| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Letter to the Editor |
ski and
Wojciech Barud
University School of Medicine in Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland
Address correspondence to: Robert Palusi
ski, M.D., Department of Medicine, University School of Medicine in Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland. E-mail: robert.p.palusinski{at}uth.tmc.edu.
The article by Dr. Rosner (1) points out an important problem of long-term side effects of finasteride treatment brought about by the surprising results of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) (2). In this study, chronic inhibition of 5
-reductase was associated not only with sexual dysfunction and gynecomastia, but also with a worrisome increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer. Keeping in mind a higher incidence of breast cancer reported by the other group (3), it seems reasonable to believe that long-term treatment with finasteride may disturb androgen-estrogen balance to the extent that may result in carcinogenesis.
Many epidemiological and experimental studies have shown that prostate hyperplasia and cancer develop more frequently in a hormonal milieu where estrogens predominate over androgens, as it happens in aging males. The inhibition of 5
-reductase further shifts the hormonal imbalance associated with aging by decreasing 5
-dihydrotestosterone and increasing testosterone, which in turn may be locally aromatized to estrogens. The aberrant up-regulation of aromatase expression in benign prostate hypertrophy and prostate cancer (4) makes this scenario even more probable.
The other possible mechanism by which hormonal changes may affect prostate cancer development is the capacity of sex hormones to modulate immune response. Androgen and estrogen receptors are present on most immune competent cells, and sex hormones are known to affect T helper 1 (Th1)/Th2 cell balance (5, 6). Th1 response is associated with cell-mediated immunity, e.g. elimination of cancerous cells, whereas Th2 response is credited with immune tolerance such as fetus survival during pregnancy. Therefore, finasteride could potentially be involved in alteration of immune surveillance against cancer in aging males.
In this context, the alternative method of prostate cancer prevention in elderly men could paradoxically be a substitutive treatment with 5
-dihydrotestosterone. In many studies, this nonaromatizing androgen restored estrogen/androgen balance by decreasing plasma levels of estradiol and testosterone. Dihydrotestosterone supplementation appears to have favorable effects on sexual function and cardiovascular system, with no adverse effects on the prostate as measured by symptoms, prostate-specific antigen levels, or prostate volume (7). Therefore, it would be of great clinical importance if the rigorous assessment of the prevalence of prostate cancer, such as in PCPT, were accommodated in long-term studies employing treatment with non-5
-reducible androgens (e.g. dihydrotestosterone).
Footnotes
A response to this letter was invited, but the authors of the original article chose not to provide one.
Received September 14, 2004.
References
ski R, Makaruk B, Hanzlik J 2003 Dihydrotestosterone treatment in men with coronary artery disease. Influence on sex hormones, lipid profile, insulin resistance and fibrynogen. Annales UMCS Sectio D 58:241246
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |