help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaczirek, K.
Right arrow Articles by Niederle, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaczirek, K.
Right arrow Articles by Niederle, B.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 89, No. 5 2397-2401
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

Cytotoxic Activity of Camptothecin and Paclitaxel in Newly Established Continuous Human Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Cell Lines

K. Kaczirek, M. Schindl, A. Weinhäusel, C. Scheuba, C. Passler, G. Prager, M. Raderer, G. Hamilton, M. Mittlböck, V. Siegl, R. Pfragner and B. Niederle

Section of Endocrine Surgery (K.K., M.S., C.S., C.P., G.P., B.N.), Division of Experimental Surgery (G.H.), Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, and Department of Internal Medicine I/Oncology (M.R.), and Section of Clinical Biometrics (M.M.), Department of Medical Computer Sciences, University of Vienna Medical School, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; Children’s Cancer Research Institute (A.W.), St. Anna Children’s Hospital, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; and Department of Pathophysiology (V.S., R.P.), University of Graz Medical School, A-8010 Graz, Austria

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Klaus Kaczirek, M.D., Section of Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Vienna, Medical School, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: klaus.kaczirek{at}akh-wien.ac.at.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
At the time of diagnosis, more than one quarter of patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) has distant metastases. Only few of these patients can be cured by surgery. Standard chemotherapy is characterized by low response rates and short response time. The establishment of eight human MTC cell lines provides a new basis for in vitro investigation of cytotoxic drugs. Camptothecin (CPT) and paclitaxel, which never have been investigated in the treatment of MTC, were tested for their cytotoxic profile in comparison with the clinically ineffective dacarbazine.

Eight MTC cell lines were established from seven patients with MTC. IC50 values were calculated from dose-response relationships using cell counts and a formazan dye assay (WST-1).

IC50 values were 3.5 ± 1.2 nmol/liter for CPT and 8.2 ± 1.9 nmol/liter for paclitaxel. Dacarbazine showed no reduction of cell proliferation at concentrations 10-fold higher than clinically achievable.

Given peak plasma concentrations of 65 ± 20 nmol/liter for CPT and 1 µmol/liter for paclitaxel, these promising in vitro results provide a basis for the performance of clinical trials in patients with advanced MTC.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MEDULLARY THYROID CARCINOMA (MTC) is a calcitonin-producing neuroendocrine tumor arising from the parafollicular C cells of the thyroid gland. With an estimated age-adjusted annual incidence of 0.18 for men and 0.23 for women per 100,000 inhabitants (1), MTC accounts for 5–10% of all thyroid malignancies (2).

In 70–80% of cases, MTC occurs sporadically. The remaining 20–30% are inherited in an autosomal-dominant pattern and may occur in three distinct clinical settings: multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome 2A, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome 2B, and familial MTC. Surgical removal of all neoplastic tissue in the neck by total thyroidectomy, central and bilateral (functional) neck dissection, is the only potentially curative treatment in localized disease. However, at the time of initial diagnosis, at least one quarter of patients has distant metastases (3). Thirty to 50% of patients with residual or recurrent disease die within 10 yr of diagnosis (4). To date, there is no established adjuvant treatment for these patients. Radiotherapy may be of some benefit for local/regional tumor control in patients with postoperative gross residual disease or inoperable tumors (5), but an intensive search for new alternative treatment strategies is warranted.

Despite active study, no chemotherapeutic agents have proved to be markedly effective in the management of MTC. In vitro investigation of new therapeutic strategies has been limited by the availability of only one continuous human MTC cell line, the TT line, which was derived from a hereditary MTC with an exon 11, codon 634 mutation (6).

The establishment of eight continuous human MTC cell lines representing different local tumor stages, growth dynamics, immunocytochemical characteristics, ages of patients, and sporadic or hereditary forms (7) provides the tools for a variety of further in vitro research in this field.

Camptothecin (CPT), an inhibitor of topoisomerase I (the parent substance of irinotecan, used for in vitro investigations) and paclitaxel, a taxane with antimicrotubular action, have never been investigated in the treatment of MTC. Both substances have shown successful results combined with reduced toxic side effects in the treatment of various solid tumors, such as colorectal, breast, ovarian, and small-cell lung cancer. Positive results in the therapy of MTC may be expected.

The aim of the present study was to assess the in vitro activity of CPT and paclitaxel in comparison with dacarbazine (DTIC), as a control with no known clinical benefit, using eight human MTC cell lines.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

Eight continuous cell lines were established from seven patients with biochemically proven and histologically confirmed MTCs. Six patients had sporadic tumors, and one patient (cell line GSJO) had hereditary MTC (mutation at exon 14, codon 804; amino acid exchange Val>Met, GTG>ATG). Cells were cultured from primary tumors (lines GSJO and SHER-I) or lymph node metastases (MTC-SK, SINJ, BOJO, RARE, GRS IV, and GRS V). The lines GRS IV and GRS V comprise cultures of lymph node metastases of one patient at two different operation times. Three patients (lines MTC-SK, BOJO, and GRS IV/GRS V) had generalized disease at the time of operation and died 4 (line GRS IV/GRS V), 14 (line BOJO), and more than 50 months (line MTC-SK) after the primary operation. The remaining four patients have been alive for 27, 28, 30, and 146 months of follow-up, respectively. All of them have biochemically residual/recurrent disease, and three have measurable distant metastatic disease. Table 1Go summarizes the clinical and genetic data and gives the passage numbers of the cultures tested in this study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Clinical characteristics

 
Informed consent for surgical therapy and scientific research with patient data and tumor tissue was obtained from all patients.

Cell cultivation

Tumor tissue obtained during primary surgery and/or reoperation was transported in Ham’s F12 medium (Biochrom AG-Seromed, Berlin, Germany) containing 100 IU penicillin/ml and 100 µg streptomycin/ml. Directly after transportation, tissue was treated for 20 min with PBS containing 1000 IU penicillin/ml and 1000 µg streptomycin/ml. Previously described techniques for primary and continuous cultivation of MTC were applied (8, 9). Briefly, tissue was dissociated mechanically, and erythrocyte lysis buffer was applied for 15 min. The cell suspension was centrifuged and resuspended in Ham’s F12 medium, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (PAA Laboratories, Exton, PA), 100 IU penicillin, and 100 µg streptomycin/ml medium at an estimated cell number of 3–5 x 105 cells/ml and incubated at 37 C in a 5% CO2 and 95% humidified atmosphere. Cultures were maintained in vented T-12.5, T-25, and T-150 culture flasks (Costar, Cambridge, MA). Stromal fibroblasts were separated from tumor cells by repeated selective adhesion and selective detachment treatment (10). Antibiotics were omitted after a few passages. All cell lines grew anchorage independent as suspensions of single cells as well as spheroid aggregates. Cultures have been tested at regular intervals to exclude mycoplasma contamination (Hoechst dye 33258, Sigma, Vienna, Austria). All cell lines were tested by immunocytochemistry, electron microscopy, in situ hybridization, and tumorigenicity as described recently (7, 11). Each cell line retained characteristic features of MTC. Additionally, RET proto-oncogene mutation status was determined in all sporadic cell lines. No mutations at exons 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, and 16 were found in all cell lines.

Chemosensitivity tests

CPT (parent substance of irinotecan, Camptosar, used for in vitro investigations), paclitaxel (Taxol), and DTIC were obtained from Sigma. Stock solutions of the compounds were prepared in 70% ethanol or dimethyl sulfoxide and diluted more than 100-fold for chemosensitivity assays. Cells were counted (CASY-1 Cell Size/Analyzer Counter, Schärfe System, GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany) and transferred to the wells of microtiter plates (96 wells, Greiner, Kremsmunster, Austria) in a cell density of 2 x 104 cells/well in 100 µl medium. Appropriate dilutions of test compounds were added to a total volume of 200 µl/well, and the plates were incubated for 24, 48, and 72 h (48, 96, and 168 h for DTIC where the active metabolite 5-amino-imidazole 4-carboxamide is slowly formed in vitro) under cell culture conditions. Solvent controls (ethanol or dimethyl sulfoxide) were added in all tests. Cell viability was assessed using a modified tetrazolium dye assay (cell proliferation reagent WST-1, Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Vienna, Austria) and measurement of the reduced formazan at 450 nm (ELISA, Eurogenetics, Tessenderlo, Belgium) after 1, 2, or 3 d of incubation for CPT/paclitaxel and 2, 4, or 7 d of incubation for DTIC. Simultaneously, cell counting was performed (CASY-1 Cell Size/Analyzer Counter, Schärfe) as a control toxicity end-point parameter. Each test was performed in triplicate, and mean values were used for further calculations.

IC50 values were calculated by linear regression analysis of the obtained dose-response curves.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All cell lines were sensitive to CPT and paclitaxel and resistant to DTIC.

The cytotoxic/cytostatic effects of CPT and paclitaxel became apparent after a minimum of 24 h of incubation and increased with longer incubation times. Shorter exposure times (10 and 18 h) did not show any cytotoxic or cytostatic effect on all tested cell lines. Results are therefore not reported.

There were no significant differences in sensitivity to CPT and paclitaxel between the tested cell lines.

IC50 values were calculated after 3 d of incubation with CPT or paclitaxel, respectively. For CPT, IC50 values ranged from 1.4 nmol/liter (cell line SHER I, passage number 17) to 6.0 nmol/liter (cell line MTC-SK, passage number 210). For paclitaxel, IC50 values ranged from 6.0 nmol/liter (cell line GSJO, passage number 11) to 11.2 nmol/liter (cell line GRS V, passage number 24). Mean IC50 values were 3.5 ± 1.2 nmol/liter for CPT and 8.2 ± 1.9 nmol/liter for paclitaxel. Table 2Go shows the calculated IC50 values at day 3 for CPT and paclitaxel for all tested cell lines.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. IC50 values at d 3

 
Figures 1Go and 2Go depict the mean dose-dependent fractions of viable cells after 1, 2, and 3 d of incubation with CPT or paclitaxel and give the exact mean viability values.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Dose/time-dependent mean viability—CPT.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Dose/time-dependent mean viability—paclitaxel.

 
Mean fractions of viable cells at IC50 concentrations were 83.5, 57.6, and 50% for CPT and 82.1, 56.7, and 50% for paclitaxel on d 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

For DTIC no consistent dose-response relationships could be determined after 2, 4, and 7 d of incubation at doses of 0–100 µg/ml (0–550 µmol/liter).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Currently, chemotherapy for MTC is limited to patients with advanced disease or rapidly progressive metastatic tumors. This is due to low response rates, associated toxicity of most substances, and the generally slowly progressive course of MTC. However, 30–50% of patients with residual or recurrent disease die within 10 yr of diagnosis (4), and, at the time of initial diagnosis, at least one quarter of patients has distant metastases (3). These patients could potentially benefit of adjuvant treatment.

In this study, eight cell lines of seven patients with different tumor stages, sporadic and hereditary forms of MTC, were tested. Two of these patients (cell lines BOJO, GRS) had a very aggressive clinical course and died of tumor generalization 4 and 14 months, respectively, after initial diagnosis/operation. One additional patient had tumor generalization at the time of initial operation but a slower progressive clinical course and died more than 50 months postoperatively. The remaining four patients have been alive for 27, 28, 30, and 146 months of follow-up, respectively. All of them have biochemically residual/recurrent disease, and three have evidence of distant metastases. Benefit of adjuvant treatment can therefore be expected in all seven of these patients.

Drugs investigated in various trials include Adriamycin (generic, doxorubicin), bleomycin, carboplatin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, DTIC, epirubicin, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), methotrexate, streptozocin, vincristine, and vindesine (5, 12). Response rates have been partial and short-lasting (only a few months) in most reports.

DTIC used as monotherapy showed complete response in one case report of MTC (13). Various combinations of DTIC + 5-FU (14, 15, 16), DTIC + 5-FU + epirubicin (17), or DTIC + cyclophosphamide + vincristine (18) have been applied in a limited number of patients and showed complete response rates in 3% and partial response rates in 24% (5). No benefit could be demonstrated regarding survival.

We therefore chose DTIC as a control substance with limited clinical value.

CPT and paclitaxel have never been investigated in the treatment of MTC but are in clinical use and have shown promising results in the treatment of colorectal, breast, ovarian, and small-cell lung cancer. Most important side effects include severe diarrhea, hematotoxicity, and acute cholinergic syndrome for CPT and hematotoxicity, hypersensitivity reactions, peripheral neuropathy, and bradycardia for paclitaxel.

Before these substances are used in new indications, in vitro cytotoxicity testing is mandatory. However, human MTC is one of the most difficult cancers to grow in cell culture. For two decades, the only commercially available MTC cell line has been the TT line (7, 19). Results of studies performed on this line can only rarely be transformed into clinical practice. In vitro cytotoxicity studies performed on long-term cultures of MTC cells (20, 21, 22) are difficult to interpret because of unstable cell-culture conditions, which may confound results of viability measurements. The establishment of eight further continuous MTC cell lines provides useful experimental material (7). Cell lines were derived from patients with different tumor stages, clinical behavior, and immunocytochemical characteristics. This underlines the heterogeneity of the cell lines.

These novel lines grow anchorage independent, which is different from the TT cell line. We therefore excluded results of cytotoxicity testing in the TT line from the current study.

Comparison of the IC50 values of chemotherapeutics obtained in vitro with clinically achievable peak plasma concentrations provides a rough estimate of the expected clinical sensitivity. The in vivo values of tumor cells may be lower during prolonged application of a drug or higher due to lower tissue concentration, diminished tumor cell accessibility, and adverse effects caused by the presence of serum or other factors.

Achievable peak plasma concentrations are 65 ± 20 nmol/liter for CPT derivative topotecan (23), 1 µmol/liter for paclitaxel (24), and 47.3 ± 3.3 µmol/liter for DTIC. We found all cell lines to be sensitive to CPT and paclitaxel. Mean IC50 values at day 3 were 3.6 ± 0.9 nmol/liter for CPT (5.5% of peak plasma concentration) and 8.1 ± 2.7 nmol/liter for paclitaxel (0.8% of peak plasma concentration). At IC50 concentrations, both substances showed the same cytotoxic/cytostatic potential after 1, 2, or 3 d of incubation.

DTIC was applied for a maximum of 7 d in a dosage of up to 550 µmol/liter, which is 11-fold above the clinically achievable peak plasma concentration. No cytotoxic/cytostatic potential could be determined among all cell lines.

Resistance of MTC to chemotherapy was attributed to expression of the multidrug resistance mdr1 gene (25) encoding a transmembrane glycoprotein p-170 that antagonizes intracellular accumulation of cytotoxic agents of natural derivation. Because all cell lines were highly sensitive to CPT and paclitaxel, p-glycoprotein 170 was not determined in the tested cell lines.

With all the limitations of in vitro testing, our results suggest a potential clinical effect of CPT and paclitaxel and provide a basis for the design of clinical trials for patients with advanced MTC.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Hochschul Jubiläumsfond H-144/2001 of the University of Vienna.

Abbreviations: CPT, Camptothecin; DTIC, dacarbazine; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma.

Received July 29, 2003.

Accepted January 27, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bergholm U, Adami HO, Telenius-Berg M, Johansson H, Wilander E 1990 Incidence of sporadic and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma in Sweden 1959 through 1981. A nationwide study in 126 patients. Swedish MCT Study Group. Acta Oncol 29:9–15[Medline]
  2. Saad MF, Ordonez NG, Rashid RK, Guido JJ, Hill Jr CS, Hickey RC, Samaan NA 1984 Medullary carcinoma of the thyroid. A study of the clinical features and prognostic factors in 161 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 63:319–342[Medline]
  3. Scheuba C, Kaserer K, Weinhausl A, Pandev R, Kaider A, Passler C, Prager G, Vierhapper H, Haas OA, Niederle B 1999 Is medullary thyroid cancer predictable? A prospective study of 86 patients with abnormal pentagastrin tests. Surgery 126:1089–1095; discussion 1096[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Marsh DJ, Learoyd DL, Robinson BG 1995 Medullary thyroid carcinoma: recent advances and management update. Thyroid 5:407–424[Medline]
  5. Orlandi F, Caraci P, Mussa A, Saggiorato E, Pancani G, Angeli A 2001 Treatment of medullary thyroid carcinoma: an update. Endocr Relat Cancer 8:135–147[Abstract]
  6. Leong SS, Horoszewicz JS, Shimaoka K, Friedman M, Kawinski E, Song MJ, Zeigel R, Chu TM, Baylin S, Mirand BA 1981 A new cell line for study of human medullary thyroid carcinoma. In: Andreoli M, Monaco F, Robbins J, eds. Advances in thyroid neoplasia. Rome: Field Educational Italia; 95–108
  7. Pfragner R, Wirnsberger GH, Ingolic E, Niederle B 2002 Medullary thyroid carcinomas in cell culture—models for future therapies. Wien Klin Wochenschr 114:279–283[Medline]
  8. Pfragner R, Höfler H, Behmel A, Ingolic E, Walser V 1990 Establishment and characterization of continuous cell line MTC-SK derived from a human medullary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res 50:4160–4166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Pfragner R, Wirnsberger GH, Behmel A, Wolf G, Passath A, Ingolic E, Adamiker D, Schauenstein K 1993 New continuous cell line from human medullary thyroid carcinoma: SINJ. Phenotypic analysis and in vivo carcinogenesis. Int J Oncol 2:831–836
  10. Freshney RI 2000 Culture of animal cells—a manual of basic technique. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 211–212
  11. Pfragner R, Behmel A, Ingolic E, Wirnsberger GH 2004 Culture of human neuroendocrine cells. In: Pfragner R, Freshney RI, eds. Culture of human tumor cells. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 373–403
  12. Vitale G, Caraglia M, Ciccarelli A, Lupoli G, Abbruzzese A, Tagliaferri P 2001 Current approaches and perspectives in the therapy of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 91:1797–1808[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kessinger A, Foley JF, Lemon HM 1983 Therapy of malignant APUD cell tumors. Effectiveness of DTIC. Cancer 51:790–794[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Petursson SR 1988 Metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Complete response to combination chemotherapy with dacarbazine and 5-fluorouracil. Cancer 62:1899–1903[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Orlandi F, Caraci P, Berruti A, Puligheddu B, Pivano G, Dogliotti L, Angeli A 1994 Chemotherapy with dacarbazine and 5-fluorouracil in advanced medullary thyroid cancer. Ann Oncol 5:763–765[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Schlumberger M, Abdelmoumene N, Delisle MJ Couette JE 1995 Treatment of advanced medullary thyroid cancer with an alternating combination of 5 FU-streptozocin and 5 FU-dacarbazine. The Groupe d’Etude des Tumeurs a Calcitonine (GETC). Br J Cancer 71:363–365[Medline]
  17. Bajetta E, Rimassa L, Carnaghi C, Seregni E, Ferrari L, Di Bartolomeo M, Regalia E, Cassata A, Procopio G, Mariani L 1998 5-Fluorouracil, dacarbazine, and epirubicin in the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer 83:372–378[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Wu LT, Averbuch SD, Ball DW, de Bustros A, Baylin SB, McGuire 3rd WP, 1994 Treatment of advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma with a combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dacarbazine. Cancer 73:432–436[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Cooley LD, Elder FF, Knuth A, Gagel RF 1995 Cytogenetic characterization of three human and three rat medullary thyroid carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 80:138–149[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Massart C, Gibassier J, Lucas C, Pourquier P, Robert J 1996 [Expression of the MDR1 gene in five human cell lines of medullary thyroid cancer and reversion of the resistance to doxorubicine by ciclosporin A and verapamil]. Bull Cancer 83:39–45 (Review) (French)[Medline]
  21. Massart C, Gibassier J, Le Gall F, Raoul ML, Leclech G, Lucas C 1996 [Modulation of cisplatin cytotoxicity by amphotericin B in six human cell lines of medullary thyroid cancer]. Bull Cancer 83:619–625 (Review) (French)[Medline]
  22. Goretzki PE, Wahl RA, Becker R, Koller C, Branscheid D, Grussendorf M, Roeher HD 1987 Nerve growth factor (NGF) sensitizes human medullary thyroid carcinoma (hMTC) cells for cytostatic therapy in vitro. Surgery 102:1035–1042[Medline]
  23. Dennis MJ, Beijnen JH, Grochow LB, van Warmerdam LJ 1997 An overview of the clinical pharmacology of topotecan. Semin Oncol 24:S5-12–S5-18
  24. Hughes AN, Griffin MJ, Newell DR, Calvert AH, Johnston A, Kerr B, Lee C, Liang B, Boddy AV 2000 Clinical pharmacokinetic and in vitro combination studies of nolatrexed dihydrochloride (AG337, Thymitaq) and paclitaxel. Br J Cancer 82:1519–1527[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Yang KP, Liang YF, Samaan NA 1991 Intrinsic drug resistance in a human medullary thyroid carcinoma cell line: association with overexpression of mdrl gene and low proliferation fraction. Anticancer Res 11:1065–1068[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. J. Strock, J.-I. Park, D. M. Rosen, B. Ruggeri, S. R. Denmeade, D. W. Ball, and B. D. Nelkin
Activity of Irinotecan and the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor CEP-751 in Medullary Thyroid Cancer
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2006; 91(1): 79 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaczirek, K.
Right arrow Articles by Niederle, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaczirek, K.
Right arrow Articles by Niederle, B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals