This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager patientINFORMation Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dixon, A. F. R. Articles by O’Brien, P. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dixon, A. F. R. Articles by O’Brien, P. E. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Medline Plus Health Information Endoscopy Weight Control Related Collections Obesity

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Induces Prolonged Satiety: A Randomized Blind Crossover Study

The Monash University Centre for Obesity Research and Education (CORE), Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Prahran 3181, Victoria, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: John Dixon, Centre for Obesity Research and Education, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Prahran 3181, VIC, Australia. E-mail: john.dixon{at}med.monash.edu.au.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The sustainability of surgically induced weight loss implies that energy homeostasis is favorably altered. We investigated the hypothesis that laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) induces prolonged satiety and that plasma ghrelin is involved.

Seventeen weight-stable subjects who had achieved LAGB-induced weight loss attended blind crossover breakfast tests, one with optimal band restriction and one with reduced restriction. Standardized meals were consumed (0900 h) after 14-h fasting. Satiety visual analog scales were completed hourly (0700–1100 h) before and after feeding. Blood glucose, plasma insulin, ghrelin, and leptin levels were measured. Seventeen body mass index-matched controls were tested.

Optimal restriction was associated with significantly greater fasting and postprandial satiety levels than reduced restriction (P < 0.01). Glucose, insulin, ghrelin, and leptin levels did not alter between optimal and reduced restriction. LAGB subjects displayed higher ghrelin (+12%, P = 0.13) and lower glucose (–17%, P = 0.018), insulin (–33%, P = 0.016), and leptin (–32%, P = 0.05) 4-h area under the curve levels than controls.

Optimal LAGB restriction increased fasting and postprandial satiety levels. This supports the hypothesis that LAGB provides prolonged satiety, present even during fasting, favorably influencing energy homeostasis. Plasma insulin, leptin, and ghrelin appeared unrelated to the satiety effect and displayed orexigenic compensatory changes. Identifying the mechanisms underlying LAGB-induced satiety may assist the understanding of human energy homeostasis and obesity.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
THE HUMAN BODY vigorously defends against weight change, especially weight loss, through compensatory changes in energy intake and expenditure (1, 2). As a result, dietary and medical methods of weight loss typically deliver poor weight reduction that is difficult to sustain (3, 4). However, surgical procedures including laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and vertical banded gastroplasty have been shown to induce significant and sustained weight reduction (5, 6). The durability of surgical weight loss suggests an underlying ability to alter or override the normal energy homeostatic response of the body.

Several peripheral signals are known to regulate energy homeostasis. Insulin and leptin are hormones that circulate in proportion to fat mass and act within the hypothalamus to reduce appetite (7). When fat mass is reduced during weight loss, insulin and leptin levels decline, strongly stimulating appetite and weight gain. Ghrelin, a hormone produced primarily by the stomach (8), appears to stimulate appetite and feeding (9, 10, 11). Ghrelin levels are inversely related to body weight, with obese people displaying low ghrelin levels (12). Diet-induced weight loss has been shown to increase ghrelin levels (13, 14), implying that ghrelin may play a role in countering such weight loss by increasing appetite and energy intake. It has been proposed that lower ghrelin levels may contribute to the success of some surgical weight loss procedures including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (13, 15) and possibly LAGB (16); however, data have been inconsistent (17, 18, 19, 20).

LAGB surgery involves the laparoscopic placement of an adjustable silicone band around the stomach just below the gastroesophageal junction (Fig. 1A). Tubing connects the inner shell of the band to a sc port where injection of saline allows the band stoma to be adjusted. When placed in a patient, the band initially offers minimal gastric restriction; over time, restriction is altered to achieve desired weight and nutritional outcomes without causing undue obstruction. Follow-up of the first 709 patients treated at this center revealed progressive weight loss over 2 yr and weight stabilization thereafter (21). Excess weight lost was 53% at 2 yr and 57% at 6 yr.

View larger version (67K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1. A, LAGB (Lap-band). B, Examples of optimal and reduced LAGB restriction achieved by the addition or removal of saline via injection into a sc placed port.

In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that LAGB induces a prolonged satiety effect that operates even during fasting and that plasma ghrelin plays a role in this effect. LAGB subjects who had achieved sustained weight loss attended fasted crossover breakfast meals with their band set to optimal restriction or reduced restriction. The band setting for each test was blind to the subject and direct investigator, and each subject was crossed over to allow paired comparison between restriction levels. Feelings of satiety and blood glucose, plasma insulin, ghrelin, and leptin levels were measured throughout testing. Body mass index (BMI)-matched controls were also tested.

	Subjects and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Study subjects

LAGB subjects were recruited as volunteers from the LAGB cohort attending The Centre for Bariatric Surgery. The Lap-Band system (Inamed Health, Santa Barbara, CA) was the LAGB device used. Controls were recruited through The Centre for Bariatric Surgery and Monash University Medical School, Alfred Hospital (Victoria, Australia).

Primary exclusion criteria for LAGB subjects and controls included age less than 18 yr, recent weight change (greater than 5 kg in the preceding 2 months), previous weight loss surgery, type 2 diabetes, thyroid disease, and unwillingness or inability to give informed consent. LAGB subjects were between 18 and 36 months post-LAGB surgery, had lost at least 35% of their excess body weight, had not received any change to their band restriction in the preceding month, and had at least 1.5 ml saline present within their band. This latter criterion ensured that reduced band restriction could be applied. All patients from the LAGB cohort who met the study criteria were approached to participate. The amount of satiety experienced by each patient did not influence selection. The selected subjects represented a slightly more successful weight loss group than our general LAGB cohort because normally 15% of patients fail to achieve 35% of excess weight loss after 18 months.

Secondary exclusion criteria included failure to consume the test meal within 20 min, regurgitation of any part of the test meal, and failure to return for a second breakfast test within 2 wk. This latter criterion was applied to minimize any individual changes in body weight and composition between breakfast tests. Due to the experimental nature of this study, the results of excluded subjects were not analyzed on an intention to treat basis.

Controls were individually matched to LAGB participants based on BMI. All but two of the participants had controls that were also matched for sex. All study procedures were in accordance with the Helsinki convention and approved by a Human Research Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Protocol for breakfast testing

Breakfast test protocol was the same for LAGB subjects and controls. Testing occurred at the Monash University Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital. Participants arrived via sedentary transport at 0630 h having fasted from 1900 h the previous day. An intravenous catheter was inserted for blood sampling. Weight and height were measured using same device and operator. Testing was carried out from 0700–1100 h, whereas participants were sedentary. Participants recorded feelings of satiety hourly and directly after feeding on a 200-mm visual analog scale (29), a standard method for assessing satiety. Levels were measured to the nearest millimeter from the origin (no particular feeling, 0 mm; painfully hungry, –100 mm; full to nausea, 100 mm). Blood samples (2 x 7 ml and 1 x 2 ml EDTA) were taken at 0700, 0900, 1000, and 1100 h. A standardized meal containing 22.5 g of a wheat-based cereal (Sanitarium Weet-bix), 170 ml of low-fat milk (Physical), and 12 g of banana was served at 0900 h. This meal represented a common breakfast eaten by LAGB patients as determined by survey. The meal contained approximately 835 kJ (200 kcal) and was 64% carbohydrate, 20.5% protein, and 13.5% fat.

Protocol for randomized blind crossover testing

Each LAGB participant attended two breakfast tests; one with optimal band restriction and one with reduced restriction. Optimal restriction was defined as the amount of band restriction (saline volume) maintaining current weight. Individual settings varied and were determined by independent physicians monitoring weight progress, dietary intake, and obstructive symptoms over time. Reduced restriction was defined as optimal restriction less 2 ml saline or all saline if 1.5–2 ml was present (Fig. 1B). Band adjustments occurred 2 d before each breakfast test and were blind to the subject and direct investigators. The order of tests was randomly allocated using a computer-generated blocked sequence at the time of first adjustment. Adjusters removed all saline before reinjecting the required amount. Readjustments were made after the conclusion of each test at 1100 h. Participants were asked to guess their band status immediately after adjustment to assess blinding.

Biochemical assays

Blood samples for hormone assays were mixed with a protease inhibitor, aprotinin (Trasylol, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp., West Haven, CT), before being centrifuged at 4 C. Plasma was then stored at –80 C. Blood glucose levels (milligrams per deciliter) were measured by hexokinase spectrophotometric assay (Roche Diagnostics Australia, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) with inter and intraassay coefficients of variation < 2%. To convert blood glucose levels to millimoles per liter, divide by 18. Plasma insulin levels (microinternational units per milliliter) were measured by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (Abbott Diagnostics Division, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia) with inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation < 4%. To convert insulin values to picomoles per liter, multiply by 7.175. Plasma ghrelin levels (picograms per milliliter) were measured by Linco Research Inc. (St. Charles, MO) via RIA for total ghrelin (both octanoylated and des-octanoylated ghrelin) with intraassay coefficient of variation < 10%. Ghrelin values cannot be converted to picomoles per liter because two different molecular weight species were measured. The multiplication factor lies between 0.297 and 0.308. Plasma leptin levels (nanograms per milliliter) were measured in duplicate via commercial RIAs (Linco Research) with inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation < 5%. To convert leptin values to nanomoles per milliliter, multiply by 0.08. All samples from each LAGB subject were run in the same hormone assay with their matched control to reduce error.

Power calculations

Power calculations for this study were based on published ghrelin levels recorded in obese subjects (13). These data indicated that, for a power of 0.8, 16 subjects were required to provide 95% confidence of detecting a one SD difference in plasma ghrelin levels.

Statistical analysis

Percentage of excess weight lost was calculated using ideal weight from the Metropolitan Life Tables (30). The trapezoid rule was used to obtain area under the curve (AUC) levels for 2 h preprandial satiety, 2 h postprandial satiety, 4 h satiety, and 4 h biochemical levels. Demographic, satiety, and biochemical data were displayed as mean and SE. Differences between paired LAGB tests were compared by paired two-tailed Student’s t test. Differences between controls and LAGB subjects were compared by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. The influence of time between tests and time with reduced restriction, and change in satiety was tested using univariant general linear modeling. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows version 10 (31).

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Of 23 LAGB patients who attempted the protocol, 17 completed two breakfast tests. Five patients were excluded for failing to consume the meal adequately; three due to regurgitation of food and two due to delayed consumption. These patients were presumably too restricted by their bands to allow passage of the test meal. One patient was excluded after failing to return for a second test within 2 wk. The excluded patients were not significantly different in age, sex, BMI, and weight loss than the completers and were evenly randomized. There were 17 BMI-matched controls tested. Group and test characteristics are shown in Table 1. Nine of the 17 LAGB participants had reduced restriction for their first test, whereas eight had optimal restriction. Results did not vary significantly with the order of testing (data not shown) and were combined. When asked to guess their band status, 13 participants were undecided (76.5%), three were correct (17.5%), and one was incorrect (6%).

All groups (optimal restriction, reduced restriction, and controls) became increasingly hungry preprandially, experienced maximal satiation immediately after the meal, and experienced decreasing satiety thereafter. Optimal restriction was associated with significantly greater feelings of satiety at all six time points when compared with reduced restriction, both during fasting and postprandially (P < 0.01 for all, Fig. 2). Preprandial 2-h AUC satiety levels were higher in those with optimal restriction compared with reduced restriction levels (–24.2 vs. –63.3, P = 0.002). The BMI-matched controls recorded a trend toward lower preprandial 2-h AUC satiety levels than optimal restriction (–63.1 vs. –24.2, P = 0.069) and recorded levels comparable with the reduced restriction levels (–63.1 vs. –63.3, P = 0.87). Postprandial 2-h AUC satiety levels were higher in those with optimal restriction (46.8) compared with reduced restriction levels (6.2, P = 0.001) and BMI-matched controls (10.6, P = 0.003). There were no significant satiety differences found between reduced restriction and controls at any time point or in AUC analysis. The number of days between paired test meals and the number of hours between band adjustment and test meal were not found to significantly influence change in satiety level (R² = 0.11, P = 0.2 and R² = 0.12, P = 0.17, respectively). When the three subjects who correctly guessed their band status were excluded, optimal restriction remained associated with significantly higher satiety levels than reduced restriction and controls at all time points and in AUC analysis.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2. Satiety visual analog scores (±SE) during breakfast testing. White bars, Optimal restriction; black bars, reduced restriction; striped bars, BMI-matched controls. Optimal LAGB restriction was associated with significantly greater feelings of satiety at all six time points compared with reduced restriction (paired Student’s t test, P < 0.01 for all).

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3. Satiety 4-h AUC levels for each LAGB subject, control, and group mean (±SE). Fourteen of 17 subjects recorded increased satiety during optimal LAGB restriction (solid lines), whereas three subjects recorded decreased satiety (broken lines). The group mean satiety level was significantly increased during optimal LAGB restriction compared with reduced restriction and control levels.

There were no statistically significant differences in blood glucose or plasma insulin levels between optimal restriction and reduced restriction at any time points or in AUC analysis (Fig. 4, A and B). There was, however, a trend toward lower 0900 h (fasting) glucose during reduced restriction (2.52 mg/dl lower, P = 0.07) and a preprandial drop in glucose of 2.70 mg/dl from 0700–0900 h with reduced restriction compared with 0.18 mg/dl with optimal restriction (P = 0.12). LAGB subjects had significantly lower glucose 4-h AUC levels (257.4 vs. 309.6, P = 0.018) and insulin 4-h AUC levels (46.1 vs. 69.0, P = 0.016) than controls.

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4. Glucose, insulin, ghrelin, and leptin levels (±SE) during breakfast testing. White circles, Optimal restriction; black circles, reduced restriction; white squares, BMI-matched controls. There were no statistically significant differences between optimal and reduced LAGB restriction.

There were no significant differences in plasma ghrelin or leptin levels between optimal restriction and reduced restriction at any time points or in AUC analysis (Fig. 4, C and D). LAGB subjects had nonstatistically significant higher ghrelin 4-h AUC levels than controls (2803 vs. 2497, P = 0.13). LAGB subjects had a trend toward lower leptin 4-h AUC levels than controls (56.0 vs. 82.1, P = 0.05).

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
This study demonstrated that both fasting and postprandial feelings of satiety were significantly increased with optimal LAGB restriction compared with 2 d of reduced LAGB restriction. Importantly, these appetite changes were recorded within days in weight-stable individuals who had achieved significant weight loss, were the same weight at both tests, were blind to their band status, and after 14 h of fasting. Optimally restricted LAGB participants were also less hungry than BMI-matched controls. These findings strongly support our hypothesis that LAGB exerts an inhibitory effect on central appetite regulation, operating even during fasting. This novel prolonged satiety effect potentially explains why sustained weight loss is achievable with LAGB because the homeostatic increase in appetite that normally counteracts weight loss is continually overridden.

Levels of satiety recorded by the LAGB subjects during reduced band restriction were found to be equivalent to those recorded by BMI-matched controls, despite the fact that some degree of gastric restriction was still likely to be present. This observation may simply be a product of subjectivity in satiety scoring, but may also represent a homeostatic response where feelings of satiety quickly decrease to normal after only a partial reduction in gastric restriction in an attempt to counteract the significant weight loss that has occurred. It is also possible that gastric restriction becomes negligible after a large reduction in band fluid volume.

We showed no significant changes in pre- or postprandial blood glucose, plasma insulin, plasma ghrelin, or plasma leptin levels between optimal LAGB restriction and reduced restriction, despite significant satiety changes. Circulating levels of these biochemical factors are, therefore, unlikely to be principal mediators of LAGB satiety induction. A statistical trend was observed toward lower fasting glucose and a greater drop in preprandial glucose during reduced LAGB restriction compared with optimal restriction. It is difficult to know whether this trend occurred randomly or whether a larger number of subjects providing higher statistical power would have shown a significant difference. Mayer’s glucostatic hypothesis postulates that small declines in glucose concentrations trigger preprandial hunger and meal initiation (32). Thus, it remains possible that optimally adjusted LAGB may reduce hunger by negating Mayer’s effect.

Plasma ghrelin 4-h AUC levels were found to be 12% higher among LAGB subjects compared with BMI-matched controls; however, with only 17 participants in each group this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.13). Others have previously noted ghrelin levels to be higher among LAGB subjects (19, 20), whereas some have shown lower levels (16). In people who have achieved weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric-bypass, ghrelin levels have varied between studies; some showing decrease (13, 15), others describing increase (17, 18). Our study suggests that ghrelin levels may be slightly higher than would be expected for BMI after LAGB-induced weight loss, a response that should stimulate appetite. If ghrelin levels do rise with LAGB-induced weight loss, it would be important to compare this to the physiological rise seen with diet-induced weight loss.

Glucose, insulin, and leptin 4-h AUC levels were all found to be lower among LAGB subjects after significant weight loss than BMI-matched controls (–17%, P = 0.018; –33%, P = 0.016; –32%, P = 0.05 respectively). We have previously confirmed in a much larger study that LAGB-induced weight loss appears to result in greater improvement in insulin sensitivity than would be expected for BMI change alone (33). The reasons behind this phenomenon remain unclear. This study suggests that leptin levels may similarly reduce more than would be expected for BMI change alone. The combination of low insulin and low leptin levels among LAGB subjects compared with BMI-matched controls represents a response that should normally stimulate appetite and weight gain.

Although more participants and tighter matching of controls for weight, height, sex, and age may have proved more definitive, this study indicates that the prolonged satiety effect induced by LAGB operates in the face of, and despite, increased orexigenic signals from insulin, leptin, and possibly ghrelin. This suggests that the mechanisms that underlie the LAGB satiety effect act powerfully within the energy homeostasis system, such that they are able to allow weight loss and prevent weight regain despite orexigenic compensatory changes.

We hypothesize that the restricted proximal stomach pouch present during optimal LAGB adjustment induces satiety by altering neural and hormonal messages arising from the area. These messages, be they many or few, then act as satiety signals to favorably impact appetite and energy regulation within the central nervous system, allowing weight loss and preventing weight regain. This study clearly demonstrates that LAGB-induced satiety is present even after 14 h of fasting; thus, some of the satiety signals involved would appear to act well after food is clear of the pouch. Furthermore, we have shown that by disrupting the integrity of the restricted pouch, the effect on appetite can be significantly altered within days, implying that some of the satiety signals involved are likely to be relatively short-acting.

Roux-en-Y gastric-bypass and vertical banded gastroplasty are two common surgical procedures that, like LAGB, produce significant and sustained weight loss (21, 34) by reducing energy intake (22, 23, 35, 36, 37). Over the years, both procedures have evolved surgically to include the formation of a small proximal pouch of stomach (Fig. 5), whereas Roux-en-Y gastric bypass also prevents food from entering the remainder of the stomach and the proximal small bowel. Based on our satiety findings in LAGB, we propose that an element in the durable long-term weight loss of each of these surgical procedures may be related to the common nature of the restricted proximal stomach pouch.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 5. The common restricted pouch. LAGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and vertical banded gastroplasty all deliver significant and sustained weight loss, and all involve the formation of a restricted proximal pouch of stomach. We propose that hormonal and neural messages arising from the pouch may contribute to the weight loss sustainability of all three procedures.

	Acknowledgments

 
Ghrelin assays were conducted by Linco Research, Inc. We thank all study participants, the staff at the Centre for Obesity Research and Education and at the Centre for Bariatric Surgery, Cheryl Laurie and Aileen Misajon from the Monash University Department of Surgery, Dr. Ray Spark from the Monash University Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and Belinda Drew for special assistance.

	Footnotes

 
This work was supported by Inamed Health, Inc., the manufacturer of the Lap-band (to The Centre for Obesity Research and Education).

First Published Online December 7, 2004

Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the curve; BMI, body mass index; LAGB, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Received August 3, 2004.

Accepted November 29, 2004.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Leibel RL, Rosenbaum M, Hirsch J 1995 Changes in energy expenditure resulting from altered body weight. N Engl J Med 332:621–628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Schwartz MW, Woods SC, Seeley RJ, Barsh GS, Baskin DG, Leibel RL 2003 Is the energy homeostasis system inherently biased toward weight gain? Diabetes 52:232–238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Bray GA, Tartaglia LA 2000 Medicinal strategies in the treatment of obesity. Nature 404:672–677[Medline]
4. Anderson JW, Konz EC, Frederich RC, Wood CL 2001 Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies. Am J Clin Nutr 74:579–584[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Deitel M, Shikora SA 2002 The development of the surgical treatment of morbid obesity. J Am Coll Nutr 21:365–371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Colquitt J, Clegg A, Sidhu M, Royle P, Surgery for morbid obesity. The Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 2. Art. no. CD003641. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641
7. Schwartz MW, Woods SC, Porte Jr D, Seeley RJ, Baskin DG 2000 Central nervous system control of food intake. Nature 404:661–671[Medline]
8. Tschop M, Smiley DL, Heiman ML 2000 Ghrelin induces adiposity in rodents. Nature 407:908–913[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Kojima M, Hosoda H, Date Y, Nakazato M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K 1999 Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature 402:656–660[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Wren AM, Seal LJ, Cohen MA, Brynes AE, Frost GS, Murphy KG, Dhillo WS, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR 2001 Ghrelin enhances appetite and increases food intake in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Cummings DE, Purnell JQ, Frayo RS, Schmidova K, Wisse BE, Weigle DS 2001 A preprandial rise in plasma ghrelin levels suggests a role in meal initiation in humans. Diabetes 50:1714–1719[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Tschop M, Weyer C, Tataranni PA, Devanarayan V, Ravussin E, Heiman ML 2001 Circulating ghrelin levels are decreased in human obesity. Diabetes 50:707–709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Cummings DE, Weigle DS, Frayo RS, Breen PA, Ma MK, Dellinger EP, Purnell JQ 2002 Plasma ghrelin levels after diet-induced weight loss or gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 346:1623–1630[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Hansen TK, Dall R, Hosoda H, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Christiansen JS, Jorgensen JO 2002 Weight loss increases circulating levels of ghrelin in human obesity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 56:203–206[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Geloneze B, Tambascia MA, Pilla VF, Geloneze SR, Repetto EM, Pareja JC 2003 Ghrelin: a gut-brain hormone: effect of gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 13:17–22[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Leonetti F, Silecchia G, Iacobellis G, Ribaudo MC, Zappaterreno A, Tiberti C, Iannucci CV, Perrotta N, Bacci V, Basso MS, Basso N, Di Mario U 2003 Different plasma ghrelin levels after laparoscopic gastric bypass and adjustable gastric banding in morbid obese subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:4227–4231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Faraj M, Havel PJ, Phelis S, Blank D, Sniderman AD, Cianflone K 2003 Plasma acylation-stimulating protein, adiponectin, leptin, and ghrelin before and after weight loss induced by gastric bypass surgery in morbidly obese subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1594–1602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Holdstock C, Engstrom BE, Ohrvall M, Lind L, Sundbom M, Karlsson FA 2003 Ghrelin and adipose tissue regulatory peptides: effect of gastric bypass surgery in obese humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:3177–3183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Stoeckli R, Chanda R, Langer I, Keller U 2004 Changes of body weight and plasma ghrelin levels after gastric banding and gastric bypass. Obes Res 12:346–350[Medline]
20. Cummings DE, Shannon MH 2003 Roles for ghrelin in the regulation of appetite and body weight. Arch Surg 138:389–396[Free Full Text]
21. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Brown W, Schachter LM, Chapman L, Burn AJ, Dixon ME, Scheinkestel C, Halket C, Sutherland LJ, Korin A, Baquie P 2002 The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (Lap-Band): a prospective study of medium-term effects on weight, health and quality of life. Obes Surg 12:652–660[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Lang T, Hauser R, Buddeberg C, Klaghofer R 2002 Impact of gastric banding on eating behavior and weight. Obes Surg 12:100–107[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Busetto L, Valente P, Pisent C, Segato G, de Marchi F, Favretti F, Lise M, Enzi G 1996 Eating pattern in the first year following adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) for morbid obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 20:539–546[Medline]
24. Pappas TN 1992 Physiological satiety implications of gastrointestinal antiobesity surgery. Am J Clin Nutr 55:571S–572S
25. Horowitz M, Collins PJ, Chatterton BE, Harding PE, Watts JM, Shearman DJ 1984 Gastric emptying after gastroplasty for morbid obesity. Br J Surg 71:435–437[Medline]
26. Arnstein NB, Shapiro B, Ekhauser FE, Dmuchowski CF, Knol JA, Strodel WE, Nakajo M, Swanson DP 1985 Morbid obesity treated by gastroplasty: radionuclide gastric emptying studies. Radiology 156:501–504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Miskowiak J, Andersen B, Munck O 1985 Gastric emptying of liquid before and after gastroplasty for morbid obesity. Scand J Gastroenterol 20:583–588[Medline]
28. Christian PE, Datz FL, Moore JG 1986 Gastric emptying studies in the morbidly obese before and after gastroplasty. J Nucl Med 27:1686–1690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Haber GB, Heaton KW, Murphy D, Burroughs LF 1977 Depletion and disruption of dietary fibre. Effects on satiety, plasma- glucose, and serum-insulin. Lancet 2:679–682[CrossRef][Medline]
30. MLF 1983 Height and weight tables: Metropolitan Life Foundation. New York: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
31. SPSS I 1999 SPSS for Windows, 10.0.5 ed. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
32. Woods SC, Seeley RJ, Porte Jr D, Schwartz MW 1998 Signals that regulate food intake and energy homeostasis. Science 280:1378–1383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Dixon JB, Anderson M, Cameron-Smith D, O’Brien PE2004 Sustained weight loss in obese subjects has benefits that are independent of attained weight. Obes Res 12:1895–1902
34. van de Weijgert EJ, Ruseler CH, Elte JW 1999 Long-term follow-up after gastric surgery for morbid obesity: preoperative weight loss improves the long-term control of morbid obesity after vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg 9:426–432[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Halmi KA, Mason E, Falk JR, Stunkard A 1981 Appetitive behavior after gastric bypass for obesity. Int J Obes 5:457–464[Medline]
36. Kenler HA, Brolin RE, Cody RP 1990 Changes in eating behavior after horizontal gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am J Clin Nutr 52:87–92[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Brolin RL, Robertson LB, Kenler HA, Cody RP 1994 Weight loss and dietary intake after vertical banded gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg 220:782–790[Medline]

Find additional patient-related information at:

Gastric Banding Surgery Makes Patients Feel Full

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Ashrafian, C. W. le Roux, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Cardiovascular Function Circulation, November 11, 2008; 118(20): 2091 - 2102. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M H Bennett, S. Mehta, and M. Rhodes Surgery for morbid obesity Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2007; 83(975): 8 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. E. O'Brien, J. B. Dixon, C. Laurie, S. Skinner, J. Proietto, J. McNeil, B. Strauss, S. Marks, L. Schachter, L. Chapman, et al. Treatment of Mild to Moderate Obesity with Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding or an Intensive Medical Program: A Randomized Trial Ann Intern Med, May 2, 2006; 144(9): 625 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Morinigo, V. Moize, M. Musri, A. M. Lacy, S. Navarro, J. L. Marin, S. Delgado, R. Casamitjana, and J. Vidal Glucagon-Like Peptide-1, Peptide YY, Hunger, and Satiety after Gastric Bypass Surgery in Morbidly Obese Subjects J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2006; 91(5): 1735 - 1740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager patientINFORMation Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dixon, A. F. R. Articles by O’Brien, P. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dixon, A. F. R. Articles by O’Brien, P. E. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Medline Plus Health Information Endoscopy Weight Control Related Collections Obesity