help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0935
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hemminki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hemminki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Thyroid
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 10 5747-5753
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

Familial Risks for Nonmedullary Thyroid Cancer

Kari Hemminki, Charis Eng and Bowang Chen

Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology (K.H., B.C.), German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Biosciences at Novum (K.H.), Karolinska Institute, 141 57 Huddinge, Sweden; and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program (C.E.), Human Cancer Genetics Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Kari Hemminki, Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 580, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail: K.Hemminki{at}dkfz.de.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Reliable data on familial risks are important for clinical counseling and cancer genetics.

Objective: We wanted to define familial risks for histopathology-specific nonmedullary thyroid cancers through parental and sibling probands.

Setting: The study examines the nationwide Swedish Family-Cancer Database on 10.5 million individuals, containing families with parents and offspring.

Patients: Cancer data were retrieved from the Swedish Cancer Registry from years 1958 to 2002, including 3292 patients with thyroid adenocarcinoma. The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine histology was available from 1993 onward, with 1449 papillary, 288 follicular, 148 anaplastic, and 68 Hurthle cell tumors.

Main Outcome Measures: Familial risk for offspring was defined through standardized incidence ratio, adjusted for many variables.

Results: The familial risk for papillary carcinoma was 3.21 and 6.24 when a parent and a sibling, respectively, were diagnosed with thyroid cancers. There was an apparent gender preference, particularly among sisters, whose risk was 11.19. The risks were highest for early onset cancers. Thyroid adenocarcinoma was shown to be associated with melanoma and connective tissue tumors, and probably also with neurinomas (schwannomas). Associations found in single comparisons with papillary thyroid cancer and other sites included right-sided colon, breast, ovarian, and kidney cancers. Hurthle cell tumors were associated with Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, but the numbers of cases were small.

Conclusions: The present findings were based on a limited number of cases, but they display a complex and heterogeneous pattern of familial nonmedullary thyroid cancer. The high risk for papillary carcinoma among women requires clinical attention, although the absolute risks for this rare cancer are still low.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
NONMEDULLARY THYROID CANCER (NMTC) accounts for over 95% of all thyroid cancers, and four histological types can be distinguished: papillary (85%), follicular (10%), Hurthle cell, and anaplastic types (1, 2). Overall, the incidence of thyroid cancer is high in the developed countries and in the countries of East Asia (3). In Sweden, the incidence has remained relatively stable over the past decades, but in many European countries and the United States there has been an increase in incidence, particularly of papillary carcinoma (4, 5). The two-times higher rate in women than in men has persisted (4, 6). However, not much is known about the epidemiology of the rare histological types (7). Some established risk factors for thyroid cancer are ionizing radiation, which causes papillary carcinoma, and iodine deficiency or imbalance, which predisposes to the follicular and anaplastic forms (3, 8); goiter also appears to be a risk factor for papillary tumors, particularly in men (9, 10). NMTC of distinct histological types can be a component in some heritable cancer syndromes such as familial adenomatous polyposis, Cowden syndrome, Werner syndrome, and Carney complex, and probably also in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and tuberous sclerosis (11, 12). The gene defects predisposing to these hereditary thyroid cancers are known (12, 13). Many of these syndromes are uncommon and they probably account for a small proportion of familial NMTC, and other susceptibility genes are to be expected (14, 15, 16). Although several studies have described familial NMTC (17, 18, 19), only a few provide data on specific histology (15, 20, 21). Several types of associated tumors have been described in families with hereditary thyroid cancers, but population-based studies on histology-specific NMTCs and associated tumors in families have been limited (1, 15, 21, 22).

In this study, we use the 2004 update of the nationwide Swedish Family-Cancer Database to address the questions about the age and gender effects in histology-specific NMTCs and their association with other familial cancers (23). Medullary thyroid cancer received a specific code in the Swedish Cancer Registry in 1985, which limited our previous study in sample size and follow-up time (22). In the present analysis, we have the possibility of considering both parent-offspring and sibling effects in the offspring population aged up to 70 yr.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Statistics Sweden maintains a "Multigeneration Register" where individuals (called children or offspring in this study) born in Sweden in 1932 and later are registered with their parents (those pleading parenthood at birth) and are organized in families (24). Practically, only the two oldest generations, parents and offspring, contributed cases to family studies. Information on the Database is also available at the Nature Genetics website as supplementary information (25), and the current update (2004) of the Database has recently been described (23). The data on families and cancers have a complete coverage, barring some groups of deceased offspring, which affect those born in the 1930s and who died before 1991. This small group of offspring with missing links to parents has a negligible effect on the estimates of familial risk (26). The Multigeneration Register was linked by the individually unique national registration number to the Cancer Registry from years 1958–2002. Cancer registration is considered to be close to 100% currently (6).

The site of cancer is registered based on a four-digit diagnostic code according to the seventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-7). We have subdivided thyroid cancers according to histological types as coded in the Cancer Registry. Before 1985, thyroid cancers were subdivided into two histopathological categories: adenocarcinoma (code 096), including papillary and follicular thyroid cancer, and undifferentiated cancer, (code 196) which included anaplastic tumors. Most medullary cancers were classified as undifferentiated. A separate code for medullary cancer (186) was introduced in 1985, and thus the present follow-up was started in 1986. The following ICD-7 codes were pooled: "upper aerodigestive tract" cancer codes 161 (larynx) and 140–148 (lip, mouth, pharynx), except for code 142 (salivary glands), and "leukemia" codes 204–207 (leukemias), 208 (polycytemia vera), and 209 (myelofibrosis). Rectal cancer, ICD-7 code 154, was subdivided into anus (squamous cell carcinoma, 154.1) and mucosal rectum (154.0). In some analysis, leukemias were divided into subtypes. Only squamous cell carcinomas of the skin, but not basal cell carcinomas, are registered in the Cancer Registry. From year 1993 onward, ICD-O-2/ICD with histopathological data according to the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED; http://snomed.org) was used; we refer to this classification as "SNOMED". According to this classification, it was possible to distinguish papillary, follicular, anaplastic, and Hurthle histologies.

Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were used to measure thyroid cancer risks for offspring when their parents, siblings, or both were diagnosed with specific cancers (i.e. using parents and siblings as probands). The reference rate was calculated for offspring whose parents/siblings had no specified cancer, as the number of cases divided by person-years at risk. SIR was the ratio of the observed (O) to expected number of cases. The expected numbers were calculated from 5-yr-age-, sex-, period-, area (county)-, socioeconomic status-standardized rates for offspring whose parents were not diagnosed with thyroid cancer. This is an indirect standardization for the listed possible intervening variables. Confidence intervals (95% CI or 99% CI) were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution (27). Follow-up was started for each offspring at birth, immigration, or January 1, 1986, whichever came latest. When the SNOMED histology was used, follow-up was started January 1, 1993. Follow-up was terminated on diagnosis of first cancer, death, emigration, or the closing date of the study, December 31, 2002. Risks for siblings were calculated using the cohort method, considering dependence between the pairs in the assessment of 95% CIs, as described elsewhere (28). Some analyses were carried out in "reverse order", using family members with thyroid cancer as probands and calculating SIRs for any cancer among offspring.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Some relevant numbers from the Database are shown in Table 1Go. The number of parents was 6.59 million and the number of offspring was 6.99 million. Thyroid adenocarcinoma was recorded in 2893 parents and 1863 offspring between 1986–2002. The specific SNOMED histology was available from 1993 onward, resulting in 1592 parental and 1104 offspring tumors. Because the offspring population was younger (0–70 yr) than the parental population (any age), the proportion of relatively early onset papillary tumors was higher among the offspring (83.0%) compared with the parents (72.5%). The opposite was true for anaplastic tumors, which present at a relatively old age. The distribution of follicular and Hurthle cell tumors did not differ much between the two generations. Figure 1Go shows age-incidence relationships for the specific histologies. Papillary cancer showed a large difference for female and male rates; the female rates reached a maximum in the age group of 40–49 yr, preceding the male maximum by a decade. Note that the y-scale is different for papillary and the three other tumor types. Follicular and anaplastic tumors showed prominent old-age components in the 70- to 79-yr age group. For Hurthle cell tumors, the age-incidence curves were relatively flat between ages 40–79 yr.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Numbers of individuals and cancers covered in the analyses

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Age-incidence relationships for histology-specific thyroid cancers in the Family-Cancer Database.

 
Familial risks for thyroid adenocarcinoma in offspring are shown in Table 2Go when parents (without affected siblings) and siblings (without affected parents) were used as probands. Only one family was found with more than two individuals diagnosed with thyroid cancer: the mother was diagnosed with follicular cancer at age 70, the father was diagnosed with an unspecified adenocarcinoma at age 43, and both of their male offspring were diagnosed with papillary cancer at ages 45 and 64. The SIR for thyroid adenocarcinoma was 3.83 or 5.15 when parents and siblings, or siblings, respectively, were diagnosed with any thyroid cancer; both of these SIRs were significant even at the 0.01 level, as shown by underling in the tables. The risk was significant (SIR 4.50) when the mother was the proband; however, from an affected mother, the risk was equally high (data not shown) for sons (SIR 4.37, n = 5, 95% CI 1.38–10.28) and for daughters (SIR 4.54, n = 15, 95% CI 2.53–7.51). When either parent was diagnosed with thyroid cancer, the risk for sons was 4.98 (n = 8, 95% CI 2.13–9.86) and for daughters 3.44 (n = 16, 95% CI 1.96–5.60). The SIR for thyroid adenocarcinoma for siblings was 5.15 (Table 2Go), and only women showed an excess risk (6.36). Among the 14 affected sibling pairs, all were women, except for one brother-sister pair. At discordant cancer sites, only maternal breast (1.22) and kidney (1.70) cancers and parental connective tissue tumors (2.18) were associated with an increased risk of thyroid adenocarcinoma. In one family, a father was diagnosed with fibrosarcoma and his two daughters were diagnosed with thyroid adenocarcinoma, of which one was papillary cancer. An association with connective tissue tumors was also noted among siblings (5.50 for men) but they were of diverse histological types. The association with kidney cancer among siblings was of borderline significance (2.32). Right-sided colon cancer (2.92) and ovarian cancer (2.52) were other significant tumors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. SIR for adenocarcinoma of the thyroid gland in offspring by familial cancer

 
We carried out analyses of thyroid adenocarcinoma in reverse order by calculating SIR for any cancer in offspring using parents and siblings diagnosed with thyroid adenocarcinoma as probands, which, for any discordant site, is a completely independent analysis for the parent-offspring comparison. However, because the offspring population has fewer cancers than the parental population, the power was decreased (the total number of offspring-parent pairs diagnosed with any cancer decreased from 623 in Table 2 to 158, data not shown). With the exception of thyroid cancer, none of the significant increases in Table 2Go were found in the reverse analyses. However, the SIR for melanoma was increased from parental (SIR 1.69, n = 19, 95% CI 1.02–2.65) and sibling probands (SIR in brothers 2.55, n = 7, 95% CI 1.01–5.28). The SIR for nervous system tumors was also increased (SIR 1.78, n = 20, 95% CI 1.08–2.75) when parents were diagnosed with thyroid adenocarcinoma. The increase was particularly for neurinoma (synonymous to schwannoma and neurilemoma), the SIR being 4.27 (n = 6, 95% CI 1.54–9.35).

Familial risks were analyzed by the specific SNOMED histology; data for papillary cancer with the largest numbers of cases are shown in Table 3Go. For papillary thyroid cancer, the SIR was 3.21 from parents and 6.24 from siblings diagnosed with any thyroid cancer. The risk in offspring was 3.60 (n = 8, 95% CI 1.54–7.13) when the mother was diagnosed with thyroid cancer, and it was 2.23 (n = 2, 95% CI 0.21–8.20) when the father was affected (data not shown); the mother was a proband only to one son with papillary cancer, giving an SIR of 1.50 (95% CI 0–8.57), and to seven daughters, giving an SIR of 4.21 (95% CI 1.67–8.53). Among siblings, only females were diagnosed with papillary cancer, giving an SIR of 11.19 (n = 8, 95% CI 4.78–22.16) (data not shown). Maternal breast cancer (SIR 1.37) and sibling right-sided colon (SIR 3.70, borderline significance), ovarian (SIR 3.17), and kidney (SIR 3.71) cancers were associated with a risk of papillary tumors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. SIR for familial papillary thyroid in offspring by familial cancer

 
Among the 10 offspring with papillary thyroid cancers (Table 2Go), all but one were diagnosed before age 50 yr. For ages less than 40 yr, the SIR was 4.64 (n = 5, 95% CI 1.46–10.91); for ages 40 to 49 yr, the SIR was 4.43 (n = 4, 95% CI 1.15–11.15). The mean age of onset of papillary cancer was 41.4 yr (median 43 yr). When a parent was diagnosed with thyroid cancer, the mean age for papillary cancer was 39.4 yr (median 41 yr). For sibling pairs (all sisters) the mean was 37.9 yr (median 35 yr). The cumulative risks for papillary thyroid cancers up to age 70 yr were 0.03% for men and 0.09% for women.

No single significant associations were observed for follicular, Hurthle, and anaplastic cancers (data not shown), with some exceptions. The risk for prostate cancer was increased (SIR 4.52, n = 4, 95% CI 1.18–11.70) when a sibling was diagnosed with follicular thyroid cancer. However, three of the prostate cancers came from one family. Another exception was an increase in follicular thyroid cancer to 4.25 when fathers were diagnosed with leukemia (n = 4, 95% CI 1.11–10.99); two of these were acute myeloid leukemia and the others were chronic myeloid leukemia and chronic lymphoid leukemia. No follicular or anaplastic cancers were found in offspring when parents were diagnosed with any thyroid cancer. For the rare Hurthle cell tumors, no familial thyroid cancers were observed; however, associations with parental Hodgkin’s disease (SIR 26.08, n = 2, 95% CI 2.46–95.91) and sibling non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (SIR 15.13, n = 2, 95% CI 1.43–55.63) were significant, although encompassing only two sibling pairs each.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All thyroid cancer diagnoses reported to the Swedish Cancer Registry are histologically verified, and we can assume that the diagnostic accuracy is as good as it can be at a national level (6). The age-incidence curves in Fig. 1Go showed characteristic features for the four histological types implying diagnostic consistency. Papillary thyroid cancer showed a large female excess and an early age of onset, the maximum incidence being 40–49 yr for women and 50–59 yr for men. Follicular thyroid cancer also had a clear female excess but the age of onset peaked at ages 70–79 yr. Anaplastic cancer was largely a disease of old age, whereas Hurthle cell tumors show a broad age-incidence maximum between ages 40–79 yr.

Although the present study was nationwide, the number of cases was small for a rare cancer, such as thyroid cancer. A further limitation was that the specific SNOMED histology was used beginning only in 1993. Thus we are unable to address time trends in the incidence of these histological types. Yet, the overall incidence of thyroid cancer and the female excess have remained stable throughout cancer registration in Sweden (6).

The number of familial cases for follicular, anaplastic, and Hurtle cell cancers was so small that no definite associations could be found. The familial clustering of Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with Hurthle cell cancers may not be a coincidence, because Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma share many etiological features, including familial risks and association with immunosuppression and infections by Epstein-Barr virus and HIV (3, 29, 30, 31). Independent studies are necessary to confirm the association of Hurthle cell tumors with lymphomas. The association of follicular tumors with diverse types of leukemias was probably fortuitous.

Papillary thyroid cancer showed a high familial risk when parents or siblings were diagnosed with thyroid cancer, SIRs being 3.21 and 6.24, respectively. Both of these SIRs were highly significant (<1% level) but they were not significantly different from each other (95% CIs overlapped). The underlying cause may be a medium-penetrant dominant gene or group of genes, and the excess risk in siblings could be a recessive effect. Mothers appeared to transmit the susceptibility more to daughters (SIR 4.32) than to sons (SIR 1.50, but one case only). The excess sibling risk was contributed entirely by females, whose SIR was as high as 11.19. All these SIRs were based on small numbers, implying wide CIs and discouraging strong conclusions. Also it should be pointed out that the absolute risks even for familial cases were low. The female cumulative risk of papillary cancer was 0.09% up to age 70, translating to a cumulative risk of 1% among affected sisters (11-fold risk).

The high female excess incidence in papillary thyroid cancer has been associated with a response to estrogen stimulation or other hormonal factors, which could underlie the risks for sisters (32). However, the small number of male cases warrants caution. A review on families with papillary thyroid carcinoma makes no point about gender effects, as many families have affected individuals of both genders (10). In the collected families, there was an association with papillary cancer and multinodular goiter, and goiter appears to predispose men in particular to papillary thyroid cancer (9). Thus, in Sweden, where goiter has been rare during the past decades, this putative male contribution to papillary thyroid cancer may be small and hence, the female predominance. A female excess in familial cases of NMTC was noted also in a Canadian study (18), but in an Icelandic study, men were at a higher risk (19). In the present study, the mean and median ages of onset were 2 yr lower for papillary cancer in offspring of affected parents and some 5 yr lower for affected sisters, providing further support for a true familial risk.

The associations of thyroid adenocarcinoma with discordant sites could largely be ascribed to papillary thyroid cancers, the most common subtype (cf. Tables 2Go and 3Go). However, these kinds of exploratory analyses are complicated by problems of multiple comparisons. Because much of the existing literature cannot be used as a reference, we have to rely on the internal consistency of the present data. According to the above results, even the "reverse analysis", which is a potential way to confirm associations between discordant sites, was not very helpful because of the reduction in the study population. Yet, the association of ovarian cancer with thyroid adenocarcinoma was found, but because it was among siblings, it was not an independent test. Finding a risk through both parental and sibling probands provides strong evidence for a true familial association. Using that criterion, the associations between thyroid adenocarcinoma and connective tissue tumors and melanoma (reverse analysis) were confirmed. The associations that remained unconfirmed in the present dataset were between papillary thyroid cancers and right-sided colon, breast, and kidney cancers. However, breast cancer was found to be increased in families of NMTC patients in Canada (18). A Utah study found an association between all thyroid tumors and breast, prostate, and soft tissue tumors and leukemia (33). Stoffer et al. (20) reported an association of papillary tumors with colon cancer. In reverse analysis, thyroid adenocarcinoma associated with nervous system cancers, particularly with neurinomas, showing a high SIR of 4.27. Papillary thyroid cancer is an uncommon component of in familial polyposis coli, which is, however, a dominant disease, not preferentially affecting the right side of the colon (12). Because the risks between papillary thyroid cancer and right-sided colon cancer were exclusively between siblings, this syndrome appears less likely. Although breast cancer is a well-documented component of Cowden syndrome (occurring in 28–50% of affected women), where follicular thyroid carcinoma is the main thyroid cancer component tumor (occurring in 10% of affected people in a lifetime), it is unclear whether it could be identified in the present Database because of the relatively small numbers of follicular tumors in the Database, and because of the variable expressivity and pleiotropy of Cowden syndrome (12). Specifically, benign neoplasias of the thyroid and breast are more common than malignant neoplasias of these organs in Cowden syndrome. Because this Database does not store information on nonmalignant disease, it is almost certain that this syndromic association could not be uncovered.

In summary, the present analysis from a national population-based Database showed a high risk of familiality for thyroid papillary carcinoma, with intriguing gender preferences particularly among sisters. Thyroid adenocarcinoma, of which papillary tumors formed the largest subgroup, were found to be associated with melanoma and connective tissue tumors, and probably also with neurinomas. Associations found in single comparisons with papillary thyroid cancer and other sites included right-sided colon, breast, ovarian, and kidney cancers. Hurthle cell tumors associated with Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, but the number of cases was small. The present findings display a complex and heterogeneous pattern of familial NMTC which will be a challenge to molecular dissection of the underlying mechanisms.


    Acknowledgments
 
The Family-Cancer Database was created by linking registers maintained at Statistics Sweden and the Swedish Cancer Registry.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe, the Swedish Cancer Society, and Grant EU LSHC-CT-2004-503465.

First Published Online July 19, 2005

Abbreviations: CI, Confidence interval; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; NMTC, nonmedullary thyroid cancer; O, observed; SIR, standardized incidence ratio; SNOMED, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine.

Received April 28, 2005.

Accepted July 8, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Alsanea O, Clark OH 2001 Familial thyroid cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 13:44–51[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Ruben Harach H 2001 Familial nonmedullary thyroid neoplasia. Endocr Pathol 12:97–112[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Stewart B, Kleihues P 2003 World cancer report. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 1–351
  4. Howe HL, Wingo PA, Thun MJ, Ries LA, Rosenberg HM, Feigal EG, Edwards BK 2001 Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer (1973 through 1998), featuring cancers with recent increasing trends. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:824–842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Reynolds RM, Weir J, Stockton DL, Brewster DH, Sandeep TC, Strachan MW 2005 Changing trends in incidence and mortality of thyroid cancer in Scotland. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf.) 62:156–162
  6. Center for Epidemiology 2004 Cancer incidence in Sweden 2002. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare; 1–204
  7. Pettersson B, Adami H-O, Wilander E, Coleman M 1991 Trends in thyroid cancer incidence in Sweden, 1958–1981, by histopathologic type. Int J Cancer 48:28–33[Medline]
  8. Negri E, Ron E, Franceschi S, Dal Maso L, Mark S, Preston-Martin S, McTirnan A, Kolonel L, Kleinerman R, Land C, Jin F, Wingren G, Galanti MR, Hallquist A, Glattre E, Lund E, Levi F, Linos D, Braga C, La Vecchia C 1999 Pooled analysis of case-control studies of thyroid cancer. Cancer Causes Control 10:131–142[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Franceschi S, Preston-Martin S, Dal Maso L, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Mack WJ, McTiernan A, Kolonel L, Mark SD, Mabuchi K, Jin F, Wingren G, Galanti R, Hallquist A, Glattre E, Lund E, Levi F, Linos D, Ron E 1999 A pooled analysis of case-control studies of thyroid cancer. IV. Benign thyroid diseases. Cancer Causes Control 10:583–595[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Musholt TJ, Musholt PB, Petrich T, Oetting G, Knapp WH, Klempnauer J 2000 Familial papillary thyroid carcinoma: genetics, criteria for diagnosis, clinical features, and surgical treatment. World J Surg 24:1409–1417[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Lindor N, Greene M 1998 Program tMFC. A concise handbook of family cancer syndromes. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1039–1071[Free Full Text]
  12. Nagy R, Sweet K, Eng C 2004 Highly penetrant hereditary cancer syndromes. Oncogene 23:6445–6470[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Eng C 2003 PTEN: one gene, many syndromes. Hum Mutat 22:183–198[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Eng C 2000 Familial papillary thyroid cancer-many syndromes, too many genes. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 85:1755–1757[Free Full Text]
  15. Frich L, Glattre E, Akslen LA 2001 Familial occurrence of nonmedullary thyroid cancer: a population-based study of 5673 first-degree relatives of thyroid cancer patients from Norway. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10:113–117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. McKay JD, Lesueur F, Jonard L, Pastore A, Williamson J, Hoffman L, Burgess J, Duffield A, Papotti M, Stark M, Sobol H, Maes B, Murat A, Kaariainen H, Bertholon-Gregoire M, Zini M, Rossing MA, Toubert ME, Bonichon F, Cavarec M, Bernard AM, Boneu A, Leprat F, Haas O, Lasset C, Schlumberger M, Canzian F, Goldgar DE, Romeo G 2001 Localization of a susceptibility gene for familial nonmedullary thyroid carcinoma to chromosome 2q21. Am J Hum Genet 69:440–446[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Hemminki K, Dong C 2001 Population-based study of familial medullary thyroid cancer. Fam Cancer 1:45–49[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Pal T, Vogl FD, Chappuis PO, Tsang R, Brierley J, Renard H, Sanders K, Kantemiroff T, Bagha S, Goldgar DE, Narod SA, Foulkes WD 2001 Increased risk for nonmedullary thyroid cancer in the first degree relatives of prevalent cases of nonmedullary thyroid cancer: a hospital-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5307–5312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hrafnkelsson J, Tulinius H, Jonasson JG, Sigvaldason H 2001 Familial non-medullary thyroid cancer in Iceland. J Med Genet 38:189–191[Free Full Text]
  20. Stoffer SS, Van Dyke DL, Bach JV, Szpunar W, Weiss L 1986 Familial papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Am J Med Genet 25:775–782[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Galanti M, Ekbom A, Grimelius L, Yuen J 1997 Parental cancer and the risk of papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. Br J Cancer 75:451–456[Medline]
  22. Hemminki K, Dong C 2000 Familial relationships in thyroid cancer by histopathological type. Int J Cancer 85:201–205[Medline]
  23. Hemminki K, Granstrom C, Chen B 2005 The Swedish Family-Cancer: update, application to colorectal cancer and clinical relevance. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 3:7–18
  24. Hemminki K, Li X, Plna K, Granström C, Vaittinen P 2001 The nation-wide Swedish Family-Cancer Database: updated structure and familial rates. Acta Oncol 40:772–777[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Hemminki K, Granström C 2002 Risk for familial breast cancer increases with age. Nat Genet 32:233[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Hemminki K, Li X 2003 Familial risk of cancer by site and histopathology. Int J Cancer 103:105–109[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Esteve J, Benhamou E, Raymond L 1994 Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol 128. Lyon, France: IARC Press
  28. Hemminki K, Vaittinen P, Dong C, Easton D 2001 Sibling risks in cancer: clues to recessive or X-linked genes? Br J Cancer 84:388–391[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Goldin LR, Pfeiffer RM, Gridley G, Gail MH, Li X, Mellemkjaer L, Olsen JH, Hemminki K, Linet MS 2004 Familial aggregation of Hodgkin lymphoma and related tumors. Cancer 100:1902–1908[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Goldin LR, Pfeiffer RM, Li X, Hemminki K 2004 Familial risk of lymphoproliferative tumors in families of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the Swedish Family-Cancer Database. Blood 104:1850–1854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Altieri A, Bermejo JL, Hemminki K 2005 Familial risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other lymphoproliferative malignancies by histopathologic subtype: the Swedish-Family Cancer Database. Blood 106:668–672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kumar V, Cotran R, Robbins S 1997 Basic pathology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders
  33. Goldgar DE, Easton DF, Cannon-Albright LA, Skolnick MH 1994 Systematic population-based assessment of cancer risk in first-degree relatives of cancer probands. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1600–1607[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M Capezzone, S Marchisotta, S Cantara, G Busonero, L Brilli, K Pazaitou-Panayiotou, A F Carli, G Caruso, P Toti, S Capitani, et al.
Familial non-medullary thyroid carcinoma displays the features of clinical anticipation suggestive of a distinct biological entity
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2008; 15(4): 1075 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Capezzone, S. Cantara, S. Marchisotta, S. Filetti, M. M. De Santi, B. Rossi, G. Ronga, C. Durante, and F. Pacini
Short Telomeres, Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Gene Amplification, and Increased Telomerase Activity in the Blood of Familial Papillary Thyroid Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2008; 93(10): 3950 - 3957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
A. B. Schneider, E. Ron, J. Lubin, M. Stovall, E. Shore-Freedman, J. Tolentino, and B. J. Collins
Acoustic neuromas following childhood radiation treatment for benign conditions of the head and neck
Neuro-oncol, February 1, 2008; 10(1): 73 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. D. Burman
Micropapillary Thyroid Cancer: Should We Aspirate All Nodules Regardless of Size?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2043 - 2046.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hemminki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hemminki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Thyroid
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals