| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology (A.C., C.D.S., F.R., G.L.), Department of Pediatrics (M.S.), "Federico II" University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; Division of Pediatric Endocrinology (S.D.M., A.K.), Santobono Hospital of Naples, 80123 Naples, Italy; and Emergency Unit, "S. Maria degli Incurabili" Hospital of Naples (S.S.), 80131 Naples, Italy
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Annamaria Colao M.D., Ph.D., Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, "Federico II," University of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy. E-mail: colao{at}unina.it.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Serum IGF-I levels were in the normal range for age in all patients before GH withdrawal. When compared with controls, before GH withdrawal, GHD adolescents had reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and increased total/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, fibrinogen, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and glucose levels; non-GHD adolescents had increased glucose, insulin, and homeostasis model assessment score. IMT at the common carotid arteries was similar in GHD and controls (0.52 ± 0.03 vs. 0.55 ± 0.06 mm; P = 0.23) and was higher in non-GHD than in controls (0.62 ± 0.03 vs. 0.54 ± 0.06 mm; P = 0.01). In GHD adolescents, 6 months of GH treatment withdrawal and 6 months of GH treatment reinstitution modified IGF-I levels, lipid profile, and insulin resistance but not IMT or systolic and diastolic peak velocities at the common carotid arteries. In non-GHD subjects, 12 months of GH treatment withdrawal significantly decreased IGF-I levels, IMT (to 0.54 ± 0.06 mm; P < 0.001 vs. baseline), systolic and diastolic peak velocities, and improved insulin resistance.
In conclusion, the discontinuation of GH in confirmed GHD adolescents is not followed by significant alterations of the common carotid arteries, despite the profound negative alterations of the lipid profile. In adolescents who were not confirmed to have GHD, IMT was increased while on GH therapy and normalized when they were taken off of GH.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The current practice for childhood GHD patients is to stop GH replacement at final height (21). The persistence of GHD is then reevaluated by appropriate GH testing because one third to one half of the patients with GHD during childhood do not have persistent severe GHD later on in adulthood (22, 23). The discontinuation of GH therapy in adolescents with severe GHD for 1 yr causes the accumulation of cardiovascular risk factors such as increase of total body and abdominal fat mass, a decrease of lean body mass, and an increase of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B, with a decrease of high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (24). Lipid alterations in these young patients are particularly relevant, because increased total and LDL-cholesterol levels during adolescence have been shown to predict IMT later on in life in non-hypopituitary subjects (25). We had previously shown that GH discontinuation is inappropriate in adolescents with severe GHD because it induces impairment of lipid profile and cardiac morphology and performance (26). In a cross-sectional study by Lanes et al. (27), however, no difference in cardiac mass and function and in the atherosclerotic profile was found in GHD adolescents during GH replacement, in those studied at the diagnosis of GHD (and thus not receiving GH) or in healthy adolescents.
This prospective study was designed to investigate the risk of early atherosclerosis in GHD adolescents during GH replacement and withdrawal. The classical cardiovascular risk factors such as IMT and systolic and diastolic peak velocities at the common carotid arteries, were measured in adolescent GHD patients reaching their final height within 6 months of stopping GH replacement and 6 months after GH treatment was restarted. The results were compared with sex- and age-matched healthy adolescents who served as a control group and to patients who were not confirmed to have GHD at retesting.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twenty-three adolescent patients with GHD during childhood (10 boys and 13 girls, aged 1520 yr) with adult bone age and completed puberty (Tanner stages IVV) and a mean height SD score of 0.27 ± 0.31 were studied. GHD had been diagnosed 4.512.3 yr before entering the study by two classical stimulation tests [insulin tolerance test, clonidine or arginine with peak GH concentrations < 10 µg/liter and arginine plus GHRH (ARG+GHRH) with peak GH concentrations < 20 µg/liter]. Fourteen patients had idiopathic, isolated GHD, whereas the remaining nine had organic GHD within a context of hypopituitarism (Table 1
). All of the patients from the latter group had been treated by surgery alone (n = 6) or associated with radiotherapy (n = 3, nos. 15, 21, and 22; Table 1
), for pituitary lesions. All of the patients had received GH in the past for a period of 8.9 ± 1.9 yr. Hormone replacement therapy with L-T4 (50100 µg by mouth daily), cortisone acetate (2537.5 mg/d), and 1-disamino-ß-D-arginine vasopressin (520 µg/d) was given where appropriate. Hypogonadism was treated in boys with testosterone enanthate (250 mg im monthly) and in girls with standard oral estrogen/progestin association. An adequacy of hormone replacement therapy was periodically assessed by serum free thyroid hormones and testosterone and urinary free cortisol together with serum and urinary Na+ and K+ measurements.
|
Controls
Twenty-three healthy adolescents (10 boys and 13 girls, aged 1520 yr) comparable for age (±), sex, pubertal status, BMI (±1) participated in the study as controls. Informed consent was obtained by the patients or their parents (if the patient was aged <18 yr). The patients and controls profile at study entry is shown in Table 2
.
|
At study entry, the patients received GH replacement at a median dose of 35 µg/kg·d, following the recommendations for the pediatric age. At the restart of the treatment, according to the Consensus Conference that was recently reported (28), all GHD patients received recombinant GH at the starting dose of 810 µg/kg·d as suggested for the young adult population. After 3 months, the dose was adjusted, aiming at reaching the 50th percentile of normal serum IGF-I concentrations for sex and age, as previously reported (29, 30). At the end of the study, the median GH dose was 10 µg/kg·d in boys and 12 µg/kg·d in girls; the maximal dose was 11 µg/kg·d in boys and 15 µg/kg·d in girls.
Study protocol
At study entry, all 46 subjects underwent electrocardiogram, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate measurement, assay of serum IGF-I, total, LDL-, and HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, and fibrinogen level, and ultrasonography of the common carotid arteries. The conversion factors (mg/dl to mmol/liter) for lipids and glucose were as follows: cholesterol, 0.02586; triglycerides, 0.01129; and glucose, 0.5551. We also calculated the total/HDL-cholesterol ratio, considered as an index of severe cardiovascular risk (31), and the estimate of insulin resistance by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) score, by applying the formula of Matthews et al. (32): fasting serum insulin (µU/ml) x fasting plasma glucose (mmol/liter)/22.5. After 13 months of GH withdrawal, retesting of the GH secretory status was performed using the ARG+GHRH test as previously reported (26). According to Aimaretti et al. (23) and our previous studies (33, 34), severe GHD was defined on the basis of a GH peak less than or equal to 9 µg/liter. In GHD patients, IGF-I, total, LDL-, and HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and fibrinogen levels and ultrasonography of the common carotid arteries were repeated after 6 months of GH withdrawal and 6 months of restarting GH. In non-GHD patients, IGF-I, total, LDL-, and HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and fibrinogen levels and common carotid arteries ultrasonography were repeated after 6 and 12 months of GH withdrawal. A magnetic resonance of the sellar region was performed at study entry and then after 12 months at the end of the study in all GHD patients; no change was observed in the pituitary size.
Carotid ultrasonography
Common carotid arteries ultrasound imaging was carried out with Vingmed Sound CMF 725 equipment (Horten, Norway) by means of a 7.5-MHz annular phased array transducer; the details on the technique were reported elsewhere (20). Right and left carotid arteries were scanned longitudinally, 2.5 cm proximal and 1 cm distal to the bifurcation. When satisfactory B-mode imaging of the common carotid artery wall was achieved, M-mode images were taken for several cardiac cycles to obtain the best quality measurements of IMT. Quantitative and semiquantitative indices were evaluated by echo-Doppler ultrasonography placing the sample volume (set at 75% of lumen caliber) in the middle of the vessel lumen. The variability in the IMT measurement for our instrument was 0.03 mm. Our intra-observer variability for repeated measurements of carotid artery diameter is 0.01 ± 0.02 mm. Flow indices of both carotids were investigated by measuring blood systolic and diastolic peak velocities. The epidemiological data currently available indicate that a value of IMT at or above 1 mm at any age is associated with a significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction and/or cerebrovascular disease (35). The presence, location, and size of plaques were also evaluated at the level of the common carotid arteries. A type IV plaque featured by a thickening of the vascular wall and an increased density of all ultrasonography-detectable layers without any hemodynamic alteration was defined as a well-defined plaque (36).
Assays
Serum GH levels were measured by immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) using commercially available kits (HGH-CTK-IRMA Sorin, Saluggia, Italy). The sensitivity of the assay was 0.2 µg/liter. The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation (CV) were 4.5 and 7.9%, respectively. Plasma IGF-I was measured by IRMA after ethanol extraction. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.8 µg/liter. The normal IGF-I range in adolescent subjects (1620 yr) is 141 (3rd percentile) to 625 (97th percentile) µg/liter. The 50th percentile of IGF-I levels in our laboratory is 350 µg/liter, calculated in samples taken from 60 healthy adolescents. The intraassay CV was 3.4, 3.0, and 1.5% for the low, medium, and high points on the standard curve, respectively. The interassay CV was 8.2, 1.5, and 3.7% for the low, medium, and high points on the standard curve.
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise specified. The statistical analysis was performed by SPSS Inc. (Cary, NC) package using nonparametric tests. The comparison between patients and controls was performed by the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test; the comparison between GHD and non-GHD controls was performed by the Mann-Whitney test. The significance was set at 5%. The comparison among baseline and 6 and 12 months in the two groups of adolescents was performed by the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunns test for paired data. The significance was set at 1%.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients were classified as GHD (n = 13) or non-GHD (n = 8) based on the ARG+GHRH test performed 13 months after stopping GH replacement (Table 1
). Non-GHD did not restart GH replacement therapy. Before GH withdrawal, serum IGF-I levels were in the normal range for age in all patients (Table 1
). They were similar in non-GHD and controls (325.6 ± 33.1 µg/liter vs. 301.6 ± 35.5 µg/liter), lower in both isolated GHD and multiple GHD patients than in controls (198.4 ± 15.7 and 189.2 ± 51.3 vs. 291.0 ± 30.7 µg/liter; P < 0.001) but similar in the two GHD groups (P = 0.33). Compared with controls, before GH withdrawal, GHD adolescents had reduced HDL-cholesterol levels, and increased total/HDL-cholesterol ratio, fibrinogen, LDL-cholesterol, and glucose levels, and non-GHD adolescents had increased glucose, insulin, and HOMA. IMT at the common carotid arteries was similar in GHD and controls and was higher in non-GHD than in controls. Systolic and/or diastolic peak velocities at the common carotid arteries were higher in both GHD and non-GHD patients than in controls.
Six months after GH treatment withdrawal (Table 3
)
Serum IGF-I levels significantly decreased both in GHD (Fig. 1
) and in non-GHD adolescents (Fig. 2
). Only in GHD patients did BMI increase, and lipid profile and insulin resistance were significantly impaired. IMT at the common carotid arteries did not change in GHD patients (Figs. 1
and 3
) and significantly decreased in non-GHD patients (Fig. 2
) and became similar to controls (Fig. 3
). Systolic and diastolic peak velocities at the common carotid arteries slightly increased in GHD patients, whereas they decreased in non-GHD.
|
|
|
|
GH replacement was restarted in the 15 patients who were confirmed to have GHD. The final dose of GH replacement was similar in boys and girls (11.4 ± 2.5 vs. 13.5 ± 3.2 µg/kg·d; P = 0.28); in only one girl with hypopituitarism and receiving oral estro-progestin replacement, the maximal dose was 20 µg/kg·d, higher than that used in boys (Table 1
). Serum IGF-I levels promptly increased after GH was restarted in GHD patients (Fig. 1
). However, 6 months after GH was restarted, IGF-I levels were still subnormal in one patient with multiple GHD (no.18, Table 2
). In non-GHD adolescents, IGF-I levels did not significantly change after 6 months off of GH (Fig. 2
). Lipid profile and glucose tolerance returned to those measured at study entry in GHD patients and remained unmodified in non-GHD adolescents. However, serum IGF-I and HDL-cholesterol remained lower whereas LDL-cholesterol and total/HDL-cholesterol remained higher than in controls. In non-GHD adolescents, IMT (Fig. 3
) and systolic and diastolic peak velocities at the common carotid arteries decreased significantly when compared with baseline observations during GH treatment and approximated those of control subjects. In the GHD patients, ultrasonographic parameters did not change, except for a mild decrease in systolic peak velocity that returned to baseline values.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An unfavorable lipid profile, increased body fat with decrease of lean body mass, increased peripheral insulin resistance, decreased plasma fibrinolytic activity, abnormal cardiac structure with impaired cardiac performance, and premature atherosclerosis with increased arterial IMT are associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in adult GHD patients (6, 7). GH replacement improves left ventricular morphology and function (7), reduces IMT, and improves endothelial dysfunction (6). GH deprivation for 6 months in severe GHD adolescents (26) and 12 months in severe GHD adults further aggravates cardiac performance (30).
During childhood, reduced growth velocity is an evident clinical end-point of GHD and guides GH replacement, even if it is necessary to confirm the diagnosis by using biochemical testing. Because clear-cut clinical endpoints are lacking in adulthood, the current practice is to stop GH replacement at the final height and to reevaluate the diagnosis of GHD by appropriate GH testing: one third to one half of patients with GHD during childhood do not have persistent severe GHD in adulthood (21, 22, 23). However, discontinuation of GH therapy in adolescents with severe GHD for 612 months causes the accumulation of cardiovascular risk factors, such as the increase of total body and abdominal fat mass, decrease of lean body mass, increase of total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, lipoprotein-a, and apolipoprotein B, and decrease of HDL-cholesterol, (24, 27) and the impairment of cardiac morphology and performance (26). An impairment of the lipid profile is an early and constant finding of GHD and has been suggested as playing the main role on the coronary risk of GHD patients (37).
To give further insight on the risk of early atherosclerosis in GHD adolescents during GH replacement and withdrawal, we analyzed the classical cardiovascular risk factors and some parameters of the vascular structure and dynamics before and after GH withdrawal and after restarting GH in GHD adolescents. We also compared the results with those obtained in non-GHD adolescents undergoing the same protocol and with the results of sex-, age-, and BMI-matched healthy adolescents. Although we confirmed previous data on the worsening of the lipid profile and insulin sensitivity after GH withdrawal and its improvement after GH reinstitution, we also added some new findings in GHD adolescents. In particular, at the common carotid arteries, we found a normal vascular structure and slightly decreased systolic peak velocity after GH reinstitution. The absence of any alteration of IMT at the common carotid arteries is in agreement with previous findings by Lanes et al. (27) in another cohort of adolescents. However, it is worth noting that non-GHD adolescents showed an increased IMT and systolic and diastolic peak velocities at study entry that returned to normal after 12 months of GH withdrawal. Circulating IGF-I levels play a relevant role on endothelial properties possessing high-affinity binding sites on endothelial cells (38) and increasing nitric oxide (NO) production (39, 40). Decreased NO activity is associated with impaired arterial vasodilator capacity, increased platelet aggregability, and intimal thickening (41), linking GH and IGF-I deficiency with atherosclerosis. GHD patients had decreased NO production that improved after GH replacement (42). Excess GH and IGF-I in acromegaly is also accompanied by a slight increase of IMT (43, 44) and endothelial dysfunction (45, 46) but not, interestingly, by increase of atherosclerotic plaques (43, 47). The evidence that IMT at the common carotid arteries is significantly higher in non-GHD adolescents than in healthy sex-, age-, and BMI-matched controls, in the absence of alterations of the lipid profile, could be explained by a direct effect of a constant but slightly higher IGF-I level during GH treatment in this cohort. It should be mentioned, however, that serum IGF-I levels at study entry and during GH replacement were not different in non-GHD adolescents from those measured in controls. However, IGF-I levels decreased significantly after GH withdrawal, suggesting that they were slightly elevated during GH treatment, even in the accepted normal range for age. Whether these findings could be an expression of a future risk of atherosclerosis in the adolescents diagnosed as GHD and treated with GH during childhood, but not confirmed to maintain GHD in adulthood, cannot be ruled out by our present data.
In conclusion, GH discontinuation in severe GHD adolescents is not followed by significant alterations of the structural parameters at the common carotid arteries and by only a slight decrease of systolic peak velocity, despite alterations of the lipid profile and insulin resistance. These results suggest that increased IMT in the adult GHD population begins later in life or after a longer period of GH deprivation. Interestingly, in the adolescents not confirmed to maintain GHD, IMT at the common carotid arteries was increased during GH treatment and reversed to normal 12 months after GH withdrawal. These results strengthen the recommendation that adolescents with idiopathic GHD be retested for GHD after completion of growth as continued GH replacement in non-GHD subjects could negatively affect endothelial properties, even when IGF-I levels are maintained in the accepted normal range for sex and age. More data are required to understand whether the study of IMT at the common carotid arteries could be an additional parameter to monitor during GH replacement in GHD patients, because it seems to reflect IGF-I activity more than the simple biochemical measurement.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online February 15, 2005
Abbreviations: ARG+GHRH, Arginine plus GHRH; BMI, body mass index; CV, coefficient of variation; GHD, GH deficient; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment; IMT, intima-media thickness; IRMA, immunoradiometric assay; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.
Received September 17, 2004.
Accepted January 28, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Colao, C. Di Somma, S. Savastano, F. Rota, M. C. Savanelli, G. Aimaretti, and G. Lombardi A Reappraisal of Diagnosing GH Deficiency in Adults: Role of Gender, Age, Waist Circumference, and Body Mass Index J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2009; 94(11): 4414 - 4422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colao, C. Di Somma, S. Spiezia, S. Savastano, F. Rota, M. C. Savanelli, and G. Lombardi Growth Hormone Treatment on Atherosclerosis: Results of a 5-Year Open, Prospective, Controlled Study in Male Patients with Severe Growth Hormone Deficiency J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 3416 - 3424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colao, C. Di Somma, S. Spiezia, F. Rota, R. Pivonello, S. Savastano, and G. Lombardi The Natural History of Partial Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults: A Prospective Study on the Cardiovascular Risk and Atherosclerosis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2191 - 2200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Salerno, V. Esposito, V. Farina, G. Radetti, A. Umbaldo, D. Capalbo, L. Spinelli, S. Muzzica, G. Lombardi, and A. Colao Improvement of Cardiac Performance and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Children with GH Deficiency after Two Years of GH Replacement Therapy: An Observational, Open, Prospective, Case-Control Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1288 - 1295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colao, C. Di Somma, A. Cuocolo, L. Spinelli, W. Acampa, S. Spiezia, F. Rota, M. C. Savanelli, and G. Lombardi Does a Gender-Related Effect of Growth Hormone (GH) Replacement Exist on Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Cardiac Morphology, and Performance and Atherosclerosis? Results of a Two-Year Open, Prospective Study in Young Adult Men and Women with Severe GH Deficiency J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5146 - 5155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |