Exp Hematol 29:1157–1168[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Faust Z, Laskarin G, Rukavina D, Szekeres-Bartho J 1999 Progesterone-induced blocking factor inhibits degranulation of natural killer cells. Am J Reprod Immunol 42:71–75
  45. Apte RS, Sinha D, Mayhew E, Wistow GJ, Niederkorn JY 1998 Cutting edge: role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in inhibiting NK cell activity and preserving immune privilege. J Immunol 160:5693–5696[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Herrmann-Lavoie, C. V. Rao, and A. Akoum
Chorionic Gonadotropin Down-Regulates the Expression of the Decoy Inhibitory Interleukin 1 Receptor Type II in Human Endometrial Epithelial Cells
Endocrinology, November 1, 2007; 148(11): 5377 - 5384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.A. Campbell, L. O'Hara, R.D. Catalano, A.M. Sharkey, T.C. Freeman, and M. H. Johnson
Temporal expression profiling of the uterine luminal epithelium of the pseudo-pregnant mouse suggests receptivity to the fertilized egg is associated with complex transcriptional changes
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2495 - 2513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
C. V. Rao
Physiological and Pathological Relevance of Human Uterine LH/hCG Receptors
Reproductive Sciences, February 1, 2006; 13(2): 77 - 78.
[PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Kats, M. Al-Akoum, S. Guay, C. Metz, and A. Akoum
Cycle-dependent expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the human endometrium
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3518 - 3525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/5/2904    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akoum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Morin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akoum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Morin, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals