| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Nutrition/Infection Unit, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Tufts University School of Medicine (J.B.B., M.N.W., B.G., S.L.G.), and Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University (J.B.B., M.N.W., S.L.-F., E.J.S., B.G., S.L.G.), Boston, Massachusetts 02111; The Lipid Metabolism Laboratory, Jean Mayer U.S. Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging (S.L.-F., E.J.S., J.R.M.), Boston, Massachusetts 02111; Departments of Epidemiology (E.H.) and Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health (D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts 02115; and Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School (C.L.), Worcester, Massachusetts 01605
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Junaidah B. Barnett, Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Room 245, Jaharis Building, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02111. E-mail: junaidah.barnett{at}tufts.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Estrogen levels are higher during the luteal compared with the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. We hypothesize that compared with the follicular phase, the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle has a lipid and lipoprotein profile associated with decreased risk of CHD. Data to test this hypothesis were obtained from women who participated in a well controlled metabolic study (25, 26). Levels of lipids and lipoproteins as well as sex hormones were determined during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. This study provides important data on the levels of lipids and lipoproteins as well as sex hormones during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle under very controlled metabolic conditions.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The women were started on the metabolically controlled diet 12 wk before their next expected menses, and they were studied for one menstrual cycle. Variability between and within subjects with respect to diet was minimized in this study. Each subject was given the same defined Western diet (40% of calories from fat; polyunsaturated:saturated:monounsaturated ratio of 1:2:2; 400 mg cholesterol, 1617% protein, 4344% carbohydrate, and 12 g dietary fiber). This combination of dietary fat, fiber, and cholesterol is typical of diets consumed in the United States (27). The dietary fiber provided was a mixture of fiber sources, with approximately equal contributions from grains, legumes, fruits, and vegetables. Caloric intakes were calculated by a nutritionist using standard intakes for sex, age, weight, usual levels of physical activity, and dietary intake to keep body weight constant throughout the study. The Metabolic Research Unit at Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University prepared all foods consumed by the subjects during the study. Food portions were weighed to 0.1 g, and trays were checked after each meal. Subjects ate three meals a day at the Human Nutrition Research Center on weekdays. In addition to snacks, all weekend and holiday meals were packaged for subjects to take home with them. Subjects were allowed to drink diet ginger ale, black coffee and teas, and herbal teas. Subjects were placed on this diet for about 11.5 months depending on when they actually started menstruating after being on the diet. During this time blood samples were collected during the follicular and luteal phases of their menstrual cycle. No significant weight changes occurred during the study.
For the lipid and lipoprotein determinations, a single follicular phase blood sample was collected on any day, 39 d after the onset of menses, and a single luteal phase blood sample was collected 1012 d after a color change was observed using the Ovustick (Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc., Mountain View, CA), a qualitative assay that identifies the LH surge in urine samples 2436 h before ovulation. Blood samples for follicular hormone levels were collected on 3 consecutive mornings beginning on any d 39 after the onset of menses and on 3 alternate days beginning on any day, 68 d after a color change was observed using the Ovustick (for identification of ovulation) for the luteal hormone levels. However, in some cases the color change was not observed, and blood samples were collected despite the lack of color change before the women were expected to return to the follicular phase again. In several cases, the womens menstrual cycle lengths were actually longer than those reported. Thus, the criteria for defining the luteal phase were reevaluated after determination of the actual length of the menstrual cycle of each woman and using the luteal progesterone value obtained. It is known that the number of days in the follicular phase is extended as the number of days of a menstrual cycle is increased, whereas the number of days of the luteal phase remains the same (28, 29). Therefore, counting forward to define days of the luteal phase will result in a wide spread of days defined as luteal depending on the total length of the cycle. Counting backwards to the luteal phase collection from the next menstrual bleeding was used in our analysis because it is independent of cycle length, which varies.
Lipoprotein determinations
Subjects fasted 14 h before blood was drawn for lipid and lipoprotein determinations during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. They were also asked not to perform rigorous physical activity for 24 h and to be seated for 10 min before venipuncture. Blood samples were collected in 0.1% EDTA, spun for 20 min at 2,500 rpm (1,000 g) at 4 C, and analyzed within 48 h. Determination of total plasma cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TG) was performed using automated enzymatic methodologies with a Spectrum CCx Chemistry Analyzer (Abbott Diagnostics, Dallas, TX) (30). Plasma HDL-C was determined in supernatants obtained using a dextran sulfate-Mg2+ procedure previously described (31) to precipitate apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins. Using a Beckman L870 ultracentrifuge (Palo Alto, CA), plasma was subjected to ultracentrifugation at a density of 1.006 g/ml for 18 h at 39,000 rpm (109,000 x g) at 4 C in a 50.3 titanium rotor (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), and the 1.006 g/ml supernatant and infranatant fractions were separated by tube slicing. Enzymatic methods were used to determine cholesterol concentrations in the 1.006 g/ml infranatant fraction as well as in whole plasma. The TC and HDL-C values obtained have been standardized with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Standardization Program. Calculations to determine VLDL-C and LDL-C values are consistent with established Lipid Research Clinic methodology (32). The VLDL-C concentrations were calculated as the difference between plasma concentrations and concentrations obtained on the 1.006 g/ml infranatant fraction, and the plasma LDL-C concentrations were calculated as the difference between concentrations obtained from the 1.006 g/ml infranatant fraction and the HDL-C concentrations. TC/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C ratios were also computed. Our coefficient of variations are typically less than 2% for TC and less than 3% for TG and HDL-C.
Hormone determinations
Twenty milliliters of blood were collected each of the 3 mornings to obtain approximately 610 ml serum/d by centrifugation at 1400 x g for 22 min at 4 C for hormone analyses. Samples were stored at -70 C for no more than 6 months before sample analysis. Serum estrone, estrone sulfate, estradiol, androstenedione, and testosterone were measured by RIAs involving solvent extraction and Celite chromatography as previously described (33, 34). The percent free testosterone and percent free estradiol were measured using an ultrafiltration technique (35, 36, 37). The diethylaminoethyl cellulose filter technique was used to measure the level of SHBG (36, 37, 38). Progesterone levels during the luteal phase were determined by RIA (39). Prolactin levels were determined using a kit from Serono Laboratories (Norwell, MA), supplied through Ciba-Corning (Medfield, MA). All samples were coded using a random number system, and blinded duplicates were included as a quality control measure.
Statistical methods
Selection of subjects. Only women with menstrual cycle lengths 2535 d and those with follicular lipid and lipoprotein blood collection within d 47 after the onset of menses were included in our analyses. Additionally, only women with luteal lipid and lipoprotein blood collection within 48 d before the beginning of the next menstrual cycle who had progesterone levels equal to or greater than 30.2 nmol/liter (or 9.5 ng/ml) during the luteal phase lipid blood collection were included in the analyses. The criterion of equal to or greater than 30.2 nmol/liter (or 9.5 ng/ml) was chosen for luteal phase progesterone levels because this level was selected to rule out anovulatory cycles (40). Thus, in this study, in addition to minimizing factors that could influence lipid and lipoprotein measurements by controlling them in subject eligibility and providing subjects with a metabolically controlled diet, the day of the menstrual cycle that plasma was collected for lipid and lipoprotein data and the criteria used to define the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle were clearly defined.
As some women went through more than one study protocol (the number of protocols per woman ranged from one to seven), our original dataset comprised 48 women with 90 follicular lipid measurements and 41 women with 66 luteal lipid measurements. Seven women had only follicular lipid measurements. Forty-eight women had 171190 follicular hormone measurements, and 3743 women had 157179 luteal hormone measurements (except only 22 women had 75 measurements of luteal SHBG). Using the criteria defined above, data from 39 women with 58 follicular lipid measurements and 30 women with 42 luteal lipid measurements were included in the final analysis. Of these, data from 25 subjects with both follicular and luteal lipid measures were included in the paired t test analyses. Fourteen women had only follicular measurements, whereas five had only luteal measurements. In the well defined group, 4344 women had 114123 follicular hormone measurements, and 3336 women had 8693 luteal hormone measurements.
Data analysis. A natural logarithm transformation was used to normalize the distributions of the lipid, lipoprotein, and hormone levels (which were skewed to the left) for valid statistical inference. Data are thus reported as geometric means and SE ranges (emean ± SE).
Generalized estimating equations (41) were used to obtain estimates of the log percent difference (which was converted into the percent difference) in the lipid, lipoprotein, and hormone levels observed between the follicular and luteal phases after adjusting for age and body mass index, calendar time, and season. Because the study took place over a long period of time and across seasons, calendar time was modeled as a continuous variable using the date of the sample as a linear term, and the seasons were modeled as indicators for 3-month periods appropriate to Boston. There were some significant lipid and lipoprotein variations due to seasons in this study. Age was modeled in three-knot restricted cubic splines (42) to allow for a nonlinear relation, whereas body mass index was modeled as a linear effect, because it showed no evidence of nonlinear relations with the lipid and lipoprotein values.
In addition, as mentioned previously, we performed paired t tests comparing the mean change in the levels of lipids and lipoproteins between the luteal and follicular phases on data from women who had values from both follicular and luteal phases (n = 25). The paired t tests are useful in that all subject-specific sources of variation, specifically age, body mass index, season, and calendar time, are completely controlled without any need to model them and possibly misspecify the model as in the multivariate analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although Mattsson et al. (n = 22) and Nduka and Agbedana (n = 14) found a significant 11% increase in the level of HDL-C during the luteal compared with the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle (9, 13) (Table 4
), our findings showed a nonsignificant increase of only 2.5% (Table 2
). The risk of CHD has been shown to decrease by 23%/0.026 mM (1 mg/dl) increase in HDL-C (24). Such small changes in levels, although not statistically significant, may be clinically relevant over time. The LDL-C level, however, was significantly lower (by 6.2%) during the luteal phase, and TC was lower by a nonsignificant 2.9% (Table 2
). Higher magnitudes of change in these levels have been observed previously. Significant decreases of up to 10% have been observed in the levels of TC (8, 10, 12, 13) and LDL-C (9, 16) by other researchers during the luteal compared with the follicular phase (Table 4
).
|
12%) (9), and LDL-C/HDL-C (of up to 18%) (9, 16) in the follicular vs. the luteal phase (Table 4Exogenous estrogens have been reported to decrease TC and LDL-C and increase HDL-C (43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48). Estrogen increases the hepatic synthesis of LDL receptor (apolipoprotein B-100), resulting in increased LDL uptake (49). In addition, estrogen treatment has been shown to increase the production of apolipoprotein A-I, a major HDL protein, in both pre- and postmenopausal women (1, 50, 51).
In this study the 2.5% increase in the level of HDL-C in the luteal phase, which may be clinically (24), although not statistically (Table 2
), significant does indicate the exertion of an estrogenic influence on this lipoprotein level. The degree of the estrogenic influence, however, was not large despite the highly significant increases in estrogen levels (Table 3
). This may be due to the actions not only of endogenous estrogens, but also of other endogenous hormones, such as progesterone and androstenedione, which are reported to have effects on lipoproteins the opposite that of estrogen (52, 53). Studies examining the effects of exogenous hormones in premenopausal women, however, have found significantly higher magnitudes of change in lipid and lipoprotein levels (1). With administration of exogenous estrogens, hormone levels are relatively high and steady during the study period, possibly overriding the fluctuating levels of endogenous hormones and their influences, thus allowing changes in lipid and lipoproteins to be more easily detected.
Endogenous levels of estradiol, progesterone, and other hormones are periodic throughout the menstrual cycle. In addition to variations in the underlying hormonal patterns between and within a woman, there are considerable variations in menstrual cycle length (54, 55). Menstrual cycle lengths vary from woman to woman and may even vary from month to month for the same woman. It is thus important to control for these variations, because these factors make it difficult to study changes in lipid and lipoprotein levels within the menstrual cycle and are likely to partially account for differences in previous findings (7, 8, 9, 10).
The levels of TC, TG, VLDL-C, LDL-C, HDL-C, TC/HDL-C, and LDL-C/HDL-C have been shown not to change significantly or to either increase or decrease between the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle (8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 16) (Table 4
). Differences from previous findings may be due to several factors. Many earlier studies were performed on very few women (n = 814) (5, 7, 8, 13, 56). In this study, results from paired t tests using a smaller number of only 25 women showed a significant change only in the TC/HDL-C ratio between phases, not in the other lipid measures, although changes were of similar magnitude to those found in the larger group. With a smaller number of subjects, there was less power to detect the small differences in lipid and lipoprotein measurements observed between the two menstrual cycle phases in the larger sample.
The wide range in the days used in defining the follicular and luteal phases may also be a factor. Only a few studies that related the lipid and lipoprotein levels to menstrual cycle phases included data on hormone levels (9, 12, 13, 56, 57) to verify the menstrual cycle phase. Some studies defined the different phases of the menstrual cycle using only menses date (number of days into the cycle) and daily basal body temperature with or without specifying the day of blood sampling within the menstrual cycle. Progesterone levels during the luteal phase were rarely measured. Often the menstrual cycle phase was specified, but the length of the cycle, with day of blood collection, was not included (10). Including women with menstrual cycle lengths less than 25 d and those more than 35 d may affect findings, because these women may be anovulatory (53) and thus may not follow the usual hormonal fluctuations within a normal menstrual cycle that cause a noticeable effect on differences in the lipid and lipoprotein levels between phases. The fact that the timing of ovulation is difficult to ascertain (53) further compounds the problem, because it also makes it difficult to ensure that luteal lipid and lipoprotein data are actually obtained during the midluteal phase of the menstrual cycle, characterized by peak concentrations of progesterone and estradiol (53).
In addition, the length of the fasting period before blood collection was either not stated or varied from study to study (5, 7, 10). In several studies (5, 7, 9, 11, 56, 57), characteristics of the subject population were not adequately described, omitting information such as the subjects ethnicity, intake of alcohol, physical activity level, and dietary intake during the study. Also, despite the fact that diet is known to affect lipid and lipoprotein levels, only a few studies were performed under controlled dietary conditions (10, 14, 16). The differences described above make it difficult to determine changes in the lipid and lipoprotein profile between the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle and to compare reported findings.
Future studies involving women during their reproductive age need to more clearly define and validate menstrual cycle phase in the design and interpretation of study results. It is important to look at multiple samples per subject within each phase and clearly define the timing of and conditions under which samples are being collected. Fluctuations in levels of LDL-C and the TC/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C ratios between menstrual cycle phases, although short term and small, need to be considered in the screening and medical monitoring of premenopausal women, especially those with borderline levels. Although small, such fluctuations may prove to be clinically significant in the long run.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: CHD, Coronary heart disease; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; VLDL-C, very LDL cholesterol.
Received March 24, 2003.
Accepted November 10, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-ethinyl estradiol. J Biol Chem 254:1136711373This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Saleh, M. Al-Khanbashi, M. Al-Maarof, M. Al-Lawati, S. G Rizvi, and K. Cianflone Acylation-stimulating protein increases and correlates with increased progesterone levels during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2009; 160(2): 301 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ahmadizad, A. H. Haghighi, and M. R. Hamedinia Effects of resistance versus endurance training on serum adiponectin and insulin resistance index Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 157(5): 625 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lamon-Fava, J. B. Barnett, M. N. Woods, C. McCormack, J. R. McNamara, E. J. Schaefer, C. Longcope, B. Rosner, and S. L. Gorbach Differences in Serum Sex Hormone and Plasma Lipid Levels in Caucasian and African-American Premenopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4516 - 4520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |