help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gilsanz, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gilsanz, V.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 89, No. 9 4246-4253
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society


Special Feature

Aortic Calcification and the Risk of Osteoporosis and Fractures

Eloy Schulz, Kiumars Arfai, Xiaodong Liu, James Sayre and Vicente Gilsanz

Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center (E.S.), Loma Linda, California 92354; the Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California (K.A., X.L., V.G.), Los Angeles, California 90027; and the Department of Biostatistics, University of California Los Angeles (J.S.), Los Angeles, California 90024

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Vicente Gilsanz, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Radiology, MS 81, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90027. E-mail: vgilsanz{at}chla.usc.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We investigated the relation between computed tomography measures of aortic calcification and values for bone density and the number of fragility fractures in 2348 healthy, postmenopausal women. To determine whether increases in vascular calcification and bone loss progress in parallel, baseline values were compared with measurements obtained 9 months to 8 yr later in a subgroup of 228 women.

Of the 2348 subjects studied, 70% had osteoporosis, 30% had at least one vertebral fracture, and 9% had at least one hip fracture. Aortic calcifications were inversely related to bone density and directly related to fractures. After adjusting for age and potential confounders, measures for aortic calcification predicted 26.1% of the variance in bone density (P < 0.001). Compared with women without calcification, the odds ratios for vertebral and hip fractures in those with calcification were estimated to be 4.8 (95% confidence interval, 3.6–6.5) and 2.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.8–4.8), respectively. The subgroup analysis of 228 women longitudinally studied showed that the percentage of yearly increase in aortic calcification accounted for 47% of the variance in the percentage rate of bone loss (P < 0.001). Moreover, a strong graded association was observed between the progression of vascular calcification and bone loss for each quartile. Women in the highest quartile for gains in aortic calcification had four times greater yearly bone loss (5.3 vs.1.3% yearly; P < 0.001) than women of similar age in the lowest quartile. Smaller, but highly significant differences were also found between all other quartiles.

We conclude that aortic calcifications are a strong predictor for low bone density and fragility fractures.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND OSTEOPOROSIS are polygenic, degenerative diseases common in the elderly population, and their prevalence is increasing. Because they are common, both diseases are frequently observed in the same individual. Although multiple reports have suggested a link between atherosclerosis and osteoporosis, making an unequivocal connection between these two age-dependent conditions has been difficult. Some studies have reported the relation to be dependent on age (1, 2, 3), others have suggested it to be independent of age (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9), and still others did not examine the possible confounding effect of age (10, 11, 12, 13) or found no relation at all (14, 15). These studies generally used conventional radiography or a combination of radiographs and absorptiometry techniques for determinations of arterial calcification and bone density (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Conventional radiography, however, is rather insensitive for the identification of small vascular calcifications; previous studies simply ranked vascular calcification as present or absent (16, 17). Similarly, bone determinations using photon or x-ray absorptiometry are limited to a two-dimensional assessment and are inaccurate in the presence of extraosseous calcium in the beam path of the region of interest (18, 19, 20).

In contrast to projection techniques, computed tomography (CT) can independently quantify the mineral in arterial and skeletal tissues with precision and accuracy (21, 22, 23). In the current study, we used CT to examine the possible relations between calcified plaques in the aorta, a risk factor for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (24), and the two morphological traits that characterize osteoporosis: low bone density and fragility fractures (17). To this end, we systematically reviewed the medical records and analyzed the CT digital data of a large number of women who underwent bone density examinations. Our aim was to test the hypotheses that there is a significant age-independent relation between atherosclerosis and osteoporosis and that increases in vascular calcification and bone loss progress in parallel.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The protocol for this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Loma Linda University Medical Center (Loma Linda, CA) where all patients were studied and from which pertinent clinical data were obtained, and by the Institutional Review Board of the Childrens Hospital Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA), where all digital data were analyzed.

Study population

From 1984–1998, 4261 patients had one or more CT bone density determinations at the Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, (Fig. 1Go). From a review of the medical records, which included information about dietary intake and physical activity, we identified postmenopausal women 50 yr of age and older of European descent who were ambulatory, did not smoke, and did not drink more than one alcoholic beverage per month. Excluded from this study were women with bone disorders other than primary osteoporosis, with any rheumatological or endocrine conditions requiring medical treatment, or with any history of cancer in the past 5 yr. Also excluded were subjects who received therapeutic doses of sex steroids, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, corticosteroids, thiazide, and fluoride. Using these criteria, we selected 2348 women whose CT studies were analyzed to assess the possible associations between bone mineralization and aortic calcification.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Study flow chart depicting the number of subjects in the longitudinal and cross-sectional studies.

 
Measures of calcium intake were ascertained with an abbreviated, semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (25). A quantitative questionnaire resembling the National Health Interview Survey was also used to evaluate the physical activity of the subjects, and the results were expressed as a score ranging from 1 to 3 (26). A score of 3 was assigned to subjects who exercised regularly (high physical activity); 2 was assigned to subjects who did not exercise regularly but participated in daily activities, such as housework, gardening, climbing or descending stairs, or walking to work or to the bus stop (moderate physical activity); and 1 was assigned to subjects who did not participate in any of the aforementioned activities on a daily basis (low physical activity).

Further review of the records revealed that 1049 study subjects returned for additional CT bone density determinations 9 months to 8.2 yr later. Data from this subset indicated that 821 were on therapy or suffered from a condition that could alter bone metabolism and that 228 women continued to be ambulatory, healthy, and medication-free (Fig. 2Go). Thereafter, the follow-up CT studies of these 228 women were examined to determine whether changes in bone density and changes in aortic calcification progress in parallel.



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Magnified CT image depicting two calcified plaques in the aorta adjacent to the third lumbar vertebral body of a 57-yr-old woman. Specially designed software indicates that 114.1° of the aortic wall is calcified.

 
CT determinations

All studies were obtained with either a CT-T 9800 scanner (General Electric Co., Milwaukee, WI) or a Somatom Plus scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), and reference phantoms for calibration were scanned simultaneously with the patient. Scout radiographs were used for location of the scanning sites.

Aortic calcification determinations. Using specially designed software, the extent of calcification in the aortic wall was quantified at the lowest thoracic vertebra (T12) and the first four lumbar vertebrae (L1–L4) from the same CT axial scans used to obtain bone measurements. To this end, the aorta was magnified x10, its boundaries were identified at four equidistant sites, and the number of pixels in the circle or oval was defined by the four quadratic points calculated. All pixels in the perimeter of the aorta were measured based on a fixed percentage difference between the material density of the wall and the measured density of fat immediately adjacent to the wall. Thereafter, the ratio of pixels with and without calcification was determined visually, and the results were expressed as degrees of calcified wall, from 0–360 (Fig. 2Go). The coefficient of variation (CV) for repeated measurements of aortic wall calcification was estimated to be 1.1%. The reliability of CT in predicting atherosclerotic lesions has been validated by histopathology studies of the coronary arteries (22).

Bone density determinations. Measurements of cancellous bone density were acquired from the cross-sectional images at the levels of T12-L4. Cancellous bone density of the vertebral bodies was measured in unfractured vertebrae, as previously described (27). For the purposes of this study, the density of cancellous bone was defined as the mean value of the CT unit of measurement (milligrams per centimeters3) at the midportion of the vertebral bodies. The CV for measurements of cancellous bone density in the vertebral bodies has previously been calculated to be 3% (27). Current criteria define osteoporosis as a condition wherein the value for bone mineral density is more than 2.5 SD below the young adult mean value, which corresponds to CT measurements for cancellous bone density less than 110 mg/cm3 (28).

Fracture determinations. Vertebral and hip fractures were identified from the lateral and the anteroposterior CT scout radiographs, respectively. From the lateral CT spine radiograph, measurements of vertebral height were calculated at the anterior, middle, and posterior portions of the vertebral body. For the purposes of this study, wedge fractures were defined by a reduction of at least 20% in vertebral anterior height compared with posterior height; central collapse fractures by a loss of at least 20% height in the midportion of the vertebral body compared with either the anterior or posterior height; and crush fractures by a reduction in both the anterior and posterior height when compared with the closest adjacent intact superior vertebrae. The CVs for measurements of vertebral body height have previously been calculated to be 1.6% (27).

Women with hip fractures were identified from the CT anteroposterior scout radiographs, which depicted the multiple screws, the sliding hip screw, or the prostheses required for its treatment, and the diagnosis was confirmed through medical records. The number of fractures at sites other than the vertebrae and the proximal femurs was determined solely by reviewing the medical records.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS for Windows (version 10, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and BMDP (version 7.0, BMDP Statistical Software, Cork, Ireland) statistical programs. The data were analyzed by the Student’s t test for paired and unpaired samples, simple and multiple regression analyses, and Hotelling’s T2 (29). All results are expressed as mean ± SD. An {alpha} level of 0.05 was accepted for significance of all statistical procedures. Values for aortic calcification represent the mean value of all five sites from T12-L4, whereas values for vertebral cancellous bone density represent only the mean value for unfractured vertebrae from T12-L4.

To examine differences in bone density between subjects with and without aortic calcification, regression models were fit for aortic calcification as the dependent variable and bone density as the independent variable using the General Linear Models procedure (30). The effects of adjustment for age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), years post menopause, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, self-reported calcium intake, and physical activity index were also explored by including these as independent variables in the model. Differences among quartiles were assessed by ANOVA (31).

Differences in the percentage of vertebral and hip fractures among participants with and without aortic calcification were assessed using two-group regression analysis. To obtain better control of the effect of age on fracture prevalence, women were classified according to 5-yr age groupings (50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, 80–84, 85–89, and 90–94) when studying vertebral fractures and 10-yr age groupings (50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, and 90–99) when studying fractures of the proximal femur. The number of fractures in subjects with and without aortic calcification was compared using Student’s t tests for unpaired samples and the Hotelling’s T2 (30).

For the longitudinal analysis, we used a linear regression model to compare rates of progression in aortic calcification and bone loss (as percentage yearly change). Changes in aortic calcification were used as the dependent variable, and percentage of bone loss was used as the independent variable. To account for potential confounders and other covariates, baseline values for age, anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, self-reported calcium intake, self-reported physical activity, and vertebral and hip fractures, as well as percentage changes in these variables between baseline and follow-up studies were included in the model. Differences among quartiles were assessed by ANOVA (31).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cross-sectional study

CT digital data indicated that the prevalence of aortic calcification, osteoporosis (defined as a value for cancellous bone density 2.5 SD below peak values), and vertebral and/or proximal femur fractures increased with age (Table 1Go). Overall, measures of aortic calcification correlated as follows: moderate correlation with age (r = 0.50; P < 0.001), years post menopause (r = 0.49; P < 0.001), and bone density (r = –0.35; P < 0.001); weak correlation with values for vertebral and hip fractures (r = 0.23 and 0.13, respectively; both P values < 0.001), physical exercise (r = 0.23; P < 0.001), and systolic blood pressure (r = 0.16; P < 0.001); and no correlation with BMI, diastolic blood pressure, or calcium intake.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Prevalence of any aortic calcification, osteoporosis, and vertebral and hip fractures in the cross-sectional study of 2348 women

 
The characteristics of the participants with and without aortic calcified plaques are described in Table 2Go. Women with aortic calcification were older, further from menopause, less physically active, and had higher systolic blood pressure, lower bone density, and a greater number of vertebral and hip fractures. Regression models showed that these differences did not remain significant once age was taken into account. In contrast, aortic calcification had a significantly independent association with bone density. After adjusting for age, measures of aortic calcification (AC) predicted 26.1% of the variance in bone density (BD): AC = –137.041 – 0.240*BD + 3.101*Age. Similar findings were observed when the entire population was divided into four equal strata (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Clinical characteristics and CT values in the cross-sectional study of 2348 women

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Relation between degrees of aortic calcification and bone density by calcification in the cross-sectional study of 2348 women

 
Two-group regression analysis indicated that the percentage of women with vertebral fractures was significantly greater in subjects with aortic calcification than those without, and these differences increased with age (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2Go). Overall, the estimate of the relative risk for vertebral fractures in women with aortic calcification was 4.8 (95% confidence interval, 3.6–6.5) when compared with women without calcification. However, the estimate differed among age groups. For example, the odds ratio for vertebral fractures in women with calcification was estimated to be 2.2 at the ages of 50–54 yr and rose to 4.0 by 80–84 yr of age. Figure 3Go also shows that in women with fractures, the number of vertebral fractures was significantly greater in subjects with aortic calcification than those without. This was true for younger age categories and when assessing the number of fractures in subjects with and without calcification as a vector of observations for all age categories [Hotelling’s T2 test (P = 0.03)]. Similarly, both the prevalence and the number of hip fractures were significantly greater in women with aortic calcification than those without (Fig. 4Go). The estimate of the relative risk for proximal femur fractures in women with aortic calcification was 2.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.8–4.8) when compared with women without calcification. Among subjects with fractures, bilateral hip fractures were more common in women with aortic calcification than those without [14.3 vs. 19.8% (P = 0.04)].



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Number and percentage of vertebral fractures in women 50–94 yr of age with and without aortic calcification according to 5-yr age categories. Black bars indicate mean and SD for fractures in women with aortic calcification; white bars indicate mean and SD for fractures in women without calcification. Significant differences in the number of fractures were present in the three younger categories (*, P = 0.003; **, P = 0.001) and when assessing the number of fractures for all age categories as a vector of observations (Hotelling’s T2 test; P = 0.03). The mean value for the percentage of fractures at each age category is depicted as small black squares for women with calcification and small white diamonds for women without calcification. The regression lines for women with calcification (continuous line) and for women without calcification (intermittent line) differed significantly (P < 0.001). Y, Percentage of fractures; X, age category 1–9; N, number of subjects in each age category; §, median age for subjects without/with aortic calcification, respectively.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Percentage of hip fractures in women 50–94 yr of age with and without calcification according to 10-yr age categories. The mean value for the percentage of fractures at each age category is depicted as small black squares for women with calcification and small white diamonds for women without calcification. The regression lines for women with calcification (continuous line) and women without calcification (intermittent line) did not differ significantly (P = 0.15). Y, Percentage of fractures; X, age category 1–5; N, number of subjects in each age category; §, median age for subjects without/with aortic calcification, respectively.

 
Longitudinal study

The longitudinal cohort consisted of 228 postmenopausal women, ages 65.2 ± 9.8 yr, who had repeat CT studies 2.1 ± 1.9 yr after the initial examination (median, 15.3 months; interquartile range, 14 months). Subjects with aortic calcification were significantly older, had lower bone density, and had a greater number of vertebral and hip fractures both at baseline and at the final CT measurement (all P values < 0.001).

At follow-up, there were no significant differences in body mass, blood pressure, self-reported calcium intake, self-reported physical activity, or number of hip fractures. In contrast, values for aortic calcification, bone density, and vertebral fractures changed significantly (all P values <0.001). On average, in subjects with baseline calcification, the yearly rate of progression in aortic calcification was 13.8%, and the yearly rate of bone loss 2.6%, but there was a wide distribution of values. Stepwise regression analysis indicated that the rate of change in aortic calcification accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in the yearly rate of bone loss and that once this independent variable entered into the equation, no other covariate increased the predictive power of the model. This was true whether rates of bone loss and aortic calcification gains were assessed as yearly percentage change or as yearly changes in absolute values; BD = 1.57 + 0.0806 AC (r2 = 0.471; P < 0.001) and BD = 163.83 + 0.117X (r2 = 0.223; P < 0.001), respectively (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Scattergram indicating the yearly gains in aortic calcification (x-axis) and bone loss (y-axis) as percentage change (A) and change in absolute values (B) in the cohort of 228 subjects longitudinally studied (r2 = 0.47 and 0.22, respectively; both P values <0.001).

 
Compared with women 60 yr old and younger without aortic calcification, women of similar age and years post menopause with calcified plaques had less than half the mean annual percentage bone loss (3.4 ± 2.1 vs. 1.4 ± 1.07; P < 0.001). Moreover, when postmenopausal women with vascular calcification were divided into quartiles based on the percentage change for aortic calcification, a strong graded relation was observed between the progression of vascular calcification and bone loss for each quartile (Fig. 6Go). Women in the highest quartile for gains in aortic calcification had four times greater yearly bone loss (5.3 vs. 1.3% yearly; P < 0.001) than women of similar age in the lowest quartile. Smaller, but highly significant differences were also found between all other quartile comparisons.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Yearly percentage gains in aortic calcification and bone loss in the 157 women longitudinally studied with vascular calcifications at baseline. Subjects were divided into quartiles based on rates of change in aortic calcification. The different scales represent the range of yearly gains or losses for aortic calcification and bone density, respectively. Numbers in parentheses represent the age in years. Values are mean ± SD.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study suggests an independent association between calcified plaques in the aorta, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and the two morphological traits characterizing osteoporosis: bone density and fragility fractures (17, 24). We found a significant age-independent association between the degree of aortic calcification and bone density and a strong inverse relation between gains in vascular calcification and bone loss. Overall, the yearly percentage gains in aortic calcification accounted for nearly 50% of the variance in the percentage rate of bone loss. When subjects with vascular calcifications were divided into quartiles based on the percentage change for aortic calcification, a graded association was observed between the progression of vascular calcification and bone loss for each quartile. Women in the highest quartile for yearly gains in aortic calcification had four times greater bone loss (5.3 vs. 1.3% yearly) than women of similar age in the lowest quartile, and significant differences were also found between all other quartile comparisons. Lastly, our results suggest that both the percentage of women with fractures and the number of fractures are significantly greater in subjects with aortic calcification than those without. Estimates of the relative risk for vertebral and hip fractures were about 5- and 3-fold more common, respectively, in women with aortic calcification.

Our results, showing that women with vascular calcifications are predisposed to osteoporosis and fragility fractures, complement existing epidemiological data indicating that women with osteoporosis are at an increased risk of mortality that is unrelated to the occurrence of fractures but is due to stroke or coronary disease (32, 33). Some have suggested that low bone mass is an even stronger predictor of cardiovascular disease than other well-known risk factors, such as serum cholesterol and smoking (32, 33). Similarly, the results of the subgroup of subjects longitudinally studied, showing that women with a rapid progression of vascular calcification are at increased risk for osteoporosis, complement published data indicating that older women who lose bone rapidly have an increased rate of mortality due to cardiovascular disease (34).

The large sample size, the inclusion of a longitudinal arm, and the use of CT to obtain graded measures of skeletal and vascular calcification are strengths of the present study. Previous studies on the possible links between aortic calcification and bone density were limited by the use of projection techniques and simply ranked vascular calcification as present or absent, yielding discrepant results (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 35, 36). In addition, measurements of bone mineral content in the axial skeleton with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are inaccurately high in the presence of calcified plaques in the adjacent aorta, which are incorporated in the region of interest (18, 19, 20). It is noteworthy that the previous cross-sectional study with the largest cohort of postmenopausal Caucasian women (2051 subjects older than 65 yr) found no independent association and attributed the relation between vascular calcifications and bone loss measured by DXA to the aging process (3). Similarly, the results of a smaller longitudinal study, also using DXA, found measures of bone loss in postmenopausal women to be unrelated to aortic calcification (15).

There are several limitations in this study. First, the retrospective design did not allow for a rigorous collection of all pertinent data. It should be stressed, however, that the retrospective approach did not influence the main outcome variables of the current study: objective quantitative measures of traits associated with osteoporosis and atherosclerosis. Second, the subjects were not recruited from the community at large, but were selected from patients who underwent bone density determinations. This selection bias likely explains the relatively high prevalence of osteoporosis and fractures in the subjects studied (37). Any bias, however, introduced by the method of selection should not have influenced the results. Third, we examined only women of European descent, and therefore our results may not apply to men or to other ethnic groups. Lastly, it is impossible to determine whether the association we found represents a causal relation between skeletal and vascular mineralization or a confounding effect due to sex steroids, calcium-regulated hormones, vitamin K, homocysteine, lipid oxidation products, or other yet-to-be-identified metabolic or hormonal factors (38).

Much of the evidence for a causal relationship comes from basic research and from studies in experimental animals, suggesting that arterial tissue is calcified in an organized, regulated process by mechanisms similar to those involved in the mineralization of bone. The mineral deposit in the arterial wall, hydroxyapatite, is the same mineral found in bone, and it is structurally arranged with trabeculae and lacunae visible in the calcific deposit (39). Molecular biological studies indicate that regulated osteogenesis may occur in some cells of the arterial wall (40). Indeed, cells with both osteoblastic and osteoclastic potential have been described in vascular tissues, and bone-related proteins have been identified in calcified arterial lesions (40, 41, 42). Moreover, genetically engineered animals, susceptible to the development of calcified atherosclerotic lesions, have low values for bone density, whereas those resistant to the development of atherosclerotic lesions have higher bone density values (43, 44). Recently, statins, long recognized to be effective in lowering cholesterol levels and reducing cardiovascular risk, have been shown to trigger bone formation in tissue cultures and animals studies (45). In humans, several observational studies have suggested that statins are associated with increased bone mineral density and a reduced fracture risk (46, 47).

Regardless of the mechanism responsible for the simultaneous mineralization of vascular and skeletal tissues, the findings of this study have significant clinical implications with regard to the identification of elderly women at risk for osteoporosis. We found that postmenopausal women 60 yr of age and younger with aortic calcification had more than double the rate of bone loss (3.4 vs. 1.4% yearly) as women without calcified plaques. Because approximately 15% of all abdominal radiographs and 50% of all abdominal CT studies in women 50–60 yr of age depict aortic calcification (2), this finding provides an imaging marker for the identification of a large population of women who have accelerated bone loss and are at greatest risk for osteoporosis. Future studies are needed to determine the specificity and sensitivity of aortic calcifications in predicting fracture risk.

In conclusion, the results of the current study disagree with the classic notion that, in human aging, the inevitable progressive deterioration of every system is organ and cell specific (48). At least with reference to the skeletal and vascular tissues, the deterioration occurs at the same time, and the rate of decline progresses in parallel. The findings of this study, showing that beyond the aging process there is a significant relation between atherosclerosis and osteoporosis, should encourage research on the mechanisms regulating mineral deposition in connective tissues. They also support the search for effective prevention and treatment strategies that may simultaneously modify the risk for these two common conditions. Lastly, knowledge that in young, postmenopausal women the presence of calcified plaques in the aorta is associated with accelerated bone loss should aid in the early identification of subjects at risk for osteoporosis and fractures.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (N01-HD-1-3333-01 and R01 LM06270-05) and from the Department of the Army (DAMD17-01-1-0817).

Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CT, computed tomography; CV, coefficient of variation; DXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Received June 4, 2003.

Accepted February 18, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Anderson JB, Barnett E, Nordin BEC 1964 The relation between osteoporosis and aortic calcification. Br J Radiol 37:910–912
  2. Frye MA, Melton 3rd LJ, Bryant SC, Fitzpatrick LA, Wahner HW, Schwartz RS, Riggs BL 1992 Osteoporosis and calcification of the aorta. Bone Miner 19:185–194[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Vogt MT, San Valentin R, Forrest KYZ, Nevitt MC, Cauley JA 1997 Bone mineral density and aortic calcification: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:140–145[Medline]
  4. Boukhris R, Becker KL 1972 Calcification of the aorta and osteoporosis. A roentgenographic study. JAMA 219:1307–1311[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Barengolts EI, Berman M, Kukreja SC, Kouznetsova T, Lin C, Chomka EV 1998 Osteoporosis and coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 62:209–213[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Ouchi Y, Akishita M, deSouza AC, Nakamura T, Orimo H 1993 Age-related loss of bone mass and aortic/aortic valve calcification—reevaluation of recommended dietary allowance of calcium in the elderly. Ann NY Acad Sci 676:297–307[Medline]
  7. Jie KG, Bots ML, Vermeer C, Witteman JC, Grobbee DE 1996 Vitamin K status and bone mass in women with and without aortic atherosclerosis: a population-based study. Calcif Tissue Int 59:352–356[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Hak AE, Pols HAP, van Hemert AM, Hofman A, Witteman JCM 2000 Progression of aortic calcification is associated with metacarpal bone loss during menopause: a population-based longitudinal study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20:1926–1931[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kiel DP, Kauppila LI, Cupples LA, Hannan MT, O’Donnell CJ, Wilson PWF 2001 Bone loss and the progression of abdominal aortic calcification over a 25 year period: the Framingham Heart Study. Calcif Tissue Int 68:271–276[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Laroche M, Pouilles JM, Ribot C, Bendayan P, Bernard J, Boccalon H, Mazieres B 1994 Comparison of the bone mineral content of the lower limbs in men with ischaemic atherosclerotic disease. Clin Rheumatol 13:611–614[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Fujita T, Okamoto Y, Sakagami Y, Ota K, Ohata M 1984 Bone changes and aortic calcification in aging inhabitants of mountain versus seacoast communities in the Kii Peninsula. J Am Geriatr Soc 32:124–128[Medline]
  12. Driessens FCM, Steidl L, Verbeeck RMH, Ditmar R 1991 Relation between osteoporosis and aorta calcification and its physiological explanation. Magnes Bull 13:100–102
  13. Jensen GF 1986 Spinal osteoporosis: a local vascular disease? Calcif Tissue Int 39:62 (Abstract)
  14. Dent CE, Engelbrecht HE, Godfrey RC 1968 Osteoporosis of lumbar vertebrae and calcification of abdominal aorta in women living in Durban. Br Med J 4:76–79
  15. Reid IR, Ames RW, Evans MC, Sharpe SJ, Gamble GD 1994 Determinants of the rate of bone loss in normal postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:950–954[Abstract]
  16. Hyman JB, Epstein FH 1954 A study of the correlation between roentgenographic and post-mortem calcification of the aorta. Am Heart J 48:540–543[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Genant HK, Engelke K, Fuerst T, Gluer CC, Grampp S, Harris ST, Jergas M, Lang T, Lu Y, Majumdar S, Mathur A, Takada M 1996 Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res 11:707–730[Medline]
  18. Whitehouse RW, Karantanas A, Adams JE 1992 Discrepancies in spinal bone mass measured by QCT and DXA. In: Ring EFG, ed. Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement II. London and Bath: British Institute of Radiology; 26
  19. Banks LM, Lees B, MacSweeney JE, Stevenson JC 1994 Effect of degenerative spinal and aortic calcification on bone density measurements in post-menopausal women: links between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease? Eur J Clin Invest 24:813–817[Medline]
  20. Drinka PJ, DeSmet AA, Bauwens SF, Rogot A 1992 The effect of overlying calcification on lumbar bone densitometry. Calcif Tissue Int 50:507–510[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte Jr M, Detrano R 1990 Quantification of coronary artery calcification using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832[Abstract]
  22. Rumberger JA, Schwartz RS, Simons DB, Sheedy III PF, Edwards WD, Fitzpatrick LA 1994 Relation of coronary calcium determined by electron beam computed tomography and lumen narrowing determined by autopsy. Am J Cardiol 74:1169–1173
  23. Curry III TS, Dowdey JE, Murry Jr RC 1990 Computed tomography. In: Curry III TS, Dowdey JE, Murry Jr RC, eds. Christensen’s physics of diagnostic radiology. Philadelphia: Lea, Febiger; 289–322
  24. Witteman JCM, Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, D’Agostino RB, Cobb JC 1990 Aortic calcified plaques and cardiovascular disease (The Framingham Study). Am J Cardiol 66:1060–1064[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Bain C, Witschi J, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE 1985 Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 122:51–65[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Fitti JE, Kovar MG 1987 The Supplement on Aging to the 1984 National Health Interview Survey. Vital Health Stat 1:1–115
  27. Gilsanz V, Loro ML, Roe TF, Sayre J, Gilsanz R, Schulz EE 1995 Vertebral size in elderly women with osteoporosis. Mechanical implications and relationship to fractures. J Clin Invest 95:2332–2337
  28. Kanis JA, Melton III LJ, Christiansen C, Johnson CC, Khaltaev N 1994 The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141[Medline]
  29. Dixon WJ, Massey FJ 1983 Introduction to statistical analysis. New York: McGraw Hill Inc.; 241–271
  30. Morrison DF 1990 Multivariate statistical methods. New York: McGraw Hill Inc.; 131–199
  31. Crowder MJ, Hand DJ 1990 Analysis of repeated measures. London: Chapman & Hall; 110–117
  32. von der Recke P, Hansen MA, Hassager C 1999 The association between low bone mass at the menopause and cardiovascular mortality. Am J Med 106:273–278[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Browner WS, Seeley DG, Vogt TM, Cummings SR 1991 Non-trauma mortality in elderly women with low bone mineral density. Lancet 338:355–358[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Kado DM, Browner WS, Blackwell T, Gore R, Cummings SR 2000 Rate of bone loss is associated with mortality in older women: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 15:1974–1980[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Uyama O, Yoshimoto Y, Yamamoto Y, Kawai A 1997 Bone changes and carotid atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women. Stroke 28:1730–1732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Orimo H, Terashita K, Nakamura T, Ohshima J 1985 Ca and atherosclerosis. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 31(Suppl):S33–S36
  37. Black DM, Cooper C 2000 Epidemiology of fractures and assessment of fracture risk. Clin Lab Med 20:439–453[Medline]
  38. Demer LL, Watson KE, Bostrom K 1994 Mechanism of calcification in atherosclerosis. Trends Cardiovasc Med 4:45–49[CrossRef]
  39. Schmid K, McSharry WO, Pameijer CH, Binette JP 1980 Chemical and physiochemical studies on the mineral deposits of the human atherosclerotic aorta. Atherosclerosis 37:199–210[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Bostrom K, Watson KE, Horn S, Wortham C, Herman IM, Demer LL 1993 Bone morphogenetic protein expression in human atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest 91:1800–1809
  41. Shanahan CM, Cary NRB, Metcalfe JC, Weissberg PL 1994 High expression of genes for calcification-regulating proteins in human atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest 93:2393–2402
  42. Gijsbers BL, van Haarlem LJM, Soute BAM, Ebbeink RHM, Vermeer C 1990 Characterization of a Gla-containing protein from calcified human atherosclerotic plaques. Arteriosclerosis 10:991–995[Abstract]
  43. Naito S, Ito M, Sekine I, Ito M, Hirano T, Iwasaki K, Niwa M 1993 Femoral head necrosis and osteopenia in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSPs). Bone 14:745–753[Medline]
  44. Parhami F, Tintut Y, Beamer WG, Gharavi N, Goodman W, Demer LL 2001 Atherogenic high-fat diet reduces bone mineralization in mice. J Bone Miner Res 16:182–188[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Mundy G, Garrett R, Harris S, Chan J, Chen D, Rissini G, Boyce B, Zhao M, Gutierrez G 1999 Stimulation of bone formation in vitro and in rodents by statins. Science 286:1946–1949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Edwards CJ, Hart DJ, Spector TD 2000 Oral statins and increased bone-mineral density in postmenopausal women. Lancet 355:2218–2219[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Meier CR, Schlienger RG, Kraenzlin ME, Schlegel B, Jick H 2000 HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and the risk of fractures. JAMA 283:3205–3210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Resnick NM 1998 Geriatric medicine. In: Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Isselbacher KJ, eds. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 14th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 37–45



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. N. Bakhireva, G. A. Laughlin, R. Bettencourt, and E. Barrett-Connor
Does Osteoprotegerin or Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand Mediate the Association between Bone and Coronary Artery Calcification?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 2009 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
P. Raggi and M. Kleerekoper
Contribution of Bone and Mineral Abnormalities to Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 3(3): 836 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
A. E. Kearns, S. Khosla, and P. J. Kostenuik
Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor {kappa}B Ligand and Osteoprotegerin Regulation of Bone Remodeling in Health and Disease
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2008; 29(2): 155 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. Reddy, J. P. Bilezikian, S. J. Smith, and L. Mosca
Reduced Bone Mineral Density Is Associated with Breast Arterial Calcification
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 208 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
D. L. Andress
Bone and Mineral Guidelines for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Call for Revision
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 179 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. C. Manolagas and M. Almeida
Gone with the Wnts: {beta}-Catenin, T-Cell Factor, Forkhead Box O, and Oxidative Stress in Age-Dependent Diseases of Bone, Lipid, and Glucose Metabolism
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 21(11): 2605 - 2614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Almeida, L. Han, M. Martin-Millan, L. I. Plotkin, S. A. Stewart, P. K. Roberson, S. Kousteni, C. A. O'Brien, T. Bellido, A. M. Parfitt, et al.
Skeletal Involution by Age-associated Oxidative Stress and Its Acceleration by Loss of Sex Steroids
J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 27285 - 27297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. Vogelmeier and R. Bals
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Premature Aging
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2007; 175(12): 1217 - 1218.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. Sabit, C. E. Bolton, P. H. Edwards, R. J. Pettit, W. D. Evans, C. M. McEniery, I. B. Wilkinson, J. R. Cockcroft, and D. J. Shale
Arterial Stiffness and Osteoporosis in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2007; 175(12): 1259 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
W. Marz, U. Seelhorst, B. Wellnitz, B. Tiran, B. Obermayer-Pietsch, W. Renner, B. O. Boehm, E. Ritz, and M. M. Hoffmann
Alanine to Serine Polymorphism at Position 986 of the Calcium-Sensing Receptor Associated with Coronary Heart Disease, Myocardial Infarction, All-Cause, and Cardiovascular Mortality
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 2363 - 2369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
P. Raggi, A. Bellasi, E. Ferramosca, G. A. Block, and P. Muntner
Pulse Wave Velocity Is Inversely Related to Vertebral Bone Density in Hemodialysis Patients
Hypertension, June 1, 2007; 49(6): 1278 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. B. Lehtinen, K. P. Burdon, J. P. Lewis, C. D. Langefeld, J. T. Ziegler, S. S. Rich, T. C. Register, J. J. Carr, B. I. Freedman, and D. W. Bowden
Association of {alpha}2-Heremans-Schmid Glycoprotein Polymorphisms with Subclinical Atherosclerosis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 345 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. C. Bezerra, G. D. Calomeni, V. F. Caparbo, E. S. Gebrim, M. S. Rocha, and R. M. R. Pereira
Low bone density and low serum levels of soluble RANK ligand are associated with severe arterial calcification in patients with Takayasu arteritis
Rheumatology, December 1, 2005; 44(12): 1503 - 1506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mineral MagHome page
H. C. W. Skinner
Biominerals
Mineralogical Magazine, October 1, 2005; 69(5): 621 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
D. Hamerman
Osteoporosis and atherosclerosis: biological linkages and the emergence of dual-purpose therapies
QJM, July 1, 2005; 98(7): 467 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. A. Ali, R. S. Weinstein, S. A. Stewart, A. M. Parfitt, S. C. Manolagas, and R. L. Jilka
Rosiglitazone Causes Bone Loss in Mice by Suppressing Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Formation
Endocrinology, March 1, 2005; 146(3): 1226 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. R. Rubin and S. J. Silverberg
Vascular Calcification and Osteoporosis--The Nature of the Nexus
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4243 - 4245.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission