help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2004-1500
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/2/779    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mirallié, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kraeber-Bodéré, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mirallié, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kraeber-Bodéré, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
Right arrow Thyroid
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 2 779-788
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

High Frequency of Bone/Bone Marrow Involvement in Advanced Medullary Thyroid Cancer

E. Mirallié, J. P. Vuillez, S. Bardet, E. Frampas, B. Dupas, L. Ferrer, A. Faivre-Chauvet, A. Murat, B. Charbonnel, J. Barbet, D. M. Goldenberg, J. F. Chatal and F. Kraeber-Bodéré

Oncology Research Department (E.M., A.F.-C., J.B., J.F.C., F.K.-B.), Inserm U601, 44093 Nantes, France; Nuclear Medicine Department (J.P.V.), University Hospital, 38043 Grenoble, France; Nuclear Medicine Department (S.B.), François Baclesse Cancer Center, 14021 Caen, France; Radiology (E.F., B.D.) and Endocrinology (B.C., A.M.) Departments, University Hospital, 44093 Nantes, France; Nuclear Medicine Department (L.F.), René Gauducheau Cancer Center, 44805 Nantes, France; and Garden State Cancer Center (D.M.G.), Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology, Belleville, New Jersey 07109-0023

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré, Oncology Research Department, Inserm U601, Institut de Biologie, 9 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes Cedex 1, France. E-mail: francoise.bodere{at}chu-nantes.fr.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
High hematological toxicity has been observed with anti-carcinoembryonic antigen radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), suggesting metastatic bone involvement (BI). This retrospective study evaluated the rate of BI in MTC patients enrolled in two phase-I/II RIT trials using anti-carcinoembryonic antigen x anti-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid bispecific antibodies and [131I]di-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid hapten. Thirty-five patients underwent bone scintigraphy, bone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and post-RIT immunoscintigraphy (IS). IS performed in MTC patients was compared with IS conducted in 12 metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients. Quantitative analysis of bone uptake was performed in three MTC and three CRC patients. In the MTC group, bone scintigraphy detected BI in 56.6% of patients, MRI in 75.8%, and IS in 88.6%. BI was confirmed by undirected (random) bone marrow biopsy, by bone surgery, or by two positive imaging methods in 74.3% of the patients. Sensitivity per patient of bone scintigraphy, MRI, and IS were 72.7, 100, and 100%, respectively. In contrast, IS visualized BI in only 33.3% of CRC patients; bone uptake was lower in CRC than in MTC patients. Bone MRI combined with post-RIT IS disclosed a much higher BI rate in advanced MTC than previously reported in the literature.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MEDULLARY THYROID CARCINOMA (MTC) represents 5–10% of thyroid cancers (1). The prognosis for this neuroendocrine tumor depends on the age of the patients at presentation, the stage of disease, and the kinetics of progression (2). Surgery can cure patients with a localized tumor. Unfortunately, however, MTC often is diagnosed when it is advanced, resulting in a low cure rate. Indeed, 48–80% of patients are operated on with a stage-III or -IV tumor nodes metastases staging (TNM); i.e. with lymph node involvement or extrathyroidal invasion (3, 4, 5, 6). In the management of this group, some investigators have recommended repeated lymph node dissection in the neck and mediastinum (7, 8). Despite negative examinations, usually including bone scintigraphy, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of chest and abdomen, the rate of postoperative normalization of serum calcitonin (Ct), which is elaborated by MTC cells, is low, ranging from 6–38% (9, 10). Such results illustrate the limited sensitivity of these imaging techniques and/or tumor spread to organs or tissues that are not revealed well by conventional imaging modalities.

MTC cells also express a high density of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and several clinical studies have evaluated radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with radiolabeled anti-CEA monoclonal antibodies in MTC patients (11, 12, 13). The pretargeting technique using anti-CEA x anti-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (anti-DTPA) bispecific antibody (BsMAb) F6 x 734 and bivalent hapten, where the first step involves targeting with the BsMAb followed by giving the radiolabeled peptide to the arm that the BsMAb binds, showed an 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity in MTC patients with confirmed tumors (14). In a phase I/II trial assessing F6 x 734 BsMAb and [131I]di-DTPA bivalent hapten for the therapy of patients with advanced MTC, pain relief was observed in four and responses in nine of the 19 assessable patients. These responses corresponded to tumor stabilization in four patients and a reduction in tumor biomarkers and/or in the sum of the products of the longest perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions of at least 25% in five patients. Five patients had a morphological tumor response. The duration of response ranged from 3 to more than 18 months. Surprisingly, however, the hematological toxicity was higher and the maximal tolerated dose lower than in patients with other CEA-expressing tumors [e.g. colorectal carcinomas (CRC)], despite more frequent previous chemotherapy and external radiotherapy being administered to the non-MTC patients (15). In a dose-optimization study evaluating the toxicity of chimeric hMN-14 x m734 BsMAb and [131I]di-DTPA in patients with CEA-positive tumors, grade III/IV leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia was observed in six of nine MTC patients injected with 2.4–3.1 GBq of 131I, but only in two of 12 non-MTC patients injected with 2.2–5.5 GBq (15). Bone involvement (BI) is known to increase the hematological toxicity of internal radiotherapy (16) and could thus explain the toxicity observed with moderate radiation doses administered by RIT. Previous reports showed that MRI is useful in the detection of BI in solid tumors, with a sensitivity of 80–90% and a specificity of 90–100% (17, 18). MRI can identify bone metastases at an earlier stage of growth, before reactivity of the osteoclasts occurs, because this high-resolution technique allows visualization of the bone marrow directly, which represents the initial site of neoplastic infiltration (19, 20, 21).

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, retrospectively, the prevalence of BI using MRI and post-RIT immunoscintigraphy (IS) in 35 MTC patients enrolled in two phase-I/II clinical pretargeted RIT trials using anti-CEA x anti-DTPA BsMAbs and [131I]di-DTPA bivalent hapten. Post-RIT IS conducted in the MTC patients was compared with IS performed in 12 CRC patients, as a control group, because of the low frequency of bone metastases in patients with this cancer type (22).


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient population

Patients more than 18 yr of age, with histologically proven MTC (group I) or CRC (group II) recurrences documented by a rise in serum Ct or CEA concentration and by conventional imaging or IS, were evaluated. All subjects had a Karnofsky performance status of at least 70% and a minimum life expectancy of more than 9 wk. The patients were at least 4 wk beyond any major surgery, external radiotherapy, or chemotherapy and at least 3 months after internal radiotherapy with [131I]metaiodobenzyl guanidine for the MTC group. They had normal hepatic (bilirubin ≥ 2 mg/dl), renal (creatinine ≥ 135 µmol/liter), and hematological (leukocytes ≥ 4000/mm3; platelets ≥ 100,000/mm3) functions. The baseline level for blood human antimouse antibody was less than or equal to 2 µg/ml, as reported previously (13, 15). The protocols were approved by the local ethics committees, and all patients gave their signed informed consent.

Conventional staging

Conventional staging of MTC patients included clinical examination, CT of neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and ultrasound of neck and liver. A bone scintigraphy was recorded 2–4 h after iv injection of 500–700 MBq of 99mTc-diphosphonate, using a large field-of-view {gamma}-camera together with a low-energy, high-resolution, collimator (DHD Sophy Camera, Sopha Medical, Buc, France). Random, undirected bone marrow biopsies were performed in three MTC patients and bone surgery in two patients. Conventional staging of CRC patients included clinical examination, bone scintigraphy, and CT scans of neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis.

Bone MRI

MRI was performed using a 1.5-T system (Magnetom Vision, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The patients were supine, and images of the spine were acquired with a body coil for sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo sequence (TR/TE, 600/12 ms; flip angle, 130°; matrix, 356 x 512 pixels; field of view, 500 x 500; four acquisitions; slice thickness, 5 mm) to study the sternum as well as a spine coil for Flash Gradient Echo T2-weighted sequence (TR/TE, 273/18 ms; flip angle, 30°; matrix, 192 x 256; field of view, 500; two acquisitions; slice thickness, 6 mm), sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo, and gadolinium contrast enhanced with fat saturation (TR/TE, 615/12 ms; flip angle, 150°; matrix, 356 x 512; field of view, 500; four acquisitions; slice thickness, 6 mm). The pelvic girdle was investigated with axial and coronal Flash-Gradient echo T2-weighted images (TR/TE, 250/18 ms; flip angle, 30°; matrix, 192 x 256; field of view, 500; two acquisitions; slice thickness, 6 mm).

Antibody and hapten preparation, testing, and radiolabeling

Anti-CEA x anti-DTPA BsMAbs, mF6 x m734, and hMN-14 x m734 were provided by Immunotech (Marseille, France) and IBC Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Morris Plains, NJ), respectively. These BsMAbs were made by coupling an equimolar amount of the Fab' fragment of anti-CEA monoclonal antibody (murine F6 or humanized hMN-14) to the Fab' fragment of the murine anti-DTPA-indium monoclonal antibody (m734) activated by o-phenylene-bismaleimide. The bivalent hapten used was N-{alpha}-(diethylenetriamine-N,N,N',N''-tetraacetic acid-N''-acetyl)-tyrosyl-N-{epsilon}-(diethylenetriamine-N,N,N',N''-tetraacetic acid-N''-acetyl) lysine (di-DTPA-TL) obtained by reaction of the dianhydride of DTPA with tyrosyl-lysine diacetate. Radiolabeling of the hapten with 131I was performed under contract with CIS Bio International (Schering AG, Saclay, France), using the iodogen method. The specific activity was 38–62 MBq/nmol. The radiochemical purity was greater than 95%, and the immunoreactivity of the preparations was above 90%.

IS

The patients were infused with 12–75 mg/m2 of BsMAb mF6 x m734 or hMN-14 x m734 and then 0.87–3.3 GBq/m2 of [131I]di-DTPA was injected. BsMAb and radiolabeled hapten were administered by a slow infusion (30–60 min) at a 4- to 5-d interval. A shielded PerfuCis pump (CIS Bio International) was used for infusion of the radiolabeled hapten. Vital signs were monitored before and for 2 h after infusion. Patients were kept in lead-shielded rooms for 5–10 d.

Whole-body scintigraphy was performed in all patients 5–10 d after infusion of the radiolabeled hapten. Anterior and posterior views were taken with a dual-headed camera (DHD Sophy Camera, Sopha Medica) equipped with a high-energy collimator. Planar images of the thorax, abdomen, or pelvis were obtained for a few patients using the DST camera equipped with a high-energy collimator. Single-photon emission computed tomography of the thorax or abdomen also was performed in some patients to provide higher contrast and better identification of the tumor site(s).

Qualitative bone imaging analysis

Qualitative image evaluation was performed in individual patients. MRI was analyzed by consensus of two radiologists, and bone scintigraphy and post-RIT IS separately by two nuclear medicine physicians. With MRI, a positive metastatic bone lesion was defined as a focal hypointense bone marrow signal relative to adjacent normal bone marrow on T1-weighted spin-echo images, with an increase of signal intensity on the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spin-echo sequences. With bone scintigraphy, a metastatic bone lesion was defined visually as an area of focally increased uptake of radioactivity relative to adjacent or the contralateral bone region, and with IS, a positive image was an area of focally increased uptake of radioactivity relative to the adjacent or contralateral region or a diffusely increased accretion in the spine and pelvis. BI was considered as positive when at least two different imaging methods or at least one imaging method and histopathology were positive. Thus, true-positive (TP) results corresponded to an abnormal bone image on the imaging method of interest, confirmed by histopathology or by another imaging technique (CT, bone scintigraphy, MRI, or IS) performed 30 d before or after the imaging study. True-negative (TN) results constituted a normal bone image confirmed by histopathology and/or another imaging technique. False-negative (FN) was considered a negative finding on the considered imaging method and a positive finding on one imaging method plus histopathology or by two imaging methods. A false-positive (FP) image was a positive finding on the imaging method of concern and negative findings on the other imaging methods and histopathology. For each imaging modality, sensitivity per patient, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) , and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated, respectively, by the following formulas: sensitivity (%) = (TP/TP + FN) x 100; specificity (%) = (TN/TN + FP) x 100; accuracy = (TP + TN/TP + FN + FP + TN) x 100; PPV (%) = (TP/TP + FP) x 100; and NPV (%) = (TN/TN + FN) x 100.

Quantitative IS analysis

For each patient, two rectangular regions of interest (ROI) were drawn on the posterior view. The first ROI was drawn around the lumbar spine, and the second, same-sized ROI was defined on a background region. For each patient’s imaging session, a quantitative index was determined and calculated as the ratio between the detected counts found in the first ROI to that in the second ROI.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient characteristics

Thirty-five patients (21 men and 14 women), 30–71 yr old, with documented recurrences of MTC (group I) were evaluated (Table 1Go). All MTC patients were treated initially by total thyroidectomy and central and laterocervical lymph node dissection. Thirty-two patients had sporadic and three had familial disease (multiple endocrine neoplasia 2a and familial MTC). Serum Ct levels ranged from 173–100,000 pg/ml (normal, <10) and CEA titers from 4–548 ng/ml (normal, <6) at the time of RIT. Twenty-six MTC patients (74.3%) were considered positive for BI by undirected, random bone marrow biopsy, by bone surgery, or by two or three positive imaging methods.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Demographics and results of MTC patients, group I

 
Group II included 12 patients (five men and seven women), 30–71 yr old, with recurrences of CRC (Table 2Go). Their serum CEA titers ranged from 8–460 ng/ml (normal, <6). BI was found in only 2 of the CRC patients (16.7%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Demographics and results of CRC, group II

 
Conventional imaging

In the MTC group (I), bone scintigraphy was performed in 30 patients and revealed BI in 17 (56.6% of patients) (Fig. 1Go). Results of bone scintigraphy are summarized in Tables 1Go and 3Go. Bone scintigraphy was interpreted as positive in 16 patients with BI and in one patient with unconfirmed BI. Conventional bone imaging sensitivity was 72.7%, specificity 87.5%, and accuracy 76.7%. Moreover, CT allowed detection of neck lymph nodes in 23 patients (65.7%), mediastinal lymph nodes in 13 (37.1%), lung metastases in 11 (31.4%), liver metastases in 13 (37.1%), and an adrenal mass in two patients (5.7%).



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Bone scintigraphy (A), spine MRI (B), and post-RIT IS (C) performed in a MTC patient showing bone involvement. Arrows show bone lesions.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Results of imaging methods for evaluation of BI

 
In group II, CRC patients, conventional imaging allowed visualization of mediastinal and/or lung metastases in nine patients (75.0%), liver metastases in seven (58.3%), abdomen lymph nodes or carcinomatosis in three (25.0%), pelvic recurrences in six (50.0%), and BI in only two patients (16.7%) (Table 2Go).

Bone MRI

The results of bone MRI are summarized in Tables 1Go and 3Go. Spine and pelvic MRI was performed in 29 MTC patients and disclosed BI in 22 (75.8% of patients). Bone MRI was interpreted as positive in 21 patients with BI and in one patient with unconfirmed BI. The sensitivity was 100%, specificity 87.5%, and accuracy 96.6%. Figure 1Go shows images performed in an MTC patient, for whom bone scintigraphy and MRI showed BI, and Fig. 2Go depicts images performed in another MTC patient, for whom bone scintigraphy was doubtful, showing spine heterogeneity; the bone lesions were confirmed by MRI. Figure 3Go has images made in yet another MTC patient, showing MRI detection of BI that was missed by bone scintigraphy.



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Bone scintigraphy (A), spine MRI (B), and post-RIT IS (C) performed in a MTC patient. Bone scintigraphy was doubtful, showing spine heterogeneity. MRI and IS confirmed the bone lesions (arrows). Moreover, IS showed neck and mediastinal lymph nodes (arrows).

 


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Bone scintigraphy (A), MRI (B), and post-RIT IS (C) performed in a MTC patient. Bone scintigraphy was considered to be normal. MRI and IS showed spine and pelvic involvement (arrow). Moreover, IS showed neck lymph node (arrows).

 
IS

In group I, IS images showed BI in 31 of 35 MTC patients (88.6%) (Table 1Go). IS was considered to be positive in the 26 patients with BI and in five patients with unconfirmed BI. The sensitivity of post-RIT IS was 100%, specificity 44.4%, and accuracy 85.7% (Table 3Go). Combined bone scintigraphy, MRI, and IS revealed BI (with at least one of the three imaging methods being positive) in 33 patients (94.2%). In patients with both positive MRI and IS, the sites of positivity for tumor were the same.

Figures 1–3GoGoGo provide scans performed in MTC patients, for whom post-RIT IS confirmed BI. Moreover, IS revealed neck foci in 25 patients (71.4%), mediastinal disease in 17 (48.5%), lung involvement in six (17.1%), and liver disease in seven patients (25.7%). Combined conventional imaging and IS detected neck metastases in 26 patients (81.2%), mediastinal metastases in 19 (54.2%), lung metastases in 12 (34.3%), and liver metastases in 15 patients (42.8%).

In the CRC patients (group II), IS visualized mediastinal and/or lung foci in six patients (50.0%), liver foci in two (16.7%), abdominal lesions in three (25.0%), pelvic disease in six (50.0%), and BI in four patients (33.3%) (Table 2Go). Two of these four patients had known bone metastases by conventional staging. Figure 4Go shows the IS recorded in a CRC patient with no BI disclosed by conventional imaging and no increased focal or diffuse uptake of radioactivity in the skeleton by IS. Figure 5Go is an IS of a CRC patient confirming the BI seen by bone scintigraphy.



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Post-RIT IS performed in a colorectal carcinoma patient, with no bone involvement on conventional imaging. No focal or diffuse increased uptake of radioactivity in skeleton on IS was visualized. IS showed targeting of lung and mediastinal metastases. Arrows show the lesions.

 


View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Images recorded in a colorectal carcinoma patient. Bone scintigraphy (A) showed bone metastases confirmed by post-RIT IS (B). Arrows indicate bone lesions.

 
Quantitative IS analysis

Quantitative scintigraphy analysis was performed in three MTC and in three CRC patients, and the results are summarized in Fig. 6Go. Quantitative analysis confirmed visual IS analysis, showing higher lumbar-to-background ratios in MTC than in CRC patients at 3–10 d after injection of the radiolabeled hapten. For group I MTC patients, the spine-to-background ratios ranged from 1.93–2.02 on d 3, 1.82–2.24 on d 6, 1.97–2.41 on d 8, and 1.79–1.83 on d 10. For group II CRC patients, the ratios were lower, ranging from 1.36–1.48 on d 3, 1.25–1.53 on d 6, 1.07–1.52 on d 8, and 1.07–1.50 on d 10.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Quantitative immunoscintigraphy analysis performed in three MTC patients (solid lines) and three CRC patients (dashed lines). Quantitative analysis confirmed visual IS analysis, showing higher lumbar-to- background ratios 3–10 d after radiolabeled hapten injection in MTC patients than in CRC patients.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the first pretargeted RIT phase I/II study of MTC patients (13), a surprisingly high hematological toxicity was observed when relatively low doses of radioactivity were injected (3 GBq). Such toxicity is expected when administering much higher amounts of radioactivity. Because the pretargeting technique shows a significant reduction of radioactivity in normal tissues as compared with one-step targeting using directly labeled monoclonal antibodies (13, 15), such toxicity was unexpected. In fact, this hematological toxicity in MTC patients was higher than that observed in patients with other CEA-expressing tumors and was related to high bone marrow uptake on post-RIT IS, suggesting involvement of the bone marrow with tumor. Hence, when RIT is planned in advanced MTC patients, BI should be carefully considered because of risks of acute aplasia 4–6 wk after injection of radioactivity and of long-term myelodysplasia. Such risks are all the more important when, as in MTC, life expectancy can be relatively long without any treatment. In this situation, a high bone marrow uptake suggests that a moderate dose be given so as to prevent hematological toxicity but, at the same time, permit isolated or clustered neoplastic cells distributed in the bone marrow to be very efficiently targeted and RIT to possibly control tumor progression. In the phase I/II evaluating anti-CEA x anti-DTPA bispecific antibody F6 x 734 and [131I]di-DTPA bivalent hapten, the maximal tolerated activity was determined in advanced MTC patients with BI at 1.8 GBq/m2 (13). This activity appeared to be enough to produce beneficial therapeutic effects on tumor, with dosimetric results suggesting that small lesions received doses reaching 4970 cGy/GBq (13). However, BI may also limit the therapeutic doses tolerated with potent ß-emitters, such as 131I. In this regard, use of therapeutic radionuclides with shorter path lengths, such as {alpha}- and Auger-emitters, may be more favorable choices for patients with cancer dissemination to their bone marrow.

To confirm the suspicion of BI, bone marrow biopsy is the gold standard, but it is invasive and therefore not readily accepted by patients. Moreover, a limited sample, obtained with an undirected or random biopsy, can be falsely negative. For example, metastatic BI is found in approximately 50% of small-cell lung cancer patients and in up to 85% of breast carcinoma patients at autopsy, but staging procedures detected malignant bone marrow lesions in only 2–30% of patients with these tumors (23). BI was documented histologically in three cases in the present study. To confirm the BI suggested by post-RIT IS, a spine and pelvic MRI was added to the workup before enrollment of the patients. Previous reports suggested that low-intensity lesions on T1-weighted images and high-intensity or iso-intensity lesions on T2-weighted images in the bone marrow indicate infiltration with cancer and showed that MRI is suitable to detect BI of solid tumors, particularly small-cell lung cancer and breast carcinoma, with a sensitivity between 80 and 90% (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26). In one study comparing bone marrow MRI and (undirected) bone marrow biopsy, the detection rate of bone marrow disease was 46% with MRI and 14% with biopsy (23). In the 36 patients in whom MRI was positive, biopsy was negative in 25 cases (23).

In the present investigation, BI was suspected by bone scintigraphy, MRI, or IS in 94.2% of MTC patients and confirmed in 74.3%. In the literature, the rate of BI in advanced MTC has been reported to be 30.3% (98 of 324) in a meta-analysis of 324 cases in 14 clinical studies (3, 12, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38). This detection rate is markedly lower than that found in our study, but imaging techniques in the preious studies included only bone scintigraphy and CT. In this report, as is known for other neuroendocrine tumors (39, 40), MRI appeared to be a sensitive imaging technique for detecting the spread of MTC. It had a higher sensitivity for BI than bone scintigraphy, which detects BI at a relatively advanced stage of tumor infiltration, when an osteoblastic reaction has occurred. These results suggested that MRI should be performed routinely in MTC patients with elevated serum CT level even when bone scintigraphy is normal and even in patients with relatively low CT levels. The advantage of bone scintigraphy is the evaluation of the whole skeleton, and in this study, bone scintigraphy detected bone metastases in 57% of MTC patients. The specificity and accuracy of bone scintigraphy appeared to be relatively good (87.5 and 76.7%, respectively), which is likely because of the evaluated population having a high prevalence of bone metastases and minimal bone infection or rheumatoid arthritis, which could also result in positive bone scans. Previous studies have shown that bone marrow scintigraphy using radiolabeled colloids or radiolabeled antigranulocyte antibodies had a high sensitivity for the detection of BI (41, 42). [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET), in which sensitivity depends on the histological type and metabolism of the tumor, also appears of interest for the detection of BI and provides, like IS, an evaluation of disease throughout the body (18). [18F]Dihydroxyphenylalanine PET is another functional imaging procedure that seems to provide encouraging results in neuroendocrine tumors (43). Indeed, neuroendocrine tumors are capable of taking up amino acids, converting them by means of decarboxylation to biogenic amines, and then storing them in vesicles.

In the current investigation, the sensitivity of IS for BI in MTC patients was high. The two-step pretargeting technique improved the tumor-to-nontumor contrast compared with the conventional one-step (directly labeled antibody) method (14, 44). In the detection of metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma, the sensitivity of 131I scintigraphy was significantly higher with therapeutic activities (3.7 GBq) than with diagnostic doses (370 MBq) (45). Similarly, the high therapeutic doses of radioactivity used in our study could explain the high incidence of BI suspected on post-RIT IS.

The relatively low specificity of IS deserves further consideration. It is related to five patients who had a diffuse bone marrow uptake with consequent hematological toxicity after RIT. All of these patients had no bone biopsy and showed negative bone scintigraphy and MRI, warranting FP findings for IS. However, it cannot be excluded that such positive IS results could be related to a diffuse BI not confirmed by other imaging methods. This situation can be compared with that of differentiated thyroid carcinoma, where lung micrometastases are detected only after 131I therapy and not on low-dose diagnostic scans (45). However, the high bone marrow uptake in MTC patients could have been nonspecific, related to the method and not the tumor type.

To consider this possibility, the study included 12 patients with CRC, which is characterized by a low frequency of bone metastases (8% in patients with isolated liver metastases) (22). In this group, injected with the same amount of bispecific antibody and the same activity of [131I]hapten as in the MTC group, hematological toxicity was observed only with higher injected radioactivity, and quantitative analysis of IS showed a lower bone marrow uptake (15). In another RIT study evaluating high doses of [131I]MN-14 anti-CEA antibody in advanced MTC, the authors reported the detection of 97% of known or suspected disease sites, with excellent targeting of bone and bone marrow, often better than that seen by CT or bone scan, and confirmed by MRI or bone marrow biopsy (12).

Several investigations have evaluated the early dissemination of MTC by RT-PCR (46, 47). Weber et al. (46) evaluated two RT-PCR-based assays for the detection of disseminated tumor cells in blood, bone marrow, and lymph node samples, using frozen tissue and blood samples in 19 patients with MTC. Disseminated tumor cells were detected with cytokeratin-20- and preprogastrin-releasing peptide-PCR in 28% of preoperative blood samples for each. MTC cells were found in three of eight bone marrow samples with cytokeratin-20, and disseminated MTC cells were detected in 26% of histologically tumor-free cervical lymph nodes. These results might therefore explain the low biochemical cure rates reported in the literature and demonstrate an early hematogenous dissemination and bone marrow involvement of MTC, supporting our imaging data.

In this study, the accuracy of imaging methods for revealing spread to soft tissues was not determined in MTC patients, because only CT and IS were performed without confirmation by a third imaging method, like MRI, or by histopathology. However, combined CT and IS seemed to be more revealing than either modality alone, increasing the detection rate of metastases in the neck, mediastinum, lung, and liver. Liver metastases were detected in 42.8% of advanced MTC patients. However, physiological liver uptake of the radiolabeled hapten made visualization of small lesions difficult (14). Moreover, conventional imaging, including CT and ultrasound, is not very sensitive for the detection of liver metastases. Esik et al. (27) reported results of angiography in 36 patients with MTC and a high Ct serum level after total thyroidectomy. Liver metastases were visualized in 89% of patients vs. only 14% with conventional imaging, but the CT technique was not optimal and probably did not use a multiphase protocol. Moreover, these metastases were most often small (2–35 mm) and multiple (5–169 per patient). Furthermore, the rate of cervical lymph node metastases was 81.2% in our study, confirming the 71–80% rates published previously (48). The frequency of this involvement depends upon the type of surgery and the imaging technique (27). For example, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET appears to be more sensitive than conventional imaging modalities for localizing lymph node metastases in MTC (48).

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a much higher rate of BI in MTC than hitherto reported, because of the high sensitivity of MRI and post-RIT IS. Bone MRI is thus recommended in the postsurgical workup of such patients to choose the best therapeutic intervention. Such results suggest the need for systemic therapies, like RIT, to complement surgery in the management of MTC, to control the very frequent bone marrow dissemination of this tumor, mainly in the situation of progressive (clinically and biologically) disease. However, moderate doses of radioactivity may be injected, as in this study, to better treat BI, yet prevent severe hematological toxicity.


    Footnotes
 
First Published Online November 30, 2004

Abbreviations: BI, Bone involvement; BsMAb, bispecific antibody; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CRC, colorectal carcinoma; Ct, calcitonin; CT, computed tomography; DTPA, diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid; FN, false-negative; FP, false-positive; IS, immunoscintigraphy; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; NPV, negative predictive value; PET, positron emission tomography; PPV, positive predictive value; RIT, radioimmunotherapy; ROI, region of interest; TN, true-negative; TP, true-positive.

Received July 29, 2004.

Accepted November 17, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cohen R, Campos JM, Salaün C, Heshmati HM, Kraimps JL, Proye C, Sarfati E, Henry JF, Niccoli-Sire P, Modigliani E 2000 Preoperative calcitonin levels are predictive of tumor size and postoperative normalization in medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:919–922[Abstract]
  2. Kebebew E, Ituarte P, Siperstein A, Duh QY, Clark O 2000 Medullary thyroid carcinoma: clinical characteristics, treatment, prognostic factors, and a comparison of staging systems. Cancer 88:1139–1148[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Machens A, Gimm O, Ukkat J, Hinze R, Schneyer U, Dralle H 2000 Improved prediction of calcitonin normalization in medullary thyroid carcinoma patients by quantitative lymph node analysis. Cancer 88:1909–1915[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Fleming J, Lee J, Bouvet M, Schultz P, Sherman S, Sellin R, Friend K, Burgess A, Cote G, Gagel R, Evans D 1999 Surgical strategy for the treatment of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg 230:697–707[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Raffaitin P, Hamy A, Mirallie E, Meurette G, Duplessis R, Lemeunier P, Murat A, Le Bodic M, Le Neel JC, Paineau J, Visset J 1999 Facteurs pronostiques de survie sans récidive clinique dans les cancers médullaires du corps thyroïde: à propos de 52 cas opérés. Ann Endocrinol 60:435–442[Medline]
  6. Weber T, Schilling T, Franck-Raue K, Colombo-Benkmann M, Hinz U, Ziegler R, Klar E 2001 Impact of modified radical neck dissection on biochemical cure in medullary thyroid carcinomas. Surgery 130:1044–1049[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Dralle H, Damm I, Scheumann GF, Kotzerke J, Kupsch E 1992 Frequency and significance of cervicomediastinal lymph node metastases in medullary thyroid carcinoma : results of a compartment-oriented microdissection method. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 40:264–267[Medline]
  8. Machens A, Gimm O, Ukkat J, Dralle H 1999 Repeat mediastinal lymph node dissection for palliation in advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 384:271–276[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Vitale G, Caraglia M, Ciccarelli A, Lupoli G, Abbruzzese A, Tagliaferri P, Lupoli G 2001 Current approaches and perspectives in the therapy of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 91:1798–1808
  10. Moley JF, Dilley W, DeBenedetti M 1997 Improved results of cervical re-operation for medullary thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg 225:734–743[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Ishikawa N, Hamada S 1976 Association of medullary carcinoma of the thyroid with carcinoembryonic antigen. Br J Cancer 34:111–115[Medline]
  12. Juweid ME, Hajjar G, Stein R, Sharkey RM, Herskovic T, Swayne LC, Suleiman S, Pereira M, Rubin AD, Goldenberg DM 2000 Initial experience with high-dose radioimmunotherapy of metastatic medullary thyroid cancer using 131I-MN-14 F(ab)2 anti-carcinoembryonic antigen MAb and AHSCR. J Nucl Med 41:93–103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kraeber-Bodere F, Bardet S, Hoefnagel CA, Vieira MR, Vuillez JP, Murat A, Ferreira TC, Bardies M, Ferrer L, Resche I, Gautherot E, Rouvier E, Barbet J, Chatal JF 1999 Radioimmunotherapy in medullary thyroid cancer using bispecific antibody and iodine-131-labeled bivalent hapten: Preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res 5:3190s–3198s
  14. Barbet J, Peltier P, Bardet S, Vuillez JP, Bachelot I, Denet S, Olivier P, Leccia F, Corcuff B, Huglo D, Proye C, Rouvier E, Meyer P, Chatal JF 1998 Radioimmunodetection of medullary thyroid carcinoma using indium-111 bivalent hapten and anti-CEA x anti-DTPA-indium bispecific antibody. J Nucl Med 39:1172–1178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kraeber-Bodere F, Faivre-Chauvet A, Ferrer L, Vuillez JP, Brard PY, Rousseau C, Resche I, Devillers A, Laffont S, Bardies M, Chang K, Sharkey RM, Goldenberg DM, Chatal JF, Barbet J 2003 Pharmacokinetics and dosimetry studies for optimization of anti-carcinoembryonic antigen x anti-hapten bispecific antibody-mediated pretargeting of iodine-131-labeled hapten in a phase I radioimmunotherapy trial. Clin Cancer Res 9:3973s–3981s
  16. Behr TM, Sharkey RM, Juweid ME, Dunn RM, Vagg RC, Ying Z, Zhang CH, Swayne LC, Vardi Y, Siegel JA, Goldenberg DM 1997 Phase I/II clinical radioimmunotherapy with an iodine-131-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen murine monoclonal antibody IgG. J Nucl Med 38:858–870[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP, Wohlfart K, von Imhoff E, Fellner FA 2004 Comparison of whole-body MRI with automatic moving table technique and bone scintigraphy for screening for bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14:99–105[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Daldrup-Link HE, Franzius C, Link TM, Laukamp D, Sciuk J, Jurgens H, Schober O, Rummeny EJ 2001 Whole-body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:229–236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Frank JA, Ling A, Patronas NJ, Carrasquillo JA, Horvath K, Hickey AM, Dwyer AJ 1990 Detection of malignant bone tumors: MR imaging vs. scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155:1043–1048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Eustace S, Tello R, DeCarvalho V, Carey J, Wroblicka JT, Melhem ER, Yucel EK 1997 A comparison of whole-body turboSTIR MR imaging and planar 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1655–1661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Jones KM, Unger EC, Granstrom P, Seeger JF, Carmody RF, Yoshino M 1992 Bone marrow imaging using STIR at 0.5 and 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging 10:169–176[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Bjornland K, Flatmark K, Mala T, Mathisen O, Bakka A, Aasen AO, Bergan A, Soreide O, Fodstad O 2003 Detection of disseminated tumour cells in bone marrow of patients with isolated liver metastases from colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 82:224–227[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Seto T, Imamura F, Kuriyama K, Funakoshi T, Gotoh H, Nakayama T, Nakamura S, Horai T 1997 Effect on prognosis of bone marrow infiltration detected by magnetic resonance imaging in small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 33:2333–2337
  24. Algra PR, Bloem JL, Tissing H, Falke TH, Arndt JW, Verboom LJ 1991 Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy. Radiographics 11:219–232[Abstract]
  25. Vogler 3rd JB, Murphy WA 1988 Bone marrow imaging. Radiology 168:679–693[Free Full Text]
  26. Layer G, Steudel A, Schuller H, van Kaick G, Grunwald F, Reiser M, Schild HH 1999 Magnetic resonance imaging to detect bone marrow metastases in the initial staging of small cell lung carcinoma and breast carcinoma. Cancer 85:1004–1009[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Esik O, Szavcsur P, Szakall Jr S, Bajzik G, Repa I, Dabasi G, Fuzy M, Szentirmay Z, Perner F, Kasler M, Lengyel Z, Tron L 2001 Angiography effectively supports diagnosis of hepatic metastases in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 91:2084–2095[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Johnson DG, Coleman RE, McCook TA, Dale JK, Wells SA 1984 Bone and liver images in medullary carcinoma of the thyroid gland: concise communication. J Nucl Med 25:419–422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Ugur O, Kostakglu L, Guler N, Caner B, Uysal U, Elahi N, Haliloglu M, Yuksel D, Aras T, Bayhan H, Bekdik C 1996 Comparison of 99mTc(V)-DMSA, 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI imaging in the follow-up of patients with medullary carcinoma of the thyroid. Eur J Nucl Med 23:1367–1371[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Pellegriti G, Leboulleux S, Baudin E, Bellon N, Scollo C, Travagli JP, Schlumberger M 2003 Long-term outcome of medullary thyroid carcinoma in patients with normal postoperative medical imaging. Br J Cancer 88:1537–1542[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Busnardo B, Girelli ME, Simioni N, Nacamulli D, Busetto E 1984 Nonparallel patterns of calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in the follow-up of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 53:278–285[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Rougier Ph, Calmettes C, Laplanche A, Travagli JP, Lefevre M, Parmentier C, Milhaud G, Tubiana M 1983 The value of calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen in the treatment and management of nonfamilial medullary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 51:855–862[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Schlumberger M, Abdelmoumene N, Delisle MJ, Couette JE 1995 Treatment of advanced medullary thyroid cancer with an alternating combination of 5 FU-streptozocin and 5 FU-dacarbazine. The Groupe d’Etude des Tumeurs à Calcitonine (GETC). Br J Cancer 71:363–365[Medline]
  34. Bergholm U, Bergstrom R, Ekbom A 1997 Long-term follow-up of patients with medullary carcinoma of the thyroid. Cancer 79:132–138[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Chong GC, Beahrs OH, Sizemore GW, Woolner LH 1975 Medullary carcinoma of the thyroid gland. Cancer 35:695–704[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Saad MF, Ordonez NG, Rashid RK, Guido JJ, Hill Jr CS, Hickey RC, Samaan NA 1984 Medullary carcinoma of the thyroid: a study of the clinical features and prognostic factors in 161 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 63:319–342[Medline]
  37. Lupoli G, Cascone E, Arlotta F, Vitale G, Celentano L, Salvatore M, Lombardi G 1996 Treatment of advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma with a combination of recombinant interferon {alpha}-2b and octreotide. Cancer 78:1114–1118[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Wu LT, Averbuch SD, Ball DW, de Bustros A, Baylin SB, McGuire 3rd WP 1994 Treatment of advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma with a combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dacarbazine. Cancer 73:432–436[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Meijer WG, van der Veer E, Jager PL, van der Jagt EJ, Piers BA, Kema IP, de Vries EG, Willemse PH 2003 Bone metastases in carcinoid tumors: clinical features, imaging characteristics, and markers of bone metabolism. J Nucl Med 44:184–191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Gibril F, Doppman JL, Reynolds JC, Chen CC, Sutliff VE, Yu F, Serrano J, Venzon DJ, Jensen RT 1998 Bone metastases in patients with gastrinomas: a prospective study of bone scanning, somatostatin receptor scanning, and magnetic resonance image in their detection, frequency, location, and effect of their detection on management. J Clin Oncol 16:1040–1053[Abstract]
  41. Haubold-Reuter BG, Duewell S, Schilcher BR, Marincek B, von Schulthess GK 1993 The value of bone scintigraphy, bone marrow scintigraphy and fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging in staging of patients with malignant solid tumours: a prospective study. Eur J Nucl Med 20:1063–1069[Medline]
  42. Munz DL, Sandrock D, Rilinger N 1990 Comparison of immunoscintigraphy and colloid scintigraphy of bone marrow. Lancet 1990 336:258–259
  43. Hoegerle S, Altehoefer C, Ghanem N, Brink I, Moser E, Nitzsche E 2001 18F-DOPA positron emission tomography for tumour detection in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma and elevated calcitonin levels. Eur J Nucl Med 1:64–71
  44. Barbet J, Kraeber-Bodere F, Vuillez JP, Gautherot E, Rouvier E, Chatal JF 1999 Pretargeting with the affinity enhancement system for radioimmunotherapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 14:153–166[Medline]
  45. Schlumberger M, Arcangioli O, Piekarski JD, Tubiana M, Parmentier C 1988 Detection and treatment of lung metastases of differentiated thyroid carcinoma in patients with normal chest x-rays. J Nucl Med 29:1790–1794[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Weber T, Lacroix J, Worner S, Weckauf H, Winkler S, Hinz U, Schilling T, Frank-Raue K, Klar E, Knebel Doeberitz Mv M 2003 Detection of hematogenic and lymphogenic tumor cell dissemination in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma by cytokeratin 20 and preprogastrin-releasing peptide RT-PCR. Int J Cancer 103:126–131[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Saller B, Feldmann G, Haupt K, Broecker M, Janssen O, Roggendorf M, Mann K, Lu M 2002 RT-PCR-based detection of circulating calcitonin-producing cells in patients with advanced medullary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:292–296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Szakall Jr S, Esik O, Bajzik G, Repa I, Dabasi G, Sinkovics I, Agoston P, Tron L 2002 18F-FDG PET detection of lymph node metastases in medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med 43:166–171



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
D. M. Goldenberg, E. A. Rossi, R. M. Sharkey, W. J. McBride, and C.-H. Chang
Multifunctional Antibodies by the Dock-and-Lock Method for Improved Cancer Imaging and Therapy by Pretargeting
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 158 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Oudoux, P.-Y. Salaun, C. Bournaud, L. Campion, C. Ansquer, C. Rousseau, S. Bardet, F. Borson-Chazot, J.-P. Vuillez, A. Murat, et al.
Sensitivity and Prognostic Value of Positron Emission Tomography with F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose and Sensitivity of Immunoscintigraphy in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Treated with Anticarcinoembryonic Antigen-Targeted Radioimmunotherapy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2007; 92(12): 4590 - 4597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. L. Giraudet, D. Vanel, S. Leboulleux, A. Auperin, C. Dromain, L. Chami, N. Ny Tovo, J. Lumbroso, N. Lassau, G. Bonniaud, et al.
Imaging Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma with Persistent Elevated Calcitonin Levels
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4185 - 4190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J.-F. Chatal, L. Campion, F. Kraeber-Bodere, S. Bardet, J.-P. Vuillez, B. Charbonnel, V. Rohmer, C.-H. Chang, R. M. Sharkey, D. M. Goldenberg, et al.
Survival Improvement in Patients With Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Who Undergo Pretargeted Anti-Carcinoembryonic-Antigen Radioimmunotherapy: A Collaborative Study With the French Endocrine Tumor Group
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2006; 24(11): 1705 - 1711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. M. Goldenberg, R. M. Sharkey, G. Paganelli, J. Barbet, and J.-F. Chatal
Antibody Pretargeting Advances Cancer Radioimmunodetection and Radioimmunotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2006; 24(5): 823 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
R. M. Reilly
Radioimmunotherapy of Solid Tumors: The Promise of Pretargeting Strategies Using Bispecific Antibodies and Radiolabeled Haptens
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 196 - 199.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
F. Kraeber-Bodere, C. Rousseau, C. Bodet-Milin, L. Ferrer, A. Faivre-Chauvet, L. Campion, J.-P. Vuillez, A. Devillers, C.-H. Chang, D. M. Goldenberg, et al.
Targeting, Toxicity, and Efficacy of 2-Step, Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy Using a Chimeric Bispecific Antibody and 131I-Labeled Bivalent Hapten in a Phase I Optimization Clinical Trial
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 247 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. G. E. H. Lam, C. J. M. Lips, P. L. Jager, R. P. F. Dullaart, E. G. W. M. Lentjes, P. P. van Rijk, and J. M. H. de Klerk
Repeated [131I]Metaiodobenzylguanidine Therapy in Two Patients with Malignant Pheochromocytoma
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5888 - 5895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. M. Sharkey, H. Karacay, T. M. Cardillo, C.-H. Chang, W. J. McBride, E. A. Rossi, I. D. Horak, and D. M. Goldenberg
Improving the Delivery of Radionuclides for Imaging and Therapy of Cancer Using Pretargeting Methods
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 7109s - 7121s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
R. M. Sharkey, G. Hajjar, D. Yeldell, A. Brenner, J. Burton, A. Rubin, and D. M. Goldenberg
A Phase I Trial Combining High-Dose 90Y-Labeled Humanized Anti-CEA Monoclonal Antibody with Doxorubicin and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Rescue in Advanced Medullary Thyroid Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 620 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Machens, U. Schneyer, H.-J. Holzhausen, and H. Dralle
Prospects of Remission in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma According to Basal Calcitonin Level
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2029 - 2034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/2/779    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles