| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, United Kingdom
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Professor A. B. Atkinson, Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom, BT12 6BA. E-mail: ab.atkinson{at}royalhospitals.n-i.nhs.uk.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Forty-one patients (21 male and 20 female; median age, 52 yr; range, 2373 yr) who had undergone pituitary surgery were studied (Cushings disease excluded). Twenty-two of the 41 patients had normal cortisol responses to all tests both at 1 and 46 wk after surgery. Eight patients had subnormal cortisol responses to all tests. Of the 11 patients with discrepant results, seven had subnormal responses only after the low-dose corticotropin test; the remaining four patients had borderline responses to one or more tests. At 46 wk after surgery, subjects with a 30-min serum cortisol after standard-dose corticotropin of less than 350 nmol/liter (12.7 µg/dl) consistently had a subnormal response to hypoglycemia, and those with a serum cortisol greater than 650 nmol/liter (23.6 µg/dl) had a normal response to hypoglycemia.
Definitive testing of the HPA axis using the standard-dose corticotropin test can be carried out provided it is performed at least 4 wk after pituitary surgery. A 30-min cortisol level greater than 650 nmol/liter (23.6 µg/dl) indicates adequacy of the HPA axis, and a level of less than 350 nmol/liter (12.7 µg/dl) indicates ACTH deficiency. No further testing is then required. An intermediate level of 350650 nmol/liter (12.723.6 µg/dl) warrants further assessment using the insulin hypoglycemia test.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The timing of HPA axis assessment is also important. Testing too early in the postoperative period may diagnose corticotropin deficiency, which turns out to be transient (8). Alternatively, corticotropin sufficiency may be erroneously identified if corticotropin testing is performed too early after sudden ACTH depletion. This is probably because insufficient time has elapsed for adrenal atrophy to occur (5, 8).
Ambiguity has also arisen in previous reports because of the heterogeneity of patient groups studied. Previous studies examining the function of the HPA axis have included not only patients with pituitary adenomas assessed in the months after pituitary surgery but also patients with pituitary adenomas many years after surgery, patients who received radiotherapy, still other patients with diverse pituitary pathology, and finally some patients without pituitary disease but receiving glucocorticoid therapy for other medical disorders (9, 10, 11, 12). We wished therefore to study a relatively homogeneous group of patients immediately after pituitary surgery and to compare the low- and standard-dose corticotropin tests performed 1 wk after surgery with repeat low- and standard-dose corticotropin tests in addition to an insulin hypoglycemia test performed at 46 wk postoperatively. We have previously compared the low- and standard-dose corticotropin tests at 1 wk with an insulin hypoglycemia test at 46 wk (5), but the present study allowed us to identify temporal changes in HPA axis function over the early postoperative period and, importantly, also to evaluate the optimal means of assessing HPA axis function after surgery.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Each patient had a low-dose (1 µg) corticotropin test on d 6 after pituitary surgery and a standard-dose (250 µg) corticotropin test on d 7. Replacement hydrocortisone was omitted for 24 h before each test. These 1-wk data have been reported elsewhere (5).
The low-dose corticotropin test was performed by administering 1 µg corticotropin iv at 0900 h after a basal serum cortisol measurement. Corticotropin (Synacthen 250 µg, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Surrey, UK) was diluted in sterile 0.9% normal saline solution to a concentration of 1 µg/ml and injected immediately. Samples for serum cortisol were obtained at 30 and 60 min after injection.
Similarly, after basal sampling, the standard-dose corticotropin test was performed by administering corticotropin, 250 µg im, with samples for serum cortisol being taken 30 and 60 min later.
If the 0900 h serum cortisol 1 wk after surgery was greater than 250 nmol/liter (9.1 µg/dl), then replacement hydrocortisone was discontinued and patients were instructed to recommence hydrocortisone at double dose (30 mg at 0900 h and 10 mg at 1700 h) should they become unwell in the interim. None of our patient cohort had to do this.
All patients were readmitted 46 wk after surgery for additional testing. This included repeat low- and standard-dose corticotropin tests carried out as outlined above. In addition, an insulin hypoglycemia test was performed. After an overnight fast, an iv cannula was inserted into a forearm vein at 0900 h and soluble insulin (Humulin S, Lilly, Basingstoke, UK), 0.15 U/kg, administered iv at 0930 h. For those patients with acromegaly or suspected insulin resistance, 0.2 U/kg was given, and 0.1 U/kg to those patients in whom hypoadrenalism was thought probable. Peripheral venous blood was sampled at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 min for glucose and cortisol. In those subjects still taking replacement corticosteroids, these were omitted for 24 h before each test, the total daily dose being given as a single dose immediately after the performance of low- and standard-dose corticotropin tests.
The basal cortisol level reported at 46 wk after surgery was determined as the mean value of the 0900 h serum cortisol measurements taken before the low-dose and standard-dose corticotropin tests.
A lower limit of a normal cortisol response to both low- and standard-dose corticotropin had been determined previously in our center after performance of these tests in 16 normal volunteers. The mean - 2 SD (logarithmic transformation) 30-min serum cortisol value was 496 nmol/liter for the low-dose corticotropin test and 504 nmol/liter for the standard-dose corticotropin test, resulting in our use of a cutoff value of 500 nmol/liter (18.1 µg/dl) for both tests (5). We used a cortisol response to hypoglycemia of 550 nmol/liter (19.9 µg/dl) as indicative of a normal response, provided symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose
2.0 mmol/liter) was achieved (2).
Serum cortisol was measured by RIA, using the Diagnostic Products Corp. (Caernarfon, UK) Coat-a-Count method. It has an established interassay coefficient of variation at all levels of less than 5%.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.0 mmol/liter) in response to insulin administration with none experiencing any adverse effects.
Twenty-two patients had a normal cortisol response to both low- and standard-dose corticotropin tests 1 wk after surgery and a normal cortisol response to both corticotropin tests and the insulin hypoglycemia test 46 wk after surgery. Eight patients had subnormal cortisol responses to all tests both at 1 week and 46 wk after surgery. The responses of the individual patients who had subnormal and discrepant responses are shown in Table 1
.
|
|
|
One patient (F) had a subnormal response to low-dose corticotropin at both 1 and 46 wk after surgery, with normal responses to both standard-dose corticotropin tests and the insulin hypoglycemia test.
Two patients (G and H) had normal cortisol responses to all tests except for an isolated subnormal response to low-dose corticotropin at 46 wk.
One patient (I) had subnormal responses to both low-dose corticotropin tests and to the 4- to 6-wk standard-dose corticotropin test but a normal 1-wk standard-dose corticotropin and a normal insulin hypoglycemia test response.
Two patients (J and K) had normal responses to low- and standard-dose corticotropin tests both at 1 and 46 wk yet had subnormal cortisol responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia.
Mean basal serum cortisol levels 46 wk after surgery did not discriminate between those with normal, subnormal, and discrepant cortisol responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia and corticotropin (Fig. 3
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
It has been claimed that the use of a lower dose of corticotropin improves the sensitivity of the corticotropin test (4, 10), although any potential advantages remain controversial (7). Taking the insulin hypoglycemia test as the gold standard, in our study, the 4- to 6-wk low-dose corticotropin test had a sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 86.7% to detect hypocortisolism. The 30-min cortisol response to low-dose corticotropin at 46 wk correlated with the peak cortisol response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia, although this conceals individual discrepancies (Fig. 1
). However, the clinical consequence, if any, of a subnormal low-dose corticotropin response in a patient with a normal response to hypoglycemia remains unclear. In our series, the low-dose corticotropin test did not give any additional information that influenced clinical decision making, either at 1 wk after surgery as we previously reported (5) or at 46 wk after surgery. Therefore, we do not believe its further use in this setting is warranted.
In this study, the standard-dose corticotropin test had a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 100% to detect hypocortisolism 46 wk after pituitary surgery. Despite a correlation between the 30-min cortisol response to standard-dose corticotropin and the peak cortisol response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia (Fig. 2
), discrepancies exist between the tests in the region around the lower cutoff values. It is of vital importance that, in patients in whom secondary adrenal insufficiency may be present, the correct decision regarding corticosteroid replacement is made. Our results confirm, therefore, that the standard-dose corticotropin test at 6 wk after surgery is accurate in identifying those patients both with moderate to severe secondary adrenal insufficiency and also those with adequate HPA axis function. In those patients with milder ACTH deficiency, concern remains that potentially serious adrenal insufficiency is masked by a normal cortisol response to corticotropin.
In an attempt to improve concordance between the standard-dose corticotropin test and the insulin hypoglycemia test, various lower cutoff levels for the standard-dose corticotropin test have been proposed (9, 10). However, because of uncertainty with regard to the cortisol response in the context of partial ACTH deficiency, it would seem more appropriate to view a borderline 30-min cortisol response to corticotropin 46 wk after surgery in the region close to the lower cutoff level as unreliable and to proceed to further assessment. Subjects therefore with a 30-min serum cortisol between 350 and 650 nmol/liter (12.723.6 µg/dl) require further assessment. It should be noted that these responses to standard-dose corticotropin are threshold values to assess HPA axis activity after pituitary surgery and thus are not relevant to the establishment of normal cortisol responses in control subjects.
In summary, based on a homogeneous cohort of patients, we have established guidelines for determining the adequacy of the HPA axis after surgery, allowing appropriate decisions to be made regarding glucocorticoid replacement therapy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviation: HPA, Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal.
Received September 9, 2003.
Accepted January 13, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Agha, J. W. Tomlinson, P. M. Clark, G. Holder, and P. M. Stewart The Long-Term Predictive Accuracy of the Short Synacthen (Corticotropin) Stimulation Test for Assessment of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2006; 91(1): 43 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Padfield, J. R. Seckl, B. R. Walker, and H. K. Gleeson Letter re: HPA Axis Testing after Pituitary Surgery J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4981 - 4982. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |