help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Randolph, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Little, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Randolph, J. F., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Little, R. J.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 89, No. 4 1555-1561
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

Change in Estradiol and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone across the Early Menopausal Transition: Effects of Ethnicity and Age

John F. Randolph, Jr., MaryFran Sowers, Irina V. Bondarenko, Siobán D. Harlow, Judith L. Luborsky and Roderick J. Little

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine (J.F.R.), and Departments of Epidemiology (MF.S., I.V.B., S.D.H.) and Biostatistics (R.J.L.), School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (J.L.L.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: John F. Randolph, Jr., M.D., L4228 Women’s Hospital, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0276. E-mail: jfrandol{at}med.umich.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Serum reproductive hormone concentrations were measured longitudinally in a community-based, multiethnic population of midlife women to assess whether ethnic differences exist in the patterns of change in estradiol (E2) and FSH and, if so, whether these differences are explained by host characteristics. We studied 3257 participants from seven clinical sites in the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) who were aged 42–52 yr at baseline and self-identified as African American (28.2%), Caucasian (47.1%), Chinese (7.7%), Hispanic (8.4%), or Japanese (8.6%). E2 and FSH were assayed in serum collected primarily in the early follicular phase of a spontaneous menstrual cycle in three consecutive annual visits. The primary explanatory variables included in repeated-measures regression analyses were race/ethnicity, menopausal status, age, body mass index (BMI), day of the cycle, smoking, parity, socioeconomic status, study site, and the self-report of diabetes at baseline.

At the baseline visit, 46.2% of the women were classified as being early perimenopausal, with the remaining being premenopausal. By the second follow-up visit, 5.5% of the women in that cohort were postmenopausal, 66.8% were early perimenopausal, 8.3% were late perimenopausal, and 19.4% remained premenopausal.

Serum E2 concentrations decreased significantly with age, with a steeper decline at higher ages. FSH concentrations increased significantly with age, with a steeper increase at higher ages. Similar patterns in the decline of E2 and the increase in FSH with age were found across ethnic groups, but the levels of these hormones differed by race/ethnicity. Specifically, over time, Chinese and Japanese women had lower E2 concentrations but similar FSH levels, compared with Caucasian women, and African American women had higher FSH concentrations but comparable E2 levels with those of Caucasian women. These ethnic differences in E2 and FSH were independent of menopausal status. The effect of BMI on serum E2 and FSH levels varied by menopausal status. Increasing BMI was associated with decreasing concentrations of E2 among premenopausal and early perimenopausal women but was associated with increasing concentrations of E2 among late perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Increasing BMI was associated with decreasing concentrations of FSH, with the effect of BMI becoming larger as women transitioned through menopause.

We conclude that serum E2 levels decrease and FSH concentrations increase with increasing age in midlife women, that ethnic differences in E2 over time differ from ethnic differences in FSH and suggest ethnic differences in the pituitary-ovarian relationship, and that the effect of BMI on E2 and FSH concentrations varies by menopausal status.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
REPRODUCTIVE AGING IS endocrinologically characterized by a progressive rise in serum FSH levels associated with a decrease in serum estradiol (E2) levels (1). The rise in FSH is associated with reduced levels of ovarian steroid and peptide negative feedback regulators of FSH secretion (2). This monotropic FSH rise, a cardinal endocrine feature of the perimenopause, was first described by Sherman and Korenman in 1975 (3), confirmed in subsequent epidemiological cohort studies (4, 5, 6) of the menopausal transition, and associated with a progressive loss of ovulatory function (7). No reports of the menopausal transition to date have suggested that the regulation of FSH secretion may vary by host characteristics (8, 9, 10, 11).

Few studies, whether cross-sectional (2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11) or longitudinal (1, 6, 9), have investigated ethnic differences in reproductive hormones in midlife women. Lower serum E2 concentrations have been observed in postmenopausal Chinese women than in postmenopausal Caucasian women (12). Likewise, lower levels of serum E2 (13) were observed in African-American women than in Caucasian women approaching menopause as well as differences in urinary gonadotropins and sex steroids (14). A cross-sectional analysis of baseline serum E2 and FSH concentrations in early perimenopausal women in the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) reported higher serum FSH levels in African American and Hispanic women compared with Caucasian women, but no ethnic differences in E2 levels after adjustment for BMI and other host characteristics (15). However, unadjusted E2 concentrations were significantly lower in Chinese women than Caucasian women despite comparable FSH levels and were still 13% lower in Chinese and Japanese women after adjustment for age and body size, although this difference was no longer statistically significant. FSH differences in ethnicities with comparable E2 concentrations, and possible E2 differences in ethnic groups with comparable FSH levels, suggest the possibility of ethnic differences in the pituitary-gonadal relationship during the menopausal transition. Moreover, other factors such as body mass index (BMI), age, and lifestyle factors have been associated with variations in serum concentrations of E2 and FSH in both longitudinal (1) and cross-sectional studies (12, 15) and may contribute to observed ethnic differences in reproductive hormone levels and patterns of change during the perimenopause.

SWAN is a longitudinal, multiethnic, multidisciplinary study of the natural history of the menopausal transition (16). Participants were recruited from five self-designated groups: African-American, Caucasian, Chinese, Japanese, and Hispanic women. The purpose of this report was to assess whether patterns of change in serum E2 and FSH concentrations with age differ by race/ethnicity in women traversing the menopausal transition. We also assess whether ethnic differences persist after accounting for individual host factors including BMI, menopausal status, socioeconomic status, parity, smoking, alcohol use, and an initial diagnosis of diabetes.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study population

SWAN is a multisite, longitudinal cohort study being conducted in community-based groups of women. At baseline, 3302 women who belonged to one of five ethnic/racial groups were recruited: Caucasian (n = 1550), African-American (n = 935), Japanese (n = 281), Chinese (n = 250), and Hispanic (n = 286). Eligibility criteria for entry into the SWAN longitudinal cohort were: age 42 to 52 yr; intact uterus and at least one ovary; no current use of estrogens or other medications known to affect ovarian function; at least one menstrual period in the 3 months before screening; and self-identification as a member of one of the five eligible ethnic groups. Cohort recruitment and enrollment have been described in detail (16). In brief, participants were enrolled at seven clinical sites in the following geographic areas: Boston, Massachusetts; Chicago, Illinois; Detroit, Michigan; Los Angeles, California; Hudson County, New Jersey; Oakland, California; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Recruitment techniques were designed to generate a community-based sample of women at each of the seven sites. Each site enrolled Caucasian women as well as women belonging to one prespecified minority ethnic group. African-American women were enrolled in Boston, Chicago, the Detroit area, and Pittsburgh, whereas Japanese, Chinese, and Hispanic women were enrolled in Los Angeles, Oakland, and Hudson County, New Jersey, respectively. Institutional review board approval was obtained at each study site.

This analysis includes data from 3257 women with a serum E2 or FSH value from at least one longitudinal visit: baseline, first annual follow-up, or second annual follow-up. Participants with reported hysterectomy, pregnancy, or hormone replacement therapy use in the course of the study were censored from analysis at the corresponding visit. Two observations with E2 levels greater than 1000 pg/ml were excluded from analysis.

Measures

Common assessment protocols were observed across the seven clinical sites, supported by a written manual of operations, common training, and standardization of research staff. Height (centimeters) and weight (kilograms) were measured using a stadiometer and calibrated scales. BMI was calculated as weight (kilograms)/height (meters)2. Age, educational achievement, difficulty in paying for basics, smoking history, parity, and the diagnosis of diabetes at the baseline visit were self-reported. Seven smoking questions were adapted from the American Thoracic Society standards (17). Cigarette smoking was categorized as never, former, or current smoker.

Menopausal status was based on self-report of decreased predictability in the time between menses in the prior 3 months (early perimenopausal) or no decreased predictability in the same time period (premenopausal), no menses for 3–11 months (late perimenopausal), or no menses for 12 or more months (postmenopausal) (18).

Phlebotomy was performed in the morning after an overnight fast. Women were scheduled for venipuncture on d 2–7 of a spontaneous menstrual cycle occurring within 60 d of recruitment at the baseline visit and annually thereafter. Two attempts were made to obtain the d 2–7 sample. If a timed sample could not be obtained, a random fasting sample was taken within a 90-d window. Blood was refrigerated 1–2 h after phlebotomy and then, after centrifugation, the serum was aliquotted, frozen, and batched for shipment to the central laboratory. At the central laboratory, samples were catalogued and assayed continuously upon arrival.

FSH assays were conducted in singlicate and E2 assays in duplicate using an ACS-180 automated analyzer (Bayer Diagnostics Corp., Norwood, MA). Serum E2 concentrations were measured with a modified, off-line ACS-180 (E2–6) immunoassay. Inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation averaged 10.6 and 6.4%, respectively, over the assay range (12.5% at < 10 pg/ml) and the lower limit of detection was 1 pg/ml with a cross-reactivity of less than 1% (19). Serum FSH concentrations were measured with a two-site chemiluminometric immunoassay using constant amounts of two monoclonal antibodies provided by Bayer Diagnostics. Each antibody is directed to different regions on the ß-subunit (one coupled to paramagnetic particles and the other labeled with dimethyl-acridinium ester) with specificity for intact FSH. Inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were 12.0 and 6.0%, respectively, and the lower limit of detection was 1.1 IU/liter.

Data analysis

We first used several exploratory techniques, including plots of individual profiles and smoothed average trends, to understand differences in age-related trends in hormone concentrations among relevant subpopulations and to identify possible interactions. We then used linear mixed models appropriate for repeated-measures data (SAS Proc Mixed, release 8.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC) to assess whether decreases in E2 and increases in FSH concentrations during the menopausal transition (ages 42–55 yr) were associated with ethnicity or BMI. In the regression analyses, serum E2 and FSH concentrations and BMI were logarithmically transformed to reduce skewedness, with values back-transformed to present the results.

Age 42 yr, the youngest age in the study population, was defined as the reference age and centered by subtracting 42 from each woman’s chronological age. A status variable was created combining information on a woman’s menopausal status (pre-, early peri-, late peri-, and postmenopausal) and whether phlebotomy was performed within d 2–7 of a spontaneous menstrual cycle (in/out the window). Models were run including ethnicity as a covariate and stratifying by ethnicity. A variable for site is included in all models as a covariate to account for sampling design.

The initial model included age and status. We evaluated potential interactions between status and age. Potential interactions between age and ethnicity were examined for the whole study population and within each site. Next, log (BMI) was added to the model as a time-varying covariate and interactions with menopausal status were evaluated. Finally, other potential confounders including smoking, diabetes, parity, alcohol intake within 24 h before the blood draw, and socioeconomic status were evaluated. Final models account for age-related changes in the variance of both E2 and FSH and for differences in the variance structure for hormones measured in and out the d 2–7 window. We assumed conditional independence of the residual covariance structure conditional on the random effects, as suggested by the scatter plot matrix and adequate model fit, as assessed by the Akaike information criteria.

We conducted two informal checks of the robustness of the estimates. First, we restricted the analysis to participants with all three observations available. Second, using the method and the macro suggested by Verbeke and Molenberghs (20), we excluded influential observations. In both cases, the resulting estimates were very close to the original estimates.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Host characteristics of this cohort of 3257 women are presented in Table 1Go. Notably, 10.9% had never been pregnant, 7.3% reported having diabetes at the baseline visit, 9.0% noted significant difficulty in paying for basic necessities, and 17.3% reported current smoking on at least one annual visit.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Selected baseline demographic characteristics of participants contributing data to analysis (N = 3257)

 
Menopausal status and mean serum E2 and FSH concentrations by study year are presented in Table 2Go. At the baseline visit, 46.2% of the women were classified as being early perimenopausal, with the remaining being premenopausal. By the second follow-up visit, 5.5% of the women in that cohort were postmenopausal, 66.7% were early perimenopausal, 8.4% were late perimenopausal, and 19.5% remained premenopausal. Both E2 and FSH concentrations were significantly higher in women who had phlebotomy outside the target window at all three visits. Consistently, E2 levels decreased over the three visits, whereas FSH concentrations increased, with the FSH increase being smaller for women assessed within the d 2–7 window than for women assessed outside of this window.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Status distributions and hormone concentrations at baseline and follow-up

 
Hormone concentrations by menopausal status for each visit are listed in Table 3Go. Consistent with the resulting longitudinal model, serum E2 concentrations within each status group declined with each visit in the overall cohort and when serum was obtained within the d 2–7 window. However, mean serum concentrations were higher at the follow-up visits than at baseline when serum was obtained outside the window. Serum FSH levels in the premenopausal and early perimenopausal groups in the entire cohort and when serum was obtained within the window increased minimally over the three visits and were lower at the first follow-up visit when serum was obtained outside the window. Serum FSH increased with each visit in the late perimenopause and postmenopause except in the group of late perimenopausal subjects able to have phlebotomy within the d 2–7 window. These may be compared with listed basal normal ranges for reproductive aged women of 20–60 pg/ml for E2 and 5–20 IU/liter for FSH (21).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Hormone concentrations by menopausal status at baseline and follow-up

 
Parameter estimates for the best-fitting longitudinal models of hormone levels are shown in Table 4Go. The fitted average serum concentrations of E2 and FSH over age and stratified by ethnicity are shown in Fig. 1Go, A and B, respectively. Note that the hormone values in these plots are not equally spaced because models were fitted on the logarithmic scale. Serum E2 concentrations decreased significantly with age, with a steeper decline at higher ages (Fig. 1AGo). FSH concentrations increased significantly with age, with a steeper slope at higher ages (Fig. 1BGo). We found similar patterns in the decline of E2 and the increase in FSH with age across ethnic groups, but the levels of these hormones differed by race/ethnicity. Specifically, both Chinese and Japanese women had lower E2 concentrations, compared with Caucasians, whereas E2 concentrations of African-American and Hispanic women did not differ from those in Caucasian women. In contrast, African-American women demonstrated higher FSH concentrations, compared with Caucasian women, whereas FSH concentrations of Chinese, Hispanic, and Japanese women did not differ from those of Caucasians. The decline of E2 concentration with age was greater for early and late perimenopausal women assayed outside the d 2–7 window than for premenopausal women with samples within the window. The increase in FSH concentrations with age was largest for early perimenopausal and late perimenopausal women.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Parameter estimates for the best fitting longitudinal models of hormone levels across the menopausal transition (ages 42–55 yr)

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. A and B, Fitted average hormone profiles by age, stratified by ethnicity. The FSH profiles for African-American, Chinese, and Hispanic women appear superimposed. Hormone levels were back-transformed and plotted on a logarithmic scale. Average profiles were plotted under the conditions that mean values of BMI, status, and other covariates included in the model had equal values across all ethnic groups throughout each year.

 
Increasing BMI was associated with decreasing concentrations of E2, as indicated in Table 4Go. When stratified by menopausal status, the effect of BMI on E2 was negative and did not differ between premenopausal and early perimenopausal women, but among late perimenopausal and postmenopausal women, increasing BMI was associated with increasing concentrations of E2. Increasing BMI was associated with decreasing concentrations of FSH, with the effect of BMI becoming more pronounced as women transitioned through menopause. Diabetes at baseline was negatively associated with FSH levels. Current smoking was positively associated with serum FSH concentrations. Parity, socioeconomic status, alcohol intake, and physical activity were not significantly associated with either E2 or FSH and were not included in the models.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study we found that the serum concentrations of the reproductive hormones E2 and FSH, when measured longitudinally over the early menopausal transition, vary by race/ethnicity independently of each other, suggesting ethnic-specific variation in the pituitary-ovarian relationship. We also found that E2 and FSH vary by ethnicity and age independently from menopausal status and that the effect of BMI on serum E2 and FSH levels varies by menopausal status. Specifically, Chinese and Japanese women had lower E2 concentrations than Caucasian women, despite comparable FSH levels, whereas African-American women had higher FSH concentrations than Caucasian women, despite comparable E2 levels. The E2 and FSH differences in ethnicity were not affected by menopausal status classification, and decreases in E2 and increases in FSH with age persisted even after controlling for the effects of progression through the different stages of the menopausal transition. These data extend the cross-sectional results from SWAN (15) by verifying ethnic differences in E2 and FSH after adjustment for confounding variables and reveal a status-dependent effect of BMI on E2 not demonstrated in the cross-sectional analysis.

The consistently lower E2 concentrations in both Chinese and Japanese women, compared with Caucasian women, in the absence of a comparable difference in serum FSH concentrations, suggests either a difference in the feedback regulation of the pituitary or an ethnic-specific difference in pituitary sensitivity to gonadal-negative feedback. Feedback differences potentially could arise from the greater exposure to dietary estrogens reported in Asian populations (22, 23, 24). Although we documented that, among these SWAN enrollees, intake of the isoflavones daidzein and genistein was 2 times greater in Japanese women than in Chinese women (25), the average E2 and FSH levels of Chinese and Japanese women were not different, suggesting that dose-dependent negative feedback is an insufficient explanation of these observations. It is also possible that there is an ethnic-specific difference in the secretion of a nonestrogen regulator such as inhibin B (26, 27, 28).

The SWAN finding that E2 concentrations in Asian women are about 20% lower than Caucasian women over the entire midlife age range is consistent with studies reporting lower serum E2 levels in postmenopausal Chinese women than in postmenopausal Caucasian women (12). This phenomenon may be related to observations of reduced symptom reporting in Asian women (22, 23, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33), which has also been reported among perimenopausal Chinese and Japanese women in SWAN (24). The differences in the ethnic differentials in the E2 and FSH concentrations raise the possibility that symptom differences could have a central origin associated with decreased pituitary sensitivity to negative feedback rather than an ovarian source.

Although the magnitude of the difference is much more modest, the higher serum FSH levels in African-American women, compared with Caucasian women, despite comparable E2 concentrations, also suggests potential ethnic-specific differences in pituitary-ovarian communication. This finding, with longitudinal data, supports the baseline cross-sectional observation (15). These higher FSH concentrations may be related to an earlier menopause in African-American women (34, 35, 36) reported in other studies; however, SWAN has observed too few final menstrual periods in African-American women to appropriately test this relationship. The absence of significant differences in FSH levels in Asian or Hispanic women, compared with Caucasian women, must be viewed as preliminary because the observed difference in African-American women is quite modest and the power to discern such small differences is more limited in the Asian groups whose cohort size is smaller than the African-American and Caucasian cohorts.

The difference in the effect of BMI on E2 concentration by menopausal status has not been previously reported in cross-sectional (2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 15) or longitudinal (1, 6, 9) studies. Ethnic differences in the relationship of BMI and reproductive hormones have been reported in cross-sectional studies (13, 14). For example, African-American but not Caucasian women had decreased levels of E2 with increasing BMI (13). Burger et al. (1) reported no significant BMI effect on E2 levels either as a function of age or with respect to a documented final menstrual period in what was the largest longitudinal study of the menopausal transition reported before the organization of SWAN. The failure to report this finding from the Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Study may have arisen because the age range of their enrollees was 45–55 yr, compared with 42–52 yr among the SWAN enrollees. Thus, SWAN may have been able to detect differences in the early perimenopausal period that would not have readily been apparent in the Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Study. Conversely, in SWAN the numbers of women classified as late perimenopausal (8.36%) or postmenopausal (5.48%) at the second follow-up visit are still relatively few and preclude undertaking a parallel retrospective analysis synchronized to the final menstrual period similar to the report from the Melbourne study. The shift in the BMI effect from early perimenopause to late perimenopause is statistically significant and consistent with a shift in estrogen metabolism associated with the decrease in ovarian E2 secretion at the menopausal transition. The decrease in FSH with increasing BMI is consistent with that observed in the baseline cross-sectional SWAN analysis (15) and with the retrospective analysis reported from the Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Study (1).

The effect of age independent of menopausal status for both E2 and FSH concentrations is consistent with the Melbourne study (1) and suggests that neither hormone is a pure marker of ovarian aging. The age effect on E2 within each status group was significant only in premenopausal and early perimenopausal women who had samples obtained outside the d 2–7 window, a not unexpected finding because these were heterogeneous groups composed of predominantly cycling women sampled later in the cycle when E2 levels are higher but more variable. The age effect on FSH was not linear and was positive within status groups for all but postmenopausal women, suggesting an upper limit on FSH levels independent of age or status.

The serum E2 concentrations in postmenopausal women were higher than previously reported (1, 5, 6, 9), although the numbers of women were relatively small, and the levels decreased by approximately 30% from the first to the second follow-up visit. This decrease is consistent with the continued decline reported in the Melbourne study until several years after the final menstrual period (1), particularly in this group of women who were still in the very early postmenopause. Higher E2 levels are also consistent with the age-related, status-independent decline reported here because the postmenopausal women are still relatively young, again consistent with the Melbourne data (1). This is the most likely reason that the mean E2 level at the first follow-up visit in the postmenopausal subjects was quite similar to the basal levels in the other status groups. We do not believe it is due to a difference in the E2 assay because the assay was validated against appropriate standards (19).

The impact of the timing of the phlebotomy within or outside the early follicular window was demonstrated in the variance functions for E2 and FSH and stratified by the timing of the serum sample and was a major factor in the final model. Women with cycles predictable enough to facilitate phlebotomy on d 2–7 are included in the within-window group, whose data demonstrated nearly stable variance over the entire 42–55 yr age range. However, the out-of-window group increasingly included late perimenopausal women with unpredictable menstrual bleeding, women who were postmenopausal, and women with irregular cycles as well as women for whom there was complicated scheduling. This group demonstrated peak variability of both E2 and FSH at about age 49 yr, which is 2–3 yr before the expected mean final menstrual period (34).

The higher serum FSH levels with current smoking is consistent with the SWAN baseline cross-sectional analysis (15) and studies linking current smoking with an earlier age at menopause (33, 34). The lower serum FSH concentrations in women who reported a diagnosis of diabetes at the baseline visit has not been reported previously, although both type 1 (37) and type 2 diabetes (38) have been associated with an earlier age at menopause. No other covariates investigated were significantly associated with either serum E2 or FSH levels.

It must be emphasized that this longitudinal analysis is limited to the first three annual measures in women still predominantly in the early menopausal transition. Moreover, relatively few women have recorded a confirmed final menstrual period to provide an anchor from which to retrospectively assess longitudinal changes.

We conclude that: 1) serum E2 concentrations are lower but serum FSH levels are not statistically different in Chinese and Japanese women, compared with Caucasian women, throughout the menopausal transition; 2) serum FSH concentrations are higher but serum E2 levels are similar in African-American women, compared with Caucasian women, throughout the menopausal transition; 3) serum E2 concentrations decrease and FSH concentrations increase with increasing age, independent of menopausal status during the menopausal transition; and 4) the effect of body size, as measured by BMI, on serum E2 and FSH concentrations differs by menopausal status.


    Footnotes
 
The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) was funded by the National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Nursing Research, and Office of Research on Women’s Health of the National Institutes of Health. Supplemental funding from the National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Child Health and Human Development, National Center on Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Office of Minority Health, and Office of AIDS Research is also gratefully acknowledged.

Clinical Centers: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (U01 NR04061, MaryFran Sowers, PI); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (U01 AG12531, Joel Finkelstein, PI); Rush University, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois (U01 AG12505, Lynda Powell, PI); University of California, Davis/Kaiser, California (U01 AG12554, Ellen Gold, PI); University of California, Los Angeles, California (U01 AG12539, Gail Greendale, PI); University of Medicine and Dentistry/New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey (U01 AG12535, Gerson Weiss, PI); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (U01 AG12546, Karen Matthews, PI).

Laboratory: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (U01 AG12495, Central Ligand Assay Satellite Services, Daniel McConnell, PI) and Medical Research Laboratories, Highland Heights, Kentucky (subcontract of U01 AG12553, Evan Stein, Director).

Coordinating Center: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Kim Sutton-Tyrrell, PI).

Project Officers: Janice Phillips, Sherry Sherman.

Steering Committee Chair: Susan Johnson.

Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; E2, estradiol; SWAN, Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation.

Received July 8, 2003.

Accepted December 23, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Burger H, Dudley E, Hopper J, Groome N, Guthrie J, Green A, Dennerstein L 1999 Prospectively measured levels of serum follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol and the dimeric inhibins during the menopausal transition in a population based cohort of women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:4025–4030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Santoro N, Brown J, Adel T, Skurnick J 1996 Characterization of reproductive hormonal dynamics in the perimenopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1495–1501[Abstract]
  3. Sherman BM, Korenman SG 1975 Hormonal characteristics of the human menstrual cycle throughout reproductive life. J Clin Invest 55:699–706
  4. Lenton EA, Sexton L, Lee S, Cooke ID 1988 Progressive changes in LH and FSH and LH:FSH ratio in women throughout reproductive life. Maturitas 10:35–43[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Longcope C, Franz C, Morello C, Baker R, Johnston Jr CC 1986 Steroid and gonadotropin levels in women during the peri-menopausal years. Maturitas 8:189–196[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Rannevik G, Jeppsson S, Johnell O, Bjerre B, Laurell-Borulf Y, Svanberg L 1995 A longitudinal study of the perimenopausal transition: altered profiles of steroid and pituitary hormones, SHBG and bone mineral density. Maturitas 21:103–113[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Metcalf MG 1983 Incidence of ovulation from the menarche to the menopause: observations of 622 New Zealand women. NZ Med J 96:645–648
  8. Sherman BM, West JH, Korenman SG 1976 The menopausal transition: analysis of LH, FSH, estradiol, and progesterone concentrations during menstrual cycles of older women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 42:629–636[Abstract]
  9. Metcalf MG, Donald RA, Livesey JH 1982 Pituitary-ovarian function before, during and after the menopause: a longitudinal study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 17:489–494[Medline]
  10. Shideler SE, DeVane GW, Kalra PS, Benirschke K, Lasley BL 1989 Ovarian-pituitary hormone interactions during the perimenopause. Maturitas 11:331–339[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Reyes FI, Winter JS, Faiman C 1977 Pituitary-ovarian relationships preceding the menopause. I. A cross-sectional study of serum follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, prolactin, estradiol, and progesterone levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol 129:557–564[Medline]
  12. Key T, Chen J, Wang D, Pike M, Boreham J 1990 Sex hormones in women in rural China and in Britain. Br J Cancer 62:631–636[Medline]
  13. Manson JM, Sammel MD, Freeman EW, Grisso JA 2001 Racial differences in sex hormone levels in women approaching the transition to menopause. Fertil Steril 75:297–304[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Reutman SR, LeMasters GK, Kesner JS, Shukla R, Krieg Jr EF, Knecht EA, Lockey JE 2002 Urinary reproductive hormone level differences between African American and Caucasian women of reproductive age. Fertil Steril 78:383–391[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Randolph Jr JF, Sowers MF, Gold EB, Mohr BA, Luborsky J, Santoro N, McConnell DS, Finkelstein JS, Korenman SG, Matthews KA, Sternfeld B, Lasley BL 2003 Reproductive hormones in the early menopausal transition: relationship to ethnicity, body size, and menopausal status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1516–1522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Sowers MF, Crawford SL, Sternfeld B, Morganstein D, Gold EB, Greendale GA, Evans D, Neer R, Matthews K, Sherman S, Lo A, Weiss G, Kelsey J 2000 SWAN: a multi-center, multi-ethnic, community-based cohort study of women and the menopausal transition. In: Lobo RA, Kelsey J, Marcus R, eds. Menopause: biology and pathobiology. Chap 11. San Diego: Academic Press; 175–188
  17. Ferris B 1978 Epidemiology Standardization Project (American Thoracic Society). Am Rev Respir Dis 118:1–120[Medline]
  18. Brambilla DJ, McKinlay SM, Johannes CB 1994 Defining the perimenopause for application in epidemiologic investigations. Am J Epidemiol 140:1091–1095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. England BG, Parsons GH, Possley RM, McConnell DS, Midgley AR2002. Ultrasensitive semiautomated chemiluminaescent immunoassay for estradiol. Clin Chem 48:1584–1586
  20. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G 2000 Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer; 151–167
  21. Yen SSC, Jaffe RB, Barbieri RL, eds. 1999 Reproductive endocrinology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders
  22. Boulet M, Oddens B, Legert P, Vemer H, Visser A 1994 Climacteric and menopause in seven south-east Asian countries. Maturitas 19:157–176[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Haines C, Chung T, Leung D 1994 A prospective study of the frequency of acute menopausal symptoms in Hong Kong Chinese women. Maturitas 18:175–181[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Gold E 2000 The relation of demographic and lifestyle variables to symptoms in a multiracial/ethnic population of women aged 40–55. Am J Epidemiol 152:463–473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Huang MH, Schocken M, Block G, Sowers MF, Gold E, Sternfeld B, Seeman T, Greendale GA 2002 Variation in nutrient intakes by ethnicity: results from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause 9:309–319[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Prior J 1998 Perimenopause: the complex endocrinology of the menopausal transition. Endocr Rev 19:397–428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Burger H 1999 The endocrinology of the menopause. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 69:31–35[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Seifer D, Scott Jr R, Bergh P, Abrogast L, Friedman C, Mack C, Danforth D 1999 Women with declining ovarian reserve may demonstrate a decrease in day 3 serum inhibin B before a rise in day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone. Fertil Steril 72:63–65[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Samsioe G, Bryman I, Ivarsson E 1985 Some anthropological aspects of the climacteric syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 130:5–7[Medline]
  30. Tang G 1994 The climacteric of Chinese factory workers. Maturitas 19:177–182[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Lock M 1991 Contested meanings of the menopause. Lancet 337:1270–1272[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Liu C Medical care-seeking behavior among climacteric women in Taiwan. Proc 6th International Congress of Menopause, Bangkok, Thailand, 1990
  33. Lock M, Kaufert P, Gilbert P 1988 Cultural construction of the menopausal syndrome: the Japanese case. Maturitas 10:317–332[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Gold E, Bromberger J, Crawford S, Samuels S, Greendale G, Harlow S, Skurnick J 2001 Factors associated with age at natural menopause in a multi-ethnic sample of midlife women. Am J Epidemiol 153:865–874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Torgerson D, Avenell A, Russell E 1994 Factors associated with onset of menopause in women aged 45–49. Maturitas 19:83–92[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Vermeulen A 1993 Environment, human reproduction, menopause, and andropause. Environ Health Perspect 101(Suppl 2):91–100
  37. Dorman JS, Steenkiste AR, Foley TP, Strotmeyer ES, Burke JP, Kuller LH, Kwoh CK 2001 Familial Autoimmune and Diabetes (FAD) study. Menopause in type 1 diabetic women: is it premature? Diabetes 50:1857–1862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Malacara J, Huerta R, Rivera B, Esparza S, Fajardo M 1997 Menopause in normal and uncomplicated NIDDM women: physical and emotional symptoms and hormone profile. Maturitas 28:35–45[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. Santoro, S. L. Crawford, W. L. Lasley, J. L. Luborsky, K. A. Matthews, D. McConnell, J. F. Randolph Jr., E. B. Gold, G. A. Greendale, S. G. Korenman, et al.
Factors Related to Declining Luteal Function in Women during the Menopausal Transition
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 1711 - 1721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
M. ZAIDI, H. C. BLAIR, J. IQBAL, L. L. ZHU, T. R. KUMAR, A. ZALLONE, and L. SUN
Proresorptive Actions of FSH and Bone Loss
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., November 1, 2007; 1116(1): 376 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. E. Hale, X. Zhao, C. L. Hughes, H. G. Burger, D. M. Robertson, and I. S. Fraser
Endocrine Features of Menstrual Cycles in Middle and Late Reproductive Age and the Menopausal Transition Classified According to the Staging of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW) Staging System
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8): 3060 - 3067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. H. Tao, Q. Cai, W. H. Xu, N. Kataoka, W. Wen, W. Zheng, Y. B. Xiang, Z.-F. Zhang, and X. O. Shu
Cytochrome P450 1B1 and Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Genetic Polymorphisms and Endometrial Cancer Risk in Chinese Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2570 - 2573.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. Grady
Management of Menopausal Symptoms
N. Engl. J. Med., November 30, 2006; 355(22): 2338 - 2347.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
B Moy, D Tu, J. Pater, J. Ingle, L. Shepherd, T. Whelan, and P. Goss
Clinical outcomes of ethnic minority women in MA.17: a trial of letrozole after 5 years of tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early stage breast cancer
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2006; 17(11): 1637 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. F. Randolph Jr., S. Crawford, L. Dennerstein, K. Cain, S. D. Harlow, R. Little, E. S. Mitchell, B. Nan, J. Taffe, and M. Yosef
The Value of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Concentration and Clinical Findings as Markers of the Late Menopausal Transition
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2006; 91(8): 3034 - 3040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
R. Osmers, M. Friede, E. Liske, J. Schnitker, J. Freudenstein, and H.-H. Henneicke-von Zepelin
Efficacy and Safety of Isopropanolic Black Cohosh Extract for Climacteric Symptoms
Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2005; 105(5): 1074 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Y. Liu, K. A. Hoey, K. L. Mielke, J. D. Veldhuis, and S. Khosla
A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Short-Term Graded Transdermal Estradiol in Healthy Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist-Suppressed Pre- and Postmenopausal Women: Effects on Serum Markers of Bone Turnover, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I, and Osteoclastogenic Mediators
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 1953 - 1960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
L. A. Newman
Breast Cancer in African-American Women
Oncologist, January 1, 2005; 10(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Randolph, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Little, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Randolph, J. F., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Little, R. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals