| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cedars Sinai Research Institute (R.D.M., K.K., S.-G.R., S.M.), University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90048; and Novartis Pharma AG (I.L., G.W., C.B.), CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Shlomo Melmed, M.D., Room 2015, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90048. E-mail: melmed{at}csmc.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit secretion from nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas by 46 ± 18% (P = 0.34). In contrast, octreotide inhibited GH, PRL, and
-subunit from the respective adenoma by 18 ± 12 (P = 0.39), 22 ± 4 (P = 0.04), and 20 ± 10% (P = 0.34). In all culture systems, no significant difference in the inhibitory action of SOM230, octreotide, and somatostatin 14 on hormone release was observed. SOM230, similar to somatostatin, has high-affinity binding to SSTR1, 2, 3, and 5 and, in keeping with this, has an equivalent inhibitory effect on pituitary hormone secretion. As a consequence of its broader binding profile, SOM230 is likely to find clinical utility in treating tumors resistant to SSTR-2-preferential analogs. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SOM230 and octreotide were kindly supplied by Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Switzerland). SRIF14 and SRIF28 were purchased from Phoenix Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Belmont, CA).
Cell culture and treatments
Primary cell cultures were derived from pituitaries of male Sprague Dawley rats, 18- to 24-wk terminated human fetuses, and pituitary adenomas by mechanical and enzymatic dispersement. Cells were resuspended in low-glucose DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics in 48-well plates and incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 C for 48 h. Cells were washed in serum-free media for 4 h and then incubated in media containing SOM230, octreotide, SRIF14, SRIF28, or vehicle. Media were collected for measurement of hormone levels. Use of human tissue was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and patients gave written consent for anonymous collection. Animal procedures were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines for animal care.
RNA isolation and RT-PCR
Tissue was homogenized in TRIZOL (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and phase separated with chloroform. RNA was precipitated from the aqueous phase, washed in 75% ethanol, and redissolved in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water. Three micrograms RNA were incubated with RNase-free deoxyribonuclease-I (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) to eliminate contaminating genomic DNA. For synthesis of first-strand cDNA, RNA was reverse transcribed by incubation with Oligo(dT) primers and Omniscript reverse transcriptase (RT+) (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). A negative control was performed by running the reaction in the absence of RT enzyme (RT). Fidelity of the RT reaction was assessed by PCR using primers for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Thirty-five cycles of PCR for each of the five SSTR subtypes were performed using Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and primers specific for the rat SSTR subtypes. Identical negative control reactions were performed on the RT sample. Positive control reactions were performed using plasmids containing the appropriate full-length SSTR as a template.
Assays
Human GH was measured in duplicate using a RIA kit [Diagnostic Products Corp. (DPC), Los Angeles, CA]. Human prolactin (PRL) and TSH were measured by immunoradiometric assay (Coat-a-Count, DPC). Rat GH, PRL, TSH, LH, and human
-subunit were measured in duplicate by double-antibody RIA using materials supplied by Dr. A. F. Parlow (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Hormone Distribution Program, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA).
Data analysis
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Differences between control and treatment groups were analyzed using the t test and rank sum test for parametric and nonparametric data, respectively. ANOVA was performed to assess differences across treatment groups.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cultures were incubated with 0.01100 nM SOM230 or octreotide for 6 h. SOM230 and octreotide inhibited GH secretion in a dose-dependent manner (ANOVA on ranks; P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively, Fig. 1
, A and B). Maximal GH inhibition was observed between 10 and 100 nM for both ligands. Calculated IC50 values for SOM230 and octreotide were 1.2 and 0.8 nM, respectively. Further cultures were incubated with 10 nM SOM230 for 372 h. Significant GH inhibition was observed at 6 h (37 ± 9%, P = 0.03), with maximum inhibition occurring after 20 h incubation (56 ± 6%, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1C
).
|
|
GH secretion from fetal pituitary cultures was suppressed by 26 ± 12 (P = 0.08), 48 ± 7 (P < 0.001), 45 ± 25 (P = 0.001), and 42 ± 9% (P = 0.002) by 20 h incubation with 10 nM SRIF14, SRIF28, octreotide, and SOM230, respectively. No difference between treatment types was observed for GH inhibition (ANOVA, P = 0.41). TSH secretion was not suppressed significantly.
Pituitary adenomas
Seventeen pituitary adenomas (six GH-secreting, two PRL-secreting, and nine clinically nonfunctioning adenoma) were obtained immediately after transsphenoidal surgery. The tumor type was confirmed by immunohistochemistry for GH, PRL, and
-subunit. Primary cultures were incubated with 10 nM SRIF14, SRIF 28, octreotide, and SOM230 for 20 h and media collected and assayed for the respective hormone secretion.
In five of the six GH-secreting adenomas (tumors 16), SRIF14 and SOM230 inhibited GH by more than 20%, whereas octreotide and SRIF28 inhibited GH by more than 20% from only three and two tumors, respectively. Mean GH inhibition observed with SRIF14, SRIF28 octreotide, and SOM230 was 29 (P = 0.002), 17 (P = 0.13), 18 (P = 0.39), and 34% (P = 0.002), respectively (Fig. 3
). No difference in GH suppression was observed between treatments. SSTR subtype expression assessed by PCR revealed all tumors to express SSTR2, and with the exception of tumors 5 and 6, all tumors expressed SSTR5. Four of the tumors expressed SSTR1 (tumors 1, 2, 4, and 6), whereas only tumor 2 also expressed SSTR3.
|
|
-subunit levels were below the limit of detection in the medium of one adenoma. Additionally, four adenomas were unresponsive to treatments; however, in these four tumors, media levels of
-subunit were at the limit of detection of the assay. In the remaining four tumors (tumors 912, Fig. 5
-subunit by a mean of 32 (P = 0.02), 20 (P = 0.34), and 46% (P = 0.34), respectively, and no difference between treatments was observed. RT-PCR analysis of SSTR subtypes revealed all four nonfunctioning adenomas to express SSTR2, whereas tumors 8 and 10 also expressed SSTR3 mRNA.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SRIF14 provides the benchmark to which new SRIF analogs are compared with respect to binding affinity and biological efficacy. In contrast, octreotide provides a paradigm that new SRIF analogs need to surpass to be considered clinically advantageous and thus worthy of further development. In the current study, the relative efficacy of SRIF14, SRIF28, octreotide, and SOM230 on hormone secretion were studied in three in vitro culture systems: primary rat pituicytes, human fetal pituitary cell, and pituitary adenomas. Because SOM230 binds to SSTR1, 2, 3, and 5 with IC50 values in the nanomolar range and SSTR4 is not expressed or expressed at very low levels in the pituitary and pituitary adenoma, SOM230 would be predicted to show similar efficacy to SRIF. Also, as a consequence of synergy between ligand bound SSTR subtypes, SOM230 would also be expected to show improved efficacy, compared with octreotide.
SOM230 effectively suppressed GH release from rat and human fetal pituitary cells in culture as well as from cultured GH-secreting adenomas. In the rat pituicyte cultures, SOM230 showed peak inhibition of GH at 20 h, with fall-off in inhibition thereafter, likely representing continued GH release in the setting of reduced bioactivity of SOM230. SOM230 demonstrated a similar mean GH inhibition to SRIF14 and octreotide in all cultures studied. However, a trend toward greater efficacy of SOM230 in GH-secreting adenoma, compared with octreotide, is reflected by significant inhibition of GH release, compared with control, by SOM230 but not octreotide. The relatively greater efficacy of octreotide in the rat pituitary cultures may be explained by the finding that octreotide has 160-fold greater affinity for the rat SSTR5 receptor, compared with the human SSTR5 (IC50 0.2 vs. 32 nM) (1, 11). Although no significant difference between SRIF14 and SRIF 28 was observed in the culture systems, the mean GH inhibition in the GH-secreting adenomas suggests the possibility of differences between the two circulating forms. Mean GH inhibition by SRIF28 was, however, artificially reduced by tumor 6, which showed a paradoxical increase in GH secretion. In GH-secreting adenomas, inhibition of hormone release is primarily regulated via SSTR2 and 5, and the majority of GH adenomas express both these receptor subtypes (4, 12, 13, 14). Recent evidence suggests an additional regulatory role for SSTR1 (15). Currently available SRIF analogs, including octreotide, preferentially bind SSTR2 (2, 3) and therefore effectively suppress GH secretion in most patients with acromegaly. GH inhibition from GH-secreting adenomas correlates with quantitative expression of SSTR2 but not SSTR5 (4, 6). GH-secreting adenomas resistant to clinically available analogs express low densities of SSTR2 but frequently express high levels of SSTR5 (6). The high affinity of SOM230 for both SSTR5 and SSTR1 may in theory lead to an important clinical role for this analog in managing patients with GH-secreting adenomas resistant to current therapy. Even in GH adenomas considered responsive, SOM230 may improve efficacy as a result of high-affinity binding to, and functional synergy between, SSTR2 and SSTR5 (16). It is unlikely that tumors studied here were octreotide resistant because all expressed SSTR2.
Due to high-affinity binding to four of the five SSTRs, SOM230 may prove beneficial in treatment of other classes of pituitary adenoma. In contrast to observations in rat pituicytes, SOM230 suppressed PRL secretion from PRL-secreting adenomas to a similar extent as SRIF14. Octreotide was less effective in inhibiting PRL. Prolactinomas express a variable combination of SSTR1, 2, and 5; regulation of PRL release occurring via SSTR5 (7, 17) and possibly SSTR1 (15). SOM230 through its ability to bind both SSTR1 and 5 with high affinity may prove a useful adjunct for treating prolactinomas (approximately 25%) nonresponsive to dopamine agonists.
Rat LH secretion was not inhibited by any of the treatments, consistent with the fact that SRIF does not appear to normally control gonadotropin secretion, although it may modulate
-subunit when cosecreted by GH-, TSH-, or glycoprotein-secreting adenoma. In the glycoprotein-secreting adenoma studied, SOM230 demonstrated a trend toward greater suppression of
-subunit, compared with octreotide. Clinically nonfunctioning adenomas most frequently express SSTR2 and 3 (12, 13, 18), and although effects of SRIF analogs on inhibition of glycoprotein hormone secretion do not correlate with tumor growth, the high-affinity binding of SOM230 for SSTR3 may optimize antiproliferative effects via induction of apoptosis that occurs primarily through this receptor subtype.
In summary, SOM230 is a novel SRIF analog designed with the intent of achieving high-affinity binding to all SSTR subtypes as observed for SRIF14. This approach aims to optimize the synergistic effect of SSTR subtype interactions, thereby enhancing GH inhibition and the number of GH-secreting adenomas responsive to treatment. As demonstrated in this study, SOM230 induces similar inhibition of GH, PRL, TSH, and
-subunit as SRIF14 and octreotide. Although SOM230 does not enhance in vitro GH suppression over octreotide in most tumors, patients with acromegaly, select cohorts of octreotide-resistant GH-secreting adenomas, and non-GH adenomas that do not express SSTR2 are candidates for SOM230 treatment evaluation.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: PRL, Prolactin; RT, reverse transcriptase; SRIF, somatostatin; SSTR, somatostatin receptor.
Received July 30, 2003.
Accepted March 10, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Lesche, D. Lehmann, F. Nagel, H. A. Schmid, and S. Schulz Differential Effects of Octreotide and Pasireotide on Somatostatin Receptor Internalization and Trafficking in Vitro J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2009; 94(2): 654 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Boscaro, W. H. Ludlam, B. Atkinson, J. E. Glusman, S. Petersenn, M. Reincke, P. Snyder, A. Tabarin, B. M. K. Biller, J. Findling, et al. Treatment of Pituitary-Dependent Cushing's Disease with the Multireceptor Ligand Somatostatin Analog Pasireotide (SOM230): A Multicenter, Phase II Trial J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2009; 94(1): 115 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fedele, I. De Martino, R. Pivonello, A. Ciarmiello, M. L. Del Basso De Caro, R. Visone, D. Palmieri, G. M. Pierantoni, C. Arra, H. A. Schmid, et al. SOM230, A New Somatostatin Analogue, Is Highly Effective in the Therapy of Growth Hormone/Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2007; 13(9): 2738 - 2744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. van der Hoek, S. W J Lamberts, and L. J Hofland Preclinical and clinical experiences with the role of somatostatin receptors in the treatment of pituitary adenomas Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 156(suppl_1): S45 - S51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Susini and L Buscail Rationale for the use of somatostatin analogs as antitumor agents Ann. Onc., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 1733 - 1742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Hubina, A. M Nanzer, M. R Hanson, E. Ciccarelli, M. Losa, D. Gaia, M. Papotti, M. R. Terreni, S. Khalaf, S. Jordan, et al. Somatostatin analogues stimulate p27 expression and inhibit the MAP kinase pathway in pituitary tumours. Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 155(2): 371 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Gillam, M. E. Molitch, G. Lombardi, and A. Colao Advances in the Treatment of Prolactinomas Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2006; 27(5): 485 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |