help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2004-1861
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/3/1686    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chatterton, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Gann, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chatterton, R. T., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Gann, P. H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRONE
*PROGESTERONE
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 3 1686-1691
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

Comparison of Hormone Levels in Nipple Aspirate Fluid of Pre- and Postmenopausal Women: Effect of Oral Contraceptives and Hormone Replacement

Robert T. Chatterton, Jr., Angela S. Geiger, Esnar T. Mateo, Irene B. Helenowski and Peter H. Gann

Departments of Obstetrics/Gynecology (R.T.C., A.S.G., E.T.M.), Physiology (R.T.C.), Preventive Medicine (I.B.H., P.H.G.), and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center (R.T.C., A.S.G., E.T.M., I.B.H., P.H.G.), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Robert T. Chatterton, Ph.D., Department of Ob/Gyn, 710 North Fairbanks Court, Room 8408, Chicago, Illinois 60611. E-mail: chat{at}northwestern.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The effects of ovarian suppression by oral contraceptives as well as hormone replacement therapy were studied on hormone levels and on products of hormone action in nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) from breasts of pre- and postmenopausal women. Multiple samples per subject revealed high consistency (intraclass correlation coefficients) for all products measured. Compared with premenopausal women, NAF progesterone was much lower in postmenopausal women, but NAF androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations were not different. With oral contraceptive use, estradiol, estrone sulfate, and progesterone levels were similarly lower in serum and NAF. In postmenopausal women, NAF estradiol and estrone sulfate were not significantly less than those in premenopausal women, nor were epidermal growth factor or cathepsin D levels, but IL-6 was elevated. Despite corresponding changes in hormones in serum and NAF over time, correlations based on simultaneous sampling were not significant. It is concluded that: 1) potential precursors of estradiol remain at comparable levels in the breast after menopause; 2) local synthesis is important for maintenance of estradiol levels in NAF of postmenopausal women but less important for progesterone; and 3) changes in the serum parameters are accurately reflected in NAF, but only after a matter of days. These findings provide additional validation for the physiological relevance of NAF hormone levels as potential breast cancer risk markers.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CONCENTRATIONS OF HORMONES and products of estrogen action have been measured in nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) of normally menstruating premenopausal women (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). The stability of these compounds in NAF over time and the variation between breasts have been reported (1). If hormone concentrations in the expressible fluid of the breast represent the concentrations available to the parenchyma, it is logical to assume that they would be more direct determinants of breast cancer risk than circulating hormone levels. A phytoestrogen-containing soy supplement increased estrogen-inducible proteins pS2 and cathepsin D and decreased estrogen-inhibited proteins apolipoprotein D and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (prolactin-inducible protein) in NAF (4, 5). We have observed that the concentrations of estradiol-promoted products cathepsin D and epidermal growth factor (EGF) are more closely related to the concentrations of estradiol in NAF than to circulating estrogens in blood (6). However, if hormone concentrations in NAF are biologically relevant, and therefore potentially useful as markers of breast cancer risk, they should be modulated by hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and oral contraceptive (OC) use, both of which represent major alterations in sex steroid profiles in postmenopausal and premenopausal women, respectively. An earlier study suggested that the concentration of estrogens in NAF is not significantly reduced after menopause (2), which would be consistent with breast cancer risk in older women despite the dramatic reduction in circulating estrogens. In this study, we evaluated concentrations of estrogens, estrogen precursors, and response proteins in selected groups of healthy women to compare the effects of HRT, OC use, and menopause itself on serum vs. NAF concentrations.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

Premenopausal women were those described in previous reports (1, 7). This group of 47 women formed the basis for comparison of the other groups. The age of the women ranged from 20–40 yr. They had menstrual cycles of 25–35 d, and they were not lactating and had not taken OCs or other drugs that may affect hormone metabolism within the last 6 months. The other groups were 13 women taking OCs, 18 postmenopausal women (including three who had an oophorohysterectomy) who were not taking HRT, and seven women who were taking HRT.

The mean age of the group taking OCs was 30.4 ± 5.1 yr (range, 22–36 yr) with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.2 ± 8.0 kg/m2. They had been taking OCs for at least 4 months before entry into the study. They came to the General Clinical Research Center at Northwestern Memorial Hospital on three occasions within a month: the first visit was 6 d after completing a cycle of active drug; the next visit was 14 d later; and the last visit was 21 d after the first visit. All women were taking tricyclic OCs, Tri-Norinyl (Searle), Ortho-Novum (Ortho-McNeil), Tri-Levlen (Berlex), Triphasil (Wyeth-Ayerst), or Otho Tri-Cyclen (Ortho-McNeil). None were taking any medications, other than the OCs, that might interfere with the hormone measurements to be made, nor did any of these subjects have any chronic diseases that might compromise metabolism. Of 50 subjects on whom NAF collection was attempted, only 13 (26%) produced more than 50 µl adequate for analyses.

The mean age of postmenopausal women not taking HRT was 50.9 ± 4.8 yr (range, 43–66 yr) with a mean BMI of 27.0 ± 5.5 kg/m2. They had not had a menstrual period for more than 1 yr before sampling or had had an oophorohysterectomy more than 1 yr before sampling. Serum levels of estradiol and progesterone (see Table 2Go) were in the range expected for postmenopausal women. The mean 5-yr Gail score for breast cancer risk was 0.87 ± 0.37. None had had a menstrual period within the previous 6 months. None were taking any medications that might interfere with the hormone measurements to be made, nor did any of these subjects have any chronic diseases that might compromise metabolism. Three samples were collected from each volunteer not closer than 2 wk apart. Of 60 subjects on whom NAF collection was attempted, 18 (30%) produced sufficient volume for analyses.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Geometric mean concentrations of steroids in serum of normally ovulating premenopausal women, those taking OCs, as well as postmenopausal women without and with HRT

 
The mean age of postmenopausal women taking HRT was 55.7 ± 7.2 yr (range, 55–66 yr) with a mean BMI of 26.7 ± 4.1 kg/m2. The mean 5-yr Gail score was 1.41 ± 0.44. All had been taking HRT (Prempro) for at least 4 months. None were taking any medications that might interfere with the hormone measurements to be made, nor did any have any chronic diseases that might compromise metabolism. Three samples were collected from each volunteer not closer than 2 wk apart. Of 17 subjects on whom NAF collection was attempted, seven (41%) produced sufficient volume for analyses.

All procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Northwestern University.

Sample collection

Blood and NAF were obtained at each visit for hormone measurements. NAF was collected by warming and massaging the breast and aspirating a small volume of liquid from the nipple using a specially designed vacuum device (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, MA). The NAF was collected in a calibrated capillary tube, the ends were sealed, and the sample was stored at –20 C.

Analytical methods

The procedure for analysis of the NAF has been described in detail recently (1). Briefly, NAF was diluted with PBS (pH 7.4) and extracted with ethyl acetate-hexane (3:2). The organic extract was evaporated and partitioned between isooctane and 0.4 N aqueous NaOH to separate the respective phenolic from nonphenolic steroids. The proteins and steroid sulfates [EGF, cathepsin D, estrone sulfate, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) sulfate] were measured in the remaining aqueous phase after ethyl acetate-hexane extraction; DHEA, androstenedione, and progesterone were measured in the nonphenolic fraction, and estradiol was measured in the phenolic fraction. All measurements were performed by standard immunoassays in the reconstituted fractions (1). The cross-reaction of ethynyl estradiol in the estradiol assay was less than 0.1%, and that of medroxyprogesterone acetate in the progesterone assay was less than 0.01%. The intraassay coefficients of variation (CVs) for the assays were as follows: EGF, 7.5%; cathepsin D, 12.6%; estrone sulfate, 6.9%; DHEA sulfate, 8.0%; DHEA, 4.6%; androstenedione, 15.2%; and progesterone, 16.0%. Insufficient batches of each analyte were assayed for estimation of interassay CV. Analytes with concentrations close to the limit of sensitivity of the method had higher CVs. Serum hormones and other products were measured by standard immunoassays as described in detail previously (1, 8).

Statistical methods

All data were transformed to their natural logs for comparisons. This transformation led to adequate normalization of the variables. Mean skewness values, calculated by the SAS, version 8 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), univariate procedure on logs of the variables were all less than ± 1.0 except for EGF, which had a value of ±1.6. Significant skewness with an N of 35 per comparison by this procedure is ±1.07. This brings some additional uncertainty in the estimates of the significance of comparisons with EGF. The significance of the difference between values in each group from those of the premenopausal subjects was determined by group t tests adjusted by the Bonferroni procedure for multiple comparisons. The means and SD values presented are the antilogs of the calculated values. Rank order correlations were calculated by the Spearman method. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated as described by Pinheiro and Bates (9), with confidence limits determined by the procedure of Jovanovic and Viana (10).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OC group

No significant difference in levels of progesterone occurred between the first, second, or third samples collected from each subject, although the first sample was collected 6 d after the last active medication was taken; the mean concentrations in the first and third samples were 0.53 ± 1.44 (SE) ng/ml (1.7 ± 4.6 nmol/liter) and 0.41 ± 1.16 (SE) ng/ml (1.3 ± 3.7 nmol/liter), respectively. Estradiol in the first and third samples was, however, different (P < 0.01) with a doubling from the 21-d sample 15.2 ± 1.20 (SE) pg/ml (55.8 ± 4.4 pmol/liter) to the sixth day after cessation of OC administration [33.2 ± 1.2 (SE) pg/ml, i.e. 121.9 ± 4.4 pmol/liter].

Progesterone was suppressed by OCs to insignificant levels in both serum and NAF. The correlation of serum and NAF progesterone was 0.18 in controls and 0.00 with OCs. The concentrations of estradiol in serum and NAF of premenopausal women not taking OCs (control group) were almost identical (Tables 1Go and 2Go). Compared with controls, women taking OCs had almost identical, significantly lower levels of estradiol in serum and NAF (71 and 68% lower, averaged across the three time periods). Although hormone concentrations varied across visits in OC users, the average reasonably reflects integrated levels during the course of 1 month of OC use. Nevertheless, the correlations between estradiol concentrations in serum and NAF, measured in samples collected simultaneously, were only 0.25 and 0.22 in controls and women with OCs, respectively. Whereas the concentration of estrone sulfate was 150-fold greater in NAF than serum, the suppression by OCs was proportionally similar, 79% in serum and 89% in NAF. None of the other steroids in NAF were affected by the treatment. Cathepsin D, EGF, and IL-6 in NAF were also not significantly altered by the combination of endogenous and exogenous hormones.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Geometric mean concentrations of steroids, cathepsin D, EGF, and IL-6 in NAF of normally ovulating premenopausal women, those taking OC, as well as postmenopausal women without and with HRT

 
Postmenopausal group

The three samples from each postmenopausal woman were taken as a single estimate to represent that subject. The mean progesterone concentration was only 6.7 nmol/liter in the postmenopausal women (Table 1Go). However, individuals varied greatly. Eight of 18 women had at least one breast with a value of 37.7 ng/ml (120 nmol/liter) or more. The mean of the 13 breasts with the highest values was 145 ± 2.5 (SE) ng/ml (462 ± 7.9 nmol/liter). The increase was specific to a breast. For example, the right breast of one woman had 454 and 350 ng/ml (1444 and 1113 nmol/liter) on two occasions, whereas her left breast had less than 0.9 ng/ml (<3.0 nmol/liter). Serum progesterone levels in these women averaged 0.38 ± 1.19 (SE) ng/ml (1.2 ± 3.8 nmol/liter). The correlation between serum and NAF progesterone was only 0.13.

The mean progesterone level of the women with high BMI (those with >37.7 ng/ml, i.e. >120 nmol/liter) was significantly greater than that of the other postmenopausal women, 10.0 ± 1.8 (SE) and 7.9 ± 1.2 (SE) ng/ml (31.7 ± 5.8 and 25.3 ± 3.8 nmol/liter), respectively (P = 0.01). The subjects with high progesterone did not have higher estradiol levels than the group as a whole.

Compared with the premenopausal control group, mean NAF estradiol concentrations were 62% lower in the postmenopausal women (Table 1Go). However, this was not significant despite the highly significantly lower (71% lower) serum levels in the postmenopausal women (Table 2Go). The low levels of estradiol were associated with a negligible correlation between serum and NAF in this group of –0.02. The concentration of estrone sulfate was significantly lower in serum of postmenopausal women but not in NAF, and the correlation between serum and NAF in the postmenopausal women was relatively high at 0.30. In confirmation of the continued presence of estrogen in NAF, no changes in cathepsin D or EGF were observed from values in the premenopausal women. Samples collected but not analyzed in an earlier study of premenopausal women (11) were assayed for cathepsin D and EGF to compare with the postmenopausal women; the concentrations were comparable to those of the premenopausal women in the present study: 1628 ng/ml (32 nmol/liter) and 234 ng/ml (36 nmol/liter), respectively. IL-6 was significantly higher in the postmenopausal women, but no other analytes were different from those found in premenopausal women.

The ICCs with their 95% confidence limits are shown in Table 3Go. Values for premenopausal women are shown for comparison. The estimates in the postmenopausal women were based on three samples over a period of 2–3 months, whereas those for premenopausal women were estimated from 47 women over a period of 15 months. For analytes in which both NAF and serum ICCs could be calculated, the NAF ICCs were in the same range or slightly less. Progesterone was too low for a meaningful estimate in the postmenopausal group. Most ICCs were similar to those of the premenopausal group with values for estrone sulfate, EGF, and DHEA sulfate being highest.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. ICCs for analytes in NAF from untreated pre- and postmenopausal women

 
HRT group

The three samples from each postmenopausal woman on HRT were taken as a single estimate to represent that subject. Estradiol in NAF was seven times greater in the women on HRT than in the premenopausal women and 18 times greater than in postmenopausal control women (Table 1Go). By comparison, serum estradiol was only 2.5-fold higher in HRT users, and serum estrone was 3.7-fold higher (Table 2Go). With the exception of the control postmenopausal women, the correlation between serum and NAF, 0.20, was similar to the other groups. The mean concentration of estrone sulfate, a component of the medication, was significantly elevated in serum but was nonsignificantly lower in NAF of subjects receiving HRT (P = 0.069 with adjustment for multiple comparisons). The correlation of serum and NAF estrone sulfate was 0.02. Progesterone remained at essentially zero levels in NAF. The elevated levels of estradiol in NAF were actually associated with a highly significant decrease in the concentration of cathepsin D in NAF and no change in EGF from control levels.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OCs

Progesterone was suppressed to insignificant concentrations in both serum and NAF by OCs: the levels were undetectable after 7 d of OC use and remained undetectable 6 d after the last pill was taken. The combined OCs inhibit both LH and FSH secretion from the pituitary, suppressing follicular development and ovulation (12). The increase in estradiol in NAF observed in the present study after 6 d off OCs indicates that suppression of gonadotropins is lessening by 6 d, but maturation of the follicle and ovulation would have to occur before progesterone levels could increase. In this respect, the concentrations in NAF reflect those in serum. By comparison with the premenopausal control group, OCs completely suppressed progesterone in both serum and NAF and, therefore, no correlation could be calculated for the OC group.

Estradiol concentrations in serum and NAF were lower by similar proportions in OC compared to nonusers but remained detectable in both fluids. However, the correlations between serum and NAF values in the OC and control groups were only 0.22 and 0.25, respectively. The reason for the apparent discrepancy between the proportional decline and the poor correlation in the levels of estradiol in the two fluids is that serum estradiol concentrations fluctuate greatly day by day and hour by hour (13), whereas NAF estradiol concentrations are much more stable (11). In addition, the efficiency of uptake of estrogens may differ with the serum level of the hormone (14). Although it has not yet been proven, the integrated level of serum estradiol over 1 d or more should correlate closely with the levels of estradiol in NAF although the levels within a single blood sample correlate weakly.

Previous studies suggest that a significant proportion of estradiol in NAF is produced locally from androgen and estrogen sulfate precursors (1, 11, 15, 16). The fact that the suppression of estradiol in NAF was almost exactly proportional to that in serum suggests that serum estradiol relates closely to estradiol in NAF. Nevertheless, we have observed that the concentration of estradiol in NAF is highly significantly associated with local concentrations of both androgen and estrone sulfate in NAF (6) of premenopausal women. Obviously, we cannot determine from these experiments the exact proportion of NAF estradiol that is derived from circulating estradiol and how much is derived from conversion of precursors in the breast. Nevertheless, it is apparent that both contribute to the estradiol in the breast.

The proportional decrease in estrone sulfate in NAF attributable to OCs was similar to or greater than that in serum, yet the concentration in NAF was 150-fold greater than in serum. This is evidence for facilitated uptake from serum against a concentration gradient as described by Pizzagalli et al. (17) and for an equilibrium condition between serum and NAF. The same process applies to the uptake of DHEA sulfate, which was more than 500-fold greater in NAF than in serum. Similarly, high concentrations of the sulfonated steroids have been found in breast cysts (18, 19). The pool of estrone sulfate may be converted to estrone by the action of aryl sulfatase and then to estradiol by 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 in the breast epithelium (11, 20). Similarly, DHEA sulfate may serve as an estrogen precursor (21).

It is important to note that the concentrations of EGF and cathepsin D were not less in the NAF of the women on OCs. EGF has been shown to be related to serum levels of estradiol within individuals (22), and cathepsin D has an estrogen response element in the promoter region of the gene, and its synthesis is promoted by estradiol (23, 24). Thus, the levels of these estrogen-responsive proteins in NAF indicate that the ethynyl estradiol in the OCs maintained but did not elevate the levels of these products in the breast. Interestingly, the lack of increases in either cathepsin D or EGF in OC users is consistent with results of numerous epidemiological studies that have failed to detect a consistent elevation of breast cancer risk associated with OC use (25, 26, 27).

Postmenopausal women

Participants in the postmenopausal group were relatively young but had not had a menstrual period for at least 6 months. The mean of the natural log values of NAF progesterone was only 5% of the mean values obtained in the midluteal phase of the menstrual cycles of the premenopausal women. Nevertheless, the number of women with substantially higher values without corresponding increases in serum progesterone suggests that progesterone may be synthesized in the breast under some conditions, particularly in obese women. The frequency of persistently high levels in only one breast also suggests that the synthesis is local. Pregnenolone sulfate is a potential precursor that circulates in the blood of postmenopausal women, and it has been identified in high concentration in breast cyst fluid (28, 29). Determining the factors promoting progesterone biosynthesis in the breast may be important from the point of view of prevention of breast cancer. Sulfatase has been demonstrated in the human breast (11, 16), as has 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (30, 31).

The estradiol levels were less than in the premenopausal group but not significantly so. However, the difference between pre- and postmenopausal women would have been greater by comparison with our earlier study of premenopausal women (11). Using the same methodology, the earlier group of premenopausal women had a mean NAF estradiol that was 3.4-fold greater than that of the premenopausal group of this study. The mean serum estradiol concentration was, however, not higher. The reason for the lower NAF estradiol in this study is not known, but we speculated, as discussed earlier (1), that it may be because the subjects in the present study had a high level of physical activity. It is also possible that although the methodology was the same, there was a difference in the processing of the samples that may explain the lower levels of estradiol in the present study. The apparent decline in NAF estradiol from pre- to postmenopause in either study was only half as great as the decline in serum estradiol, supporting the contention that NAF estrogen is synthesized in the breast of postmenopausal women and not strictly dependent on estradiol in the circulation.

The products of estrogen action, EGF and cathepsin D, in the postmenopausal women were similar to those of the premenopausal women of the present study as well as those of the previous study. Thus, the levels of estradiol in the two studies were not closely associated with levels of EGF and cathepsin D. The concentrations of estrone sulfate were much more closely related to these products, suggesting that it may play an important role in determining the overall estrogenic activity present in NAF. The increase in IL-6 in the postmenopausal women may be a result of the known effect of aging on plasma levels of this cytokine (32). The elevated IL-6 levels may promote the synthesis of estradiol in the breast by activating 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 5,4-isomerase (33) and aromatase (34, 35).

The ICCs of the postmenopausal group are comparable to those of the premenopausal women. The calculation of ICCs in this article takes into account the several covariables of the study and is more accurate than the procedure used previously, and, therefore, the values reported here and in the earlier article differ slightly. In particular, the ICC for estradiol is significantly higher. Overall, the ICCs of both pre- and postmenopausal women are high and indicate that the analytes in NAF represent stable variables that have predictive value.

HRT group

Hormone therapy with a combination of equine-conjugated estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate resulted in 2.5 times higher levels of serum estradiol and 18 times higher levels of estradiol in NAF on average than were found in postmenopausal women. Thus, increases in circulating estradiol clearly have an effect on the levels of estradiol within the breast. The relation to serum estrone sulfate is more complex. Serum levels were significantly higher by 3.7-fold, but levels in NAF were nonsignificantly lower by 51%. No reason for this is evident. Salivary estrone sulfate levels in women on HRT were also lower by 26% (Chatterton, R., I. Helenowski, and P. Gann, unpublished results). To establish the significance of the apparent decrease in tissue fluids, a larger number of subjects will be required. Chetrite et al. (36) have shown that progestins inhibit sulfatase activity in the breast cancer cells. If this applies to the normal breast, the presence of medroxyprogesterone acetate in the HRT medication should increase the level of estrone sulfate in NAF by inhibiting its breakdown. This cannot explain the results obtained. We speculate that more of the estrone sulfate is being converted to estradiol in the breast of these women than in the postmenopausal women not taking HRT, thereby lowering the level of estrone sulfate in NAF. Another indication of the increased sulfatase activity is the apparently decreased level of DHEA sulfate and the increase in unconjugated DHEA in NAF of women on HRT.

The levels of EGF were not increased by the high levels of estradiol, and cathepsin D levels were unexplainably low. Although estrogen stimulates the transcription of cathepsin D mRNA, an effect of progesterone has not been demonstrated (37). Nevertheless, it is possible that medroxyprogesterone acetate in the HRT medication acts indirectly to suppress the effect of the elevated estradiol on cathepsin D by inhibiting the expression of the estrogen receptor. This would suggest that EGF is less dependent on estrogen for its expression in the breast than is cathepsin D. However, the number of observations in this group are small, and verification of this finding in a larger study is needed before any conclusions can be drawn.

It is concluded that: 1) potential precursors of estradiol, both androgens and estrone sulfate, remain at comparable levels in the breast after menopause; 2) local synthesis is important for maintenance of estradiol levels in NAF of postmenopausal women but less important for progesterone; 3) local synthesis of progesterone may be related to adiposity; and 4) correlations between serum and NAF concentrations of hormones measured simultaneously are weak but, with sufficient time changes in serum hormone levels, lead to similar changes in NAF. Considered as a whole, demonstration of similarities in response of hormone levels to menopause, OCs, and HRT in serum and NAF validate the physiological relevance of these NAF compounds as biomarkers. At the same time, differences in response such as the continued elevation of estrogens in NAF after menopause point to opportunities to use NAF biomarkers to improve understanding of the hormonal etiology of breast cancer. The relatively low success rate in obtaining NAF, particularly from postmenopausal women, is a limiting factor if analyses of NAF were to be used as a screening procedure. However, Sauter et al. (38) have developed a technique by which they have successfully obtained NAF in essentially all adult women.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Grants M01 RR-00048 from the National Center for Research Resources, P50 CA89018-01, K07 CA66185, and R01 CA66695-01 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Grant DAMD 17-94-5-4023, and the Carol Gollob Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

First Published Online November 30, 2004

Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CV, coefficient of variation; DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone; EGF, epidermal growth factor; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; NAF, nipple aspirate fluid; OC, oral contraceptive.

Received September 20, 2004.

Accepted November 22, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Chatterton Jr RT, Geiger AS, Khan SA, Helenowski IB, Jovanovic BD, Gann PH 2004 Variation in estradiol, estrogen precursors, and estrogen-related products in nipple aspirate fluid from normal premenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:928–935[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ernster VL, Wrensch MR, Petrakis NL, King EB, Miike R, Murai J, Goodson III WH, Siiteri PK 1987 Benign and malignant breast disease: initial study results of serum and breast fluid analyses of endogenous estrogens. J Natl Cancer Inst 79:949–960
  3. Rose DP 1992 Hormones and growth factors in nipple aspirates from normal women and benign breast disease patients. Cancer Detect Prev 16:43–51[Medline]
  4. Harding C, Osundeko O, Tetlow L, Faragher EB, Howell A, Bundred NJ 2000 Hormonally-regulated proteins in breast secretions are markers of target organ sensitivity. Br J Cancer 82:354–360[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Hargreaves DF, Potten CS, Harding C, Potten CS, Harding C, Shaw LE, Morton MS, Roberts SA, Howell A, Bundred NJ 1999 Two-week dietary soy supplementation has an estrogenic effect on normal premenopausal breast. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:4017–4024[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Chatterton Jr RT, Geiger AS, Helenowski IB, Gann PH 2004 Prediction of levels of estradiol and other proliferation markers in nipple aspirate fluid (NAF). Am Assoc Cancer Res (Abstract 5252)
  7. Gann PH, Chatterton Jr RT, Gapstur SM, Liu K, Garside D, Giovanazzi S, Thedford K, Van Horn L 2003 The effects of a low fat high fiber diet on sex hormone levels and menstrual cycling in premenopausal women: a 12-month randomized trial. Cancer 98:1870–1879[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Lu Y-C, Bentley GR, Gann PH, Hodges KR, Chatterton Jr RT 1999 Salivary estradiol and progesterone levels in conception and non-conception cycles in women. Evaluation of a new assay for salivary estradiol. Fertil Steril 71:863–868[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM 2000 Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer; 40–44
  10. Jovanovic BD, Viana MAG 1996 Upper confidence limits for binomial probability in safety evaluation. Proc Joint Statistical Meetings, American Statistical Association, 1996, pp 140–144
  11. Chatterton Jr RT, Geiger AS, Gann PH, Khan SA 2003 Formation of estrone and estradiol from estrone sulfate by normal breast parenchymal tissue. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 86:159–166[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Lobo RA, Stanczyk FZ 1994 New knowledge in the physiology of hormonal contraceptives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(Suppl):1499–1507
  13. Armeanu MC, Berkhout GM, Schoemaker J 1992 Pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in hypothalamic amenorrhea, anorexia nervosa, and polycystic ovarian disease during naltrexone treatment. Fertil Steril 57:762–770[Medline]
  14. Masamura S, Santner SJ, Gimotty P, George J, Santen RJ 1997 Mechanism for maintenance of high breast tumor estradiol concentrations in the absence of ovarian function: role of very high affinity tissue uptake. Breast Cancer Res Treat 42:215–226[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Bulun SE, Price TM, Aitken J, Mahendroo MS, Simpson ER 1993 A link between breast cancer and local estrogen biosynthesis suggested by quantification of breast adipose tissue aromatase cytochrome P450 transcripts using competitive polymerase chain reaction after reverse transcription. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1622–1628[Abstract]
  16. Pasqualini JR, Cortes-Prieto J, Chetrite G, Talbi M, Ruiz A 1997 Concentrations of estrone, estradiol and their sulfates, and evaluation of sulfatase and aromatase activities in patients with breast fibroadenoma. Int J Cancer 70:639–643[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Pizzagalli F, Hagenbuch B, Stieger B, Klenk U, Folkers G, Meier PJ 2002 Identification of a novel human organic anion transporting polypeptide as a high affinity thyroxine transporter. Mol Endocrinol 16:2283–2296[Free Full Text]
  18. Maeda Y, Tanaka E, Fujiwara M, Matsu T, Nakahara H, Nanba K, Higashi S, Setoguchi T 2002 Accumulation of 4- and 5-ene steroid sulfates in human breast cyst fluids. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 81:249–253[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Castagnetta L, Granata OM, Brignone G, Blasi L, Arcuri F, Mesiti M, D’Aquino A, Preitano W 1990 Steroid patterns of benign breast disease. Ann NY Acad Sci 586:121–136.[Abstract]
  20. Chetrite G, Pasqualini JR 1997 Steroid sulphotransferase and 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activities in Ishikawa human endometrial adenocarcinoma cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 61:27–34[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Killinger DW, Strutt BJ, Roncari DA, Khalil MW 1995 Estrone formation from dehydroepiandrosterone in cultured human breast adipose stromal cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 52:195–201[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Gann P, Chatterton R, Vogelsong K, Dupuis J, Ellman A 1997 Mitogenic growth factors in breast fluid obtained from healthy women: evaluation of biological and extraneous sources of variability. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6:421–428[Abstract]
  23. Cavailles V, Augereau P, Rochefort H 1993 Cathepsin D gene is controlled by a mixed promoter, and estrogens stimulate only TATA-dependent transcription in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:203–207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wang F, Porter W, Xing W, Archer TK, Safe S 1997 Identification of a functional imperfect estrogen-responsive element in the 5'-promoter region of the human cathepsin D gene. Biochemistry 36:7793–7801[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hunter DJ, Stampfer MJ, Speizer FE 1997 A prospective study of oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer (Nurse’s Health Study, United States). Cancer Causes Control 8:65–72[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Marchbanks PA, McDonald JA, Wilson HG, Folger SG, Mandel MG, Daling JR, Bernstein L, Malone KE, Ursin G, Strom BL, Norman SA, Weiss LK 2002 Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 346:2025–2032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sellers TA, Grabrick DM, Hartmann LC 2001 Oral contraceptives and risk of breast cancer in women with a family history of breast cancer. JAMA 285:39–40[Free Full Text]
  28. Miller WR, Scott WN, Kelly RW, Hawkins RA 1990 Steroid hormones in breast cyst fluids. Ann NY Acad Sci 586:60–69[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Belanger A, Labrie F 1990 Unconjugated and glucuronide steroid levels in human breast cyst fluid. Ann NY Acad Sci 586:93–99[Abstract]
  30. Gingras S, Moriggl R, Groner B, Simard J 1999 Induction of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/{delta}5-{delta}4 isomerase type 1 gene transcription in human breast cancer cell lines and in normal mammary epithelial cells by interleukin-4 and interleukin-13. Mol Endocrinol 13:66–81[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Pelletier G, Luu-The V, El Alfy M, Li S, Labrie F 2001 Immunoelectron microscopic localization of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and type 5 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in the human prostate and mammary gland. J Mol Endocrinol 26:11–19[Abstract]
  32. Daynes RA, Araneo BA, Ershler WB, Maloney C, Li GZ, Ryu SY 1993 Altered regulation of IL-6 production with normal aging. Possible linkage to the age-associated decline in dehydroepiandrosterone and its sulfated derivative. J Immunol 150:5219–5230[Abstract]
  33. Adams EF, Rafferty B, White MC 1991 Interleukin 6 is secreted by breast fibroblasts and stimulates 17ß-oestradiol oxidoreductase activity in MCF-7 cells: possible paracrine regulation of breast 17ß-oestradiol levels. Int J Cancer 49:118–121[Medline]
  34. Simpson ER, Zhao Y, Agarwal VR, Michael MD, Bulun SE, Hinshelwood MM, Graham-Lorence S, Sun T, Fisher CR, Qin K, Mendelson CR 1997 Aromatase expression in health and disease. Recent Prog Horm Res 52:185–213
  35. Reed MJ, Purohit A 1997 Breast cancer and the role of cytokines in regulating estrogen synthesis: an emerging hypothesis. Endocr Rev 18:701–715[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Chetrite GS, Ebert C, Wright F, Philippe AC, Pasqualini JR 1999 Control of sulfatase and sulfotransferase activities by medrogestone in the hormone-dependent MCF-7 and T-47D human breast cancer cell lines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 70:39–45[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Cavailles V, Garcia M, Rochefort H 1989 Regulation of cathepsin-D and pS2 gene expression by growth factors in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol 3:552–558[Abstract]
  38. Sauter ER, Ross E, Daly M, Klein-Szanto A, Engstrom PF, Sorling A, Malick J, Ehya H 1997 Nipple aspirate fluid: a promising non-invasive method to identify cellular markers of breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 76:494–501[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Huang, K. E. Anderson, M. Nagamani, J. J. Grady, and L.-J. W. Lu
Dietary Intake of Lactose as a Strong Predictor for Secretor Status of Nipple Aspirate Fluid in Healthy Premenopausal Nonlactating Women
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 14(5): 1386 - 1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. E. Cribb, M. J. Knight, D. Dryer, J. Guernsey, K. Hender, M. Tesch, and T. M. Saleh
Role of polymorphic human cytochrome p450 enzymes in estrone oxidation.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 551 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. S. Dua, C. M. Isacke, and G. P.H. Gui
The Intraductal Approach to Breast Cancer Biomarker Discovery
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2006; 24(7): 1209 - 1216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. H. Gann, A. S. Geiger, I. B. Helenowski, E. F. Vonesh, and R. T. Chatterton
Estrogen and Progesterone Levels in Nipple Aspirate Fluid of Healthy Premenopausal Women: Relationship to Steroid Precursors and Response Proteins
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 39 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
S A Khan, D Bhandare, and R T Chatterton Jr
The local hormonal environment and related biomarkers in the normal breast
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2005; 12(3): 497 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/3/1686    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chatterton, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Gann, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chatterton, R. T., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Gann, P. H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRONE
*PROGESTERONE
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals