| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Neuroendocrine Unit (M.M., K.K.M., C.A., M.W., A.K.) and Eating Disorders Unit (D.B.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, and Pediatric Endocrine Unit (M.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital for Children and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Anne Klibanski, M.D., Chief, Neuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, BUL 457, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114. E-mail: aklibanski{at}partners.org.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Percent trunk fat and trunk to extremity fat ratio (T/E fat) were significantly reduced in girls with AN compared with healthy adolescents (P = 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). Percent trunk lean mass and trunk to extremity lean mass ratio (T/E lean) were higher in AN than in controls (P = 0.01 and 0.009); percent extremity lean mass was lower in AN (P = 0.009). In healthy controls, total area under the curve (AUC) for GH correlated inversely with percent trunk fat and T/E fat (r = 0.66, P = 0.002 and r = 0.62, P = 0.003). Similar correlations were observed between other measures of GH concentration (mean and nadir) and percent trunk fat and T/E fat. No relationship was observed between GH concentration and regional lean mass or between cortisol concentration and regional body composition. In contrast, GH concentration did not predict regional body composition in adolescents with AN on regression analysis. However, nadir cortisol concentration correlated inversely with percent extremity lean mass (r = 0.49; P = 0.02) and positively with percent trunk lean mass and T/E lean (r = 0.48, P = 0.03; and r = 0.49, P = 0.02) in girls with AN. A similar trend was observed between other measures of cortisol concentration (mean cortisol and AUC) and percent trunk lean mass and T/E lean in AN. Trunk fat was lowest in girls with AN who had high GH but low cortisol levels (based on median values), whereas some preservation of trunk fat was observed in girls with low GH and high cortisol levels. Weight recovery occurred in seven of 11 girls with low GH and high cortisol values; however, only two of the nine girls with high GH and low cortisol recovered weight. High GH with lower cortisol levels may thus be a marker of greater severity of AN.
Our results suggest that in healthy controls, GH concentration predicts regional body composition and favors a redistribution of body fat such that T/E fat ratio decreases. In AN, however, high levels of GH and cortisol have contrasting associations with fat mass. High cortisol levels in AN predict a redistribution of lean body mass such that extremity lean mass decreases. Further studies are necessary to better understand the implications of these data.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GH is lipolytic (4), and children and adults with GH deficiency have higher fat mass and lower lean mass than healthy controls, with a truncal fat distribution (5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Obese individuals with abdominal fat accumulation also have low GH levels (10). Administration of recombinant human GH (rhGH) reverses these effects both in conditions of GH deficiency (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11) and abdominal obesity (12, 13) and increases lean mass. AN represents the opposite end of the spectrum to obesity, and high levels of GH occur in this disorder (1, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18).
Cortisol excess has antilipolytic effects (4, 19) causing a redistribution of fat mass and favoring a truncal accumulation of fat (20, 21), which resolves with normalization of cortisol levels (22). A loss of muscle mass with hypercortisolemia has also been reported (23, 24). E2 causes a gynecoid distribution of body fat (25, 26). Estrogen deficiency, as in menopause, leads to an android redistribution of body fat (27), with increased trunk fat at the expense of extremity fat, and estrogen administration decreases android fat in postmenopausal women (28).
In this paper, we have examined regional body composition in adolescent girls with AN and in healthy adolescents of comparable maturity in relation to levels of GH, cortisol, and E2 to determine whether changes in regional body composition are commensurate with the expected effects of high GH, high cortisol, and low E2 levels on body composition.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We enrolled 23 adolescent girls with AN (meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV criteria) and 20 healthy adolescents for this study. Girls with AN did not differ from controls in chronological age (16.3 ± 1.6 vs. 15.5 ± 1.8 yr; P not significant) or bone age (15.8 ± 1.5 vs. 15.8 ± 2.0 yr; P not significant). Methods of recruitment for our subjects, clinical characteristics, hormonal data, but not regional body composition data, have been reported earlier (1). Five girls with AN and four healthy adolescents had not attained menarche at the time of the study. Other girls with AN had been amenorrheic for at least 3 months at study initiation. Healthy controls did not have a past or present history of eating disorders. The Institutional Review Board of Partners HealthCare approved the study, and informed consent and assent were obtained from all subjects and their parents.
Experimental protocol
All subjects were screened with a history, physical examination, and a blood sample to rule out thyroid dysfunction, hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, and hyperprolactinemia. Eligible subjects had frequent blood sampling every 30 min overnight (2000 h on the night of admission to 0800 h the next morning) for GH and cortisol at the General Clinical Research Center of Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA). Data obtained from frequent sampling were analyzed by the computerized algorithm Cluster (1X2) using described methods (29). Total area under the curve (AUC), nadir, and mean GH and cortisol concentrations are reported in this paper. Details of data from Cluster analysis of GH and cortisol concentration have been previously reported (1, 30). Fasting serum was obtained for IGF-I and E2. All subjects had body composition assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Subjects were followed over 1 yr, and frequent sampling for GH and cortisol was repeated at weight recovery [defined as a 10% increase in body mass index (BMI)] (2). Eleven subjects recovered weight over the study period, and frequent sampling data were available for 10 of these weight-recovered adolescents.
Anthropometric measurements
Height for all subjects was measured using a single stadiometer at the General Clinical Research Center. Measurements were obtained in triplicate and averaged. Weight was measured on an electronic scale in a hospital gown. BMI was calculated as the ratio of weight (in kilograms) to height (in meters)2. Standards of Greulich and Pyle (31) were used to determine bone age of our subjects by a single investigator, a pediatric endocrinologist.
Biochemical assessment
Serum GH concentrations and IGF-I were determined by immunoradiometric assays (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA), detection limit of 0.05 ng/ml and an intraassay coefficient of variation of 2.49.4% for GH, and detection limit of 30 µg/liter and coefficient of variation 3.14.6% for IGF-I. We measured serum cortisol with an RIA (Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA; limit of detection 1 µg/dl, sensitivity 0.21 µg/dl, coefficient of variation 2.54.1%). Although this assay measures steroid metabolites other than cortisol, it remains the standard assay for this steroid hormone. Urine free cortisol was measured by the hospital laboratory using the GammaCoat 125I RIA (Diasorin Inc., Stillwater, MN; detection limit 1 µg/dl; coefficient of variation 7%). E2 levels were assayed by ultrasensitive RIA (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc., Webster, TX; detection limit, 8.1 pmol/liter; coefficient of variation, 6.58.9%).
Body composition
Body composition, including validated measures of fat mass and lean body mass, was determined by whole-body DXA (QDR 4500, Hologic Inc., Waltham, MA) (32, 33). The precision error (SD) of DXA has been reported to be 425 g for whole-body fat and fat-free mass (32), with a correlation of 0.99 with a four-compartment model body composition method for measuring fat-free mass and 0.930.97 with multislice computed tomography for measuring regional fat-free mass (33). Whole-body DXA is recommended for determining body composition in children (34, 35), and the coefficients of variation for lean body mass and fat mass by DXA in the pediatric weight range have been reported as 1.0 and 4.1%, respectively (36, 37). Calculations for regional body composition have been previously described (3) and are summarized here: percent trunk fat, (trunk fat/total fat) x 100; percent extremity fat, (total extremity fat/total fat) x 100; trunk to extremity fat (T/E fat), percent trunk fat/percent extremity fat; percent trunk lean, (trunk lean mass/total lean mass) x 100; percent extremity lean, (total extremity lean mass/total lean mass) x 100; and trunk to extremity lean (T/E lean), percent trunk lean/percent extremity lean.
Statistical methods
All data are described as mean ± SD. The data were analyzed using the JMP program (version 4; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Students t test was used to calculate differences between means. When data were not normally distributed, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used. When comparisons involved more than two groups, ANOVA was used followed by the Tukey Kramers test for intergroup comparisons. We used paired analysis to compare endpoints at weight recovery vs. baseline. Correlational analyses were used to determine predictors of regional body composition.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical characteristics of our subjects and hormonal data have been reported in a previous study (1) and are summarized here. BMI of girls with AN was significantly lower compared with controls (16.7 ± 1.2 vs. 21.9 ± 3.7 kg/m2, P < 0.0001). Total and percent fat mass were also significantly lower in girls with AN compared with healthy adolescents (fat mass, 8.8 ± 2.7 vs. 17.4 ± 5.7 kg, P < 0.0001; percent fat mass, 18.3 ± 3.9 vs. 29.4 ± 5.4%; P < 0.0001). Lean body mass did not differ between the groups (37.0 ± 3.9 kg in AN vs. 38.8 ± 6.6 kg in controls, P not significant). Girls with AN had significantly lower IGF-I levels (315 ± 141 vs. 528 ± 157 ng/ml, P < 0.0001) and significantly higher GH concentrations compared with controls on Cluster analysis (mean GH, 5.3 ± 2.7 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4 ng/ml, P = 0.006; nadir GH, 2.3 ± 1.4 vs. 0.9 ± 0.8 ng/ml, P = 0.000; and total AUC for GH, 3879 ± 2007 vs. 2476 ± 992 ng/ml, P = 0.007). Cortisol concentrations were also significantly higher in girls with AN than in controls on Cluster analysis (mean cortisol, 8.6 ± 2.0 vs. 6.0 ± 1.1 µg/dl, P < 0.0001; nadir cortisol, 5.5 ± 2.3 vs. 3.5 ± 1.2 µg/dl, P = 0.002; and AUC for cortisol, 6112 ± 1467 vs. 4150 ± 809 µg/dl, P < 0.0001), as were values of urine free cortisol normalized for creatinine and surface area (UFC/cr.SA) (0.035 ± 0.021 vs. 0.020 ± 0.008 µg/mg·m2, P = 0.03). E2 values were lower in AN (16.7 ± 6.6 vs. 21.9 ± 9.0 pg/ml, P = 0.03).
Regional body composition
Figure 1
demonstrates differences in regional body composition between the two groups. Percent trunk fat was significantly lower in adolescents with AN compared with healthy controls (33.5 ± 3.9 vs. 38.6 ± 5.6%, P = 0.001), whereas percent extremity fat did not differ in the two groups (56.8 ± 4.0 vs. 55.9 ± 4.6%, P not significant) (Fig. 1A
), suggesting a preferential loss of truncal fat with weight loss. The T/E fat ratio was lower in AN (0.60 ± 0.10 vs. 0.70 ± 0.16, P = 0.01). Thus, girls with AN had 13.2% lower percent trunk fat and a 14.3% reduction in T/E fat compared with controls.
|
Predictors of regional fat distribution
Table 1
describes results of correlational analysis comparing measures of GH concentration with regional fat mass in girls with AN and controls. Strong inverse correlations were observed between GH concentration measures and percent trunk fat and T/E fat in controls but not in AN. A positive correlation was observed between GH concentration and percent extremity fat in controls, but no such correlation could be demonstrated in AN. However, when girls with AN were divided into two groups based on whether serum GH levels from frequent sampling were above or below the median GH value (4.45 ng/ml) for this group, we observed lower T/E fat in girls with AN whose GH levels were above the median than in those whose GH values were below the median (percent trunk fat, 31.9 ± 2.7 vs. 34.9 ± 3.2%, P = 0.05; T/E fat, 0.55 ± 0.07 vs. 0.64 ± 0.09, P = 0.03). Figure 2
demonstrates the correlation between total AUC for GH and percent trunk fat, percent extremity fat and T/E fat in girls with AN, and controls.
|
|
We then examined regional fat distribution in girls with AN who had low GH and high cortisol levels (n = 11) vs. those with high GH and low cortisol levels (n = 9) vs. controls (using median values of GH and cortisol). Three girls with AN had either high GH and high cortisol or low GH and low cortisol, and these girls were not included in this analysis. A significant difference was noted between T/E fat in the three groups, such that AN girls with high GH and low cortisol had the lowest T/E fat (Table 2
). AN girls with high cortisol and low GH had trunk fat and T/E fat that although lower did not differ significantly from controls, although BMI, fat mass, and percent fat mass were significantly lower than healthy adolescents, suggesting some preservation of trunk fat in this group, despite low weight and low overall fat mass.
|
Predictors of regional lean mass distribution
Table 3
demonstrates the correlation between measures of cortisol concentration and regional lean mass distribution in girls with AN and controls. Cortisol concentration correlated directly with T/E lean in girls with AN but not in controls. An inverse correlation was observed between nadir cortisol concentration and percent extremity lean mass in AN but not in controls. Figure 3
shows the correlations between nadir cortisol concentration and regional lean mass in girls with AN and controls. Neither percent trunk lean mass nor percent extremity lean mass correlated with GH concentration, IGF-I, or E2 (data not reported).
|
|
Effects of weight recovery
Weight recovery in 11 girls with AN resulted in a significant increase in percent trunk fat (35.7 vs. 32.2%, P = 0.0003) and T/E fat (0.63 vs. 0.57, P = 0.008). Percent extremity lean mass increased to a lesser extent (43.9 vs. 42.7%, P = 0.04), with a trend toward a decrease in the T/E lean (1.11 vs. 1.17, P = 0.06). GH nadir decreased with weight recovery (1.41 vs. 2.3 ng/dl, P = 0.06). Mean and total AUC for GH, mean cortisol, AUC, and nadir cortisol decreased minimally but not significantly with weight recovery, suggesting that a longer period of recovery may be required before significant changes are observed in these hormonal parameters. GH normalization may precede normalization of cortisol values.
Baseline cortisol AUC correlated positively with percent change in percent fat mass over 12 months in all girls with AN (r = 0.63, P = 0.01), and particularly in girls with AN who recovered weight over the follow-up period (r = 0.79, P = 0.02), such that girls with higher cortisol values at baseline had greater increases in fat mass. In addition, higher baseline cortisol AUC predicted a greater increase in percent trunk fat in these girls with AN at weight recovery (r = 0.60, P = 0.08).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GH deficiency causes an increase in fat mass and a decrease in lean mass both in children and in adults, which reverses after treatment with rhGH (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 38). These changes in body composition are a consequence of the lipolytic effects of GH (4) and a reduction of triglyceride accumulation via inhibition of lipoprotein lipase activity (39). In particular, there is a decrease in truncal fat mass with rhGH. Consistent with these effects, we observed an inverse correlation between GH concentration and trunk fat in our healthy controls, with higher levels of GH correlating with lower levels of percent trunk fat and T/E fat. In addition, GH concentrations in healthy adolescents correlated directly with percent extremity fat, suggesting that higher GH levels in adolescent girls favor a redistribution of body fat resulting in a reduction in trunk fat at the expense of extremity fat.
T/E fat was significantly lower in girls with AN compared with controls, and these adolescents also had higher GH concentrations than healthy adolescents. One may speculate that higher GH levels in AN are responsible for reduced trunk fat in this population. However, we could find no relationship between GH concentrations and percent trunk fat or T/E fat in girls with AN as a whole. One possible reason for these findings is that fat mass is decreased to such a significant extent as a consequence of undernutrition that a linear relationship can no longer be observed. When we divided girls with AN into two groups based on median GH values, girls with AN whose GH values were greater than the median value did indeed have lower T/E fat than girls whose GH values were below the median value. Also, in agreement with the fact that mature adipocytes express receptors for GH, but not for IGF-I, we found no relationship between IGF-I levels and fat distribution in either controls or in girls with AN. These data suggest that GH acts on adipocytes by direct effects and not via IGF-I.
Our subjects with AN had significantly higher cortisol concentrations than healthy adolescents of comparable maturity. High cortisol concentrations, both stress related and in Cushing syndrome, are associated with increased truncal fat (20, 21), and this effect on body composition is related to the antilipolytic action of cortisol (4). Treatment of Cushing syndrome results in a decrease in fat mass, especially truncal fat (40). Cushing syndrome is also associated with a decrease in muscle mass, and in particular extremity muscle mass, as demonstrated by a decrease in arm muscle area (23) and decreased muscle in legs and arms by DXA (24).
Our subjects with AN did not have increased fat mass or increased trunk fat, although levels of cortisol were higher than in controls. These findings are different from those in women with stress-related hypercortisolemia, who do have increased truncal fat (20). In contrast, both total and trunk fat were significantly reduced in girls with AN compared with controls. We postulate that the lack of effects of cortisol on fat distribution is related to very low levels of available substrate in AN, a condition associated with significant weight loss, whereas other conditions of stress-related hypercortisolemia are not associated with such weight loss. In addition, it is likely that expected effects of elevated cortisol levels in AN on fat distribution are offset by concomitant high GH levels in this disorder, which would cause a decrease in truncal fat. Indeed, when we divided girls with AN into two groups based on median cortisol values, girls with AN with values of cortisol above the median did have T/E fat that trended higher than girls with AN whose cortisol levels were below the median for the group. The opposing effects of high cortisol and high GH levels on fat distribution may also account for the lack of correlation between regional body composition measures and levels of these hormones in AN.
To better distinguish the opposing effects of high GH and cortisol in AN, we compared girls with AN who had high cortisol and low GH levels vs. those with high GH and low cortisol levels (based on median values for GH and cortisol). We were intrigued to note that for the most part, there was not an overlap between girls having high GH vs. high cortisol values. Girls with high cortisol and low GH levels appeared to be less severely affected with AN in that the majority (seven of 11) recovered weight within 6 months of the baseline visit, and had percent trunk fat and T/E fat that although lower did not significantly differ from controls. Conversely, girls with AN who had high GH and low cortisol levels at baseline appeared to be more severely affected in that only two of the nine girls in this category recovered weight subsequently and did so later in the course of follow-up. This group had the lowest T/E fat (significantly lower than controls). This dichotomy also explains why a correlation between cortisol or GH with regional fat measures was not noted in girls with AN.
Our data also suggest that higher cortisol levels in the presence of lower GH levels may be responsible for some preservation of body fat, particularly trunk fat, in AN, and with increasing severity of AN, increases in GH occur, causing a decrease in trunk fat.
Interestingly, in adult women with AN, weight recovery is associated with increased truncal adiposity related to cortisol levels, with greater increases in trunk fat in women with higher basal cortisol levels (41), suggesting that availability of substrate may indeed be necessary for the manifestation of antilipolytic effects of cortisol. In controls, cortisol concentrations did not predict fat distribution, likely because normocortisolemia, unlike high cortisol levels, does not have a significant effect on fat metabolism. Consistent with the data from adult studies, higher baseline cortisol predicted greater increases in fat mass and also trunk fat in weight recovered AN. These data support our supposition that lack of substrate could account for significant correlations between cortisol and regional fat mass in AN, and with increased availability of substrate, this relationship may become more evident. Of note, weight recovery did not result in marked decreases in cortisol levels, suggesting that hypercortisolemia may persist for variable periods of time even with weight recovery. Nadir GH, conversely, did decrease with weight recovery. Our data suggest that normalization of GH secretion precedes normalization of cortisol secretion during weight recovery in AN.
Lean body mass was preserved in girls with AN unlike fat mass, and inverse correlations were noted in this group between cortisol concentrations and percent extremity lean mass, consistent with the effects of high cortisol levels on muscle mass. In addition, girls with AN who had high cortisol and low GH levels had the lowest extremity lean mass and highest trunk lean mass and T/E lean ratio. Our data suggest a redistribution of lean body mass with high levels of cortisol, resulting in greater trunk than extremity lean mass compared with controls.
Conditions of hypoestrogenism, such as menopause, are associated with increased trunk fat at the expense of extremity fat (android fat distribution pattern), although total fat mass remains unchanged (27). Studies suggest an absence of estrogen receptors on adipocytes (42), and a decrease in SHBG levels with increased bioavailable testosterone has been postulated to be the mechanism responsible for these changes in regional body composition Indeed, hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women results in a reversal of these changes (28) and is associated with an increase in SHBG and a decrease in bioavailable testosterone (43). In our subjects, we could find no relationship between E2 levels and regional fat distribution. Girls with AN are hypogonadal and have low levels of estrogen (1, 2). However, levels of free testosterone are also low in this condition (2). This may explain why low levels of estrogen in girls with AN do not favor an android distribution of body fat.
Thus, we demonstrate that higher GH levels are associated with a lower T/E fat in controls but not in AN, whereas cortisol levels are associated with a redistribution of lean mass in AN but not in controls, favoring a reduction in lean mass in the extremities. Regional body composition is not predicted by estrogen or IGF-I levels. Although both GH and cortisol are elevated in AN, expected effects of these hormones on regional fat mass are not observed, possibly because of severe substrate deficiency in this disorder and because of the opposing effects of these hormones on regional fat distribution.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online February 15, 2005
Abbreviations: AN, Anorexia nervosa; AUC, area under the curve; BMI, body mass index; DXA, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry; E2, estradiol; rhGH, recombinant human GH; T/E fat, trunk to extremity fat ratio; T/E lean, trunk to extremity lean mass ratio; UFC/cr.SA, urine free cortisol normalized for creatinine and surface area.
Received October 14, 2004.
Accepted January 28, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. K Haas, M. R Kohn, S. D Clarke, J. R Allen, S. Madden, M. J Muller, and K. J Gaskin Body composition changes in female adolescents with anorexia nervosa Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2009; 89(4): 1005 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Misra, D. K Katzman, J. Cord, S. J Manning, D. Mickley, D. B Herzog, K. K Miller, and A. Klibanski Percentage extremity fat, but not percentage trunk fat, is lower in adolescent boys with anorexia nervosa than in healthy adolescents Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2008; 88(6): 1478 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Misra, D. K. Katzman, J. Cord, S. J. Manning, N. Mendes, D. B. Herzog, K. K. Miller, and A. Klibanski Bone Metabolism in Adolescent Boys with Anorexia Nervosa J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 3029 - 3036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Misra, M. A. Bredella, P. Tsai, N. Mendes, K. K. Miller, and A. Klibanski Lower growth hormone and higher cortisol are associated with greater visceral adiposity, intramyocellular lipids, and insulin resistance in overweight girls Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2008; 295(2): E385 - E392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. G. De Alvaro, M. T. Munoz-Calvo, V. Barrios, G. Martinez, G. A. Martos-Moreno, F. Hawkins, and J. Argente Regional fat distribution in adolescents with anorexia nervosa: effect of duration of malnutrition and weight recovery Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 157(4): 473 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Puder, S. Varga, M. Kraenzlin, C. De Geyter, U. Keller, and B. Muller Central Fat Excess in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Relation to Low-Grade Inflammation and Insulin Resistance J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 6014 - 6021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |