| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
EXTENSIVE CLINICAL EXPERIENCE |
Department of Endocrinology, South Infirmary-Victoria Hospital, Cork, Republic of Ireland
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. C. H. Walsh, Department of Endocrinology, South Infirmary-Victoria Hospital, Old Blackrock Road, Cork, Republic of Ireland. E-mail: info{at}sivh.com.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
It is increasingly recognized that the clinical presentation of HH has changed significantly in recent years, and that many of the recognized complications are encountered less frequently (10). However, there has been no recent detailed study of hypogonadism in HH; therefore, it is not clear whether he prevalence of this complication has also declined. We now present the results of a detailed study of pituitary-gonadal function undertaken in a large group of unselected patients with HH, all of whom were followed by a single physician in a single center.
|
Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
HH was diagnosed by standard criteria. All patients had biochemical evidence of iron overload at diagnosis, with elevated serum ferritin values. Other possible causes for iron overload (e.g. porphyria cutanea tarda, disorders of erythropoiesis, and transfusional iron overload) were excluded. Patients admitting to excessive alcohol consumption, where this was felt to confound the diagnosis of HH, were excluded. All patients who consented to the study and were not taking anticoagulant medication had a liver biopsy performed; samples were examined to determine the presence or absence of cirrhosis or fibrosis, and the degree of siderosis was graded from 0–4 (11). Only patients with grade 2 or more siderosis were included in our study.
Genetic analysis for mutations in the HFE gene was performed in 170 of 191 patients. The remaining 21 patients were diagnosed before 1996, and genetic testing for the HFE mutation was unavailable at time of diagnosis. When the technique became available, these patients had either died or changed location.
All 18 patients who did not undergo liver biopsy had genetic testing performed; 14 were homozygous for the C282Y mutation, two were homozygous for the H63D mutation, and two were compound heterozygotes. Detailed analysis of the pituitary-gonadal axis was undertaken at diagnosis. Male patients had samples taken for basal serum testosterone, LH, and FSH determinations. An LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) stimulation test was performed on all patients with low basal testosterone levels. LH and FSH levels were measured in all postmenopausal women who were not receiving hormone replacement therapy.
Laboratory methods
Serum testosterone levels were measured by RIA using the TESTO-CT2 kit supplied by Cis Bio International (Gif-sur-Yvette, France). Internal quality control at three levels (low, medium, and high) was run at the beginning and end of each assay. The between-batch coefficients of variation throughout the assay ranged from 10% at the higher level to 14% at the lower level. Samples for testosterone were stored at –20 C before analysis. All samples were analyzed at the time of diagnosis.
LH and FSH levels were measured using two-site fluoroimmunometric assays (AutoDelfia, Wallac, Turku, Finland). Before analysis, samples for LH and FSH were stored at 4 C. The between-batch coefficient of variation ranged from 6% at the higher level to 8% at the lower level for both assays.
Ferritin levels were measured on the ACS 180 up until 1996 (which uses chemiluminescence to quantify the amount of antigen-antibody complex formed) and on the Autodelfia after 1996. Before analysis, samples were stored at 4 C. The coefficient of variation was less than 5% over the measurement range of both methods.
Statistical analysis
One-tailed Fisher’s exact test was used to test for the association between hypogonadism and other complications of HH, and two-tailed Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the prevalence of hypogonadism before 1996 to the prevalence after 1996. A t test was used to compare the mean ages of the hypogonadal and nonhypogonadal males. Pearson’s 
2 test was used to test for an association between hepatic siderosis and hypogonadism.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
. Rates of hepatic cirrhosis and diabetes mellitus at diagnosis are lower than those in previous studies of HH. The results of genetic testing for the HFE gene mutations are shown in Table 2.
|
|
. In one patient, initially low testosterone levels returned to normal after venesection.
|
. The amplitude of the LH and FSH responses to LHRH are reduced or inappropriately normal for the low basal testosterone levels, in keeping with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.
Table 4 shows the clinical features of the nine males with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.
|
compares the hypogonadal males to the nonhypogonadal males. Hypogonadal males were more likely to have cirrhosis, ferritin levels greater than 1500 ng/ml at diagnosis, and grade 4 siderosis on liver biopsy. A greater proportion of hypogonadal patients had diabetes mellitus, but the difference was not statistically significant.
|
compares male patients diagnosed before 1996 with those diagnosed after 1996. Patients diagnosed in the early period of the study were more likely to have hypogonadism, hepatic cirrhosis, or diabetes.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
These earlier reports are in contrast to our findings, where we observed a prevalence of hypogonadism of only 6.4% in men with HH. Unlike many of these previous studies, our findings derive from a large group of unselected patients attending a single center. Thus, we believe that these observations are a true reflection of the prevalence of pituitary-gonadal dysfunction in patients with HH at the present time. It is also interesting to note that although the number of patients with hypogonadism in each period of our study is quite small, the prevalence of hypogonadism appeared to decline over the period of our study, because 14.6% of patients diagnosed in the earlier period of the study had hypogonadotropic hypogonadism compared with 3% of those diagnosed in the more recent period (Table 6).
We specifically excluded patients with mutations in the HFE gene, but in whom siderosis of less than grade 2 was present at liver biopsy. Such lesser degrees of siderosis are nonspecific and may be found in a variety of conditions other than HH (11). These patients, therefore, although expressing the HH genotype, cannot be said to have HH in the conventional sense, because they do not express the HH phenotype. The natural history of such patients is unclear; it is not known whether all such patients will ultimately develop significant iron overload if left untreated. Although these patients were excluded from our final analysis, they were evaluated for the presence of hypogonadism, and no case of hypogonadism was found in this patient group.
It seems likely that the low prevalence of hypogonadism in our patients is a result of earlier diagnosis of HH in recent years; this, in turn, is due to a number of factors: increasing awareness of the disorder among physicians and general practitioners, more ready access to relevant biochemical screening for physicians in both primary care and hospital practice, and identification of mutations of the HFE gene, which has resulted in widespread screening of asymptomatic relatives of patients with HH. A number of facts support this view. Firstly, diabetes mellitus and hepatic cirrhosis, both complications known to be associated with significantly greater body iron stores (12) and therefore more advanced disease, were present at diagnosis in only 22% and 14% of the patients in this series, respectively, in marked contrast to the studies mentioned above, in which the prevalence of these complications was markedly greater. Secondly, in parallel with the higher prevalence of hypogonadism in patients diagnosed in the early period of our study, both of these complications were more frequent in those patients diagnosed in the earlier period of our study, when awareness of HH was not so widespread and before genetic testing was available (Table 6). Finally, when we evaluated the factors that led to the diagnosis of HH in our patients, we found that significantly more patients presented in the earlier period of the study because of the presence of symptoms or complications of the disease, such as skin pigmentation, joint pains, diabetes, or abnormal liver blood tests, rather than through familial screening or serendipity (65% before 1996 vs. 41% after; by Pearson’s 2 test, P = 0.018). This indicates that in the later period of our study, more patients were indeed being diagnosed at an earlier, asymptomatic stage of the disease.
A possible confounding factor in any analysis of male hypogonadism is the natural decline in testosterone that occurs with aging, a subject that has received much recent attention. The largest longitudinal study into the effects of healthy ageing on male testosterone levels, the Massachusetts Male Aging Study (13), followed 1156 men for a period of 7–10 yr and demonstrated an average decline in total testosterone levels of 1.6%/yr. There is no doubt, therefore, that some healthy elderly males will have testosterone levels that are below the normal reference range for a given laboratory, but are normal compared with testosterone levels from men of similar age. The decline in testosterone with aging is less when total testosterone is measured, as in our study, compared with when free testosterone is measured, due to the coexisting increase in SHBG that occurs with aging.
A number of factors suggest, however, that this natural decline in testosterone does not confound our analysis. Firstly, the apparent decline in the prevalence of hypogonadism over the period of our study occurred despite the fact that there was no significant difference in average patient age for the two periods of study (Table 6). Also, although some studies of male aging have suggested that the decline in testosterone with aging is not associated with a rise in LH and FSH values (14), the Massachusetts Male Aging Study, a well conducted, longitudinal study of a large number of male subjects, demonstrated rises in LH and FSH of 0.9% and 3.1%/yr, respectively, in association with the decline in testosterone, and similar results were reported in the New Mexico Aging Process Study (15). Therefore, although LH and FSH levels may not necessarily rise above the normal range with aging, one would expect values to rise at least into the mid to high normal range. All of our elderly hypogonadal males, however, had LH or FSH levels in the below normal or low normal range in association with their low testosterone levels (patients 1–6; Table 3). The results of LHRH testing are also supportive of our conclusions (Table 3). Previous studies of the response to LHRH in elderly males (14, 16) found that LH values rose at least 4–5 times above their basal value 30 min after administration of LHRH, unlike the results in our patients. Notwithstanding the above arguments, in the absence of a control group of healthy males followed over the same time period, it is difficult to be absolutely certain that our group of hypogonadal patients does not contain a patient(s) with low testosterone due to the natural decline in testosterone with aging. However, the inclusion of such patients would merely result in our reported rates of hypogonadism being an overestimation and, therefore, would not weaken our conclusion that the prevalence of hypogonadism in HH is lower than that in previous studies.
In contrast to their female counterparts, our male patients with hypogonadism did not have imaging of their pituitary gland performed. Hypogonadism is a well recognized complication of advanced HH in males and, therefore, was certainly considered a more likely cause of hypogonadism in our patients than a pituitary lesion. All of our patients had a metyrapone test performed to assess the integrity of their hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, and all were normal, as were prolactin levels. Thyroid function tests were performed in all patients at diagnosis, and no patient had abnormalities in thyroid function testing suggestive of pituitary disease. One patient, as mentioned, had a return of gonadal function after venesection, making a pituitary tumor an unlikely cause of his hypogonadism. None of the remaining patients developed any symptoms or signs of a pituitary tumor on follow-up.
Although occasional cases of hypogonadism, invariably hypogonadotropic in type, have been recorded in females with HH (9, 17, 18, 19, 20), the subject has received relatively little attention, and there have been no studies of adequate size to indicate the likely prevalence of the problem. This is the largest series of females reported to date in which the subject has been evaluated. Of the 38 patients in whom it was possible to assess pituitary-gonadal function, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism associated with HH was observed in two (5.2%). Because isolated gonadotropic deficiency in postmenopausal females may not be associated with signs or symptoms, it is likely to be overlooked if not specifically sought.
In summary, we report a prevalence of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism of 6.4% among a large series of male patients with HH. Our data suggest that the prevalence of hypogonadism may be decreasing, probably as the result of earlier diagnosis of HH. Despite the low prevalence of hypogonadism, it still remains an important complication and should be considered in all patients with HH. The diagnosis must be based on hormonal evaluation, because clinical assessment can be misleading (2, 6). Its presence has important implications for the patient, because testosterone replacement (21) together with aggressive venesection (7, 22) can significantly improve the quality of life and restore sexual function and may have an important effect on bone mass (23). Our study suggests, however, that patients with lesser degrees of hepatic siderosis on liver biopsy who do not have hepatic cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, or markedly elevated serum ferritin levels are unlikely to have hypogonadism. In these patients, there may be no immediate need for hormonal evaluation.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: HH, Hereditary hemochromatosis; LHRH, LH-releasing hormone
Received May 24, 2004.
Accepted January 12, 2005.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  C. M. Francucci, C. Gatti, A. Camilletti, P. Fiscaletti, R. Caudarella, and M. Boscaro Hypogonadism and Reduced Bone Mineral Density in Heterozygous H63D Mutation in the HFE Gene: An Unusual Presentation of Hereditary Hemochromatosis J Androl, January 1, 2007; 28(1): 21 - 26. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. W. Swinkels, M. C.H. Janssen, J. Bergmans, and J. J.M. Marx Hereditary Hemochromatosis: Genetic Complexity and New Diagnostic Approaches Clin. Chem., June 1, 2006; 52(6): 950 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |
