help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2004-1838
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Besson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mullis, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Besson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mullis, P. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Pediatric Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 5 2493-2499
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

Short Stature Caused by a Biologically Inactive Mutant Growth Hormone (GH-C53S)

Amélie Besson, Souzan Salemi, Johnny Deladoëy, Jean-Marc Vuissoz, Andrée Eblé, Martin Bidlingmaier, Sibylle Bürgi, Ulrich Honegger, Christa Flück and Primus E. Mullis

University Children’s Hospital (A.B., S.S., J.D., J.-M.V., A.E., C.F., P.E.M.), Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, Inselspital, and Department of Pharmacology (S.B., U.H.), University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland; and Medizinische Klinik-Innenstadt (M.B.), Munich University, D-80336 Munich, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Professor Dr. Primus E. Mullis, University Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Endocrinology, Inselspital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland. E-mail: primus.mullis{at}insel.ch.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Human GH has two disulfide bridges linking Cys-53 to Cys-165 and Cys-182 to Cys-189. Although absence of the first disulfide bridge has been shown to affect the bioactivity of GH in transgenic mice, little is known of the importance of this bridge in mediating the GH/GH-receptor (GHR) interaction in humans. However, we have identified a missense mutation (G705C) in the GH1 gene of a Serbian patient. This mutation was found in the homozygous state and leads to the absence of the disulfide bridge Cys-53 to Cys-165. To study the impact of this mutation in vitro, GHR binding and Janus kinase (Jak)2/signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat)5 activation experiments were performed, in which it was observed that at physiological concentrations (3–50 ng/ml) both GHR binding and Jak2/Stat5 signaling pathway activation were significantly reduced in the mutant GH-C53S, compared with wild-type (wt)-GH. Higher concentrations (400 ng/ml) were required for this mutant to elicit responses similar to wt-GH. These results demonstrate that the absence of the disulfide bridge Cys-53 to Cys-165 affects the binding affinity of GH for the GHR and subsequently the potency of GH to activate the Jak2/Stat5 signaling pathway. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that GH-C53S is a bioinactive GH at the physiological range and that the disulfide bridge Cys-53 to Cys-163 is required for mediating the biological effects of GH.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
SHORT STATURE ASSOCIATED with bioinactive GH was first suggested and described by Kowarski et al. in 1978 (1). It is clinically characterized by normal or slightly increased GH secretion, pathologically low IGF-I levels, and normal catch-up growth on GH-replacement therapy. On a clinical basis, additional cases of bioinactive GH were described in the 1980s (2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Takahashi and coworkers (7, 8) reported two missense mutations (R77C and D112G) in the GH1 gene leading to Kowarski’s syndrome in two Japanese patients. However, these mutations were both found in the heterozygous state only, and furthermore, the mutation R77C was also identified in the normal-stature father. Six GH variants were then suggested to be bioinactive by Millar and coworkers (9). Again, all these mutations were found in the heterozygous state, and no clear correlation between laboratory/clinical phenotype and patient genotype was shown.

GH plays a major role in postnatal growth. The growth-promoting effects of GH are achieved through GH’s diverse and pleiotropic effects on cellular metabolism and differentiation and are mediated through the activation of a cell surface receptor (GHR). A single GH molecule contains two GHR-binding sites, and these bind two GHR molecules sequentially, inducing receptor dimerization and hence activation (10). Interaction of the dimerized GHR with the intracellular tyrosine kinase Janus kinase (Jak)2 leads to phosphorylation of downstream signal transduction molecules, including signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat)5 (11). Activated Stat5 is translocated in the nucleus in which it transactivates a series of GH-responsive genes (11).

Structurally human (h) GH comprises four antiparallel {alpha}-helices separated by connecting loops as well as four Cys residues located at position 53, 165, 182, and 189 (12). When aligned to optimize amino acid similarity, the four Cys residues were found to be conserved among GH molecules from different vertebrates (13, 14). This conservation may indicate that these residues are important for structural integrity and biological activity of the protein (15). The four Cys residues form two disulfide bridges: one between Cys-53 and Cys-165, which results in a large loop, and the other one between Cys-182 and Cys-189, which forms a small loop. Previous studies have shown that the integrity of the small loop of hGH (Cys-182 to Cys-189) is nonessential for the secretion (16) and the biological activity of GH (17, 18). A drastic reduction of GH secretion was, however, observed when the disulfide bridge Cys-53 to Cys-165 was disrupted (16). Site-directed mutagenesis techniques have been used to perform Cys residue conversion experiments. When the disulfide bonds in bovine (b) GH were disrupted by amino acid substitution of Cys to Ser residues and assayed for their ability to enhance growth in transgenic mice, only animals that expressed bGH analogs with the large loop intact demonstrated a growth-enhanced phenotype (16). Activity of GH having lost its disulfide bond Cys-53 to Cys-165 was also studied by Uchida et al. (19) using the adipose conversion assay. The GH variant without the disulfide bridge Cys-53 to Cys-165 showed lower activity than the normal GH. Its binding capacity was also reduced (19). Furthermore, a loss of biological activity of hGH and porcine GH was observed when both disulfide bridges were disrupted (20, 21), even though these results were controversial (22, 23).

In this report, we describe the first patient with short stature carrying this GH-C53S mutation. This mutation was found in a homozygous state, which is in contrast to the patients described so far (7, 8, 9). Furthermore, the parents of this patient, presenting in a heterozygous state, were of normal height. Clinical data of the patient are presented. Furthermore, in vitro studies, and more precisely GHR binding experiments and activation of Jak2/Stat5 signaling pathway experiments, were performed to study the impact of this mutation on bioactivity.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

Family. We studied a family of five members from Serbia: two parents and three offspring. The pedigree is shown in Fig. 1Go. The parents are first cousins in good health and with height and weight within normal limits (24). The father is 171 cm [–0.9 SD score (SDS) for age and sex (24)], and the mother is 163 cm (–0.1 SDS). The only sister tested negative for the mutation [wt (wild-type)/wt) and was 164.2 cm (0.0 SDS) at the age of 18 yr when they left Switzerland for Serbia.



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Pedigree of the patient’s family. The distribution of the GH-C53S mutation is shown. The open symbol represents wild-type, whereas the solid symbol represents homozygosity for the mutation. The open symbols containing smaller solid symbol represent heterozygosity.

 
Patient

The boy was born at term (38 wk 2 d of pregnancy) after a normal pregnancy. The delivery and post- and perinatal course were uncomplicated. The patient’s birth weight and length were 2810 g (–1 SDS) and 46 cm (–1.8 SDS), respectively (24). Growth retardation became obvious at the age of 3.5 yr, at which stage a local doctor followed the progress of the boy. The psychomotor development was reported normally. At the age of 8 yr, the patient immigrated to Switzerland with his family. Thereafter, at the age of 9 yr, he was referred to the Outpatient Clinic of the University Children’s Hospital in Bern, Switzerland. At this time he presented with short stature (–3.6 SDS for age and sex) (Fig. 2Go) (24). At the beginning the possibility of GH insensitivity syndrome was suggested: rather high basal GH concentration, high peak GH level after provocation test, low basal IGF-I concentration, although unexplained concentrations of IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 in the lower normal range (P10) and normal GH binding protein (GHBP) levels were found (Table 1Go). Further detailed assessment, however, presented a normal IGF-I and IGFBP-3 response after an IGF-I generation test (Table 1Go) (25), and together with the normal sequence of the GHR-gene, a functionally altered GH was hypothesized. In addition, the other pituitary-derived hormonal axes were studied in detail and were normal. Furthermore, renal, intestinal, or metabolic reasons for failure to thrive were excluded. A magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the head, especially the region of hypothalamus and pituitary gland, showed no abnormalities. Subsequently recombinant human (rh)GH-replacement therapy (Norditropin, at a dose of 30 µg/kg; Novo-Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark) was administered sc in the evening on a daily basis. The treatment resulted in growth velocity increase to 9.6 cm (+8.4 SDS) during the first year (pretreatment growth velocity, 3.9 cm; –2.9 SDS). Thereafter, the doses were continuously adapted (30–45 µg/kg·d) at a regular basis according to the effect on growth velocity and IGF-I measurements. When the boy left Switzerland with his family, he was 16 yr 4 months of age, his height was 164 cm (–1.6 SDS), his weight 50 kg (–1.5 SDS), and the pubertal stages according to Tanner were P5 and G5 with testicular volumes of 16 ml (left) and 18 ml (right) (24, 26). He was in good health and finished school with good academic results.



View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Growth chart of the patient. Percentiles are shown on the extreme right. The solid circles indicate the height measurements, the open circles the bone ages. The arrow pointing down marks the beginning of rhGH therapy, whereas the arrow pointing up the end of the therapy (the time the patient left Switzerland). Asterisk indicates start of puberty (both testicles 4 ml).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Clinical and laboratory findings before and on rhGH replacement therapy

 
Radiographs of the left hand and wrist were taken for assessment of skeletal age according to Greulich and Pyle (27) (Fig. 2Go). Serum GH was measured by the DSL-GH ELISA kit [Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (DSL), Webster, TX]; IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements were preformed using the IGF-I immunoradiometric assay (radioisotopic assay kit; Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA) and the IGFBP-3 RIA kit (Nichols Institute Diagnostics), respectively. Serum GHBP was determined by a ligand-mediated immunofunctional assay (28).

The Ethical Committee of the University Children’s Hospital approved the experimental protocol. Informed consent was obtained from parents as well as family members involved.

Production of GH peptides

The plasmid pcDNA3.1(–) containing hGH cDNA (29) was used as a template to amplify the hGH cDNA and inserted in the pSecTag2 plasmid (Invitrogen AG, Basel, Switzerland).

Site-directed mutagenesis was performed on pSecGHwt to generate the GH mutant studied (GH-C53S) using the QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene AG, Basel, Switzerland). Mutagenesis was confirmed by sequencing (Fig. 3Go) (Big Dye Terminator sequencing kit; PerkinElmer, Applied Biosystems, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Products were analyzed on an ABI 373 automated DNA sequencing system (Applied Biosystem) and sequences confirmed using GenBank accession no. NM_000515 as reference sequence.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Part of the sequences showing the substitution of the cysteine at amino acid 53 with serine.

 
To produce the GH variants, wt-GH and GH-C53S, stable clones were generated in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1) by transfection with FuGene 6 (Roche Diagnostics AG, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Selection was made with Hygromycin (750 µg/ml, Roche Diagnostics AG, Rotkreuz, Switzerland).

The concentrations of the GH produced by the CHO cells during 3 d in Ham’s F12 plus 2% fetal calf serum media were measured by the DSL-GH ELISA kit (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories). To confirm that the mutation C53S does not affect the affinity of the antibody used in the DSL-ELISA, two different GH assays were performed on two samples of CHO supernatant, and the results were compared.

Measurements of GH

Human GH immunochemiluminometric assay (ICMA). Serum concentrations of various forms of hGH were measured using automated Advantage chemiluminescent assay system (Nichols Diagnostics Institute, Bad Vilbel, Germany). This sandwich-type immunoassay involves a monoclonal capture and a polyclonal detection antibody. Within-assay coefficient of variance was 3.5, 2.2, and 2.9% at concentrations of 1.4, 10.5, and 28 ng/ml, respectively. Between-assay variability at the same concentrations was 7.9, 2.7, and 5.9%, respectively. The lower limit of quantification was 0.2 ng/ml and the linear working range between 0.2 and 50 ng/ml.

DSL-GH ELISA. The DSL-10–1900 active hGH ELISA is an enzymatically amplified two-step sandwich-type immunoassay (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories). Intraassay CV was 4.1, 4.0, and 3.2% at concentrations of 0.9, 3.5, and 20.3 ng/ml, respectively. Interassay CV was 6.1, 6.5, and 6.8% at the same concentrations. The lower limit of detection was 0.1 ng/ml and the linear working range between 0.1 and 36 ng/ml.

Immunofunctional assay (IFA). This assay has been previously described by Strasburger et al. (30).

Receptor binding assay

Receptor binding assays were performed using 293 human embryonic kidney cells stably expressing human GHR (293GHR) (31, 32, 33). 293GHR cells were a gift from Professor R. Ross (Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK) and were cultivated as described by Ross et al. (33). Twenty-four hours after plating 293GHR cells in 12-well plates (1.5 x 105 cells/well), cells were serum starved for 12 h. Cells were then incubated with 125I-hGH (PerkinElmer, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland, 200,000 cpm/well) for 3 h at room temperature in starvation media in the absence (negative control) or presence of various concentrations of unlabeled GH peptides produced by the CHO cells (wt-GH and GH-C53S) as well as rhGH (positive control). The cells were then washed with PBS buffer and solubilized in 1 ml of 1 M NaOH for counting radioactivity with a {gamma}-counter (1470 Wizard, Wallac, PerkinElmer, Hünenberg, Switzerland). Experiments (n ≥ 3) were performed in triplicate wells. IC50 values for the different GH peptides were determined by nonlinear regression, using a single-site competition model (version 2.0 Prism software, GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA).

Luciferase reporter gene assay of Stat5 activation

293GHR cells were used to assay Stat5 activation as described before (32, 33). Briefly, cells were transfected with a Stat5-responsive luciferase reporter gene construct (34, 35) and treated with increasing amounts of GH (rhGH, wt-GH, and GH-C53S) for 6 h. Luciferase expression was then measured with a luminometer (Mediators PhL; Aureon Biosystems, Vienna, Austria). EC50 values were obtained from sigmoidal dose-response curves generated using GraphPad Prism software.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using ANOVA (one-way ANOVA) and Dunnett’s posttest.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Clinical diagnosis and follow-up on rhGH

One patient originally from Serbia presented with severe short stature (Fig. 2Go). Sequencing of the GH1 gene revealed a mutation leading to the substitution of the cysteine at amino acid 53 with serine (Fig. 3Go). This mutation causes the disruption of the disulfide bridge linking Cys-53 to Cys-165. The distribution of this mutation in the family is shown in Fig. 1Go. Both parents and the brother are heterozygous for the mutation. The sister does not carry the mutation, whereas the patient is homozygous for the mutation. Clinical assessment (Table 1Go), a normal GHR sequence, and the fact that rhGH-replacement therapy restored normal growth rate in the patient, excluded a GHR defect or an IGF-I defect but indicated the presence of a bioinactive GH. Before treatment, the secretion of GH in the patient was normal to slightly increased. Functional significance of the lesion was then explored with in vitro studies including binding and signaling experiments.

Functional characterization of the C53S variant

To functionally characterize the GH missense variant C53S, site-directed mutagenesis was performed on the plasmid pSecGHwt, before expression in CHO-K1 cells. The concentration of GH in the supernatant of the CHO cells was measured by three different GH assays. This was done to exclude the possibility that the mutation altered antibody binding affinity and subsequent determination of GH concentration (Table 2Go). The DSL and the ICMA assays are both conventional ELISAs functioning with antibodies against GH. The IFA has been developed by Strasburger et al. (30) and for detection uses labeled GHBP, which binds to binding site 1 of the human GH. The ratios from both conventional ELISAs (ICMA/DSL) were the same for both wt-GH and GH-C53S. Using the IFA, GH-C53S was almost undetectable as will be discussed further down. Nevertheless, the ratios IFA to DSL and IFA to ICMA were comparable.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. GH concentrations from both GH variants measured by three different GH assays

 
Receptor binding studies were performed to determine the affinity of wt-GH, rhGH, and the variant GH-C53S for the GHR (Fig. 4AGo). The IC50 values for wt-GH, rhGH, and GH-C53S were found to be 21.2, 12.2, and 72.4 ng/ml, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the IC50 values from wt-GH and rhGH, but significant difference was observed between the IC50 values from wt-GH and GH-C53S (ANOVA, P < 0.05). Comparing these data with the almost undetectable binding of the GH-C53S in the IFA, it looks like GH-C53S did not bind to the GHBP at all, whereas in the binding experiments, this mutant would bind to the GHR. In the IFA, however, as already stated, the first step is the binding of GH to an antibody against binding site 2. And only the second step is the binding to GHBP involving binding site 1. Therefore, in these two settings, different aspects are tested, and in the IFA, the binding as such to the binding sites rather than the effect on displacement is assessed, which may explain the different results obtained (Table 2Go and Fig. 4AGo).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. A, Competitive displacement of 125I-GH binding to the GHR by rhGH (positive control), wt-GH, and GH-C53S. Results are normalized to the amount of 125I-GH bound in the absence of any unlabeled GH. Each point is the mean of three separate experiments performed in triplicate. Bars, ± 1 SD. B, Jak2/Stat5 signaling capacity of rhGH, wt-GH, and GH-C53S. Results are expressed as x-fold induction relative to the basic activity of unstimulated cells and represent the means ± 1 SD of three separate experiments performed in duplicate.

 
Furthermore, a Stat5-responsive luciferase reporter gene assay system (32, 33) was used to assay signal transduction activity of the GH-C53S variant. Importantly, the assay of GH biological activity used requires all stages of the Jak2/Stat5 signaling pathway to be functional. The GH-C53S variant was found to display reduced ability to activate the Jak2/Stat5 pathway when compared with wt-GH (Fig. 4BGo). The EC50 values of wt-GH, rhGH, and GH-C53S were 44.4, 31.4, and 111.1 ng/ml, respectively. As for the binding experiments, no significant difference was observed between the EC50 values of wt-GH and rhGH, but a significant difference was observed between the EC50 values of wt-GH and GH-C53S (ANOVA, P < 0.01).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this report we describe a patient suffering from bioinactive GH due to a mutation that abolishes the disulfide bridge Cys-53 to Cys-165. The patient affected by this mutation showed typical clinical characteristics of GH deficiency and further assessment revealed the presence of bioinactive GH. The patient displayed no alteration in GH secretion, having normal to slightly increased GH concentrations in circulation. Although impaired secretion has been reported in mice L-cells transfected with either bGH-C53S or bGH-C164S (bovine Cys-164 corresponding to human Cys-165) in vitro, no secretion problems were observed in vivo (16). Indeed, Chen et al. (16) established a mouse line expressing bGH-C53S and observed that this GH variant was found in the sera of these mice at levels comparable with those in transgenic mice expressing bGH-wt. The different secretion patterns of GH-C53S observed in vivo and in vitro may be explained by the fact that in vivo a low concentration of IGF-I in circulation may stimulate the production and secretion of GH, as it is also observed in Laron’s syndrome (36, 37). Eventually, GH-replacement therapy in the patient restored normal growth and height. This study examined the phenotypic significance of this new mutation through binding and functional assays.

Evolutionary conserved data (13, 38) as well as molecular modeling have confirmed the importance of both disulfide bridges for GH protein stability. However, only the disulfide bond between Cys-53 and Cys-165 is essential for the interaction of this hormone with the GHR (16, 17, 18, 19). Indeed, three discontinuous segments have been shown to be crucial for the GH/GHR interaction: the NH2 terminus of helix I, the loop from Cys53 to the start of helix II (amino acid 54 to 74), and the COOH-terminal portion of helix IV (38). Although the disruption of the disulfide bridge between Cys-53 and Cys-165 may not induce any change in the four-helice bundle structure of hGH (Fig. 5Go), the mutation causes the rigid association between the loop from helix I and II and the helix IV to become loose. Uchida et al. (19) hypothesized that this may alter the spatial arrangement of the three discontinuous segments, resulting in reduced binding affinity and subsequent biological activity. Our in vitro studies confirm this hypothesis. Indeed, the GH-C53S concentration was almost undetectable with the IFA, implying that this variant did not bind to the GHBP used for detection in this assay. In this assay GHBP binds to binding site 1 of hGH. The fact that GH-C53S could not be detected in the IFA indicates that the binding site 1 of this variant is affected and does not allow this variant to have proper binding. The other assays, DSL and ICMA, showed the same ratio for both GH variants, indicating that the mutation C53S does not affect the affinity for the antibody used in these two conventional ELISAs. Thereafter, for quantification, hGH-DSL was the ELISA used for the rest of the study. In the GHR binding experiments and the physiological range, GH-C53S showed a significantly lower binding affinity for the GHR than wt-GH, whereas at high, supraphysiological concentrations (>400 ng/ml), GH-C53S reached the same binding efficacy as wt-GH. However, these high concentrations are not physiologically relevant. Being in line with the results obtained from the binding studies, GH-C53S showed a lower capacity to activate the Stat5 pathway in the physiological concentrations, but at supraphysiologically high concentrations, that variant again showed responses comparable with wt-GH.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Three-dimensional model of hGH performed with the PyMOL molecular graphics system (2002; http://pymol.sourceforge.net). The four {alpha}-helices are shown, numbered I-IV. The four cysteines are shown with the disulfide bonds they form.

 
In the experiments by Chen et al. (16), the weight gain between nontransgenic mice and the lines of transgenic mice expressing bGH-wt or bGH-C53S were compared. The mice expressing bGH-wt grew significantly more than the other two, demonstrating a growth-enhanced phenotype, according to the expected GH-dose effect. The weight gain of the nontransgenic mice, however, and those expressing bGH-C53S were comparable. These experiments, therefore, confirm the bioinactivity of the mutant GH-C53S in vivo, with the still normal endogenous wt-GH available in the circulation being responsible for their adequate growth. As such, the results indicate that GH-C53S is bioinactive in physiological conditions and acts as a Kowarski’s mutation (1).

The data also show that GH-C53S is recognized by the GHR and exhibits partial activity (supraphysiological concentrations). In this way, the disulfide bridge between Cys-53 and Cys-165 may not be essential but necessary to express full biological activity for the Jak2/Stat5 signaling pathway. Other pathways have been implicated in GH actions, but the Jak2/Stat5 pathway is currently thought to be the most important pathway attributed to the growth-promoting effects of GH (39). Lewis et al. (40) described a new mutation affecting the ERK pathway of GH but not the Jak2/Stat5 pathway. However, no connection could be presented with the phenotype of the patient described.

In conclusion, we described a homozygous missense mutation, C53S, in the GH molecule of one Serbian patient with growth retardation showing all the clinical characteristics of a bioinactive GH. The bioinactivity of this mutant has been confirmed on a molecular and cellular basis and is due to lower affinity of the C53S variant for the GHR, presumably caused by the disruption of the disulfide bond between Cys-53 and Cys-165. Therefore, this research contributes new evidence for the importance of these conserved cysteines in mediating the biological effects of this hormone.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Professor Richard J. M. Ross and Dr. Mabrouka Maamra (Sheffield, UK) for their help. We are also very grateful to Chris Towne (Lausanne, Switzerland) for reviewing and discussing the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Grant 3200-064623.01 from the Swiss National Science Foundation (to P.E.M.).

First Published Online February 15, 2005

Abbreviations: b, Bovine; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; DSL, Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (assay); GHBP, GH binding protein; GHR, GH-receptor; 293GHR, 293 human embryonic kidney cells stably expressing human GHR; h, human; ICMA, immunochemiluminometric assay; IFA, immunofunctional assay; IGFBP, IGF binding protein; Jak, Janus kinase; rh, recombinant human; SDS, SD score; Stat, signal transducer and activator of transcription; wt, wild type.

Received September 16, 2004.

Accepted February 3, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kowarski AA, Schneider J, Ben-Galim E, Weldon VV, Daughaday WH 1978 Growth failure with normal serum RIA-GH and low somatomedin activity: somatomedin restoration and growth acceleration after exogenous GH. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:461–464
  2. Hayek A, Peake GH 1978 A new syndrome of short stature due to biologically inactive but immunoreactive growth hormone. Pediatr Res 12:413
  3. Rudman D, Kutner MH, Blackston RD, Cushman RA, Bain RP, Patterson JH 1981 Children with normal-variant short-stature: treatment with human growth hormone for six months. N Engl J Med 305:123–131[Abstract]
  4. Frazer TE, Gavin JR, Daughaday WH, Hillman RE, Weldon VV 1982 Growth hormone dependent growth failure. J Pediatr 101:12–15[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Plotnick LP, Van Meter QL, Kowarski AA 1983 Human growth hormone treatment of children with growth failure and normal growth hormone levels by immunoassay: lack of correlation with somatomedin generation. Pediatrics 71:324–327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bright GM, Rogol AD, Johanson AJ, Blizzard RM 1983 Short stature associated with normal growth hormone and decreased somatomedin-C concentrations: response to exogenous growth hormone. Pediatrics 71:576–580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Takahashi Y, Shirono H, Arisaka O, Takahashi K, Yagi T, Koga J, Kaji H, Okimura Y, Abe H, Tanaka T, Chihara K 1997 Biologically inactive growth hormone caused by an amino acid substitution. J Clin Invest 100:1159–1165[Medline]
  8. Chihara K, Takahashi K, Kaji H, Goji K, Okimura Y, Abe H 1998 Short stature caused by natural growth hormone antagonist. Horm Res 49:41–45
  9. Millar DS, Lewis MD, Horan M, Newsway V, Easter TE, Gregory JW, Fryklund L, Norin M, Crowne EC, Davies SJ, Edwards P, Kirk J, Waldron K, Smith PJ, Phillips III JA, Scanlon MF, Krawczak M, Cooper DN, Procter AM 2003 Novel mutations of the growth hormone 1 (GH1) gene disclosed by modulation of the clinical selection criteria for individuals with short stature. Hum Mutat 21:424–440[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Wells JA 1996 Binding in the growth hormone receptor complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:1–6[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Herrington J, Carter-Su C 2001 Signaling pathways activated by the growth hormone receptor. Trends Endocrinol Metab 12:252–257[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. De Vos AM, Ultsch M, Kossiakoff AA 1992 Human growth hormone and extracellular domain of its receptor: crystal structure of the complex. Science 255:306–312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Watahiki M, Yamamoto M, Yamakawa M, Tanaka T, Nakashima K 1989 Conserved and unique amino acid residues in the domains of the growth hormones. J Biol Chem 264:312–316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Nicoll CS, Mayer GL, Russell SM 1986 Structural features of prolactins and growth hormones that can be related to their biological properties. Endocr Rev 7:169–203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kopchick JJ 2001 Growth and maturation. In: Melmed S, ed. Endocrinology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.; 389–404
  16. Chen XZ, Shafer AW, Yun JS, Li YS, Wagner TE, Kopchick JJ 1992 Conversion of bovine growth hormone cysteine residues to serine affects secretion by cultured cells and growth rates in transgenic mice. Mol Endocrinol 6:598–606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Graf L, Borvendeg J, Barat E, Hermann I, Patthy A 1976 Reactivity and biological importance of the disulfide bonds in human growth hormone. FEBS Lett 66:233–237[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Graf L, Li CH, Bewley TA 1975 Selective reduction and alkylation of the COOH-terminal disulfide bridge in bovine growth hormone. Int J Pept Protein Res 7:467–473[Medline]
  19. Uchida E, Uemura H, Tanaka T, Nishikawa S, Uesugi S, Tanaka A, Morikawa M, Hayakawa T, Ikehara M 1991 Activity of artificial mutant variants of human growth hormone deficient in a disulfide bond between Cys 53 and Cys 165. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 39:150–153[Medline]
  20. Necessary PC, Andersen TT, Ebner KE 1985 Activity of alkylated prolactin and human growth hormone in receptor and cell assays. Mol Cell Endocrinol 39:247–254[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Nutting DF, Kostyo JL, Mills JB, Wilhelmi AE 1970 A cyanogen bromide fragment of reduced and S-aminoethylated porcine growth hormone with anabolic activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 200:601–614[Medline]
  22. Dixon JS, Li CH 1966 Retention of the biological potency of human pituitary growth hormone after reduction and carbamidomethylation. Science 154:785–786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Campbell RM, Kostyo JL, Scanes CG 1990 Lipolytic and antilipolytic effects of human growth hormone, its 20-kilodalton variant, a reduced and carboxymethylated derivative, and human placental lactogen on chicken adipose tissue in vitro. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 193:269–273[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Prader A, Largo RH, Molinari L, Issler C 1989 Physical growth of Swiss children from birth to 20 years of age. Helv Paediatr Acta 52(Suppl):1–125
  25. Buckway CK, Guevara-Aguirre J, Pratt KL, Burren CP, Rosenfeld RG 2001 The IGF-I generation test revisited: a marker of GH sensitivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5176–5183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Marshall WA, Tanner JM 1970 Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Arch Dis Child 45:15–23
  27. Greulich WW, Pyle SI 1959 Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
  28. Carlsson LM, Rosberg S, Vitangcol RV, Wong WL, Albertsson-Wikland K 1993 Analysis of 24-hour plasma profiles of growth hormone (GH)-binding protein, GH/GH-binding complex, and GH in healthy children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:356–361[Abstract]
  29. Deladoëy J, Stocker P, Mullis PE 2001 Autosomal dominant GH deficiency due to an Arg183His GH-1 gene mutation: clinical and molecular evidence of impaired regulated GH secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3941–3947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Strasburger CJ, Wu Z, Pflaum C-D, Dressendörfer RA 1996 Immunofunctional assay of human growth hormone (hGH) in serum: a possible consensus for quantitative hGH measurement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:2613–2620[Abstract]
  31. Maamra M, Finidori J, von Laue S, Simon S, Justice S, Webster J, Dower S, Ross RJ 1999 Studies with a growth hormone antagonist and dual-fluorescent confocal microscopy demonstrate that the full-length human growth hormone receptor, but not the truncated isoform, is very rapidly internalized independent of Jak2-Stat5 signaling. J Biol Chem 274:14791–14798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Von Laue S, Finidori J, Maamra M, Shen XY, Justice S, Dobson PR, Ross RJ 2000 Stimulation of endogenous GH and interleukin-6 receptors selectively activates different Jaks and Stats, with a Stat5 specific synergistic effect of dexamethasone. J Endocrinol 165:301–311[Abstract]
  33. Ross RJ, Esposito N, Shen XY, von Laue S, Chew SL, Dobson PR, Postel-Vinay MC, Finidori J 1997 A short isoform of the human growth hormone receptor functions as a dominant negative inhibitor of the full-length receptor and generates large amounts of binding protein. Mol Endocrinol 11:265–273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Sotiropoulos A, Moutoussamy S, Renaudie F, Clauss M, Kayser C, Gouilleux F, Kelly PA, Finidori J 1996 Differential activation of Stat3 and Stat5 by distinct regions of the growth hormone receptor. Mol Endocrinol 10:998–1009[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Moutoussamy S, Kelly PA, Finidori J 1998 Growth-hormone-receptor and cytokine-receptor-family signaling. Eur J. Biochem 255:1–11[CrossRef]
  36. Daughaday WH, Laron Z, Pertzelan A, Heins JN 1969 Defective sulfation factor generation: a possible etiological link in dwarfism. Trans Assoc Am Physicians 82:129–138[Medline]
  37. Laron Z, Pertzelan A, Karp M, Kowaldo-Silbergeld A, Daughaday WH 1971 Administration of growth hormone to patients with familial dwarfism with high plasma immunoreactive growth hormone. Measurement of sulfation factor, metabolic, and linear growth responses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 33:332–342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Cunningham BC, Wells JA 1989 High-resolution epitope mapping of hGH-receptor interactions by alanine-scanning mutagenesis. Science 244:1081–1085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Rosenfeld RG, Hwa V 2004 Toward a molecular basis for idiopathic short stature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:1066–1067[Free Full Text]
  40. Lewis MD, Horan M, Millar DS, Newsway V, Easter TE, Fryklund L, Gregory JW, Norin M, Del Valle C-J, Lopez-Siguero JP, Canete R, Lopez-Canti LF, Diaz-Torrado N, Espino R, Ulied A, Scanlon MF, Procter AM, Cooper DN 2004 A novel dysfunctional growth hormone variant (Ile179Met) exhibits a decreased ability to activate the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:1068–1075[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S. Dateki, K. Hizukuri, T. Tanaka, N. Katsumata, P. Katavetin, and T. Ogata
An immunologically anomalous but considerably bioactive GH produced by a novel GH1 mutation (p.D116E)
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2009; 161(2): 301 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Petkovic, D. Lochmatter, J. Turton, P. E. Clayton, P. J. Trainer, M. T. Dattani, A. Eble, I. C. Robinson, C. E. Fluck, and P. E. Mullis
Exon Splice Enhancer Mutation (GH-E32A) Causes Autosomal Dominant Growth Hormone Deficiency
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4427 - 4435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. Hess, Y. Hujeirat, M. P. Wajnrajch, S. Allon-Shalev, Z. Zadik, I. Lavi, and Y. Tenenbaum-Rakover
Variable Phenotypes in Familial Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency Caused by a G6664A Mutation in the GH-1 Gene
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4387 - 4393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Petkovic, A. Besson, M. Thevis, D. Lochmatter, A. Eble, C. E. Fluck, and P. E. Mullis
Evaluation of the Biological Activity of a Growth Hormone (GH) Mutant (R77C) and Its Impact on GH Responsiveness and Stature
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8): 2893 - 2901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
V. Petkovic, M. Thevis, D. Lochmatter, A. Besson, A. Eble, C. E Fluck, and P. E Mullis
GH mutant (R77C) in a pedigree presenting with the delay of growth and pubertal development: structural analysis of the mutant and evaluation of the biological activity
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2007; 157(suppl_1): S67 - S74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S. Salemi, S. Yousefi, K. Baltensperger, I. C A F Robinson, A. Eble, D. Simon, P. Czernichow, G. Binder, E. Sonnet, and P. E Mullis
Variability of isolated autosomal dominant GH deficiency (IGHD II): impact of the P89L GH mutation on clinical follow-up and GH secretion
Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 153(6): 791 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Besson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mullis, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Besson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mullis, P. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Pediatric Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals