| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism (R.G., M.P., M.Bald., A.P., M.Balb., L.B., E.G., E.A.), Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Disciplines (M.Bo, M.V.), Section of Geriatrics, and Department of Public Health and Microbiology (G.M.), University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Emanuela Arvat, M.D., Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Molinette, C.so Dogliotti 14, 10126 Turin, Italy. E-mail: emanuela.arvat{at}unito.it.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: ACTH, cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) secretion were studied in eight healthy elderly (75.1 ± 3.2 yr) and eight young (25.0 ± 4.6 yr) subjects during placebo or canrenoate (CAN) administration (200 mg iv bolus followed by 200 mg infused over 4 h).
Results: During placebo administration, ACTH and cortisol areas under the curve (AUCs) in elderly subjects were higher than in young subjects (P
0.01); conversely, DHEA AUCs in elderly subjects were lower than in young subjects (P = 0.002). CAN increased ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels in both groups. In young subjects, ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels at the end of CAN infusion were higher (P
0.05) than after placebo. In elderly subjects, at the end of CAN infusion, ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels were higher (P = 0.01) than after placebo. Under CAN, ACTH and cortisol AUCs were persistently higher (P
0.01) and DHEA AUCs lower (P = 0.006) in elderly than in young subjects. Cortisol AUCs after CAN in young subjects did not become significantly different from those in elderly subjects after placebo.
Conclusions: 1) Evening-time ACTH and cortisol secretion in elderly subjects is higher than in young subjects; 2) ACTH and cortisol secretion in elderly subjects is enhanced by CAN but less than that in young subjects; and 3) DHEA hyposecretion in elderly subjects is partially restored by mineralocorticoid antagonism. Age-related variations of HPA activity may be determined by some derangement in mineralocorticoid receptors function at the hippocampal level.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glucocorticoid action is mediated by both glucocorticoid (GRs) and mineralocorticoid (MRs) receptors, with GRs being distributed throughout the brain but mostly in hypothalamic neurons and corticotroph cells (3, 4, 5), whereas MRs are present in the hypothalamus, with their highest expression being detected in the hippocampus (3). At this level, MRs lose aldosterone selectivity and bind glucocorticoids more than 10-fold higher than GRs, as demonstrated by animal in vitro studies (3, 4, 5). Hippocampal MRs play a major role in the control of the proactive glucocorticoid feedback, aimed at maintaining basal HPA activity (4). The stimulatory effect of MRs blockade by spironolactone or canrenoate (CAN), MRs antagonists, on the HPA axis has been demonstrated in both animals and humans. The systemic administration of CAN enhances spontaneous and CRH- or AVP-stimulated ACTH, cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) secretion, as well as cortisol response to physical exercise, in normal young subjects (6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Thus, the study of mineralocorticoid antagonist effects on corticotroph and adrenal secretion represents a new approach to investigating the glucocorticoid feedback effect at a suprapituitary level, i.e. likely at the hippocampal level (11).
HPA axis hyperactivity has been clearly demonstrated in aged animals and humans (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23), and, moreover, it could be involved in the structural, metabolic, and cognitive alterations of aging (12, 13, 14). In aged animals, HPA hyperactivity is likely to reflect loss of resiliency and reduced sensitivity to the negative glucocorticoid feedback, which mainly reflects hippocampal receptor damage (4, 12, 13, 14).
So far, human studies have generally been performed by studying HPA sensitivity to the negative feedback action of dexamethasone, which has difficulty crossing the blood-brain barrier (24, 25), and/or of pharmacological hydrocortisone doses (26, 27). Therefore, these experimental models might not conceptually represent the most reliable way to evaluate age-dependent variations in feedback control of HPA axis, which is mainly under central modulation.
Reduction in both basal and stimulated levels of DHEA and its sulfate is another intriguing aspect in age-related variations of HPA axis, despite hyperactivity of ACTH and cortisol secretion (22, 23, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32). Reduction in DHEA synthesis and secretion probably reflects particular atrophy of the reticularis zone of the aged adrenal gland, where specific defects in the steroidogenic pathway, namely in the activity of the 17,20-lyase, have been demonstrated (29, 33), and it could contribute to age-related changes in structure functions and metabolism (30, 34).
To clarify the role of MRs on HPA activity in normal aging, the effect of CAN on the spontaneous ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA secretion in the evening (during the nadir of the circadian HPA rhythm) was studied in a group of normal elderly subjects.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Vials containing 200 mg of potassium CAN were purchased from Knoll Farmaceutici Spa (Milan, Italy).
Study protocol
Eight elderly subjects (four women and four men; age, 75.1 ± 3.2 yr; body mass index, 22.9 ± 2.4 kg/m2) and eight young subjects (five women studied in their early follicular phase, and three men; age 25.0 ± 4.6 yr; body mass index, 22.1 ± 1.2 kg/m2) were studied. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Turin, and informed consent to participation was obtained from all subjects.
All subjects received the following treatments in random order at least 5 d apart: 1) placebo (1.0 ml of saline as an iv bolus at 2000 h, followed by 250 ml infused over 4 h up to 2400 h); and 2) CAN (200 mg as an iv bolus at 2000 h, followed by 200 mg infused in 250 ml of saline over 4 h up to 2400 h).
The tests started at 2000 h after at least 4 h fasting and 30 min after venous cannulation, kept patent by slow infusion of isotonic saline; all subjects remained awake during both testing sessions.
Blood samples from individual subjects were taken basally at 2000 h and every 15 min from 20002400 h and analyzed together; at each time point in every testing session, ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels were assayed.
Plasma ACTH levels (picograms per milliliter; 0.22 pg/ml = 1 pmol/liter) were measured in duplicate by immunoradiometric assay (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA). Assay sensitivity was 1 pg/ml; the inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation ranges were 2.48.5% and 3.99.9%, respectively.
Serum cortisol levels (micrograms per liter; 2.7 µg/liter = 1 nmol/liter) were measured in duplicate by RIA (CORT-CTK 125; DIASORIN Biomedica, Saluggia, Italy). Assay sensitivity was 4 µg/liter; inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were 6.714.6% and 5.679.95%, respectively.
Serum DHEA levels (micrograms per liter; 3.4 µg/liter = 1 nmol/liter) were measured in duplicate by RIA [DEA-DRG (Pantec) Germany]. Assay sensitivity was 0.02 µg/liter; inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation ranged from 10.6813.72% and 5.26.4%, respectively.
Statistical analysis
Hormonal responses are expressed as mean, SD, and relative 95% confidence interval (CI) of absolute values and areas under the curve (AUC20002400).
For each subject, the differences between placebo and CAN were computed at each time point, and ANOVA for repeated-measure model (Greenhouse-Geisser estimation) was used to analyze the variation of the differences among young subjects and elderly subjects in the period 20002400 h. Variations between placebo and CAN effects at each time point and differences between young and elderly subjects (separately for placebo and CAN) were compared by means of nonparametric Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively. Differences of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Analysis of differences between placebo and CAN at each time point showed a significant variation during 20002400 h, for both young (P < 0.05) and elderly (P < 0.05) subjects. Differences measured changed variably between young and elderly subjects, particularly for cortisol and DHEA (P = 0.03).
During the placebo session, in both elderly and young subjects, spontaneous ACTH and cortisol secretion showed a progressive decrease between 2000 and 2400 h (P = 0.01 in young and P
0.05 in elderly subjects), whereas DHEA levels did not change in either group. At each time point, both ACTH and cortisol levels in the elderly subjects were higher, whereas DHEA levels were lower, than those in the young subjects (P
0.05). Besides, ACTH and cortisol AUCs during placebo in the elderly subjects were higher (P
0.01), whereas the DHEA AUCs were lower, than in the young (P = 0.002) (Tables 13![]()
![]()
and Figs. 1
and 2
).
|
|
|
|
|
0.05) (Tables 13
In elderly subjects, CAN infusion slightly increased ACTH levels, with a significant difference obtained at 2400 h only (P = 0.01 vs. the same time point during placebo). In contrast to young subjects, CAN increased cortisol secretion in elderly subjects, with a significant difference starting from 2045 h (P = 0.03 vs. the same time point during placebo). Hormonal levels at the end of CAN infusion were similar to those at baseline but higher (P = 0.01) than those recorded at the same time point during placebo. Conversely, even in the elderly subjects, CAN significantly increased DHEA levels which, at the end of the infusion, resulted in higher levels (P = 0.01) than those at the same time point during placebo (Tables 2
and 3
and Fig. 1
).
Under CAN infusion, ACTH and cortisol AUCs were persistently higher (P
0.01) and DHEA AUCs lower (P = 0.006) in the elderly subjects than in the young subjects. Interestingly, cortisol AUCs after CAN in the young subjects did not become significantly different from those in the elderly subjects after placebo (Tables 13![]()
![]()
and Fig. 2
).
Side effects
CAN administration induced no significant side effects. Testing sessions never had to be stopped and/or medication withdrawn.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Spontaneous hypersecretion of ACTH and glucocorticoids has been more clearly demonstrated in aged animals (13, 14), whereas spontaneous ACTH and cortisol hypersecretion in aged humans has not been definitely proven. Some authors have found age-associated increases in basal ACTH and cortisol concentrations in terms of basal evening levels and nadirs (16, 17, 19, 35), plasma levels of free cortisol (36), whereas others have reported an elevated cortisol nadir uncoupled with ACTH nadir changes (37). Moreover, an anticipated nocturnal cortisol rise and acrophase have also been shown in aged subjects, without gender-related differences (16, 17, 38). Some studies have observed decreased basal cortisol concentrations with aging (15), whereas others have failed to observe any significant effect of age on ACTH or cortisol levels at different times of the day (25, 37, 38, 39).
Conversely, in both aged humans and animals, circulating levels of DHEA and its sulfate form, which are generally considered good ACTH secretion markers in young adulthood (40, 41), are generally reduced (22, 23, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32) as a consequence of particular age-related atrophy in the reticularis adrenal zone (29, 33).
Our findings clearly show ACTH and cortisol hypersecretion, coupled with reduced DHEA levels, in elderly subjects: whereas DHEA levels were invariably lower in the elderly subjects than in the young, evening-time ACTH and cortisol levels under placebo infusion in the elderly subjects were higher than in the young.
HPA hyperactivity in aging seems to be a consequence of refractoriness to glucocorticoid feedback, as also indicated by reduced resiliency in the ACTH and glucocorticoid response to stimuli (13, 18, 19, 26, 27). As anticipated, the negative glucocorticoid feedback is likely to act at the hippocampal level (3), and impaired hippocampal MRs might underlie the blunted inhibitory effect of glucocorticoid feedback and chronic HPA hyperactivation in aged animals (13, 14).
Reduced HPA sensitivity to the negative glucocorticoid feedback has also been demonstrated in human aging (3, 12, 13, 14, 26, 27). In fact, the inhibitory effect of dexamethasone, in contrast to hydrocortisone, was unchanged in elderly subjects (37, 42); however, dexamethasone has difficulty crossing the blood-brain barrier and is, therefore, unlikely to explore the central sensitivity to glucocorticoids (24, 25).
As anticipated, mineralocorticoid antagonists are likely to represent a new tool to investigate the glucocorticoid feedback action in both humans and animals (6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Our present results show that blockade of MRs by CAN stimulates the enhanced ACTH and, above all, cortisol secretion in normal elderly subjects; these findings, therefore, indicate that MRs still operate in the control of basal HPA function in aging, as also supported by the evidence that even the reduced DHEA levels are augmented by CAN infusion in elderly subjects.
The stimulatory effect of CAN on adrenal function is not coupled with the same strong effect on ACTH release, which is puzzling, taking into account that central stimuli of the HPA axis usually release more ACTH than cortisol (1). Direct stimulatory effect of CAN on adrenal function cannot be ruled out although some in vitro data showed an inhibitory, rather than a stimulatory, effect of spironolactone on adrenal steroidogenesis (43). Decreased cortisol clearance rate is unlikely, as suggested by the fact that cortisol metabolism is not modified by CAN in normal subjects (7). Another potential hypothesis is that CAN-induced cortisol increase might exert its feedback action mainly through GRs, partially counteracting the MRs blockade by CAN, which would blunt ACTH response.
Stimulatory action of MR antagonisms on ACTH and cortisol levels in the elderly subjects was less marked than in the young subjects, suggesting that elderly subjects are partially refractory to the stimulatory effect of MRs blockade by CAN, which would reflect age-related MRs function impairment. The latter hypothesis would explain either the increase of spontaneous nocturnal ACTH and cortisol secretion or its reduced sensitivity to the stimulatory action of MR blockade.
Furthermore, our study demonstrates that, although significantly increased, DHEA levels in the elderly are partially refractory to the stimulatory effect of MR blockade by CAN compared with young adults. As anticipated, clear reduction of both basal and ACTH-stimulated DHEA levels in elderly subjects has been demonstrated in both humans and animals (22, 23, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32), and it would reflect defects in steroidogenic pathways in the aged reticularis zone (29, 33). Because CAN has also been reported to inhibit adrenal steroidogenesis in vitro (43), it is, therefore, surprising that its infusion is able to significantly increase DHEA levels in elderly subjects. The slight DHEA response to CAN in the elderly could reflect the slight CAN-induced ACTH increase. DHEA is even stimulated by an extremely low exogenous ACTH dose (44, 45), although its response is reduced in human aging (21, 22, 23).
In conclusion, the results of this study show that elderly subjects are characterized by HPA hyperactivity that is partially refractory to the stimulatory effect of MRs blockade by CAN. Thus, age-related variations of HPA activity may be determined by some derangement in MRs function at the hippocampal level.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online July 12, 2005
Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the curve; AVP, arginine vasopressin; CAN, canrenoate; CI, confidence interval; DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; HPA, hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal; MR, mineralocorticoid receptor.
Received January 18, 2005.
Accepted July 6, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Zhang, R. Ge, C. Matte-Martone, J. Goodwin, W. D. Shlomchik, M. J. Mamula, A. Kooshkabadi, M. P. Hardy, and D. Geller Characterization of a Novel Gain of Function Glucocorticoid Receptor Knock-in Mouse J. Biol. Chem., March 6, 2009; 284(10): 6249 - 6259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |