help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perticone, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sesti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perticone, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sesti, G.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 89, No. 7 3606-3609
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society


COMMENT

Impaired Endothelial Function in Never-Treated Hypertensive Subjects Carrying the Arg972 Polymorphism in the Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Gene

Francesco Perticone, Angela Sciacqua, Angela Scozzafava, Giorgio Ventura, Emanuela Laratta, Arturo Pujia, Massimo Federici, Renato Lauro and Giorgio Sesti

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (F.P., A.Sci., A.Sco., G.V., E.L., A.P., G.S.), "G. Salvatore" University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; and Department of Internal Medicine (M.F., R.L.), University of Rome-Tor Vergata, 00173 Rome, Italy

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Francesco Perticone, M.D., Department of Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Policlinico Mater Domini-Via Tommaso Campanella, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy. E-mail: perticone{at}unicz.it.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Some cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension and insulin resistance, are associated with endothelial dysfunction. Insulin regulates both in vitro and in vivo expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) via a pathway involving insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase. Recently, we found that human endothelial cells obtained from carriers of the Arg972 IRS-1 polymorphism exhibited reduced eNOS expression in response to chronic exposure to insulin. A reduction in eNOS expression would be expected to be associated with impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation. To investigate a possible relationship between Arg972 IRS-1 polymorphism and endothelial dysfunction in vivo, we enrolled a cohort of 100 never-treated hypertensive subjects. Endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilation were assessed by increasing doses of acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside. IRS-1 polymorphism was detected by PCR. The allelic frequency of the Arg972 IRS-1 variant was 8.0%. Stratifying subjects according to IRS-1 genotype, we observed that acetylcholine-stimulated forearm blood flow was significantly (P < 0.0001) lower in Gly/Arg heterozygous carriers than in Gly/Gly carriers (11.3 ± 4.4 vs. 14.7 ± 5.9 ml/100 ml–1 of tissue per min–1). Sodium nitroprusside caused comparable increments in forearm blood flow in both groups (12.9 ± 2.4 vs. 13.3 ± 3.5 ml/100 ml–1 of tissue per min–1). Our data strongly suggest that, by inducing endothelial dysfunction, the Arg972 IRS-1 polymorphism may contribute to the genetic predisposition to develop cardiovascular disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION IS an early event in atherogenesis that precedes the thickening of the intima and the formation of atherosclerotic plaques (1, 2). It has been reported that forearm endothelial dysfunction predicts cerebro-cardiovascular events in individuals at risk for atherosclerosis such as hypertensive patients (3). Insulin has multiple physiological effects on the vascular tissues including regulation of the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) (4, 5). These effects appear to be mediated via the activation of the signaling pathway involving the insulin receptor/insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1)/phosphatidylinositol-3 (PI-3) kinase (5). Accordingly, mice with a specific vascular endothelial cell insulin receptor knockout exhibit reduced eNOS mRNA levels in endothelial cells (6). IRS-1 knockout mice showed impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of the aorta but a normal endothelium-independent vasodilatation (7). Molecular scanning of the IRS-1 gene in normal individuals and patients with type 2 diabetes from different ethnic groups has revealed several polymorphisms resulting in amino acid substitutions (8). Of these, the Gly->Arg change at codon 972 (Arg972 IRS-1) is the most common and has been studied most extensively (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). Primary cells from subjects carrying this polymorphism and cell line transfected with the Arg972 IRS-1 variant exhibited defects in binding of the p85 subunit of PI-3 kinase to IRS-1 and IRS-1-associated PI-3 kinase activity (16, 17, 18). We have recently found that human umbilical vein endothelial cells obtained from carriers of the Arg972 IRS-1 polymorphism exhibited reduced eNOS expression in response to chronic exposure to insulin (19). An altered regulation in insulin-dependent eNOS expression in carriers of the Arg972 IRS-1 polymorphism would be expected to be associated with in vivo endothelial dysfunction. To address this issue, we studied the distribution of Arg972 variant in a population of never-treated hypertensive subjects in whom vascular function vasodilation was measured by strain-gauge plethysmography.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study population

A total of 100 hypertensive subjects, consecutively recruited from the Department of Internal Medicine of the University Hospital of Catanzaro, participated in this study. All subjects were Caucasian and underwent physical examination and review of their medical history. All participants had never been treated with antihypertensive drugs. Causes of secondary hypertension were excluded by clinical and biochemical tests. None of the patients had a history or clinical evidence of angina, myocardial infarction, valvular heart disease, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, peripheral vascular disease, coagulopathy, or any disease predisposing them to vasculitis or Raynaud’s phenomenon. All subjects were normal glucose tolerant as assessed by the oral glucose tolerance test. Insulin sensitivity was estimated by using the previously validated homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index (20), calculated from the fasting glucose and insulin concentrations according to the following formula: HOMA = [insulin (µU/ml) x glucose (mmol/liter)]/22.5. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and informed written consent was obtained from each subject in accordance with principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Blood pressure (BP) measurements

Readings of clinic BP were obtained in the left arm of the supine patients, after 5 min of quiet rest, with a mercury sphygmomanometer. A minimum of three BP readings was taken on three separate occasions at least 2 wk apart. Patients with a clinic BP ≥ 140 mm Hg systolic and/or 90 mm Hg diastolic were defined as hypertensive.

Vascular function

All studies were performed at 0900 h after subjects had fasted overnight, with the subjects lying supine in a quiet, air-conditioned room (22–24 C). The protocol that has been previously described by Panza et al. (1) and subsequently used by our group (3) was used for the present study. All patients underwent measurement of forearm blood flow (FBF) and BP during intraarterial infusion of saline, acetylcholine (ACh), and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) at increasing doses. ACh (Sigma, Milan, Italy) was diluted with saline immediately before infusion. SNP (Malesci, Florence, Italy) was diluted in 5% glucose solution immediately before each infusion and protected from light with aluminum foil. All participants rested 30 min after artery cannulation to reach a stable baseline before data collection; measurements of FBF and vascular resistance (VR), expressed in units, were repeated every 5 min until stable. Endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilation were assessed by a dose-response curve to intraarterial ACh infusions (7.5, 15, and 30 µg/ml–1·min–1, each for 5 min) and SNP infusions (0.8, 1.6, and 3.2 µg/ml–1·min–1, each for 5 min), respectively. The sequence of administration of ACh and SNP was randomized to avoid any bias related to the order of drug infusion. The drug infusion rate, adjusted for forearm volume of each subject, was 1 ml/min.

DNA analysis

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood according to standard procedures. The glycine to arginine substitution at codon 972 of the human IRS-1 sequence was detected by digestion of PCR products with restriction enzyme BstNI as previously described (21).

Statistical analysis

ANOVA was performed for clinical and biological data, and the differences between means were compared using the unpaired Student’s t test. The vasodilating responses to ACh and SNP were compared by ANOVA for repeated measurements, and when analysis was significant, the Tukey test was applied. Differences were also tested after adjusting for factors reported to impair endothelium-dependent vasodilation, such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), lipid levels, and BP values, by analysis of covariance. Parametric data are reported as mean ± SD. Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05. All comparisons were performed using the statistical package SPSS 10.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study population

In keeping with previous results observed in subjects with features of the insulin-resistance syndrome (10), the allelic frequency of the Arg972 IRS-1 variant in the study population was 8.0%. Clinical, biochemical, and hemodynamic characteristics of Gly/Gly and heterozygous carriers for the Arg972 IRS-1 variant are reported in Table 1Go. No significant differences in age, gender, BMI, heart rate (HR), systolic BP, diastolic BP, fasting glucose levels, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, microalbuminuria, and fibrinogen were observed between the heterozygous and Gly/Gly carriers. By contrast, fasting insulin levels and insulin resistance, estimated as HOMA index, were significantly higher in heterozygous carriers for the Arg972 IRS-1 variant compared with Gly/Gly carriers (P < 0.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Demographic, humoral, and hemodynamic characteristics of the study population according to IRS-1 polymorphism

 
Endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation

The baseline FBF and VR values did not differ between the heterozygous and Gly/Gly carriers (Table 1Go). Intraarterial infusion of ACh caused a significant dose-dependent increase in FBF and decrease in forearm VR in both groups of subjects. As shown in Fig. 1Go, carriers of the Arg972 IRS-1 variant exhibited a significantly lower FBF compared with Gly/Gly carriers, as estimated by either two-way ANOVA (P < 0.0004) or the area under the curve (P < 0.02). The differences in ACh-stimulated FBF remained significant (P < 0.004) after adjusting for well-known modulators of endothelium function including age, gender, BMI, serum glucose, serum cholesterol, serum triglycerides, and systolic BP. VR decreased in a dose-dependent manner in the two groups, and changes in VR mirrored the changes in FBF. The VR values at the three incremental doses of ACh were 24.1 ± 7.1, 15.9 ± 5.3, and 8.9 ± 3.5 U, and 25.4 ± 7.6, 19.3 ± 6.3, and 11.5 ± 3.8 U for Gly/Gly carriers and heterozygous carriers for the Arg972 IRS-1 variant, respectively. Changes in VR in response to ACh infusion were significantly less pronounced in carriers of the Arg972 IRS-1 variant compared with Gly/Gly carriers (P < 0.03). Intraarterial infusion of ACh caused no change in BP or HR values in both groups of patients.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Responses of FBF to intraarterial infusions of ACh and SNP in Arg972 IRS-1 polymorphism carriers and Gly/Gly carriers.

 
Increasing doses of intraarterial infusion of SNP induced a significant increase in FBF as well as a decrease in forearm VR in both groups of subjects (Fig. 1Go). However, no differences were observed between Gly/Gly carriers and heterozygous carriers of the Arg972 IRS-1 variant in SNP-induced FBF or VR changes. Intraarterial infusion of SNP caused no changes in BP or HR values in both groups of subjects.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There is evidence from cell biology and experimental research suggesting that insulin regulates expression of eNOS via a PI-3 kinase-dependent pathway (4, 5, 6, 7, 19). These observations coupled with the accessibility of a carefully characterized cohort of never-treated hypertensive subjects have provided the rationale for addressing the question of whether the Arg972 polymorphism of IRS-1 could be associated with endothelial dysfunction, an early event in the developmental process leading to atherosclerosis (3). We found that, in a population of never-treated hypertensive subjects, carriers of the Arg972 polymorphism showed an impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation compared with Gly/Gly carriers. By contrast, no significant differences in endothelium-independent vasodilatation were observed between Arg972 polymorphism carriers and Gly/Gly carriers. This is the first evidence demonstrating an association between Arg972 polymorphism and impaired vasodilator response to intraarterial infusion of ACh in human essential hypertension. Our results are consistent with those observed in IRS-1-deficient mice, which showed an impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of the aorta but a normal endothelium-independent vasodilatation (7). The functional effect of the Arg972 IRS-1 polymorphism on insulin signaling has been extensively characterized by a series of in vitro studies (16, 17, 18, 19). Thus, it has been demonstrated that the presence of the Gly->Arg change at codon 972 of IRS-1 caused a specific defect in binding of the p85 regulatory subunit of PI-3 kinase to the IRS-1 variant, resulting in a decrease in IRS-1-associated PI-3 kinase activity. A potential mechanism whereby the Arg972 polymorphism could contribute to impair endothelium-dependent vasodilatation is by affecting eNOS expression via a defective PI-3 kinase activation. Accordingly, we have recently observed that human umbilical vein endothelial cells obtained from carriers of the Arg972 polymorphism showed a reduced eNOS expression in response to chronic exposure to insulin (19). However, because insulin resistance, estimated as HOMA index, was significantly higher in hypertensive carriers for the Arg972 IRS-1 polymorphism, we cannot exclude the possibility that endothelial dysfunction observed in carriers of the Arg972 variant was secondary to metabolic abnormalities induced by whole-body insulin resistance rather than a direct effect of the IRS-1 variant on endothelial cells.

Previous studies have shown that the frequency of the Arg972 IRS-1 polymorphism was significantly higher in patients with angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease compared with control individuals (22). When adjusted for other risk factors, the relative risk of coronary artery disease associated with the Arg972 IRS-1 polymorphism was 2.93-fold higher than in Gly/Gly carriers, and it increased to 6.97-fold in obese subjects and to 27.3-fold in subjects with clinical features of insulin-resistance syndrome (22). Interestingly, obese carriers of the Arg972 IRS-1 polymorphism are characterized by decreased insulin sensitivity associated with a clustering of metabolic cardiovascular risk factors, including elevated fasting levels of plasma glucose, serum triglyceride, and plasma tissue plasminogen activator and its inhibitor, thus suggesting that the polymorphism potentiates obesity-linked insulin resistance (23). Finally, a recent genome-wide linkage analysis of the acute coronary syndrome has mapped a susceptibility locus on chromosome 2q33-q37.3, which harbors the gene encoding IRS-1 (24). Taken together, these observations strongly suggest that, by inducing endothelial dysfunction, the Arg972 IRS-1 polymorphism may contribute to the genetic predisposition to develop cardiovascular disease.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported in part by grants from European Community "EuroDiabetesGene" Grants QLG1-CT-1999-00674 (to G.S.) and PRIN-COFIN 2000 MM06A92341-002 (to F.P.).

Abbreviations: ACh, Acetylcholine; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; FBF, forearm blood flow; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment; HR, heart rate; IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate 1; PI-3, phosphatidylinositol-3; SNP, sodium nitroprusside; VR, vascular resistance.

Received December 16, 2003.

Accepted March 29, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Brush JE, Epstein SE 1990 Abnormal endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in patients with essential hypertension. N Engl J Med 223:22–27
  2. Pinkney JH, Stehouwer CD, Coppack SW, Yudkin JS 1997 Endothelial dysfunction: cause of the insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes 46(Suppl 2):S9–S13
  3. Perticone F, Ceravolo R, Pujia A, Ventura G, Iacopino S, Scozzafava A, Ferraro A, Chello M, Mastroroberto P, Verdecchia P, Schillaci G 2001 Prognostic significance of endothelium dysfunction in hypertensive patients. Circulation 104:191–196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Zeng G, Nystrom FH, Ravichandran LV, Cong LN, Kirby M, Mostowski H, Quon MJ 2000 Roles for insulin receptor, PI3-kinase, and Akt in insulin-signaling pathways related to production of nitric oxide in human vascular endothelial cells. Circulation 101:1539–1545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kuboki K, Jiang ZY, Takahara N, Ha SW, Igarashi M, Yamauchi T, Feener EP, Herbert TP, Rhodes CJ, King GL 2000 Regulation of endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase gene expression in endothelial cells and in vivo: a specific vascular action of insulin. Circulation 101:676–681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Vicent D, Ilany J, Kondo T, Naruse K, Fisher SJ, Kisanuki YY, Bursell S, Yanagisawa M, King GL, Kahn CR 2003 The role of endothelial insulin signaling in the regulation of vascular tone and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 111:1373–1380[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Abe H, Yamada N, Kamata K, Kuwaki T, Shimada M, Osuga J, Shionoiri F, Yahagi N, Kadowaki T, Tamemoto H, Ishibashi S, Yazaki Y, Makuuchi M 1998 Hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and impaired endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in mice lacking insulin-receptor substrate-1. J Clin Invest 101:1784–1788[Medline]
  8. Sesti G, Federici M, Hribal ML, Lauro D, Sbraccia P, Lauro R 2001 Defects of the insulin receptor substrate (IRS) system in human metabolic disorders. FASEB J 15:2099–2111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Almind K, Bjorbaek C, Vestergaard H, Hansen T, Echwald S, Pedersen O 1993 Amino acid polymorphism of insulin receptor substrate-1 in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Lancet 342:828–832[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Imai Y, Fusco A, Suzuki Y, Lesniak MA, D’Alfonso R, Sesti G, Bertoli A, Lauro R, Accili D, Taylor SI 1994 Variant sequences of insulin receptor substrate-1 in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:1655–1658[Abstract]
  11. Hitman GA, Hawrami K, McCarthy MI, Viswanathan M, Snehalatha C, Ramachandran A, Tuomilehto J, Tuomilehto-Wolf E, Nissinen A, Pedersen O 1995 Insulin receptor substrate-1 gene mutations in NIDDM; implications for the study of polygenic disease. Diabetologia 38:481–486[Medline]
  12. Zhang Y, Wat N, Stratton IM, Warren-Perry MG, Orho M, Groop L, Turner RC 1996 UKPDS 19: heterogeneity in NIDDM: separate contributions of IRS-1 and ß3-adrenergic-receptor mutations to insulin resistance and obesity respectively with no evidence for glycogen synthase gene mutations. Diabetologia 39:1505–1511[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Sigal RJ, Doria A, Warram JH, Krolewski AS 1996 Codon 972 polymorphism in the insulin receptor substrate-1 gene, obesity, and risk of noninsulindependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1657–1659[Abstract]
  14. Laakso M, Malkki M, Kekalainen P, Kuusisto J, Deeb SS 1994 Insulin receptor substrate-1 variants in non-insulin-dependent diabetes. J Clin Invest 94:1141–1146
  15. Grant PJ, Stickland MH, Mansfield MW 1995 Insulin receptor substrate-1 gene and cardiovascular risk factors in NIDDM. Lancet 346:841–842
  16. Almind K, Inoue G, Pedersen O, Kahn CR 1996 A common amino acid polymorphism in insulin receptor substrate-1 causes impaired insulin signaling. J Clin Invest 97:2569–2575[Medline]
  17. Hribal ML, Federici M, Porzio O, Lauro D, Borboni P, Accili D, Lauro R, Sesti G 2000 The Gly->Arg972 amino acid polymorphism in insulin receptor substrate-1 affects glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2004–2013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Federici M, Hribal ML, Ranalli M, Marselli L, Porzio O, Lauro D, Borboni P, Lauro R, Marchetti P, Melino G, Sesti G 2001 The common Arg972 polymorphism in insulin receptor substrate-1 causes apoptosis of human pancreatic islets. FASEB J 15:22–24[Free Full Text]
  19. Federici M, Pandolfi A, De Filippis EA, Pellegrini G, Menghini R, Lauro D, Cardellini M, Romano M, Sesti G, Lauro R, Consoli A 2004 G972R IRS-1 variant impairs insulin regulation of eNOS in cultured human endothelial cells. Circulation 109:300–405[Free Full Text]
  20. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner R 1985 Homeostatic model assessment: insulin resistance and ß-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28:412–419[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Federici M, Petrone A, Porzio O, Bizzarri C, Lauro D, D’Alfonso R, Patera I, Cappa M, Nistico L, Baroni M, Sesti G, di Mario U, Lauro R, Buzzetti R 2003 The Gly972->Arg IRS-1 variant is associated with type 1 diabetes in Continental Italy. Diabetes 52:887–890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Baroni MG, D’Andrea MP, Montali A, Pannitteri G, Barilla F, Campagna F, Mazzei E, Lovari S, Seccareccia F, Campa PP, Ricci G, Pozzilli P, Urbinati G, Arca M 1999 A common mutation of the insulin receptor substrate-1 gene is a risk factor for coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19:2975–2980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Clausen JO, Hansen T, Bjorbaek C, Echwald SM, Urhammer SA, Rasmussen S, Andersen CB, Hansen L, Almind K, Winther K 1995 Insulin resistance: interaction between obesity and a common variant of insulin receptor substrate-1. Lancet 346:397–402[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Harrap SB, Zammit KS, Wong ZY, Williams FM, Bahlo M, Tonkin AM, Anderson ST 2002 Genome-wide linkage analysis of the acute coronary syndrome suggests a locus on chromosome 2. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22:874–878



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
F. Andreozzi, G. Formoso, S. Prudente, M. L. Hribal, A. Pandolfi, E. Bellacchio, S. Di Silvestre, V. Trischitta, A. Consoli, and G. Sesti
TRIB3 R84 Variant Is Associated With Impaired Insulin-Mediated Nitric Oxide Production in Human Endothelial Cells
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2008; 28(7): 1355 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. Muniyappa, M. Montagnani, K. K. Koh, and M. J. Quon
Cardiovascular Actions of Insulin
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2007; 28(5): 463 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. J. McGettrick, E. P. Feener, and C. R. Kahn
Human Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 (IRS-1) Polymorphism G972R Causes IRS-1 to Associate with the Insulin Receptor and Inhibit Receptor Autophosphorylation
J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2005; 280(8): 6441 - 6446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perticone, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sesti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perticone, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sesti, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals