help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Canto, P.
Right arrow Articles by Méndez, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Canto, P.
Right arrow Articles by Méndez, J. P.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 89, No. 9 4480-4483
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

Mutations in the Desert hedgehog (DHH) Gene in Patients with 46,XY Complete Pure Gonadal Dysgenesis

P. Canto, D. Söderlund, E. Reyes and J. P. Méndez

Research Unit in Developmental Biology (P.C., D.S., J.P.M.), Hospital de Pediatría, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México, Distrito Federal 06725, México; and Department of Pathology (E.R.), Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición "Salvador Zubirán", México, Distrito Federal 14000, México

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Juan Pablo Méndez, M.D., Unidad de Investigación Médica en Biología del Desarrollo, Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Coahuila 5, Apartado Postal A-047, Colonia Roma, C.P. 06703, México, D.F., México. E-mail: jpmb{at}servidor.unam.mx.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mutations of SRY are the cause of complete pure gonadal dysgenesis (PGD) in 10–15% of patients. In the remaining individuals, it has been suggested that mutations in other genes involved in the testis-determining pathway could be causative. We describe the first report in which three cases of 46,XY complete PGD are attributed to mutations of the Desert hedgehog (DHH) gene.

DHH was sequenced using genomic DNA from paraffinembedded gonadal tissue from six patients with complete 46,XY PGD. Mutations were found in three patients: a homozygous mutation in exon 2, responsible for a L162P, and a homozygous 1086delG in exon 3.

Mutated individuals displayed 46,XY complete PGD, differentiating from the only previously described patient with a homozygous DHH mutation, who exhibited a partial form of PGD with polyneuropathy, suggesting that localization of mutations influence phenotypic expression.

This constitutes the first report where mutations of DHH are associated with the presence of 46,XY complete PGD, demonstrating that the genetic origin of this entity is heterogeneous and that disorders in other genes, different from SRY, involved in the testis-determining pathway are implicated in abnormal testicular differentiation in humans. These data extend previous reports demonstrating DHH is a key gene in gonadal differentiation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MALE SEX DETERMINATION in mammals depends on the presence of the SRY gene located on the Y chromosome, as well as on the action of several other genes, which are involved in the testis-determining pathway, located on autosomal and X-linked loci. A vital event in testicular organogenesis is the specification of somatic cell lineages, which include Leydig cells, Sertoli cells, and peritubular myoid cells. Specification of these lineages is critical for establishing testis morphology and hormone production (1).

Gonadal dysgenesis encompasses a heterogeneous group of different chromosomal, gonadal and phenotypic abnormalities (2, 3). Sex reversal in XY females is a consequence of failure of testis determination or differentiation. Individuals with the complete form of 46,XY pure gonadal dysgenesis (PGD) present a 46,XY karyotype, bilateral streak gonads, normally developed Müllerian ducts, and female external genitalia (2). It has been estimated that the presence of the Y chromosome in 46,XY PGD patients increases (10–30%) the risk of developing gonadal tumors, i.e. gonadoblastoma or dysgerminoma (4, 5).

Mutations of the SRY gene are the cause of 46,XY sex reversal in approximately 10–15% of patients with PGD. In the remaining individuals, a precise cause has not been determined, and it has been suggested that they may bear mutations in the SRY regulatory elements or in other genes involved in the testis-determining pathway (6, 7). One of these genes is Desert hedgehog (DHH), a member of the hedgehog family of signaling proteins, which also includes Sonic hedgehog and Indian hedgehog (8). In humans, DHH is located in 12q12->q13.1, is composed of three exons, and encodes a protein of 396 amino acids (9).

In mice, Dhh has a sexually dimorphic expression. Analysis of gene transcripts demonstrated that expression of Dhh is observed in fetal testes at 11.5 d postcoitum, whereas no transcripts are detected in fetal ovaries (10). The product of the Dhh gene is specifically expressed in Sertoli cells and Schwann cells along peripheral nerves (11, 12). The importance Dhh has in testicular morphology was originally described by Clark et al. (13) in a study in which the majority of Dhh null male mice developed into pseudohermaphrodites. Likewise, it was demonstrated that the differentiation of peritubular myoid cells and the consequent formation of testis cords is regulated by Dhh (13, 14). Furthermore, Hung-Chang et al. (1) suggested that Dhh/Ptch1 signaling is a positive regulator of the differentiation of steroid-producing Leydig cells in the fetal testis. Dhh is expressed in Sertoli cells, being the only mammalian hedgehog protein expressed in the gonad between 11.5 and 13.5 d postcoitum. Ptch1, one of the hedgehog receptors, is expressed in interstitial cells. In conclusion, Dhh/Ptch1 signaling triggers Leydig cell differentiation by up-regulating Steroidogenic Factor 1 and P450 Side Chain Cleavage enzyme expression in Ptch1-expressing precursor cells, which are located outside the testis cords.

In 2000, Umehara et al. (15) reported a homozygous missense mutation of the DHH gene in one patient with 46,XY partial gonadal dysgenesis associated with minifascicular neuropathy. The authors suggested that DHH is a key molecule that intervenes in both male gonadal differentiation and perineural formation in peripheral nerves.

Here we describe the first report in which in three cases of 46,XY complete PGD, homozygous mutations of the DHH gene are associated with the disorder.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

The study was approved by the Institute’s Human Research Committee. Gonadal tissue obtained from gonadectomies between 1983 and 1998, from six unrelated phenotypic females with 46,XY complete PGD, was molecularly studied. All patients had a Mexican-mestizo ethnic origin, and in all cases family history was negative for consanguinity. All individuals had a nonmosaic 46,XY karyotype in at least 50 cells (peripheral blood leukocytes). Clinical and histopathological findings in these patients are shown in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Clinical and histopathological findings in six patients with 46,XY complete PGD

 
Methods

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes in control subjects by standard techniques (16) and from paraffin-embedded gonadal tissue from the patients and three controls using the MagneSil genomic fixed tissue system (Promega Corp., Madison, WI), following the conditions recommended by the manufacturer. DNA was amplified by PCR in 50 µl of reaction mixture containing 0.3 µg genomic DNA, 0.1 mM dNTPs, 2.0 U of thermostable DNA polymerase (AmpliTaq, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and 250 nM of each specific set of DHH primers. The sequences of the DHH primers for all three exons and the PCR conditions were described by Umehara et al. (15) (GenBank accession number AB010581 for exon 1, AB010993 for exon 2, and AB010994 for exon 3).

After amplification, PCR products were electrophoresed in a 1.2% agarose gel and afterward purified using the QIAEX II gel extraction kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). These products were then sequenced (0.1 µg DNA template reaction) on an ABI 377 automated DNA sequencer (Perkin-Elmer, Applied Biosystems Division, Foster City, CA) using the BigDye terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (Perkin-Elmer). For all exons, both strands were sequenced and compared. Each mutation was confirmed in three independent PCR amplifications and sequencings.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In all patients, the sequence of the open reading frame of the SRY gene was analyzed in gonadal tissue and no mutations were found (data not shown).

Genetic defects in the DHH gene were found in three of six patients. In patient 4, a homozygous mutation in exon 2 consisting of a T-to-C substitution at position 485 was observed. This mutation was responsible for a leucine (CTG) into proline (CCG) substitution at codon 162 (Fig. 1Go). Exons 1 and 3 showed no sequence variations. In patients 2 and 6, a nucleotide deletion was found in exon 3, at position 1086, which comprises the third nucleotide (guanine) of codon 362. This deletion caused a stop codon (TAG), four codons after the deletion was located (Fig. 2Go). No sequence variations were observed in the first two exons of the gene.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Partial sequence of exon 2 of the DHH gene from patient 4 and from a normal male control. A homozygous thymine-to-cytosine (T->C) mutation that results in the substitution of leucine into proline at codon 162 is observed in the patient.

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Partial sequence of exon 3 of the DHH gene from patient 6 and from a normal male control. A nucleotide deletion (guanine) at position 1086 is observed. The deletion causes a frameshift and a premature termination codon (PTC), four codons after the deletion was located.

 
Direct sequencing of exons 1–3 of the DHH gene in the remaining three patients did not reveal any molecular abnormality.

One hundred normal male individuals (200 alleles) did not harbor any of the mutations, being homozygous wild type.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Gonadal dysgenesis comprises a variety of clinical conditions characterized by abnormal development of the fetal gonad, including 45,X Ullrich Turner syndrome and its variants, mixed gonadal dysgenesis, as well as 46,XX and 46,XY PGD. The latter includes a complete and a partial form; in 46,XY complete PGD, bilateral streak gonads are always formed (2). In the majority of cases, the precise origin of this entity has not been determined; the SRY gene is mutated in only 10–15% of patients with 46,XY PGD. In the remaining individuals, the cause of the disorder has not been established (6, 7), although some autosomal and X-linked loci have been linked with failure to develop a testis (17).

In mammals, testis development is initiated in response to the expression of Sry in Sertoli cell precursors. In Sertoli cells, the activation of Dhh transcription occurs immediately after the initiation of Sry expression (11). Bitgood et al. (10) generated knockout mice genetically null for the Dhh gene, observing male sterility. Likewise, Clark et al. (13) studied the testes from adult and prepubertal mice lacking Dhh, demonstrating peritubular cell defects that may be indicative of the role these cells have in the development of tubular morphology, Leydig cell differentiation, and spermatogenesis. Umehara et al. (15) analyzed the DHH gene in peripheral blood from one subject with 46,XY partial PGD and polyneuropathy who presented premature female genitalia, a blinded vagina and immature uterus, as well as a testis in one side and a streak gonad on the other. These authors found a missense mutation at the initiation codon of exon 1, which abolished initiation of translation at the normal start site, suggesting that failure of translation of the DHH gene may disturb the differentiation of male gonads and may result in 46,XY partial PGD.

In the present study, we analyzed all three exons of the DHH gene in six patients with 46,XY complete PGD, finding homozygous mutations in three of them. Mutated individuals displayed a 46,XY complete PGD (female external genitalia, bilateral fallopian tubes with infantile uterus, and streak gonads). To date, the only DHH mutation described in 46,XY PGD is the one by Umehara et al. (15); comparing this mutation with our cases, we can affirm that the phenotypic spectrum of 46,XY PGD patients with mutations in the DHH gene is variable, ranging from a partial form of PGD with polyneuropathy (15) to complete PGD without polyneuropathy. All of our patients had normal motor functions of both extremities and superficial and deep sensations; reflexes were also normal, there was no presence of symptoms or signs that suggested polyneuropathy, and mental function was not impaired. The phenotypic differences observed between our patients and the one reported by Umehara et al. (15) suggest that the localization of the mutations as well as a variety of other factors influence the expression of the phenotype. The presence of DHH mutations in patients with 46,XY partial PGD, as well as in 46,XY complete PGD, is similar to what has been observed regarding the SRY gene, where mutations have been shown to induce 46,XY complete PGD or partial PGD (18).

The L162P mutation exhibited by patient 4 is located in the mature amino-terminal domain of the DHH protein, constituting the first spontaneous mutation described in this domain. This mutation led to a nonconservative amino acid substitution, changing a highly conserved residue (Table 2AGo). We assume that the L162P mutation affected DHH function considering that the mature amino-terminal domain of Hh proteins has been shown to be essential for all the known long- and short-range activities of this protein (19, 20), and perhaps this mutation could alter the ability to bind with the transmembrane protein Ptc, which is required for cellular responsiveness to DHH (21).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Alignment of the human DHH sequences with other mammalian Dhh and D. melanogaster Hh, demonstrating the highly conserved leucine 162 (substituted in patient 4 by a proline) and leucine 362 (nucleotide 1086delG in patients 2 and 6)

 
The second mutation was found in patients 2 and 6, who presented a nucleotide 1086delG in exon 3. This mutation led to a nonconservative amino acid substitution, changing a highly conserved residue (Table 2BGo). Taking into consideration that two of six patients exhibited this mutation and although there is no known relationship between them, the mutation could derive from a common ancestor by a founder gene effect. An alternative explanation is that the identical deletion observed might indicate the presence of a hot spot in this region of the DHH gene. This deletion is located in the carboxyl-terminal domain of the DHH protein. Lee et al. (19) examined the effects of several distinct types of mutations in the carboxyl-terminal domain of Drosophila melanogaster, demonstrating that deletion or alteration of residues within this domain is associated with absence or reduced efficiency of autoproteolysis of the hedgehog. Furthermore, Porter et al. (22) observed that the autoprocessing activity of the carboxy-terminal domain influences the cellular localization of the amino-terminal domain.

As it has been proposed for the SRY gene (18), we assume that a given mutation in DHH may produce sufficient DHH activity to reach the threshold required for testis formation. However, the same mutation on a different genetic background may reduce DHH activity, preventing testis development. Bitgood et al. (10) observed that the severity of the phenotype presented in their colony of Dhh-null mice varied depending upon the genetic background. Those on an inbred background of the 129/Sv strain developed germ cells up to primary spermatocytes, whereas germ cells in some of the 129/Sv-C57BL/6JF1 hybrids developed through meiosis to become step-15 spermatids. Furthermore, Clark et al. (13) reported that in their colony of Dhh-null mice bred on a mixed genetic background, the phenotypic outcome of the Dhh-null condition was more severe than the ones previously described.

We identified mutations of the DHH gene in only three of the six patients studied. The true prevalence of such mutations is difficult to assess because of the rarity of this entity. Larger samples of patients will need to be studied to determine the true prevalence of DHH mutations in humans. The absence of mutations in the other patients studied indicates that molecular defects in such patients could be present in the untranslated regulatory regions of the DHH gene or within introns; besides, defects in other gene(s) could explain the disorder.

In conclusion, to our knowledge, this constitutes the first report where mutations of the DHH gene are associated with the presence of 46,XY complete PGD. These data demonstrate that the genetic origin of 46,XY complete PGD is heterogeneous and that disorders in other genes, different from SRY, that are involved in the testis-determining pathway are directly implicated in abnormal testicular differentiation in humans. Likewise, these data extend previous reports in humans and other species demonstrating that DHH constitutes a key gene in gonadal differentiation.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Leonor Enciso from the Unidad de Instrumentos, Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, and Irak León-O’Farrill from Unidad de Investigación Médica en Biología del Desarrollo, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, for their technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), México (Grant G29790M).

Abbreviation: PGD, Pure gonadal dysgenesis.

Received May 11, 2004.

Accepted June 16, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Hung-Chang Yao H, Whoriskey W, Capel B 2002 Desert hedgehog/Patched 1 signaling specifies fetal Leydig cell fate in testis organogenesis. Genes Dev 16:1433–1440[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Berkovitz GD, Fechner PY, Zacur HW, Rock JA, Snyder HM, Migeon CJ, Perlman EJ 1991 Clinical and pathologic spectrum of 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis: its relevance to the understanding of sex differentiation. Medicine 70:375–383[Medline]
  3. Méndez JP, Ulloa-Aguirre A, Kofman-Alfaro S, Mutchinick O, Fernández del Castillo C, Reyes E, Pérez-Palacios G 1993 Mixed gonadal dysgenesis: clinical, cytogenetic, endocrinological, and histopathological findings in 16 patients. Am J Med Genet 46:263–267[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Scully RE 1970 Gonadoblastoma: a review of 74 cases. Cancer 25:1340–1356[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Verp MS, Simpson JL 1987 Abnormal sexual differentiation and neoplasia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 25:191–218[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Schäffler A, Barth N, Winkler K, Zietz B, Rümmele P, Knüchel R, Schölmerich J, Palitzsch K-D 2000 Identification of a new missense mutation (Gly95Glu) in a highly conserved codon within the high-mobility group box of the sex-determining region Y gene: report on a 46,XY female with gonadal dysgenesis and yolk-sac tumor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2287–2292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Assumpcao JG, Benedetti CE, Maciel-Guerra AT, Guerra Jr G, Baptista MT, Scolfaro MR, de Mello MP 2002 Novel mutations affecting SRY DNA-binding activity: the HMG box N65H associated with 46,XY pure gonadal dysgenesis and the familial non-HMG box R30I associated with variable phenotypes. J Mol Med 80:782–790[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ingham PW 1998 Transducing hedgehog: the history so far. EMBO J 17:3505–3511[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Tate G, Satoh H, Endo Y, Mitsuya T 2000 Assignment of desert hedgehog (DHH) to human chromosome bands 12q12 -> q13.1 by in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 88:93–94[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Bitgood MJ, Shen L, McMahon AP 1996 Sertoli cell signaling by Desert hedgehog regulates the male germline. Curr Biol 6:298–304[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Bitgood MJ, McMahon AP 1995 Hedgehog and Bmp genes are coexpressed at many diverse sites of cell-cell interaction in the mouse embryo. Dev Biol 172:126–138[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Parmantier E, Lynn B, Lawson D, Turmaine M, Sharghi Namini S, Chakrabarti L, McMahon AP, Jessen KR, Mirsky R 1999 Schwann cell-derived Desert hedgehog controls the development of peripheral nerve sheaths. Neuron 23:713–724[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Clark AM, Garland KK, Russell LD 2000 Desert hedgehog (Dhh) gene is required in the mouse testis for formation of adult-type Leydig cells and normal development of peritubular cells and seminiferous tubules. Biol Reprod 63:1825–1838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Pierucci-Alves F, Clark AM, Russell LD 2001 A developmental study of the Desert hedgehog-null mouse testis. Biol Reprod 65:1392–1402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Umehara F, Tate G, Itoh K, Yamaguchi N, Douchi T, Mitsuya T, Osame M 2000 A novel mutation of desert hedgehog in a patient with 46,XY partial gonadal dysgenesis accompanied by minifascicular neuropathy. Am J Hum Genet 67:1302–1305[Medline]
  16. Sambrook J, Russell D 2001 Preparation and analysis of eukaryotic genomic DNA. In: Nolan C, ed. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 6.1–6.31
  17. Veitia RA, Salas-Cortes L, Ottolenghi Ch, Pailhoux E, Cotinot C, Fellous M 2001 Testis determination in mammals: more questions than answers. Mol Cell Endocrinol 179:3–16[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Cameron FJ, Sinclair AH 1997 Mutations in SRY and SOX9: testis-determining genes. Hum Mutat 9:388–395[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Lee JJ, Ekker SC, von Kessler DP, Porter JA, Sun BI, Beachy PA 1994 Autoproteolysis in hedgehog protein biogenesis. Science 266:1528–1537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Bumcrot DA, Takada R, McMahon AP 1995 Proteolytic processing yields two secreted forms of Sonic hedgehog. Mol Cell Biol 15:2294–2303[Abstract]
  21. Pathi S, Pagan-Westphal S, Baker DP, Garber EA, Rayhorn P, Bumcrot D, Tabin CJ, Blake Pepinsky RB, Williams KP 2001 Comparative biological responses to human Sonic, Indian and Desert hedgehog. Mech Dev 106:107–117[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Porter JA, von Kessler DP, Ekker SC, Young KE, Lee JJ, Moses K, Beachy PA 1995 The product of hedgehog autoproteolytic cleavage active in local and long-range signalling. Nature 374:363–366[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
P. J King, L. Guasti, and E. Laufer
Hedgehog signalling in endocrine development and disease
J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2008; 198(3): 439 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Y. Park, M. Tong, and J. L. Jameson
Distinct Roles for Steroidogenic factor 1 and Desert hedgehog Pathways in Fetal and Adult Leydig Cell Development
Endocrinology, August 1, 2007; 148(8): 3704 - 3710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
D. Wilhelm, S. Palmer, and P. Koopman
Sex Determination and Gonadal Development in Mammals
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 1 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
P. Canto, F. Vilchis, D. Soderlund, E. Reyes, and J.P. Mendez
A heterozygous mutation in the desert hedgehog gene in patients with mixed gonadal dysgenesis
Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 11(11): 833 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Canto, P.
Right arrow Articles by Méndez, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Canto, P.
Right arrow Articles by Méndez, J. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals