help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0998
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/11/6290    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhayana, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ezzat, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhayana, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ezzat, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 11 6290-6295
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

The Implication of Somatotroph Adenoma Phenotype to Somatostatin Analog Responsiveness in Acromegaly

Shelly Bhayana, Gillian L. Booth, Sylvia L. Asa, Kalman Kovacs and Shereen Ezzat

Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital (S.B., S.E.) and St. Michael’s Hospital (G.L.B.); Department of Pathology, University Health Network (S.L.A.) and St. Michael’s Hospital (K.K.); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology (S.L.A., K.K.) and Department of Medicine, Ontario Cancer Institute and the Freeman Centre for Endocrine Oncology (S.B., S.L.A., S.E.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G-1X5

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Shereen Ezzat, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Room 437, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5. E-mail: sezzat{at}mtsinai.on.ca.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Persistently elevated GH and IGF-I levels are associated with increased mortality. Their response to somatostatin analogs (SSA) is variable.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the significance of somatotroph adenoma type on response to SSA.

Design: This study was a retrospective examination of postoperatively treated acromegalic patients with the SSA octreotide.

Setting: The study was performed at a university-affiliated tertiary care center.

Patients: Forty patients with acromegaly were studied.

Main Outcome Measures: Normalization of IGF-I levels and GH responses were the main outcome measures.

Results: Univariate analysis revealed that responders were more likely to have densely granulated somatotroph adenomas (80% vs. 43.8%; P = 0.024), to be older (51.3 vs. 38.2 yr; P < 0.003), to have smaller tumors (stage ≤3; 78.6% vs. 35.7%; P = 0.022), to have lower baseline IGF-I (453 vs. 716 µg/liter; P < 0.001) and GH levels (2.7 vs. 7.8 µg/liter; P < 0.05), and to require a lower maximum dose of SSA (24 vs. 31 mg every 4 wk; P = 0.013). Multivariate analysis confirmed that a densely granulated adenoma was the strongest predictor of complete response [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 58.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24–1000.00; P = 0.04] compared with other covariates, including older age at time of diagnosis (OR, 1.15/yr; 95% CI, 1.01–1.31; P = 0.03), and tumor stage of 3 or less (OR, 29.77; 95% CI, 1.01–885.45; P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Somatotroph tumor type represents a strong clinical predictor of response to SSA treatment and will help to identify patients who warrant more vigilant management of their disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ACROMEGALY IS A disorder characterized by increased circulating GH and IGF-I levels that is associated with significant morbidity and excess mortality (1). Patients with persistently elevated GH and IGF-I levels have an increased risk of multiple comorbidities, including left ventricular dysfunction (2), obstructive sleep apnea (3), arthritis, impaired glucose tolerance, and colonic polyps (4). However, mortality is also increased in those patients with persistently active disease, with a 3.5-fold increased mortality risk in this group compared with that in patients in remission (5).

Recent studies have convincingly demonstrated that normalization of GH or IGF-I concentrations results in both a significant improvement in comorbidities (6, 7, 8) and a reduction in mortality to that of the general population (9, 10, 11). The development of selective pharmacological agents over the last decade and of somatostatin analogs (SSA) in particular has greatly advanced the treatment of acromegaly. Given the availability of these agents and the benefits of treatment, an aggressive therapeutic approach is necessary and warranted in these patients.

Therapeutic options for patients with acromegaly include surgical resection, primary or adjunctive medical therapy, and radiation therapy. Surgical treatment alone has been found to be curative in less than 60% of patients (5, 12). Similarly, primary therapy with octreotide has been shown to normalize IGF-I in a similar proportion and renders GH levels below 2.5 µg/liter in approximately 80% of patients. However, pituitary tumor size reduction with SSA is limited to a smaller subset of about only 40% of subjects (13, 14). A recent review of SSA treatment in acromegaly suggests that the effect appears to be related to the subject’s prior treatment, with approximately 57% and 28% of patients demonstrating tumor size shrinkage when this medical treatment was administered as primary and adjunctive therapies, respectively (15). Furthermore, when it does occur, tumor size reduction is usually of a modest degree. Therefore, most patients require surgical resection of their pituitary tumor, followed by adjunctive medical therapy with SSA for optimal biochemical control.

Despite aggressive therapy, however, response rates to SSA postoperatively are variable and are thought to depend mainly on somatostatin receptor subtype expression by the adenoma (16). Other possible predictive factors of responsiveness to SSA have been examined, including patient age, tumor size, and baseline IGF-I or GH levels (17). However, the various pituitary pathologies underlying acromegaly have not been extensively examined for their impact on SSA responsiveness (18). One previous study demonstrated that the GH inhibitory preoperative effects of octreotide were significantly greater in patients harboring densely granulated somatotroph adenomas than in those harboring sparsely granulated adenomas (19). We examined the significance of the various clinical predictive factors in the context of pathological classification of the somatotroph adenoma type and compared it with other putative predictors of response to octreotide treatment in acromegalic patients who have undergone previous transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient population

We conducted a 10-yr retrospective analysis of patients with acromegaly at a single center (University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada) between February 1994 and September 2004. Patients treated with transsphenoidal pituitary surgery and adjunctively with the SSA octreotide for a minimum of 4 months were included in our analysis. Among 67 consecutive patients with acromegaly who were seen at our center during the study period, 40 were eligible for inclusion in our cohort. Patients not requiring SSA after surgery (n = 12), those treated with SSA alone (n = 6), or those requiring the addition of a dopamine agonist to SSA (n = 9) were not included in this study. All included patients were treated postoperatively with octreotide (Sandostatin-LAR, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Montreal, Canada; doses ranging from 20 mg, im, every 6 wk to 30 mg, im, every 4 wk). Adjustments to the treatment dose were based on the aim of targeting age-adjusted normal IGF-I and GH levels as described below. Among those included in the analysis, nine patients had received radiation therapy (ranging from 6 months to 12 yr after surgery) before study inclusion.

During follow-up visits, patients were assessed clinically every 4 months and had serum fasting GH (Quest Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA) and IGF-I (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc., Webster, TX) levels evaluated at each visit. Patients with persistently elevated GH (>1.0 µg/liter) and/or age-adjusted IGF-I levels also underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

Response assignment

Patients in our cohort (n = 40) were followed for a mean of 28 months (range, 4–96 months). No patients were lost to follow-up or died during the observation period.

Patients achieving normalization of age-adjusted IGF-I levels after treatment with SSA were classified as responders; nonresponders maintained levels above this range for up to 7 yr. Nonresponders were additionally categorized into those who reached an IGF-I level within 25% of the upper limits of their normal values (partial responders); those who had an IGF-I level exceeding this range were defined as resistant. All patients who had a discrepancy between GH and IGF-I (normal IGF-I with a random GH >1.0 µg/liter) underwent a 75-g OGTT and were only classified as responders if the GH suppressed to below 1.0 µg/liter.

Patient variables

Tumor pathology served as our primary variable of interest. The pathology of the pituitary adenomas resected was examined using immunohistochemistry for GH and keratin for all cases, and tumors were classified according to the accepted Armed Forces Institute of Pathology and World Health Organization criteria (18, 20). This classification was also corroborated by electron microscopy. All patients were classified as having either a sparsely or a densely granulated somatotroph adenoma, and one patient with an acidophil stem cell adenoma on pathology was classified as "other" (see Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Clinical features of patients according to SSA treatment outcome

 
Other baseline variables, recorded at the start of treatment with SSA included gender; age at time of diagnosis; presence of comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); pituitary tumor stage of 3 or less (according to Hardy’s classification) (21); pre-SSA IGF-I and GH levels; and maximum dose of SSA received. Those with a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level below 5.7 mmol/liter were classified as normoglycemic, and those with a FPG between 5.7 and 6.9 mmol/liter were classified as having impaired fasting glucose. Impaired glucose tolerance was defined in those with an FPG less than 7.0 mmol/liter and a 2 h post-75-g OGTT plasma glucose level between 7.8 and 11.0 mmol/liter. DM was diagnosed in those with an FPG of 7.0 mmol/liter or higher or a 2 h plasma glucose level of 11.1 mmol/liter or more after an OGTT on two consecutive measurements, a previous diagnosis of diabetes, or current use of glucose-lowering medications. Hypertension was defined as those with a blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg or higher on two separate visits. Patients were classified as having OSA if the diagnosis was confirmed during a formal sleep study. In addition, achievement of a 40% reduction of IGF-I or GH at 6 months of treatment or an absolute IGF-I less than 400 µg/liter at 6 months, which was previously shown to predict the response to SSA (17), was documented.

Statistical analyses

The statistical program SPSS (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used. Continuous baseline data are presented as the mean ± SD, and binomial variables are presented as the absolute number and percent prevalence in the population. Results were analyzed for statistically significant differences using an independent t test or {chi}2 test where appropriate. In addition, ANOVA was conducted to compare baseline characteristics across the following three groups: responders, partial responders, and resistant cases. Logistic regression was used to examine the effect of pituitary pathology (densely vs. sparsely granulated/other) on the likelihood of achieving a complete response, after adjusting for potential confounders. The dependent binomial variable was defined as response or no response in terms of IGF-I normalization. Independent variables used in the multivariate analysis included all baseline variables (as indicated above) that were related to IGF-I normalization on univariate analysis with a P < 0.1 For logistic regression, no data were missing for all included patients (n = 40) for age at diagnosis, maximum dose, and baseline IGF-I. Pituitary pathology assignment was not possible for technical reasons in four cases (three in the nonresponder group and one in the responder group). We assigned those four cases to the densely granulated group to avoid skewing the data in favor of our hypothesis that densely granulated pathology predicts response to SSA, given that most of the missing data were in the nonresponder group. The likelihood of complete response associated with each covariant was expressed as an adjusted odds ratio (OR) ± 95% confidence interval (CI).

Finally, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to reflect the time to a complete response between patients with densely vs. sparsely granulated pituitary lesions. Time was recorded as months in the study on SSA treatment. Patients were censored if they achieved an IGF-I level normal for age and gender or if the patient’s IGF-I level did not normalize, but they required other adjunctive treatment (repeat pituitary surgery, radiation therapy, addition of dopamine agonist, or addition of GH receptor antagonist) subsequent to treatment with SSA. No patient died or was lost to follow-up during the study time. A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered significant.

The study protocol was approved by the research ethics board at Mount Sinai and St. Michael’s Hospitals, University of Toronto.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient profiles

The baseline characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1Go. Among the 40 patients, there was a relatively equal distribution of males and females (45% vs. 55%). The mean age of the cohort at the time of the study was 53.1 yr (range, 19–76), an average of 8 yr from the time of diagnosis. A comparison of potential confounders influencing the response to SSA treatment in the two study groups (responders and nonresponders) is summarized in Table 2Go. Twenty-one (53%) were classified as complete responders, and 19 (48%) as nonresponders. Among the nonresponders, six of 19 (31.6%) were classified as partial responders, and 13 of 19 (68.4%) were classified as resistant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Characteristics of study population

 
Univariate analyses

In comparing the two groups of responders vs. nonresponders, responders were older at the time of diagnosis (51.3 vs. 38.2 yr; P < 0.003), were significantly more likely to have a densely granulated somatotroph adenoma (80% vs. 43.8%; P = 0.024), or tumor stage of 3 or lower (78.6% vs. 35.7%; P = 0.022), had lower IGF-I levels (453 vs. 716 µg/liter; P < 0.001) and lower GH levels (2.7 vs. 7.8 µg/liter; P < 0.05), and required a lower maximum dose of SSA (24 vs. 31 mg every 4 wk; P = 0.013; Table 2Go). When comparing across all three groups, (responder, partial responder, and resistant), there was a significant difference in mean age (P < 0.001), the proportion with a tumor stage 3 or lower (P < 0.01), mean pretreatment IGF-I levels (P < 0.001), and the maximum dose of SSA required (P = 0.008).

In general, patients who responded to SSA demonstrated an improvement in glycemic status. For instance, 20% (one of five) of responders with baseline DM achieved normalization of fasting blood sugars, and 50% (one of two) of partial responders with DM at baseline converted from diabetes back to impaired fasting glucose. In contrast, none of the patients resistant to treatment with SSA demonstrated improvement in their diabetic status (Fig. 1Go). None of the patients in the responder or partial responder groups had progression of diabetic status, whereas two patients in the resistant group did: one progressed from impaired glucose tolerance to DM, and another converted from normoglycemia to impaired glucose tolerance during follow-up. There was no clinically identifiable change in HTN or OSA status in any of the groups (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Patient characteristics based on response to SSA treatment. DG, Densely granulated pituitary adenoma; SG, sparsely granulated pituitary adenoma.

 
As a secondary outcome, responders were also more likely to achieve a 40% reduction in IGF-I levels at 6 months (47.6% vs. 10.5%; P < 0.01) or achieve an absolute IGF-I level below 400 µg/liter at 6 months (71.4% vs. 10.5%; P < 0.001). No significant difference was present between partial and resistant patients for these two parameters.

Multivariate analyses

On multivariate analysis, the presence of a densely granulated lesion was the strongest predictor of a complete response (adjusted OR, 58.4; 95% CI, 1.24–1000.00; P = 0.04) after adjusting for other significant baseline predictors (Table 3Go). Other significant covariates included a higher age at the time of diagnosis (OR, 1.15/yr of age; 95% CI, 1.01–1.31; P = 0.03), tumor stage of 3 or lower (OR, 29.8; 95% CI, 1.001–885.4; P < 0.05), and lower pretreatment IGF-I levels (OR, 0.93/10 µg/liter rise in IGF-I; 95% CI, 0.87–0.99; P = 0.04). Although higher baseline GH levels were associated with a lower odds of responding to SSA on univariate analysis (OR, 0.75/10 µg/liter; 95% CI, 0.58–0.98; P = 0.04), it was no longer a statistically significant predictor of response once tumor pathology, stage, pretreatment IGF-I levels, and age at diagnosis were included in the model. In addition, treatment dose was no longer significantly related to treatment response when other variables were included in the model (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.62–1.10; for the 20- vs. 30-mg dose SSA).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Logistic regression analysis of variables predicting responsiveness to SSA treatment in acromegaly

 
The Kaplan-Meier survival function based on response to SSA treatment in patients with densely granulated vs. sparsely granulated tumor types is shown in Fig. 2Go. No overall difference in the two groups was noted using the log-rank statistic (P = 0.460). However, at 48 months there was a trend toward a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.06), suggesting an increased success of SSA treatment in those patients with densely granulated adenomas compared with that in patients with sparsely granulated adenomas.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Kaplan-Meier survival function of SSA treatment of patients with acromegaly according to somatotroph adenoma tumor type.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We report here the results of clinical, biochemical, and pathological predictors of response to adjunctive therapy with the SSA octreotide after transsphenoidal surgery in a series of 40 patients with acromegaly followed for up to 8 yr. In this cohort of patients, the presence of a densely granulated somatotroph adenoma was the strongest predictor of cure (OR, 58.4), followed by tumor stage less than 3 (OR, 29.8) and older age at diagnosis (OR, 1.15). The use of SSAs, primarily in the form of long-acting octreotide (octreotide-LAR), is currently the most common form of adjunctive medical treatment for persistent or uncontrolled disease, as seen in our study population, after transsphenoidal surgery. Given that most patients with acromegaly will undergo surgical resection of the adenoma, we would argue that careful examination of the pathology can help predict future responsiveness to SSAs or the need for other modalities of treatment, including GH receptor antagonists.

Over the years, the definition of a biochemical cure of acromegaly has continued to change due to the availability of improved GH and IGF-I serum assays and additional evidence of increased survival in patients with normalization of these values (10). Before 1980, a posttreatment GH level below 5 µg/liter was believed to represent disease cure (9); by 1990, this was lowered to less than 2.5 µg/liter. A recent study, however, demonstrates that normalization of GH to below 2.0 µg/liter is not sufficient, and that reduction of mortality rates to that of the general population is achieved by normalization of GH to less than 1.0 µg/liter and reduction of IGF-I to the normal range (10). Current guidelines and those used to describe cure in this study define biochemical cure as a suppressible GH of less than 1 µg/liter after an OGTT and normalization of IGF-I (1). As a result of the more stringent criteria for cure, increasing numbers of patients are requiring adjunctive therapy after surgical resection, including treatments with SSAs, dopamine agonists, and/or radiation.

Because SSAs are the primary form of adjunctive treatment for persistent disease in acromegaly, it is crucial to examine predictors of response to this therapy among patients with acromegaly using current definitions of cure as outlined above. In this series, pathological classification of the adenoma as a densely granulated somatotroph variant was determined to be the strongest predictor of disease control in patients requiring adjunctive treatment with a SSA after surgery. This finding is consistent with the results of a previous study demonstrating that densely granulated somatotroph adenomas have increased preoperative responsiveness to octreotide compared with sparsely granulated adenomas (19). It is also consistent with the identified pathophysiology of densely granulated adenomas that are known to harbor activating mutations of the Gs{alpha} protein resulting in constitutive activation of adenylate cyclase (22, 23, 24). This pathway is amenable to suppression through somatostatin receptor activation. In contrast, the pathogenesis of sparsely granulated somatotroph adenomas is not known (25). Moreover, the relationship between the sparsely granulated adenoma phenotype and somatostatin receptor subtype expression remains to be determined and should be the subject of future investigation. In a recent retrospective study of 57 patients with acromegaly treated primarily with transsphenoidal surgery, similar rates of remission, using modern remission criteria, as outlined above, were noted in those with densely or sparsely granulated adenomas on pathology (26). In that study, however, there was a high rate of remission postoperatively, with only nine patients requiring adjunctive medical therapy with SSA. Thus, our population probably represents a cohort with more advanced disease, because only those requiring adjunctive medical therapy were enrolled. Interestingly, in that same series, sparsely granulated lesions had a higher rate of dural invasion (~50%) and a lower preoperative GH level (26).

After tumor pathology, a preoperative tumor stage below 3 was determined to be the next strongest predictor of response to treatment with SSA after transsphenoidal surgery. This observation is in keeping with a previous study of a series of patients with acromegaly in whom higher tumor stage, tumor grade, and preoperative GH levels were all predictive of disease persistence in patients with acromegaly after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (9). In that study, however, a GH level less than 5 µg/liter was used to define cure, and only 12% of patients received adjunctive postoperative therapy with SSAs for persistent disease. Thus, our series provides additional information about the importance of tumor stage in acromegaly, because it predicts not only the response to initial transsphenoidal pituitary surgery but also that to adjunctive treatment with SSAs using the current definition of disease control.

In our analysis, tumor pathology was the strongest predictor of IGF-I normalization in patients with acromegaly receiving postoperative SSA therapy. Because of the wide CIs associated with our estimates, the relative importance of tumor pathology vs. tumor stage is uncertain; however, we can confidently conclude that both are significantly related to the subsequent response to treatment.

Finally, older age at the time of diagnosis was determined to be a predictor of complete response to treatment with SSA after transsphenoidal surgery. Our data demonstrated a significant difference of 13 yr in the mean age of responders compared with nonresponders. Previous studies have also shown a correlation between younger age and higher preoperative GH levels with disease persistence after surgery (27). However, in a recent series examining predictors of mortality in a cohort of 208 acromegalic patients, older age at the time of diagnosis was determined to be a significant predictor of mortality (10). This study, however, predated the use of routine SSAs in New Zealand, and therefore, subjects in this analysis did not receive this adjunctive therapy.

It should be noted that although 23% of the subjects (n = 9) had received previous pituitary radiation, twice as many patients in the nonresponder group (31.6%) underwent radiation therapy compared with the responder group (14.3%). Because previous radiation therapy would increase the likelihood of achieving normalization of IGF-I and GH levels, this would not have affected the response rate seen in the two groups, because fewer responders received radiation therapy.

To date, this is the first systematic analysis of predictors of responsiveness to adjunctive postoperative SSA therapy using the updated guidelines (GH <1.0 µg/liter and normalization of IGF-I) to define biochemical cure with respect to the pathological features of the pituitary adenoma type. The significance of tumor classification as a clinical predictor of response to pharmacotherapy with SSAs emphasizes the importance of accurate morphologic classification using immunohistochemistry and/or electron microscopy.


    Footnotes
 
First Published Online August 23, 2005

Abbreviations: CI, Confidence interval; DM, diabetes mellitus; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HTN, hypertension; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; OR, odds ratio; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; SSA, somatostatin analog.

Received May 5, 2005.

Accepted August 15, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Acromegaly Guidelines Task Force 2004 American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly. Endocr Pract 10:213–225[Medline]
  2. Fazio S, Cittadini A, Merola CB, Sabatini D, Colao A, Biondi B, Lombardi G, Sacca L 1994 Impaired cardiac performance is a distinct feature of uncomplicated acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:441–446[Abstract]
  3. Fatti LM, Scacchi M, Pincelli AI, Lavezzi E, Cavagnini F 2001 Prevalence and pathogenesis of sleep apnea and lung disease in acromegaly. Pituitary 4:259–262[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Baris D, Gridley G, Ron E, Weiderpass E, Mellemkjaer L, Ekbom A, Olsen JH, Baron JA, Fraumeni Jr JF 2002 Acromegaly and cancer risk: a cohort study in Sweden and Denmark. Cancer Causes Control 13:395–400[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Swearingen B, Barker FG, Katznelson L, Biller BM, Grinspoon S, Klibanski A, Moayeri N, Black PM, Zervas NT 1998 Long-term mortality after transsphenoidal surgery and adjunctive therapy for acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3419–3426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Colao A, Marzullo P, Ferone D, Spinelli L, Cuocolo A, Bonaduce D, Salvatore M, Boerlin V, Lancranjan I, Lombardi G 2000 Cardiovascular effects of depot long-acting somatostatin analog Sandostatin LAR in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:3132–3140[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Colao A, Marzullo P, Vallone G, Giaccio A, Ferone D, Rossi E, Scarpa R, Smaltino F, Lombardi G 1999 Ultrasonographic evidence of joint thickening reversibility in acromegalic patients treated with lanreotide for 12 months. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 51:611–618[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Grunstein RR, Ho KK, Sullivan CE 1994 Effect of octreotide, a somatostatin analog, on sleep apnea in patients with acromegaly. Ann Intern Med 121:478–483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Abosch A, Tyrrell JB, Lamborn KR, Hannegan LT, Applebury CB, Wilson CB 1998 Transsphenoidal microsurgery for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas: initial outcome and long-term results. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3411–3418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Holdaway IM, Rajasoorya RC, Gamble GD 2004 Factors influencing mortality in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:667–674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Melmed S 1998 Tight control of growth hormone: an attainable outcome for acromegaly treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3409–3410[Free Full Text]
  12. Sheaves R, Jenkins P, Blackburn P, Huneidi AH, Afshar F, Medbak S, Grossman AB, Besser GM, Wass JA 1996 Outcome of transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly using strict criteria for surgical cure. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 45:407–413[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Lamberts SW, Del Pozo E 1988 Somatostatin analog treatment of acromegaly: new aspects. Horm Res 29:115–117[Medline]
  14. Bevan JS, Atkin SL, Atkinson AB, Bouloux PM, Hanna F, Harris PE, James RA, McConnell M, Roberts GA, Scanlon MF, Stewart PM, Teasdale E, Turner HE, Wass JA, Wardlaw JM 2002 Primary medical therapy for acromegaly: an open, prospective, multicenter study of the effects of subcutaneous and intramuscular slow-release octreotide on growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-I, and tumor size. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4554–4563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Bevan JS 2005 Clinical review: the antitumoral effects of somatostatin analog therapy in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:1856–1863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ezzat S, Horvath E, Harris AG, Kovacs K 1994 Morphological effects of octreotide on growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:113–118[Abstract]
  17. Colao A, Ferone D, Lastoria S, Marzullo P, Cerbone G, Di Samo A, Longobardi S, Merola B, Salvatore M, Lombardi G 1996 Prediction of efficacy of octreotide therapy in patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:2356–2362[Abstract]
  18. Asa SL 1998 Tumors of the pituitary gland. Atlas of tumor pathology, 3rd Series, Fascicle 22. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
  19. Ezzat S, Kontogeorgos G, Redelmeier DA, Horvath E, Harris AG, Kovacs K 1995 In vivo responsiveness of morphological variants of growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas to octreotide. Eur J Endocrinol 133:686–690[Abstract]
  20. DeLellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU, Eng C 2004 Tumours of endocrine organs. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Lyons: IARC
  21. Hardy J 1968 Transphenoidal microsurgery of the normal and pathological pituitary. In: Clinical neurosurgery. Proceedings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 185–217
  22. Vallar L, Spada A, Giannattasio G 1987 Altered Gs and adenylate cyclase activity in human GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Nature 330:566–568[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Landis CA, Masters SB, Spada A, Pace AM, Bourne HR, Vallar L 1989 GTPase inhibiting mutations activate the {alpha}-chain of Gs and stimulate adenylate cyclase in human pituitary tumors. Nature 340:692–696[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Spada A, Arosio M, Bochicchio D, Bazzoni N, Vallar L, Bassetti M, Faglia G 1990 Clinical, biochemical and morphological correlates in patients bearing growth hormone-secreting pituitary tumors with or without constitutively active adenylyl cyclase. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:1421–1426[Abstract]
  25. Asa SL, Ezzat S 2002 The pathogenesis of pituitary tumours. Nat Rev Cancer 2:836–849[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Kreutzer J, Vance ML, Lopes MB, Laws Jr ER 2001 Surgical management of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas: an outcome study using modern remission criteria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:4072–4077[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Ezzat S, Forster MJ, Berchtold P, Redelmeier DA, Boerlin V, Harris AG 1994 Acromegaly. Clinical and biochemical features in 500 patients. Medicine 73:233–240[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. Leontiou, M. Gueorguiev, J. van der Spuy, R. Quinton, F. Lolli, S. Hassan, H. S. Chahal, S. C. Igreja, S. Jordan, J. Rowe, et al.
The Role of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Interacting Protein Gene in Familial and Sporadic Pituitary Adenomas
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2390 - 2401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. L. Asa, R. DiGiovanni, J. Jiang, M. L. Ward, K. Loesch, S. Yamada, T. Sano, K. Yoshimoto, S. J. Frank, and S. Ezzat
A Growth Hormone Receptor Mutation Impairs Growth Hormone Autofeedback Signaling in Pituitary Tumors
Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 67(15): 7505 - 7511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
N Y Y Al-Brahim and S L Asa
My approach to pathology of the pituitary gland
J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2006; 59(12): 1245 - 1253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/11/6290    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhayana, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ezzat, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhayana, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ezzat, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals