help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hegedüs, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hegedüs, L.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 89, No. 3 1181-1187
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

Major Genetic Influence on the Regulation of the Pituitary-Thyroid Axis: A Study of Healthy Danish Twins

Pia Skov Hansen, Thomas Heiberg Brix, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Kirsten Ohm Kyvik and Laszlo Hegedüs

Department of Endocrinology M (P.S.H., T.H.B., L.H.), Odense University Hospital, and The Danish Twin Registry (P.S.H., K.O.K.), Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark; and Danish Epidemiology Science Centre (T.I.A.S.), Institute of Preventive Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-1399 Copenhagen K, Denmark

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Pia Skov Hansen, The Danish Twin Registry, Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Sdr. Boulevard 23A, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark. E-mail: piaskovhansen{at}dadlnet.dk.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Intraindividual variation is smaller than the interindividual variation in serum TSH, free T4, and free T3 concentrations. This suggests that each individual may have a genetically determined thyroid function set-point.

A representative sample of self-reported healthy twin pairs was identified through the Danish Twin Registry. A total of 284 monozygotic (MZ), 286 dizygotic same-sex (DZ), and 120 opposite-sex (OS) twin pairs were investigated. A classical twin study was performed. After adjustment for age, sex, and other covariates, the intraclass correlations of serum TSH, free T4, and free T3 were calculated. To elucidate the relative importance of hereditary and environmental factors on the variation of these hormone levels, quantitative genetic modeling was used.

The intraclass correlations were consistently higher for MZ twin pairs than for DZ twin pairs. Regression analysis suggested that iodine intake played a small but significant role for the concentration of serum TSH and free T4, whereas cigarette smoking was without influence. In quantitative genetic modeling, the heritability (with 95% confidence intervals) accounted for 64% (57–70%) of the variation in serum TSH concentration and 65% (58–71%) and 64% (57–70%), for the concentrations of free T4 and free T3, respectively.

Genetic factors play a substantial role in controlling the pituitary-thyroid axis, indicating that each individual has a genetically determined thyroid function set-point. Whether this is of importance when treating individuals in whom pituitary-thyroid function has been disrupted by, e.g. hypo- or hyperthyroidism, remains to be clarified.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE FUNCTION OF the pituitary-thyroid axis is evaluated by measuring serum concentrations of TSH, free T4, and free T3. In healthy subjects, thyroid function variables, whether measured as serum TSH, free T4, or free T3, show a considerable interindividual variability (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). In contrast, these hormones seem to be maintained within relatively narrow limits in the individual (1, 2, 3, 6). Thus, it is suggested that each individual may have a unique thyroid function set-point (3, 6). This is compatible with a genetic influence on the regulation of the pituitary-thyroid axis.

On the other hand, it is well accepted that factors such as iodine intake (7, 8), sex (9, 10), and time of blood sampling (1, 11, 12) influence the serum TSH concentrations. Furthermore, factors such as age (13, 14, 15), cigarette smoking (16, 17), and phase of menstrual cycle (18) seem to influence concentrations of serum TSH, free T3, and free T4 although the latter findings are less unanimous. The importance of these factors compared with hereditary factors is largely unknown. To elucidate the relative impact of genetic and environmental influence on serum TSH, free T4, and free T3 concentrations, we studied a large twin sample.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

The present study is part of a nationwide project (GEMINAKAR) investigating the relative influence of genetic and environmental factors on a variety of different traits among Danish twins.

A representative sample of complete twin pairs was recruited from the population-based Danish Twin Registry (19, 20). The majority of these twins participated in a questionnaire survey regarding physical health and health-related behavior. The twins included in the GEMINAKAR study were healthy as reported by themselves. To get an equal distribution of twin pairs, sampling was stratified according to age, sex, and zygosity.

The examinations were running in parallel, throughout the year, at The Danish Twin Registry in Odense and at The Institute of Preventive Medicine in Copenhagen from August 1997 to November 2000. The twins in a pair were examined on the same day. All twins with at least one partner living in the western part of Denmark were examined in Odense, whereas all those where both partners were living in the eastern part of Denmark were examined in Copenhagen. With the exception of 39 twin pairs, both twins in a pair lived in the same geographic region of Denmark. Denmark is regarded as an area with mild to moderate iodine deficiency (21). Blood samples were drawn between 0800 and 0900 h after a 12-h fast and followed by a clinical examination. During the day the twins filled in additional questionnaires regarding their general health and lifestyle including questions regarding thyroid disease, smoking habits, and medicine intake.

In all, 1512 individuals (756 twin pairs) were examined. However, due to a missing blood sample (39 persons in 20 twin pairs) and self-reported thyroid disease (32 persons in 28 twin pairs), 71 subjects distributed in 48 pairs were excluded. Moreover, three subjects had overt biochemical hyperthyroidism defined as decreased serum TSH (serum TSH < 0.3 mU/liter) and increased serum free T4 (serum free T4 > 17.7 pmol/liter) and/or increased serum free T3 (serum free T3 > 7.4 pmol/liter). Additionally, 16 individuals had overt hypothyroidism defined as serum TSH greater than 4.0 mU/liter and serum free T4 less than 9.9 pmol/liter. These individuals and their co-twins were also excluded, leaving a total of 1380 healthy individuals or 690 twin pairs distributed in 284 monozygotic (MZ), 286 dizygotic same-sex (DZ), and 120 opposite-sex (OS) twin pairs. One individual in a DZ twin pair had a missing serum free T3 value. Therefore, only 285 complete twin pairs were available in the regression and twin analyses. In an attempt to identify additional cases of thyroid disease, information was sought from The National Discharge Register as a part of a record linkage between The Danish Twin Registry and The National Discharge Register. No additional cases were identified.

Individuals with chronic diseases such as back pain, asthma, migraine, etc. were included in the study population, but no twins were taking medicine that could affect the pituitary-thyroid axis. Mean age of the MZ twins were 37.1 yr (range 17–59 yr) and 36.9 yr (range 18–66 yr) and 37.2 yr (range 17–57 yr) for the DZ same-sex twins and DZ OS twins, respectively.

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study was approved by all regional Danish Scientific-Ethical Committees (case file 97/25 PMC).

Assays

Serum TSH was measured using a time-resolved fluoroimmunometric assay (AutoDELFIA hTSH Ultra Kit, Perkin-Elmer/Wallac, Turku, Finland). Reference range is 0.30–4.00 mU/liter. The intra- and interassay coefficient of variation (CV) at serum TSH concentrations between 0.046 and17.6 mU/liter is from 1.3–4.7% and 1.7–3.7%, respectively.

Serum free T4 and serum free T3 were determined using the AutoDELFIA FT4 and FT3 (Perkin-Elmer/Wallac), respectively. For free T4, the reference range is 9.9–17.7 pmol/liter, and for free T3 it is 4.3–7.4 pmol/liter. The intra- and interassay CV for free T4 at serum free T4 concentrations between 9.2 and 19.2 pmol/liter are from 1.3–2.0% and 3.9–5.4%, respectively. For free T3, the intra- and interassay CV at serum free T3 concentrations between 4.7 and 9.7 pmol/liter are from 3.9–5.0% and 2.9–4.2%, respectively. Thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAbs) and thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAbs) were measured by solid-phase, two-step, time-resolved fluoroimmunoassays (AutoDELFIA TPOAb kit and hTgAb kit, respectively, Perkin-Elmer/ Wallac). Intra- and interassay CV for TPOAb and TgAb were from 3.2–8.4% and 3.8–10.1%, respectively, in the range of 50–155 U/ml. Values above 60 U/ml were regarded as positive for TPOAb as well as for TgAb. Subjects were considered as antibody positive if either of the tests was positive. Twin pairs were analyzed within the same run. All the serum samples were analyzed at the same laboratory in Odense. Zygosity was established by analysis of nine highly polymorphic restriction fragment length polymorphisms and microsatellite markers widely scattered through the genome with a PE Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) AmpFISTR Profiler Plus kit (22).

Statistical analyses

Before analysis, the frequency distribution of serum TSH, free T4, and free T3 was examined to detect any deviation from a Gaussian distribution. Only the serum TSH concentration was skewed, and after descriptive analyses but before twin analysis, serum TSH transformed using the natural logarithm (lnTSH). In the descriptive analyses, a modified Wilcoxon test was used testing the differences between the groups (23).

The potential effects of serum free T4, serum free T3, age, sex, examination place, thyroid antibody status, cigarette smoking (smokers were defined as former or current smokers, whereas nonsmokers were subjects who never had been smoking), and body mass index (BMI, defined as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) on the serum TSH concentration were analyzed using backward stepwise multiple regression analysis (with a limit for entry into the model of 0.05) and with cluster option (taking the dependence of the twin data into account). MZ, DZ, and OS twin pairs were used in the descriptive and the regression analyses.

The intraclass correlation coefficients and heritability estimates for lnTSH, free T4, and free T3 were calculated using the adjusted residuals resulting from the regression. Due to the gender-related difference in mean values of serum TSH, free T4, and free T3, only MZ and DZ same-sex pairs were used in these calculations. Including OS twin pairs would have violated some of the assumptions in the twin model used.

The analyses of serum free T4 and free T3 were performed in the same way. The adjustment for serum free T4 included lnTSH and free T3, whereas the adjustment for serum free T3 included lnTSH and free T4.

Quantitative genetic model fitting of twin data

The classical twin study compares phenotypic resemblances of MZ and DZ twins and is based on the assumption that MZ twins are genetically identical, whereas DZ twins share, on average, 50% of their genes (24, 25, 26, 27).

Structural equation modeling was used to estimate the magnitude of the genetic and environmental effects. This technique quantifies sources of individual differences by decomposing the observed phenotypic variance into genetic and environmental contributions (25, 27). The genetic contribution is divided into an additive (A) component (represents the influence of alleles at several gene loci acting in an additive manner) and a dominant (D) genetic component (represents intralocus interaction). The environmental contribution is divided into a shared/common environmental component (C) (refers to environmental factors that are affecting both twins in a pair in the same way and are a source of their similarity) and a unique (E) environmental component (the environmental factors that are not shared by twins in a pair and are a source of their dissimilarity). The latter component (E) also includes measurement error, which in this case is the analytical and intraindividual variation. The heritability can be defined as the proportion of the total variance attributable to additive genetic variation.

The significance of A, C, D, and E were tested by removing them sequentially in specific nested submodels and comparing them with the full model as described elsewhere (25). The following etiological models were fitted to the data: ACE, AE, CE, E, ADE, and DE. The selection of the best fitting model was based on a balance between goodness of fit and parsimony (25). The fit of the models were assessed by {chi}2 tests (a small {chi}2 value and a high P value indicates a good agreement between the model and the observed data). The Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) (28), which corresponds to {chi}2 - 2 x degrees of freedom, was used to assess parsimony (explain the observed data as well as possible with as few parameters as possible). Models with the lowest AIC were preferred.

Statistical software

The statistical analyses were carried out using STATA (version 7) (29). Level of significance was set to 0.05. Univariate quantitative genetic modeling was carried out using Mx software (30).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Descriptive statistics

Table 1Go shows the basic descriptive statistics for serum concentrations of TSH, free T4, and free T3 with respect to sex, examination place, antibody status, smoking, and zygosity. The serum TSH concentration was significantly higher in women than in men, whereas the serum free T4 and free T3 concentrations were significantly lower in women than in men. Individuals examined in Copenhagen (and therefore living in the eastern part of Denmark) had a significantly higher serum TSH concentration than the twins examined and living in the western part of Denmark. Individuals that were TgAb positive and/or TPOAb positive had a higher TSH level compared with antibody-negative persons. The TSH concentration was slightly higher in nonsmokers than in smokers. There was no difference in serum TSH, serum free T4, or free T3 between the MZ and DZ groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Basic descriptives for serum TSH, free T4, and free T3 according to sex, examination place, thyroid antibody status, smoking habits, and zygosity

 
There was no linear relationship between the serum TSH concentration and the serum free T4 concentration, neither in the whole study population nor when subdividing into the different zygosity classes (data not shown).

Table 2Go presents the results of the regression analysis on the serum lnTSH, the serum free T4, and serum free T3 concentration, respectively. In general, the regression coefficients were small, and the SDs and variances were reduced only minimally (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Results of the regression analyses regarding serum lnTSH, free T4, and free T3 concentrations

 
Intraclass correlations

Figure 1Go is a scatterplot of the transformed serum TSH levels for the 284 MZ twin pairs and 285 DZ same-sex twin pairs. In MZ twins, a clear clustering is seen at the line of identity, whereas DZ twins show a more scattered pattern.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Scatterplots and intraclass correlations of serum lnTSH, free T4, and free T3 levels according to zygosity. Number of twin pairs and 95% confidence intervals are given in parentheses.

 
Furthermore, the intraclass correlations for the concentration of the logarithmically transformed serum TSH and the serum free T4 and free T3 concentrations are presented in Fig. 1Go. The correlation coefficients for the transformed TSH concentrations were significantly higher for MZ pairs than for DZ pairs (P < 0.00005). Because of the feedback loop between serum TSH and the free thyroid hormone concentrations, we also performed the analysis without adjusting for serum free T3 and free T4 concentrations in the regression analyses. The intraclass correlations were largely unchanged (data not shown). As evident from Fig. 1Go, the MZ correlations for serum free T4 and free T3 were also significantly higher than the corresponding DZ correlations, although the difference in correlations between the twin groups was less pronounced looking at serum free T3 (free T4, P < 0.00005; free T3, P = 0.0004). Subdividing the analysis according to sex did not change the overall results (data not shown).

Biometric analyses

The results of the model-fitting analyses are presented in Table 3Go. Comparing the full models (ACE and ADE), the univariate model-fitting procedure revealed that the ADE model provided a slightly better fit to the data for lnTSH, free T4, and free T3. However, in the ADE model, the components were estimated with large confidence intervals in all three groups. Reduction to nested submodels indicated that the AE model was the best fitting model, because of small {chi}2 statistics and high P values. This simpler model was favored because it provides a more simple and parsimonious explanation of the observed data. This is reflected by the low AIC values. Thus, additive genetic factors and unique environmental factors were the most important in explaining the interindividual differences in concentrations of serum TSH, free T3, and free T4. As evident from Table 3Go and Fig. 2Go, additive genetic effects (i.e. the heritability) explained 64% (confidence interval, 57–70%) of the total variance in serum TSH concentration, whereas the estimate for the unique environmental (E) effect was 36% (confidence interval, 31–43%). Lack of adjusting for serum free T4 and free T3 concentrations did not influence this estimate (data not shown). Additive genetic effects explained 65% (58–71%) and 64% (57–70%) of the variance for serum free T4 and free T3 concentrations, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Results of model-fitting analyses for lnTSH, free T4, and free T3

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Estimates of additive genetic and unique environmental contributions (in percent) to variation in serum lnTSH, free T4, and free T3 concentrations.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have demonstrated that additive genetic factors (heritability) explained approximately 65% of the variation in serum TSH concentration as well as serum free T4 and free T3 concentrations in healthy subjects. These high heritability estimates are compatible with a genetically determined thyroid function set-point in each individual. Thus, our study explains why previous studies have found narrow intraindividual variations of serum TSH, free T4, and free T3 (1, 2, 3, 6).

Given the standardized conditions and the large number of subjects in our study we are confident that our results are reliable. However, it is worth emphasizing that the heritability estimate is population specific. Nevertheless, within the range of sampling error, the estimates tend to be rather similar across populations (31), and a heritability estimate of serum lnTSH, T4, and T3 in other populations will most likely be within the 95% confidence intervals reported here. Based on just 15 MZ and 15 DZ male twin pairs and less sophisticated statistical methods, Meikle et al. (32) suggested that heritability accounted for 44% of the variation in plasma free T4. Their study size did not allow for estimating heritability of plasma T3 and TSH or the evaluation of possible environmental influences.

Whether the demonstrated genetic influence is related to the intrinsic capacity to synthesize and secrete TSH, the level of pituitary sensitivity to T4 and T3, the level of secretion of thyroid releasing hormone, the peripheral conversion of T4 to T3, or a combination of these cannot be explained by our study. A recent study by Peeters et al. (33) identifies specific polymorphisms located in the coding sequences of the iodothyronine deiodinases and the TSH receptor, which is associated with plasma thyroid hormone levels and TSH levels, respectively. These possible loci might be involved in the regulation of thyroid function, and these genetic contributions are a part of the genetic effect estimated in our study.

The feedback loop interconnecting the pituitary and the thyroid gland is well characterized. In stable phases, the serum TSH level is the most reliable indicator of thyroid status (34), and thus we have focused on the serum TSH level as the primary marker of thyroid function. The serum TSH concentration displays pulsatile (12, 35) and diurnal variation (1, 11, 12), the levels being highest at night and lowest in the daytime. These factors together with the short half-life of TSH (~60 min) (11) contribute to a substantial intraindividual variability. In our study, all blood samples were drawn in the morning between 0800 and 0900 h, and the twins in a pair were examined on the same day and at the same time, which means that the diurnal and the intraindividual variations are negligible.

We regard this sample of twins representative for the general population. We have no reason to believe that twins differ in thyroid function compared with singletons in the general population, because basic thyroid-related characteristics such as sex and regional differences in serum TSH level were similar to those in comparable studies of thyroid function in Denmark (7, 9), an area with mild to moderate iodine deficiency. The difference in TSH levels, with higher values in the eastern part of Denmark (i.e. subjects examined in Copenhagen), is best explained by a higher iodine intake in the eastern part as demonstrated in previous studies (36, 37). As found by others (7), we could demonstrate an age-related decline in serum TSH level in both regions of Denmark. This decline was more pronounced in the region with moderate iodine deficiency (data not shown) and is probably due to autonomous functioning thyroid tissue among the elderly in the most iodine-deficient region.

The potential effects of age, sex, examination place, antibody status, cigarette smoking, and BMI on the serum TSH level were examined by multiple linear regression analysis. However, these variables explained only a small fraction of the variation as reflected by a minimal reduction in SDs and variances. Similarly, we found small effects of the same parameters looking at the serum free T4 and serum free T3 concentrations. One explanation may be that we are trying to explain the variation with linear relations, whereas these relations may be nonlinear. As an example, we excluded persons with self-reported thyroid disease and biochemical thyroid disease. Thus, in our final study population we were looking only at a narrow range of thyroid function. The relationship between serum TSH and serum free T4 concentration was now almost nonexistent, reflected in a circular scatter when plotting the serum TSH concentration vs. free T4 concentration (data not shown). However, the regression analysis revealed a significant influence. Therefore, it seems wrong not adjusting for serum free T4 concentration as well as for the other parameters.

This study is a classical twin study and is built upon certain premises. The most important might be the assumption that MZ twin pairs are not treated more similarly than DZ twin pairs (25). The consequence is an overestimation of the genetic influence, because it may not be clear whether the effect on the phenotype is elicited by the genotype or is simply a matter of identical individuals being exposed to similar environmental factors. In addition, we assume that no gene-environment interaction exists (25). This assumption implies that an environmental factor has the same effect on the phenotype regardless of the genotype of the individual (25). This may not be the case.

In conclusion, our results demonstrate that interindividual differences in the pituitary-thyroid axis are predominantly determined by genetic factors in healthy subjects, and offer a possible explanation for the relatively narrow limits of thyroid hormones in the individual, as opposed to considerable interindividual variation. This is compatible with a unique thyroid function set-point predominantly under genetic influence. Because we do not know the exact set-point in the healthy individual, our findings imply that it may be difficult to restore normal thyroid function in the individual when for instance treating hypo- or hyperthyroidism (38). However, the possible clinical importance of our findings still remains unclarified.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Ole Blaabjerg and Esther Jensen for performing the clinical biochemical analyses and Jacob Hjelmborg and Ivan Iachine for excellent statistical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by grants from the Foundation of 17-12-1981, the Agnes and Knut Mørks Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Foundation of Medical Research in the County of Funen, Else Poulsens Mindelegat, the Foundation of Direktør Jacob Madsen and Hustru Olga Madsen, the Foundation of Johan Boserup and Lise Boserup, the A. P. Møller and Hustru Chastine McKinney Møllers Foundation, and the Clinical Research Institute, Odense University. Perkin-Elmer/Wallac, Turku, Finland, kindly provided the kits for determination of serum TSH, freeT4, freeT3, TgAb, and TPOAb.

Abbreviations: A, Additive component; AIC, Akaike’s information criterion; BMI, body mass index; C, shared/common environmental component; CV, coefficient(s) of variation; D, dominant genetic component; DZ, dizygotic same-sex; E, unique environmental component; lnTSH, the natural logarithm of the serum TSH level; MZ, monozygotic; OS, opposite-sex; TgAb, thyroglobulin antibody; TPOAb, thyroid peroxidase antibody.

Received September 22, 2003.

Accepted November 26, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Maes M, Mommen K, Hendrickx D, Peeters D, D’Hondt P, Ranjan R, De Meyer F, Scharpe S 1997 Components of biological variation, including seasonality, in blood concentrations of TSH, TT3, FT4, PRL, cortisol and testosterone in healthy volunteers. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 46:587–598[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Nagayama I, Yamamoto K, Saito K, Kuzuya T, Saito T 1993 Subject-based reference values in thyroid function tests. Endocr J 40:557–562[Medline]
  3. Andersen S, Pedersen KM, Bruun NH, Laurberg P 2002 Narrow individual variations in serum T4 and T3 in normal subjects: a clue to the understanding of subclinical thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1068–1072[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Browning MC, Ford RP, Callaghan SJ, Fraser CG 1986 Intra- and interindividual biological variation of five analytes used in assessing thyroid function: implications for necessary standards of performance and the interpretation of results. Clin Chem 32:962–966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Meier CA, Maisey MN, Lowry A, Muller J, Smith MA 1993 Interindividual differences in the pituitary-thyroid axis influence the interpretation of thyroid function tests. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 39:101–107[Medline]
  6. Harrop JS, Ashwell K, Hopton MR 1985 Circannual and within-individual variation of thyroid function tests in normal subjects. Ann Clin Biochem 22:371–375[Medline]
  7. Knudsen N, Laurberg P, Perrild H, Bülow I, Ovesen L, Jørgensen T 2002 Risk factors for goiter and thyroid nodules. Thyroid 12:879–888[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Bülow I, Knudsen N, Jørgensen T, Perrild H, Ovesen L, Laurberg P 2002 Large differences in incidences of overt hyper- and hypothyroidism associated with a small difference in iodine intake: a prospective comparative register-based population survey. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4462–4469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Knudsen N, Jørgensen T, Rasmussen S, Christiansen E, Perrild H 1999 The prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in a population with borderline iodine deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 51:361–367[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Franklyn JA, Ramsden DB, Sheppard MC 1985 The influence of age and sex on tests of thyroid function. Ann Clin Biochem 22:502–505[Medline]
  11. Weeke J, Gundersen HJ 1978 Circadian and 30 minutes variations in serum TSH and thyroid hormones in normal subjects. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 89:659–672[Medline]
  12. Brabant G, Prank K, Ranft U, Schuermeyer T, Wagner TO, Hauser H, Kummer B, Feistner H, Hesch RD, von zur Muhlen A 1990 Physiological regulation of circadian and pulsatile thyrotropin secretion in normal man and woman. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:403–409[Abstract]
  13. Fisher DA 1996 Physiological variations in thyroid hormones: physiological and pathophysiological considerations. Clin Chem 42:135–139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Hegedüs L, Perrild H, Poulsen LR, Andersen JR, Holm B, Schnohr P, Jensen G, Hansen JM 1983 The determination of thyroid volume by ultrasound and its relationship to body weight, age, and sex in normal subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 56:260–263[Abstract]
  15. Leitol H, Behrends J, Brabant G 2002 The thyroid axis in ageing. Novartis Found Symp 242:193–201[Medline]
  16. Bertelsen JB, Hegedüs L 1994 Cigarette smoking and the thyroid. Thyroid 4:327–331[Medline]
  17. Bartalena L, Bogazzi F, Tanda ML, Manetti L, Dell’Unto E, Martino E 1995 Cigarette smoking and the thyroid. Eur J Endocrinol 133:507–512[Medline]
  18. Hegedüs L, Karstrup S, Rasmussen N 1986 Evidence of cyclic alterations of thyroid size during the menstrual cycle in healthy women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:142–145[Medline]
  19. Skytthe A, Kyvik KO, Holm NV, Vaupel JW, Christensen K 2002 The Danish Twin Registry: 127 birth cohorts of twins. Twin Res 5:352–357[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Kyvik KO, Christensen K, Skytthe A, Harvald B, Holm NV 1996 The Danish Twin Register. Dan Med Bull 43:467–470[Medline]
  21. Knudsen N, Bülow I, Jørgensen T, Laurberg P, Ovesen L, Perrild H 2000 Comparative study of thyroid function and types of thyroid dysfunction in two areas in Denmark with slightly different iodine status. Eur J Endocrinol 143:485–491[Abstract]
  22. 1997 AmpFISTR Profiler Plus user’s manual. Foster City, CA: The Perkin-Elmer Corp.
  23. Brunner E 1991 A nonparametric estimator of the shift effect for repeated observations. Biometrics 47:1149–1153[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Boomsma D, Busjahn A, Peltonen L 2002 Classical twin studies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 3:872–882[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Neale MC, Maes HH 2002 Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  26. Plomin R, DeFries JC, McClearn GE, McGuffin P 2001 Behavioral Genetics. 4th ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.
  27. Evans DM, Gillespie NA, Martin NG 2002 Biometrical genetics. Biol Psychol 61:33–51[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Akaike H 1987 Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52:317–332[CrossRef]
  29. 2001 Stata statistical software: Release 7.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corp.
  30. Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH 2002 Mx: statistical modeling. 6th ed. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University
  31. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC 1996 Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Harlow, UK: Longman Group
  32. Meikle AW, Stringham JD, Woodward MG, Nelson JC 1988 Hereditary and environmental influences on the variation of thyroid hormones in normal male twins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66:588–592[Abstract]
  33. Peeters RP, van Toor H, Klootwijk W, de Rijke YB, Kuiper GG, Uitterlinden AG, Visser TJ 2003 Polymorphisms in thyroid hormone pathway genes are associated with plasma TSH and iodothyronine levels in healthy subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:2880–2888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Demers LM, Spencer CA 2003 Laboratory medicine practice guidelines: laboratory support for the diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid disease. Thyroid 13:3–126[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Romijn JA, Adriaanse R, Brabant G, Prank K, Endert E, Wiersinga WM 1990 Pulsatile secretion of thyrotropin during fasting: a decrease of thyrotropin pulse amplitude. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:1631–1636[Abstract]
  36. Andersen S, Petersen SB, Laurberg P 2002 Iodine in drinking water in Denmark is bound in humic substances. Eur J Endocrinol 147:663–670[Abstract]
  37. Pedersen KM, Laurberg P, Nøhr S, Jørgensen A, Andersen S 1999 Iodine in drinking water varies by more than 100-fold in Denmark. Importance for iodine content of infant formulas. Eur J Endocrinol 140:400–403[Abstract]
  38. Romijn JA, Smit JW, Lamberts SW 2003 Intrinsic imperfections of endocrine replacement therapy. Eur J Endocrinol 149:91–97[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
B. Biondi and D. S. Cooper
The Clinical Significance of Subclinical Thyroid Dysfunction
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2008; 29(1): 76 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. S. Hansen, T. H. Brix, I. Iachine, T. I. A. Sorensen, K. O. Kyvik, and L. Hegedus
Genetic and environmental interrelations between measurements of thyroid function in a healthy Danish twin population
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2007; 292(3): E765 - E770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. J. de Jong, R. P. Peeters, T. den Heijer, W. M. van der Deure, A. Hofman, A. G. Uitterlinden, T. J. Visser, and M. M. B. Breteler
The Association of Polymorphisms in the Type 1 and 2 Deiodinase Genes with Circulating Thyroid Hormone Parameters and Atrophy of the Medial Temporal Lobe
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 636 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
R. P Peeters, W. M van der Deure, and T. J Visser
Genetic variation in thyroid hormone pathway genes; polymorphisms in the TSH receptor and the iodothyronine deiodinases.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 155(5): 655 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
R THOMAS ZOELLER
Collision of Basic and Applied Approaches to Risk Assessment of Thyroid Toxicants.
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., September 1, 2006; 1076: 168 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
G Brabant, P Beck-Peccoz, B Jarzab, P Laurberg, J Orgiazzi, I Szabolcs, A P Weetman, and W M Wiersinga
Is there a need to redefine the upper normal limit of TSH?
Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2006; 154(5): 633 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. Gumieniak, S. Hurwitz, T. S. Perlstein, U. C. Ngumezi, P. N. Hopkins, X. Jeunemaitre, and G. H. Williams
Aggregation of High-Normal Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone in Hypertensive Families
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 5985 - 5990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. Knudsen, P. Laurberg, L. B. Rasmussen, I. Bulow, H. Perrild, L. Ovesen, and T. Jorgensen
Small Differences in Thyroid Function May Be Important for Body Mass Index and the Occurrence of Obesity in the Population
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 4019 - 4024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. S. Hansen, T. H. Brix, F. N. Bennedbaek, S. J. Bonnema, K. O. Kyvik, and L. Hegedus
Genetic and Environmental Causes of Individual Differences in Thyroid Size: A Study of Healthy Danish Twins
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2004; 89(5): 2071 - 2077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hegedüs, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hegedüs, L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals