help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2004-0374
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Attia, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Attia, G. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 3 1678-1685
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

The Orphan Nuclear Receptor, Liver Receptor Homolog-1, Regulates Cholesterol Side-Chain Cleavage Cytochrome P450 Enzyme in Human Granulosa Cells

Joung W. Kim, Jon C. Havelock, Bruce R. Carr and George R. Attia

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (J.C.H., B.R.C.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9032; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (J.W.K., G.R.A.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33136

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: George R. Attia, M.D., Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Cedars Medical Center, 1400 NW 12th Avenue, East Building 4th floor, Miami, Florida 33136. E-mail: gattia{at}med.miami.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
After ovulation, there is a shift in ovarian steroidogenesis from an estrogen-producing ovarian follicle to a progesterone-producing corpus luteum. The first step in human ovarian steroidogenesis is catalyzed by cholesterol side-chain cleavage cytochrome P450 (CYP11A1) enzyme. Steroidogenic factor-1 is an orphan nuclear receptor that regulates several steroidogenic enzymes, including CYP11A1. Liver receptor homolog-1 (LRH-1) is another orphan nuclear receptor that is expressed in the human ovary. After ovulation there is a down-regulation in steroidogenic factor-1, which is associated with an up-regulation of LRH-1 expression. These changes coincide with increased level of CYP11A1 expression in human corpus luteum. In this study, we examined the role of LRH-1 in the regulation of human granulosa cell CYP11A1 expression. Cotransfection of human granulosa cell tumor cells with CYP11A1 promoter and LRH-1 expression vector resulted in a significant increase in CYP11A1 expression. Deletion analysis revealed two putative LRH-1 binding sites at –1580 and –40, which was confirmed by EMSA. Dosage-sensitive sex-reversal-adrenal hypoplasia congenita critical region on the X chromosome, gene-1 inhibited LRH-1 stimulated CYP11A1 expression, and that was not overcome by the presence of PKA agonist. We conclude that CYP11A1 expression in human granulosa cells is regulated by LRH-1. We propose that LRH-1 could be the major transcription factor for the post-ovulatory surge in human ovarian steroidogenesis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OVARIAN STEROIDOGENESIS IS determined by the spatiotemporal expression of various steroidogenic enzymes (1, 2, 3). The first and rate-limiting step in this process is catalyzed by cholesterol side-chain cleavage cytochrome P450 (CYP11A1) (4, 5). CYP11A1 is an enzyme located in the inner mitochondrial membrane and expressed in the adrenals, gonads, placenta, and brain (6). This enzyme catalyzes the conversion of cholesterol to pregnenolone (7, 8). Ovarian CYP11A1 gene expression is stimulated by pituitary gonadotropins through a G protein-coupled receptor at the cell surface (9). Stimulation of this receptor results in the increase of intracellular cAMP. Acting as a second messenger for intracellular signaling, cAMP is responsible for the increased expression of the CYP11A1 gene (10, 11).

Luteal steroidogenesis is required for endometrial receptivity and maintenance of the early pregnancy. Although LH is essential for corpus luteum development, regression of the corpus luteum is not due to changes in LH pulsatility (12). This suggests that the actions of LH, and the maintenance of the corpus luteum, are due to intraluteal factors. Whereas luteal cell steroidogenesis is modified by growth factors, hormones, and cytokines (13), alterations in gene expression in the ovary are thought to be a major mechanism controlling the shift in ovarian steroidogenesis from a preovulatory follicle, predominantly producing estrogen, to a predominantly progesterone-producing corpus luteum (14, 15). CYP11A1 is one of three enzymes essential for progesterone synthesis, and increased expression is demonstrated in the corpus luteum (2, 3, 16).

Orphan nuclear receptors are a group of transcription factors for which a ligand has not been identified (17). Of these factors, steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1/NR5A1) has been found to be a global regulator of endocrine development and function (14, 18, 19) and is a transcriptional regulator of several steroidogenic enzymes critical for reproductive function (20, 21, 22, 23, 24). Another orphan nuclear receptor, dosage-sensitive sex-reversal-adrenal hypoplasia congenita critical region on the X chromosome, gene 1 (DAX-1/NR0B1), colocalizes with SF-1 in steroidogenic tissues and represses the transcription of several genes encoding steroidogenic enzymes, including CYP11A1 (25).

Although SF-1 mRNA has been detected throughout the ovary, the highest levels have been detected in the theca and interstitial regions (21, 26). Furthermore, SF-1 is not expressed in the corpus luteum during pregnancy in mouse ovaries (27) and is transiently repressed in the periovulatory period (28). In contrast, CYP11A1 levels are greatly increased in the corpus luteum (2, 16, 28). This suggests that CYP11A1 expression during the periovulatory period and luteal phase may be under the regulation of transcription factors other than SF-1. Another member of the orphan nuclear receptor family is liver receptor homolog-1 (LRH-1/NR5A2). LRH-1 has been found to be expressed in multiple tissues (29, 30, 31). Recently LRH-1 expression has been demonstrated in the murine (27), equine (32), and adult human ovaries (33), suggesting that LRH-1 may play a role in ovarian steroidogenesis. LRH-1 and SF-1 share a high degree of structural similarity within the regions referred to as the hybrid P box, the A box, and the T box and are 60% homologous in their amino acid sequences. These regions are directly implicated in recognition and interaction with the canonical recognition motif for Drosophila fushi tarazu factor-1 receptors (34, 35). LRH-1 transcripts are abundant in granulosa cells and corpora lutea and absent from theca and interstitial cells (27, 36). This expression demonstrates a unique spatial and temporal expression of LRH-1 in the ovary that is distinct from SF-1 expression. To determine the role of LRH-1 in CYP11A1 regulation in the ovary, we examined the effect of LRH-1 and DAX-1 in the regulation of the CYP11A1 promoter in human granulosa cells. We also examined the effect of protein kinase A (PKA) signaling pathways on the expression of CYP11A1 in the presence of LRH-1 and DAX-1.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell isolation and culture

Human granulosa cell tumor (HGCT) cells were isolated from a patient undergoing surgical removal of ovarian granulosa cell tumor as previously described (37). The use of ovarian tissue was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas. To obtain granulosa cell tumor cells, a portion of the tumor was dispersed into single cells using constant gentle agitation in 0.025% trypsin in DMEM and Ham’s F-12 (F-12) (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) and antibiotics (37 C, 30 min x 8). After each time point, the cell suspension was collected, pooled, and 5% Nuserum (Becton Dickinson, Mansfield, MA) added to inactivate the trypsin. HGCT cells were pelleted and resuspended in DMEM/F-12 medium. This cell model is able to reproduce many of the differentiated functions of granulosa cells. Specifically they have maintained the production of progesterone and are able to convert androstenedione to estradiol. This cell model also responds to forskolin and dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP) by increasing production of progesterone and estradiol (data not shown). Cells were routinely subcultured using 0.05% trypsin and replated at a 1:3 split. All the experiments described in this study were conducted using cells in culture for 2–8 wk.

Human luteinized granulosa cells (HLGCs) were obtained by follicular aspiration from women undergoing oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization. Briefly, women were treated with GnRH agonist before and during follicular stimulation using recombinant human gonadotropin. After follicular aspiration, HLGCs were isolated as previously described (38). HLGCs were washed twice with (DMEM/F12) medium (Gibco) and then incubated for 30 min at 37 C in DMEM/F-12 containing 0.1% hyaluronidase to disperse HLGCs. The dispersed cells were resuspended in 20 ml medium and transferred to 50-ml tubes containing 3.5 ml Histopaque 1077 (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). HLGCs were separated from red blood cells by centrifugation at 600 x g for 15 min. HLGCs formed a thin layer between the Histopaque and the medium. Cells were removed, washed three times using DMEM/F-12 containing 5% fetal bovine serum; 1% ITS Plus (Collaborative Research, Waltham, MA); 2% Ultroser G (IBF Biotechnics, Sepracor, Inc., Marlborough, MA); and antibiotics. The isolated cells were used to prepare nuclear extracts.

CYP11A1-luciferase and expression vector constructs

A transient expression system using the luciferase reporter gene was used to characterize the human CYP11A1 promoter. A 4.4-kb fragment extending from position –4400 to + 63 was kindly provided by Bon-chu Chung (Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China). A 2.3-kb fragment extending from position –2298 to + 63 was cloned into a pGL-3 basic luciferase reporter plasmid at the HindIII site (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). Six deletion vectors were produced by appropriate enzyme digestion of pGL3-CYP11A1 vector (–2298 to +63): pGL3-CYP11A1 (–1850 to +63) was produced by XhoI and StuI digestion of –2.3 kb promoter fragment; pGL3-CYP11A1 (–1680 to +63) was produced by XhoI and SpeI digestion of –2.3 kb promoter fragment; pGL3-CYP11A1 (–1050 to +63) was produced by XhoI and DraI digestion of –2.3 kb promoter fragment; pGL3-CYP11A1 (–580 to +63) was produced by XhoI and PvuII digestion of –2.3 kb promoter fragment; pGL3-CYP11A1 (–340 to +63) was produced by XhoI and ApaI digestion of –2.3 kb promoter fragment; and pGL3-CYP11A1 (+50 to +63) was produced by XhoI and PvuII digestion of –2.3 kb promoter fragment.

The mutation vector (at the position of –1581/–1587) was produced by PCR amplification of pGL3-CYP11A1 (–2298/+63) vector using the following primers (for the –1581/–1587 mutants): 5'-ATTCCAGGCTCGAATTCATCATGGA-3' and 5'-TCCATGATGAATTCGAGCCTGGA-AT-3'. For the –1581/–1587 mutants, the sequence 5'-CAAGGTC-3' (–1581/–1587) was changed to 5'-CgAatTC-3', which included an EcoRI site. The pGL3-CYP11A1 construct (2.3 kb) was used as the template for PCR. The coding region of LRH-1 (provided by Dr. David Mangelsdorf, University of Texas Southwestern) was inserted into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) eukaryotic expression vector.

Transient transfections and reporter assays

Twenty-four hours before transfection, HGCT cells were subcultured onto 12-well plates at a density of 80,000 cells/well. Fugene 6 (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) was used to transfect 0.5 µg of reporter plasmid and the indicated amounts of expression vectors. pcDNA3 empty vector was used to assure constant amounts of DNA per well for each transfection. After transfection, cells were incubated for 18 h before being treated with the agonists for 6 h in low-serum medium (DMEM/F-12 containing 0.1% Ultroser G), when indicated. Cells were assayed for reporter activity using the luciferase assay system (Promega). The ß-galactosidase enzyme assay system (Promega) was used as a positive control vector in determining transfection efficiency in earlier experiments. Because transfection efficiency was determined to be similar between the two reporter assays, additional experiments were conducted using the luciferase assay system.

Nuclear extraction and EMSA

Nuclear extract (NE) was prepared from confluent HGCT cells and HLGCs as previously described (39). Human LRH-1 was in vitro transcribed/translated using the TNT-coupled reticulocyte lysate systems following the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). Human CYP11A1 oligonucleotide probes were designed at position –1597/–1573 and position –50/–25 (Table 1Go). These oligonucleotides were annealed at 85 C for 5 min in annealing buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2 (pH 8.0)] and then slowly cooled to room temperature. The annealed oligonucleotide was end labeled with [{gamma}32P]dATP 3000 Ci/mM (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Invitrogen) at 37 C for 30 min. Five micrograms of NE or 5 µl of the in vitro LRH-1 protein were incubated with 30,000 cpm-labeled probe at 37 C for 30 min in 20 µl binding buffer [20 mM HEPES (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 50 mM KCl, 1 µg poly-dI.dC/dI.dC, 1 mg/ml BSA, 10 mM dithiothreitol]. The DNA-protein complexes were separated from free probe by electrophoresis using 4.5% polyacrylamide gel for 2 h at 150 V. The gel was dried and visualized after autoradiography at –70 C for 24 h.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotide sequences used as probes for EMSAs

 
Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by ANOVA using STATPAC software (Minneapolis, MN).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
LRH-1 stimulates CYP11A1 promoter activity in human granulosa cells

To examine the role of LRH-1 in the regulation of CYP11A1 gene expression, HGCT cells were cotransfected with LRH-1 expression vectors and CYP11A1 promoter construct. LRH-1 increased the activity of CYP11A1 promoter construct by 25-fold (Fig. 1Go). Previous studies demonstrated two putative SF-1 binding cis elements, (–1580 and –40) (20). To define the cis elements in the CYP11A1 promoter needed for LRH-1 transactivation, deletion analysis of the CYP11A1 promoter was performed. HGCT cells were cotransfected with LRH-1 expression vector and multiple deletion constructs of CYP11A1 promoter. LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 promoter activity was markedly decreased using the –1050 construct. In addition, the luciferase activity was comparable with basal level in +50 construct (Fig. 2Go). Sequence analysis of the –1680 construct and –340 construct revealed a putative SF-1 binding site between –1587 to –1581 and –42 to –35. Mutation of the upstream site from 5'-CAAGGTC-3' to 5'-CgAatTC-3' reduced the LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 promoter activity by 50% (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Effect of LRH-1 on the CYP11A1 promoter activity. HGCT cells were cotransfected with luciferase reporter construct containing CYP11A1 promoter (0.5 µg/well) and LRH-1 expression vector (0.5 µg/well). After recovery for 18 h, cells were lysed and assayed for luciferase activity. LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 promoter activity was significantly different from basal (*, P < 0.005). Data are expressed as a percentage of the basal (CYP11A1 promoter construct plus empty pcDNA3.1 vector), which is set at 100%, and graphed as the mean ± SE values for the relative luciferase activity of pooled data from three experiments.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Deletion analysis of CYP11A1 promoter construct. HGCT cells were cotransfected with sequentially deleted CYP11A1 promoter construct (0.5 µg/well) and LRH-1 expression vector (0.5 µg/well). After recovery for 18 h, cells were lysed and luciferase (Luc) assay was performed. LRH-1 increased CYP11A1 promoter activity by 33-fold, compared with basal. This activity was significantly diminished to basal activity using –1050 to +63 constructs (*, P < 0.05; **P < 0.005). Data are expressed as a percentage of the basal (CYP11A1 promoter construct plus empty pcDNA3.1 vector), which is set at 100%, and graphed as the mean ± SE values for the relative luciferase activity of pooled data from three experiments.

 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Mutation analysis of CYP11A1 promoter construct. Site-directed mutation of CYP11A1 promoter was performed using PCRs. HGCT cells were cotransfected with mutated CYP11A1 promoter construct (0.5 µg/well) and LRH-1 expression vector (0.5 µg/well). After recovery for 18 h, cells were lysed and luciferase (Luc) activity was assayed. LRH-1 significantly induced CYP11A1 promoter activity by 33-fold, compared with basal (*, P < 0.005). This activity was significantly decreased using construct mutated at position –1581/–1587, compared with the wild type (**, P < 0.05). Data are expressed as a percentage of the basal (CYP11A1 promoter construct plus empty pcDNA3.1 vector), which is set at 100% and graphed as the mean ± SE values for the relative luciferase activity of pooled data from three experiments. Promoter activity of mutated CYP11A1 promoter construct plus empty pcDNA3.1 vector was not different from basal (one experiment, data not shown).

 
DAX-1 inhibits the LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 promoter activity

To examine the correlation of LRH-1 and DAX-1 on the regulation of steroidogenic enzyme expression, we examined the effect of DAX-1 on LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 promoter activity. HGCT cells were cotransfected with CYP11A1 promoter construct, LRH-1 expression vector, and increasing doses of DAX-1 expression vector. LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 activity was inhibited by DAX-1 in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Effect of DAX-1 on the LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 promoter activity. HGCT cells were cotransfected with CYP11A1 promoter construct (0.5 µg/well), LRH-1 (0.5 µg/well), and increasing concentrations (0.001–0.5 µg) of DAX-1 expression vector. DAX-1 inhibited LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 activity in a dose-dependent manner, compared with LRH-1-only-induced CYP11A1 activity (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005), with maximal inhibition obtained at concentration of 0.05 µg/well. Data are expressed as a percentage of control (CYP11A1 promoter construct plus empty pcDNA3.1 vector), which is set at 100%, and graphed as the mean ± SE values for the relative luciferase activity of pooled data from three to four experiments.

 
cAMP augments LRH-1 stimulated CYP11A1 promoter activity

To determine whether LRH-1-enhanced CYP11A1 promoter activity was influenced by PKA, transfected cells were treated with the cAMP analog, dbcAMP. In the absence of LRH-1, dbcAMP had no effect on CYP11A1 reporter activity, compared with control. However, this activity was enhanced in the presence of LRH-1 (Fig. 5Go). This inhibition of CYP11A1 by DAX-1 was not overcome by the presence of the PKA pathway agonist dbcAMP (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Effect of PKA agonists on the LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 promoter activity. CYP11A1 promoter construct (0.5 µg/well) was cotransfected with LRH-1 expression vector (0.5 µg/well) and DAX-1 expression vector (0.5 µg/well) into HGCT cells. In some experiments, after recovery for 18 h, cells were treated with dbcAMP (100 µM) for 6 h. Cells were then lysed and luciferase activity was assayed. Treatment with dbcAMP had no effects on the basal CYP11A1 promoter activity, but LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 promoter activity was further enhanced in the presence of dbcAMP treatment (*, P < 0.05). DAX-1 inhibited LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 activity, and this inhibition was maintained in the presence of PKA agonist dbcAMP. Data are expressed as a percentage of the basal (CYP11A1 promoter construct plus empty pcDNA3.1 vector), which is set at 100%, and graphed as the mean ± SE values for the relative luciferase activity of pooled data from three experiments.

 
EMSA

To confirm that LRH-1 interacts directly with the two putative response element sites, wild- or mutant-type synthetic oligonucleotides encompassing the cis elements [–1597 to –1573 (Fig. 6AGo) and –50 to –25 (Fig. 6BGo)] were generated and used for EMSA. In vitro-transcribed LRH-1 proteins bound to the radiolabeled oligonucleotides and formed a specific protein/DNA complex that was completely displaced by addition of 100-fold molar excess of nonradiolabeled oligonucleotides. In addition, when the radiolabeled oligonucleotide probe was incubated with HLGCs and HGCT NEs, a similar protein/DNA complex was formed. This complex was displaced by excess nonradiolabeled oligonucleotides but not by mutant-type oligonucleotides.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. LRH-1 binds to putative cis element in the CYP11A1 promoter in EMSA. The labeled oligonucleotides [–1597/–1573 (A) and –50/–25 (B)] were incubated with an increasing amount of HGCT cells NE (1–5 µg), HLGC NE (5 µg), and in vitro-transcribed LRH-1 protein (5 µl). The resulting protein/DNA complexes (shown by arrows) were separated from the free probe by electrophoresis. A, The intensity of complex 1 (C1) band increased as the concentration of NEs increased. This band was completely displaced by the addition of 100-fold molar excess of nonradiolabeled DNA (cold probe). The same result was obtained using both HLGC NE and in vitro-transcribed LRH-1 protein. Similar results were obtained in two additional independent experiments. B, The intensity of complex 1 (C1) band increased as the concentration of NEs increased. This band was completely displaced by the addition of 100-fold molar excess of nonradiolabeled DNA (cold probe). The same result was obtained using both HLGC NE and in vitro-transcribed LRH-1 protein. Similar results were obtained in two additional independent experiments. Wt, Wild type; Mt, mutant type.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ovarian steroidogenesis demonstrates a spatial and temporal pattern of gene expression. A significant increase in steroidogenesis occurs after ovulation, with a shift toward progesterone synthesis by the postovulatory corpus luteum. The human corpus luteum produces up to 40 mg progesterone daily, up to a 40-fold increase from the follicular phase (15). The mechanisms controlling this shift in steroidogenesis remain poorly understood. We previously demonstrated a higher level of LRH-1 in the human corpus luteum, compared with SF-1 (41). This is consistent with previous reports of significant LRH-1 expression in murine, equine, and human ovaries (31, 32, 33). This study demonstrates that LRH-1 up-regulates CYP11A1 gene expression in a concentration-dependent manner in human ovarian granulosa cells.

The corpus luteum is a heterogeneous population of cells, with small and large luteal cells, fibroblasts, endothelial, and immune cells. Only 30% of these cells are steroidogenic (42). Within the steroidogenic cell population are the theca-derived small luteal cells and granulosa-derived large luteal cells (43). The granulosa-derived large luteal cells are responsible for the predominant production of progesterone in the corpus luteum (44). Whereas the theca-derived small luteal cells serve an important role in corpus luteum steroidogenesis by providing androgen precursors for estrogen biosynthesis, it is apparent that the cells derived from the granulosa cell population are essential for progesterone production.

Development of the corpus luteum is under the control of the preovulatory surge of gonadotropins. The LH surge induces ovulation and differentiation of the residual follicular cells that form the corpus luteum and begin to produce significant quantities of progesterone. Whereas the corpus luteum undergoes profound tissue growth and cellular proliferation, the profound increase in progesterone synthetic capability or specificity is not simply due to expansion of cell mass or volume alone.

SF-1 is a transcriptional regulator of steroidogenic enzymes essential for reproductive function, including CYP11A1 (20, 22). In contrast, whereas CYP11A1 expression is increased in the corpus luteum, SF-1 expression is significantly decreased (27, 28, 45). This suggests that other factors may regulate ovarian steroidogenesis in the corpus luteum. Because LRH-1 is abundant in human granulosa cells and LRH-1 shares the same putative binding sites as SF-1, we, therefore, hypothesize that the expression of CYP11A1 in corpus luteum could be regulated by LRH-1.

In this study, CYP11A1 gene expression in human ovarian granulosa cells is up-regulated through induction of promoter activity by LRH-1. For this study, we used HGCT cells for our experiments. These cells share significant similarity to granulosa cells as evidenced by the ability of this cell to reproduce many of the differentiated functions of granulosa cells. Specifically, they have maintained the production of progesterone and are able to convert androstenedione to estradiol. This cell model also responds to forskolin and dbcAMP by increasing production of progesterone and estradiol. In addition, HGCT cells have continued to express steroid-metabolizing enzymes that are under the control of cAMP. We previously performed a Western blot analysis for LRH-1 in the HGCT model, demonstrating low LRH-1 expression in nontransfected HGCT cells (data not shown). To validate the use of this cell model as a representative to granulosa cells, we used nuclear extract from human luteinized granulosa cells and compared its binding activity with that of the HGCT model. As shown in Fig. 6Go, there is a similar binding pattern between these two cell models. Furthermore, the density of the band obtained from these two NEs was of the same density, which would argue for comparable expression of LRH-1 in both the HGCT model and the human luteinized granulosa cells. In these EMSAs using in vitro-transcribed/translated LRH-1, there was evidence of two specific complexes with both the upstream and proximal probes. This has also been observed with the mouse LRH-1 and may be due to splice variants or the result of multiple initiation start sites (27). These complexes do appear to be specific because they competed with an excess of nonradiolabeled probe.

Previous studies demonstrated two putative SF-1 binding sites in the CYP11A1 promoter region (46, 47) that are located at the upstream (–1580) and proximal (–40) regions. Through site-directed mutagenesis, a previous study examining the regulatory role of these two SF-1 binding sites revealed that the proximal site was important for basal CYP11A1 gene expression, whereas the upstream site was located in the cAMP-responsive region of the promoter and was important for hormonal response through adenylate cyclase activity (22). In this study, through deletion analysis of the CYP11A1 promoter construct, loss of the upstream segment revealed a significant decrease in LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 expression, whereas loss of both binding sites resulted in LRH-1-induced CYP11A1 expression equivalent to basal levels of the wild-type promoter construct. Site-directed mutagenesis of the upstream putative LRH-1 binding site revealed a similar reduction in activity, indicating that LRH-1 regulation of CYP11A1 promoter activity in human ovarian granulosa cells functions through the same mechanism as SF-1. EMSA confirmed the LRH-1 interaction with the putative binding sites.

DAX-1 has previously been demonstrated to block steroidogenesis at multiple levels, including inhibition of CYP11A1 synthesis in the presence or absence of a PKA agonist (48). DAX-1 has been shown to repress SF-1-mediated transcriptional activity (49, 50). In the present study, DAX-1 inhibited LRH-1 stimulated CYP11A1 in a dose-dependent manner. This inhibition was maintained in the presence of a PKA agonist. This inhibition may be mediated through direct interaction of LRH-1 with DAX-1 (51).

It is unlikely that SF-1 and LRH-1 are redundant transcriptional regulators within the ovary. There appears to be differential regulation of gonadogenesis and gonadal steroidogenesis by SF-1 and LRH-1. The fact that SF-1 knockout mice fail to develop gonads suggests a lack of expression or regulatory function of LRH-1 in the developing gonad and again demonstrates the importance of the temporal expression of these transcriptional regulators (14, 41). Furthermore, corpus luteum steroidogenesis in rodents is under control of estradiol and prolactin (52), and androgen biosynthesis in rodents occurs using progesterone and 17-hydroxyprogesterone as precursors instead of pregnenolone and 17-hydroxypregnenolone, suggesting that the regulation of ovarian steroidogenesis is species dependent and may not accurately reflect in vivo progesterone biosynthesis in humans. The role of these orphan receptors in gonadogenesis and gonadal steroidogenesis will be further elucidated with the development of ovary-specific SF-1, LRH-1, and double-knockout animal models.

In conjunction with our previous finding of greater LRH-1 expression in the human corpus luteum, compared with SF-1 (41), along with increased CYP11A1 expression in human granulosa cells in the presence of LRH-1, the regulation of CYP11A1 in the corpus luteum appears to be under the control of LRH-1. In addition, with our previous findings of LRH-1 regulation of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (41) and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (40), transcriptional regulation of the enzymes necessary for progesterone biosynthesis in the corpus luteum appears to be under the control of LRH-1.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank W. E. Rainey for technical assistance and D. J. Mangelsdorf for gifts of material.


    Footnotes
 
First Published Online December 21, 2004

Abbreviations: CYP11A1, Cholesterol side-chain cleavage cytochrome P450; DAX-1, dosage-sensitive sex-reversal-adrenal hypoplasia congenita critical region on the X chromosome, gene 1; dbcAMP, dibutyryl cAMP; F-12, Ham’s F-12; HGCT, human granulosa cell tumor; HLGC, human luteinized granulosa cell; LRH-1, liver receptor homolog-1; NE, nuclear extract; PKA, protein kinase A; SF-1, steroidogenic factor-1.

Received February 25, 2004.

Accepted December 9, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Suzuki T, Sasano H, Tamura M, Aoki H, Fukaya T, Yajima A, Nagura H, Mason JI 1993 Temporal and spatial localization of steroidogenic enzymes in premenopausal human ovaries: in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical study. Mol Cell Endocrinol 97:135–143[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Doody KJ, Lorence MC, Mason JI, Simpson ER 1990 Expression of messenger ribonucleic acid species encoding steroidogenic enzymes in human follicles and corpora lutea throughout the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:1041–1045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ronen-Fuhrmann T, Timberg R, King SR, Hales KH, Hales DB, Stocco DM, Orly J 1998 Spatio-temporal expression patterns of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) during follicular development in the rat ovary. Endocrinology 139:303–315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hall PF 1986 Cytochromes P-450 and the regulation of steroid synthesis. Steroids 48:133–196
  5. Miller WL 1988 Molecular biology of steroid hormone synthesis. Endocr Rev 9:295–318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Chung BC, Guo IC, Chou SJ 1997 Transcriptional regulation of the CYP11A1 and ferredoxin genes. Steroids 62:37–42[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Hanukoglu I, Spitsberg V, Bumpus JA, Dus KM, Jefcoate CR 1981 Adrenal mitochondrial cytochrome P-450scc. Cholesterol and adrenodoxin interactions at equilibrium and during turnover. J Biol Chem 256:4321–4328[Free Full Text]
  8. Lambeth JD, Pember SO 1983 Cytochrome P-450scc-adrenodoxin complex. Reduction properties of the substrate-associated cytochrome and relation of the reduction states of heme and iron-sulfur centers to association of the proteins. J Biol Chem 258:5596–5602[Free Full Text]
  9. Richards JS 1994 Hormonal control of gene expression in the ovary. Endocr Rev 15:725–751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kramer RE, Rainey WE, Funkenstein B, Dee A, Simpson ER, Waterman ER 1984 Induction of synthesis of mitochondrial steroidogenic enzymes of bovine adrenocortical cells by analogs of cyclic AMP. J Biol Chem 259:707–713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Chau YM, Crawford PA, Woodson KG, Polish JA, Olson LM, Sadovsky Y 1997 Role of steroidogenic-factor 1 in basal and 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate-mediated regulation of cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage enzyme in the mouse. Biol Reprod 57:765–771[Abstract]
  12. Hutchison JS, Nelson PB, Zeleznik AJ 1986 Effects of different gonadotropin pulse frequencies on corpus luteum function during the menstrual cycle of rhesus monkeys. Endocrinology 119:1964–1971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Richards JS, Russell DL, Ochsner S, Hsieh M, Doyle KH, Falender AE, Lo YK, Sharma SC 1997 Novel signaling pathways that control ovarian follicular development, ovulation, and luteinization. Recent Prog Horm Res 57:195–220
  14. Parker KL, Schimmer BP 1997 Steroidogenic factor 1: a key determinant of endocrine development and function. Endocr Rev 18:361–377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Devoto L, Kohen P, Vega M, Castro O, Gonzàlez RR, Retamales I, Carvallo P, Christenson LK, Strauss III JF 2002 Control of human luteal steroidogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 186:137–141[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Zlotkin T, Farkash Y, Orly J 1986 Cell-specific expression of immunoreactive cholesterol side-chain cleavage cytochrome P-450 during follicular development in the ovary. Endocrinology 119:2809–2820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Enmark E, Gustafsson J-A 1996 Orphan nuclear receptors—the first eight years. Mol Endocrinol 10:1293–1307[Free Full Text]
  18. Luo X, Ikeda Y, Parker KL 1994 A cell-specific nuclear receptor is essential for adrenal and gonadal development and sexual differentiation. Cell 77:481–490[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Ingraham HA, Lala DS, Ikeda Y, Luo X, Shen W, Nachtigal MW, Abbud R, Nilson JH, Parker KL 1994 The nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1 acts at multiple levels of the reproductive axis. Genes Dev 8:2302–2312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Clemens JW, Lala DS, Parker KL, Richards JS 1994 Steroidogenic factor-1 binding and transcriptional activity of the cholesterol side-chain cleavage promoter in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 134:1499–1508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ikeda Y, Lala DS, Luo X, Kim E, Moisan M, Parker KL 1993 Characterization of the mouse FTZ-F1 gene, which encodes a key regulator of steroid hydroxylase gene expression. Mol Endocrinol 7:852–860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Hu MC, Hsu NC, Pai CI, Wang CK, Chung BC 2001 Functions of the upstream and proximal steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1)-binding sites in the CYP11A1 promoter in basal transcription and hormonal response. Mol Endocrinol 15:812–818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Sugawara T, Kiriakidou M, McAllister JM, Kallen CB, Strauss III JF 1997 Multiple steroidogenic factor 1 binding elements in the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene 5'-flanking region are required for maximal promoter activity and cyclic AMP responsiveness. Biochemistry 36:7249–7255[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Lynch JP, Lala DS, Peluso JJ, Luo W, Parker KL, White BA 1993 Steroidogenic factor 1, an orphan nuclear receptor, regulates the expression of the rat aromatase gene in gonadal tissues. Mol Endocrinol 7:776–786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Ikeda Y, Swain A, Weber TJ, Hentges KE, Zanaria E, Lalli E, Tamai KT, Sassone-Corsi P, Lovell-Badge R, Camerino G, Parker KL 1996 Steroidogenic factor 1 and Dax-1 colocalize in multiple cell lineages: potential links in endocrine development. Mol Endocrinol 10:1261–1272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Morohashi K, Iida H, Nomura M, Hatano O, Honda S, Tsukiyama T, Niwa O, Hara T, Takakusu A, Shibata Y 1994 Functional difference between Ad4BP and ELP, and their distributions in steroidogenic tissues. Mol Endocrinol 8:643–653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Hinshelwood MM, Repa JJ, Shelton JM, Richardson JA, Mangelsdorf DJ, Mendelson CR 2003 Expression of LRH-1 and SF-1 in the mouse ovary: localization in different cell types correlates with differing function. Mol Cell Endocrinol 207:39–45[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Agarwal P, Peluso JJ, White BA 1996 Steroidogenic factor-1 is transiently repressed and c-myc expression and deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis are induced in rat granulosa cells during the periovulatory period. Biol Reprod 55:1271–1275[Abstract]
  29. Galarneau L, Paré J, Allard D, Hamel D, Lévesque L, Tugwood JD, Green S, Bélanger L 1996 The {alpha}1-fetoprotein locus is activated by a nuclear receptor of the DrosophilaFTZ-F1 family. Mol Cell Biol 16:3853–3865[Abstract]
  30. Nitta M, Ku S, Brown C, Okamoto AY, Shan B 1999 CPF: an orphan nuclear receptor that regulates liver-specific expression of the human cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:6660–6665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Repa JJ, Mangelsdorf DJ 1999 Nuclear receptor regulation of cholesterol and bile acid metabolism. Curr Opin Biotechnol 10:557–563[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Boerboom D, Pilon S, Behdjani R, Silversides DW, Sirois J 2000 Expression and regulation of transcripts encoding two members of the NR5A nuclear receptor subfamily of orphan nuclear receptors, steroidogenic-factor-1 and NR5A2, in equine ovarian cells during the ovulatory process. Endocrinology 141:4647–4656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sirianni R, Seely JB, Attia G, Stocco DM, Carr BR, Pezzi V, Rainey WE 2002 Liver receptor homologue-1 is expressed in human steroidogenic tissues and activates transcription of genes encoding steroidogenic enzymes. J Endocrinol 174:R13–R17
  34. Li M, Xie YH, Kong YY, Wu X, Zhu L, Wang Y 1998 Cloning and characterization of a novel human hepatocyte transcription factor, h1BF, which binds and activates enhancer II of hepatitis B virus. J Biol Chem 273:29022–29031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H, Hihi AK, Laudet V, Keller H, Wahli W, Dreyer C 1994 FTZ-F1-related orphan receptors in Xenopus laevis: transcriptional regulators differentially expressed during early embryogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 14:2786–2797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Liu DL, Liu WZ, Li QL, Wang HM, Qian D, Treuter E, Zhu C 2003 Expression and functional analysis of liver receptor homologue 1 as a potential steroidogenic factor in rat ovary. Biol Reprod 69:508–517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Rainey WE, Sawetawan C, McCarthy JL, McGee EA, Bird IM, Word RA, Carr BR 1996 Human ovarian tumor cells: a potential model for thecal cell steroidogenesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:257–263[Abstract]
  38. Rainey WE, Bird IM, Byrd W, Carr BR 1993 Effect of angiotensin II on human luteinized granulosa cells. Fertil Steril 59:143–147[Medline]
  39. Wang XL, Bassett M, Zhang Y, Yin S, Clyne C, White PC, Rainey WE 2000 Transcriptional regulation of human 11ß-hydroxylase (hCYP11B1). Endocrinology 141:3587–3594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Kim JW, Peng N, Rainey WE, Carr BR, Attia GR 2004 Liver receptor homolog-1 regulates the expression of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in human granulosa cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:3042–3047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Peng N, Kim JW, Rainey WE, Carr BR, Attia GR 2003 The role of the orphan nuclear receptor, liver receptor homologue-1, in the regulation of human corpus luteum 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:6020–6028[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Devoto L, Vega M, Kohen P, Castro A, Castro O, Christenson LK, Carvallo P, Strauss 3rd JF 2000 Endocrine and paracrine-autocrine regulation of the human corpus luteum during the mid-luteal phase. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 55:13–20[Medline]
  43. Sanders SL, Stouffer RL 1997 Localization of steroidogenic enzymes in macaque luteal tissue during the menstrual cycle and simulated early pregnancy: immunohistochemical evidence supporting the two-cell model for estrogen production in the primate corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 56:1077–1087[Abstract]
  44. Wiltbank MC, Belfiore CJ, Niswender GD 1993 Steroidogenic enzyme activity after acute activation of protein kinase (PK) A and PKC in ovine small and large luteal cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 97:1–7[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Falender AE, Lanz R, Malenfant D, Belanger L, Richards JS 2003 Differential expression of steroidogenic factor-1 and FTF/LRH-1 in the rodent ovary. Endocrinology 144:3598–3610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Watanabe N, Inoue H, Fujii-Kuriyama Y 1994 Regulatory mechanisms of cAMP-dependent and cell-specific expression of human steroidogenic cytochrome P450scc (CYP11A1) gene. Eur J Biochem 222:825–834[Medline]
  47. Takayama K, Morohashi K, Honda S, Hara N, Omura T 1994 Contribution of Ad4BP, a steroidogenic cell-specific transcription factor, to regulation of the human CYP11A and bovine CYP11B genes through their distal promoters. J Biochem (Tokyo) 116:193–203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Lalli E, Melner MH, Stocco DM, Sassone-Corsi P 1998 DAX-1 blocks steroid production at multiple levels. Endocrinology 139:4237–4243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Zazopoulos E, Lalli E, Stocco DM, Sassone-Corsi P 1997 DNA binding and transcriptional repression by DAX-1 blocks steroidogenesis. Nature 390:311–315[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Ito M, Yu R, Jameson JL 1997 DAX-1 inhibits SF-1-mediated transactivation via a carboxy-terminal domain that is deleted in adrenal hypoplasia congenita. Mol Cell Biol 17:1476–1483[Abstract]
  51. Suzuki T, Kasahara M, Yoshioka H, Morohashi K, Umesono K 2002 LXXLL-related motifs in Dax-1 have target specificity for the orphan nuclear receptors Ad4BP/SF-1 and LRH-1. Mol Cell Biol 23:238–249
  52. Gibori G, Khan I, Warshaw ML, McLean MP, Puryear TK, Nelson S, Durkee TJ, Azhar S, Steinschneider A, Rao MC 1988 Placental-derived regulators and the complex control of luteal cell function. Recent Prog Horm Res 44:377–429



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. P. Sablin, A. Woods, I. N. Krylova, P. Hwang, H. A. Ingraham, and R. J. Fletterick
The structure of corepressor Dax-1 bound to its target nuclear receptor LRH-1
PNAS, November 25, 2008; 105(47): 18390 - 18395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Y. Hui and H. A. LaVoie
GATA4 Reduction Enhances 3',5'-Cyclic Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate-Stimulated Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Messenger Ribonucleic Acid and Progesterone Production in Luteinized Porcine Granulosa Cells
Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5557 - 5567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Gupta, M. Venkatesh, H. Wang, S. Kim, M. Sinz, G. L. Goldberg, K. Whitney, C. Longley, and S. Mani
Expanding the Roles for Pregnane X Receptor in Cancer: Proliferation and Drug Resistance in Ovarian Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 14(17): 5332 - 5340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M.-C. Shih, N.-C. Hsu, C.-C. Huang, T.-S. Wu, P.-Y. Lai, and B.-c. Chung
Mutation of Mouse Cyp11a1 Promoter Caused Tissue-Specific Reduction of Gene Expression and Blunted Stress Response without Affecting Reproduction
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2008; 22(4): 915 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Labelle-Dumais, J.-F. Pare, L. Belanger, R. Farookhi, and D. Dufort
Impaired Progesterone Production in Nr5a2+/ Mice Leads to a Reduction in Female Reproductive Function
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 217 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
V. Drouineaud, P. Sagot, C. Garrido, E. Logette, V. Deckert, P. Gambert, C. Jimenez, B. Staels, L. Lagrost, and D. Masson
Inhibition of progesterone production in human luteinized granulosa cells treated with LXR agonists
Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 13(6): 373 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Guo, S.-X. Tao, M. Chen, Y.-Q. Shi, Z.-Q. Zhang, Y.-C. Li, X.-S. Zhang, Z.-Y. Hu, and Y.-X. Liu
Heat Treatment Induces Liver Receptor Homolog-1 Expression in Monkey and Rat Sertoli Cells
Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 1255 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
D. H. Volle, R. Duggavathi, B. C. Magnier, S. M. Houten, C. L. Cummins, J.-M. A. Lobaccaro, G. Verhoeven, K. Schoonjans, and J. Auwerx
The small heterodimer partner is a gonadal gatekeeper of sexual maturation in male mice
Genes & Dev., February 1, 2007; 21(3): 303 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Saxena, R. Escamilla-Hernandez, L. Little-Ihrig, and A. J. Zeleznik
Liver Receptor Homolog-1 and Steroidogenic Factor-1 Have Similar Actions on Rat Granulosa Cell Steroidogenesis
Endocrinology, February 1, 2007; 148(2): 726 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
G. Benoit, A. Cooney, V. Giguere, H. Ingraham, M. Lazar, G. Muscat, T. Perlmann, J.-P. Renaud, J. Schwabe, F. Sladek, et al.
International Union of Pharmacology. LXVI. Orphan Nuclear Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 58(4): 798 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
M. Mueller, I. Cima, M. Noti, A. Fuhrer, S. Jakob, L. Dubuquoy, K. Schoonjans, and T. Brunner
The nuclear receptor LRH-1 critically regulates extra-adrenal glucocorticoid synthesis in the intestine
J. Exp. Med., September 4, 2006; 203(9): 2057 - 2062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
F.-Q. Yu, C.-S. Han, W. Yang, X. Jin, Z.-Y. Hu, and Y.-X. Liu
Activation of the p38 MAPK pathway by follicle-stimulating hormone regulates steroidogenesis in granulosa cells differentially
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2005; 186(1): 85 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Attia, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Attia, G. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals