help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2004-0699
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maedler, K.
Right arrow Articles by Donath, M. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maedler, K.
Right arrow Articles by Donath, M. Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 1 501-506
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

Sulfonylurea Induced ß-Cell Apoptosis in Cultured Human Islets

Kathrin Maedler, Richard D. Carr, Domenico Bosco, Richard A. Zuellig, Thierry Berney and Marc Y. Donath

Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes (K.M., R.A.Z., M.Y.D.), University Hospital, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Novo Nordisk A/S (R.D.C.), 2880 Bagsværd, Denmark; and Department of Surgery (D.B., T.B.), University of Geneva Medical Center, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Marc Y. Donath, M.D., Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail: marc.donath{at}usz.ch.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Loss of ß-cell mass and function raises a concern regarding the application of sulfonylureas for the treatment of type 2 diabetes because previous studies have shown that agents that cause closure of inwardly rectifying K+ sulfonylurea receptor subtype of ATP-sensitive potassium channels, such as tolbutamide and glibenclamide, induce apoptosis in ß-cell lines and rodent islets. Therefore, we investigated the effect of the new insulin secretagogues, repaglinide and nateglinide, and the sulfonylurea, glibenclamide, on ß-cell apoptosis in human islets. Human islets from six organ donors were cultured onto extracellular matrix-coated plates and exposed to glibenclamide, repaglinide, or nateglinide. The doses of the three compounds were chosen according to detected maximal effects, i.e. efficacy. Exposure of human islets for 4 h to 0.1 and 10 µM glibenclamide induced a 2.09- and 2.46-fold increase in ß-cell apoptosis, respectively, whereas repaglinide (0.01 and 1 µM) did not change the number of apoptotic ß-cells. At low concentration (10 µM), nateglinide did not induce ß-cell apoptosis. However, at high concentration of 1000 µM, it induced a 1.49-fold increase in the number of apoptotic ß-cells. Prolonged exposure for 4 d of the islets to the secretagogues induced ß-cell apoptosis. The increase was of 3.71- and 4.4-fold at 0.1 and 10 µM glibenclamide, 2.37- and 3.8-fold at 0.01 and 1 µM repaglinide, and of 3.2- and 4.6-fold at 10 and 1000 µM nateglinide, respectively. Glibenclamide at 0.1–10 nM (doses that were less efficient on insulin secretion) did not induce ß-cell apoptosis after 4 h incubation as well as 0.1 nM after 4 d incubation. However, 1 and 10 nM glibenclamide for 4 d induced a 2.24- and 2.53-fold increase in ß-cell apoptosis, respectively. Taken together, closure of the inwardly rectifying K+ sulfonylurea receptor subtype of ATP-sensitive potassium channels induces ß-cell apoptosis in human islets and may precipitate the decrease in ß-cell mass observed in patients with type 2 diabetes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS is a progressive disease. At early stages diet and exercise are usually sufficient to normalize glucose homeostasis, but oral antidiabetic drugs and insulin replacement often become necessary with time due to a decrease of the functional pancreatic ß-cell mass in the face of insulin resistance. Indeed, the contribution of a relative insulin deficiency to the establishment of overt diabetes is now widely accepted and is probably partly due to a decrease in ß-cell mass (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10).

Several physiological regulators of ß-cell function, under certain conditions, initiate ß-cell apoptosis. In a physiological environment, glucose increases the cytoplasmic free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) and stimulates insulin secretion. However, chronic elevation of blood glucose concentration impairs ß-cell function (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20) and induces ß-cell apoptosis (21, 22, 23, 24). In cultured human pancreatic islets, overstimulation by high glucose leads to a rise in [Ca2+]i, which persists after normalization of the glucose concentration (25, 26). ß-cells ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channels are octamers composed of four inwardly rectifying K+ channels and four sulfonylurea receptors. Increased intracellular glucose concentrations result in production of ATP, raising the ATP to ADP ratio, which is followed by closure of KATP channels. A decrease of K+ conductance leads to membrane depolarization, opening of voltage-operated Ca2+ channels, Ca2+ influx, rise in [Ca2+]i, and subsequently induces insulin secretion (27). Sulfonylureas block ß-cell KATP channels, simulating the effect of glucose in eliciting insulin release (28). Despite the widespread use of sulfonylureas, concerns emerge from studies in a ß-cell line and rodent islets, demonstrating that the sulfonylureas, tolbutamide and glibenclamide, may induce, Ca2+ dependently, ß-cell apoptosis (22, 29). However, the effect of sulfonylureas on ß-cell apoptosis in human islets is unknown.

The carbamoylmethyl benzoic acid derivative repaglinide and the phenylalanine derivative nateglinide represent new classes of insulin secretagogues chemically unrelated to the sulfonylureas. Repaglinide differs from the sulfonylurea in stimulating insulin secretion solely by closure of the KATP channels, whereas nateglinide and sulfonylurea act by closure of the KATP channels and stimulation of Ca2+-dependent exocytosis (30, 31). Due to distinct binding sites, the IC50 for nateglinide is in the low micromolar range (7 µM), whereas repaglinide resembles glibenclamide in producing a high-affinity block in the nanomolar range (IC50, 0.9–7 nM). In addition to their mechanistic differences, repaglinide and nateglinide are distinguished from sulfonylureas by their rapid elimination from the body, with a plasma half-life of less than 2 h.

Therefore, we investigated the short- and long-term effects of the sulfonylurea glibenclamide and the new insulin secretagogues, nateglinide and repaglinide, on ß-cell apoptosis in cultured human islets.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Islet isolation and culture

Islets were isolated from pancreases of six brain-dead multiple-organ donors at the Department of Surgery, University of Geneva Medical Center, and one organ donor at the Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital Zurich, as described (32, 33, 34). Pancreata were procured for islet isolation according to regulations and good practice rules currently applied in Switzerland. Briefly, consent was considered obtained if the potential donor carried an official organ Swisstransplant (Swiss national organ sharing agency) donor card, on which individual reservations about procurement of specific organs or tissues are explicitly mentioned. For brain-dead potential donors not carrying an organ donor card, consent was obtained orally from the closest relatives and specifically mentioning the use of the pancreas for islet isolation. Only isolated islets not suitable for transplantation were used. Islet purity was greater than 95%, as judged by dithizone staining (if this degree of purity was not primarily achieved by routine isolation, islets were hand picked). The donors, aged 38–70 yr, were heart-beating cadaver organ donors, and none had a previous history of diabetes or metabolic disorders. Groups of 20 islets were plated on extracellular matrix-coated plates derived from bovine corneal endothelial cells, allowing the islet cells to attach to the dishes and spread (Novamed Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel), and cultured in 2 ml CMRL-1066 (5.5 mM glucose) medium containing 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen Corp., Paisley, UK), hereafter referred to as culture medium. Two days after plating, when most islets were attached and began to flatten, the medium was changed to medium containing 5.5 or 11.1 mM glucose with or without insulin, nimodipine, nitrendipine (Sigma, Poole, UK), glibenclamide, repaglinide, or nateglinide (synthesized at Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark). The secretagogues were first dissolved as concentrated stock solutions in dimethylsulfoxide (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland); the final concentration of dimethylsulfoxide was less than 0.5% (vol/vol).

Immunocytochemistry

The free 3'-OH strand breaks resulting from DNA degradation were detected by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine 5-triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) technique (35) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (in situ cell death detection kit, AP; Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany) as described previously in detail (36, 37). Thereafter, islets were incubated for 30 min at 37 C with a guinea pig antiinsulin antibody (Dako, Carpinteria, CA), followed by detection using the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (Zymed Laboratories Inc., South San Francisco, CA).

Insulin release

To determine chronic insulin release, supernatants of the islets were collected and than assayed by a human insulin RIA kit (CIS Bio International, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France).

Evaluation and statistical analysis

Samples were evaluated in a randomized manner by a single investigator (K.M.) who was blinded to the treatment conditions. Care was taken to score islets of similar size. Some larger islets did not completely spread and were several cells thick. Such larger islets were excluded because a monolayer is a prerequisite for single cell evaluation (36, 37). Data were analyzed by student’s t test or by ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction for multiple group comparisons.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effects of glibenclamide on ß-cell apoptosis in human islets

Human islets were cultured on extracellular matrix-coated dishes and exposed to increasing concentrations of glibenclamide for up to 4 d. Short-term exposure of 4 h to 0.1–10 nM glibenclamide did not change the number of nuclei displaying DNA fragmentation (TUNEL-positive nuclei), compared with solvent-treated controls, but higher concentrations of 0.1 and 10 µM induced a 2.09- and 2.46-fold increase in TUNEL-positive ß-cells, compared with solvent-treated islets, respectively (Figs. 1Go, 2AGo, and 3AGo). Long-term incubation with glibenclamide for 4 d significantly increased the number of TUNEL-positive ß-cells already at concentration of 1 nM and was maximal at 10 µM (2.24-, 2.53-, 3.71-, and 4.4-fold increase at 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 10 µM, respectively, compared with solvent) (Figs. 2AGo and 3AGo). In parallel to the dose-dependent induction of ß-cell apoptosis, 4 h exposure to glibenclamide increased insulin secretion 1.32-, 1.82-, 1.87-, 3.27-, and 3.4-fold at 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 10 µM, respectively, compared with solvent (Figs. 2BGo and 3BGo). Long-term incubation for 4 d blurred the acute glibenclamide-induced increase in insulin secretion; only 0.01, 0.1, and 10 µM glibenclamide significantly increased chronic insulin secretion, by 1.67-, 2.0-, and 2.1-fold, respectively, compared with control.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Characterization of the effect of repaglinide, nateglinide, and glibenclamide on ß-cell DNA fragmentation by double staining with the TUNEL assay (alkaline phosphatase) and antiinsulin antibody (peroxidase). Human islets were cultured on extracellular matrix-coated dishes for 4 h at 5.5 mM glucose and solvent alone (control) (A) or in the presence of 0.01 µM repaglinide (B), 10 µM nateglinide (C), or 0.1 µM glibenclamide (D). The arrows indicate nuclei stained positive for the TUNEL reaction (magnification, x250)

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Glibenclamide induces ß-cell apoptosis in human islets. Human islets were cultured on extracellular matrix-coated dishes for 4 h and 4 d in 5.5 mM glucose and solvent alone or in the presence of 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 nM glibenclamide (Glib). A, Results are means ± SE of percentage of TUNEL-positive ß-cells relative to control incubations (100%; in absolute value: 0.36 ± 0.03% TUNEL-positive ß-cells). The mean number of islets scored from each donor was 42 (range 20–61) for each treatment condition. Islets were isolated from five organ donors. B, Chronic insulin release into the culture medium during the 4-h and 4-d incubation period. Results are means ± SE of the insulin secreted per islet relative to control incubations (100%, in absolute values: 0.62 ± 0.05 and 3.09 ± 0.30 pmol/islet after 4 h and 4 d, respectively). Islets were isolated from three organ donors. *, P < 0.01 relative to controls.

 


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Distinct effects of repaglinide, nateglinide, and glibenclamide on ß-cell apoptosis. Human islets were cultured on extracellular matrix-coated dishes for 4 h and 1 and 4 d in 5.5 or 11.1 mM glucose and solvent alone or in the presence of and 0.01 or 1 µM repaglinide (Repa), 10 or 1000 µM nateglinide (Nate), 0.1 or 10 µM glibenclamide (Glib), or 20 nM insulin (ins). A, Results are means ± SE of percentage of TUNEL-positive ß-cells relative to control incubations (100%; in absolute value: 0.36 ± 0.03% TUNEL-positive ß-cells). The mean number of islets scored from each donor was 45 (range 25–72) for each treatment condition. Islets were isolated from five organ donors. B, Chronic insulin release into the culture medium during the 4-h and 1- and 4-d incubation period. Results are means ± SE of the insulin secreted per islet relative to control incubations (100%, in absolute values: 0.62 ± 0.05, 1.06 ± 0.07, and 3.09 ± 0.30 pmol/islet after 4 h and 1 and 4 d, respectively). Islets were isolated from three organ donors. *, P < 0.01 relative to controls; #, P < 0.05 relative to islets exposed to 0.1 and 10 µM glibenclamide. C, Results are means ± SE of percentage of TUNEL-positive ß-cells relative to control incubations (100%; in absolute value: 0.17 ± 0.01% TUNEL-positive ß-cells). The mean number of islets scored was 35 (range 20–49) for each treatment condition. Islets were isolated from one organ donor. *, P < 0.01 relative to control at 5.5 mM glucose; **, P < 0.01 relative to control at 11.1 mM glucose.

 
To investigate whether glibenclamide induced ß-cell apoptosis requires Ca2+ influx, islets were coincubated with the L-type Ca2+ channel blockers, nitrendipine and nimodipine. At a concentration of 1 µM, both drugs inhibited the deleterious effects of a 4-d exposure to 0.1 µM glibenclamide; however, this protective effect failed to reach statistical significance after 4 h (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Glibenclamide-induced ß-cell apoptosis requires L-type Ca2+ influx. Human islets were cultured on extracellular matrix-coated dishes for 4 h and 4 d in 5.5 mM glucose and solvent alone or in the presence of 0.1 µM glibenclamide (Glib) with or without 1 µM nitrendipine (Nitr) or 1 µM nimodipine (Nimo). Results are means ± SE of percentage of TUNEL-positive ß-cells relative to control incubations at 5.5 mM glucose alone (100%; in absolute value: 0.17 ± 0.01% TUNEL-positive ß-cells). The mean number of islets scored was 35 (range 20–49) for each treatment condition. Islets were isolated from one organ donor. *, P < 0.01 relative to controls; #, P < 0.05 relative to islets exposed to 0.1 µM glibenclamide.

 
Effects of repaglinide, nateglinide, and insulin, compared with glibenclamide, on ß-cell apoptosis

The effects of glibenclamide on ß-cell apoptosis were compared with those of repaglinide and nateglinide. We chose the lowest concentration of glibenclamide inducing ß-cell apoptosis after 4 h exposure (0.1 µM, see above) and compared its effect with repaglinide and nateglinide at doses of similar efficacy in stimulating ß-cell insulin secretion. After 4 h of exposure, 0.01 and 1 µM repaglinide as well as 10 µM of nateglinide did not induce ß-cell apoptosis (Figs. 1Go and 3AGo). Suprisingly,1 µM repaglinide even decreased baseline apoptosis by 30%. Only a higher concentration of nateglinide (1 mM) significantly increased ß-cell apoptosis 1.5-fold, an increase that was much lower than the dose-corresponding glibenclamide-induced ß-cell apoptosis (Fig. 3AGo). After 24 h of exposure, 0.01 µM repaglinide did not significantly change ß-cell apoptosis, but higher doses of 1 µM repaglinide and 10–1000 µM nateglinide increased ß-cell apoptosis 1.9-, 1.6-, and 2.6-fold, respectively. In comparison, exposure to 0.1 and 10 µM glibenclamide for the same period of 24 h increased the number of apoptotic ß-cells 2.5- and 2.7-fold. After 4 d of exposure, all added insulin secretagogues increased ß-cell apoptosis, compared with solvent-treated controls (Fig. 3AGo). The increase was 2.37- and 3.8-fold at 0.01 and 1 µM repaglinide and 3.2- and 4.6-fold at 10 and 1000 µM nateglinide, respectively. Assaying chronic insulin secretion revealed no differences in efficacy to increase secretion among the three secretagogues for exposures of 4–24 h, whereas prolonged exposure for 4 d maintained a significant increase only in glibenclamide-treated islets (Fig. 3BGo).

Next the effect of exogenous insulin and increased glucose concentration were studied. At 100 mg/dl (5.5 mM) glucose, exposure to 20 nM exogenous insulin had no significant effect on ß-cell apoptosis (Fig. 3CGo). However, insulin partially protected the ß-cells from apoptosis induced by a 4-d exposure to 200 mg/dl (11.1 mM) glucose. In contrast, closure of the KATP channels with nateglinide, repaglinide, and glibenclamide tended to increase glucose-induced ß-cell apoptosis, an effect that reached statistical significance only for 10 µM glibenclamide (Fig. 3CGo).

Finally, to mimic the intermittent effects of the in vivo treatment, cultured human islets were exposed to repaglinide and nateglinide every 6 h for a period of 2 h over a period of 3 d and compared with islets with the same number of medium changes. Analysis of ß-cell apoptosis revealed no significant increase of ß-cell apoptosis after the intermittent exposure of repaglinide and nateglinide (0.13 ± 0.03% TUNEL-positive ß-cells at 5.5 mM glucose alone vs. 0.19 ± 0.08 and 0.28 ± 0.09 at 0.01 and 1 µM repaglinide and 0.19 ± 0.08 and 0.28 ± 0.12 at 10 and 1000 µM nateglinide, respectively).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Recent studies convincingly highlight the shortcoming of ß-cell mass in type 2 diabetes mass (2, 7, 8, 10). It follows that drugs increasing the rate of ß-cell apoptosis may have deleterious effects in the long term, precipitating insulin requirement. In the present study, we show that the sulfonylurea glibenclamide induces ß-cell apoptosis in human islets. This effect was observed in vitro, but it may, nevertheless, be of potential clinical importance because the concentrations that produced effects in our experiments are within the range encountered in plasma of treated patients. Indeed, peak plasma concentrations for glibenclamide, in doses of 2.5 mg, are 72 ng/ml (0.15 µM) (38), and exposure of isolated human islets to 0.1 µM glibenclamide for 4 h significantly induced ß-cell apoptosis with prolonged exposure for 4 d being even more deleterious. When one considers that treatment with glibenclamide is often maintained over several years, there emerges a need to study the relevance of this effect in vivo. Butler et al. (2) quantified relative ß-cell volume in type 2 diabetic patients treated with diet, sulfonylureas, or insulin. Whereas they did observe a decrease in ß-cell volume in sulfonylurea-treated patients, compared with diet only, the ß-cell volume did not differ from that of insulin-treated patients. However, it was not stated whether the insulin-treated patient group previously received sulfonylureas, but based on current treatment strategies, it is most probable. In an important recent prospective study comparing insulin and sulfonylurea treatment of type 2 diabetes, it was shown that treatment with insulin preserved ß-cell function more effectively than glibenclamide (39). It remains to be established whether it is the beneficial effects per se of insulin or possible ß-cell toxicity of glibenclamide that accounts for this observation. Whereas a deterioration of insulin secretion was seen in patients treated with sulfonylurea in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study, those treated with insulin were not evaluated in this regard (40).

Given the observed possible deleterious effects of glibenclamide, alternative insulin secretagogues may have to be considered. Peak plasma concentrations for nateglinide, in doses of 120 mg, are 19.1 µM (41), whereas in vitro exposure of human islets for 4 h to 10 µM did not and 1000 µM only slightly increase the ß-cell apoptosis rate. Peak plasma concentrations for 2 mg repaglinide are 0.08 µM (42), and even a 1 µM repaglinide exposure of cultured islets for 4 h had no deleterious effects on ß-cell survival. Thus, although both drugs have effects similar to glibenclamide in terms of stimulating insulin secretion, it appears that nateglinide and repaglinide are less toxic for ß-cells. This is in line with previous findings demonstrating other distinct effects among sulfonylurea, repaglinide, and nateglinide (31, 43, 44, 45). The reason for these differences may be related to different binding characteristics to the KATP channels (30, 31, 46). Indeed, repaglinide differs from the sulfonylurea in stimulating insulin secretion solely by closure of the KATP channels, whereas nateglinide and sulfonylurea act by closure of the KATP channels and stimulation of Ca2+-dependent exocytosis. Because Ca2+ is a typical mediator of apoptosis, differences in Ca2+ handling may translate in different sensitivity to apoptotic signals.

In summary, for the duration of their respective circulating half-lives, glibenclamide but not repaglinide and nateglinide induces ß-cell apoptosis in human islets. Thus, and all other things being equal, short-acting insulin secretagogues may be preferred to long-acting ones due to the fact that patients will be less exposed to proapoptotic stimuli during protracted treatment with short-acting agents. Clearly, the present in vitro study of human islets needs in vivo confirmation because several additional factors including ß-cell proliferation and regeneration may compensate for glibenclamide-induced apoptosis. However, if these findings translate to patients with type 2 diabetes, sulfonylureas may have adverse effects on ß-cell mass.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank G. Siegfried-Kellenberger and I. Dannenmann for technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark, and the Swiss National Science Foundation Grants 3200-067049.01 and PP00B-68874/1. K.M. is the recipient of a Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship.

First Published Online October 13, 2004

Abbreviations: [Ca2+]i, Cytoplasmic free Ca2+ concentration; KATP, ATP-sensitive K+ (channels); TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine 5-triphosphate nick-end labeling.

Received April 13, 2004.

Accepted October 4, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bonner-Weir S 2000 Islet growth and development in the adult. J Mol Endocrinol 24:297–302[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Butler AE, Janson J, Bonner-Weir S, Ritzel R, Rizza RA, Butler PC 2003 ß-Cell deficit and increased ß-cell apoptosis in humans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 52:102–110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cerasi E 1995 Insulin deficiency and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of NIDDM: is a divorce possible? Diabetologia 38:992–997[Medline]
  4. Donath MY, Storling J, Maedler K, Mandrup-Poulsen T 2003 Inflammatory mediators and islet ß-cell failure: a link between type 1 and type 2 diabetes. J Mol Med 81:455–470[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Donath MY, Halban PA 2004 Decreased ß-cell mass in diabetes: significance, mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Diabetologia 47:581–589[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Gerich JE 2000 Insulin resistance is not necessarily an essential component of type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2113–2115[Free Full Text]
  7. Kloppel G, Lohr M, Habich K, Oberholzer M, Heitz PU 1985 Islet pathology and the pathogenesis of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus revisited. Surv Synth Pathol Res 4:110–125[Medline]
  8. Sakuraba H, Mizukami H, Yagihashi N, Wada R, Hanyu C, Yagihashi S 2002 Reduced ß-cell mass and expression of oxidative stress-related DNA damage in the islet of Japanese type II diabetic patients. Diabetologia 45:85–96[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Taylor SI, Accili D, Imai Y 1994 Insulin resistance or insulin deficiency. Which is the primary cause of NIDDM? Diabetes 43:735–740[Medline]
  10. Yoon KH, Ko SH, Cho JH, Ahn YB, Song KH, Yoo SJ, Kang MI, Cha BY, Lee KW, Son HY, Kang SK, Kim HS, Lee IK, Bonner-Weir S 2003 Selective ß-cell loss and {alpha}-cell expansion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Korea. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:2300–2308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Weir GC, Clore ET, Zmachinski CJ, Bonner-Weir S 1981 Islet secretion in a new experimental model for non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes 30:590–595[Abstract]
  12. Bonner-Weir S, Trent DF, Weir GC 1983 Partial pancreatectomy in the rat and subsequent defect in glucose-induced insulin release. J Clin Invest 71:1544–1553
  13. Leahy JL, Cooper HE, Deal DA, Weir GC 1986 Chronic hyperglycemia is associated with impaired glucose influence on insulin secretion. A study in normal rats using chronic in vivo glucose infusions. J Clin Invest 77:908–915
  14. Unger RH, Grundy S 1985 Hyperglycaemia as an inducer as well as a consequence of impaired islet cell function and insulin resistance: implications for the management of diabetes. Diabetologia 28:119–121[Medline]
  15. Eizirik DL, Korbutt GS, Hellerstrom C 1992 Prolonged exposure of human pancreatic islets to high glucose concentrations in vitro impairs the ß-cell function. J Clin Invest 90:1263–1268
  16. Kaiser N, Corcos AP, Sarel I, Cerasi E 1991 Monolayer culture of adult rat pancreatic islets on extracellular matrix: modulation of ß-cell function by chronic exposure to high glucose. Endocrinology 129:2067–2076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Marshak S, Leibowitz G, Bertuzzi F, Socci C, Kaiser N, Gross DJ, Cerasi E, Melloul D 1999 Impaired ß-cell functions induced by chronic exposure of cultured human pancreatic islets to high glucose. Diabetes 48:1230–1236[Abstract]
  18. Robertson RP 1989 Type II diabetes, glucose "non-sense," and islet desensitization. Diabetes 38:1501–1505[Abstract]
  19. Rossetti L, Giaccari A, DeFronzo RA 1990 Glucose toxicity. Diabetes Care 13:610–630[Abstract]
  20. Ling Z, Kiekens R, Mahler T, Schuit FC, Pipeleers-Marichal M, Sener A, Kloppel G, Malaisse WJ, Pipeleers DG 1996 Effects of chronically elevated glucose levels on the functional properties of rat pancreatic ß-cells. Diabetes 45:1774–1782[Abstract]
  21. Donath MY, Gross DJ, Cerasi E, Kaiser N 1999 Hyperglycemia-induced ß-cell apoptosis in pancreatic islets of Psammomys obesus during development of diabetes. Diabetes 48:738–744[Abstract]
  22. Efanova IB, Zaitsev SV, Zhivotovsky B, Kohler M, Efendic S, Orrenius S, Berggren PO 1998 Glucose and tolbutamide induce apoptosis in pancreatic ß-cells. A process dependent on intracellular Ca2+ concentration. J Biol Chem 273:33501–33507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Federici M, Hribal M, Perego L, Ranalli M, Caradonna Z, Perego C, Usellini L, Nano R, Bonini P, Bertuzzi F, Marlier LN, Davalli AM, Carandente O, Pontiroli AE, Melino G, Marchetti P, Lauro R, Sesti G, Folli F 2001 High glucose causes apoptosis in cultured human pancreatic islets of Langerhans: a potential role for regulation of specific Bcl family genes toward an apoptotic cell death program. Diabetes 50:1290–1301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Maedler K, Spinas GA, Lehmann R, Sergeev P, Weber M, Fontana A, Kaiser N, Donath MY 2001 Glucose induces ß-cell apoptosis via upregulation of the Fas-receptor in human islets. Diabetes 50:1683–1690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Grill V, Bjorklund A 2001 Overstimulation and ß-cell function. Diabetes 50(Suppl 1):S122–S124
  26. Bjorklund A, Lansner A, Grill VE 2000 Glucose-induced [Ca2+]i abnormalities in human pancreatic islets: important role of overstimulation. Diabetes 49:1840–1848[Abstract]
  27. Henquin JC 2000 Triggering and amplifying pathways of regulation of insulin secretion by glucose. Diabetes 49:1751–1760[Abstract]
  28. Rosak C 2002 The pathophysiologic basis of efficacy and clinical experience with the new oral antidiabetic agents. J Diabetes Complications 16:123–132[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Iwakura T, Fujimoto S, Kagimoto S, Inada A, Kubota A, Someya Y, Ihara Y, Yamada Y, Seino Y 2000 Sustained enhancement of Ca(2+) influx by glibenclamide induces apoptosis in RINm5F cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 271:422–428[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Fuhlendorff J, Rorsman P, Kofod H, Brand CL, Rolin B, MacKay P, Shymko R, Carr RD 1998 Stimulation of insulin release by repaglinide and glibenclamide involves both common and distinct processes. Diabetes 47:345–351[Abstract]
  31. Hansen AM, Christensen IT, Hansen JB, Carr RD, Ashcroft FM, Wahl P 2002 Differential interactions of nateglinide and repaglinide on the human ß-cell sulphonylurea receptor 1. Diabetes 51:2789–2795[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Linetsky E, Bottino R, Lehmann R, Alejandro R, Inverardi L, Ricordi C 1997 Improved human islet isolation using a new enzyme blend, liberase. Diabetes 46:1120–1123[Abstract]
  33. Oberholzer J, Triponez F, Mage R, Andereggen E, Buhler L, Cretin N, Fournier B, Goumaz C, Lou J, Philippe J, Morel P 2000 Human islet transplantation: lessons from 13 autologous and 13 allogeneic transplantations. Transplantation 69:1115–1123[Medline]
  34. Ricordi C, Lacy PE, Finke EH, Olack BJ, Scharp DW 1988 Automated method for isolation of human pancreatic islets. Diabetes 37:413–420[Abstract]
  35. Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson SA 1992 Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation. J Cell Biol 119:493–501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Maedler K, Fontana A, Ris F, Sergeev P, Toso C, Oberholzer J, Lehmann R, Bachmann F, Tasinato A, Spinas GA, Halban PA, Donath MY 2002 FLIP switches Fas-mediated glucose signaling in human pancreatic ß cells from apoptosis to cell replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8236–8241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Maedler K, Sergeev P, Ris F, Oberholzer J, Joller-Jemelka HI, Spinas GA, Kaiser N, Halban PA, Donath MY 2002 Glucose-induced ß-cell production of interleukin-1ß contributes to glucotoxicity in human pancreatic islets. J Clin Invest 110:851–860[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Jaber LA, Antal EJ, Slaughter RL, Welshman IR 1994 Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of short- and long-term glyburide therapy in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 17:1300–1306[Abstract]
  39. Alvarsson M, Sundkvist G, Lager I, Henricsson M, Berntorp K, Fernqvist-Forbes E, Steen L, Westermark G, Westermark P, Orn T, Grill V 2003 Beneficial effects of insulin versus sulphonylurea on insulin secretion and metabolic control in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 26:2231–2237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. 1995 U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 16. Overview of 6 years’ therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Diabetes 44:1249–1258
  41. Kalbag JB, Walter YH, Nedelman JR, McLeod JF 2001 Mealtime glucose regulation with nateglinide in healthy volunteers: comparison with repaglinide and placebo. Diabetes Care 24:73–77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Schumacher S, Abbasi I, Weise D, Hatorp V, Sattler K, Sieber J, Hasslacher C 2001 Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of repaglinide in patients with type 2 diabetes and renal impairment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 57:147–152[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Vinambres C, Villanueva-Penacarrillo ML, Valverde I, Malaisse WJ 1996 Repaglinide preserves nutrient-stimulated biosynthetic activity in rat pancreatic islets. Pharmacol Res 34:83–85[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Malaisse-Lagae F, Malaisse WJ 1996 Fate of 3H- and 14C-labelled A-4166 in pancreatic islets. Acta Diabetol 33:298–300[Medline]
  45. Gromada J, Bokvist K, Hoy M, Olsen HL, Lindstrom P, Hansen BS, Gotfredsen CF, Rorsman P, Thomsen MK 2002 Nateglinide, but not repaglinide, stimulates growth hormone release in rat pituitary cells by inhibition of K channels and stimulation of cyclic AMP-dependent exocytosis. Eur J Endocrinol 147:133–142[Abstract]
  46. Chachin M, Yamada M, Fujita A, Matsuoka T, Matsushita K, Kurachi Y 2003 Nateglinide, a D-phenylalanine derivative lacking either a sulfonylurea or benzamido moiety, specifically inhibits pancreatic ß-cell-type K(ATP) channels. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 304:1025–1032[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiabetesHome page
C. P. Tan, Y. Feng, Y.-P. Zhou, G. J. Eiermann, A. Petrov, C. Zhou, S. Lin, G. Salituro, P. Meinke, R. Mosley, et al.
Selective Small-Molecule Agonists of G Protein-Coupled Receptor 40 Promote Glucose-Dependent Insulin Secretion and Reduce Blood Glucose in Mice
Diabetes, August 1, 2008; 57(8): 2211 - 2219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. Massi-Benedetti and M. Orsini-Federici
Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes With Combined Therapy: What are the pros and cons?
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2008; 31(Supplement_2): S131 - S135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. Y. Donath, D. M. Schumann, M. Faulenbach, H. Ellingsgaard, A. Perren, and J. A. Ehses
Islet Inflammation in Type 2 Diabetes: From metabolic stress to therapy
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2008; 31(Supplement_2): S161 - S164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Hambrock, C. B. de Oliveira Franz, S. Hiller, A. Grenz, S. Ackermann, D. U. Schulze, G. Drews, and H. Osswald
Resveratrol Binds to the Sulfonylurea Receptor (SUR) and Induces Apoptosis in a SUR Subtype-specific Manner
J. Biol. Chem., February 2, 2007; 282(5): 3347 - 3356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. Hambrock, C. B. de Oliveira Franz, S. Hiller, and H. Osswald
Glibenclamide-Induced Apoptosis Is Specifically Enhanced by Expression of the Sulfonylurea Receptor Isoform SUR1 but Not by Expression of SUR2B or the Mutant SUR1(M1289T)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2006; 316(3): 1031 - 1037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Kwon, C. A. Marshall, H. Liu, K. L. Pappan, M. S. Remedi, and M. L. McDaniel
Glucose-stimulated DNA Synthesis through Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Is Regulated by KATP Channels: EFFECTS ON CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION IN RODENT ISLETS
J. Biol. Chem., February 10, 2006; 281(6): 3261 - 3267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
T. Tuomi, E. H. Honkanen, B. Isomaa, L. Sarelin, and L. C. Groop
Improved Prandial Glucose Control With Lower Risk of Hypoglycemia With Nateglinide Than With Glibenclamide in Patients With Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young Type 3
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2006; 29(2): 189 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
M. Y. Donath, J. A. Ehses, K. Maedler, D. M. Schumann, H. Ellingsgaard, E. Eppler, and M. Reinecke
Mechanisms of {beta}-Cell Death in Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes, December 1, 2005; 54(suppl_2): S108 - S113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
P. Rorsman
Review: Insulin secretion: function and therapy of pancreatic beta-cells in diabetes
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, July 1, 2005; 5(4): 187 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maedler, K.
Right arrow Articles by Donath, M. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maedler, K.
Right arrow Articles by Donath, M. Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals