help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2004-2297
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Biermasz, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Roelfsema, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Biermasz, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Roelfsema, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 5 2731-2739
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

Morbidity after Long-Term Remission for Acromegaly: Persisting Joint-Related Complaints Cause Reduced Quality of Life

Nienke R. Biermasz, Alberto M. Pereira, Jan W. A. Smit, Johannes A. Romijn and Ferdinand Roelfsema

Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: N. R. Biermasz, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: nrbiermasz{at}lumc.nl.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Active acromegaly is associated with significant comorbidity and reduced quality of life. However, the prevalence of comorbidity after long-term remission is not established. Therefore, we assessed the presence of comorbidity in 118 patients in long-term remission after surgery, radiotherapy, and/or somatostatin analog treatment according to strict biochemical criteria of serum GH and IGF-I concentrations and evaluated the impact of comorbidity on quality of life. The mean duration of remission was 12.0 ± 7.4 yr, and mean actual IGF-I SD scores were 0.6 ± 1.7.

Self-reported joint problems occurred in 77% of patients, hypertension in 37%, a history of myocardial infarction in 9%, and diabetes mellitus in 11%. The presence of joint problems was not related to GH and IGF-I levels, active disease duration, or age. Joint complaints had significant negative impact on quality of life. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction had reduced scores for general health, depression, and fatigue, and diabetes mellitus was associated with reduced scores for anxiety and sleep.

In conclusion, acromegalic patients had a high prevalence of joint-related comorbidity and hypertension despite long-term control of GH excess. Especially, joint complaints contributed to a reduced perceived quality of life in these patients.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ACTIVE ACROMEGALY IS associated with complaints such as fatigue, joint pains, headache, paresthesias, and excessive perspiration. GH and IGF-I excess are also associated with an increased incidence of diseases including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, and heart disease (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). According to epidemiological morbidity studies, the prevalence of hypertension in active acromegaly is 25–35%. Overt diabetes mellitus occurs in 10–25% and osteoarthritis or joint complaints in 70% of the patients with active acromegaly (2, 6, 7, 8, 9). Consequently, active acromegaly is associated with increased mortality and significant morbidity and a reduced quality of life (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15).

Transsphenoidal surgery and treatment by somatostatin analogs are able to reduce serum GH and IGF-I excess to normal levels in 60–70% of the patients (14). Current combination treatment modalities, including the use of the GH receptor-blocking drug Pegvisomant (12, 16, 17, 18) induce biochemical remission in almost all patients (19, 20). After adequate control of GH excess or of GH effects, acromegalic symptoms decrease and metabolic disturbances and the increased mortality risk improve (10, 12, 14, 15, 19, 21, 22).

However, it is presently unclear to which extent these improvements translate into reduced comorbidity in the long term. Therefore, we assessed comorbidity in patients with long-term control of GH excess according to strict biochemical criteria in a cross-sectional study by an explorative symptom questionnaire in combination with quality of life assessment.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

All consecutive patients referred for treatment of acromegaly were collected in a database, and detailed yearly biochemical and clinical follow-up was performed from the onset of treatment. The first treatment option in the majority of patients was transsphenoidal surgery performed by a single specialist neurosurgeon. If necessary, adjuvant treatment was given by radiotherapy or somatostatin analogs. From 1998, primary treatment was given in the form of depot formulations of long-acting somatostatin analogs in some patients. Disease status was assessed yearly by oral glucose tolerance tests, measurement of random serum GH and IGF-I concentrations, and evaluation of pituitary function. Remission of acromegaly was defined as a normal glucose-suppressed serum GH less than 0.38 µg/liter (<1 mU/liter), a serum GH less than 1.9 µg/liter (<5 mU/liter), and a normal IGF-I for age. Strict control during somatostatin analog treatment was defined as a serum GH less than 1.9 µg/liter (<5 mU/liter) and a normal IGF-I for age (22). Patients were all followed by endocrinologists and not routinely by rheumatologists.

Protocol

For the present study, we selected all acromegalic patients treated and currently followed in our center, who were in long-term remission or strictly controlled on the basis of the above-mentioned criteria. Patient records were scrutinized for patient history, concomitant morbidity, and biochemical results. All patients were sent an explorative questionnaire to report actual complaints, diseases, and medication use. In addition, the patients were asked to participate in a quality of life assessment by completing four general health questionnaires and the Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACRO-QOL), a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (13).

A total of 131 patients in remission were asked to participate, and questionnaires were sent to their homes in prepaid envelopes. After 6 wk, nonresponders received a reminder letter, and thereafter they were contacted by telephone to encourage completion and return of the questionnaires. The response rate of completed questionnaires was 90% (118 of 131). Seven patients preferred not to participate in the study, and six patients did not respond. Thus, the overall response rate was 95%. The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee, and all subjects returning completed questionnaires gave written consent for participation.

Study parameters

Primary study parameters were the results of the morbidity questionnaire. The following items associated with acromegaly (1, 2, 6, 7) were scored: the presence of joint pain and/or stiffness, the number of affected joints, the presence of symptoms of overt cardiovascular disease and/or a history of cardiovascular events, the presence of pulmonary symptoms and/or pulmonary diseases, and the presence of diabetes mellitus, urolithiasis, sleep disturbances and snoring, concentration problems, memory problems, and perspiration. We also asked the patient their subjective health perception, the subjective perceived severity of living with acromegaly, their current work status, the ability to perform usual daily activities, and the number and the medications used. In addition to the data obtained from the questionnaires, we also used morbidity data available in the patients’ records. The diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in clinical practice was established when the systolic blood pressure was more than 140 mm Hg and/or a diastolic blood pressure was more than 90 mm Hg. For the present study, hypertension was defined as the current use of blood-pressure-lowering drugs for the indication of hypertension or a blood pressure higher than the above-mentioned values. The diagnosis and treatment of diabetes mellitus in clinical practice was based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (fasting glucose > 7 mmol/liter or 2 h post-glucose load > 11.1 mmol/liter) (23).

The outcome of the questionnaires was compared with the findings from the patients’ records.

Furthermore, the outcomes were related to patient characteristics (age and sex), treatment modalities (surgery, radiotherapy, and somatostatin analogs), duration and severity of GH excess (remission or active disease during assessment, duration of disease before start of treatment, the duration of active disease, and serum GH and IGF-I concentrations at time of questionnaire), and presence of any form of hypopituitarism defined as the need for replacement therapy.

Other study parameters were the results of a disease-specific questionnaire (ACRO-QOL) developed by Webb et al. (13) and four health-related quality of life questionnaires: Short Form 36 (SF-36), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Multidimensional Fatigue Index (MFI-20), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

The SF-36 assesses general well-being during the previous 30 d on a scale of 0 (bad) to 100 (good) and is subdivided into eight subscales studying limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities because of physical health or emotional problems, bodily pain, general mental health, vitality, and general health perceptions and health change (24, 25, 26). Because the HADS and the MFI-20 (see below) are more specific questionnaires for mental health, vitality and general mental health were left out in this evaluation. Reference values were derived from the paper by Van der Zee and Sanderman (27). The NHP assesses general well-being with 38 yes/no questions, which are subdivided into six scales, i.e. pain, energy, sleep, emotional reactions, social isolation, and physical mobility (28, 29). Subscale scores represent a weighted mean of the associated items and are expressed as a value between 0 (good) and 100 (bad). Reference values were derived from the study by Hinz et al. (30). The MFI-20 comprises 20 statements to assess fatigue, with the following dimensions: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation, and mental fatigue (31). Scores vary from 0 (good) to 20 (bad). Age-related Dutch reference values were derived from the study by Smets et al. (32). The HADS assesses anxiety and depression by 14 items. Scores for the anxiety and depression subscale range from 0 (good) to 21 (bad) and for the total score from 0–42 (33). Dutch reference values of the general population were derived from the paper by Spinhoven et al. (34, 35).

Assays and normal values

GH was measured with a sensitive immunofluorometric assay (Wallac, Turku, Finland), specific for the 22-kDA GH protein and calibrated against WHO International Reference Preparation 80/505. The detection limit was 0.01 µg/liter, and the interassay variation coefficient was 1.6–8.4% between 0.1 and 15 µg/liter. For conversion of µg/liter to mU/liter, multiply by 2.6. A random serum GH below 1.9 µg/liter (<5 mU/liter) was considered a safe level according to various mortality studies (10, 11, 14). After oral glucose loading (75 g), a normal suppressed serum GH was less than 0.38 µg/liter (<1 mU/liter) (16, 36). Serum IGF-I concentration was determined using a RIA available since 1985 (Incstar, Stillwater, MN), with a detection limit of 11 µg/liter and interassay variation less than 11%. Normal values were expressed as age-related SD scores from normal values derived from 137 healthy controls (37).

After surgery and radiotherapy, the combination of glucose-suppressed serum GH less than 0.38 µg/liter, a serum GH less than 1.9 µg/liter, and normal IGF-I for age was used to define remission, whereas during medical treatment a serum GH less than 1.9 µg/liter and a normal IGF-I were used to indicate control of disease. To facilitate reading of the present manuscript, patients with controlled disease during somatostatin analog treatment were also named in remission.

Treatment for hypopituitarism was started as necessary, based on the postoperative or yearly follow-up evaluations. The thyroid and (male) gonadal axis were assessed by basal hormone measurements, whereas the adrenal axis was evaluated by CRH stimulation test. In premenopausal women, hypogonadism was diagnosed by oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea and low gonadotropins. In the present study, hypopituitarism was defined as the need for replacement therapy for one or more axes. Patients in this study were not routinely screened for GH deficiency.

Statistical analysis

SPSS for Windows version 11.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and Systat version 10.2 (Systat Inc., Richmond, CA) were used to perform data analysis. Data were expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise mentioned. We used two-tailed Student’s t tests for unpaired data and the {chi}2 test to compare means of the different groups. Independent variables affecting quality of life were explored with stepwise linear regression analysis and are expressed as standardized ß-coefficients and P values. We used literature reference data for quality of life questionnaires for comparison with acromegaly patients, and these were weighted means according to the age distribution in our cohort.

We did not compose a separate control group to assess the prevalence of morbidity in the general population, because the prevalence of hypertension, joint-related complaints, and diabetes mellitus have been carefully established in four recent large Dutch epidemiological studies (38, 39, 40, 41). These reports give an actual, precise reflection of prevalence in the Dutch general population. We statistically compared the prevalence in acromegaly patients with the reported proportions (38, 39, 40, 41) by {chi}2 test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient and treatment characteristics

We studied 118 patients, 61 male and 57 female with a mean age of 58.6 ± 12.9 yr. Primary transsphenoidal surgery was performed in 108 patients. The other patients were treated initially with octreotide (7) and radiotherapy (2), whereas one patient was in remission after pituitary apoplexy.

At the time, all 118 patients were considered in remission according to glucose-suppressed serum GH, random GH, and IGF-I levels. Sixty-two of the 118 patients were in remission by surgery alone, whereas 37 patients had been previously treated by radiotherapy and 27 were well controlled during octreotide LAR therapy. The mean estimated duration of disease until remission (date of remission minus the estimate date of onset of disease) was 9.9 ± 8.2 yr (range, 1–45). At the time of the present study, the mean duration of remission was 12.0 ± 7.4 yr, mean serum GH concentration was 0.58 ± 0.7 µg/liter, and mean IGF-I SD score was 0.6 ± 1.7 SD.

Any pituitary insufficiency was present in 40% of patients. Irradiated patients had a higher frequency of hypopituitarism than nonirradiated patients (76 vs. 23%; P < 0.001). Hydrocortisone replacement therapy was given to 30 patients, T4 replacement to 28 patients, and testosterone replacement to 16 of 61 male patients. Four of the 28 female patients below the age of 60 yr received estrogen replacement therapy. Two patients with biochemically confirmed GH deficiency after radiotherapy were treated by recombinant human GH replacement.

Morbidity in successfully treated acromegaly (Table 1Go)

Joint-related complaints. Joint-related complaints were reported by 77% of the patients. These consisted of joint pains in 67% and stiffness in 61% of patients. The presence of joint stiffness only was reported by 10%, pain only by 16%, and both pain and stiffness by 51% of the 118 included patients. Thirty-one percent reported to require analgesic drugs on a regular basis for this indication. Five patients (4%) had received joint replacement surgery (knee or hip). The joints most frequently affected are shown in Fig. 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Prevalence of comorbidity in 118 long-term well-controlled patients with acromegaly

 


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Percentage of pain (top, gray bars) and stiffness (bottom, white bars) at various joints in patients in remission after treatment for acromegaly. In a large proportion of patients, multiple sites are affected.

 
Cardiovascular symptoms. Thirty-seven percent of patients reported the presence of hypertension, in complete agreement with the data obtained from the records of the patients. A history of myocardial infarction was present in 9%, and previous cerebrovascular disease in 10% of the patients. Fifteen percent of patients reported palpitations, although only 6% of patients had arrhythmias according to the hospital records. Chest pains were present in 28% of patients, whereas in the records angina pectoris was confirmed and/or treated in only 6%. Twenty-two percent of patients reported peripheral edema, and 11% had symptoms suggestive of peripheral arterial vascular disease.

Respiratory symptoms. Dyspnea was reported by 26% of patients, coughing by 17%, and productive cough by 21% of patients. Nine percent of patients reported the use of pulmonary inhalator medication.

Snoring was present in 57% of patients, and only 31% of the patients experienced good sleep.

Metabolic diseases. Eleven percent of patients were treated for diabetes, 8% with oral hypoglycemic drugs, and the remaining 3% with insulin. A history of urolithiasis was present in 5% of patients.

Malignant diseases. Twelve of the included 118 patients in remission (10%) had a history of malignancy: prostate carcinoma (n = 1), renal cell carcinoma (n = 1), larynx carcinoma (n = 1), colon carcinoma (n = 3), thyroid carcinoma (n = 2), bronchus carcinoma (n = 1), mola hydatosa (n = 1), and sarcoma (n = 1). All but one was considered successfully treated for malignancy.

Other symptoms associated with acromegaly. Paresthesias were reported in 40% of patients in remission. The percentage of patients who had surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome in the course of their disease was 18%. Excessive perspiration was reported by 30% of patients, memory problems by 36%, and concentration problems by 25% of patients.

Psychosocial morbidity. At present, of 41 males under the age of retirement (65 yr), 68% conducted a professional occupation, 24% had incomplete or complete disability for work, and the others reported otherwise. Of 36 females under the age of 65, 36% had a professional occupation, 31% were (in)completely disabled, and the other 33% reported to be housewife or otherwise.

Ability to conduct a normal pattern of daily activities was reported by 82% of 118 patients, whereas 25% of the patients required help for some activities.

The influence of morbidity on quality of life

The presence of joint problems, cardiovascular complications, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension was related to quality of life parameters as assessed with five different questionnaires. A highly significant impact on quality of life was observed for the presence of joint-related complaints, with reduced scores especially for the physical and general subscales and less pronounced for the mental subscales (Table 2Go). Interestingly, no differences were present between patients with and without joint problems for age, mean serum GH and IGF-I concentrations, the estimated duration of active acromegaly, and the duration of remission. Only female sex was associated with a higher prevalence of joint problems.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Summary of quality of life assessments between patients in remission with and without joint complaints and controls

 
In a linear regression model with quality of life scores as independent variables, we entered step-wise the following dependent parameters: age, sex, the duration of acromegaly, the actual serum GH concentration, applied radiotherapy, and the presence of joint problems, as shown in Table 3Go. Age, duration of disease, and applied radiotherapy were significant independent factors for some quality of life parameters. Interestingly, the presence of self-reported joint problems significantly negatively affected all SF-36 items, including the emotional and social aspects. Most fatigue subscales were negatively influenced by the presence of joint problems, as were all ACRO-QOL items and total HADS score and pain, sleep, and total score of the NHP.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Linear regression analysis of factors determining quality of life in 118 patients in remission after treatment for acromegaly

 
The influence of other comorbidity on quality of life was also assessed. In addition to the above-mentioned factors, we added the presence of hypertension, malignancy in history, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and diabetes mellitus in the stepwise regression analysis. As shown in Table 4Go, the independent effect of joint problems on quality of life on various assessed subscales remained present. Moreover, patients with a previous history of myocardial infarction had reduced quality of life for general health, depression scales, and fatigue scales. Diabetes mellitus was associated with reduced scores for anxiety and sleep.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Linear regression analysis of factors determining quality of life in 118 patients in remission after treatment for acromegaly

 
The prevalence of comorbidity in acromegaly in comparison with the general population (Table 5Go)

Hypertension was present in 37% of patients in remission after treatment for acromegaly with a mean age of 58 yr. The prevalence was 7.4% in acromegalic patients under 50 yr, 45% in patients aged 50–70 yr, and 56% in patients over 70 yr of age. In the Dutch general population, the prevalence of hypertension is 21% for male patients and 14.9% for female patients aged 30–59 yr (39). Between 50 and 70 yr, the prevalence of hypertension increases from approximately 22% to approximately 35%, and over 70 yr the prevalence is approximately 50% in the general population (41). Thus, in the younger acromegalic patients in remission (<59 yr), the prevalence is not significantly increased compared with the general population, whereas the prevalence of hypertension is increased in acromegalic patients from 50–70 yr, i.e. 45 vs. 22–35% (P < 0.001). In patients over 70 yr, the prevalence is not increased.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Prevalence of comorbidity in 118 successfully treated acromegalic patients in comparison with available Dutch control data from literature

 
Diabetes mellitus in our cohort was present in 11% of patients. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in the Dutch population aged 50–74 yr is 8.3% (40). In patients with acromegaly aged 50–74 yr, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 9.5%, suggesting a normal risk for diabetes mellitus in successfully treated acromegalic patients (P value not significant).

Joint pain and/or stiffness were reported by 77% of patients in remission, and the presence was not affected by age. In the general population, self-reported musculoskeletal diseases are reported by 41% of males and 45% of females (38). In the same cohort, the prevalence of (self-reported) osteoarthritis of the knee was 11.8% and of the hip 6.8%. There was an increasing prevalence of osteoarthritis at the knee and hip with age in the general population. The prevalence of osteoarthritis of hip and knee reported by the general population (38) vs. self-reported knee and hip pain or stiffness in acromegaly patients are summarized in Fig. 2Go, showing a increased prevalence of knee and hip problems in successfully treated acromegaly (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Percentage of successfully treated acromegaly patients experiencing knee (top) and hip (bottom) pain or stiffness, suspect for osteoarthritis, divided in 10-yr age cohorts (solid lines). Data are compared with prevalence of osteoarthritis at the hip and knee present in the general Dutch population as derived from the study by Picavet and Hazes (38 ) (dotted lines).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This is the first report on the prevalence of persisting comorbidity in a long-term followed cohort of acromegalic patients after successful treatment according to strict biochemical criteria. In these patients, there was a high prevalence of joint-related complaints and hypertension. Other conditions such as a history of malignancy, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and diabetes were present in 10% of patients in remission. In particular, the presence of joint problems was associated with reduced quality of life as assessed by various health-related quality of life questionnaires.

In this cross-sectional study, all patients in remission or well controlled from our center were asked to participate, and there was a high response rate. Therefore, we were able to study nearly the complete cohort of successfully treated patients. Patients were treated by primary transsphenoidal surgery (in most cases) followed by adjuvant treatment as necessary or primary medical therapy aiming at immediate strict biochemical remission from the onset of the study as previously described (16, 19). Thus, patients were treated according to the recent consensus criteria throughout the entire follow-up ranging from 1977–2003 (42, 43, 44).

According to epidemiological morbidity studies in active acromegaly, the prevalence of hypertension is reported to be 25–35%. Overt diabetes mellitus occurs in 10–25% and osteoarthritis in 70% of patients with active acromegaly (2, 6, 7, 8, 9). After long-term remission, we report similar percentages affected by hypertension and joint problems, albeit in patients with a higher mean age than reported in literature of active acromegaly. Diabetes mellitus was less frequently observed in our cohort than reported for active acromegaly. Thus, in this large study of treated acromegaly, we report comparable high prevalence of hypertension and joint-related complaints as have been reported for active acromegaly, despite long-term biochemical remission. In the only study in cured acromegaly patients after transsphenoidal surgery, Serri et al. (45) reported similar prevalence as we found, i.e. diabetes mellitus present in two of 34 patients (~6%) and hypertension in 32%.

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in acromegaly with long-term remission is comparable to Dutch normative values. The prevalence of hypertension is increased, especially in middle-aged acromegalic patients (aged 50–70 yr). Joint-related complaints of the knee and hip in successfully treated acromegaly were increased compared with normative data. Prevalence of all assessed morbidity parameters is largely dependent on, for example, age and ethnicity. Therefore, we compared comorbidity prevalence of patients treated for acromegaly with normative Dutch control data. These large epidemiological studies give an accurate estimate of the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and joint-related complaints in the population from which the studied acromegaly patients originated. Although the methods of investigation were different from our method, we believe that the use of the normative data provided by these studies is justified. A proportion of the general population was unaware of the diagnosis hypertension (41) and diabetes mellitus (40) before the population study. Because blood pressure and glucose levels were measured regularly in all acromegalic patients, we assume it unlikely that these conditions were underdiagnosed in our cohort. The design of our study did not allow comparison of cumulative incidences of malignancy and cardiovascular complications between acromegalic patients in remission and control values. Because the presence of a history of these conditions significantly influenced quality of life parameters, these data were reported in this cross-sectional study without comparison with the normal population.

The presence of joint problems was associated with a considerable impairment of quality of life, measured by several questionnaires in acromegaly, also when corrected for other comorbidity. In acromegalic patients without joint problems, quality of life was equal to normative literature reference data. For the evaluation of the impact of comorbidity on quality of life, however, the control data should also be adjusted for high-prevalent comorbidity such as joint-related complaints (46). Interestingly, Picavet and Hoeymans (47) also observed a significant negative impact of both musculoskeletal disease and osteoarthritis on all SF-36 items in a large randomly selected population study. In this population, physical scores of the SF-36 were most severely affected, but also the other SF-36 subscales were significantly affected. These data further support that joint-related complaints are indeed an important determinant of quality of life irrespective of the presence of previous GH excess. Patients in remission after treatment for acromegaly without joint-related complaints have the same SF-36 scores as the controls from the general population without osteoarthritis derived from the study by Picavet and Hoeymans (data not shown) (47). Furthermore, acromegalic patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip have similar scores than the controls with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip derived from the Picavet study (47).

The joint-related complaints of acromegaly are thus persistent also after long-term remission and were not related to actual disease status or duration of active acromegaly as also previously reported (8, 48, 49). The early stage of acromegalic arthropathy is characterized by joint widening, soft tissue and cartilage hypertrophy, and joint hypermobility. This stage is likely fully reversible, as can be observed during overtreatment of recombinant human GH in GH-deficient adults. Thereafter, cartilage ulcers, subchondral cysts, arthricular narrowing, osteophyte formation, limitations of movements, and degenerative osteoarthritis occur, and these changes are probably irreversible (21, 50). Acromegalic arthropathy affects both the axial as well as the appendicular skeleton (knee, shoulder, elbow, ankle, hip, and hands). In this cross-sectional study, we were not able to relate the presence of joint-related complaints to any of the assessed patient characteristics including age, duration of disease, and serum GH and IGF-I concentrations. Only female sex was associated with a higher prevalence of joint-related complaints in the present study. In addition, the prevalence of joint stiffness and joint pains in 17 patients with residual disease followed in our center was 70 and 76%, respectively, not significantly different compared with the prevalence in well-controlled patients. This finding could suggest that once damage has occurred the joint problems persist unrelated to GH and IGF-I. Because of the small size of this group and other statistical considerations, we feel that we cannot address this important issue in more detail in the present study. The cause and individual differences in the severity of persisting arthropathy require further investigation.

The current effective GH- and IGF-I-lowering treatments are able to reduce subjective joint-related complaints, and also objective parameters such as cartilage thickness as measured by ultrasonography improve upon adequate treatment, although they do not seem to normalize (51, 52). At present, there is no effective treatment for the disabling persisting joint pains, associated with acromegaly, except for replacement surgery and use of analgesics.

In conclusion, we observed a high prevalence of joint-related comorbidity in a cohort of patients in long-term remission after treatment for acromegaly. Especially, joint pains and stiffness contributed to a reduced perceived quality of life.


    Footnotes
 
First Published Online March 1, 2005

Abbreviations: ACRO-QOL, Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; MFI-20, Multidimensional Fatigue Index; NHP, Nottingham Health Profile; SF-36, Short Form 36.

Received November 23, 2004.

Accepted February 16, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ben Shlomo A, Melmed S 2001 Acromegaly. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 30:565–583, vi[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Nabarro JD 1987 Acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 26:481–512[Medline]
  3. Pereira AM, van Thiel SW, Lindner JR, Roelfsema F, van der Wall EE, Morreau H, Smit JW, Romijn JA, Bax JJ 2004 Increased prevalence of regurgitant valvular heart disease in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:71–75[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Colao A, Spinelli L, Marzullo P, Pivonello R, Petretta M, Di Somma C, Vitale G, Bonaduce D, Lombardi G 2003 High prevalence of cardiac valve disease in acromegaly: an observational, analytical, case-control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:3196–3201[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Colao A, Cuocolo A, Marzullo P, Nicolai E, Ferone D, Della Morte AM, Pivonello R, Salvatore M, Lombardi G 2001 Is the acromegalic cardiomyopathy reversible? Effect of 5-year normalization of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I levels on cardiac performance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1551–1557[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ezzat S, Forster MJ, Berchtold P, Redelmeier DA, Boerlin V, Harris AG 1994 Acromegaly. Clinical and biochemical features in 500 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 73:233–240[Medline]
  7. Molitch ME 1992 Clinical manifestations of acromegaly. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 21:597–614[Medline]
  8. Podgorski M, Robinson B, Weissberger A, Stiel J, Wang S, Brooks PM 1988 Articular manifestations of acromegaly. Aust N Z J Med 18:28–35[Medline]
  9. Layton MW, Fudman EJ, Barkan A, Braunstein EM, Fox IH 1988 Acromegalic arthropathy. Characteristics and response to therapy. Arthritis Rheum 31:1022–1027[Medline]
  10. Bates AS, Van’t Hoff W, Jones JM, Clayton RN 1993 An audit of outcome of treatment in acromegaly. Q J Med 86:293–299
  11. Orme SM, McNally RJ, Cartwright RA, Belchetz PE 1998 Mortality and cancer incidence in acromegaly: a retrospective cohort study. United Kingdom Acromegaly Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2730–2734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Swearingen B, Barker FG, Katznelson L, Biller BM, Grinspoon S, Klibanski A, Moayeri N, Black PM, Zervas NT 1998 Long-term mortality after transsphenoidal surgery and adjunctive therapy for acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3419–3426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Webb SM, Prieto L, Badia X, Albareda M, Catala M, Gaztambide S, Lucas T, Paramo C, Pico A, Lucas A, Halperin I, Obiols G, Astorga R 2002 Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACROQOL) a new health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with acromegaly: development and psychometric properties. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 57:251–258[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Beauregard C, Truong U, Hardy J, Serri O 2003 Long-term outcome and mortality after transsphenoidal adenomectomy for acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 58:86–91[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Holdaway IM, Rajasoorya RC, Gamble GD 2004 Factors influencing mortality in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:667–674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Biermasz NR, van Dulken H, Roelfsema F 2000 Ten-year follow-up results of transsphenoidal microsurgery in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4596–4602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lancranjan I, Atkinson AB 1999 Results of a European multicentre study with Sandostatin LAR in acromegalic patients. Sandostatin LAR Group. Pituitary 1:105–114[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Cozzi R, Attanasio R, Montini M, Pagani G, Lasio G, Lodrini S, Barausse M, Albizzi M, Dallabonzana D, Pedroncelli AM 2003 Four-year treatment with octreotide-long-acting repeatable in 110 acromegalic patients: predictive value of short-term results? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:3090–3098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Biermasz NR, Dekker FW, Pereira AM, Van Thiel SW, Schutte PJ, van Dulken H, Romijn JA, Roelfsema F 2004 Determinants of survival in treated acromegaly in a single center: predictive value of serial insulin-like growth factor I measurements. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2789–2796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. van der Lely AJ, Hutson RK, Trainer PJ, Besser GM, Barkan AL, Katznelson L, Klibanski A, Herman-Bonert V, Melmed S, Vance ML, Freda PU, Stewart PM, Friend KE, Clemmons DR, Johannsson G, Stavrou S, Cook DM, Phillips LS, Strasburger CJ, Hackett S, Zib KA, Davis RJ, Scarlett JA, Thorner MO 2001 Long-term treatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant, a growth hormone receptor antagonist. Lancet 358:1754–1759[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, Lombardi G 2004 Systemic complications of acromegaly: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Endocr Rev 25:102–152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Biermasz NR, Thiel van SW, Pereira AM, Hoftijzer HC, Hemert van AM, Smit JW, Romijn JA, Roelfsema F 2004 Decreased quality of life in patients with acromegaly despite long-term cure of GH excess. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:5369–5376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. World Health Organization 1999 Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus: report of a WHO consultation. Publication WHO/NCD/NCS/99.2.1999. Geneva: World Health Organization
  24. Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD 1992 The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483[Medline]
  25. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L 1992 Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 305:160–164
  26. van der Zee KI, Sanderman R, Heyink J 1996 A comparison of two multidimensional measures of health status: the Nottingham Health Profile and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Qual Life Res 5:165–174[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Van der Zee KI, Sanderman R 1992 Het meten van de algemene gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36, een handleiding. Groningen, Nederland: Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken
  28. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Backett EM, Williams J, Papp E 1980 A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health 34:281–286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Hunt SM, McEwen J 1980 The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Health Illn 2:231–246[Medline]
  30. Hinz A, Klaiberg A, Schumacher J, Brahler E 2003 [The psychometric quality of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) in the general population]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 53:353–358 (German)[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC 1995 The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 39:315–325[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Smets EM, Visser MR, Willems-Groot AF, Garssen B, Schuster-Uitterhoeve AL, De Haes JC 1998 Fatigue and radiotherapy: (B) experience in patients 9 months following treatment. Br J Cancer 78:907–912[Medline]
  33. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP 1983 The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370[Medline]
  34. Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers PP, Kempen GI, Speckens AE, Van Hemert AM 1997 A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med 27:363–370[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Watt T, Groenvold M, Bjorner JB, Noerholm V, Rasmussen NA, Bech P 2000 Fatigue in the Danish general population. Influence of sociodemographic factors and disease. J Epidemiol Community Health 54:827–833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. van den Berg G, Pincus SM, Frolich M, Veldhuis JD, Roelfsema F 1998 Reduced disorderliness of growth hormone release in biochemically inactive acromegaly after pituitary surgery. Eur J Endocrinol 138:164–169[Abstract]
  37. Janssen YJ, Frolich M, Roelfsema F 1997 A low starting dose of genotropin in growth hormone-deficient adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:129–135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Picavet HSJ, Hazes JMW 2003 Prevalence of self reported musculoskeletal diseases is high. Ann Rheum Dis 62:644–650[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Schelleman H, Klungel OH, Kromhout D, de Boer A, Stricker BH, Verschuren WM 2004 Prevalence and determinants of undertreatment of hypertension in the Netherlands. J Hum Hypertens 18:317–324[Medline]
  40. Mooy JM, Grootenhuis PA, de Vries H, Valkenburg HA, Bouter LM, Kostense PJ, Heine RJ 1995 Prevalence and determinants of glucose intolerance in a Dutch Caucasian population. The Hoorn Study. Diabetes Care 18:1270–1273[Abstract]
  41. van Rossum CTM, van de Mheen H, Witteman JCM, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Grobbee DE 2000 Prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension by sociodemographic factors among the Dutch elderly. Hypertension 35:814–821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Giustina A, Barkan A, Casanueva FF, Cavagnini F, Frohman L, Ho K, Veldhuis J, Wass J, von Werder K, Melmed S 2000 Criteria for cure of acromegaly: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:526–529[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. 2004 Biochemical assessment and long-term monitoring in patients with acromegaly: statement from a joint consensus conference of The Growth Hormone Research Society and The Pituitary Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:3099–3102
  44. Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Cavagnini F, Chanson P, Frohman L, Grossman A, Ho K, Kleinberg D, Lamberts S, Laws E, Lombardi G, Vance ML, Werder KV, Wass J, Giustina A 2002 Guidelines for acromegaly management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4054–4058[Free Full Text]
  45. Serri O, Beauregard C, Hardy J 2004 Long-term biochemical status and disease-related morbidity in 53 postoperative patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:658–661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. van Manen JG, Bindels PJ, Dekker FW, Bottema BJ, van der Zee JS, Ijzermans CJ, Schade E 2003 The influence of COPD on health-related quality of life independent of the influence of comorbidity. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1177–1184[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Picavet HSJ, Hoeymans N 2004 Health related quality of life in multiple musculoskeletal diseases: SF-36 and EQ-5D in the DMC3 study. Ann Rheum Dis 63:723–729[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Dons RF, Rosselet P, Pastakia B, Doppman J, Gorden P 1988 Arthropathy in acromegalic patients before and after treatment: a long-term follow-up study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 28:515–524[Medline]
  49. Bluestone R, Bywaters E, Hartog M, Holt PJL, Hyde S 1971 Acromegalic arthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 30:243–258[Free Full Text]
  50. Erdheim J 1931 Uber Wirbelsaulenveranderungen bei Akromegalie. Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med 281:197
  51. Colao A, Marzullo P, Vallone G, Marino V, Annecchino M, Ferone D, De Brasi D, Scarpa R, Oriente P, Lombardi G 1998 Reversibility of joint thickening in acromegalic patients: an ultrasonography study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2121–2125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Colao A, Cannavo S, Marzullo P, Pivonello R, Squadrito S, Vallone G, Almoto B, Bichisao E, Trimarchi F, Lombardi G 2003 Twelve months of treatment with octreotide-LAR reduces joint thickness in acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 148:31–38[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. R. Biermasz, M. J. E. Wassenaar, A. A. van der Klaauw, A. M. Pereira, J. W. A. Smit, F. Roelfsema, R. Wolterbeek, H. M. Kroon, M. Kloppenburg, and J. A. Romijn
Pretreatment Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Concentrations Predict Radiographic Osteoarthritis in Acromegalic Patients with Long-Term Cured Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2009; 94(7): 2374 - 2379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Wexler, L. Gunnell, Z. Omer, K. Kuhlthau, C. Beauregard, G. Graham, A. L. Utz, B. Biller, L. Nachtigall, J. Loeffler, et al.
Growth Hormone Deficiency Is Associated with Decreased Quality of Life in Patients with Prior Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2009; 94(7): 2471 - 2477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
M J E Wassenaar, N R Biermasz, N van Duinen, A A van der Klaauw, A M Pereira, F Roelfsema, J W A Smit, H M Kroon, M Kloppenburg, and J A Romijn
High prevalence of arthropathy, according to the definitions of radiological and clinical osteoarthritis, in patients with long-term cure of acromegaly: a case-control study
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2009; 160(3): 357 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. J. C. M. M. Neggers, M. O. van Aken, W. W. de Herder, R. A. Feelders, J. A. M. J. L. Janssen, X. Badia, S. M. Webb, and A. J. van der Lely
Quality of Life in Acromegalic Patients during Long-Term Somatostatin Analog Treatment with and without Pegvisomant
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2008; 93(10): 3853 - 3859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Miller, H. Doll, J. David, and J. Wass
Impact of musculoskeletal disease on quality of life in long-standing acromegaly
Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 158(5): 587 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
M. P Matta, E. Couture, L. Cazals, D. Vezzosi, A. Bennet, and P. Caron
Impaired quality of life of patients with acromegaly: control of GH/IGF-I excess improves psychological subscale appearance
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2008; 158(3): 305 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
B Havekes, A A van der Klaauw, H C Hoftijzer, J C Jansen, A G L van der Mey, A H J T Vriends, J W A Smit, J A Romijn, and E P M Corssmit
Reduced quality of life in patients with head-and-neck paragangliomas
Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 158(2): 247 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. M. Dekkers, N. R. Biermasz, A. M. Pereira, J. A. Romijn, and J. P. Vandenbroucke
Mortality in Acromegaly: A Metaanalysis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 61 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
G. T'Sjoen, M. Bex, D. Maiter, B. Velkeniers, and R. Abs
Health-related quality of life in acromegalic subjects: data from AcroBel, the Belgian Registry on acromegaly
Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 157(4): 411 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Georgitsi, A. Raitila, A. Karhu, K. Tuppurainen, M. J. Makinen, O. Vierimaa, R. Paschke, W. Saeger, R. B. van der Luijt, T. Sane, et al.
Molecular diagnosis of pituitary adenoma predisposition caused by aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein gene mutations
PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 4101 - 4105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. Melmed
Acromegaly
N. Engl. J. Med., December 14, 2006; 355(24): 2558 - 2573.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Kauppinen-Makelin, T. Sane, H. Sintonen, H. Markkanen, M. J. Valimaki, E. Loyttyniemi, L. Niskanen, A. Reunanen, U.-H. Stenman, and and the Finnish Acromegaly Study Group
Quality of Life in Treated Patients with Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3891 - 3896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Biermasz, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Roelfsema, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Biermasz, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Roelfsema, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals