| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences (G.K., F.S., J.H., C.J.L.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8063; Center for Reproductive Sciences (R.T.), University of California, San Francisco, California 94143; Reproductive and Developmental Sciences (H.O.D.C.), Centre for Reproductive Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, United Kingdom; and Centre for Womens Health Research (P.A.W.R.), Monash University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Graciela Krikun, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, P.O. Box 208063, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8063. E-mail: graciela.krikun{at}yale.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. In addition, PR mRNA was also detectable in both HEEC sources. Microarray analysis demonstrated that treatment of HEEC cultures with either estradiol or medroxyprogesterone acetate produced differential effects on a wide variety of genes, and cluster analysis demonstrated that many of the genes are involved in intracellular signaling and enzymatic pathways. Thus, quantitative RT-PCR and microarray analyses demonstrate that HEECs express ER-ß and PR mRNA and that gene expression by HEECs is differentially regulated by treatment with estrogen or progestin. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ß, and two dominant forms of the progesterone receptor (PR), A and B (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). Although the expression of these receptors has been clearly identified in the endometrial glandular epithelium and stromal cells (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13), evidence of their presence in the endometrial microvasculature has been the subject of conflicting reports in the literature. Critchley et al. (13) demonstrated immunoreactive ER-ß, but not ER-
, in the nuclei of endothelial cells from most spiral arteries, capillaries, and veins of the human and nonhuman primate endometrium. Lecce et al. (11) also presented immunohistochemical evidence that ER-ß was present in endothelial cells, in addition to the nuclei of glandular epithelial and stromal cells. Iruela-Arispe et al. (14) reported positive ER and PR protein and mRNA in passaged (x5) endometrial endothelial cell cultures; however, these authors did not discriminate between ER isoforms. In contrast, Press et al. (15) reported that immunoreactive PR could not be detected in endometrial endothelial cells. Thus, we sought to confirm the nature of ovarian steroid receptor expression in human microvascular endometrial endothelial cells (HEECs) and to ascertain whether these steroids resulted in a differential gene expression profile. | Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endometrial tissue specimens were obtained from women of reproductive age undergoing hysterectomies for myomas who were not receiving hormonal therapy. Tissues obtained were either from the proliferative or the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle. All subjects provided written informed consent and institutional approval from the Human Investigation Committee of the Yale-New Haven Hospital (New Haven, CT). Endometrial tissue was transported to a sterile laminar flow hood, and isolation of the component cells was conducted as follows. HEECs from our laboratory were isolated as previously described (16) and either directly frozen for studies on noncultured cells or cultured and grown to confluence on flasks coated with 2% gelatin in EGM-2 MV Singlequot Medium with 5% stripped fetal calf serum (Cambrex Bio Science, Inc., Walkersville, MD). The cells were harvested by trypsin-EDTA and split 1:6 for three to five passages.
For the purposes of confirming the results obtained with HEECs isolated in our laboratory, we also obtained HEECs isolated in the laboratory of Dr. Peter Rogers that were sent for analysis to our laboratory in Yale University. Dr. Rogers prepared the cells as follows. Endometrial tissue was digested as described by Schatz et al. (16) and then trypsinized and pelleted. Red blood cells were removed by resuspension of the cells in 10 ml PBS/BSA solution and overlayed with Ficoll Paque (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK). This suspension was centrifuged, and interface cells were carefully removed and washed twice with 30 ml PBS/BSA solution. Ulex europa lectin-specific-coated Dynabeads (Dynal Biotech Inc., Brown Deer, WI) were added at four beads per cell in a 100- to 200-µl vol in a 0.65-ml tube and rotated for 1 h at 4 C. Dynal-MPC (Dynal Biotech Inc.) was used to collect the bead-coated cells, washed, and microscopically checked for purity.
Human endometrial cell cultures
Passaged confluent cells were maintained in EGM-2MV medium to which was added vehicle control, estradiol (E2; 108 M), or medroxyprogesterone acetate (107 M) for 48 h. Primary human endometrial stromal, glandular epithelial, and decidual cells (DCs) were obtained and grown to confluence and shown to be of high purity as previously described (17, 18).
mRNA analyses
Total RNA was isolated with Tri Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as previously described (18). After optimization of all probes by semiquantitative RT-PCR, real time-quantitative RT-PCR was conducted as follows. RT was initially carried out with avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). A quantitative standard curve was then created using a range of 500 pg to 250 ng cDNA. The curve was created with the Roche Light Cycler (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) by monitoring the increasing fluorescence of PCR products during amplification. Once the standard curve was established, quantitation of the unknowns was determined with the Roche Light Cycler and adjusted to the quantitative expression of ß-actin from these same unknowns. Melting curve analysis was conducted to determine the specificity of the amplified products and the absence of primer-dimer formation. All products obtained yielded the correct melting temperature.
The primers shown below were previously described (20, 21, 22), and the ER-ß primers were synthesized and gel purified at the Yale DNA Synthesis Laboratory, Critical Technologies.
Microarray analysis
Cells were harvested from a Falcon T-25 flask with QIAzol lysis reagent and total RNA isolated according to the manufacturers instruction (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). A total of 100 µg RNA was cleaned and precipitated using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) to prepare the template for cDNA synthesis. A T7-(dT)24 oligo-primer was used to synthesize double-stranded cDNA by the SuperScript Choice System (Invitrogen), which was subsequently cleaned up by Phase Lock Gels-Phenol/Chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The ENZO BioArray High Yield RNA Transcript Labeling Kit (T7) (ENZO, Farmingdale, NY) was used to generate biotinylated cRNA. Additional cRNA clean-up was carried out by RNeasy Mini Kit before the fragmentation of biotinylated cRNAs with 5x fragmentation buffer (200 mM Tris, pH 8.1; 500 mM KOAc; 150 mM MgOAc). The chemically fragmented cRNAs were then hybridized on Affymetrix (Santa Clara, CA) HG-U133A 2.0 human chips, screening for 18,400 human genes and expressed sequence tags, followed by fluorescence labeling and optical scanning.
Raw data without normalization generated from Affymetrix GeneChip Operating Software Version 1.1.1 (Affymetrix) were analyzed by GeneSpring software 6.1 (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, CA). The gene readouts were normalized to the 50th percentile of the distribution of all measurements in each chip. Per-gene normalization was performed using the median value of each gene throughout different chips in the same experimental condition. The normalized data were first filtered based on flag calls on each transcript to eliminate genes that were absent in all experimental conditions. Fold ratios were derived from comparing normalized data between control and treatment groups that were up- or down-regulated more than 4.0-fold by E2 or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). A Venn diagram was used to generate gene lists regulated by E2 or MPA or both steroids.
Immunohistochemical analysis
Immunostaining for ER-
, ER-ß, and PR was conducted as previously described in frozen endometrial tissue specimens (13). Endometrial tissue was collected from women undergoing hysterectomy as described above. All women reported regular menstrual cycles (2535 d) and had not received exogenous hormones or used an intrauterine device in the 3 months before inclusion in the study. Samples were fixed overnight at 4 C in 4% paraformaldehyde, rinsed, and stored in 70% ethanol before routine processing into paraffin. Menstrual cycle phase was confirmed by histological dating and by serum samples taken at the time of hysterectomy for determination of circulating progesterone and E2 levels by RIA.
Tissue sections were dewaxed, rehydrated, and subjected to antigen retrieval either in a microwave oven for ER-
and PR or in a pressure cooker for ER-ß. For ER-
, the sections were incubated at 37 C for 60 min with a 1:400 dilution of mouse monoclonal antibody clone 1D5 (Dako Corp., Cambridge, UK). Negative controls were performed by replacing the primary antibody with mouse IgG at a matched concentration. For ER-ß, the sections were incubated overnight at 4 C at a 1:800 dilution of anti-hER-ß antibody (anti-hER-ß1, MCA 1974S; Serotec Ltd., Oxford, UK). The negative control step involved incubation of prediluted antibody with an excess of the unconjugated form of the peptide used for immunization overnight at 4 C.
For PR, sections were incubated with primary antibody mouse monoclonal antibody (NCL-PgR, NovoCastra Laboratories Ltd., Newcastle, UK) at a dilution of 1:40 for 60 min at 37 C. This antibody recognizes both isoforms of PR (PR-A and PR-B). Negative controls were performed by replacing the primary antibody with mouse IgG at a matched antibody concentration. Visualization of epitopes was with chromagen 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The presence of ER-
was clearly demonstrated after quantitative RT-PCR from RNA extracted from three separate preparations of cultured endometrial stromal cells and endometrial glands. Figure 1
, top, shows the melting curve analysis for ER-
for the stromal cells and glands. Correct product formation was demonstrated from all preparations, and sequencing at the correct molecular weight band confirmed the identity of ER-
after RT-PCR. In contrast, Fig. 1
, bottom, shows that no ER-
product is present in six different preparations of cultured endothelial cells as demonstrated by the lack of a specific melting curve. Because of the possibility that culturing and passaging cells may affect the levels of ER-
expression, total RNA was isolated from uncultured and, hence, unpassaged HEECs and analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR. Again, no ER-
mRNA was observed (data not shown).
|
for cultured and uncultured/unpassaged HEECs compared with cultured endometrial stromal and glandular epithelial cells. The highest expression of ER-
was observed in human endometrial stromal cells (HESCs). All preparations expressed ß-actin, and values are expressed as a ratio to the latter to adjust for initial levels of total RNA from each sample.
|
mRNA in endometrial endothelial cells caused us to confirm this observation using multiple primer sets that interrogated different coding domains along the receptor cDNA. In all cases, RT-PCR failed to reveal expression of ER-
mRNA transcripts in cultured and uncultured HEECs. In contrast, all primer pairs amplified ER-
mRNA from cultured endometrial stromal and glandular epithelial cells (data not shown).
We next compared the expression of ER-ß in low-passage cultured and freshly isolated HEECs with that of cultured endometrial stromal and glandular epithelial cells by quantitative real- time RT-PCR. All cells demonstrated the presence of ER-ß (Fig. 3
), and all were observed within the appropriate melt curve (data not shown).
|
|
The finding that ER-ß and PR mRNA were expressed in cultured HEECs led us to analyze the expression of these proteins by immunohistochemistry of endometrial sections. In this case, we did not observe PR or ER-
expression by the endothelial or glandular epithelial cells but did observe low levels in the surrounding stromal cells. In contrast, high levels of ER-ß were present in the glandular epithelium, the stromal cells, and the endometrial endothelial cells (Fig. 5
).
|
Given our findings demonstrating that cultured HEECs expressed PR and ER-ß mRNA, we investigated the differential effects of estrogen and progestin in these cells. Hence, cultured HEECs were treated for 2 d with vehicle control or with 108 M E2 or 107 M MPA, and total RNA was extracted and analyzed by microarray analysis. Compared with controls, several differences were observed for the E2- or MPA-treated HEECs. It was interesting to note that, although present, no steroidal regulation of the classic angiogenic factors was observed (Table 1
). These factors, namely vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and angiopoietin-2, as well as their corresponding receptors, have been implicated in aberrant endometrial angiogenesis in patients receiving long-term progestin-only contraceptives (23, 24, 25, 26). Consistent with our previous findings on the protein expression of angiopoietins, both treatments with E2 or MPA resulted in absent calls for angiopoietin-1 and present calls for angiopoietin-2 in HEECs (22). Surprisingly, however, the vehicle control HEECs received a present call for angiopoietin-1.
|
Finally, Table 2
limits the analysis to clusters of genes regulating specific pathways and enzyme systems that were either up- or down-regulated more than 4-fold by E2 or MPA. It is interesting that many of these genes were reported to be similarly regulated by estrogen or progestin in other systems (Table 2
), including the following: transformation gene ERBB-3, creatine kinase, cytochrome P450CYP3A4, thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, arylsulfatase D, arachidonate 12-lipoxygenase, tyrosine hydroxylase, manganese superoxide dismutase, and human placental alkaline phosphatase-like and estrogen sulfotransferase (27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37). Additionally, when compared with isolated endometrial DCs, the HEECs showed classic expression of endothelial cell markers such as von Willebrand factor, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (CD31), and Tie-1 and Tie-2 (Table 3
). The latter was also expressed by DCs. In contrast, the HEECs did not express DC markers such as CXCL12, prolactin, or IGFBP-5 (Table 3
). Quantitative RT-PCR analysis confirmed the presence or absence of several of these endpoints (data not shown). These findings demonstrate the purity of the isolated endothelial cells.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
mRNA or protein but do express ER-ß mRNA and protein and PR mRNA. Due to the low levels of PR expression, we were unable to separate out the expression of PR-A vs. PR-B. At the protein level, we demonstrated the expression of ER-ß by the endothelial cells but could not demonstrate the presence of PR or ER-
. Failure to detect PR protein in endometrial endothelial cells is likely due to the very low level of protein present, which was below the detection limits of standard immunohistochemistry. Levels of PR mRNA may also be low but are detectable by the amplification and greater sensitivity of real-time quantitative RT-PCR.
We have demonstrated independent effects of estrogen and progestin on these cells using microarray assessments of mRNA expression. Interestingly, we found no effects of either steroid on endothelial expression of angiogenic factors (Table 1
) whose dysregulation has been associated with the abnormal uterine bleeding found in patients receiving long-term progestin-only contraceptives as well as a variety of other uterine pathological states. Indeed, prior studies have shown that hypoxia and/or thrombin enhanced endometrial stromal and glandular epithelial expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-2 while suppressing angiopoietin-1 (17, 19, 23).
In contrast, the finding that treatment of HEECs with estrogen or progestin resulted in differential expression on other genes suggests that the ER-ß and PR may indeed be functionally active. Analysis of gene expression by pathway-clustering suggests that steroid hormones exert potent effects on many unexpected endpoints including MAPK-kinase-kinase 8, suggesting that intermediate signaling pathways are activated by ovarian steroids in HEECs. Interestingly, previous experiments from our laboratory have shown that endometria from women treated with long-term progestin contraceptives displayed enhanced expression of stress-induced kinases (23).
Our findings regarding the expression of steroid receptors in endometrial endothelial cells have broad clinical implications. Although no changes were observed on classic angiogenic genes, the induction of intermediate signaling and enzymatic pathways suggests that steroids may act synergistically with paracrine mediators or act indirectly to mediate downstream angiogenic pathways.
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online December 21, 2004
Abbreviations: DC, Decidual cell; E2, estradiol; ER, estrogen receptor; HEEC, human microvascular endometrial endothelial cell; HESC, human endometrial stromal cells; MPA, medroxyprogesterone acetate; PR, progesterone receptor.
Received September 13, 2004.
Accepted December 2, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
regulates implantation in mice. J Biol Chem 279:1157011581This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Haouzi, S. Assou, K. Mahmoud, S. Tondeur, T. Reme, B. Hedon, J. De Vos, and S. Hamamah Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1436 - 1445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rae, A. Mohamad, D. Price, P. W. F. Hadoke, B. R. Walker, J. I. Mason, S. G. Hillier, and H. O. D. Critchley Cortisol Inactivation by 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-2 May Enhance Endometrial Angiogenesis via Reduced Thrombospondin-1 in Heavy Menstruation J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2009; 94(4): 1443 - 1450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. O. D. Critchley and P. T. K. Saunders Hormone Receptor Dynamics in a Receptive Human Endometrium Reproductive Sciences, February 1, 2009; 16(2): 191 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bredhult, L. Sahlin, and M. Olovsson Gene expression analysis of human endometrial endothelial cells exposed to op'-DDT Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 14(2): 97 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sha, D. Wu, L. Zhang, X. Chen, M. Lei, H. Sun, S. Lin, and J. Lang Differentially expressed genes in human endometrial endothelial cells derived from eutopic endometrium of patients with endometriosis compared with those from patients without endometriosis Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3159 - 3169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Horne and D. L. Blithe Progesterone receptor modulators and the endometrium: changes and consequences Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 567 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.D. Catalano, H.O. Critchley, O. Heikinheimo, D.T. Baird, D. Hapangama, J.R.A. Sherwin, D.S. Charnock-Jones, S.K. Smith, and A.M. Sharkey Mifepristone induced progesterone withdrawal reveals novel regulatory pathways in human endometrium Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 13(9): 641 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Silvestri and H. M Fraser Oestrogen and progesterone receptors in the marmoset endometrium: changes during the ovulatory cycle, early pregnancy and after inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor, GnRH or ovariectomy Reproduction, August 1, 2007; 134(2): 341 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.A. Horcajadas, A. Pellicer, and C. Simon Wide genomic analysis of human endometrial receptivity: new times, new opportunities Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 77 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |