help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rae, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rae, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, S. G.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 89, No. 9 4538-4544
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

Antiinflammatory Steroid Action in Human Ovarian Surface Epithelial Cells

Michael T. Rae, Deborah Niven, Hilary O. D. Critchley, Christopher R. Harlow and Stephen G. Hillier

Centre for Reproductive Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Michael T. Rae, Ph.D., Centre for Reproductive Biology, University of Edinburgh, Chancellors Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, United Kingdom. E-mail: mrae1{at}staffmail.ed.ac.uk.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The human ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) is subject to serial injury and repair during ovulation, which is a natural inflammatory event. We asked whether there is a compensatory antiinflammatory component to this process, involving steroid hormones produced locally at the time of ovulation. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of total RNA from cultured human OSE cell monolayers showed that exposure to proinflammatory IL1{alpha} (500 pg/ml) increased mRNA levels of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) (P < 0.01) at 48 h. The COX-2 mRNA response to IL1{alpha} was associated with an approximate 18-fold (P < 0.01) increase in mRNA levels of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11ßHSD1), encoding the steroid dehydrogenase that reversibly reduces cortisone to antiinflammatory cortisol. Addition of cortisol to OSE cell culture medium dose-dependently suppressed the COX-2 mRNA response to IL1{alpha} (P < 0.01) but reciprocally enhanced the 11ßHSD1 mRNA response (P < 0.05), with both effects strongest at 1 µM cortisol. Presence of glucocorticoid receptor-{alpha} mRNA and protein was established in OSE cell monolayers and treatment with IL1{alpha} shown to significantly up-regulate the glucocorticoid receptor-{alpha} mRNA level (P < 0.05). Glucocorticoid receptor antagonist (RU486, 10 µM) fully reversed the inhibitory effect of 1 µM cortisol on IL1{alpha}-stimulated COX-2 mRNA expression. Progesterone also suppressed IL1{alpha}-induced COX-2 mRNA expression but had no significant effect on IL1{alpha}-stimulated 11ßHSD1 expression. These data provide direct evidence for antiinflammatory actions of cortisol and progesterone in human OSE cells.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE HUMAN OVARIAN surface epithelium (OSE) is a simple, squamous-to-cuboidal cell layer covering the entire ovary that is breached and regenerated every time a follicle ovulates (1). Although the OSE is required for proteolytic remodeling of ovarian surface (2, 3), any other contribution to ovulation remains unknown. What is known is that there is a positive association between frequency of ovulation and the incidence of ovarian cancer, and at least 90% of ovarian cancers are thought to be derived from the OSE (1, 4). Thus, it is imperative to understand the normal functioning of OSE cells during ovulation, permitting mechanisms of neoplastic transformation to be investigated and new diagnostic markers of disease progression identified.

Ovulation can be seen as a natural inflammatory process (5, 6), which if inadequately resolved may give rise to genetic damage of the OSE and predispose to development of ovarian epithelial cancer (7). Experimental evidence exists that OSE cells do indeed suffer inflammation-associated DNA damage during ovulation (8), implying that mechanisms normally exist to minimize this potentially deleterious process. Recently we reported that an ovulation-associated cytokine, IL1{alpha} (9, 10), causes increased expression of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11ßHSD1) mRNA expression in human primary OSE cell cultures (11). This translated functionally into increased rates of conversion of cortisone to cortisol by OSE cells in vitro (11), consistent with the intracellular steroidogenic properties of 11ßHSD1 (12). Because of the established role of cortisol as an antiinflammatory agent (13), we postulated a role for ovulation-associated up-regulation of 11ßHSD1 in creating a steroidal milieu that counteracts inflammation at the time of ovulation (14). Here we provide direct support for the hypothesis that cortisol exerts antiinflammatory actions in OSE cells. These actions include up-regulation of cytokine-induced 11ßHSD1 itself, providing a means to sustain the regeneration of antiinflammatory cortisol at its site of action on the ovarian surface.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

OSE cells were obtained from the ovaries of 16 premenopausal women undergoing surgery for nonmalignant gynecological conditions. All patients had given informed consent, and the study had local ethics committee approval. Details of the patients and the analyses done on their OSE cells are given in Table 1Go. None of these subjects were receiving medications that would have been likely to influence ovarian function. Cells were collected at laparotomy by gentle scraping of the ovarian surface with a sterile wooden spatula, which was then rinsed into sterile, warmed OSE-1 culture media, as described previously (15). Cells were collected as near to the beginning of the surgical procedure as practicable to avoid any contamination with blood cells. Collections were then examined by phase-contrast microscopy to verify that a representative biopsy of the OSE had been recovered.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Patient and experimental details

 
Establishment of primary OSE cell monolayers

All tissue culture reagents were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. (Renfrewshire, UK) and Sigma Chemical Co. (Poole, Dorset, UK). OSE scrapings were cultured in donor calf serum-precoated flasks (75 cm2, Corning Inc. Glass Works, Corning, NY). Culture media (OSE 1) consisted of Medium199:MCDB105 (1:1 vol/vol) supplemented with fetal calf serum (15% vol/vol), streptomycin (50 µg/ml), penicillin (50 IU/ml), and L-glutamine (2 mmol/liter). Cells were incubated at 37 C in a humidified incubator under an atmosphere of 95% air, 5% CO2 for up to 28 d, with media renewed every 7 d. Confluent cell monolayers are usually obtained within 21 d using this system (15). Monolayers were routinely examined by phase-contrast microscopy for contaminating cells such as fibroblasts. Confirmation of cell purity was obtained in selected cases by immunocytochemical staining for cytokeratin 5, 6, 8, and 17 (11) using a commercially available monoclonal antihuman cytokeratin antibody (Dako, Ely, Cambridgeshire, UK).

Experimental treatment of OSE cell cultures

Confluent OSE cell monolayers were treated with trypsin-EDTA in Hanks’ balanced salt solution (0.05% wt/vol trypsin, 0.5 mM EDTA, Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) at 37 C for 5 min. Cells were then collected by centrifugation at 800 x g for 5 min. This pellet was washed in fresh OSE1 media and then resuspended in fresh media. Cell numbers and viability were determined by trypan-blue (Sigma) exclusion counting in a hemocytometer; viability ranged from 75 to 95%. Cell suspension volume was adjusted to yield 50,000 cells per 500 µl medium. Equal portions (500 µl) of the cell suspension were distributed in 24-well polystyrene culture plates (Corning) and incubated for 24 h. The medium was then aspirated and replaced with serum-free OSE1 media, containing 0.01% BSA (Sigma) (OSE2). After 24 h, experimental treatments were added to wells and the culture routinely continued for a further 48 h. Time-course studies included, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-h treatments, with untreated controls at each time point. IL1{alpha} (R&D Systems Europe Ltd., Abingdon, Oxon, UK) at a final (well) concentration of 500 pg/ml was predissolved in OSE2. The rationale for choosing this fixed dose of IL1{alpha} is based on our previously published data showing 500 pg/ml to be maximally effective in induction of 11ßHSD1 expression (11). Cortisol or progesterone was dissolved in ethanol and added to cultures such that a concentration of ethanol in culture wells was kept constant at 0.02% (control wells received ethanol alone). The steroid concentration range (0.01–1 µM) was based on published ranges of cortisol concentrations in serum and follicular fluid in women undergoing in vitro fertilization with exogenous gonadotrophins (16). Similar concentrations of progesterone were selected for comparison, bearing in mind that ovarian progesterone concentrations exceed these doses significantly during the luteal phase. After the 48-h treatment period, total RNA was extracted from OSE cell monolayers for RT-PCR analysis as described below. To delineate glucocorticoid effects mediated by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) from those mediated by the mineralocorticoid receptor, selected experiments were performed in the presence of a 10-fold molar excess of the GR antagonist RU486. Each set of experiments was performed a minimum of three times using cells donated from three different patients. The actual number of times each experiment was replicated is detailed in the figure legends.

RNA extraction and quality analysis

RNA was extracted from OSE cells using RNeasy minispin columns (Qiagen, Crawley, West Sussex, UK) as per manufacturer’s protocols. Aliquots (1 µl) of purified RNA were removed for quantification and quality assessment. RNA was quantified and quality assessed using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer system for total RNA in combination with RNA6000nano chips (Agilent Technologies, Cheshire, UK). Only RNA that displayed intact 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA peaks was reverse transcribed to cDNA for real-time PCR analysis. This quality control step was included for each experimental run to avoid generation of false-negative results due to RNA degradation before and during extraction steps, and also as a quantification method to ensure equal amounts of RNA were reverse transcribed in each RT reaction.

Real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA (1 µg) was DNAase treated (1 U) (Invitrogen) before analysis. DNAase-treated RNA (200 ng) was reverse transcribed (random hexamer kit; Applied Biosystems, Warrington, Cheshire, UK), and 2 µl of the reverse transcription (RT) mix was analyzed. cDNA was analyzed in a reaction mixture (final volume 25 µl) containing 300 nmol/liter primers and 200 nmol/liter TaqMan hybridization probe (Biosource UK Ltd., Nivelles, Belgium). Primers and probes were designed using Primer-Express software (Perkin-Elmer, Beaconsfield, Bucks, UK). Target mRNA was quantified in relation to the abundance of 18S rRNA in each sample. The positive controls were human liver total RNA (Ambion, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, UK) and in-house prepared human placental mRNA. The negative controls consisted of RT-negative (RNA template with no reverse transcriptase enzyme) and RT-H2O (water in place of RNA template). A Taqman reaction-negative control (water in place of cDNA) was also included. The sequences of all primer and probe sets used are shown in Table 2Go. All primer/probe sets were validated before use.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Primer and probe sequences used for real-time PCR gene expression analyses

 
RT-PCR of glucocorticoid receptor isoforms

OSE cell RNA from unstimulated cultures was reverse transcribed (Superscript RT, Invitrogen) with Oligo-dT priming (Invitrogen) as per the manufacturer’s protocols. Resulting cDNA was PCR amplified with primers specific to GR{alpha} and GRß isoforms (17, 18). Promega complete PCR mix was used in a total reaction volume of 50 µl. PCR products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel containing 0.002% ethidium bromide (Sigma) under UV light.

Immunohistochemistry

Cultured OSE cells were fixed in neutral buffered formalin for 10 min at room temperature followed by washing in 0.05% triton-x-100 (Sigma) for 20 min at 37 C. After triplicate 3-min washes in PBS, cells were sequentially blocked with avidin (Vector, Peterborough, UK), biotin (Vector), and nonimmune serum (horse, Vector). Mouse-antihuman GR (Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) serum was then applied at 1:100 dilution for 1 h at 37 C. After three washes with PBS+0.01% Tween 20 (Sigma) (3 min each), secondary antibody (horse-antimouse) diluted in nonimmune horse serum was applied for 1 h at room temperature. Sequential washes with PBS+0.01% Tween 20 (three x 3 min) were then performed before incubating with Vector-ABC Elite reagents and visualization via chromagen (diaminobenzidine) staining. Negative controls consisting of nonimmune mouse IgG2 substituted for primary antiserum were run routinely.

Statistical analyses

Treatment differences were analyzed by ANOVA. Specific treatment effects were analyzed by Fisher’s protected least significant difference and Student’s t test after logarithmic (base 10) transformation. Contrasts between treatments and untreated controls were considered significant at P < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Induction of inflammation-associated genes in OSE cell cultures

Ovarian surface epithelial cell cultures from three patients were used to establish the time dependence of inflammation-associated gene expression in response to treatment with IL1{alpha} (500 pg/ml). Results showed consistent trends toward increased expression of both cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and 11ßHSD1 mRNA with duration of treatment (Fig. 1Go). Expression of COX-2 mRNA was maximal at 6 h (P < 0.01), falling thereafter but remaining significantly elevated (~18-fold) at 48 h (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1AGo). Levels of 11ßHSD1 mRNA were significantly increased (P < 0.05) at 12 and 24 h and maximally stimulated (~16-fold) at 48 h (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1BGo). Cultured OSE cells contained low levels of 11ßHSD2 that were unaltered by any treatment with IL1{alpha} (data not shown). Because 11ßHSD1 mRNA expression is the reference response to IL1{alpha} in this OSE cell culture system (11 11A ), treatment duration was fixed at 48 h for all subsequent experiments.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Time-dependent effect of IL1{alpha} on the expression of COX-2 and 11ßHSD1 mRNA in cultured OSE cells. OSE cell cultures from three individuals were treated with 500 pg/ml IL1{alpha} and total RNA isolated for Taqman RT-PCR analysis of COX-2 (A) and 11ßHSD1 mRNA (B) at the times indicated. Results are presented as fold increase relative to the corresponding untreated control at each time point (mean ± SEM, n = 3 patients). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

 
Interaction between IL1{alpha} and cortisol on COX-2, 11ßHSD2 mRNA expression in OSE cell cultures

OSE cultures from six patients were used to investigate interactions between IL1{alpha} (500 pg/ml) and cortisol (0.01–1.0 µM) on COX-2 and 11ßHSD mRNA expression (Fig. 2Go). Treatment with cytokine alone for 48 h induced an average 16-fold (P < 0.01) increase in COX-2 mRNA. Cortisol alone had no effect but when combined with IL1{alpha} caused concentration-dependent suppression of COX-2 mRNA to a level not significantly different from nonstimulated control values at all doses tested (Fig. 2AGo).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Interaction between cortisol and IL1{alpha} on expression of COX-2 and 11ßHSD1 mRNA by cultured OSE cells. Cultured OSE cells were treated for 48 h with 500 pg/ml IL1{alpha}, in the presence and absence of increasing concentrations of cortisol, as indicated. Taqman RT-PCR analysis was performed on total RNA to determine expression of COX-2 (A; n = 5 patients) and 11ßHSD1 mRNA (B; n = 6 patients). Bars represent average (± SEM) values. Dissimilar superscripts above bars denote significantly different values (P < 0.01).

 
IL1{alpha} alone also induced substantial (average 20-fold, P < 0.01) increases in 11ßHSD1 mRNA expression at 48 h (Fig. 2BGo). Cortisol alone had no effect but caused striking, dose-dependent enhancement of 11ßHSD1 in the presence of IL1{alpha}, which was maximal at 1 µM cortisol (P < 0.01).

There was no measurable effect of cortisol or any interaction between cortisol and IL1{alpha} on expression of 11ßHSD2 mRNA (data not shown).

Inhibitory action of GR antagonist RU486 on antiinflammatory cortisol action in OSE cell cultures

The mode of antiinflammatory cortisol action in OSE cells was explored using OSE cells from a further three patients (Fig. 3Go). Presence of a 10-fold molar excess of the GR antagonist RU486 (10 µM) in medium containing 1 µM cortisol + 500 pg/ml IL1{alpha} totally reversed the inhibitory effect of cortisol on IL1{alpha}-induced COX-2 mRNA expression at 48 h in all three patients (P < 0.05, compared with IL1{alpha} alone).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. RU486 prevents inhibition by cortisol of IL1{alpha}-stimulated COX-2 mRNA expression in OSE cells. Cultured OSE cells were treated for 48 h with IL1{alpha} (500 pg/ml) and/or 1 µM cortisol, in the presence and absence of 10 µM RU486. COX-2 mRNA was determined by Taqman RT-PCR. Bars indicate average (± SEM) results of determinations on cells from three patients. Dissimilar superscripts above bars denote significantly different values (P < 0.05).

 
Expression of GR isoforms in OSE cell cultures

In five of five patients, cultured OSE cells tested by RT-PCR were positive for GR{alpha} mRNA (Fig. 4Go, upper panel) and negative for GRß mRNA (data not shown). Immunohistochemical staining with antihuman GR serum confirmed the expression of GR protein (Fig. 4Go, lower panel).



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. GR{alpha} mRNA and protein expression in cultured OSE cells. Upper panel, Agarose electrophoresis gel showing the amplicon (arrow) corresponding to a 557-bp GR{alpha} PCR product in OSE cells from five separate patients (OSE 1–5) Lower panel, Representative immunohistochemical staining of GR{alpha} in a cultured OSE cell monolayer (left, GR{alpha} antiserum; right, nonimmune mouse IgG2).

 
Interaction between IL1{alpha} and cortisol on GR{alpha} mRNA expression in OSE cell cultures

Treatment of OSE cell cultures from four of four patients with IL1{alpha} caused an average 6-fold (P < 0.05) increase in GR{alpha} mRNA expression at 48 h (Fig. 5Go). Cortisol (0.01–1.0 µM) had no significant effect on basal or IL1{alpha}-stimulated levels of GR{alpha} mRNA.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Effects of IL1{alpha} and cortisol on GR{alpha} mRNA expression in OSE cells. Cultured OSE cells were treated for 48 h with 500 pg/ml IL1{alpha}, in the presence and absence of increasing concentrations of cortisol, as indicated. Taqman RT-PCR analysis was performed on total RNA to determine expression of GR{alpha}. Bars indicate average (± SEM) results from determinations on cells from four patients. Dissimilar superscripts above bars denote significantly different values (P < 0.05).

 
Antiinflammatory progesterone action in OSE cell cultures

Progesterone dose-dependently suppressed IL1{alpha}-stimulated COX-2 mRNA levels in five of five patients (Fig. 6AGo); albeit inhibition remained incomplete at the highest (1 µM) progesterone concentration tested, this was significantly reduced, compared with IL1{alpha} alone (P < 0.05). Progesterone had no measurable effect on COX-2 or 11ßHSD1 mRNA expression in the absence of IL1{alpha}, nor did it significantly affect IL1{alpha}-stimulated 11ßHSD1 mRNA expression (Fig. 6BGo).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Interaction between progesterone and IL1{alpha} on expression of COX-2 and 11ßHD1 mRNA by cultured OSE cells. Cultured OSE cells were treated for 48 h with 500 pg/ml IL1{alpha}, in the presence and absence of increasing concentrations of progesterone, as indicated. Taqman RT-PCR analysis was performed on total RNA to determine expression of COX-2 (A; n = 4 patients) and 11ßHSD1 mRNA (B; n = 5 patients). Bars represent average (± SEM) values. Dissimilar superscripts above bars denote significantly different values (P < 0.01).

 
Treatment with progesterone, alone or in combination with IL1{alpha}, had no significant effect on GR{alpha} or progesterone receptor (PR) mRNA expression; in the case of PR, there was no regulation by cortisol either alone or in combination with IL1{alpha} (data not shown).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have previously demonstrated that the inflammatory cytokine IL1{alpha} increases mRNA expression of 11ßHSD1 in cultured OSE cells, consistent with increased regeneration of cortisol from exogenous cortisone in vitro (11). We now extend these observations to demonstrate that treatment with IL1{alpha} induces expression of the inflammation-associated gene COX-2. Furthermore, we show that cortisol acts in a direct antiinflammatory manner by down-regulating cytokine- induced COX-2 and indirectly by up-regulating cytokine- induced 11ßHSD1. This suggests a feed-forward control mechanism through which cortisol is able to regenerate itself at its site of action on the inflamed ovarian surface.

A strength of these data is that they are based on replicate analyses of OSE cell function in multiple individuals. Although OSE cells were obtained at various stages of the menstrual cycle (Table 1Go), their initial propagation in serum-containing medium for a minimum of 3 wk before analysis should have nullified any contribution of the steroidal milieu existing at the time of cell collection, as previously demonstrated (11). The relative paucity of OSE cells that can be collected from a single patient imposes limits on the number of replicated analyses that can be performed on any particular set of cells. This constraint was offset by repeating all experiments on tissue from at least three patients, allowing a considerable measure of confidence in the conclusions drawn. However, it remains to be determined whether this pattern of response to IL1{alpha} truly reflects that shown in vivo.

Increased expression of COX-2 mRNA by the OSE upon exposure to IL1{alpha} is consistent with the postulated inflammatory basis of ovulation. During ovulation the OSE is exposed to multiple inflammatory mediators including cytokines (IL-1 and IL-6) that up-regulate COX-2 (19). Prostaglandin E2 formed via COX-2 initiates the acute cellular events associated with inflammation (20). The subsequent biochemical cascade leads to collagen breakdown, apoptotic cell death at the ovarian surface, and follicular rupture (21). Glucocorticoids acting via GR have been previously demonstrated to reduce inflammation through inhibition of phospholipase A2 and COX-2 (22). In ovine OSE cells, expression of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase undergoes up-regulation in OSE cells of the follicular apex just before ovulation (23), and prostaglandin synthesis in these cells is thought to be a causative agent of apoptotic death (24). Collectively, these observations are consistent with the hypothesis that ovulation is effectively a natural wound, with attendant inflammation, and that serial wounding and repair occurs at the ovarian surface as a consequence of the ovarian cycle (5, 6, 14).

We previously proposed that intracrine formation of cortisol in granulosa and OSE cells limits inflammation and associated tissue injury at the time of ovulation (11, 14). The present study provides direct evidence for an antiinflammatory action of cortisol in OSE cells through down-regulation of cytokine-induced COX-2 expression. Glucocorticoids generally exert antiinflammatory effects via the ligand-activated GR signaling pathway in inflamed tissues to antagonize the induction of the proinflammatory transcription factor nuclear factor-{kappa}B (13, 25). Based on the present ability of the GR antagonist RU486 to blockade cortisol action, it would appear that the same mode of antiinflammatory glucocorticoid action operates in OSE cells. Detection of GR{alpha} expression in the absence of GRß reinforces the premise that the OSE is a glucocorticoid target because GRß appears to be involved in inhibition of GR{alpha} (17, 18). Additionally, the finding that IL1{alpha} treatment stimulates mRNA expression of GR{alpha} suggests a novel mechanism through which inflammatory cytokines might sensitize OSE cells to glucocorticoids.

The IL1{alpha}-induced increase in expression of 11ßHSD1 by OSE cells was further augmented by cortisol, indicating a feed-forward intracrine mechanism whereby cortisol can promote its own synthesis from cortisone. Both the level and type of 11ßHSD isoform expressed, along with GR, are critical determinants of cellular responses to glucocorticoids (12). Cytokine-stimulated cells from sites of inflammation throughout the body have been shown to undertake increased 11ßHSD1 expression with concomitantly decreased 11ßHSD2 expression in vitro (11, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30). Because 11ßHSD1 reversibly converts inactive cortisone to active cortisol whereas 11ßHSD2 inactivates cortisol to cortisone, this pattern of 11ßHSD isoform expression predisposes to increased intracellular formation of cortisol from cortisone (12). From the present analyses of 11ßHSD1 and -2 mRNA expression in OSE cells, we deduced absence of induction of 11ßHSD2 but presence of l1ßHSD1 positively coupled to IL receptor signaling. This is in agreement with previous evidence that IL1{alpha} stimulates metabolism of cortisone to cortisol in OSE cultures via an IL receptor-mediated postreceptor signaling pathway (11).

OSE cells are established sites of progesterone action mediated by PR (31, 32). Consistent with its established immunosuppressive and antiinflammatory properties (13), the present results demonstrate that progesterone, like cortisol, also prevents IL1{alpha}-stimulated increases in COX-2 expression by OSE cells. Unlike cortisol, progesterone had no effect on IL1{alpha}-stimulated 11ßHSD1 expression. The mode of progesterone action on COX-2 mRNA expression was not investigated in the present study. However, because the progesterone concentration rises to around 10 µM in preovulatory follicular fluid (16), a physiologically significant antiinflammatory action of progesterone on the OSE mediated by PR seems likely.

A link between ovulation and development of ovarian cancer has been postulated for many years (33). The initial trigger for ovarian cancer formation has been suggested to arise from ovulatory damage to the ovarian surface (34, 35) associated with inflammatory assault (4). Given that prostaglandins are not only proinflammatory but are also directly implicated in tumorogenesis (4), negative regulation of inflammatory processes involving prostaglandin formation has obvious potential relevance to the prevention of ovarian cancers. It is noteworthy in this regard that loss of PR has previously been associated with neoplastic transformation in ovarian cancer cells (31).

Based on the divergent effects of 11ßHSD1 and -2 on cell proliferation observed in vitro, Rabbitt et al. (36) previously suggested that the ability of 11ßHSD1 to generate cortisol might act as an autocrine antiproliferative, prodifferentiation stimulus in normal adult tissues. In contrast, the cortisol-inactivating properties of 11ßHSD2 might lead to proproliferative effects, particularly in tumors. Our finding that normal OSE cells are essentially devoid of 11ßHSD2 mRNA lends weight to the concept that the ovulation-associated increase in 11ßHSD1 expression leading to locally increased formation of cortisol promotes healthy functioning of the OSE.

In conclusion, these data provide direct evidence for antiinflammatory actions of glucocorticoids and progesterone mediated by interaction with GR and PR, respectively, in OSE cells. Antiinflammatory actions of cortisol in OSE cells include up-regulation of cytokine-induced 11ßHSD1, indicating a means for regenerating cortisol at its site of action on the ovarian surface. The discovery of this antiinflammatory intracrine mechanism in OSE cells has implications for the diagnosis and treatment of reproductive disease states that involve chronic or excessive ovarian inflammation, including endometriosis and ovarian cancer.


    Acknowledgments
 
We gratefully acknowledge the kind gifts of quantitative RT-PCR primers and probe corresponding to COX-2 from Dr. H. Jabbour, and PR quantitative RT-PCR reagents and helpful discussion on quantitative RT-PCR primer design from Dr. E. Faccenda. We thank our clinical research nurses for their efforts in patient recruitment and sample collection. The cooperation of surgical staff at the Simpson Maternity Wards is also gratefully acknowledged.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by MRC Programme Grant 0000066 (to S.G.H. and H.O.D.C.).

Abbreviations: COX, Cyclooxygenase; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; 11ßHSD1, 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1; OSE, ovarian surface epithelium; PR, progesterone receptor; RT, reverse transcription.

Received December 30, 2003.

Accepted April 30, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Auersperg N, Wong AST, Choi KC, Kang SK, Leung PCK 2001 Ovarian surface epithelium: biology, endocrinology, and pathology. Endocr Rev 22:255–288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Murdoch WJ 1999 Plasmin-tumour necrosis factor interaction in the ovulatory process. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 54:353–358[Medline]
  3. Colgin DC, Murdoch WJ 1997 Evidence for a role of the ovarian surface epithelium in the ovulatory mechanism of the sheep: secretion of urokinase-type plasminogen activator. Anim Reprod Sci 47:197–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Ness RB, Cottreau C 1999 Possible role of ovarian epithelial inflammation in ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1459–1467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Espey LL 1980 Ovulation as an inflammatory reaction—a hypothesis. Biol Reprod 22:73–106[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Espey LL 1994 Current status of the hypothesis that mammalian ovulation is comparable to an inflammatory reaction. Biol Reprod 50:233–238[Abstract]
  7. Ness RB, Grisso JA, Cottreau C, Klapper J, Vergona R, Wheeler JE, Morgan M, Schlesselman JJ 2000 Factors related to inflammation of the ovarian epithelium and risk of ovarian cancer. Epidemiology 11:111–117[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Murdoch WJ 1998 Perturbation of sheep ovarian surface epithelial cells by ovulation: evidence for roles of progesterone and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in the restoration of DNA integrity. J Endocrinol 156:503–508[Abstract]
  9. Terranova PF, Rice VM 1997 Review: cytokine involvement in ovarian processes. Am J Reprod Immunol 37:50–63
  10. Adashi EY 1998 The potential role of interleukin-1 in the ovulatory process: an evolving hypothesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 140:77–81[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Yong PY, Harlow C, Thong KJ, Hillier SG 2002 Regulation of 11ßhydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 gene expression in human ovarian surface epithelial cells by interleukin-1. Hum Reprod 17:2300–2306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Rae MT, Niven D, Ross A, Foster T, Lathe R, Critchley HOD, Ghozal P, Hillier SG, Steroid signalling in human ovarian surface epithelial cells: the response to interleukin-1{alpha} determined by microarray analysis. J Endocrinol, in press
  13. Quinkler M, Stewart PM 2003 Hypertension and the cortisol-cortisone shuttle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:2384–2392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. van der Burg B, van der Saag PT 1997 Nuclear factor-{kappa}-B/steroid hormone receptor interactions as a functional basis of anti-inflammatory action of steroids in reproductive organs. Mol Hum Reprod 2:433–438
  15. Hillier SG, Tetsuka M 1998 An anti-inflammatory role for glucocorticoids in the ovaries? J Reprod Immunol 39:21–27[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Hillier SG, Anderson RA, Williams AR, Tetsuka M 1998 Expression of oestrogen receptor {alpha} and ß in cultured human ovarian surface epithelial cells. Mol Hum Reprod 4:811–815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Andersen CY 2002 Possible new mechanism of cortisol action in female reproductive organs: physiological implications of the free hormone hypothesis. J Endocrinol 73:211–217
  18. Dahia PL, Honegger J, Reincke M, Jacobs RA, Mirtella A, Fahlbusch R, Besser GM, Chew SL, Grossman AB 1997 Expression of glucocorticoid receptor gene isoforms in corticotropin-secreting tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1088–1093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Oakley RH, Sar M, Cidlowski JA 1996 The human glucocorticoid receptor ß isoform. Expression, biochemical properties, and putative function. J Biol Chem 271:9550–9559[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Hellberg P, Larson L, Olofsson J, Brannstrom M, Hedin L 1996 Regulation of the inducible form of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase in the perfused rat. Mol Hum Reprod 2:111–116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Smith WL, Langenbach R 2001 Why are there two cyclooxygenase isozymes? J Clin Invest 107:1491–1495[Medline]
  22. Murdoch WJ, Wilken C, Young DA 1999 Sequence of apoptosis and inflammatory necrosis within the formative ovulatory site of sheep follicles. J Reprod Fertil 117:325–329
  23. Goppelt-Struebe M 1997 Molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of prostaglandin biosynthesis by glucocorticoids. Biochem Pharmacol 15:1389–1395
  24. Murdoch WJ, Slaughter RG, Ji TH 1991 In situ hybridisation analysis of ovarian prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase throughout the periovulatory period. Domest Anim Endocrinol 83:455–457
  25. Ackerman RC, Murdoch WJ 1993 Prostaglandin-induced apoptosis of ovarian surface epithelial cells. Prostaglandins 45:475–485[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. McKay LI, Cidlowski JA 1999 Molecular control of immune/inflammatory responses: interactions between nuclear factor-{kappa}B and steroid receptorsignaling pathways. Endocr Rev 20:435–459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Escher G, Galli I, Vishwanath BS, Frey BM, Frey FJ 1997 Tumor necrosis factor {alpha} and interleukin 1ß enhance the cortisone/cortisol shuttle. J Exp Med 186:189–198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Feinstein MB, Schleimer RP 1999 Regulation of the action of hydrocortisone in airway epithelial cells by11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 21:403–408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Cai TQ, Wong B, Mundt SS, Thieringert R, Wright SD, Hermanowski-Vosatka A 2001 Induction of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 but not -2 in human aortic smooth muscle cells by inflammatory stimuli. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 77:117–122[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Tetsuka M, Haines LC, Milne M, Simpson GE, Hillier SG 1999 Regulation of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 gene expression by LH and interleukin-1ß in cultured rat granulosa cells. J Endocrinol 163:417–423[Abstract]
  31. Cooper MS, Bujalska I, Rabbitt E, Walker EA, Bland R, Sheppard MC, Hewison M, Stewart PM 2001 Modulation of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isozymes by proinflammatory cytokines in osteoblasts: an autocrine switch from glucocorticoid inactivation to activation. J Bone Miner Res 16:1037–1044[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Lau KM, Mok SC, Ho SM 1999 Expression of human estrogen receptor-{alpha} and -ß, progesterone receptor, and androgen receptor mRNA in normal and malignant ovarian epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5722–5727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Karlan BY, Jones J, Greenwald M, Lagasse LD 1995 Steroid hormone effects on the proliferation of human ovarian surface epithelium in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:97–104[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Fathalla MF 1971 Incessant ovulation—a factor in ovarian neoplasia? Lancet 2:163[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Murdoch WJ 1996 Ovarian surface epithelium, ovulation and carcinogenesis. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 71:529–543[Medline]
  36. Murdoch WJ, Townsend RS, McDonnel AC 2001 Ovulation-induced DNA damage in ovarian surface epithelial cells of ewes: prospective regulatory mechanisms of repair/survival and apoptosis. Biol Reprod 65:1417–1424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Rabbitt EH, Gittoes NJ, Stewart PM, Hewison M 2003 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases, cell proliferation and malignancy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 85:415–421[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
D. A. Symonds, I. Merchenthaler, and J. A. Flaws
Methoxychlor and Estradiol Induce Oxidative Stress DNA Damage in the Mouse Ovarian Surface Epithelium
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2008; 105(1): 182 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S. van den Driesche, V. M Smith, M. Myers, and W C. Duncan
Expression and regulation of oestrogen receptors in the human corpus luteum
Reproduction, April 1, 2008; 135(4): 509 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
K S Fegan, M T Rae, H O D Critchley, and S G Hillier
Anti-inflammatory steroid signalling in the human peritoneum
J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 196(2): 369 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Myers, M. C. Lamont, S. van den Driesche, N. Mary, K. J. Thong, S. G. Hillier, and W. C. Duncan
Role of Luteal Glucocorticoid Metabolism during Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy in Women
Endocrinology, December 1, 2007; 148(12): 5769 - 5779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
S. G Hillier
Diamonds are forever: the cortisone legacy
J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 195(1): 1 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R. G Lea and O. Sandra
Immunoendocrine aspects of endometrial function and implantation
Reproduction, September 1, 2007; 134(3): 389 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. T. Rae, O. Gubbay, A. Kostogiannou, D. Price, H. O. D. Critchley, and S. G. Hillier
Thyroid Hormone Signaling in Human Ovarian Surface Epithelial Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 322 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. C. Jonas, C. Chandras, D. R. E. Abayasekara, and A. E. Michael
Role for Prostaglandins in the Regulation of Type 1 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase in Human Granulosa-Lutein Cells
Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5865 - 5872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
W. C. Duncan, S. G. Hillier, E. Gay, J. Bell, and H. M. Fraser
Connective Tissue Growth Factor Expression in the Human Corpus Luteum: Paracrine Regulation by Human Chorionic Gonadotropin
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5366 - 5376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rae, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rae, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, S. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals