| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Endocrinology (P.V.C., W.M.D., K.T.M., K.M., C.C.-H., M.O.S., J.P.M.), St. Bartholomews Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom; Department of Paediatric Endocrinology (N.J.S.), The Birmingham Childrens Hospital, Birmingham B4 6NH, United Kingdom; Department of Paediatric Endocrinology (D.B.D.), The John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom; and Department of Paediatric Endocrinology (T.D.C.), The Royal Infirmary, Newcastle NE1 4LP, United Kingdom
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: P. V. Carroll, Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, St. Thomas Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom. E-mail: paul.carroll{at}gstt.nhs.uk.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
No endocrine differences were evident between the groups at baseline. GH cessation resulted in a reduction of serum IGF-I Z score [1.62 ± 0.29, baseline vs. 2.52 ± 0.12, 6 months (P < 0.05) vs. 2.52 ± 0.10, 12 months (P < 0.01)] but values remained unchanged in those continuing GH replacement. Lean body mass increased by 2.5 ± 0.5 kg (
6%) over 12 months in those receiving GH but was unchanged after GH discontinuation. Cessation of GH resulted in increased insulin sensitivity [short insulin tolerance test, 153 ± 22 µmol/liter·min, baseline vs. 187 ± 20, 6 months (P < 0.05) vs. 204 ± 14, 12 months (P = 0.05)], but no significant change was seen during 12 months of GH continuation. Lipid levels remained unaltered in both groups.
Continuation of GH at completion of linear growth resulted in ongoing accrual of lean body mass (LBM), whereas skeletal muscle mass remained static after GH cessation in these adolescents with GHD. This divergence of gain in LBM is of potential importance because increases in LBM occur as a feature of healthy late adolescent development. GH is a major mediator of insulin sensitivity, independent of body composition in adolescents. Further studies are required to determine whether discontinuation of GH in the adolescent with severe GHD once linear growth is complete results in long-term irreversible adverse physical and metabolic consequences and to determine conclusively the benefits of continuing GH therapy.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The precise evolution of the GHD syndrome after discontinuation of GH in adolescents whose linear growth is complete has not yet been established (9). Recently investigators have begun to study whether discontinuation of GH at adult height results in adverse consequences in the adolescent with severe GHD (10, 11). It is established that patients with childhood-onset GHD are shorter and have reduced lean body mass (LBM), compared with those that have acquired GHD in adult life (12). Evidence to date suggests that discontinuation of GH at completion of linear growth may result in adverse effects on body composition and lipoprotein levels, but there is controversy as to whether these abnormalities predispose to early atherosclerosis (13, 14, 15). As a result of the relative rarity of hypopituitarism and difficulties performing long-term studies in adolescents, the optimal approach to the management of GH treatment between cessation of linear growth and full adulthood has yet to be established.
To increase understanding of the complex role of GH in the regulation of the physical and metabolic changes of adolescent development in GHD, we performed this prospective U.K. multicenter study. At completion of linear growth, body composition, insulin sensitivity, and lipid levels were studied over 12 months in parallel groups of adolescent patients, either continuing or discontinuing GH, all of whom had confirmed ongoing severe GHD.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twenty-four patients were recruited from growth clinics in the four contributing centers. The clinical details and etiology of GHD are summarized in Table 1
. Thirteen males and 11 females aged 17.0 ± 0.3 yr, mean ± SE (range 1420 yr), were included. Fourteen had multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies, and these patients were receiving stable substitution with hydrocortisone, L-thyroxine, sex steroids, and 1-desamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin as necessary. Patients with coexistent chronic disease, diabetes mellitus, or functioning pituitary tumors were excluded. All patients had been shown to have severe GHD and had been receiving GH for at least the previous 5 yr (and more than 8 yr in the majority) to promote linear growth. The patients were selected on the basis of achievement of adult height each having a growth velocity less than 2 cm/yr. Although we intended for this to be a fully randomized trial, a number of patients expressed a strong preference for either continuation or cessation of GH treatment. Accordingly, 70% of the patients included were randomized to continue or discontinue GH, with the remainder being treated according to individual preference.
|
Study protocol
In those willing to participate, GH was discontinued for 7 d before the performance of a provocative test of GH reserve (insulin-hypoglycemia; 0.15 U/kg iv was used in all but one patient who underwent a glucagon test; 1.0 mg sc). All patients had severe GHD, defined as a peak GH response less than 9 mU/liter (3 µg/liter) (18). Screened patients who had recovered GH secretion had GH treatment stopped and were not included in the study. A total of approximately 50 patients were considered for inclusion and underwent retesting, with severe GHD identified in the 24 included in the study. Therefore, in keeping with previous U.K. experience, recovery of GH secretion had occurred in half those patients previously identified as having GHD (19). In eligible patients the prestudy dose, which varied between individuals and centers, was recommenced for a 3-month lead-in before performance of baseline evaluations. In patients continuing GH, a standard dose of 0.35 U/kg·wk (0.12 mg/kg·wk) was self-administered (2200 h) in single daily doses. In those discontinuing GH, no placebo injection was used.
Measurements
Body composition, insulin sensitivity, and serum lipoproteins were assessed at baseline and 6 and 12 months in all subjects. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry was used to measure body composition. Baseline and follow-up scans were performed on the same instrument for each patient, and each machine underwent daily standard calibration using the appropriate manufacturers phantom. The software used were those employed as part of routine practice in the local centers. Either a Lunar DPX (General Electric, Madison, WI) or QDR-1000 (Hologic Inc., Waltham, MA) scanning system was used, depending on local availability, and data for whole-body LBM, fat mass (FM), percent FM, and truncal FM were produced using standard software.
Insulin sensitivity was measured using two techniques. Fasting specific plasma insulin and plasma glucose concentrations were used to calculate the percentage sensitivity (%S), a measure of whole-body insulin sensitivity (IS) using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) technique (20). Additionally whole-body IS was determined using a short insulin tolerance test (ITT) method (21). After an overnight fast, 0.1 U/kg iv soluble insulin was administered with frequent blood sampling for plasma glucose taken for up to 15 min. A linear plot of the slope of the glucose line taken from 3 to 15 min corresponded to IS, expressed as micromoles per liter per minute.
Serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and serum triglycerides were measured in the postabsorptive state on each occasion. Bone remodeling and bone mineral density data from these patient cohorts have been reported previously (22).
Laboratory assays
Laboratory assays were performed in the lead center (St. Bartholomews Hospital). Plasma glucose and serum GH were measured using standard automated techniques (Immulite 200, Diagnostic Products Corp., Gwynedd, UK). Serum cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides were assessed using conventional methodology for the AU 640 analyzer (Olympus Optical Co., London, UK). LDL cholesterol was calculated using Friedewalds equation (23). Serum IGF-I was measured using an in-house RIA after formic acid-acetone extraction as previously described (24). Specific insulin was assessed using a commercially available immunoenzymatic assay (Biosource S.A., Fleurus, Belgium). Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 5.3 and 5.6%, respectively.
Statistical analyses
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Analyses were performed using Arcus Quickstat (Longman Software Publishing, Cambridge, UK). Comparisons were made within groups using the Students t test and between groups using Mann-Whitney U test. Correlations were performed using Spearmans rank coefficient. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Serum IGF-I
Individual serum IGF-I Z scores are shown in Fig. 1
. The baseline IGF-I concentrations were widely variable at baseline in both groups. However, the baseline mean values for total IGF-I were similar between groups (337 ± 56, 257 ± 42, ng/ml, GH continuing and discontinuing, respectively; Z score 1.08 ± 0.38, 1.62 ± 0.29, GH continuing and discontinuing respectively).
|
Body composition
Body composition values at baseline and throughout the study are summarized in Table 2
. At baseline similar LBM, FM, percent fat mass, and truncal FM were observed between the groups. LBM increased during GH continuation but remained unchanged in those stopping GH treatment (Fig. 2
). No significant changes in FM were recorded in either group.
|
|
Baseline insulin sensitivity was similar between groups as assessed by either HOMA %S (Table 3
) or the short ITT (Fig. 3
). Insulin sensitivity as assessed by the short ITT increased significantly after GH cessation, but the trend in HOMA %S was not significant. No changes in IS were noted using either method in those remaining on GH replacement.
|
|
Similar values for total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and serum triglycerides were seen at baseline in both groups. No changes occurred throughout the study in any of these variables with either continuation or cessation of GH replacement (Table 3
).
Relationships between variables
The change in IGF-I between baseline and 12 months (
IGF-I) correlated with the change (
) in FM over the same period [P < 0.05, Spearmans rank correlation coefficient (0.54)]. A similar correlation was seen between
IGF-I and
%Fat at 12 months (P = 0.05, 0.43). A negative relationship was recorded between
LBM and
%S at 1 yr (P = 0.02, 0.56).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The baseline total serum IGF-I concentrations reflected real-life practice with a wide range of observed values across the group of patients. At commencement of the study, mean IGF-I concentrations were similar in those continuing and stopping GH treatment, with calculated Z scores beneath the mean value. The wide baseline variability was not related to the dose of GH before commencement of the study and may in part be explained by compliance issues, individual sensitivity to GH, estrogen use, body composition, and exercise activity. Although traditionally GH treatment in the pediatric population is not titrated against serum IGF-I levels, this U.K. population at baseline, while receiving GH treatment, did not have elevated IGF-I concentrations. Discontinuation of GH resulted in a marked reduction of IGF-I, reflected by a negative Z score, but continued GH at a dose of 0.35 U/kg·wk (0.12 mg/kg·wk) maintained IGF-I levels. Importantly, in those who remained on GH, similar levels of IGF-I (and Z score) were recorded at 6 months and 1 yr, supporting continuing compliance in this group. These baseline IGF-I values were similar to those reported in a study of Danish adolescents with GHD (25) but are substantially lower than a previously reported discontinuation study (14), perhaps reflecting national differences in pediatric GH dosing regimens.
Continuation of GH treatment was associated with gain in whole-body LBM at 6 and 12 months. In contrast, no net change in LBM was observed over 1 yr in patients discontinuing GH replacement. Although linear growth was virtually complete at entry to the study, it is unlikely that full skeletal and body compositional maturation had occurred by completion of our observations. At termination of the study, the patients were aged approximately 19 yr, and it is established that further gains in LBM continue until the age of 2225 yr in the healthy population (26). It is of potential importance that GH cessation was associated with an absolutely static LBM, compared with the more normal 6% annual accrual seen in the group receiving GH. Previous studies have shown either reduced (27) or static LBM (13) after discontinuation of GH therapy in adolescents with GHD. In the latter study, recommencement of GH replacement after 12 months cessation resulted in approximately 16% increase in LBM over the following year. Decreased LBM has been reported after 24 months GH cessation in a Swedish population of adolescents with GHD; however, the baseline IGF-I concentrations reported in this study were high, and it is conceivable that the changes in body composition reflected previous supraphysiological treatment (14). In totality the available data indicate that LBM remains static or is moderately reduced after GH cessation in adolescents with GHD. In those remaining on GH, continuing increases in LBM are seen over 12 months after cessation of linear growth.
Although no changes in FM were demonstrated in either group, a previous study has shown increased FM after GH cessation in adolescents with GHD (13). In the latter study, increases in whole-body and abdominal FM were seen 12 months after discontinuation of GH, and resumption of GH treatment resulted in reduced FM. Increases in FM were also observed in both GHD and healthy adolescents in the Swedish GH withdrawal study over 2 yr (14). Although increases in FM may be a feature of healthy changes in body composition, the cumulative data provide evidence that adolescents with GHD are more prone to gains in adipose tissue. In our study it is possible that a 12-month period was too short for statistically significant changes to occur.
Increased IS occurred after cessation of GH treatment. It is recognized that adult-onset GHD is associated with relative insulin insensitivity, and GH replacement may worsen insulin sensitivity in the initial phase (28). Furthermore, concern has been expressed that GH administration in adolescents may exacerbate or cause type 2 diabetes mellitus (29). Within 6 months of GH cessation, increased IS was recorded using the short ITT, which was maintained at 12 months. These increases occurred despite a trend toward increased FM and no gain in LBM over the same period. In the current study, there was no significant change in HOMA %S, but a divergent trend was seen between the groups. Increases in IS were reported in a study of Danish adolescents with GHD after GH cessation (25). Using the hyperinsulinemic clamp technique, these investigators demonstrated similarly increased IS despite increased whole-body FM. In the present study, IS remained unchanged despite increased LBM and unchanged FM in subjects continuing GH replacement.
These complementary techniques comprehensively illustrate the importance of GH in the regulation of IS, independent of changes in body composition in the adolescent. However, whether the reduced IS while on treatment with respect to carbohydrate metabolism has adverse consequences has yet to be fully established. IS is reduced during normal puberty, in part related to increased endogenous GH secretion (30). It is conceivable that some of the anabolic effects on skeletal and LBM mass seen with normal puberty and during exogenous GH treatment are mediated through relatively decreased whole-body IS, resulting in increased insulin concentrations with consequent effects on protein and fat metabolism (31).
No striking effects on lipid levels were seen either during GH continuation or after GH cessation in these adolescent patients. Specifically, despite increased IS in those stopping GH treatment, no trends toward increased HDL cholesterol and reduced triglycerides were seen. In adults with GHD, reductions in LDL cholesterol have been documented during GH replacement (2). The unchanged serum lipid levels in the current study may be explained by the very normal levels at baseline and are similar to results reported in a previous study of adolescents with GHD (13). In contrast, other investigators documented increased LDL cholesterol and reduced HDL cholesterol after GH cessation in adolescent GHD (14). It is conceivable that the high IGF-I levels (reflecting a higher GH treatment dose) indicated a supraphysiological effect not observed in the current study in which lower doses of GH were administered. Divergent trends were not evident between those continuing and those stopping GH, suggesting that in these U.K. adolescents, GH was not a major mediator of serum lipid levels, at least in the short term. These data indicate that the elevated LDL/reduced HDL cholesterol pattern characteristic of GHD in adults evolves over a period in excess of 12 months and involves more than acute alterations in IS and body composition.
This study included patients with organic structural pathologies accounting for hypopituitarism and adolescents with idiopathic GHD. No clear differences in baseline characteristics were demonstrable depending on etiology. Similarly, the response to continuation/discontinuation was not evidently different between these populations.
It is not known whether cessation of GH treatment at achievement of adult height results in long-term adverse consequences for the adolescent with ongoing GHD. In practice GH replacement is frequently discontinued, and long-term GH replacement may not be reconsidered until the transition from pediatric to adult endocrine care is complete. This U.K. multicenter study indicates that accrual of LBM continues in patients remaining on GH replacement after completion of linear growth. In contrast, LBM remains unchanged despite increased insulin sensitivity over 12 months after GH cessation. These differences in skeletal muscle development are of potential importance because it is recognized that patients with childhood-onset GHD have reduced LBM, compared with those with adult-onset hypopituitarism. Additionally, continued gains in LBM are a feature of healthy physical development after linear growth ceases.
We advocate retesting adolescents with severe GHD requiring GH treatment to promote growth once adult height is achieved. Those patients with ongoing severe GHD should be considered for continuation of GH replacement. Large multicenter longitudinal studies will be necessary to determine whether the differences in LBM accrual between those continuing and those stopping GH treatment contribute to reduced physical and psychological health in adulthood and whether there is a critical duration of cessation of GH therapy after which the response to GH replacement is reduced.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations:
, Change between measures; FM, fat mass; GHD, GH deficiency; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment; IS, insulin sensitivity; ITT, insulin tolerance test; LBM, lean body mass; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; %S, percentage sensitivity.
Received September 11, 2003.
Accepted April 30, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G S Conway, M Szarras-Czapnik, K Racz, A Keller, P Chanson, M Tauber, M Zacharin, and on behalf of the 1369 GHD to GHDA Transition Study Treatment for 24 months with recombinant human GH has a beneficial effect on bone mineral density in young adults with childhood-onset GH deficiency Eur. J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2009; 160(6): 899 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Moller and J. O. L. Jorgensen Effects of Growth Hormone on Glucose, Lipid, and Protein Metabolism in Human Subjects Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2009; 30(2): 152 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Ciresi, M C Amato, A Criscimanna, A Mattina, C Vetro, A Galluzzo, G D'Acquisto, and C Giordano Metabolic parameters and adipokine profile during GH replacement therapy in children with GH deficiency Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2007; 156(3): 353 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A M Solomon and P M G Bouloux Modifying muscle mass - the endocrine perspective. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 191(2): 349 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Svensson, G. Johannsson, A. Iranmanesh, K. Albertsson-Wikland, J. D Veldhuis, and B.-A. Bengtsson GH secretory pattern in young adults who discontinued GH treatment for GH deficiency and decreased longitudinal growth in childhood. Eur. J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2006; 155(1): 91 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Woodhouse, A. Mukherjee, S. M. Shalet, and S. Ezzat The Influence of Growth Hormone Status on Physical Impairments, Functional Limitations, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults Endocr. Rev., May 1, 2006; 27(3): 287 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wei, Z. Rhani, and C. G. Goodyer Characterization of Growth Hormone Receptor Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Variants in Human Adipocytes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2006; 91(5): 1901 - 1908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Salerno, V. Esposito, V. Farina, G. Radetti, A. Umbaldo, D. Capalbo, L. Spinelli, S. Muzzica, G. Lombardi, and A. Colao Improvement of Cardiac Performance and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Children with GH Deficiency after Two Years of GH Replacement Therapy: An Observational, Open, Prospective, Case-Control Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1288 - 1295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Mauras, O. H. Pescovitz, V. Allada, M. Messig, M. P. Wajnrajch, B. Lippe, and on behalf of the Transition Study Group Limited Efficacy of Growth Hormone (GH) during Transition of GH-Deficient Patients from Adolescence to Adulthood: A Phase III Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Two-Year Trial J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 3946 - 3955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |