help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pivonello, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lamberts, S. W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pivonello, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lamberts, S. W. J.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 89, No. 5 2452-2462
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

Dopamine Receptor Expression and Function in Corticotroph Pituitary Tumors

Rosario Pivonello, Diego Ferone, Wouter W. de Herder, Johan M. Kros, Maria Laura Del Basso De Caro, Marica Arvigo, Lucio Annunziato, Gaetano Lombardi, Annamaria Colao, Leo J. Hofland and Steven W. J. Lamberts

Departments of Internal Medicine (R.P., D.F., W.W.d.H., L.J.H., S.W.J.L.) and Pathology (J.M.K.), Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Departments of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology (R.P., A.C., G.L.), Pathology (M.L.D.B.D.C.), and Neuroscience, Division of Pharmacology (R.P., L.A.), Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; and Department of Endocrinological and Metabolic Sciences and Centre for Excellence for Biological Research (D.F., M.A.), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Rosario Pivonello, M.D., Department of Molecular and Clinical, Endocrinology and Oncology, Federico II University, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy. E-mail: rpivone{at}tin.it.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The role of dopamine agonist treatment in corticotroph pituitary tumors is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate D2 receptor expression in 20 corticotroph pituitary tumors and to correlate it to the in vitro effect of dopamine agonists on ACTH secretion and the in vivo effect of short-term cabergoline treatment on cortisol secretion. D2 expression was evaluated by receptor-ligand binding, immunohistochemistry, and RT-PCR. A 50% or more decrease in daily urinary cortisol levels was considered a significant clinical response. At receptor-ligand binding, specific binding of [125I]epidepride was found in 80% of cases. At immunohistochemistry, specific D2 immunostaining was found in 75% of cases. D2 expression was found in 83.3% of cases (D2long in 40%, D2short in 20%, and both in 40%) by RT-PCR. Significant in vitro inhibition of ACTH secretion was found in 100% of D2-positive cases, but not in 100% of D2-negative cases by either bromocriptine or cabergoline. A significant in vivo inhibition of cortisol secretion after 3-month cabergoline treatment was found in 60%, although a normalization of cortisol secretion was found in 40% of cases. All cabergoline-responsive cases were associated with D2 expression, whereas all noncabergoline-responsive cases but one were not associated with D2 expression. In conclusion, functional D2 receptors were expressed in approximately 80% of corticotroph pituitary tumors. The effectiveness of cabergoline in normalizing cortisol secretion in 40% of cases supports its therapeutic use in the management of Cushing’s disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DOPAMINE IS THE predominant catecholamine neurotransmitter in the human central nervous system where it controls a variety of functions, including cognition, emotion, locomotor activity, and regulation of the endocrine system (1). Dopamine also plays multiple roles in the periphery as a modulator of cardiovascular and renal function, gastrointestinal motility, and hormone synthesis and secretion (1). The various actions of dopamine are mediated by five specific receptors (D1–D5), which can be subdivided into two different receptor families on the basis of their biochemical and pharmacological characteristics: D1-like, including D1 and D5, and D2-like, including D2, D3, and D4 receptors (1). The different dopamine receptor (DR) subtypes have different distributions and play different roles in the various organs and tissues (1).

D2 receptor is expressed in the anterior and intermediate lobes of the pituitary gland (2, 3), where it mediates the tonic inhibitory control of hypothalamic dopamine on prolactin (PRL) and MSH secretion, respectively (4, 5, 6). The presence of a functional D2 receptor on tumor PRL-secreting cells (7, 8, 9, 10) led to a major therapeutic application in the treatment of PRL-secreting pituitary tumors. Indeed, medical therapy with dopamine agonists represents the first choice treatment of this type of pituitary tumors, being effective in suppressing PRL secretion and inducing tumor shrinkage (11, 12, 13). Moreover, among the different dopamine agonists, the more recently developed drug, cabergoline, has been demonstrated to be more effective than the most widely used drug, bromocriptine, in the treatment of PRL-secreting pituitary tumors (14, 15).

Treatment with bromocriptine has been also investigated in ACTH-secreting or corticotroph pituitary tumors, although with controversial results (12, 16). However, no study has ever evaluated DR expression and the effect of cabergoline treatment in controlling the ACTH and cortisol hypersecretion associated with corticotroph pituitary tumors.

The current study was designed with a 2-fold purpose: 1) to evaluate DR expression in corticotroph pituitary tumors by different techniques, namely receptor-ligand binding (R-LB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and RT-PCR; and 2) to correlate DR expression to the in vitro effect of dopamine agonists on ACTH secretion in cultured tumor corticotroph pituitary cells and to the in vivo effect of cabergoline treatment on ACTH and cortisol secretion in patients with Cushing’s disease (CD), characterized by excessive endogenous ACTH and cortisol secretion induced by a corticotroph pituitary tumor (17).


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

Twenty patients (16 women and 4 men, 25–60 yr of age) with a diagnosis of CD entered the study after their informed consent had been obtained. Ten patients were admitted to Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center (Rotterdam, The Netherlands; group 1), and 10 were admitted to Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, Federico II University (Naples, Italy; group 2) over a period of 2 yr. The patients of group 1 were retrospectively selected on the basis of the availability of a tumor specimen collected and frozen at the time of neurosurgery; the patients of group 2 were selected on the basis of the presence of persistent or recurrent disease after neurosurgery for inclusion in a prospective study. The diagnosis of CD was based on 1) increase in daily urinary cortisol excretion with inappropriately high plasma ACTH concentrations; 2) increase in basal serum cortisol concentrations with lack of the physiological circadian rhythm; 3) failure of urinary and serum cortisol suppression after low dose, but greater than 50% decrease after high dose oral dexamethasone suppression test or a decrease in serum cortisol of at least 7 µg/dl in the 7-h continuous iv dexamethasone suppression test (18, 19, 20). The diagnosis of CD was supported by the evidence of a pituitary tumor at magnetic resonance imaging of pituitary gland or at bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (20, 21). Indeed, five of the 20 patients had pituitary macroadenoma, 10 had microadenoma, and the remaining five patients had normal pituitaries; the pituitary source of ACTH hypersecretion in these five patients was confirmed by bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling. All patients were subjected to neurosurgical operation by the transsphenoidal approach for the removal of the pituitary tumor. The histological and immunohistochemical study of the tumor removed by neurosurgery documented a corticotroph pituitary lesion (adenoma or hyperplasia) in all cases, definitely confirming the diagnosis of CD in the totality of patients. After neurosurgery, clinical, hormonal, and radiological remission of CD was documented in 12 patients, whereas disease persisted in the remaining eight patients. Moreover, disease recurrence occurred in six of the 12 remitted patients in the study 1–3 yr after neurosurgery. The patients’ profiles are shown in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Patients’ clinical profile at the diagnosis of CD

 
Samples

Pituitary tumor specimens were obtained at the time of tumor excision by neurosurgery. Samples of these specimens were taken fresh directly at the operation. They were fixed in 10% paraformaldehyde overnight and embedded in paraffin for the IHC study and/or quickly frozen on dry ice and stored in a freezer at –80 C for R-LB and/or RT-PCR studies. In selected cases, a sample was also used for the establishment of a pituitary tumor primary culture. The study included only samples in which the tumor tissue represented at least 90% of the section at the histological evaluation to exclude the influence of normal pituitary tissue on the results of the studies.

Study design

The study protocol was diversified in the two different groups of patients. In group 1, D2 receptor expression was evaluated by R-LB and IHC studies. DR subtype expression was evaluated by RT-PCR in five of 10 cases. In group 2, D2 receptor expression evaluated by IHC was correlated to the in vitro effect of dopamine agonists (bromocriptine and cabergoline) on ACTH secretion and to the in vivo effect of 3-month cabergoline treatment on cortisol secretion. DR subtype expression was evaluated by RT-PCR in seven of 10 cases and also correlated to the results of the in vitro and in vivo functional studies. The protocol was in accordance with the Helsinki Doctrine on Human Experimentation, and it was approved by the local Ethics Committees.

R-LB

The R-LB study was performed on tissue samples as previously reported (22). The frozen tissue samples were cut in 10-µm-thick sections. These sections were mounted onto precleaned, gelatin-coated microscope glass slides and stored in a freezer at –80 C for at least 3 d before the experiment to improve adhesion of the tissue to the slide. The D2 analog [125I]epidepride (Radiopharmaka, Seibersdorf, Austria) was used as radioligand. The sections were preincubated at room temperature for 10 min in binding buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.7), 120 mM NaCl, 5 mm KCl, 2 mM CaCl2 2H2O, 1 mM MgCl2 6H2O, and 0.1% ascorbic acid]. Thereafter, they were incubated for 60 min at room temperature in binding buffer with [125I]epidepride. Nonspecific binding was determined in a sequential section in the presence of excess unlabeled cabergoline (1 µM). A sample was considered positive for [125I]epidepride binding when the signal was displaced by more than 50%. The incubated sections were washed twice for 5 min each time in binding buffer. After a short wash in distilled water to remove salts, the sections were air-dried and exposed to Kodak Biomax film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) or HyperFilm-3H (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Houten, The Netherlands) for 7–15 and 30–60 d, respectively, in x-ray cassettes. Histological evaluation was performed on hematoxylin-eosin-stained sequential cryostat sections. In addition, a positive control, represented by a sample of rat brain cut at the level of the basal ganglia, and negative controls, represented by rat tissues known to have no expression of DRs, were used in each experiment. The binding signals obtained were analyzed densitometrically using a computer-assisted image-processing system and were quantified by calculating the ratios between the regions of interest delineated on the total (T) and nonspecific (NS) binding sections. Using the T/NS ratios, the amount of binding in every section was graded as negative (–), for T/NS ranging from 0–1.9, moderately positive (+) for T/NS ranging from 2–3, and strongly positive (2+) for T/NS greater than 3.

IHC

The IHC study was performed on tissue samples according to a previous report (23). The formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples were cut into 5-µm-thick sections. These sections were deparaffinized, dehydrated, exposed to microwave heating in citric acid buffer at 100 C for 15 min, rinsed in tap water, followed by PBS, and subsequently incubated for 15 min in normal goat serum (1:10 dilution in PBS and 5% BSA). The sections were then incubated overnight at 4 C with rabbit antihuman D2 receptor polyclonal antibody (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) in a dilution of 1:500. A standard streptavidin-biotinylated alkaline phosphatase or -peroxidase complex (ABC kit, Biogenix, San Ramon, CA) was used to visualize the bound antibodies. Negative controls for the IHC included 1) omission of the primary antibody; and 2) preabsorption of the antibodies with the respective immunizing receptor peptides (at a concentration of 100 nm), both performed in sequential sections. Immunostaining for ACTH and PRL as well as GH, TSH, FSH, and LH was also performed on sequential sections using specific antibodies at the standard dilution. Histological evaluation was performed on hematoxylin-eosin-stained sequential sections. Positive and negative controls were represented by D2 receptor immunostaining on sections of dopamine agonist-sensitive and -resistant, PRL-secreting pituitary tumors, respectively and were carried out in the same experiments of the corticotroph pituitary tumors. The specificity of the D2 receptor antibody was tested by immunoblotting using a corticotroph pituitary tumor sample.

Immunoblotting

The immunoblotting was performed on tissue samples according to a previous report (24). Membranes were extracted from a frozen tissue sample. The tissue sample was suspended in an ice-cold Tris-buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5 mM EDTA, 3 mM EGTA, 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml soybean-trypsin-inhibitor, and 50 µg/ml bacitracin], homogenized with a Polytron homogenizer at 900 rpm for 10 strokes, and then ultracentrifuged for 1 h at 4 C at 100,000 x g. Membrane pellet was solubilized in a lysis buffer [20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 5 mM EDTA, 3 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, and 4 mg/ml dodecyl-B-D-maltoside] for 1 h at 4 C and then ultracentrifuged at 100,000 x g for 1 h at 4 C. Glycosylated proteins were purified from the membrane pellet obtained after high speed centrifugation, by wheat-germ agglutinin (WGA) affinity chromatography: the pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer and cycled twice over a 0.5-ml WGA (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) column equilibrated with lysis buffer. The column was washed and eluted with lysis buffer containing 3 mM N,N',N''triacetyl-chitotriose (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO). The protein-containing fractions were determined with the Bradford assay standardized with BSA, pooled, and stored at –80 C. Starting material and WGA-purified membranes proteins were denatured and fractionated under reducing conditions on 12.5% SDS-PAGE, then transferred electrophoretically to Hybond C-Extra nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Oakville, Canada). After transfer, nonspecific binding sites were blocked by Tris-buffered saline-Tween (TBS-T) containing 5% nonfat dried milk. After five washes with TBS-T, membranes were incubated for 16 h at 4 C with a 1:500 dilution of rabbit antihuman D2 receptor polyclonal antibody (Chemicon International) in TBS-T containing 1% BSA. Membranes were washed five times with TBS-T, then incubated for 1 h at 22 C with 1:1000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-linked antirabbit IgG (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and again washed. The specificity of the antibody was confirmed by preincubating the antibody with the respective immunizing receptor peptide (at a concentration of 100 nM). Immunoreactive bands were detected by the chemiluminescence detection system (ECL Western blot analysis system, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK). The immunoreactive bands were visualized by autoradiography after 0.5-min exposure to Biomax film (Eastman Kodak Co.). As the antibody recognizes both the native and the denatured forms of D2 receptor, bands of 110, 68, and 47 kDa could be visualized by Western blot. The expected band with the procedure used in our laboratory was the 68-kDa denatured form.

RT-PCR

mRNA isolation and cDNA synthesis were carried out according to a previous report (22). mRNA was isolated using Dynabeads oligo(deoxythymidine)25 [oligo(dT)25; Dynal AS, Oslo, Norway] from a frozen tissue sample. The cells were lysed for 2 min in ice-cold Tris buffer [100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 500 mM LiCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1% lithium dodecyl sulfate (LiDS), 5 mM dithiothreitol, and 5 U/100 µl ribonuclease inhibitor (HT Biotechnology Ltd., Cambridge, UK)]. The mixture was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 1 min to remove cell debris. After adding 100 µl prewashed Dynabeads oligo(dT)25 to the supernatant, the mixture was incubated for 5 min on ice. Thereafter, the beads were collected with a magnet and washed three times with Tris buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 0.15 M LiCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1% LiDS] and once with a similar buffer from which LiDS was omitted. mRNA was eluted from the beads in 50 ml of a 2 mM EDTA solution (pH 8) during 2 min at 65 C. To avoid contamination by genomic DNA, the isolated polyadenylated [poly(A)+] mRNA was subjected to a second purification by capturing the RNA on a fresh aliquot of prewashed Dynabeads oligo(dT)25 and washing the captured RNA as described above. cDNA was synthesized using the poly(A)+ mRNA captured on the Dynabeads oligo(dT)25 in Tris buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 100 mM KCl, 4 mM dithiothreitol, and 10 mM MgCl2] together with 1 mM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 10 U ribonuclease inhibitor, and 2 U avian myeloblastosis virus Super Reverse Transcriptase (HT Biotechnology Ltd.) in a final volume of 20 µl. This mixture was incubated for 1 h at 42 C. One tenth from each cDNA library immobilized on the paramagnetic beads was used for each amplification. The amplification reaction mixture contained cDNA template, 0.5 U SuperTaq (HT Biotechnology Ltd.), 50 µM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate (HT Biotechnology Ltd.), 5 pmol of each of a pair of oligonucleotide primers specific for human D1–D5 receptor subtypes or the hypoxanthine ribosyl transferase (HPRT) in Tris buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9), 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.01% (wt/vol) gelatin, and 0.1% Triton X-100 in a final volume of 50 µl]. The sequences of the primers for D1–D5 and HPRT are listed in Table 2Go. The PCR reaction was carried out in a DNA thermal cycler (PerkinElmer/Cetus, Gouda, The Netherlands). After an initial denaturation at 94 C for 5 min, the samples were subjected to 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 C for 1 min, annealing for 2 min at 60 C, and extension for 1 min at 72 C. After a final extension for 10 min at 72 C, 10-µl aliquots of the resulting PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. Several controls were included in the RT-PCR experiments. To ascertain that no detectable genomic DNA was present in the poly(A)+ mRNA preparation for two DR subtypes, D1 and D5, whose genes are intron-less, the cDNA reactions were also performed without reverse transcriptase and amplified with each primer pair. Amplification of the cDNA samples with the HPRT-specific primers served as a positive control for the quality of cDNA. To exclude contamination of the PCR reaction mixtures, the reactions were also performed in the absence of DNA template in parallel with cDNA samples. As a positive control for the PCR reactions of the DR subtypes and HPRT, 0.01 µg human brain cDNA was amplified in parallel with the cDNA samples of each examined pituitary corticotroph tumor.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Specific oligonucleotide primers for DR subtypes (D1–D5) and controls used in the RT-PCR study

 
In vitro functional study

The cell culture was performed according to a previous report (25). Tumor tissue samples were placed in HBSS (Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, UK), supplemented with 5% human serum albumin (Cealb, CLB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), penicillin (105 U/liter), and fungizone (0.5 mg/liter). After careful removal of blood clots, the samples were minced and washed several times with the HBSS and human serum albumin. The minced tissues were enzymatically dissociated with dispase (1000 U/liter) for 1–2 h at 37 C. After removal of erythrocytes by centrifugation on a Ficoll gradient, the tumor pituitary cells were plated in 24-well plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA) in 1 ml DMEM (Life Technologies, Inc.) culture medium containing 10% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum and penicillin/streptomycin and were incubated at 37 C in a humid CO2 incubator for 24–48 h to allow them to attach at the bottom of the plate wells. Then, medium was removed and replaced with 1 ml fresh DMEM culture medium, test substances were added, and cells were reincubated at 37 C for 72 h. Afterward, medium was collected and stored at –20 C for the measurement of ACTH secretion. In all experiments, bromocriptine and cabergoline were used as test substances and were added to the cell cultures at concentrations of 0, 10–12, 10–10, 10–9, 10–8, and 10–6 M. In two cases (no. 5 and 8), the specificity of the drug effect was tested coincubating the D2 agonist with an excess (10 µM) of the D2 antagonist sulpiride.

In vivo functional study

The patients were treated with cabergoline. Cabergoline was administered at an initial dose of 1 mg/wk with a monthly increase of 1 mg/wk until normalization of daily urinary cortisol excretion. Plasma ACTH and serum and urinary cortisol levels after 3 months of treatment were compared with the baseline hormonal values. The mean of three different measurements of these hormones on 3 nonconsecutive d of the same week were considered for the baseline and posttreatment evaluations. During cabergoline treatment, blood and urinary samples were collected on the days when the patients did not take the drug. A 50% or greater decrease in daily urinary cortisol excretion was considered a significant clinical response to cabergoline. Moreover, patients who achieved a 50% or greater decrease with normalization of urinary cortisol levels were considered full responders, whereas those who achieved a 50% or greater decrease without normalization of urinary cortisol levels were considered partial responders to cabergoline. Patients who achieved less than a 50% decrease in urinary cortisol levels were considered resistant to cabergoline treatment. After 3 months of treatment, two patients were taking 1 mg, three were taking 2 mg, and the remaining five were taking 3 mg/wk cabergoline.

Hormonal assays

ACTH levels were measured by immunoradiometric assay using a commercially available kit. Serum and urinary cortisol levels were measured by radioimmunological assay, using commercially available kits.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± SE. The comparison between post- and pretreatment hormone values was made using ANOVA, followed by Newman-Keuls test. The association between parameters was calculated by {chi}2 test. Significance was set at 5%.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Histological evaluation and IHC for pituitary hormones

Basophilic adenoma was documented in 12 (60%), basophilic hyperplasia in three (15%), chromofobe adenoma in four (20%), and acidophilic adenoma in one (5%) case. Positive immunostaining for ACTH was documented in all 20 cases (100%) in correspondence with the adenomatous or hyperplasic tissue. Conversely, positive immunostaining for PRL was documented in 13 (65%) cases. However, PRL immunostaining was positive in scattered normal cells (acidophilic ACTH-negative cells) within the tumor tissue in six (30%), in defined areas of normal cells within or around the tumor tissue in four (20%), and in defined areas of tumor tissue (basophilic ACTH-positive cells) in two (10%) cases. The remaining case was characterized by diffuse PRL immunostaining covering all acidophilic ACTH-positive tumor tissues. This case was diagnosed as a mixed ACTH/PRL-secreting pituitary tumor. No significant immunoreactivity was found for GH, TSH, FSH, and LH in all cases; this was only represented by scattered cells around the tumor tissue, probably belonging to contaminating normal pituitary. The histological and immunohistochemical features for pituitary hormones of the tumor samples are listed in Tables 3Go and 4Go for groups 1 and 2, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. DR expression in corticotroph pituitary tumors of patients of group 1

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. DR expression in corticotroph pituitary tumors of patients of group 2

 
R-LB study

Specific binding of [123I]epidepride was found at autoradiography in eight of 10 (80%) cases in group 1. It was localized in tumor cells and in normal scattered cells or defined areas around tumor tissue or within normal pituitary. The binding was homogeneously distributed in four (50%) and not homogeneously distributed within the tumor tissue in the remaining four (50%) cases. It was scored as moderately positive in three (37.5%) and strongly positive in the remaining five (62.5%) positive cases. The results of the R-LB study are summarized in Table 3Go. An example of a negative and a positive autoradiography of [125I]epidepride binding are shown in Fig. 1Go.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Expression of D2 DR subtypes by R-LB study in two cases of human corticotroph pituitary tumors. Photomicrograph of D2 receptor autoradiography. A, Hematoxylin- eosin-stained section; B, autoradiography showing total binding of [125I]epidepride; C, autoradiography showing nonspecific binding (in the presence of 1 µM cabergoline). The picture shows a positive (no. 1, case 2 of Tables 1Go and 3Go) and a negative (no. 2, case 8 of Tables 1Go and 3Go) case. The specificity of binding is demonstrated by the complete disappearance of the radioactive signal in the presence of an excess of the high affinity D2 agonist cabergoline.

 
Immunoblotting

A specific band of the expected molecular weight (68 kDa) of D2 receptor was found at the immunoblot of glycoproteins derived from a corticotroph pituitary tumor (Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Immunoblot of glycoproteins derived from a human corticotroph pituitary tumor with D2 receptor antibody. A and B, Corticotroph pituitary tumor without (A) and with (B) preincubation of the antibody with the antigen. The specificity of the immunoblot is demonstrated by the complete disappearance of the signal after preincubation of the antibody with the antigen (D2 receptor peptide).

 
IHC for D2 receptor

Specific immunoreactivity for D2 receptor was found in 15 (75%) cases, eight (80%) in group 1 and seven (70%) in group 2. It was localized in ACTH- and ACTH/PRL-positive tumor cells and in normal PRL-positive cells or areas localized around tumor tissue or within pituitary. The immunoreactivity was homogeneously distributed in seven (46.7%) and was not homogeneously distributed within the tumor tissue in eight (53.3) cases. It was scored as moderately positive in eight (53.3%) and strongly positive in the remaining seven (46.7%) positive cases. In group 1, a complete correspondence was found between the results of R-LB and the IHC studies. The results of IHC are summarized in Tables 3Go and 4Go for groups 1 and 2, respectively. Examples of a negative and a positive immunostaining for D2 receptor are shown in Fig. 3Go.



View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Expression of D2 receptor by immunohistochemistry in two cases of human corticotroph pituitary tumors. The immunohistochemical study has been performed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections of the tumors. A, Hematoxylin- eosin-stained section; B, ACTH immunostaining; C, PRL immunostaining; D, D2 receptor immunostaining performed with a specific polyclonal D2 receptor antibody; E, D2 receptor immunostaining after preincubation of the antibody with the specific antigen. The picture shows a D2 receptor-positive (no. 1, case 7 of Tables 1Go and 4Go) and a negative (no. 2, case 5 of Tables 1Go and 4Go) case of ACTH-positive basophilic adenoma. ACTH immunostaining is similar in all cases, whereas PRL immunostaining shows a variable pattern in the different cases. In this figure, PRL immunostaining is negative and scattered positive in cases 1 and 2, respectively. The immunostaining for D2 receptor shows a homogeneous distribution in half and a dishomogeneous distribution within tumor tissue in the remaining half of the cases. In this figure, it was homogeneously positive and negative in cases 1 and 2, respectively. The specificity of the immunostaining is demonstrated by the disappearance of colorimetric signal after preabsorption of the antibody with 100 nM specific antigen (D2 receptor peptide). Magnification, x40.

 
RT-PCR study

D2 receptor was expressed in 10 of 12 cases (83.3%). D2long was found in four (40%), D2short in two (20%), and both D2 isoforms in four (40%) positive cases. D4 receptor was expressed in two cases (20%) associated with the expression of D2long in one and with both D2 isoforms in the remaining case. A complete correspondence was found between the results of RT-PCR and those of R-LB and IHC studies. No expression of other DRs were found. The results of the RT-PCR study are summarized in Tables 3Go and 4Go for groups 1 and 2, respectively.

In vitro functional study

A significant and dose-dependent inhibition of ACTH secretion was found in two of four cases (50%) in group 2 after both bromocriptine and cabergoline administration. The inhibition rate was 43% in the first case and 52% in the second one after bromocriptine treatment, and 53% in the first case and 60% in the second one after cabergoline administration, respectively. Both cases (100%) had documented expression of D2 receptor. No significant inhibition of ACTH secretion was found in the remaining two cases after either bromocriptine or cabergoline administration. The inhibition rates were 12% and 15% after bromocriptine and 13% and 14% after cabergoline administration for the two cases, respectively. No D2 expression was found in either case (100%). The specificity of the effects of bromocriptine and cabergoline was demonstrated by the block of this effect in one responsive case by the D2 antagonist sulpiride (no. 8). No significant effect of sulpiride was demonstrated in one nonresponsive case (no. 5). The results of the in vitro study are summarized in Table 4Go. The individual ACTH responses to bromocriptine and cabergoline in all four corticotroph pituitary tumor cultures are shown in Fig. 4Go.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Effect of in vitro administration of bromocriptine ({square}) and cabergoline ({blacksquare}) on ACTH secretion in cell cultures derived by four different corticotroph pituitary tumors [cases 4 (A), 8 (B), 2 (C), and 5 (D) of Tables 1Go and 4Go]. Corticotroph pituitary tumor cells were incubated in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and penicillin/streptomycin for 72 h in quadruplicate without (C) or with the drugs at concentrations of 10–12, 10–10, 10–9, 10–8, and 10–6 M and in two cases (no. 5 and 8) with the drug at a dose of 1 µM coincubated with an excess (10 µM) of the D2 antagonist sulpiride (S). Values are expressed as the percentage secretion and are the mean ± SEM (n = 4/treatment group).

 
In vivo functional study

Significant inhibition of plasma ACTH and serum and urinary cortisol levels after 3 months of cabergoline treatment was found in six of 10 (60%) cases in group 1. However, normalization of urinary cortisol was found in four of 10 (40%) cases, who were considered full responders, whereas a significant decrease without normalization of urinary cortisol was found in the remaining two cases, who were considered partial responders. A significantly different decrease in urinary cortisol levels was found between responder and resistant patients who did not achieve a 50% or greater decrease in urinary cortisol levels after 3 months of cabergoline treatment (79.7 ± 3.6% vs. 27.7 ± 7.8%; P < 0.05). All cases responsive to cabergoline were associated with D2 expression in the tumor tissue. Conversely, all cases not responsive to cabergoline were not associated with D2 expression, with the exception of one case (no. 6 in Tables 1Go and 4Go), which was associated with a poor response to cabergoline treatment. A trend for a significant association between D2 expression and clinical response to cabergoline ({chi}2= 3.35; P = 0.067) was found in the patients in this study. Among the four cases in which a normalization of ACTH and cortisol was obtained, three expressed D2short, which was isolated in one case and associated with D2long in the remaining two cases. The third case was associated with the expression of D2long and D4. The remaining case with a significant in vivo response to cabergoline and the only case not responsive to cabergoline, but D2 positive, expressed D2long, but not D2short or D4, receptors. The individual responses of urinary cortisol levels to the 3-month treatment with cabergoline are shown in Figs. 5Go and 6Go.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Effect of in vivo administration of cabergoline on urinary cortisol secretion in the 10 patients of group 2. Cabergoline was administered at an initial dose of 1 mg/wk in all patients and at a final dose ranging from 1–3 mg/wk after 3 months of treatment. The dose was increased monthly by 1 mg/wk every month until normalization of urinary cortisol excretion. Daily urinary cortisol is expressed as absolute values in micrograms per day.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Individual values of urinary cortisol levels at baseline and during the 3 months of cabergoline treatment of the 10 patients of group 2. Cabergoline was administered at an initial dose of 1 mg/wk in all patients and at a final dose ranging from 1–3 mg/wk after 3 months of treatment. The dose was increased monthly by 1 mg/wk until normalization of urinary cortisol excretion. Daily urinary cortisol is expressed as absolute values in micrograms per day.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The current study clearly demonstrated D2 receptor expression in corticotroph pituitary tumors and the effectiveness of cabergoline treatment in controlling the cortisol hypersecretion associated with CD.

CD is a severe chronic disorder resulting from inappropriate and prolonged exposure to excessive endogenous adrenal cortisol secretion secondary to altered pituitary ACTH secretion due to corticotroph pituitary tumor (17); it represents the most common form of chronic endogenous hypercortisolism, accounting for about 80% of cases of Cushing’s syndrome (17). Neurosurgical resection of the pituitary tumor is the first-line treatment of CD (26). However, transsphenoidal neurosurgery is successful in 70–80% of cases (27, 28). Moreover, neurosurgical outcome is also affected by the lack of tumor evidence at transsphenoidal exploration in 15% and disease relapse after surgical remission in almost 10% of cases (26, 27, 28). Pituitary irradiation and total bilateral adrenalectomy represent second choice treatments in patients not cured by neurosurgery (17). However, although associated with a high success rate, these treatment modalities frequently result in secondary adverse events, such as hypopituitarism in the former and the development of a large and invasive pituitary tumor in the latter. In addition, adrenal insufficiency makes the patient life-long dependent on daily administration of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids (17). Medical treatment presently plays a minor role in the treatment of CD; it is usually performed before neurosurgery or after pituitary irradiation to obtain rapid hormonal normalization before the definitive cure (16). Medical treatment is usually performed with adrenal-blocking drugs that do not act at level of the pituitary tumor (16). On the other hand, although several neuromodulatory drugs acting at the pituitary level have been used in the treatment of CD, no single agent has ever demonstrated sufficient effectiveness to achieve widespread clinical use in the management of the disease (29, 30, 31).

The only neuromodulatory drug that had a relevant, although controversial, role in the treatment of CD was bromocriptine, the most widely used dopamine agonist. Bromocriptine was hypothesized to induce inhibition of ACTH secretion and/or cell growth in corticotroph pituitary tumors, acting through DRs presumably expressed in the pituitary tumor cells. This hypothesis was based on the evidence that DRs with an inhibitory function were demonstrated to be expressed in PRL-secreting pituitary tumors, where they induced a suppression of hormone secretion and inhibition of tumor growth in a great majority of cases (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). In corticotroph pituitary tumors, bromocriptine was found to induce significant inhibition or normalization of cortisol secretion in about 40% of cases after short-term treatment (32). However, controversial results with a success rate ranging from 0–50% were obtained by the different studies that tested the effectiveness of bromocriptine treatment in CD (16). Moreover, normalization of cortisol secretion and/or tumor shrinkage were only sporadically reported after long-term treatment with bromocriptine, demonstrating that only a subset of patients with CD was able to respond to chronic bromocriptine treatment (16, 33, 34). On the other hand, cabergoline was reported to induce significant shrinkage of a silent ACTH-secreting pituitary tumor (35), and a functioning ACTH-secreting pituitary tumor developed after bilateral adrenalectomy in a patient cured from CD (36). However, no study has ever evaluated the effectiveness of cabergoline treatment in CD. The current study evaluated the effectiveness of short-term treatment with cabergoline in a group of patients with CD, demonstrating significant inhibition of cortisol secretion in 60% and normalization of cortisol secretion in 40% of cases, suggesting that cabergoline is more effective than bromocriptine and is potentially useful in the treatment of CD.

The biological basis of the effectiveness of dopamine agonists in the treatment of pituitary tumors is represented by DR expression in the tumor. In the pituitary, the response to dopamine agonists is related to the activity of the D2 receptor (37, 38). This receptor belongs to the family of G protein-coupled receptors and acts through AMP cyclase enzyme inhibition (1, 39). Alternative splicing of the gene encoding D2 receptor leads to two different isoforms: the short isoform, named D2short, and the long isoform, named D2long (1, 40). In normal human pituitary, D2 receptor has been demonstrated to be expressed in more than 75% of the cell population, indicating that D2 receptors are not expressed only in lactotrophs and melanotrophs, which represent no more than 30% of the entire cell population of the normal pituitary gland (37). However, no study has systematically evaluated the colocalization of D2 receptor with the different pituitary hormones in normal human pituitary gland, leaving only as a likely hypothesis the possible expression of D2 receptor in non-PRL- and non-MSH-secreting normal pituitary cells. A variable and heterogeneous expression of D2 receptor has been recently demonstrated by in situ hybridization and IHC in 89% of all types of pituitary tumors, and particularly in 69% of silent or functioning ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors (41). In PRL-secreting pituitary tumors, the presence of a large amount of D2 receptor explains the good therapeutic response to dopamine agonists, which induces PRL secretion inhibition and tumor shrinkage (42). Moreover, cabergoline has been clearly demonstrated to be more effective than bromocriptine in the treatment of this type of tumor (14, 15). Resistance to dopamine agonists in PRL-secreting pituitary tumor may be explained by the absence or a small amount of D2 receptor or its functional inactivity (43). D2 receptor has also been demonstrated in GH-secreting pituitary tumors (44), although their response to dopamine agonists is not as marked as in PRL-secreting pituitary tumors, probably due to a difference in the abundance or functionality of the receptor (32, 45). However, the relative resistance of these tumors to dopamine agonists was found to be overcome in a percentage of cases with the use of cabergoline (46, 47). In clinically nonfunctioning pituitary tumors, D2 receptor has been demonstrated in a large number of cases (48, 49), although tumor shrinkage has been reported in only a minority (34, 50). However, in a recent study cabergoline was demonstrated to be more effective than bromocriptine at inducing tumor shrinkage (51). Dopamine agonist resistance in these tumors may be due to the same D2 receptor abnormalities observed in PRL- and GH-secreting pituitary tumors. However, the expression of D2short, rather than D2long, has been suggested to be associated with a better in vitro response to dopamine agonists (52).

As far as corticotroph pituitary tumors are concerned, no definitive evidence is available on D2 receptor expression, as one study demonstrated the absence of a significant and specific binding of radiolabeled spiperone, a dopamine antagonist, in two corticotroph pituitary tumors (8), whereas another study more recently demonstrated D2 receptor expression by in situ hybridization and IHC studies (41). However, experimental evidence in humans and rats supports the hypothesis of D2 receptor expression and function in corticotroph pituitary tumors. Indeed, bromocriptine was demonstrated to suppress ACTH secretion from cultured human pituitary tumor cells by a dopaminergic mechanism (53) and to induce apoptosis in AtT-20 cells, a murine corticotroph pituitary tumor cell line (54). The current study represents the first clear demonstration of both D2 receptor expression and D2 receptor function in corticotroph pituitary tumors. This finding is strongly supported by the following evidence. 1) D2 receptor expression has been evaluated at a molecular and cellular levels by different techniques, which permitted demonstration of both transcription of D2 receptor gene and translation in a D2 receptor protein. 2) The comparison between the images obtained by R-LB or IHC studies and the histology results clearly demonstrated the presence of D2 receptors in tumor cell cytoplasm or membranes, excluding that the D2 receptor demonstrated at a molecular level might exclusively belong to normal pituitary cell infiltration within or normal pituitary tissue surrounding tumor tissue. 3) The in vitro effect of dopamine agonists on ACTH secretion inhibition in cell cultures obtained by D2 positive-corticotroph pituitary tumor samples and the lack of this effect in cell cultures obtained by D2-negative corticotroph pituitary tumor samples demonstrated the expression of a functional D2 receptor mediating the effect of dopamine agonists in these tumors. 4) The in vivo effect of cabergoline on cortisol secretion inhibition only in CD patients with corticotroph pituitary tumors expressing D2 receptor definitely confirmed that D2 receptor may mediate an important effect of dopamine agonists on ACTH and, consequently, cortisol secretion in corticotroph pituitary tumors.

The results of the current study support a possible therapeutic role of dopamine agonists in the treatment of CD. The expression of D2 receptor in 80% of corticotroph pituitary tumors and the effectiveness of cabergoline treatment in 60%, with normalization of cortisol secretion in 40%, of patients with CD justify the possible use of cabergoline for controlling ACTH and cortisol hypersecretion associated with CD. The different successful rates observed with bromocriptine in past studies and with cabergoline in the present study may be related to the different molecular, biochemical, and pharmacological characteristics of the two dopamine agonists, particularly to the higher specificity and affinity for D2 receptor and the longer duration of action of cabergoline than bromocriptine (55, 56). The evidence of a similar in vitro effect of bromocriptine and cabergoline in the four cases included in the study does not allow us to draw definitive conclusions about the in vitro effects of the two drugs in corticotroph pituitary tumors due to the small number of cases evaluated. Moreover, different in vitro and in vivo behaviors of the two drugs could be also not surprising, considering that the in vivo effect of any drug is influenced by several factors that cannot be completely foreseen and reproduced in in vitro studies. Finally, it should be mentioned that the CD patients included in the current study were selected from two different endocrine clinics on the basis of the availability of tumor tissue, which excluded the smallest tumors, or on the basis of failure of neurosurgery with consequent persistence of CD and/or recurrence of CD, which mainly included the tumors not easily removable by neurosurgery. In this view, the data presented in the current study do not necessarily represent the whole population of patients with CD. Cabergoline may be added to the list of therapeutic options and drugs that can be adopted in different phases and conditions related to a complex disease such as Cushing’s syndrome (57).

In conclusion, the current study demonstrated the expression and function of the D2 receptor in corticotroph pituitary tumors. The presence of a functional D2 receptor in 60% and the demonstration of effectiveness of a short-term treatment with the dopamine agonist cabergoline in normalizing ACTH and cortisol secretion in 40% of corticotroph pituitary tumors strongly support the possible therapeutic use of this drug in the management of persistent and/or recurrent CD.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are greatly indebted to Pharmacia-Pfizer for its technical support of the study.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Pharmacia-Pfizer and in part by a grant from the Italian Minister of University and Research (no. 2003-068735).

Abbreviations: CD, Cushing’s disease; DR, dopamine receptor; HPRT, hypoxanthine ribosyl transferase; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LiDS, lithium dodecyl sulfate; NS, nonspecific; oligo(dT)25, oligo(deoxythymidine)25; poly(A)+, polyadenylated; PRL, prolactin; R-LB, receptor-ligand binding; T, total; TBS-T, Tris-buffered saline-Tween; WGA, wheat-germ agglutinin.

Received May 14, 2003.

Accepted February 1, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Missale C, Nash SR, Robinson SW, Jaber M, Caron MG 1998 Dopamine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol Rev 78:189–225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Caron MG, Beaulieu M, Raymond V, Gagne B, Drouin J, Lefkowitz RJ, Labrie F 1978 Dopaminergic receptors in the anterior pituitary gland. J Biol Chem 253:2244–2253[Free Full Text]
  3. Munemura M, Cote TE, Tsuruta K, Eskay RL, Kebabian JW 1980 The dopamine receptor in the intermediate lobe of the rat anterior pituitary gland: pharmacological characterization. Endocrinology 106:1676–1683
  4. Ben-Jonathan N 1985 Dopamine: a prolactin-inhibiting hormone. Endocr Rev 6:564–589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Memo M, Castelletti L, Missale C, Valerio A, Carruba MO, Spano PF 1986 Dopaminergic inhibition of prolactin release and calcium influx induced by neurotensin in anterior pituitary is independent of cyclic AMP system. J Neurochem 47:1689–1695[Medline]
  6. Stack J, Surprenant A 1991 Dopamine actions on calcium currents, potassium currents and hormone release in rat melanotroph. J Physiol 493:37–58
  7. De Camilli, P, Macconi D, Spada A 1979 Dopamine inhibits adenylate cyclase in human prolactin secreting pituitary adenomas. Nature 278:252–254[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Cronin MJ, Cheung CY, Wilson CB, Jaffe RB, Weiner RI 1980 3H-Spiperone binding to human anterior pituitaries and pituitary adenomas secreting prolactin, growth hormone and adrenocorticotropin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 50:387–391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bression D, Brandi AM, Martres MP, Nousbaum A, Cesselin F, Racadot J, Peillon F 1980 Dopaminergic receptors in human prolactin-secreting adenomas: a quantitative study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 51:1037–1044[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Spada A, Nicosia S, Cortelazzi R, Pezzo G, Bassetti M, Sartorio A, Giannattasio G 1983 In vitro studies on prolactin release and adenylate cyclase activity in human prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. Different sensitivity of macro- and microadenomas to dopamine and vasoactive intestinal polypeptyde. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 56:1–10[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Colao A, Lombardi G 1998 Growth hormone and prolactin excess. Lancet 352:1455–1461[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Shimon I, Melmed S 1998 Management of pituitary tumors. Ann Intern Med 129:472–483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Colao A, Annunziato L, Lombardi G 1998 Treatment of prolactinomas. Ann Med 30:452–459[Medline]
  14. Webster J, Piscitelli G, Polli A, Ferrari CI, Ismail I, Scanlon MF 1994 A comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. N Engl J Med 331:904–909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Colao A, Di Sarno A, Sarnacchiaro F, Ferone D, Di Renzo G, Merola B, Annunziato L, Lombardi G 1997 Prolactinomas resistant to standard dopamine agonists respond to chronic cabergoline treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:876–883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Miller JW, Crapo L 1993 The medical treatment of Cushing’s syndrome. Endocr Rev 14:443–458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Orth DN 1995 Cushing’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 332:791–803[Free Full Text]
  18. Newell-Price J, Trainer P, Besser M, Grossman A 1998 The diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome and pseudo Cushing’s states. Endocr Rev 19:647–672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Colao A, Pivonello R, Spiezia S, Faggiano A, Ferone D, Filippella M, Marzullo P, Cerbone G, Siciliani M, Lombardi G 1999 Persistence of increased cardiovascular risk in patients with Cushing’s disease after five years of successful cure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2664–2672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. de Herder WW, Uitterlinden P, Pieterman H, Thanghe HLJ, Kwekkeboom DJ, Pols HAP, Singh R, van der Berge JH, Lamberts SWJ 1994 Pituitary tumor localization in patients with Cushing’s disease by magnetic resonance imaging. Is there a place for petrosal sinus sampling? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 40:87–92[Medline]
  21. Colao A, Faggiano A, Pivonello R, Pecori Giraldi F, Cavagnini F, Lombardi G 2001 Inferior petrosal sinus sampling in the differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: results of an Italian multicenter study. Eur J Endocrinol 144:499–507[Abstract]
  22. Ferone D, van Hagen PM, van Koestveld PM, Zuijderwijk J, Mooij DM, Lichtenauer-Kaligis EG, Colao A, Bogers AJ, Lombardi G, Lamberts SWJ, Hofland LJ 1999 In vitro characterization of somatostatin receptors in the human thymus and effects of somatostatin and octreotide on cultured thymic epithelial cells. Endocrinology 140:373–380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hofland LJ, Liu Q, van Koestveld PM, Zuijderwijk J, van der Ham F, de Krijger RR, Schonbrunn A, Lamberts SWJ 1999 Immunohistochemical detection of somatostatin receptor subtype sst1 and sst2A in human somatostatin receptor positive tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:775–780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Barreca A, Ponzani P, Arvigo M, Giordano G, Minuto F 1995 Effect of the acid-labile subunit on the binding of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-3 to [125I]IGF-I. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:1318–1324[Abstract]
  25. Hofland LJ, van Koetsveld PM, Verleun TM, Lamberts SWJ 1989 Glycoprotein hormone apha-subunit and prolactin release by cultured pituitary adenoma cells from acromegalic patients: correlation with GH release. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 30:601–611[Medline]
  26. Fahlbusch R, Buchfelder N, Muller OA 1986 Transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease. J R Soc Med 79:262–269[Abstract]
  27. Bochicchio D, Losa M, Buchfelder M, and the European Cushing’s disease survey group 1995 Factors influencing the immediate and late outcome of Cushing’s disease treated by transsphenoidal surgery: a retrospective study by the European Cushing’s disease study group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:3114–3120[Abstract]
  28. Invitti C, Pecori Giraldi F, De Martin M, Cavagnini F, and study group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology on the Pathophysiology of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis 1999 Diagnosis and management of Cushing’s syndrome: results of an Italian multicentre study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:440–448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Allgrove J, Husband P 1977 Cushing’s disease: failure of treatment with cyproheptadine. Br Med J 1:686–687
  30. de Herder WW, Lamberts SWJ 1996 Is there a role for somatostatin and its analogs in Cushing’s syndrome? Metabolism 45(Suppl 1):83–85
  31. Colao A, Pivonello R, Tripodi FS, Orio Jr F, Ferone D, Cerbone G, Di Somma C, Merola B, Lombardi G 1997 Failure of long-term therapy with sodium valproate in Cushing’s disease. J Endocrinol Invest 20:387–392[Medline]
  32. Lamberts SWJ, Klijn JGM, De Quijada M, Timmermans HAT, Uitterlinden P, De Jong FH, Birkenhager JC 1980 The mechanism of the suppressive action of bromocriptine on adrenocorticotropin secretion in patients with Cushing’s disease and Nelson’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 51:307–311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Invitti C, De Martin M, Danesi L, Cavagnini F 1995 Effect of injectable bromocriptine in patients with Cushing’s disease. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 103:266–271[Medline]
  34. Bevan JS, Webster J, Burke CW, Scanlon MF 1992 Dopamine agonists and pituitary tumor shrinkage. Endocr Rev 13:220–240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Petrossians P, Ronci N, Valdes-Socin H, Kalife A, Stevenaert A, Bloch B, Tabarin A, Beckers A 2001 ACTH silent adenoma shrinking under cabergoline. Eur J Endocrinol 144:51–57[Abstract]
  36. Pivonello R, Faggiano A, Di Salle F, Filippella M, Lombardi G, Colao A 1999 Complete remission of Nelson’s syndrome after 1-year treatment with cabergoline. J Endocrinol Invest 22:860–865[Medline]
  37. Lamberts SWJ, McLoad RM 1990 Regulation of prolactin secretion at the level of the lactotroph. Physiol Rev 70:279–318[Free Full Text]
  38. de Herder WW, Reijs AEM, kwekkeboom DJ, Hofland LJ, Nobels FRE, Oei HY, Krenning EP, Lamberts SWJ 1996 In vivo imaging of pituitary tumours using a radiolabeled dopamine D2 receptor radioligand. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 45:755–767[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Civelli O, Bunzow JR, Grandy DK 1993 Molecular diversity of the dopamine receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 33:281–307[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Giros B, Solokoff P, Martres MP, Riou JF, Emorine LJ, Schwartz JC 1989 Alternative splicing directs the expression of two D2 dopamine receptor isoforms. Nature 342:923–926[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Stefaneanu L, Kovacs K, Horvath E, Buchfelder M, Falbusch R, Lancranjan L 2001 Dopamine D2 receptor gene expression in human adenohypophysial adenomas. Endocrine 14:329–336[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Molitch ME, Thorner MO, Wilson C 1997 Management of prolactinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:996–1000[Free Full Text]
  43. Pellegrini I, Rasolonjanahary R, Gunz G, Bertrand P, Delivet S, Jedynak CP, Kordon C, Peillon F, Jaquet P, Enjalbert A 1989 Resistance to bromocriptine in prolactinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 69:500–509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Bression D, Brandi AM, Martres MP, Nousbaum A, Le Dafniet M, Racadot J, Peillon F 1982 Evidence of dopamine receptors in human growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenomas with concomitant study of dopamine inhibition of GH secretion in a perfusion system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 55:589–593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Melmed S, Jackson I, Kleinberg D, Klibanski A 1998 Current treatment guidelines for acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2646–2652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Abs R, Verhelst J, Maiter D, Van Acker K, Nobels F, Coolens J-L, Mahler C, Becker A 1998 Cabergoline in the treatment of acromegaly: a study in 64 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:374–378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Cozzi R, Attanasio R, Barausse M, Dallabonzana D, Orlandi P, Da Re N, Branca V, Oppizzi G, Gelli D 1998 Cabergoline in acromegaly: a renewed role for dopamine agonist treatment? Eur J Endocrinol 139:516–521[Abstract]
  48. Bevan JS, Burke CW 1986 Non functioning pituitary adenomas do not regress during bromocriptine therapy but possess membrane-bound dopamine receptors which bind bromocriptine. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 25:561–572[Medline]
  49. de Herder WW, Reijs AR, de Swart J, Kaandorp Y, Lamberts SWJ, Krenning EP, Kwekkeboom DJ 1999 Comparison of iodine-123 epidepride and iodine-123 IBZM for dopamine D2 receptor imaging in clinically non functioning pituitary macroadenomas and macroprolactinomas. Eur J Nucl Med 26:46–50[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Nobels FRE, de Herder WW, van den Brink WM, Kwekkeboom DJ, Hofland LJ, Zuijderwijk J, de Jong FH, Lamberts SWJ 2000 Long-term treatment with dopamine agonist quinagolide of patients with clinically non-functioning pituitary adenoma. Eur J Endocrinol 143:615–621[Abstract]
  51. Pivonello R, Matrone C, Filippella M, Cavallo LM, Di Somma C, Cappabianca P, Colao A, Annunziato L, Lombardi G 2004 Dopamine receptor expression and function in clinically nonfunctioning pituitary tumors: comparison with the effectiveness of cabergoline treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:1674–1683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Renner U, Arzberger T, Pagotto U, Leimgruber S, Uhl E, Muller A, Lange M, Weindl A, Stalla GK 1998 Heterogeneous dopamine D2 receptor subtype messenger ribonucleic acid expression in clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1368–1375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Adams EF, Ashby MJ, Brown SM, White MC, Mashiter K 1981 Bromocriptine suppresses ACTH secretion from human pituitary tumour cells in culture by a dopaminergic mechanism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 15:479–484[Medline]
  54. Yin D, Kondo S, Tacheuchi J, Morimura T 1994 Induction of apoptosis in murine ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma cells by bromocriptine. FEBS Lett 339:73–75[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Colao A, Lombardi G, Annunziato L 2000 Cabergoline. Exp Opin Pharmacoother 1:555–574[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Colao A, Di Sarno A, Pivonello, Di Somma C, Lombardi G 2002 Dopamine receptor agonists for treating prolactinomas. Exp Opin Invest Drugs 11:787–800
  57. Paez-Pereda M, Artz E, Stalla GK 2002 Cushing’s syndrome: drug targets and therapeutic options. Exp Opin Ther Patents 12:1537–1546[CrossRef]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
D. Ferone, F. Gatto, M. Arvigo, E. Resmini, M. Boschetti, C. Teti, D. Esposito, and F. Minuto
The clinical-molecular interface of somatostatin, dopamine and their receptors in pituitary pathophysiology
J. Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2009; 42(5): 361 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. de Bruin, A. M. Pereira, R. A. Feelders, J. A. Romijn, F. Roelfsema, D. M. Sprij-Mooij, M. O. van Aken, A.-J. van der Lelij, W. W. de Herder, S. W. J. Lamberts, et al.
Coexpression of Dopamine and Somatostatin Receptor Subtypes in Corticotroph Adenomas
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2009; 94(4): 1118 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
C de Bruin, R A Feelders, A M Waaijers, P M van Koetsveld, D M Sprij-Mooij, S W J Lamberts, and L J Hofland
Differential regulation of human dopamine D2 and somatostatin receptor subtype expression by glucocorticoids in vitro
J. Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2009; 42(1): 47 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Boscaro, W. H. Ludlam, B. Atkinson, J. E. Glusman, S. Petersenn, M. Reincke, P. Snyder, A. Tabarin, B. M. K. Biller, J. Findling, et al.
Treatment of Pituitary-Dependent Cushing's Disease with the Multireceptor Ligand Somatostatin Analog Pasireotide (SOM230): A Multicenter, Phase II Trial
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2009; 94(1): 115 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Pivonello, M. C. De Martino, P. Cappabianca, M. De Leo, A. Faggiano, G. Lombardi, L. J. Hofland, S. W. J. Lamberts, and A. Colao
The Medical Treatment of Cushing's Disease: Effectiveness of Chronic Treatment with the Dopamine Agonist Cabergoline in Patients Unsuccessfully Treated by Surgery
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2009; 94(1): 223 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. de Bruin, J. M. Hanson, B. P. Meij, H. S. Kooistra, A. M. Waaijers, P. Uitterlinden, S. W. J. Lamberts, and L. J. Hofland
Expression and Functional Analysis of Dopamine Receptor Subtype 2 and Somatostatin Receptor Subtypes in Canine Cushing's Disease
Endocrinology, September 1, 2008; 149(9): 4357 - 4366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. M. K. Biller, A. B. Grossman, P. M. Stewart, S. Melmed, X. Bertagna, J. Bertherat, M. Buchfelder, A. Colao, A. R. Hermus, L. J. Hofland, et al.
Treatment of Adrenocorticotropin-Dependent Cushing's Syndrome: A Consensus Statement
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2454 - 2462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Ferone, W. W. de Herder, R. Pivonello, J. M. Kros, P. M. van Koetsveld, T. de Jong, F. Minuto, A. Colao, S. W. J. Lamberts, and L. J. Hofland
Correlation of in Vitro and in Vivo Somatotropic Adenoma Responsiveness to Somatostatin Analogs and Dopamine Agonists with Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Somatostatin and Dopamine Receptors and Electron Microscopy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2008; 93(4): 1412 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Munir, F. Song, P. Ince, S. J. Walters, R. Ross, and J. Newell-Price
Ineffectiveness of Rosiglitazone Therapy in Nelson's Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1758 - 1763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Resmini, P. Dadati, J.-L. Ravetti, G. Zona, R. Spaziante, A. Saveanu, P. Jaquet, M. D. Culler, F. Bianchi, A. Rebora, et al.
Rapid Pituitary Tumor Shrinkage with Dissociation between Antiproliferative and Antisecretory Effects of a Long-Acting Octreotide in an Acromegalic Patient
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1592 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
R. Pivonello, D. Ferone, G. Lombardi, A. Colao, S. W J Lamberts, and L. J Hofland
Novel insights in dopamine receptor physiology
Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 156(suppl_1): S13 - S21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
D. Ferone, A. Saveanu, M. D Culler, M. Arvigo, A. Rebora, F. Gatto, F. Minuto, and P. Jaquet
Novel chimeric somatostatin analogs: facts and perspectives
Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 156(suppl_1): S23 - S28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
M. C. Zatelli, M. R. Ambrosio, M. Bondanelli, and E. C d. Uberti
Control of pituitary adenoma cell proliferation by somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists and novel chimeric compounds
Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 156(suppl_1): S29 - S35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
D. Ferone, R. Pivonello, E. Resmini, M. Boschetti, A. Rebora, M. Albertelli, V. Albanese, A. Colao, M. D Culler, and F. Minuto
Preclinical and clinical experiences with the role of dopamine receptors in the treatment of pituitary adenomas
Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 156(suppl_1): S37 - S43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
W. W de Herder, A. E M Reijs, R. A Feelders, M. O van Aken, E. P Krenning, A.-J. van der Lely, and D. J Kwekkeboom
Diagnostic imaging of dopamine receptors in pituitary adenomas
Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 156(suppl_1): S53 - S56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Colao, M. Filippella, R. Pivonello, C. Di Somma, A. Faggiano, and G. Lombardi
Combined therapy of somatostatin analogues and dopamine agonists in the treatment of pituitary tumours
Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 156(suppl_1): S57 - S63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Pivonello, D. Ferone, W. W. de Herder, A. Faggiano, L. Bodei, R. R. de Krijger, G. Lombardi, A. Colao, S. W. J. Lamberts, and L. J. Hofland
Dopamine Receptor Expression and Function in Corticotroph Ectopic Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 65 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
W. W de Herder, A. E M Reijs, R. A Feelders, M. O van Aken, E. P Krenning, H. L J Tanghe, A.-J. van der Lely, and D. J Kwekkeboom
Dopamine agonist therapy of clinically non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas. Is there a role for 123I-epidepride dopamine D2 receptor imaging?
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 155(5): 717 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Pivonello, D. Ferone, W. W. de Herder, R. R. de Krijger, M. Waaijers, D. M. Mooij, P. M. van Koetsveld, A. Barreca, M. L. Del Basso De Caro, G. Lombardi, et al.
Dopamine Receptor Expression and Function in Human Normal Adrenal Gland and Adrenal Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4493 - 4502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pivonello, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lamberts, S. W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pivonello, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lamberts, S. W. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals