help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pacak, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nieman, L. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pacak, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nieman, L. K.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 89, No. 5 2214-2221
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

The Role of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and [111In]-Diethylenetriaminepentaacetate-D-Phe-Pentetreotide Scintigraphy in the Localization of Ectopic Adrenocorticotropin-Secreting Tumors Causing Cushing’s Syndrome

Karel Pacak, Ioannis Ilias, Clara C. Chen, Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Millie Whatley and Lynnette K. Nieman

Pediatric and Reproductive Endocrinology Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K.P., I.I., L.K.N.), and Nuclear Medicine Department, Clinical Center (C.C.C., J.A.C., M.W.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1583

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Karel Pacak, Unit on Clinical Neuroendocrinology, Pediatric and Reproductive Endocrinology Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 9D42, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1583. E-mail: karel{at}mail.nih.gov.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Conventional imaging modalities cannot localize the source of ACTH in 30–50% of patients with Cushing’s syndrome (CS) caused by ectopic ACTH secretion (EAS). We prospectively evaluated whether [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) or [111In]-diethylenetriaminepentaacetate-D-Phe-pentetreotide (OCT) at higher than standard doses of radionuclide (18 mCi; H-OCT), can detect these tumors. Seventeen patients with presumed EAS based on inferior petrosal sinus sampling results underwent routine anatomical imaging studies [computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] and OCT scintigraphy with 6 mCi (L-OCT). Research studies included FDG-PET in all patients and H-OCT if L-OCT was negative. ACTH-secreting tumors were localized in 13 patients and were occult in four. Nine of 17 CT, six of 16 MRI, six of 17 FDG-PET, eight of 17 L-OCT, and one of nine H-OCT studies were true positives. The sensitivity of CT and combined H- and L-OCT scintigraphy was higher (both 53%; 95% confidence interval, 29–76%) than that of MRI (37%; 95% confidence interval, 16–64%) or FDG-PET (35%; 95% confidence interval, 15–61%). FDG-PET did not detect tumors that were occult on CT/MRI. L-OCT was a useful complementary modality to CT and MRI. As H-OCT identified a tumor in one patient with otherwise negative imaging, it should be considered only when other imaging modalities fail to localize the ACTH-secreting tumor in patients with EAS.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IMAGING STUDIES ARE the cornerstone for tumor localization in patients with Cushing’s syndrome (CS) caused by ectopic ACTH secretion (EAS) (1). Anatomical imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is used most commonly to localize the source of EAS. However, in 30–50% of patients with EAS, the source of ACTH secretion cannot be found despite repeated studies over time (1). Up to half of these patients do not respond to medical therapy of hypercortisolism and must undergo bilateral adrenalectomy with life-long replacement therapy. Thus, there is a need for improved imaging techniques to identify ACTH-secreting tumors.

Functional imaging with nuclear medicine techniques enables in vivo imaging of physiological and pathophysiological processes. Among these techniques, positron emission tomography (PET) studies are increasingly used in oncology (2). [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) whole body scanning is by far the most widely used and recognized application of PET for tumor identification (3), and although it often fails to visualize the more common differentiated tumors (4), poorly differentiated tumors with high proliferative activity may take up FDG (5, 6).

Scintigraphy with the somatostatin analog [111In]-diethylenetriaminepentaacetate-D-Phe-pentetreotide (octreoscan; OCT) at the usual injected radionuclide dose of 6 mCi (L-OCT) may not always detect neuroendocrine tumors, and previous studies with L-OCT have shown mixed results (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). Detectability of lesions in scintigraphic studies depends on multiple factors, including lesion size, location, type, or degree of somatostatin receptor expression (13, 14, 15, 16, 17), and also on the amount of radioactivity in the lesion. Scans obtained after very high doses of OCT for therapy (180 mCi) have been reported to detect more lesions than pretherapy diagnostic scans in patients with gastroenteropancreatic tumors (18). Before this study a patient evaluated for EAS at our institution underwent OCT scintigraphy with a 12-mCi dose after a 6-mCi dose scan that yielded equivocal results. This higher dose gave definite results, and the patient went on to have a pulmonary carcinoid successfully resected (our unpublished observations). This case led us to consider the hypothesis that a higher dose of OCT might identify ACTH-secreting tumors not detectable on L-OCT investigations because of their small size or lesser degree of somatostatin receptor expression by increasing the absolute amount of radioactivity taken up by the tumor. In the present study, we also performed FDG-PET to assess the sensitivity of FDG for detection of ACTH-secreting tumors. These modalities were compared with the results of conventional imaging (CT, MRI, and L-OCT).


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Seventeen eligible patients were prospectively evaluated at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center to determine the etiology of CS. The patients were admitted to the Clinical Center in the years 1998–2003, based on the high suspicion of the presence of EAS from biochemical tests and negative or equivocal imaging studies of the pituitary gland. Patients diagnosed with Cushing’s disease were excluded from this study.

The research protocol was approved by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Subjects were eligible for this study if they were hypercortisolemic and had a normal or increased plasma ACTH concentration. To verify the cause of CS, we performed and interpreted bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (19), an ovine CRH stimulation test (20), and/or an 8-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test (21), as previously described.

Patients included in this study did not show a central to peripheral ACTH gradient on inferior petrosal sinus sampling and had normal petrosal sinus venous anatomy. They were considered to have EAS and underwent anatomical imaging studies (CT and MRI of the neck, chest, and abdomen) as well as L-OCT for the localization of ACTH-secreting tumor. Additional research imaging studies included higher than standard dose OCT (H-OCT) scintigraphy, if L-OCT was negative, and FDG-PET. Urinary catecholamines and metanephrines and plasma metanephrines were measured in patients with hypertension to exclude pheochromocytoma.

After evaluation during the protocol, patients with presumed EAS tumor underwent surgery or biopsy. Patients with an unknown/occult source of EAS received steroidogenesis inhibitors or adrenalectomy to normalize cortisol levels. Some of these patients returned to the NIH Clinical Center to have repeated imaging studies. The protocol allowed only two FDG and two H-OCT studies at more than a 12-month interval. Other imaging studies were performed on multiple occasions. In three patients with negative evaluation for the localization of the ACTH-secreting tumor at the time of the initial evaluation, subsequent studies guided successful surgery. Four patients continue with occult disease at the time of this report (two of them had multiple follow-up evaluations at the NIH Clinical Center).

CT and MRI studies were obtained before the research studies. CT was performed with a Hi Speed Advantage Scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). Section thickness was 5 mm through the chest and upper abdomen to the adrenal gland and 10 mm through the lower abdomen. All sections were contiguous. A contrast agent was given by mouth. Most studies were performed during a bolus of nonionic water-soluble contrast (130 ml, injected at 2 ml/sec), given at the radiologist’s discretion.

MRI was obtained with a 1.5-T scanner (Picker, Highland Heights, OH). T1- and T2-weighted imaging was performed in all patients. Images were obtained in the coronal and axial planes on all studies. T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) imaging was performed with a repetition time (TR) of 300 msec, an echo time (TE) of 10 msec (TR/TE = 300/10), and eight excitations. T2-weighted spin-echo imaging was performed with a TR/TE ratio of 2000/80 and two excitations. In four patients short-time inversion-recovery sequence imaging was also performed with a TR of 1600 msec, a TE of 30 msec, an inversion time of 100 msec, and four excitations.

FDG was prepared by the method of Hamacher et al. (22). After fasting for at least 6 h, during which patients were encouraged to drink water, 20 mCi FDG was administered iv. After injection, the patients rested for 40 min, followed by whole body imaging on a GE Advance PET scanner (General Electric Medical Systems). Ten-minute two-dimensional mode emission and 8-min transmission scans were acquired. Images were acquired in a 256 x 256 matrix, and reconstruction was performed with an iterative algorithm. Images were reconstructed and reviewed by use of an orthogonal display as well as viewing maximal intensity reprojected images.

For L-OCT, patients were injected with 6 mCi OCT prepared from a single pentetreotide kit (10 µg; Mallinckrodt, St. Louis, MO) and were imaged at 4 and 24 h. For H-OCT, patients received 18 mCi OCT (prepared using three kits or 30 µg pentetreotide) and were imaged at 4, 24, and occasionally 48 h. At 4 h, whole body and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images of skull, chest, abdomen, and pelvis were obtained, and at 24 h and 48 h, SPECT images were repeated as needed. Repeat scans (for both L-OCT and H-OCT examinations) were made when 4 h images were negative or equivocal, or when a positive finding at 4 h might be due to physiological uptake. For example, SPECT was repeated to ascertain that faint foci persisted on follow-up or to differentiate abdominal foci of uptake from activity in normal bowel. Images were obtained using an ADAC (Milipitas, CA) Vertex dual-head and a Trionix (Twinburg, OH) triple-head XLT {gamma}- camera equipped with medium energy, parallel hole collimators centered over both 111In photon peaks (173 and 247 KeV) with 20% windows. For SPECT, 120 sequential, 30-sec (dual-head) or 120 sequential, 40-sec (triple-head) images were obtained. The images were reconstructed with the manufacturers’ software using a standard filtered back-projection algorithm. Hamming (Trionix) or Hanning (ADAC) filters were used.

Based on our experience, tumors producing ACTH are most commonly localized in the lungs, thymus, and pancreas (23). Therefore, any questionable finding (in CT/MRI or scintigraphies) in these regions was reevaluated with high resolution CT or MRI.

Readers of CT and MRI were not blinded to the results of other imaging studies, but these studies were generally interpreted before the research studies were performed, except when repeat studies for questionable findings were obtained. FDG-PET and OCT studies were each read by a nuclear medicine physician blinded to the results of all other imaging studies, except that as the H-OCT was performed only if L-OCT was negative, the L-OCT result was known by the H-OCT reader.

For sensitivity calculations, positive results of CT/MRI imaging were considered as either true positives (when the ACTH-secreting tumor was identified) or false positives (when the lesion seen was not the ACTH-secreting tumor), whereas negative results were considered to be false negatives (because the ACTH-secreting lesion was not seen). The PET images were evaluated qualitatively; focal areas of uptake believed to be nonphysiological were scored as positive (true or false; in the same way as CT/MRI) in a manner considered to be adequate for oncological PET studies (24, 25). In the same manner as PET studies, OCT scintigraphy was considered abnormal if definite nonphysiological uptake was observed. Mild bilateral adrenal uptake with either PET or OCT was not considered abnormal. Sensitivity was calculated as the number of true positive results per number of all patients studied with the modality (26).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Results with details of the patients’ initial imaging studies are shown in Table 1GoGo. Patients 1, 2, and 8 were initially admitted to the NIH Clinical Center 5–10 yr before the present study, at which time they were diagnosed with EAS and underwent surgical treatment. They were reevaluated in this study because of EAS recurrence. Ten of the 17 patients had successful tumor identification based on the initial imaging. Patients 5, 7, and 10, with negative initial imaging, later had successful tumor resection based on subsequent imaging studies. Four patients remain with occult disease.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Imaging studies and surgical and pathology results of 17 patients with CS due to ectopic ACTH secretion

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1A. Continued

 
Imaging results

Only the results of the patients’ initial imaging studies are presented (Table 1GoGo). Of these, nine of 17 CT, six of 16 MRI, six of 17 FDG-PET, eight of 17 L-OCT, and one of nine H-OCT were true positives, as confirmed at subsequent surgery or biopsy in 13 patients (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. A, FDG-PET scan of patient 13, diagnosed with an ACTH-secreting right adrenal pheochromocytoma, showing uptake in the region of the right adrenal (arrow). B, Negative low-dose octreoscan of the same patient as A. C, Negative FDG-PET scan of patient 1, diagnosed with a recurrent pulmonary neuroendocrine tumor. D, Low-dose octreoscan of patient 1 showing mediastinal uptake (arrow).

 
In the localization of ACTH-secreting tumors, FDG-PET results were concordant with CT and/or MRI in six true positive studies (no. 3, 6, 8, 11, 12, and 13). L-OCT results were concordant with CT and/or MRI in eight true positive studies (no. 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 12) (Fig. 1DGo).

On CT/MRI, false positive findings were seen in three patients (no. 2, 11, and 17), although in patient 11 the lesions were attributed to pulmonary infection. FDG-PET studies showed false positive uptake foci in four patients (no. 4, 6, 11, and 13). These included uptake in the chest wall (no. 4), in rib fractures (no. 6), bilateral hilar uptake in another patient (no. 13), and multiple lung foci in the patient with lung infection (no. 11). No false positive findings were noted with OCT.

CT and/or MRI in six patients (no. 4–7, 12, and 15) showed bilaterally hyperplastic adrenal glands. FDG-PET scanning in six patients (no. 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, and 15) and L-OCT and H-OCT in five patients (no. 3, 5, 7, 14 and 17) showed radionuclide uptake by the adrenals.

For sensitivity calculations, studies were scored as being true positive if the ACTH-secreting tumor was detected, even if false positive findings were also seen. Thus, the FDG-PET study of patient 6 was considered as being overall true positive because the focus of uptake in the lung coincided with the surgically verified lesion, and the false positive foci of uptake in the ribs coincided with healed rib fractures. The FDG-PET study of patient 11 was also considered as being true positive because the ACTH-secreting tumor was imaged whereas the multiple false positive foci of uptake in the chest were attributed to concomitant lung infection (nocardiosis). In patient 13, FDG-PET had a false positive finding of bilateral hilar uptake (Fig. 1Go); nevertheless, it also showed the adrenal lesion that was surgically verified, so overall, this study was also considered to be true positive. In localizing ACTH-secreting tumors, the sensitivity of CT or OCT scintigraphy (combining the results of both L-OCT and H-OCT) was higher (both 53%; 95% confidence interval, 29–76%) than that of MRI (37%; 95% confidence interval, 16–64%) or FDG-PET (35%; 95% confidence interval, 15–61%; Table 1GoGo).

Management and outcome

Based on initial or subsequent imaging results, 12 patients underwent surgery (no. 1–10, 13, and 17), including one with negative anatomical imaging and positive H-OCT (no. 4). In all patients who underwent thoracotomy, lymph node dissection was performed for oncological staging.

One patient (no. 17) was operated upon based on positive CT and MRI findings, but no tumor was found; in retrospect, these imaging results were considered to be false positives. Two others with positive imaging studies and biopsy-proven ACTH-secreting tumors did not undergo surgical resection (one with an ACTH-secreting olfactory esthesioneuroblastoma and one with small cell lung cancer; no. 11 and 12, respectively).

In primary or metastatic tumors from eight patients, ACTH staining was positive on immunohistochemistry (no. 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7–10). Patient 13 had negative tumor staining for ACTH, but hypercortisolism resolved after tumor resection. No ACTH stain was available in tumors from two patients (no. 3 and 6). ACTH staining was positive on biopsy tissue in two patients who were not operated upon (no. 11 and 12).

The resected tumors ranged in size from 0.6–7.0 cm. The smallest tumor detected in this study (excluding subsequent evaluations) with CT, MRI, FDG-PET, and L-OCT was 1.3 cm (in maximum dimension), and the smallest detected with H-OCT was 0.6 cm.

Four patients remained with occult disease, including two after reevaluation (no. 15 and 16).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, an ACTH-secreting tumor was identified as often with anatomical imaging modalities as with functional imaging modalities, because CT had an equal sensitivity with OCT (L-OCT and H-OCT combined), and MRI with FDG-PET had almost equal, but lower, sensitivities. However, there were patients with discordant anatomical and functional studies. Our results suggest that FDG-PET or MRI should not be used alone to identify ACTH-secreting tumors, and that H-OCT should be considered in the evaluation of patients with EAS only if the other imaging modalities fail to identify such a tumor. CT, MRI, and L-OCT are complementary studies, so that abnormalities in one may provoke a closer look at the other results. Thus, despite similar sensitivities, we advise imaging with all three modalities.

A variety of factors may influence the ability of FDG-PET to localize a tumor. Increased tumoral metabolic rate and glucose transport through the cell membrane are necessary for increased uptake of FDG (27). FDG-PET is most likely to identify tumors with high proliferative activity. Relatively few endocrine tumors have been studied with FDG-PET, but, in general, the results support this concept. As shown in Table 2Go, a review of the literature shows that regardless of the pathological type of tumor, increased uptake of FDG is most likely in less well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors with high proliferative activity (4, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36). By contrast, FDG-PET seems to work less well to identify tumors with low proliferative activity (30, 31).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Review of scintigraphic imaging of selected neuroendocrine tumors

 
In our series, FDG-PET scans were true positive in six of 13 patients with histologically confirmed tumors and negative in four patients with occult tumors. FDG-PET did not reveal additional ACTH-secreting tumors beyond those identified by CT or MRI. The positive FDG-PET results in our patients could be the result of high tumor proliferative activity, as these were typically more aggressive tumors: neuroendocrine tumors, olfactory esthesioneuroblastoma, and small cell lung cancer (37, 38, 39, 40, 41). The negative FDG scans could be attributed to less aggressive tumor variants (all pulmonary carcinoids) or to a form of tumoral hibernation. Both mechanisms have been proposed to explain negative FDG-PET scans in patients with metastatic carcinoid (32).

In contrast to the importance of proliferation for FDG-PET uptake, OCT images depend on the presence of somatostatin receptors. Somatostatin receptors (subtypes 1–5) have been identified on many cells of neuroendocrine origin (42). OCT, the currently available radiolabeled somatostatin analog for scintigraphic imaging, binds with high affinity to somatostatin receptors 2 and 5. These receptor subtypes are predominantly expressed in primary gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (gastrinomas, insulinomas, and carcinoid tumors) (43), lung tumors (typical and atypical carcinoids, neuroendocrine carcinomas, and small cell lung cancer) (15), and their metastases (44). Thus, visualization of these tumor types would be likely (30, 31, 32, 33, 36). Nevertheless, pulmonary carcinoids (particularly atypical ones) and pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors may show heterogeneity in the degree of expression of somatostatin receptors (45, 46).

One of the factors that determines whether a tumor can be imaged with OCT is the density of somatostatin receptors expressed in the tumor (47). Other factors implicated are tumor size, the type of receptors expressed, the affinity of radioligand for the subtype of receptors expressed by the tumor, the efficiency of receptor subtype-mediated binding and internalization of radioligand, the trapping of radioisotopes within the tumor cells, and the mass of the injected radiopharmaceutical (47).

In previous studies, various levels of success with L-OCT scintigraphy have been reported, perhaps reflecting differences in patient referral patterns or study methodology. In a retrospective, unblinded series of 10 patients with EAS, an ACTH-secreting tumor was visualized with L-OCT in eight patients and was missed in two patients (12). In a more recent retrospective, unblinded report of patients with EAS, L-OCT examinations were positive in two of two patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma and six of six patients with histologically proven ACTH-secreting pulmonary carcinoids (11). Of the latter group, three of six L-OCT were initially negative, becoming positive on follow-up 8–27 months later. In contrast, in an earlier retrospective series of 18 patients assessed at the NIH, no ACTH-secreting tumor was detected by L-OCT when CT/MRI were negative, and seven L-OCT results were falsely positive (9). As in the present study, interpretation of octreoscans, but not CT or MRI, was blinded. In another study, L-OCT (as well as CT and/or MRI) was positive in four of 12 patients with CS due to EAS; one patient had a false positive L-OCT, and three patients had true positive CT and/or MRI, but negative L-OCT studies (10).

The present prospective study, using blinded readers for interpretation of scintigraphic studies, but not CT or MRI, found that conventional L-OCT worked as well as CT and better than MRI to visualize ACTH-secreting tumors, and H-OCT identified a tumor that was not seen with any other modality in one patient. Importantly, L-OCT indicated involvement of lymph nodes that was missed by CT, MRI, and FDG-PET in two patients (no. 2 and 3). In another patient (no. 9), L-OCT identified two abdominal lesions missed by CT, MRI, and FDG-PET, one of which was the primary ileal neuroendocrine tumor. Thus, L-OCT appears to complement CT and MRI, providing additional diagnostic accuracy. Its lack of false positive results in the current study implies that this problem may not be as great as previously suggested and also shows how its specificity can aid in the interpretation of anatomical imaging findings.

As OCT uptake is dependent on the presence of somatostatin receptors, we hypothesized that a larger dose of radionuclide might improve its absolute uptake by small or somatostatin receptor-poor tumors. This hypothesis was supported by a report in which 48% of patients receiving H-OCT for therapy had lesions detected on their posttherapy scans that were not seen on their diagnostic scans (18). In the same report, posttherapy scans provided better count statistics and enabled delayed imaging with improved background clearance (18). More recently, Verhaegen et al. (48) reported a number of patients in whom posttherapy scans (200–270 mCi) also showed more lesions than diagnostic scans, although in some patients, fewer lesions were seen on the posttherapy planar imaging scans. Although the number of lesions detected after very high doses was not significantly different from that using diagnostic doses, posttherapy scans revealed some previously undetected lesions (48).

Lending further credence to the rationale of H-OCT, studies in the literature have not shown reduced imaging quality at octreotide mass doses up to 120 µg (49). Consequently, we did not anticipate that the increased mass dose of octreotide used for H-OCT compared with L-OCT (30 vs. 10 µg) would lead to saturation of tumor receptor sites.

In our patients, eight of nine patients with negative initial L-OCT had subsequent H-OCT that was also negative. However, one patient with a negative L-OCT study (and negative CT/MRI) had a positive H-OCT study that led to resection of an intrathoracic, ACTH-secreting tumor. Thus, H-OCT may be justified in the evaluation of patients with ectopic ACTH secretion when CT, MRI, and L-OCT are negative.

This study is limited by its small size, a result of the rarity of EAS. Thus, we studied only pulmonary carcinoids, neuroendocrine tumors, small cell lung cancer, pheochromocytoma, and olfactory esthesioneuroblastoma. Because of the small sample size, differences in sensitivity of the various modalities may not represent the results for all patients with EAS. Because other tumor types or larger groups may have different rates of detection, there is a need for studies of more patients.

Recently, other groups have published promising results for the detection of neuroendocrine tumors using other PET ligands, specifically [11C]5-hydroxytryptophan ([11C]5-HTP), 5-[11C]dihydroxyphenyl-L-alanine ([11C]DOPA), [11C]harmine, and 6-[18F]fluorodopamine (50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55). Neuroendocrine tumors, such as foregut carcinoids, have been classified as APUDomas based on the demonstration of amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation. In particular, tryptophan is taken up and 5-hydroxylated to 5-HTP. Eriksson and colleagues (50) demonstrated that [11C]5-HTP PET identified tumors in three of five patients with ACTH-producing foregut carcinoids. In two other studies, including 22 patients with fore-, mid-, and hindgut carcinoids and three with endocrine pancreatic tumors, all tumors had radionuclide uptake after [11C]5-HTP-PET (51, 53). In another study of patients with pancreatic endocrine tumors, 11 of 16 patients had tumor uptake after [11C]DOPA-PET, and the images after [11C]5-HTP-PET correlated well with those after [11C]DOPA-PET (52). PET with the ligand [11C]harmine visualized all neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors in 11 patients in another study (54). Norepinephrine transporter systems are present in medullary thyroid cancer, and a metastatic medullary thyroid cancer lesion was detected with 6-[18F]fluorodopamine (55). Thus, all of these ligands deserve further investigation in patients with ectopic ACTH secretion.

In conclusion, FDG-PET is inferior to CT/MRI and does not detect additional ACTH-secreting tumors causing CS. Because hyperplastic adrenal glands may show FDG-PET and/or OCT uptake, an adrenal ACTH-secreting lesion may be obscured. Nevertheless, in this study L-OCT detected ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors as well as CT and better than MRI and seems to be a useful complementary modality to them. Moreover, when CT/MRI results are questionable or equivocal, a positive L-OCT scan might guide the clinician to review those images at a specific location or to repeat them with thinner sections to correctly localize the ACTH-secreting lesion. Finally, H-OCT may be useful in patients with EAS in whom CT, MRI, and L-OCT are negative, because it may occasionally localize the tumor. These modalities are complementary: a single positive study may represent a falsely positive result, whereas the presence of more than one positive study may confirm a true lesion. Thus, we recommend that CT, MRI, and L-OCT be used to screen for tumors. To reduce costs, initial studies might be performed with only two modalities, followed by the third if a tumor is not identified clearly. H-OCT may be performed only when other imaging modalities fail to identify the ACTH-secreting tumor.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: CS, Cushing’s syndrome; CT, computed tomography; DTPA, diethylenetriaminepentaacetate; EAS, ectopic ACTH secretion; FDG, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose; H-OCT, higher than standard dose of OCT; 5-HTP, hydroxytryptophan; L-DOPA, L-dihydroxyphenylalanine; L-OCT, standard dose of OCT; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; OCT, [111In]-DTPA-D-Phe-pentetreotide; PET, positron emission tomography; SPECT, single photon emission computed tomography; TE, echo time; TR, repetition time.

Received October 17, 2003.

Accepted February 9, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Doppman JL, Nieman L, Miller DL, Pass HI, Chang R, Cutler Jr GB, Schaaf M, Chrousos GP, Norton JA, Ziessman HA 1989 Ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome: localization studies in 28 patients. Radiology 172:115–124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Jones T 1996 The imaging science of positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 23:807–813[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Anderson H, Price P 2000 What does positron emission tomography offer oncology? Eur J Cancer 36:2028–2035
  4. Adams S, Baum R, Rink T, Schumm-Drager PM, Usadel KH, Hor G 1998 Limited value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the imaging of neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 25:79–83[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Eriksson B, Bergstrom M, Orlefors H, Sundin A, Oberg K, Langstrom B 2000 Use of PET in neuroendocrine tumors. In vivo applications and in vitro studies. Q J Nucl Med 44:68–76[Medline]
  6. Nakamoto Y, Higashi T, Sakahara H, Tamaki N, Itoh K, Imamura M, Konishi J 2000 Evaluation of pancreatic islet cell tumors by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: comparison with other modalities. Clin Nucl Med 25:115–119[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Phlipponneau M, Nocaudie M, Epelbaum J, De Keyzer Y, Lalau JD, Marchandise X, Bertagna X 1994 Somatostatin analogs for the localization and preoperative treatment of an adrenocorticotropin-secreting bronchial carcinoid tumor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:20–24[Abstract]
  8. de Herder WW, Lamberts SW 1996 Is there a role for somatostatin and its analogs in Cushing’s syndrome? Metabolism 45:83–85[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Torpy DJ, Chen CC, Mullen N, Doppman JL, Carrasquillo JA, Chrousos GP, Nieman LK 1999 Lack of utility of 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy in localizing ectopic ACTH producing tumors: follow-up of 18 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1186–1192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Tabarin A, Valli N, Chanson P, Bachelot Y, Rohmer V, Bex-Bachellerie V, Catargi B, Roger P, Laurent F 1999 Usefulness of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in patients with occult ectopic adrenocorticotropin syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1193–1202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Tsagarakis S, Christoforaki M, Giannopoulou H, Rondogianni F, Housianakou I, Malagari C, Rontogianni D, Bellenis I, Thalassinos N 2003 A reappraisal of the utility of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in patients with ectopic adrenocorticotropin Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:4754–4758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. de Herder WW, Krenning EP, Malchoff CD, Hofland LJ, Reubi JC, Kwekkeboom DJ, Oei HY, Pols HA, Bruining HA, Nobels FR 1994 Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy: its value in tumor localization in patients with Cushing’s syndrome caused by ectopic corticotropin or corticotropin-releasing hormone secretion. Am J Med 96:305–312[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kwekkeboom DJ, Krenning EP, Bakker WH, Oei HY, Kooij PP, Lamberts SW 1993 Somatostatin analogue scintigraphy in carcinoid tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 20:283–292[Medline]
  14. Hammond PJ, Jackson JA, Bloom SR 1994 Localization of pancreatic endocrine tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 40:3–14[Medline]
  15. Papotti M, Croce S, Bello M, Bongiovanni M, Allia E, Schindler M, Bussolati G 2001 Expression of somatostatin receptor types 2, 3 and 5 in biopsies and surgical specimens of human lung tumours. Correlation with preoperative octreotide scintigraphy. Virchows Arch 439:787–797[Medline]
  16. Adams S, Baum RP, Hertel A, Schumm-Draeger PM, Usadel KH, Hor G 1998 Comparison of metabolic and receptor imaging in recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma with histopathological findings. Eur J Nucl Med 25:1277–1283[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Baudin E, Lumbroso J, Schlumberger M, Leclere J, Giammarile F, Gardet P, Roche A, Travagli JP, Parmentier C 1996 Comparison of octreotide scintigraphy and conventional imaging in medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med 37:912–916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. McCarthy KE, Espenan GD, Cronin M, Anthony LB, Woltering EA 1998 Visualization of somatostatin receptor-positive lesions with 111-In-pentetreotide is dose dependent. Dig Dis Sci 43:1876
  19. Doppman JL, Oldfield E, Krudy AG, Chrousos GP, Schulte HM, Schaaf M, Loriaux DL 1984 Petrosal sinus sampling for Cushing syndrome: anatomical and technical considerations. Work in progress. Radiology 150:99–103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Nieman LK, Oldfield EH, Wesley R, Chrousos GP, Loriaux DL, Cutler Jr GB 1993 A simplified morning ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation test for the differential diagnosis of adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1308–1312.[Abstract]
  21. Dichek HL, Nieman LK, Oldfield EH, Pass HI, Malley JD, Cutler Jr GB 1994 A comparison of the standard high dose dexamethasone suppression test and the overnight 8-mg dexamethasone suppression test for the differential diagnosis of adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:418–422[Abstract]
  22. Hamacher K, Coenen HH, Stocklin G 1986 Efficient stereospecific synthesis of no-carrier-added 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose using aminopolyether supported nucleophilic substitution. J Nucl Med 27:235–238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ilias I, Nieman LK Cushing syndrome due to ectopic ACTH secretion: two decades’ experience at a single center. Program of the 84th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, San Francisco, CA, 2002, p 131
  24. Coleman RE 2002 Is quantitation necessary for oncological PET studies? For. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29:133–135[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Graham MM 2002 Is quantitation necessary for oncological PET studies? Against. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29:135–138[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Pinsky LE, Wipf JE, Ramsey SD 2000 Evidence-based medicine glossary. In: Ramsey SD, ed. Evidence-based clinical practice: concepts and approaches. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 165–172
  27. Seregni E, Chiti A, Bombardieri E 1998 Radionuclide imaging of neuroendocrine tumours: biological basis and diagnostic results. Eur J Nucl Med 25:639–658[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Lee CS 1996 Differences in cell proliferation and prognostic significance of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki-67 antigen immunoreactivity in in situ and invasive carcinomas of the extrahepatic biliary tract. Cancer 78:1881–1887[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Erasmus JJ, McAdams HP, Patz Jr EF, Coleman RE, Ahuja V, Goodman PC 1998 Evaluation of primary pulmonary carcinoid tumors using FDG PET. Am J Roentgenol 170:1369–1373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Adams S, Baum RP, Hertel A, Schumm-Drager PM, Usadel KH, Hor G 1998 Metabolic (PET) and receptor (SPET) imaging of well- and less well-differentiated tumours: comparison with the expression of the Ki-67 antigen. Nucl Med Commun 19:641–647[Medline]
  31. Pasquali C, Rubello D, Sperti C, Gasparoni P, Liessi G, Chierichetti F, Ferlin G, Pedrazzoli S 1998 Neuroendocrine tumor imaging: can 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography detect tumors with poor prognosis and aggressive behavior? World J Surg 22:588–592[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Le Rest C, Bomanji JB, Costa DC, Townsend CE, Visvikis D, Ell PJ 2001 Functional imaging of malignant paragangliomas and carcinoid tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 28:478–482[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Grunwald F, Schomburg A, Bender H, Klemm E, Menzel C, Bultmann T, Palmedo H, Ruhlmann J, Kozak B, Biersack HJ 1996 Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 23:312–319[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Wang W, Larson SM, Fazzari M, Tickoo SK, Kolbert K, Sgouros G, Yeung H, Macapinlac H, Rosai J, Robbins RJ 2000 Prognostic value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic scanning in patients with thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1107–1113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. McDougall IR, Davidson J, Segall GM 2001 Positron emission tomography of the thyroid, with an emphasis on thyroid cancer. Nucl Med Commun 22:485–492[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Belhocine T, Foidart J, Rigo P, Najjar F, Thiry A, Quatresooz P, Hustinx R 2002 Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy for diagnosing and staging carcinoid tumors: correlations with the pathological indexes p53 and Ki-67. Nucl Med Commun 23:727–734[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Ma PC, Blaszkowsky L, Bharti A, Ladanyi A, Kraeft SK, Bruno A, Skarin AT, Chen LB, Salgia R 2003 Circulating tumor cells and serum tumor biomarkers in small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 23:49–62[Medline]
  38. Koutsami MK, Doussis-Anagnostopoulou I, Papavassiliou AG, Gorgoulis VG 2002 Genetic and molecular coordinates of neuroendocrine lung tumors, with emphasis on small-cell lung carcinomas. Mol Med 8:419–436[Medline]
  39. Corleto VD, Delle FG, Jensen RT 2002 Molecular insights into gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours: importance and recent advances. Dig Liver Dis 34:668–680[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Pelley RJ, Bukowski RM 1999 Recent advances in systemic therapy for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Curr Opin Oncol 11:32–37[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Kairemo KJ, Jekunen AP, Kestila MS, Ramsay HA 1998 Imaging of olfactory neuroblastoma: an analysis of 17 cases. Auris Nasus Larynx 25:173–179[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Breeman WA, de Jong M, Kwekkeboom DJ, Valkema R, Bakker WH, Kooij PP, Visser TJ, Krenning EP 2001 Somatostatin receptor-mediated imaging and therapy: basic science, current knowledge, limitations and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med 28:1421–1429[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Wulbrand U, Wied M, Zofel P, Goke B, Arnold R, Fehmann H 1998 Growth factor receptor expression in human gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Clin Invest 28:1038–1049[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. de Herder WW, Lamberts SW 2002 Somatostatin and somatostatin analogues: diagnostic and therapeutic uses. Curr Opin Oncol 14:53–57[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Reubi JC, Kvols L, Krenning E, Lamberts SW 1991 In vitro and in vivo detection of somatostatin receptors in human malignant tissues. Acta Oncol 30:463–468[Medline]
  46. Warren WH, Memoli VA, Gould VE 1984 Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis of bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms. I. Carcinoids. Ultrastruct Pathol 6:15–27[Medline]
  47. Hofland LJ, Lamberts SW 2003 The pathophysiological consequences of somatostatin receptor internalization and resistance. Endocr Rev 24:28–47[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Verhaegen MJA, Valkema R, Kwekkeboom DJ, Oei HY, Esser JP, Krenning EP 2003 Is diagnostic standard-dose In-111-octreotide scintigraphy adequate to detect all tumor lesions in patients with somatostatin receptor positive tumors? Eur J Nucl Med 30:S 284.
  49. Kooij PPM, Kwekkeboom DJ, Breeman WAP, Reijs AEM, Bakker WH, Lamberts SW, Visser TJ, Krenning EP 1994 The effects of specific activity on tissue distribution of [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]octreotide in humans. J Nucl Med 35:226P
  50. Eriksson B, Bergstrom M, Sundin A, Juhlin C, Orlefors H, Oberg K, Langstrom B 2002 The role of PET in localization of neuroendocrine and adrenocortical tumors. Ann NY Acad Sci 970:159–169[Medline]
  51. Eriksson B, Bergstrom M, Lilja A, Ahlstrom H, Langstrom B, Oberg K 1993 Positron emission tomography (PET) in neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumors. Acta Oncol 32:189–196[Medline]
  52. Ahlstrom H, Eriksson B, Bergstrom M, Bjurling P, Langstrom B, Oberg K 1995 Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: diagnosis with PET. Radiology 195:333–337[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Orlefors H, Sundin A, Ahlstrom H, Bjurling P, Bergstrom M, Lilja A, Langstrom B, Oberg K, Eriksson B 1998 Positron emission tomography with 5-hydroxytryprophan in neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Oncol 16:2534–2541[Abstract]
  54. Orlefors H, Sundin A, Fasth KJ, Oberg K, Langstrom B, Eriksson B, Bergstrom M 2003 Demonstration of high monoaminoxidase-A levels in neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors in vitro and in vivo-tumor visualization using positron emission tomography with 11C-harmine. Nucl Med Biol 30:669–679[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Gourgiotis L, Sarlis NJ, Reynolds JC, VanWaes C, Merino MJ, Pacak K 2003 Localization of medullary thyroid carcinoma metastasis in a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A patient by 6-[18F]-fluorodopamine positron emission tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:637–641[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Boscaro and G. Arnaldi
Approach to the Patient with Possible Cushing's Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2009; 94(9): 3121 - 3131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
S. Kauhanen, M. Seppanen, J. Ovaska, H. Minn, J. Bergman, P. Korsoff, P. Salmela, J. Saltevo, T. Sane, M. Valimaki, et al.
The clinical value of [18F]fluoro-dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography in primary diagnosis, staging, and restaging of neuroendocrine tumors
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2009; 16(1): 255 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
J R Meinardi, B H R Wolffenbuttel, and R P F Dullaart
Cyclic Cushing's syndrome: a clinical challenge
Eur. J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 157(3): 245 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
L. R. Salgado, M. C. B V. Fragoso, M. Knoepfelmacher, M. C. Machado, S. Domenice, M. A. A. Pereira, and B. B. de Mendonca
Ectopic ACTH syndrome: our experience with 25 cases.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 155(5): 725 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. W. Findling and H. Raff
Cushing's Syndrome: Important Issues in Diagnosis and Management
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3746 - 3753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Waintrop, F. Tenenbaum, J. Coulot, O. Vignaux, C. Blanchet, P. Legmann, B. Richard, and X. Bertagna
IMAGE IN ENDOCRINOLOGY: Localization of an Occult Adrenocorticotropin-Secreting Carcinoid Tumor with Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy Using Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomographic Image Scanning
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2006; 91(9): 3271 - 3272.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
I. Ilias, D. J. Torpy, K. Pacak, N. Mullen, R. A. Wesley, and L. K. Nieman
Cushing's Syndrome Due to Ectopic Corticotropin Secretion: Twenty Years' Experience at the National Institutes of Health
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4955 - 4962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Orlefors, A. Sundin, U. Garske, C. Juhlin, K. Oberg, B. Skogseid, B. Langstrom, M. Bergstrom, and B. Eriksson
Whole-Body 11C-5-Hydroxytryptophan Positron Emission Tomography as a Universal Imaging Technique for Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison with Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy and Computed Tomography
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3392 - 3400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pacak, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nieman, L. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pacak, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nieman, L. K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals